Forwarded from Mairead
"Rally on the 19th August 2023 at 12 PM ,Town Hall Clock Tower ,Leicester , U.K. with Andrew Bridgen MP, Dr Mohammad Adil, Dr Khong, Dr Qazi etc
Dear All
Historic rally of the freedom movement with Mr Andrew Bridgen , X MPA Leicester, Ex Member of the Parliament U.K. , Dr Mohammad I Adil MBBS. FRCS Ex Consultant Surgeon U.K. , Dr Teck Khong , Dr Almas U Din Qazi MBBS. FRCS Ex- Consultant Surgeon U.K. and many more health professionals & speakers on Saturday the 19th August 2023 at 12 pm at Clock Tower , Leicester , United Kingdom . Unleashing the truth on the Covid -19, Lockdowns & vaccine mandate !
Great gathering “ Not to be missed “! Join us with great strength !
Chairman :
The World Doctors Alliance ( WDA)"
Dear All
Historic rally of the freedom movement with Mr Andrew Bridgen , X MPA Leicester, Ex Member of the Parliament U.K. , Dr Mohammad I Adil MBBS. FRCS Ex Consultant Surgeon U.K. , Dr Teck Khong , Dr Almas U Din Qazi MBBS. FRCS Ex- Consultant Surgeon U.K. and many more health professionals & speakers on Saturday the 19th August 2023 at 12 pm at Clock Tower , Leicester , United Kingdom . Unleashing the truth on the Covid -19, Lockdowns & vaccine mandate !
Great gathering “ Not to be missed “! Join us with great strength !
Chairman :
The World Doctors Alliance ( WDA)"
❤62👏34👍19
LETTER FROM JONATHAN HALL TO PATRICK HENNINGSEN AT 21WIRE ON 'NO VIRUS' THEORIES
"Patrick,
I respect all you've done over the years and have agreed with your Covid analysis on many points, though on the 'no virus' theories, the case is not convincing as arguably it often relies on over-simplifications, assumptions and the exclusion of key evidence to form premature conclusions.
One main over-simplification is the 'either/or' binary logic the debate is framed i.e. 'the virus is real' vs 'there is no virus, it's all fake'. Though I argue the situation is more complex and the debate can be reframed to consider both a real virus AND a fake virus at the same time. For example, a real engineered virus of lab origin is somehow released to cause epidemics AND 'coincidentally' the 'global pandemic' crisis is exploited via fake scientific/medical data and media propaganda etc. to serve Big Finance, MIC, Corporate State, Big Pharma and Globalist business plans and policies.
So, I argue it was both REAL AND FAKE. But 'no virus' theories conclude 'it's all fake' while noticeably excluding key evidence e.g. 'real-world' reports of MDs with advanced knowledge of treating Covid patients such as Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory and many, many others. Strangely there is a huge disconnect between doctors like these and 'no virus' proponents including doctors, academics and media commentators like you who likely have no in-depth experience or knowledge of Covid and ignore vast research evidence on the distinct pathologies of Sars-Cov-2.
Just focus on the symptoms! Sars-Cov-2 has some overlaps with coronaviruses, flu etc. but is very different and was found to be more of a vascular disease than respiratory. It's hard to diagnose due to the complex range of symptoms it can present throughout the body and also be confused with. Severe Covid can be summarised as a dry cough, high fever, fatigue, aches, changes to sense of taste and smell, T lymphocyte exhaustion, low blood calcium, potassium and nitric oxide bioavailability. Also, elevated blood C-reactive protein, blood ferritin, IL-6 and TNF-alpha and abnormal AST/ALT levels. Severe symptoms include endothelial dysfunction, GI manifestations, inflammation, blood clotting, cytokine storms, mitochondria damage, oxidative stress, hypoxia, ARDS, lung fibrosis, multi-organ failure, neuro-degenerative disease and chronic fatigue to name but a few. The Spike Protein itself is a toxin that is pro-coagulant and amyloidogenic with a prion-like domain, a superantigenic region and abilities to bind to LFA-1 integrins and harm immune cells, penetrate the blood-brain barrier and act similarly to HIV gp120, also including various other genetic anomalies. Please review the excellent scientific summary of Sars-Cov-2 pathophysiology provided to me by Spartacus of ICENI starting on page 5 of the PDF copy attached and also refer to the links to articles below as well.
