I have been contacted by a "Senior Climate Change Disinformation Journalist" at the BBC who claims he will "debunk" that extreme temperatures recorded across Europe were somehow “faked”.

He is referring to my tweets, and asked me to comment, giving me a deadline of tomorrow morning.

According to how fairly he represents my tweets and reply, I will decide whether to publish his email and my response to it. He has been informed of this too.

Let's see what the BBC comes up with tomorrow..should be a humorous read overall..

@RobinMG

I found this in the deep pile of my email inbox.
Those who’ve claimed that “VAERS & Yelow Card cannot be used for attribution of reported concerns after c19 injection” might not know any more than the mantra “correlation is not causation”.
While that’s perfectly true, they all se to have missed two, vital, corollaries.
1. Where there is causation, there will be correlation.
2. The purpose of the monitoring systems is not to allow a reviewer to directly read off adverse effect risks. It’s purpose is to provide a mechanism for safety alerts which MUST prompt investigation, among other things, to see if attribution is reasonable.
There are well established methods for doing those investigations including, for example, looking at the time relationship to injections and reported adverse events. Events which occur rapidly after injection are simpler evidence of causation. If the time between dosing and the Yellow Card report varies from a day to a year, it would be much weaker evidence.
Another is to look at background incidence & compare that with the prevalence after the potentially causative intervention.
There are causation criteria & thresholds to determining causation, eg those of Bradford Hill, with an FDA threshold of 5 of 9 criterion being met signalling causation.
None of this is new, which is why some of us we willing, very eariy, to glance at the Yellow Card and especially VAERS datasets and put our hands up.
Last time I checked, all 9 of the Bradford Hill criteria were met after c19 injections.

This paper in what I would previously have considered a leading medical journal, is normie proof. Some of the authors are linked to regulators and others through grants to Pfizer.
It’s definitely causative.
It always was causative.
It was intentional. Which is why there’s no official announcement or government changing of stance.
Hold firm, parents. Just say no.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fda-sponsored-study-concedes-pfizers-covid-shot-increases-risk-of-myocarditis-in-children/

🚨 Dr. Malone Drops a Bomb: Population Control Is ‘Official Policy Of US Government’

“Documents reveal that capping population growth at 8 billion is official US policy,” reported Dr. Robert Malone.

“So we now have a series of documents and receipts that lay out the real political logic that the US should act through a variety of different means, including birth control, advancing abortion, and advancing technologies for reduction in population.”

Original Clip: https://rumble.com/v32hru8-dr.-robert-malone-population-control-is-official-policy-of-us-government..html

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Socials

RIP Sinead o Connor
Was it vaccine related?

The simple question to ask with regards to whether the elites are genuine in their alleged concern about climate change and the drive to stop people driving fuel powered cars in order to price the masses out of expensive to buy & run electric cars is: would he lie to you?

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1684351592999288834

URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT
Temperature stations will report heat trapped in urban heat islands or UHIs which have no correlation to the climate, but to the heat trapped in the urban agglomeration. Any weather station positioned near these UHIs are considered not up to accurate temperature reporting standards, especially when these data-sets are then used to push an increased rate of global warming agenda. These are also known as corrupted climate stations. 96% of all climate stations in the US were found to be corrupted with regards to NOAA standards in a study made in 2022.
https://heartland.org/opinion/media-advisory-96-of-us-climate-data-is-corrupted/

MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE IN SARDINIA REPORTED FROM A MILITARY ROCKET MOTOR TESTING SITE. This is an image from the Poligono sperimentale e di addestramento interforze di Salto di Quirra where the Italian Air Force weather station of Capo San Lorenzo in Jerzu, Sardinia, is situated. Can anyone confirm testing activity on the 24th July 2023?
https://www.esa.int/About_Us/ESRIN/Successful_first_test_for_Vega_s_Zefiro_9_engine

WEATHERGATE: The climate station with the claimed highest recorded temperature in Sardinia: Jerzu, Capo San Lorenzo, is also known as in the Italian Chernobyl. Its main activity deals with the tests of various types of tactical missiles & rocket engines used or built by Italy, or in collaboration. It is also hired out to arms manufacturers.
https://www.libreidee.org/2011/01/la-chernobyl-italiana-strage-di-pastori-e-agnelli-deformi/

