Returning to the letter, I notice you have commented on questioning the role of Sars-Cov-2 as a bioweapon, so again my intention was to raise these points and ask for your opinion on them.  
 
7. Finally, the letter aimed to convey what I believe is a different and useful way of thinking about the 'pandemic' in terms of looking beyond arguably over-simplistic binary 'real vs fake' conclusions, and examining a more complex array of both 'real and fake' aspects occurring. Relating to this concept, I will refer to and comment on your summary of the 'establishment pandemic narrative':
         
"The establishment pandemic narrative is that:

(1) a NOVEL and (2) LETHAL virus (3) EMERGED FROM WUHAN, (4) SPREAD ACROSS THE WORLD thereby (5) DIRECTLY causing (6) MORE DEATHS than the usual mix of respiratory pathogens.

Either what we were told is true or it isn't.  For it to be true, every part has to be true. There's no half-way house here.

If any of the 6 parts of the story are false, we need to look elsewhere when trying to write the history of what happened in 2020.

You seem to want to discourage people from doing that, which I don't understand.

As for the interrogation about other people's views, please ask them.  I have set out my view - including the limits of what I think we know and don't know."

Regarding the main points, I think I've explained my views towards these generally, though there is of course many more aspects that could be discussed in greater depth and detail. On the 'what we were told is true or it isn't' question, my quick answer is - of course it's not all true, it's mostly 'fake'! Mixed with elements that are 'real'. Covid has been one of the biggest, if not the biggest propaganda operation in history! Brought to you by the producers of 9/11 and the 'War on Terrorism'. Flipping the script from the spectre of ISIS to the 'bond movie' like villain WEF frontman Klaus Schwab who is overtly open about the conveniently timed plans to transform societies towards 'technocracy' agendas via the Covid operation. Blackrock's 'Going Direct' financial strategies, corporate sector and Big Tech gains, 'wealth transfer' and the economic warfare of lockdowns were a key part also.

These presentations provide far more details in the context of 9/11 as a useful frame of reference:

Parallels between 9/11 and Covid – Kevin Ryan
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sibEg8S9KU8i/

Richard Gage: 9/11, COVID9/11, & Crime Scene to Courtroom
https://rumble.com/v2t6b8u-richard-gage-911-covid911-and-crime-scene-to-courtroom.html

Paul Schreyer: Pandemic simulation games – Preparation for a new era?
https://wissen-ist-relevant.de/vortrage/paul-schreyer-pandemic-simulation-games-preparation-for-a-new-era/

Of course the threats of infection, lethality and fatalities etc. were massively exaggerated by media disinformation, data manipulation and so on to ramp up the fear levels to extremes, force through authoritarian lockdowns, policies and 'create demand' for the vaccines, of which were the second phase and main target of the operation. The first phase being the Sars-Cov-2 bio-agent, of which knowledge of the lab origins, timelines, circulations etc. as was touched upon is limited at present.

This was further exploited by co-ordinated 'catalytic events' such as in NYC, Bergamo, Madrid etc. that were needed to launch the planned 'global response', as 'Event 201' event set the stage for along with a number of other previous 'simulations'. In very broad terms, the 'real' effects of Sars-Cov-2 provided the necessary scientific/medical basis, though again events were manipulated of course. However, there were significant public health impacts in various countries, further compounded by the impacts of lockdowns, medical mistreatment and suppression of early treatments. Also, on top of this were many pre-planned 'fake' aspects such as mass-testing and data manipulation that played a central role in inflating fatality and 'case' numbers for creating false perceptions of a 'pandemic'.

As you well know there are of many more angles and details to cover, but I hope that's enough to give you an outline of the hypothesis I am proposing, also in regards to explaining the concept of analysing both 'real' and 'fake' aspects. So yes I agree, the 'establishment narratives' are mostly misleading and false, as are the aims of psychological propaganda operations, and yes there is a 'need to look elsewhere', while thinking about the overall situation differently as I have argued.  

I am not 'discouraging people' people to consider your views, but I am questioning them as in the spirit of proper investigative journalism, scientific enquiry and public debate, of which is not often practiced in the media. I'm not going to simply agree with everything and ask 'softball' questions, but ask difficult and important questions than need to be discussed for getting closer to the truth, raising public awareness and ultimately preventing these crimes from happening again in future.
   
I have copied in a number of relevant professionals to encourage wider public debate on the issues.

Sincerely,
Jonathan Hall"

There’s an anonymous person calling themselves “Transcriber B”, who selects what they judge to be important interviews or statements & does their best to create a readable written version.
Thank you, Transcriber B!
Readers will notice that only a year ago, I held different views than I now do about the alleged virus.
It doesn’t change the thrust of the piece, because the criticisms of official responses would, if anything, be much more robust today than say back in 2022.
We’ve all been lied to and then intentionally harmed and some killed by the alleged vaccines.
There’s a zero % chance that this is sheer bad luck.
No. It’s intentional. I have no doubt whatsoever about that.
In the unlikely event that anyone is on the fence & might be persuaded by written argument, please consider sending them this.
With best wishes
Mike

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/32387.html

I don’t know whether you can read this article, hence the meat of it is copied below.

