"Requirement to wear masks in hospitals may have had little [zero] impact on COVID-19 transmission during omicron wave"
"Requirements to wear surgical masks in a large London hospital during the first 10 months of omicron activity (December 2021 to September 2022) made no discernible difference to reducing hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections, according to new research being presented at this year's European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Copenhagen, Denmark (15–18 April).
To find out more, researchers from St George's Hospital in south-west London analyzed routinely collected infection control data over a 40-week period between December 4, 2021 (the first week when the omicron variant became dominant) and September 10, 2022 (when universal COVID-19 screening on admission by PCR stopped) to examine hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections in relation to changes in mask-wearing policies over time.
During the first phase of the study (December 4, 2021 to June 1, 2022), all staff and visitors were required to wear masks in both clinical and non-clinical areas of the hospital. Then in phase two, at week 26 (June 2, 2022 to September 10, 2022) the surgical mask-wearing policy was removed for the majority of wards (study group), while a subset of high-risk wards (i.e., renal hematology and oncology wards, the medical admissions unit and intensive care units) retained the mask obligation policy for staff (control group).
The analysis found that during a general community surge in SARS-CoV-2 infection in June 2022, removal of the mask policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in the rate of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in the study group—with SARS-CoV-2 infection no higher than the rate when masks were obligatory.
What's more, the authors did not observe a delayed effect, with no change in the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate during the time when the mask-wearing policy was removed (weeks 26 to 40).
Similarly, the control group who continued wearing masks, found no immediate or delayed change in infection rate.
"Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the omicron variant," says lead author Dr. Ben Patterson from St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London."
Requirement to wear masks in hospitals may have had little impact on COVID-19 transmission during omicron wave
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-04-requirement-masks-hospitals-impact-covid-.html
"Requirements to wear surgical masks in a large London hospital during the first 10 months of omicron activity (December 2021 to September 2022) made no discernible difference to reducing hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections, according to new research being presented at this year's European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Copenhagen, Denmark (15–18 April).
To find out more, researchers from St George's Hospital in south-west London analyzed routinely collected infection control data over a 40-week period between December 4, 2021 (the first week when the omicron variant became dominant) and September 10, 2022 (when universal COVID-19 screening on admission by PCR stopped) to examine hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections in relation to changes in mask-wearing policies over time.
During the first phase of the study (December 4, 2021 to June 1, 2022), all staff and visitors were required to wear masks in both clinical and non-clinical areas of the hospital. Then in phase two, at week 26 (June 2, 2022 to September 10, 2022) the surgical mask-wearing policy was removed for the majority of wards (study group), while a subset of high-risk wards (i.e., renal hematology and oncology wards, the medical admissions unit and intensive care units) retained the mask obligation policy for staff (control group).
The analysis found that during a general community surge in SARS-CoV-2 infection in June 2022, removal of the mask policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in the rate of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in the study group—with SARS-CoV-2 infection no higher than the rate when masks were obligatory.
What's more, the authors did not observe a delayed effect, with no change in the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate during the time when the mask-wearing policy was removed (weeks 26 to 40).
Similarly, the control group who continued wearing masks, found no immediate or delayed change in infection rate.
"Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the omicron variant," says lead author Dr. Ben Patterson from St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London."
Requirement to wear masks in hospitals may have had little impact on COVID-19 transmission during omicron wave
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-04-requirement-masks-hospitals-impact-covid-.html
Medicalxpress
Requirement to wear masks in hospitals may have had little impact on COVID-19 transmission during omicron wave
Requirements to wear surgical masks in a large London hospital during the first 10 months of omicron activity (December 2021 to September 2022) made no discernible difference to reducing hospital-acquired ...
❤39👍34🔥9💯7🤣2
Two scientists whose lectures are often very helpful in understanding the extent to which climate has changed recently and historically as well as the likely significance of recent changes.
In this piece, they’re arguing that EPA is drawing unsupported conclusions from sparse data.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/article/two-princeton-mit-scientists-say-epa-climate-regulations-based-on-a-hoax-5460699
In this piece, they’re arguing that EPA is drawing unsupported conclusions from sparse data.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/article/two-princeton-mit-scientists-say-epa-climate-regulations-based-on-a-hoax-5460699
The Epoch Times
Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’
Two climate scientists say new EPA rules to cut CO2 emissions “will be disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason.”