Do the symptoms I have described sound like the "weird pneumonia" that the MSM characterised COVID-19 as? Journalism has mostly failed to grasp with the complexity of its pathophysiology leading to many, even doctors, underestimating it, including yourself and other alt-media who now deny its very existence! This is not a 'rebranded flu'! It's an advanced bio-agent and very real to the fatalities, bereaved and those suffering with Long Covid symptoms. To what extent is hard to define due to all the fakery, however, it's solid evidence that 'no virus' theories cannot simply exclude.
"Patrick,
I respect all you've done over the years and have agreed with your Covid analysis on many points, though on the 'no virus' theories, the case is not convincing as arguably it often relies on over-simplifications, assumptions and the exclusion of key evidence to form premature conclusions.
One main over-simplification is the 'either/or' binary logic the debate is framed i.e. 'the virus is real' vs 'there is no virus, it's all fake'. Though I argue the situation is more complex and the debate can be reframed to consider both a real virus AND a fake virus at the same time. For example, a real engineered virus of lab origin is somehow released to cause epidemics AND 'coincidentally' the 'global pandemic' crisis is exploited via fake scientific/medical data and media propaganda etc. to serve Big Finance, MIC, Corporate State, Big Pharma and Globalist business plans and policies.
So, I argue it was both REAL AND FAKE. But 'no virus' theories conclude 'it's all fake' while noticeably excluding key evidence e.g. 'real-world' reports of MDs with advanced knowledge of treating Covid patients such as Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory and many, many others. Strangely there is a huge disconnect between doctors like these and 'no virus' proponents including doctors, academics and media commentators like you who likely have no in-depth experience or knowledge of Covid and ignore vast research evidence on the distinct pathologies of Sars-Cov-2.
Just focus on the symptoms! Sars-Cov-2 has some overlaps with coronaviruses, flu etc. but is very different and was found to be more of a vascular disease than respiratory. It's hard to diagnose due to the complex range of symptoms it can present throughout the body and also be confused with. Severe Covid can be summarised as a dry cough, high fever, fatigue, aches, changes to sense of taste and smell, T lymphocyte exhaustion, low blood calcium, potassium and nitric oxide bioavailability. Also, elevated blood C-reactive protein, blood ferritin, IL-6 and TNF-alpha and abnormal AST/ALT levels. Severe symptoms include endothelial dysfunction, GI manifestations, inflammation, blood clotting, cytokine storms, mitochondria damage, oxidative stress, hypoxia, ARDS, lung fibrosis, multi-organ failure, neuro-degenerative disease and chronic fatigue to name but a few. The Spike Protein itself is a toxin that is pro-coagulant and amyloidogenic with a prion-like domain, a superantigenic region and abilities to bind to LFA-1 integrins and harm immune cells, penetrate the blood-brain barrier and act similarly to HIV gp120, also including various other genetic anomalies. Please review the excellent scientific summary of Sars-Cov-2 pathophysiology provided to me by Spartacus of ICENI starting on page 5 of the PDF copy attached and also refer to the links to articles below as well.
Do the symptoms I have described sound like the "weird pneumonia" that the MSM characterised COVID-19 as? Journalism has mostly failed to grasp with the complexity of its pathophysiology leading to many, even doctors, underestimating it, including yourself and other alt-media who now deny its very existence! This is not a 'rebranded flu'! It's an advanced bio-agent and very real to the fatalities, bereaved and those suffering with Long Covid symptoms. To what extent is hard to define due to all the fakery, however, it's solid evidence that 'no virus' theories cannot simply exclude.
👍66❤18🤡11💯7🥰1
Prof. Rancourt's academic work based on all-cause mortality data has useful insights on the hidden impacts of Covid policies such as lockdown harms, medical mistreatment and so on that have led to 'no virus/pandemic' theories but as key evidence of Sars-Cov-2 is missing, arguably it is incomplete. Even if Sars-Cov-2 (and variants) did not match the patterns of typical respiratory disease or a 'pandemic' and the threat, impacts and 'The Science' etc. were intentionally manipulated to 'create demand' for vaccines and policies, it still does not equate to conclude that Sars-Cov-2 is 'all fake'. Prof. Rancourt, Dr. Yeadon and others including you may have the right intentions, but I argue need to be far more careful about presenting controversial theories as definite conclusions in public. Also, your role as journalist would be best used to facilitate much needed respectful debate on the issues.
