Guitar Legend Eric Clapton Has Put His Support Behind Robert F. Kennedy Jr for President

"He's honest and he's friendly and he's kind, and he says things that make sense about the country we live in and the world...I'm going to play for him in LA. I'm going to do a fundraiser...on the 18th of September."

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1694433638987772327

@ChiefNerd

I hope i didn’t speak for 90min. In truth, I hadn’t checked exactly what I was there to do, so I didn’t have my thoughts properly organized. Apologies.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/metatron/p/dr-mike-yeadon-have-you-stopped-trusting

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/albertas-danielle-smith-refuses-to-enforce-trudeaus-unconstitutional-net-zero-energy-plan/

Folks,
This is great to see. An elected politician explicitly stating the the whole Canadian government’s energy strategy is not feasible & this province isn’t going to do it.
In what is presumably a coordinated communication plan, the spokesperson for the major energy company says the same thing.
Is this a first for a country in The West? Noisily calling out “Net Zero” for the lethally dangerous nonsense that it is?
Best wishes,
Mike

L'oligarca più attivo è Bill Gates: da sempre sostenitore dell'eugenetica, ora si presenta quale "salvatore" con i vaccini.

Nel 2009, in un meeting con Rockefeller, Ted Turner e altri riferito da Times e dal Wall Street Journal, discusse di come ridurre la popolazione e dettò la linea operativa.

Robin Monotti: da allora sono seguiti regolari incontri per metterla in atto.

The most active oligarch is Bill Gates: always a supporter of eugenics, now he presents himself as a "savior" with vaccines.

In 2009, in a meeting with Rockefeller, Ted Turner and others reported by the Times and the Wall Street Journal, he discussed how to reduce the population and dictated the course of action.

Robin Monotti: regular meetings have followed since then to implement it.

https://t.me/robinmg/29748

Another encouraging story, a factually correct criticism of the Mayor of London ‘s “pollution tax” based “ultra low emissions zone” (ULEZ) expansion plan, imminently to come into force.
I believe it’s ultimatel objective is to price ordinary people out of their privately owned vehicles. There’s no health benefit. Once catalytic converters were mandated to be fitted to all new vehicles many years ago, and diesel exhaust particulate filters, too, the air can’t get any cleaner and is in any case no longer injurious.
I worked on ozone and respiratory system injury in the late 1980s. We found that levels of ozone capable of producing damage was very much higher than the then prevailing levels.
Also, there isn’t one simple threshold because there’s a dynamic equilibrium between oxidant stressors in inhaled air and the availability of free radical quenching antioxidants in airway surface liquid. It’s smother case of fake science or scientism, being used to assault people’s liberty for no good reason and plenty of nefarious motives.
By the way, I slightly know Professor Frank Kelly. He was doing related work back then and it looks like he still is, despite the tide having gone out entirely on his niche field a very long time ago.
Why would he say the things he’s said about air pollution? Other colleagues at Imperial are to issue some kind of statement of disagreement with Kelly. Good on them.
Best wishes,
Mike

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/world/mayor-accused-of-attempting-to-squash-scientific-dissent-over-ulez-5477766

https://www.cieh.org/what-is-environmental-health/the-future-of-eh/frank-kelly

Here’s an example of Professor Frank Kelly scaremongering about air quality.
Air quality is so much better now than in any previous decade over the last century.
While one can always manufacture a concern out of little to nothing, I’m certain of this: the adverse health impacts of a single injection of the toxic-by-design “covid19 vaccines” far, far outweighs years of exposure to the much cleaner London air now.
I wonder to what extent grant funding is a contributing factor to his confected concerns?
Best wishes
Mike

Many of us believe that the world is overpopulated. But why do we believe that?
The answer is straightforward: we’ve been told it is & many of us have chosen to believe it. There’s no more to it than that.
There’s no objective yardstick that’s used to support the contention. There are dramatic visuals used in TV propaganda & these are chosen over myriad alternatives that could have been used. Filming in very busy city street in India gives you the impression that they surely must be running out of room!?
Yet if you were to fly over rural India, you might see nobody at all.
This is true even in highly populated countries like U.K.
Some people have had reasons to plant the seeds of over population in our minds over many decades. Along with the notions of over population come concerns for shortages and even running out of certain resources.
In practise, in their book, Superabundance, the authors show that on the contrary, when increased demand raises the time price of something (how long do you need to work in order to buy a given thing). This sends signals to look for ways to increase supply, use something else that’s more plentiful etc.
Far from the worlds population being imminently about to consume & run out of a number of limited resources, we see nothing but human flourishing almost everywhere we look.
Yet again, we’re being lied to.
Arm yourself with independently acquired perspectives & turn off the TV!
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/epochtv/gale-pooley-resources-are-actually-becoming-more-abundant-not-less-heres-why-5475576

IN MEDICINE, SYMPTOMS ARE THE TRUTH, NOT THEORIES.