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Brown warned that climate scientists often used irrelevant metrics to create “eye-popping numbers” or used time periods that are not relevant to modern societies.

And he said he had discovered it was “taboo” to mention that global warming was often mitigated by changes in technology and resilience.

“The first thing the astute climate researcher knows is that his or her work should support the mainstream narrative,” he said.

“Why did I focus exclusively on the impact of climate change? I wanted the research to get as widely disseminated as possible, and thus I wanted it to be published in a high-impact journal.

“When I had previously attempted to deviate from the formula I outlined here, my papers were promptly rejected out of hand by the editors of high-profile journals without even going to peer review.”

He added: “This type of framing, where the influence of climate change is unrealistically considered in isolation, is the norm for high-profile research papers.

“It is standard practice to calculate impacts for scary hypothetical future warming scenarios that strain credibility while ignoring potential changes to technology and resilience that would lessen the impact.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230907092122/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/06/global-warming-climate-change-scientist-unrealistic-nature/

So, the disinformation specialist lied on her CV.

Her explanation?

“She said her only explanation was her 'desperation to report out in Moscow' and thinking it would 'wouldn't be a big deal', which she admitted was 'naïve and stupid'.”

In other words, she thought lying was fine so long as it helped her accomplish her goals.

Best wishes
Mike

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12493713/BBCs-disinformation-correspondent-chief-fact-checker-Marianna-Spring-accused-lying-CV-falsely-claiming-worked-Beeb-journalist-applying-job-Moscow.html

This is genuinely terrifying.
Our current home had an electrical smart meter which I have been unable to persuade the supplier to remove. They’ve also lied to me about this.

Looks like the authorities can use force to enter your home in order to install smart meters.
It’s scarcely believable, Isn’t it?
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/uncut/p/power-to-forcefully-enter-your-home

Letter to Conservative MPs about the Energy Bill
This is a list of how MPs voted in the final debate of the Energy Bill on 5th September 2023 - https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/1628. If your MP is on this list as having voted the Energy Bill through, the following is a letter you will probably want to send them.
Labour did not vote, which is an appalling dereliction of duty given the ramifications of the bill on ordinary working people. You will therefore need to adjust your letter accordingly and ask them why they failed in their role as opposition party.
__________________________________________________________
Dear [Name of (Conservative) MP],

I can only assume that you haven’t read the Energy Bill because the alternative would mean that you support the criminalisation of the use of energy which surely is not the case? Or perhaps I am wrong and you did, in fact, spend your summer break reading and digesting in excess of 400 pages of legalise (over 1000 pages if referenced legislation was also read). Just in case my initial assumption is correct, I’ve highlighted a few of the most concerning clauses below.

Clause 235: energy smart appliances (fridges, dishwashers, washers, heaters, air conditioners, electric vehicle charge points). The paragraph states that the smart function of such appliances is “capable of operating in response to load control signs from any person carrying out load control” i.e. the government can hand control of smart domestic appliances to anyone they wish to carry out load control thereby giving them the ability to control the supply of energy into the home. Perhaps now it becomes apparent why "conspiracy theorists" like me have advocated to stay clear of electric cars and smart meters!

Clause 248: ‘Sanctions” provides for a fine of up to £15,000 and imprisonment up to 12 months if a person falls foul of any future regulations with respect to energy reduction/consumption levels imposed by the government of the day. In addition, people can be prosecuted for providing “false information” about energy efficiency/consumption or “obstruction of an enforcement authority”.

Elsewhere in the Bill it is provided that authorities will be allowed to use “reasonable force” to enter homes and properties to assess the status of “smart meters”. “Requiring persons to supply evidence of their compliance to enforcement authorities; conferring powers of entry, including by reasonable force.” Here’s me thinking I have a right to respect for private and family life. Oh, but wait…. that’s another right that is “qualified” so in fact it means nothing at all - as proven by this Bill.

The Energy Bill has its foundations in the United Nations Agenda 2030. I have been writing to you for several months about the dangers of such unelected, unaccountable, supranational organisations that put the interests of private wealth ahead of the interests of the people you are supposed to represent - none of my concerns have ever been addressed adequately. The climate “crisis” (central to achieving Agenda 2030 goals) that gives rise to the “net zero" policies which underpin the Energy Bill is manufactured and thus fraudulent. Once again, in the UK, we are witnessing the silencing of those holding opinions counter to the position of the government (i.e. the position of the United Nations). There are many scientists who maintain that changes to CO2 levels have little to no influence on Earth’s temperature yet you have agreed to an Energy Bill that creates a totalitarian regime affording the government unprecedented powers to intrude in people’s lives all while wrecking what’s left of the UK economy for a problem that doesn’t even exist. The Energy Bill is merely the latest example of the attempt to usher in a one world government.