You have mentioned you can argue both sides of the argument, but by missing out key medical evidence on Sars-Cov-2, it's questionable what your level of knowledge really is or why it's being omitted? Have you interviewed MDs with Covid expertise and asked for their views about 'no virus' theories? You must be aware of the extreme difficulties MDs went through by bravely resisting medical tyranny via smear, censorship and legal tactics etc. and the results they achieved with early treatment protocols rather than vaccines? How can you now disregard this as if it never happened?
Will 'no virus' proponents factor in the evidence outlined and reconsider their conclusions? Or will they continue to ignore medical evidence such as the distinct pathologies of Sars-Cov-2 as it does not fit with the theories? Are they also aware of all the wider consequences and implications of their actions? As I argue there are serious risks to public health by under-estimating agents such as Sars-Cov-2 and bio-warfare capabilities generally. There are many questions and unknowns that frankly you and other commentators are guessing and making assumptions about. People need to learn from Covid and be fully prepared with early treatments. Not act as if risks do not exist at all! For has it occurred to you 'no virus' theories influence the public to have a false sense of security on the risks and so are less prepared and able to respond should there be similar or worse incidents, increasing illness, hospitalisations and deaths? Also, how far you are willing to go personally in real-life with this theory? Are you going to refuse effective anti-viral early treatments if you have Sars-Cov-2 symptoms? Do you aim for not only tweets of approval but for followers to do the same? Are you really sure about that? I think you need to be more responsible in considering all the implications.
It's likely we can agree on medical, scientific, industry, corporate state, regulatory, academic, NGO and MSM deceptions and frauds that went into overdrive during Covid and the systemic corruption for business and political interests, across the fields of science and medicine including virology, life sciences and so on. Maybe terrain theory raises useful questions about the grey areas of virology, germ theory etc. while it still has much to prove e.g. in practical medical terms. So realistically, this is a long term debate and process that has its place but is not top priority in this critical situation.
You have mentioned you can argue both sides of the argument, but by missing out key medical evidence on Sars-Cov-2, it's questionable what your level of knowledge really is or why it's being omitted? Have you interviewed MDs with Covid expertise and asked for their views about 'no virus' theories? You must be aware of the extreme difficulties MDs went through by bravely resisting medical tyranny via smear, censorship and legal tactics etc. and the results they achieved with early treatment protocols rather than vaccines? How can you now disregard this as if it never happened?
Will 'no virus' proponents factor in the evidence outlined and reconsider their conclusions? Or will they continue to ignore medical evidence such as the distinct pathologies of Sars-Cov-2 as it does not fit with the theories? Are they also aware of all the wider consequences and implications of their actions? As I argue there are serious risks to public health by under-estimating agents such as Sars-Cov-2 and bio-warfare capabilities generally. There are many questions and unknowns that frankly you and other commentators are guessing and making assumptions about. People need to learn from Covid and be fully prepared with early treatments. Not act as if risks do not exist at all! For has it occurred to you 'no virus' theories influence the public to have a false sense of security on the risks and so are less prepared and able to respond should there be similar or worse incidents, increasing illness, hospitalisations and deaths? Also, how far you are willing to go personally in real-life with this theory? Are you going to refuse effective anti-viral early treatments if you have Sars-Cov-2 symptoms? Do you aim for not only tweets of approval but for followers to do the same? Are you really sure about that? I think you need to be more responsible in considering all the implications.
It's likely we can agree on medical, scientific, industry, corporate state, regulatory, academic, NGO and MSM deceptions and frauds that went into overdrive during Covid and the systemic corruption for business and political interests, across the fields of science and medicine including virology, life sciences and so on. Maybe terrain theory raises useful questions about the grey areas of virology, germ theory etc. while it still has much to prove e.g. in practical medical terms. So realistically, this is a long term debate and process that has its place but is not top priority in this critical situation.
💯30👍14❤11🤔3
The top priorities are building on the advances against tyranny and totalitarianism to further raise public awareness, seek justice, demand change and prevent it happening again. All MFM groups need to put differences aside, focus on common ground and work together on the big challenges ahead. It is very counter-productive for MFM groups to aggressively challenge other groups with divisive and polarising arguments that instigates in-fighting and wastes valuable time and energy that could be better used fighting common enemies instead. 'They' must be laughing at this kind of behaviour. 'They' also gain from the consequences of growing hostility and fragmentation in which MFM figures, who have made real progress worthy of respect, become targets of accusations for not following the 'no virus' doctrine, using many 'ad hominem' and other typical trolling traits.