If you believe that science falls short of explaining reality, that doesn't mean reality doesn't exist. It just means reality operates in ways your understanding of science can't explain.

In medicine, reality are the symptoms as experienced by the patient and observed by the doctor. Explanations and theories come second, and do not over-rule the symptoms.

The symptoms are the truth, the patient is always right about his/her symptoms. It's the symptoms and the categories they fall under that are real, not the scientific theories used to explain them, which are in continuous evolution.

This does not mean the categories don't exist, as they are based on the only thing that demonstrably exists, which are the symptoms.

@RobinMG

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1694648341060112575

About the "Pirola" "variant" name:
In Milan, "Pirla" is a dialect form for penis. The literal translation of "pirla" is "dickhead".

They are literally "taking the piss"..

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1694653354683564041

📻 Loved chatting with grammy nominee Russel Walder about his role as composer for RIVER OF FREEDOM.

Let’s all keep lifting our vibrations and spread the beautiful energy that was created at the parliament protest in 2022!! #ENDTHEMANDATES

See you at The Civic for the Auckland Premiere on Tuesday 5 September!

Check out the interview on our FB page: https://fb.watch/mCV_DtZuLW/

Looking forward to Russel's new album Speak To The Storm, out in a few days!! Check out his website: www.russelwalder.com

#RiverOfFreedomFilm #HeartoftheProtest
#RusselWalder #NZmusic
#nzdocumentary #NewZealand #documentary
#HiguysitsMeagan

Terrain Theory or Germ Theory? How did Ancient Persian, Greek and Indian Physicians Treat Disease?

"Germ theory focuses on "exogenous" & Terrain theory on "endogenous" factors that cause imbalances, which humas call "Disease." The problem is both theories (rooted in Europe) have a "reductionist" approach, separating an "organism" into "organs" and from "nature" (Other organisms/organs).

Way before microscopes, Eastern physicians like Avicenna (4th century, from #Persia) or Galen (2nd century, from Greece) and Indian Ayurvedic Physicians treated disease effectively using a non-reductionist (holistic) approach. I have studied parts of Avicenna's "Canon of Medicine" (Ghanoon in Persian/Arabic). I have summarized my findings on how they ingeniously and wisely treated disease in my new article here: shorturl.at/suFS5 "

Ray Armat.

"I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THE BODY"

Felice Cimatti - Professor of Philosophy of Language and Mind at the University of Calabria, Italy.

"The doctor Johan Anmuth (his is The Book of Vision studied by Eva), ..believes in a medicine in which the body is not just a sack containing organs and fluids: he treats his patients first of all by listening to their stories and fears, as if he were at the same time a scientist and a psychoanalyst ante litteram. An ancient, patient, fallible medicine that relies even before technology on the body’s intrinsic ability to react to illness. The body, for Anmuth, is connected to the life of people and places, woods and waters, dreams and nightmares.

The idea of ​​the body of the new young doctor who takes his place is completely different, a Cartesian and quantitative idea, the body as machine which needs to be repaired like a broken clock. In the middle there is a woman’s body, that of Elizabeth / Eva, the subject of male discourses, both in the past (the new doctor takes over from the old one to follow her third pregnancy) and in the present (Eva is pregnant, and the pregnancy is at risk for a serious heart problem; a situation that, doctor Baruch Morgan tells her, requires a choice, she must have an abortion if she does not want to risk dying). What is at stake is precisely the body, silent but not mute, slow but not passive, singular but not individual.

What is a body, then? In the film, two eras and two world-views collide, one which ends with Galileo and Descartes, the animated and sensitive world of the anima mundi, and the technological and artificial world of modern science, that of the inert body of an increasingly artificial and inhumane medicine (it is a robot with many mechanical arms that operates Eva). It is difficult, we said, not to see this film without thinking about the months we have just lived, the epidemic and the quarantine, the scientists who tell us what we must do, their words as sentences without appeal, the silence of all others voices, starting from the disappearance (for the first time in human history, probably), of religion and the sacred."

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2022/11/30/i-wanted-to-talk-about-the-body/

"Power is an educational system that divides us into those who subjugate and those who are subjugated. But be very careful: that same educational system forms all of us, from the people in the so-called establishment to the poorest social classes. This is the main reason why we all want the same things and behave in the same ways. Members of the establishment may use a board of directors or a stock exchange manoeuvre; people from more disadvantaged classes may use a metal bar. You essentially use a metal bar to violently obtain what you want. But why do you want it? Because they told you that wanting something is a virtue and you are therefore exercising your right-virtue. So you’re a murderer, but you’re essentially good....