👍47🔥15❤2😁1
Is a new "pandemic" being planned?
https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/practical-activism-for-the-next-plandemic
https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/practical-activism-for-the-next-plandemic
👍62💯29❤4🔥2🤬1
TABLETOP EXERCISE
"Catastrophic Contagion"
"Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people."
Catastrophic Contagion
https://catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org/
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692844974461616578
"Catastrophic Contagion"
"Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people."
Catastrophic Contagion
https://catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org/
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692844974461616578
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
Catastrophic Contagion | Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
🤬89🤡13👍11❤3🤔3🙏1
NOTICE TO THE "NO VIRUS" THEORISTS:
A number of people in the freedom movement have adopted the narrative that viruses do not exist.
I personally consider this position wrong on all possible levels, and we would have to go back to 1898, when the word was first used by Beijerinck and analyze every single virus identified since independently and in detail to have this debate, so it's not something that we have the time to do, it would take a lifetime or two, and to me the result is also a foregone conclusion, so I have no interest in this exercise, nor the time for it, but that is beside a much more important point, that I will try and explain in a notice here.
This is a very dangerous position to promote publicly, for the health of others. For the following reasons:
1. You can't possibly exclude as a certainty that various labs have viruses that they will release as bioweapons. We already know that Porton Down in the UK is claiming they are working on making "variants". There are claims of such work in Wuhan, and in Ukraine, as well as Fort Detrick, and there are labs in Georgia too.
2. If a virus is released, and this time it's even more dangerous than the last one, and you are making people believe that no such thing exists, then these people will ignore any treatment that is identified as a possible cure or antidote. Do you really want to dissuade people from seeking out treatments if this does happen?
3. If a virus is released, and people do start dying from it, and it's because you have influenced them to believe that no such thing exists, you become partially responsible for the failure of these people to seek treatment. Is that what you really want?
4. Such irresponsability has the potential to shut down the entire freedom movement as "virus deniers", and during a possible real emergency, there will be no hesitation in holding such views and people responsible by the authorities, which could easily organise scientific proof of the new virus in a court of law, specifically for the objective of a show trial against the "no-virus anti-vaxxers".
5. You are entitled to your own scientific views, but you must also consider your shared liability with other members of the freedom movement, and the counterproductive strategy of publicly proclaiming as a certainty something which you can't be certain of, as you don't know for sure what is happening in gain of function labs around the world.
I therefore consider it highly irresponsible to push this view onto others who may indeed be stocking up on treatments for the next "pandemic" without your influence over them. And it's irresponsible to potentially give such an open goal to the authorities to come for all of us in the next "pandemic" with careful proof of their gain of function virus, which they may be preparing now specifically for a court trial.
If I am wrong, nothing will happen, as the virus does not exist. If I am right, then you possibly become co-responsible with the perpetrators of any potential real death as a result of an untreated infection, because the infected person listened to your theory that "viruses don't exist". Think about it, there is no certainty in science, so why publicly act as if there is when it has the potential to damage our entire movement?
I will add below the wording in the letter of Jonathan Hall to Patrick Henningsen, which I think is useful to explain this in other words than mine.
A number of people in the freedom movement have adopted the narrative that viruses do not exist.
I personally consider this position wrong on all possible levels, and we would have to go back to 1898, when the word was first used by Beijerinck and analyze every single virus identified since independently and in detail to have this debate, so it's not something that we have the time to do, it would take a lifetime or two, and to me the result is also a foregone conclusion, so I have no interest in this exercise, nor the time for it, but that is beside a much more important point, that I will try and explain in a notice here.
This is a very dangerous position to promote publicly, for the health of others. For the following reasons:
1. You can't possibly exclude as a certainty that various labs have viruses that they will release as bioweapons. We already know that Porton Down in the UK is claiming they are working on making "variants". There are claims of such work in Wuhan, and in Ukraine, as well as Fort Detrick, and there are labs in Georgia too.
2. If a virus is released, and this time it's even more dangerous than the last one, and you are making people believe that no such thing exists, then these people will ignore any treatment that is identified as a possible cure or antidote. Do you really want to dissuade people from seeking out treatments if this does happen?
3. If a virus is released, and people do start dying from it, and it's because you have influenced them to believe that no such thing exists, you become partially responsible for the failure of these people to seek treatment. Is that what you really want?