This hostile and disruptive behaviour is to the extent that I can understand Robin Monotti's general point in your Twitter exchange with him (he clarified it was not aimed at you personally) about how the 'no virus' campaign and narrative could be hijacked as part of an operation to destabilise and discredit the MFM, and how these consequences would be strategically intentional and beneficial. Are you fully aware of all the possible agents, trolls, bots etc. that are pushing these narratives and their motivations? It would be interesting to do a Twitter network analysis, because as Robin referred to and I agree, there is suspicious behaviour of extensive trolling across the web on 'no virus' issues. Furthermore, the false binary/oppositional dialectic tactics that Robin points do seem to correlate with those of 'no virus' tactics. Objectively, can you recognise the similarities? And can you see my point on how these tactics cause division and distract attention away from higher priority issues and challenges? Such as forming a united, large-scale resistance to reject the WHO pandemic treaty, mRNA vaccines, CBDCs/ID, closing biowarfare labs and ending all of the fraud and corruption etc. in the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory capture of MHRA, FDA etc.
In summary, I again urge you to please focus on reviewing the evidence of Sars-Cov-2 I've referred to and interviewing MDs with advanced experience of treating Covid. Please also work more as a facilitator to encourage respectful debate on both the differences and common ground, so MFM groups can 'agree to disagree' as mature adults and professionals, and co-operate on shared goals.
I have copied in a number of relevant professionals to encourage wider public debate on the issues.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Hall
Related Articles:
The best overall summary I've found on Sars-Cov-2 pathophysiology that is fully referenced:
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part I: Pathophysiology | ICENI | Substack
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part-i-pathophysiology
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part IX: Addendum | ICENI | Substack
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-ix-addendum
Please also read the Sars-Cov-2 summary report by Spartacus on page 5.
Interesting articles on the 'no virus' debate from a medical doctor with experience of Covid:
Thoughts on the Existence of Viruses and Evaluating Controversial Scientific Discussions | The
Forgotten Side of Medicine | Substack
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-the-existence-of-viruses
Nuanced Ideas and Simplistic Truths in the Context of COVID-19 | The Forgotten Side of Medicine | Substack
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/nuanced-ideas-and-simplistic-truths"
This hostile and disruptive behaviour is to the extent that I can understand Robin Monotti's general point in your Twitter exchange with him (he clarified it was not aimed at you personally) about how the 'no virus' campaign and narrative could be hijacked as part of an operation to destabilise and discredit the MFM, and how these consequences would be strategically intentional and beneficial. Are you fully aware of all the possible agents, trolls, bots etc. that are pushing these narratives and their motivations? It would be interesting to do a Twitter network analysis, because as Robin referred to and I agree, there is suspicious behaviour of extensive trolling across the web on 'no virus' issues. Furthermore, the false binary/oppositional dialectic tactics that Robin points do seem to correlate with those of 'no virus' tactics. Objectively, can you recognise the similarities? And can you see my point on how these tactics cause division and distract attention away from higher priority issues and challenges? Such as forming a united, large-scale resistance to reject the WHO pandemic treaty, mRNA vaccines, CBDCs/ID, closing biowarfare labs and ending all of the fraud and corruption etc. in the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory capture of MHRA, FDA etc.
In summary, I again urge you to please focus on reviewing the evidence of Sars-Cov-2 I've referred to and interviewing MDs with advanced experience of treating Covid. Please also work more as a facilitator to encourage respectful debate on both the differences and common ground, so MFM groups can 'agree to disagree' as mature adults and professionals, and co-operate on shared goals.
I have copied in a number of relevant professionals to encourage wider public debate on the issues.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Hall
Related Articles:
The best overall summary I've found on Sars-Cov-2 pathophysiology that is fully referenced:
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part I: Pathophysiology | ICENI | Substack
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part-i-pathophysiology
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part IX: Addendum | ICENI | Substack
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-ix-addendum
Please also read the Sars-Cov-2 summary report by Spartacus on page 5.