WEATHERGATE & NATO
NATO also uses the testing range where the weather station claimed the highest temperature in Sardinia, and 5 containers with uranium have been found there. It is suspected that tests for uranium and depleted uranium are taking place there. 10 of the 18 local shepherds developed cancer, and sheep are born with deformities
https://www.libreidee.org/2011/02/uranio-a-quirra-il-giudice-sigilla-il-poligono-radioattivo/
https://www.libreidee.org/2011/02/sindrome-di-quirra-ora-si-indaga-sul-poligono-dei-tumori/

WEATHERGATE. These are the official WMO recognised weather stations in Sardinia. THERE IS NO weather station in JERZU town Sardinia. There are 3 classified as Jerzu by the Italian military: Perdasdefogu (41°C) Capo San Lorenzo (Italian Chernobyl 47°C) & closest station with GCOS (Global Climate Observation System) standards used by the WMO (World Meterorogical Organization) is Capo Bellavista which reported 45°C max on July 24th 2023. NOT 48.2°C in Jerzu as claimed by the BBC. So where did they take the 48.2°C number from?
https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stazioni_meteorologiche_della_Sardegna

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1684513711963209732

Friday at 10:20 p.m. first part and Sunday at 2 p.m. second part on Z1 television. You can watch here http://www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.winn.press/

Folks,
Please see this announcement for my twin appearances on Croatia broadcast TV tomorrow & Sunday.
We recorded two lengthy segments which I believe are overdubbed by Andrija Klaric, an entrepreneur and leading campaigner in Croatia. For example, he organised the largest street demonstrations the country has seen.
Timings & links in his forwarded message.
Please would you share widely?
Unless the authorities physically enter the station, they cannot censor what’s being broadcast to the public.
It’s an exciting action.
Best wishes
Mike

https://t.me/robinmg/29263

French statistician, Christine Cotton, has criticised the Pfizer / BioNTech c19 injectable product, I think on solid grounds. Unfortunately the public won’t understand the reasons why these grounds are reasonable to call into question the commercial product that was injected to very many people.

Here’s my rebuttal of their critique of what she wrote.

Best wishes
Mike

Like they say in war, you know you’re right over the target when the flak becomes most intense.

Reading between the lines, they completely failed to counter either principal concerns.

There are two manufacturing processes & they even admit to reductions in mRNA integrity and method of synthesis. However, they gloss over the real possibility of clinical differences by stating that EMA endorsed process 2 (commercial process). It’s not possible so to endorse given the dataset with which they were provided. No one knows exactly what differences may give rise to important differences in clinical behaviour (either safety or effectiveness or both).

The traditional way you assess equivalence in biological products is by a comparison of adverse events and where available, efficacy. You get the former, theoretically, as a matter of course, because adverse event monitoring should be reflected in reports to such systems as VAERS. Isn’t it odd that they neglected to summarise the VAERS profile of process 2 and compare it to the claimed adverse event reports during the formal trials on process 1 product?

Several times, they stated that her remark that process 2 product was tested on only approximately 250 people was incorrect. Oddly enough, they didn’t do the obvious thing and tell us how many people did receive it in safety and efficacy trials. It was unavoidably much smaller than in the original trial (of process 1 product).

I’m also of the view that it was too small a trial even to conclude anything about safety, and absolutely nothing in efficacy. Such a study would be hopeless underpowered to detect anything useful beyond, perhaps, PK, which is noteworthy by its absence at any stage during formal development activities. It’s inappropriately missing because of the sleight of hand, procedurally, as a result of classifying it as a vaccine. While I recognise that PK with traditional vaccines probably is uninformative, that’s definitely NOT true with these novel gene based products. 

It’s obvious that both her observations are fundamentally correct. There’s no doubt that a changed manufacturing process has led to a non identical product. That’s inevitable with complex biological products. It’s definitely not a simple matter to check a few parameters and then to declare that they’re equivalent. That’s because at this stage, nobody knows what changes are tolerated and which are not. In fact the only way to properly characterise what is essentially a new product is to formally test it again. Only with extended experience can it very reasonably be said that product emerging from different manufacturing processes are likely to be clinically equivalent.

It’s VERY troubling that they don’t tell us how many people were administered process 2 product before exposing millions, if not billions, of people to it.

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/pfizer-biontech-mrna-covid19-vaccine-safe-tested-more-than-250-people-christine-cotton/

This is data and though it is depressing, I think it’s important that you know it.
It’s the collective us that has to try to change this through pleasant but relentless conversations.
Better methods welcomed.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/20/most-americans-favor-restrictions-on-false-information-violent-content-online/

"It is high time that patients and the medical profession rose against the dreadful imposition of what was essentially mandatory vaccine with no informed consent."

PROFESSOR ANGUS DALGLEISH, ONCOLOGIST