4. Such irresponsability has the potential to shut down the entire freedom movement as "virus deniers", and during a possible real emergency, there will be no hesitation in holding such views and people responsible by the authorities, which could easily organise scientific proof of the new virus in a court of law, specifically for the objective of a show trial against the "no-virus anti-vaxxers".
5. You are entitled to your own scientific views, but you must also consider your shared liability with other members of the freedom movement, and the counterproductive strategy of publicly proclaiming as a certainty something which you can't be certain of, as you don't know for sure what is happening in gain of function labs around the world.
I therefore consider it highly irresponsible to push this view onto others who may indeed be stocking up on treatments for the next "pandemic" without your influence over them. And it's irresponsible to potentially give such an open goal to the authorities to come for all of us in the next "pandemic" with careful proof of their gain of function virus, which they may be preparing now specifically for a court trial.
If I am wrong, nothing will happen, as the virus does not exist. If I am right, then you possibly become co-responsible with the perpetrators of any potential real death as a result of an untreated infection, because the infected person listened to your theory that "viruses don't exist". Think about it, there is no certainty in science, so why publicly act as if there is when it has the potential to damage our entire movement?
I will add below the wording in the letter of Jonathan Hall to Patrick Henningsen, which I think is useful to explain this in other words than mine.
👍121🤡38❤20🤔4💯4👏2🔥1😁1
As a last point, I don't have any evidence of anyone pushing this theory being controlled opposition, so I am not making that claim. I believe most people making this claim are in good faith and sincerely believe their own theory, for their own reasons, which I do not share.
However, I do notice patterns on twitter of sock puppet accounts really pushing this theory aggressively.
I don't have the time to make an analysis of these accounts to prove this, but the indications are all there that there is a campaign to push this theory in my account, to associate me with it by force. I am here making it clear that I am distancing myself categorically from it.
Thank you for the consideration of my points and the negative repercussions that the public proclaiming as a certainty that viruses never existed, and therefore never shall exist in future, can have on our entire movement.
@RobinMG
Extract from letter to Patrick Henningsen from Jonathan Hall:
"Will 'no virus' proponents factor in the evidence outlined and reconsider their conclusions? Or will they continue to ignore medical evidence such as the distinct pathologies of Sars-Cov-2 as it does not fit with the theories? Are they also aware of all the wider consequences and implications of their actions? As I argue there are serious risks to public health by under-estimating agents such as Sars-Cov-2 and bio-warfare capabilities generally. There are many questions and unknowns that frankly you and other commentators are guessing and making assumptions about. People need to learn from Covid and be fully prepared with early treatments. Not act as if risks do not exist at all! For has it occurred to you 'no virus' theories influence the public to have a false sense of security on the risks and so are less prepared and able to respond should there be similar or worse incidents, increasing illness, hospitalisations and deaths? Also, how far you are willing to go personally in real-life with this theory? Are you going to refuse effective anti-viral early treatments if you have Sars-Cov-2 symptoms? Do you aim for not only tweets of approval but for followers to do the same? Are you really sure about that? I think you need to be more responsible in considering all the implications."
https://t.me/robinmg/29646
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692870149580243216
However, I do notice patterns on twitter of sock puppet accounts really pushing this theory aggressively.
I don't have the time to make an analysis of these accounts to prove this, but the indications are all there that there is a campaign to push this theory in my account, to associate me with it by force. I am here making it clear that I am distancing myself categorically from it.
Thank you for the consideration of my points and the negative repercussions that the public proclaiming as a certainty that viruses never existed, and therefore never shall exist in future, can have on our entire movement.
@RobinMG
Extract from letter to Patrick Henningsen from Jonathan Hall:
"Will 'no virus' proponents factor in the evidence outlined and reconsider their conclusions? Or will they continue to ignore medical evidence such as the distinct pathologies of Sars-Cov-2 as it does not fit with the theories? Are they also aware of all the wider consequences and implications of their actions? As I argue there are serious risks to public health by under-estimating agents such as Sars-Cov-2 and bio-warfare capabilities generally. There are many questions and unknowns that frankly you and other commentators are guessing and making assumptions about. People need to learn from Covid and be fully prepared with early treatments. Not act as if risks do not exist at all! For has it occurred to you 'no virus' theories influence the public to have a false sense of security on the risks and so are less prepared and able to respond should there be similar or worse incidents, increasing illness, hospitalisations and deaths? Also, how far you are willing to go personally in real-life with this theory? Are you going to refuse effective anti-viral early treatments if you have Sars-Cov-2 symptoms? Do you aim for not only tweets of approval but for followers to do the same? Are you really sure about that? I think you need to be more responsible in considering all the implications."