Interesting articles on the 'no virus' debate from a medical doctor with experience of Covid:
Thoughts on the Existence of Viruses and Evaluating Controversial Scientific Discussions | The
Forgotten Side of Medicine | Substack
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-the-existence-of-viruses
Nuanced Ideas and Simplistic Truths in the Context of COVID-19 | The Forgotten Side of Medicine | Substack
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/nuanced-ideas-and-simplistic-truths"
Substack
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part I: Pathophysiology
The first in a series of articles exploring each aspect of the pandemic in detail
👍53❤11👏8💯2
THE TRUTH ABOUT OPPENHEIMER / PART ONE
"Christopher Nolan’s new film #oppenheimer appears to humanize J. Robert Oppenheimer as an eclectic genius who was haunted by the profound consequences of the weapon he created.
However, another story lurks beneath #Oppenheimer. A secret story. One that saw Manhattan Project scientists conducting clandestine medical experiments on unwitting and innocent American citizens.
The true story is that, while the United State led the prosecution of Nazi war criminals, Manhattan Project scientists secretly injected American citizens with lethal doses of plutonium without the subjects’ knowledge or consent.
If the Manhattan Project was meant to protect America, why would its scientists be injecting American civilians with radioactive material?
Christopher Nolan describes “Oppenheimer” as “a horror film,” stating that the film will leave viewer contemplating dark and unsettling questions. The information in “The Truth About Oppenheimer” will leave you disgusted."
https://vitaldissent.com/oppenheimer
https://libertarianinstitute.org/patrick/the-truth-about-oppenheimer-part-one/
"Christopher Nolan’s new film #oppenheimer appears to humanize J. Robert Oppenheimer as an eclectic genius who was haunted by the profound consequences of the weapon he created.
However, another story lurks beneath #Oppenheimer. A secret story. One that saw Manhattan Project scientists conducting clandestine medical experiments on unwitting and innocent American citizens.
The true story is that, while the United State led the prosecution of Nazi war criminals, Manhattan Project scientists secretly injected American citizens with lethal doses of plutonium without the subjects’ knowledge or consent.
If the Manhattan Project was meant to protect America, why would its scientists be injecting American civilians with radioactive material?
Christopher Nolan describes “Oppenheimer” as “a horror film,” stating that the film will leave viewer contemplating dark and unsettling questions. The information in “The Truth About Oppenheimer” will leave you disgusted."
https://vitaldissent.com/oppenheimer
https://libertarianinstitute.org/patrick/the-truth-about-oppenheimer-part-one/
Vital Dissent
Human Experimentation in the Radiological Weapons Group - Vital Dissent
THE TRUTH ABOUT “OPPENHEIMER” Part I Imagine this hypothetical. A material is found that has...
🤔20👍17❤15🤬7🔥6
Robin Monotti
Aug 3, 2023 New federal funding criteria provides hope to already-closed nuclear power plants The latest guidance from DOE expands eligibility to nuclear reactors that are at risk of closing, as well as reactors that stopped operating after November 15,…
Max Wilbert, Organizing Director, Deep Green Resistance:
"In 2010 in the wake of BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a satire website ran this headline: “Millions of Barrels of Oil Safely Reach Port in Major Environmental Catastrophe.” The point was well-made. It’s not just oil spills that are disastrous. The “safe, well regulated” extraction and burning of oil is just as disastrous.
Nuclear energy, the darling of eco-modernist climate movement, is the same. Reactors are not just disasters-waiting-to-happen; they are disasters in progress."
The Nuclear Question: Are We “Hostages to Modernity”? [April 8, 2020]
https://dgrnewsservice.org/civilization/colonialism/the-nuclear-question-are-we-hostages-to-modernity/
"In 2010 in the wake of BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a satire website ran this headline: “Millions of Barrels of Oil Safely Reach Port in Major Environmental Catastrophe.” The point was well-made. It’s not just oil spills that are disastrous. The “safe, well regulated” extraction and burning of oil is just as disastrous.
Nuclear energy, the darling of eco-modernist climate movement, is the same. Reactors are not just disasters-waiting-to-happen; they are disasters in progress."
The Nuclear Question: Are We “Hostages to Modernity”? [April 8, 2020]
https://dgrnewsservice.org/civilization/colonialism/the-nuclear-question-are-we-hostages-to-modernity/
Deep Green Resistance News Service
The Nuclear Question: Are We "Hostages to Modernity"?
Deep Green Resistance advocates for ending industrialization and moving to a localized, low-energy society. What about nuclear reactors?
If the DGR vision were carried out and the electrical grid dismantled, wouldn’t it lead to nuclear meltdowns?
By Max Wilbert…
If the DGR vision were carried out and the electrical grid dismantled, wouldn’t it lead to nuclear meltdowns?
