I’m placing this here without any comment other that the author claims this to be an authoritative listing of articles and videos which challenge the orthodoxy of germ theory.
Please don’t be offended by my exploring the odd rabbit hole. My motivation is simply to increase my awareness and understanding of the competing narratives.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.starfirecodes.com/p/virology-unmasking-a-100-year-old

My view is that when something is presented in terms of competing binaries like two narratives opposing each other it is done to purposefully divide people.

More often than not the binaries are both faked oversimplifications.

More often than not one narrative creates a straw man of the other.

Explored yesterday how traditional medicine's path of complexity and inter-connectedness is the holistic path to healing, not choosing between oversimplifications

Eg. Who ever said that anybody needs to make a choice between germ & terrain theory? It is positioning things in this way which is clearly wrong to anyone who can embrace complexity.

@RobinMG

https://t.me/robinmg/29756

FAKE BINARIES: CIA APPROVED

Psyops always come with a counter psyop. This is an obfuscation strategy, to push sceptics towards an extreme position which loses credibility for all the other sceptics. Eg:

A Viruses will kill us all
B Viruses don't exist

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1691862312817226210

Simple hypothesis which explains mild & severe C19:

There was not one pathogen but many, just like the vaccine batches.

This would follow their modus operandi of calibrating pathogen toxicity.

Some had a mild batch of GoF (Gain of Function), I had a severe one. They did with GoF exactly the same game plan as for the vaccines. I talked to other people who got a bad batch of GoF. Unprecedented ILI illness in all their lives. We've been around long enough to spot the difference. We're not stupid and it wasn't just coincidence we all got the worst ILI in our lives btw 2019-21.

If you exclude us from the picture, you won't form a theory which includes us..

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1695119083589550279

"Eris EG5 is a very mild and brief headcold"

Alborosie - Unprecedented Time | Official Music Video
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5jOEbgN4oYA&feature=shared

NEW - Biden's climate czar John Kerry: "Now humanity is inexorably threatened by humanity itself."

@disclosetv

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together."

Club of Rome:
"The First Global Revolution"
1991

https://t.me/robinmg/29788

https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/09/20/bill-gates-on-video-no-normalcy-until-everyone-takes-experimental-shots-and-you-dont-have-a-choice/

A report from autumn 2021, in which Mr Bill Gates, who has no formal educational accomplishments,tells the world “You’ve all got to be vaccinated (against covid)”.

Did no one at the time think “Why is this software guy ordering us around? What the dickens does he know about this field?”

I recognised that these injections were designed to injure, maim & kill, before any had emergency use authorization. I wrote an open letter to this effect with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who was centrally involved in halting & exposing as fraud the 2009 swine flu “pandemic” (PCR was the pivotal deceit). That we were fundamentally correct became clear very soon after mass injection began.

These toxicities aren’t random, they’re not inadvertent, they’re designed into the molecules.

“Mistakes were not made”, as Margaret Anna Alice wrote.

“Rational drug design”, as the method is called, has been my profession for over 30 years. So I was very sure.

Gates may not be a physician or scientist but he is undoubtedly clever. He’s been a major investor in vaccines. I don’t recall if he’s specifically an investor in Moderna or BioNTech. If he is, technical due diligence evaluation prior to a funding decision couldn’t fail to notice the fundamental problem with mRNA based products. They are not nor could be mass market products.

I think Gates is an evil, mega crook. I hope he bumps into justice, in this life or the next.

Best wishes
Mike

It's for "the greater good"..

This is what 'novel' means. Nothing more. It does not mean pandemic.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/novel-coronavirus

Yes SARSCoV2 was a "novel" coronavirus planned in 2018:

"The DEFUSE proposal not only suggested to add a FCS and human ACE2-binding RBD to a bat coronavirus, but also to introduce N-linked glycosylation sites.
Read this to understand how SARS2 has exactly such a site to bind to DC-SIGN, and why it is likely introduced."

https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1694925182043890015

'For all who say DEFUSE was a smokescreen to keep up a mythology:

DC-SIGN means:
YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM (Dendritic or Antigen Presenting Cells) get attacked.
How can your immune system properly defend you, when itself is the target?

Immunodysfunction was evident clinically May 2020'

https://twitter.com/53v3n0fn1n3/status/1695046797121421523

Yes SARSCoV2 was a "novel" coronavirus planned in 2018:

"Besides the furin cleavage site (FCS), SARS2 has another unique feature mentioned in DEFUSE not yet seen in any natural SARS-like viruses – an ablated N-linked glycan at position N370. This glycan was ablated via a T372A amino acid mutation that came about via a double nucleotide mutation of the original ACT codon into GCA (the latter, incidentally, is the same codon as the one coding for alanine – out of 4 possible alanine codons – in the PRRA insertion which has created an FCS in SARS2).