The first tragedy we live is one shared, compulsory and wrong education that pushes us to own everything at any price. We are pushed and pulled around like a strange dark army, some of us fight with the heavy artillery, others with just a metal bar. As it usually happens, the group gets divided and some decide to fight with the weak ones. But I think that, in one way or the other, we are all weak because we are all victims. And we are all guilty, because we are all ready to play at slaughtering each other, as long as we are able to own everything at the end of the slaughter. In a nutshell, the education we received can be summarised with these words - having, owning and destroying....

But compulsory education creates by force desperate gladiators. Like desperation or rage, the crowd gets bigger..."

Paolo Pasolini, 1975

Civil liberties don’t depend on data. - Mark Changizi

https://twitter.com/MarkChangizi/status/1694465212651385172

With the @WCH_org team at the @JamForFreedom Festival 2023 💜

"I wrote to Prince Charles two years ago, urging him to dissociate himself from Klaus Schwab, who is clearly a psychopath. I reminded him that he was the only public figure who had dared [forty years ago] to stand against [architectural] modernism. But he wrote back, 'This is too far gone, and even I can't do anything about it.'"

ukcolumn.org/video/a-glimpse-into-cities-architecture-planning-and-control-with-leon-krier

Eric Clapton for Truth, Unity & Peace
https://youtube.com/watch?v=9F9DpOmjGfA&feature=shared

LETTER FROM JONATHAN HALL TO THE HART GROUP

HART Group,

I've much respect for your members work involved in campaigns, media appearances and high quality articles analysing Covid issues. However, more recently I've been very concerned with the organisations move towards 'no virus'/'no viruses' theories and proponents, within the contents of articles, posts, interviews etc. and in particular, some of the views from co-chair Dr. Jonathan Engler.

I have therefore written a letter to Dr. Jonathan Engler in context of his recent Twitter exchange with Robin Monotti, and my letter to journalist Patrick Henningsen regarding 'no virus' theories of which was posted on Robin's Twitter feed. The letter to Dr. Jonathan Engler raises relevant points and questions for him to clarify his position.

As I am unable to find his direct email address via web search, I request for you to please forward this message with attachments to him and also please confirm with a reply when you have done so.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Hall

---

Letter to Dr. Jonathan Engler on comments to Robin Monotti and 'no virus' theories  
After reading through your comments in response to Robin Monotti's posts regarding 'no virus' theories, I am writing to raise relevant points and ask questions for you to clarify your position.  

"A number of people in the Freedom Movement are "straw manning" the hypothesis that people like myself, Mike Yeadon, @EWoodhouse7, @MartinNeil9 and others hold. They are mis-characterising our position as being one that claims viruses don't exist. None of the people I have named have said that (though I am aware others in the " movement" who have)."
Dr. Jonathan Engler | Twitter | https://twitter.com/jengleruk/status/1692886667613352169

I don't think it is right to accuse Robin of intentionally "straw manning" or "mis-characterising" your groups position in an attempt to "suppress" views. He and myself have been criticising 'no virus' groups generally of which include "others in the movement who have" made 'no-virus' claims as you state. Many others in fact who seem very certain and are often quite aggressive in forming conclusions, not hypotheses, that Sars-Cov-2 does not exist and further that viruses do not exist. Thanks for summarising your personal views, the nuances and details of your groups position, and for pointing out the members mentioned have not made 'no virus' claims. It also needs to be pointed out however there are examples of people you have publicly referred to, referenced and worked with in the media. such as Dr. Mike Yeadon, Prof. Denis Rancourt and Patrick Henningsen, who have clearly made definite 'no virus' and 'no viruses' claims within articles, interviews, posts etc.

“Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus”
“This lie is that there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus”,
“a few people would have known there was no new hazard in their environment.”
“If I’m correct that there was no novel virus”
“there surely must be a novel virus when there isn’t.”
“I can reach no other conclusion than that it’s fake.”

Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus | TCW | Dr. Mike Yeadon
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-i-dont-believe-there-ever-was-a-covid-virus/

"In 2020, no respiratory disease virus or viruses (the postulated SARS-CoV-2 included) caused any anomaly (total or incremental) in all-cause mortality."

What I believe about COVID | Activist Teacher | Prof. Denis Rancourt
https://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2021/01/what-i-believe-about-covid.html

Many interviews, commentaries and videos on 'no virus', 'no viruses' and 'no bio-weapon/GoF' theories.
Patrick Henningsen | 21st Century Wire | Covid-19 Archive
https://21stcenturywire.com/tag/covid-19/