By Max Wilbert…
👍27❤8🤣4😭2😁1
"The book is listed as a ‘best-seller’ in the Weather section category of books and has 14 ratings with an average of one star.
Amazon describes the book in the following way: ‘Fire and Fury: The Story of the Maui Fire and its Implications for Climate Change is a gripping and eye-opening account of one of the most devastating wildfires in Hawaii’s history, and how it reveals the urgent need to address the global climate crisis.
‘The book chronicles the events of August 8-11, 2023, when a massive fire swept across the island of Maui, fueled by drought, heat, and hurricane winds.’
It also reportedly describes the harrowing experiences of the people who lived through the fire, as well as the heroic efforts of the firefighters and rescuers who battled the flames. Furthermore, the book is said to draw on scientific research, eyewitness accounts, official reports, and media coverage to provide a comprehensive and compelling narrative of the Maui fire and its implications for climate change.’
The book also offers practical solutions and recommendations on how we can prevent and prepare for future wildfires, and how we can reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to a changing climate.
‘[It] is a must-read for anyone who cares about the environment, the future of humanity, and the fate of our beautiful planet.’"
https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2023/08/16/fire-and-fury-story-of-2023-maui-fire-dr-miles-stones-amazon-book-sparks-wild-conspiracy-theories/
Amazon describes the book in the following way: ‘Fire and Fury: The Story of the Maui Fire and its Implications for Climate Change is a gripping and eye-opening account of one of the most devastating wildfires in Hawaii’s history, and how it reveals the urgent need to address the global climate crisis.
‘The book chronicles the events of August 8-11, 2023, when a massive fire swept across the island of Maui, fueled by drought, heat, and hurricane winds.’
It also reportedly describes the harrowing experiences of the people who lived through the fire, as well as the heroic efforts of the firefighters and rescuers who battled the flames. Furthermore, the book is said to draw on scientific research, eyewitness accounts, official reports, and media coverage to provide a comprehensive and compelling narrative of the Maui fire and its implications for climate change.’
The book also offers practical solutions and recommendations on how we can prevent and prepare for future wildfires, and how we can reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to a changing climate.
‘[It] is a must-read for anyone who cares about the environment, the future of humanity, and the fate of our beautiful planet.’"
https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2023/08/16/fire-and-fury-story-of-2023-maui-fire-dr-miles-stones-amazon-book-sparks-wild-conspiracy-theories/
🤬67🤯49❤18🤔16👍12🤡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ROBERT F KENNEDY JR TEACHES BBC VACCINE LESSON:
🔥185👍50❤38👏15🤔3⚡2💯2😐2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RFK JR TO BBC: "IT'S NOT SCIENCE, DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT?"
❤183👏87🔥27👍10❤🔥6😁4🤔1😐1
Forwarded from MoD Russia
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡️Briefing by Chief of Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Protection Troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov on U.S. military-biological activity
📄 Full text
🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
📄 Full text
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍57🤡7🔥3❤1🤯1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
⚡️ Briefing by Chief of Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Protection Troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov on US military-biological activity (August 16, 2023)
◽️ Despite the fact that the stated goals of US programmes are to monitor disease incidence and provide assistance to developing countries, in fact, we see the Pentagon conducting uncontrolled dual-use research in circumvention of international obligations under the BTWC.
☝️ There is a clear trend: pathogens that fall within the Pentagon's area of interest, such as COVID-19, avian influenza, African swine fever, subsequently become pandemic, and American pharmaceutical companies become the beneficiaries.
***
◽️ The next step, taken by the United States to realise its strategic plans in establishing global biological control, was the creation of the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy.
It is envisaged that the new structure will be responsible for setting the course and coordinating actions to combat known and unknown biological challenges, including pathogens that could trigger another global emergency.
👉 Thus, as in 2019, the US has begun preparing for a new pandemic by searching for virus mutations.
The US Army Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, currently headed by Colonel Constance Jenkins, will play a leading role in the military department's biomedical warfare programme.
⚠️ Documents, obtained during the special military operation, show that the institution is directly involved in the collection of dangerous pathogens in various regions of the world, testing of unregistered drugs, as well as the implementation of dual-use programmes, ordered by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the US Department of Defense.
Read in full
◽️ Despite the fact that the stated goals of US programmes are to monitor disease incidence and provide assistance to developing countries, in fact, we see the Pentagon conducting uncontrolled dual-use research in circumvention of international obligations under the BTWC.