Importantly, the T327A mutation greatly increases SARS2 infectivity in human lung cells but, just like an FCS, this kind of a mutation seems to have selective pressure AGAINST it in ancestral bat viruses.

DEFUSE’s interest in N-linked glycans stems from a very curious observation about SARS1 whose bat progenitor seems to have temporarily lost two of its N-linked glycans in civet SARS1 progenitors before re-acquiring them, and this led virologists to hypothesize that those glycans could be relevant for host switching. This is described in DEFUSE in a somewhat convoluted way:"

Yuri Deigin

D.R.A.S.T.I.C cofounder

(Dedicated Research and Scientific Team Investigating Covid-19
We are the scientists and researchers who came together in early 2020 to investigate the origins of Covid-19.)

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1694846484334641181.html

Yes SARSCoV2 was a "novel" coronavirus planned and outlined in the DARPA DEFUSE proposal submitted in 2018.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1695335292792668541

SARSCoV2 WAS ASSEMBLED USING NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY

This is where in the 2018 DARPA DEFUSE proposal Baric is described as to be using nanoparticles in the assembly of the novel SARSCoV2:

"4. according to the DEFUSE proposal, there were plans to characterize and reconstruct SARS-like spikes, and to put them into nanoparticles. this construct may have been used to express the spike in e coli to
-test binding to hACE2
-produce spike for a bat vaccine"

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1695343263853449385 ?

The US biowarfare project which caused the Covid-19 debacle – Part 6
By Paula Jardine

"THE first of the final links in the chain of events that led up to the Wuhan lockdown and the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic was the refusal of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to fund the EcoHealth Alliance’s DEFUSE proposal because of concerns that it violated the moratorium on gain-of-function research imposed by the administration of President Obama in 2014. The second was the making of the asymptomatic transmission myth.

Purportedly to defuse the threat to humans from bat-borne coronaviruses, Dr Anthony Fauci, then director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) decided to fund the DEFUSE plan himself. To get around the moratorium on such research, the work was outsourced to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) whose researchers were in turn collaborating with the ‘Dr Strangelove’ of this tale, Dr Ralph Baric, the world-leading coronavirus expert based at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. 

Dr Baric wrote the section of the DEFUSE proposal that gave rise to DARPA’s concerns that it amounted to gain-of-function work. He further assisted Moderna and the NIAID in December 2019 when he was tasked with running the animal testing of their prototype coronavirus vaccine. (The emergency use authorisation of remdesivir as a Covid-19 treatment in May 2020 may have been a reward to Baric for his assistance – he helped to develop it for Gilead Sciences and could well earn royalties on it. One pharmacologist wrote to the BMJ saying it was a drug least likely to be a safe treatment for Covid. Oddly, the WIV also applied for a Chinese patent on remdesivir as a Covid treatment on January 21, 2020.)

In a letter to Congressional Republicans, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), of which NIAID is a part, denied that the EcoHealth/NIH funded research at the WIV amounted to gain-of-function research that would make coronaviruses more dangerous to humans, while simultaneously admitting that Wuhan experiments had unexpectedly made it more infectious in mice. The WIV researchers have been criticised for conducting their research in a Level 2 biosafety lab but if they were working on a bat coronavirus vaccine, as called for in the DEFUSE proposal, they may have thought a top security Level 4 biosafety lab unnecessary.

Dr Michael Callahan, a former DARPA employee and longtime associate of Dr Robert Kadlec, the architect of the biodefence ‘Manhattan Project’, was in China in January 2020 as reports of a new virus broke. Dr Robert Malone, who played a foundational role in developing the mRNA technology on which the vaccines are based and who has long acquaintance with the American intelligence community, says Callahan rang him from China on January 4, 2020. He just happened to be there, according to Brendan Borrell’s book First Shots, collaborating with Chinese associates on avian flu research."

Read more:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-us-biowarfare-project-which-caused-the-covid-19-debacle-part-6/

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1695349440775705087

I know Paula personally and had a long conversation about all the findings above months ago now.

I have no doubts as to her integrity and ability in unmasking the real story of Covid19.

@RobinMG

Paula's analysis:
https://t.me/robinmg/29798

Covid deaths by vaccination status, England, 2023

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1695353743095501041