https://t.me/robinmg/29646
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692870149580243216
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
The Science of Covid19
Compiled by Jonathan Hall:
The best overall summary I've found on Covid19 pathophysiology that is fully referenced:
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part I: Pathophysiology | ICENI | Substack
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part…
Compiled by Jonathan Hall:
The best overall summary I've found on Covid19 pathophysiology that is fully referenced:
COVID-19 Deep Dive Part I: Pathophysiology | ICENI | Substack
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part…
👍74🤡23❤7🔥5🥴5
Forwarded from 💜 LOVE not fear
I will be speaking to Joseph Arthur about music and the counterculture on his Technicolor Dreamcast TNT radio show tonight at midnight New York time, 5am UK time!
Robin
@LOVEnotfearmankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJp-2bXlcck
https://tntradio.live/shows/joseph-arthur-his-technicolor-dreamcast/
Robin
@LOVEnotfearmankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJp-2bXlcck
https://tntradio.live/shows/joseph-arthur-his-technicolor-dreamcast/
YouTube
Love Mandate
Provided to YouTube by DistroKid
Love Mandate · Joseph Arthur
Love Mandate
℗ Moonage Rebel
Released on: 2022-02-09
Auto-generated by YouTube.
Love Mandate · Joseph Arthur
Love Mandate
℗ Moonage Rebel
Released on: 2022-02-09
Auto-generated by YouTube.
👍22❤3🤔2
The Stage and the Mother
Aug 14, 2023
"Illich wrote Deschooling Society in 1970. It is interesting to look back that period vis a vis the radical critiques of compulsory education. Paul Goodman, Paulo Freire, and indirectly Norman O. Brown, Macuse, and Debord. And by further extension, I suppose, the work of R.D. Laing. The point being, here, Illich was writing about a consumer society. And advanced capitalism today is not quite that anymore. But I will return to this. One interesting aspect of education is the manner in which the backdrop of ‘progress’ effects beliefs and aspirations.
When Darwin voyaged on The Beagle, Capt. FitzRoy abducted (for their own good) three children from an indigenous community at Tierra del Fuego. He returned to England with them, *educated* them, introduced them to civilized society (and even a meeting with the Queen). Eventually all three returned to their Fuegian community, wanting nothing more to do with England or Europe. FitzRoy was profoundly baffled."
https://john-steppling.com/2023/08/the-stage-and-the-mother/
Aug 14, 2023
"Illich wrote Deschooling Society in 1970. It is interesting to look back that period vis a vis the radical critiques of compulsory education. Paul Goodman, Paulo Freire, and indirectly Norman O. Brown, Macuse, and Debord. And by further extension, I suppose, the work of R.D. Laing. The point being, here, Illich was writing about a consumer society. And advanced capitalism today is not quite that anymore. But I will return to this. One interesting aspect of education is the manner in which the backdrop of ‘progress’ effects beliefs and aspirations.
When Darwin voyaged on The Beagle, Capt. FitzRoy abducted (for their own good) three children from an indigenous community at Tierra del Fuego. He returned to England with them, *educated* them, introduced them to civilized society (and even a meeting with the Queen). Eventually all three returned to their Fuegian community, wanting nothing more to do with England or Europe. FitzRoy was profoundly baffled."
https://john-steppling.com/2023/08/the-stage-and-the-mother/
👏41👍7❤6🤔1
"Whoever listens to his body and learns to understand its language holds the key to health. The feeling within one's body is more important than any medicine and also more important than any "objective" rational knowledge.."
Mattias Desmet, The Psychology of Totalitarianism.
https://t.me/robinmg/27447
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692944247920456188
Mattias Desmet, The Psychology of Totalitarianism.
https://t.me/robinmg/27447
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692944247920456188
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
Do you also want to understand why doctors have stopped listening to patients?