☝️ There is a clear trend: pathogens that fall within the Pentagon's area of interest, such as COVID-19, avian influenza, African swine fever, subsequently become pandemic, and American pharmaceutical companies become the beneficiaries.
***
◽️ The next step, taken by the United States to realise its strategic plans in establishing global biological control, was the creation of the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy.
It is envisaged that the new structure will be responsible for setting the course and coordinating actions to combat known and unknown biological challenges, including pathogens that could trigger another global emergency.
👉 Thus, as in 2019, the US has begun preparing for a new pandemic by searching for virus mutations.
The US Army Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, currently headed by Colonel Constance Jenkins, will play a leading role in the military department's biomedical warfare programme.
⚠️ Documents, obtained during the special military operation, show that the institution is directly involved in the collection of dangerous pathogens in various regions of the world, testing of unregistered drugs, as well as the implementation of dual-use programmes, ordered by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the US Department of Defense.
Read in full
👍75🤡18❤12🤔3💯1
Dear all,
I’m to be in conversation with Brucha Weissberger this weekend coming, Sunday 6 U.K.
The link below should connect you. Please note, any comma issues, reach out to the hosts end.
Best wishes
Mike
Here is the link for Sunday’s event, to share with your followers:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9521753151?pwd=QnhXdmJ3Q2FFV202K1RvSGpkK0ZvQT09
Or: tinyurl.com/TruthSavesLives
Meeting ID 952 175 3151 Passcode 1818
I’m to be in conversation with Brucha Weissberger this weekend coming, Sunday 6 U.K.
The link below should connect you. Please note, any comma issues, reach out to the hosts end.
Best wishes
Mike
Here is the link for Sunday’s event, to share with your followers:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9521753151?pwd=QnhXdmJ3Q2FFV202K1RvSGpkK0ZvQT09
Or: tinyurl.com/TruthSavesLives
Meeting ID 952 175 3151 Passcode 1818
Zoom
Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise cloud communications.
👍28❤11👏9😁1
The Government in Pretoria, South Africa, has been ordered by what sounds like due authority to release all sorts of documents related to the “vaccines”.
https://neasa.co.za/covid-19-a-momentous-court-victory/
https://neasa.co.za/covid-19-a-momentous-court-victory/
NEASA
Covid-19: A momentous court victory!
❤79👍31🔥6🤬1
Former Great Britain swimmer Helen Smart has died suddenly at the age of 43.
"Smart, who was a backstroke specialist and competed under her maiden name Don-Duncan, represented Team GB at the Sydney Olympics in 2000 and also won medals at the World and European Championships as well as the Commonwealth Games."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/swimming/2023/08/16/helen-smart-great-britain-olympics-swimmer-dies/
"Smart, who was a backstroke specialist and competed under her maiden name Don-Duncan, represented Team GB at the Sydney Olympics in 2000 and also won medals at the World and European Championships as well as the Commonwealth Games."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/swimming/2023/08/16/helen-smart-great-britain-olympics-swimmer-dies/
The Telegraph
Helen Smart: Team GB Olympic swimmer dies suddenly aged 43
Sharron Davies paid tribute to Smart, who competed for Team GB in several international swimming events
😢88👍10❤4🙏4🤯2💔2
Jonathan Van-Tam joins Covid vaccine maker Moderna
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/17/jonathan-van-tam-joins-covid-vaccine-maker-moderna/
"One of the architects of Britain’s pandemic response has taken a role advising Covid vaccine maker Moderna.
Prof Sir Jonathan Van-Tam, England’s former deputy chief medical officer, joined the US pharmaceutical giant as senior medical consultant in May."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/17/jonathan-van-tam-joins-covid-vaccine-maker-moderna/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/17/jonathan-van-tam-joins-covid-vaccine-maker-moderna/
"One of the architects of Britain’s pandemic response has taken a role advising Covid vaccine maker Moderna.
Prof Sir Jonathan Van-Tam, England’s former deputy chief medical officer, joined the US pharmaceutical giant as senior medical consultant in May."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/17/jonathan-van-tam-joins-covid-vaccine-maker-moderna/
The Telegraph
Jonathan Van-Tam joins Covid vaccine maker Moderna
England's former deputy chief medical officer appointed as part-time adviser
🤬145🥴21🤡20❤4🔥4🤔4🕊2👀2⚡1👍1🙏1