I remind you of the democratic principle that elected national governments are responsible and accountable to their own people and urge you to do all you can to ensure that the abhorrent Energy Bill is scrapped.

Best regards,
[Your name]
[Your address]

One of the purple passages in Brian's third Léon Krier interview is his experiences on President Mitterrand's council of wise men charged with deciding whether or not to double the population of Paris.

All the economists around the table said mais bien sûr because a Parisian generates more wealth than a provincial Frenchman. Krier alone replied, "If we follow that logic, why not depopulate the whole country and stick them in Paris?"

ukcolumn.org/video/leon-krier-looks-at-linear-super-city-neom

River of Freedom Wellington Premiere

The Resistance Kiwi crew attended the Wellington premiere of River of Freedom last night. It was great to see so many familiar faces and a full house.

Stephen Franks has written a short piece on his thoughts about the documentary and the protest in general:

https://twitter.com/franks_lawyer/status/1699736358296977523?cxt=HBwW5oHcgcvN1pYvAAAA

The documentary is a riveting watch, with some wonderfully humorous moments despite the subject, and this Resistance Kiwi learnt some things that he wasn’t previously aware of.

Get out and see it; and better still, try to get those who were fed government propaganda to go. One attendee who was not involved in the protests, cried throughout the film and said she’d never seen any of it from the MSM.

Posted by Mysteron for Resistance Kiwi

🙌 Thank you to all 757 amazing people who attended our SOLD OUT Premiere Screening of River of Freedom at the Embassy Theatre in Wellington last night!! So great to bring the film home to where it all took place ❤️

Apologies to those who couldn’t get tickets, the film is now screening in Wellington at the Empire Cinema, Island Bay
👉https://riveroffreedom.nz/index.php/screening/

Photos by Mark Lapwood

Sean Plunket Reviews River of Freedom Documentary

"I think it should be compulsory viewing in schools . . . I want to commend all the people involved in making the movie, you've done this country a service, and I reckon the movie, in time, will become a classic."


https://youtu.be/QtUyYrjXZuM?si=uRjzbAXYnyyx4xkT

https://safertowait.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/STW_HPV.pdf

Another summary, this time about the HPV “vaccines” from the child-centred campaign group, Safer To Wait.

I agree. Like 20 years.

Best wishes
Mike

As we plunge👆🏼 into the next phase of the global coup d'etat and perpetual jab scam, let's peek at some of the revolving doors of corruption between Government and corporations with the former jab shill turned ace medical truth sleuth.

WO' IS GOING ON HERE?
Montage on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/WO%27-IS-GOING-ON-HERE:8

Piercing the scams of the medical charlatans with
hEuRiSTiC mOnTaGe
by
@freedomtirade

Robin Monotti on The Freeman Report with James Freeman - 7 September 2023

https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/robin-monotti-on-the-freeman-report-with-james-freeman-7-september-2023/

I talked to James Freeman about the New Zealand release of River of Freedom film, and about why we should keep our focus on the issue of freedom and human rights, rather than get sidetracked by arguments which will only give ammunition to those who already suspect us of being irrational conspiracy theorists who can't hold a rational conversation which covers all sides respectfully.

"What an amazing premiere week we've had of our film River of Freedom. This has only been possible because of your support. Ngā mihi nui, thank you very much!
We're continuing to work hard to get the film into cinemas throughout New Zealand. More are coming on everyday, please keep an eye on our website - this is where we update new cinemas immediately: https://riveroffreedom.nz/index.php/screenings/
Please check out our film's IMDb page. This is where we grow our international presence to help with release worldwide. If you managed to make it to a premiere or one of the opening nights at your local cinema this weekend, please write a review - and make sure you tag us #RiverofFreedom"

@River_Of_Freedom

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/FreedomFilm/premiere-week-success?s=09

"For those who missed it, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has now publicly acknowledged that Putin made clear to NATO in a draft treaty before the war that it could avert it if NATO agreed not to keep enlarging. But NATO rejected the offer." - Max Abrahms, Professor of International Security


NATO - Opinion: Remarks by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at joint committee meeting at the European Parliament, 07-Sep.-2023
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_218172.htm#:~:text=The%20background%20was%20that%20President,condition%20for%20not%20invade%20Ukraine

A Short Scientific History of Climate Change:
Or on Why it Has NOTHING to do with CO2

COPERNICUS & GALILEO: "The Sun is at the centre of our planetary system, not the Earth"

NEWTON: "The Sun is not static, it is subject to the gravitational pull of the planets: it wobbles."

ZHARKHOVA, SCAFETTA & BIANCHINI: "The Sun's wobble is what cause short term climate change on Earth".

That is in the short term. In the long term it's the Milankovitch Cycles.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1700439063747059795

The Sun's wobble is VERY slow. It wobbles by the maximum length of two diameters of the Sun. This is the pattern over 76 years, from 1944 to 2020.