Follow Eva's journey, in:
📖THE BOOK OF VISION 👁
Executive producer Terrence Malick
Starring Charles Dance, Lotte Verbeek, Sverrir Gudnason
📽 Now on VOD in 🇬🇧 & 🇮🇪:
http…
Follow Eva's journey, in:
📖THE BOOK OF VISION 👁
Executive producer Terrence Malick
Starring Charles Dance, Lotte Verbeek, Sverrir Gudnason
📽 Now on VOD in 🇬🇧 & 🇮🇪:
http…
❤60💯23👍6🔥6🥰2🤨1
Forwarded from freedomtirade
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Just when you thought the pLandemic scamming was over and done with ...
Ponder ...
what a difference...
a pLandemic makes...
to the power and coffers...
of scammers and sheisters ....
and totalitarian planners...
What a difference...Montage 5minutes on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/WHAT-A-DIFFERENCE:5
In July 2023 the US Deep State created a brand new Pandemic Bureau to institutionalise the "successful" totalitarian pandemic response that was rolled out under COVID, which just so happened to be the worst scam in the history of medicine....
hEuriStiC mOntAgE
@freedomtirade
Ponder ...
what a difference...
a pLandemic makes...
to the power and coffers...
of scammers and sheisters ....
and totalitarian planners...
What a difference...Montage 5minutes on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/WHAT-A-DIFFERENCE:5
In July 2023 the US Deep State created a brand new Pandemic Bureau to institutionalise the "successful" totalitarian pandemic response that was rolled out under COVID, which just so happened to be the worst scam in the history of medicine....
hEuriStiC mOntAgE
@freedomtirade
🤬73👍10👏4❤3🔥3🏆2
Forwarded from freedomtirade
Much food for thought when you have twenty minutes to spare.
We're heading into the next pLandemic....
The medical bullying won't stop, until we rout the lies of the conspirators, one COUNTER narrative at a time ...
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/COUNTER-narrative:6?r=
"It didn't FEEL like 20 minutes...Very powerful IMHO.
John Laughland especially near the end hit it home with 'controlling the narrative" before there ever WAS a narrative. These people are SICK."
-M.Marshall
We're heading into the next pLandemic....
The medical bullying won't stop, until we rout the lies of the conspirators, one COUNTER narrative at a time ...
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/COUNTER-narrative:6?r=
"It didn't FEEL like 20 minutes...Very powerful IMHO.
John Laughland especially near the end hit it home with 'controlling the narrative" before there ever WAS a narrative. These people are SICK."
-M.Marshall
🔥74👍36❤10👏6💯4
Forwarded from 💜 LOVE not fear
I will be speaking to Joseph Arthur about music and the counterculture on his Technicolor Dreamcast TNT radio show tonight at midnight New York time, 5am UK time!
Robin
@LOVEnotfearmankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJp-2bXlcck
https://tntradio.live/shows/joseph-arthur-his-technicolor-dreamcast/
Robin
@LOVEnotfearmankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJp-2bXlcck
https://tntradio.live/shows/joseph-arthur-his-technicolor-dreamcast/
YouTube
Love Mandate
Provided to YouTube by DistroKid
Love Mandate · Joseph Arthur
Love Mandate
℗ Moonage Rebel
Released on: 2022-02-09
Auto-generated by YouTube.
Love Mandate · Joseph Arthur
Love Mandate
℗ Moonage Rebel
Released on: 2022-02-09
Auto-generated by YouTube.
❤22👏8👍6
'Khan tried to ‘silence’ scientists who questioned #Ulez claims, emails show'
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/08/19/khan-tried-silence-scientists-questioned-ulez-claims/
"The study from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters in 2021, found that the introduction of Ulez in 2019 cut nitrogen dioxide by less than three per cent and had insignificant effects on ozone and particulate matter."
"Correspondence shows deputy ‘really disappointed’ that Imperial College publicised findings questioning effectiveness of scheme"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/08/19/khan-tried-silence-scientists-questioned-ulez-claims/
"The study from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters in 2021, found that the introduction of Ulez in 2019 cut nitrogen dioxide by less than three per cent and had insignificant effects on ozone and particulate matter."
"Correspondence shows deputy ‘really disappointed’ that Imperial College publicised findings questioning effectiveness of scheme"
The Telegraph
Khan tried to ‘silence’ scientists who questioned Ulez claims, emails show
Correspondence shows deputy ‘really disappointed’ that Imperial College publicised findings questioning effectiveness of scheme
👍78🔥28❤10🤡5🙈2🤣1
The way some commentators on the thread below are laughing at the mere suggestion that patients should be listened to and considered as valid witnesses of their own bodies, and that they should be at the centre, not "data", is proof that we have a long way to go to get people off their numbers and data myopia, when it comes to patient centred medicine.
This is not so much better than those not listening to patient stories on vaccine injuries because they are statistically irrelevant, or contradict scientific theories of vaccine efficacy.
We still have to learn the main lesson of the vaccine harms story: listen to patients first, and their stories. They don't become relevant only as a tally on a mortality chart.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692870149580243216
This is not so much better than those not listening to patient stories on vaccine injuries because they are statistically irrelevant, or contradict scientific theories of vaccine efficacy.
We still have to learn the main lesson of the vaccine harms story: listen to patients first, and their stories. They don't become relevant only as a tally on a mortality chart.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692870149580243216
👍62❤14💯8🙈4🤡2
Forwarded from Counter-Covid-Crime
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andrew Bridgen presentjng more hard evidence today in Leicester.
Reopen met investigation 6929679/21 immediately.
#Iwillnotcomply
#ineverconsented
Www.donotconsent.co.uk
Reopen met investigation 6929679/21 immediately.
#Iwillnotcomply
#ineverconsented
Www.donotconsent.co.uk
❤171👍36👏11🔥2
How long can this be attributed to "lockdowns" instead of "vaccines"? Do they need new lockdowns now to pre-emptively cover up the "vaccine" deaths from the 2023-24 "vaccination" campaign?
@RobinMG
@RobinMG
🤬147👍27🔥10❤3🙈2
Robin,
On the absolutist position, we are aligned.
I do think it’s POSSIBLE that the entire discipline is fraudulent.
I agree however that despite my long career in life sciences, I don’t know enough WITH A HIGH LEVEL OF CERTAINTY to adopt a public position that there are no viruses.
Frankly, it hardly matters what I think, because we’re all incredibly circumscribed in the people we can reach.
I’d go further and say that, if we were much more effective than we actually are, we would almost certainly be murdered.
That said, I’m not inhibited in any way by that risk, because I’ve already decided I’m not interested in scuttling around in a highly constrained retirement, flinching at each new restriction and humiliation.
So I’ll communicate or die trying!
If I was appreciably younger, in full health and with a partner who doesn’t think the same way I do about it all, I might well have a different perspective.
For example, on the transmission experiments, I’ve clearly got homework to do! In due course I’ll let you know whether what you’ve said is enough to destroy or substantially weaken it as an argument. If so, I’m willing to reinstate my earlier view that I cannot eliminate transmissible respiratory pathogens.
This wouldn’t change my opinion on the current fraudulent claim for a pandemic, nor the immunological argument that since the nastier it might be, the stronger that self limiting nature of spreading, pandemics of severe respiratory illnesses aren’t possible.
All the best,
Mike
On the absolutist position, we are aligned.
I do think it’s POSSIBLE that the entire discipline is fraudulent.
I agree however that despite my long career in life sciences, I don’t know enough WITH A HIGH LEVEL OF CERTAINTY to adopt a public position that there are no viruses.
Frankly, it hardly matters what I think, because we’re all incredibly circumscribed in the people we can reach.
I’d go further and say that, if we were much more effective than we actually are, we would almost certainly be murdered.
That said, I’m not inhibited in any way by that risk, because I’ve already decided I’m not interested in scuttling around in a highly constrained retirement, flinching at each new restriction and humiliation.
So I’ll communicate or die trying!
If I was appreciably younger, in full health and with a partner who doesn’t think the same way I do about it all, I might well have a different perspective.
For example, on the transmission experiments, I’ve clearly got homework to do! In due course I’ll let you know whether what you’ve said is enough to destroy or substantially weaken it as an argument. If so, I’m willing to reinstate my earlier view that I cannot eliminate transmissible respiratory pathogens.
This wouldn’t change my opinion on the current fraudulent claim for a pandemic, nor the immunological argument that since the nastier it might be, the stronger that self limiting nature of spreading, pandemics of severe respiratory illnesses aren’t possible.
All the best,
Mike
👍106❤29🔥13💯6🙏2🤡1