"Pandemic" emotional manipulation

2020-22: If you don't abide to government restrictions and inject yourself with whatever we say, you are killing grandma.

2023-24: If you don't abide to government restrictions and inject yourself with whatever we say, you are killing the children.

Watch this space.

@RobinMG

SCHOOL BUILDING CLOSURES

The questions on #RAAC are:

-It started failing in the 80s

-Reports published in the 90s

-WHY CLOSE SCHOOLS NOW?

https://t.me/robinmg/30130

Protecting HVAC systems from bio-terrorism - PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12921015/

"The FBI, in the wake of the September 11 attacks, issued an advisory to state and local law enforcement authorities and the public asking to remain especially alert to any unusual activities around ventilation systems. It noted that while the Bureau possessed no specific threats regarding the release of toxic chemicals into air handling systems, building owners and managers should be well-aware of the potential for contamination of such systems."

THE MILANKOVITCH CYCLES
The explanation for very long term climate change.
Variations and schematic diagrams of Milankovitch cycles.

1 a, Precession and precessional index with a periodicity of ~23,000 years, with the amplitude of the cycles modulated at eccentricity periods of 100,000 years and 413,000 years (“variability packets”).

2 b, The tilt of the Earth’s axis with a periodicity of 41,000 years.

3 c, The eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit with periodicities of 100,000 and 413,000 years.

d, Present position of the Earth in its orbit at different times of the year.

e, Position of the Earth in its orbit at different times of year ~11,000 years in the future.

© 2012 Nature Education Graph reproduced from Kingston 2005, diagrams a–c reproduced from Lutgens & Tarbuck 2001, d–e reproduced from PhysicalGeography .net. All rights reserved. 

TWO LEADING PRINCETON, MIT SCIENTISTS SAY EPA CLIMATE REGULATIONS BASED ON A ‘HOAX’:

"William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations aren’t based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.

“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen wrote. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.

“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data. The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”

Climate models such as the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. To illustrate his point, he presented the EPA with a table showing the difference between those models’ predictions and the observed data."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/two-princeton-mit-scientists-say-epa-climate-regulations-based-on-a-hoax-5460699

WHAT IS BIOURBANISM?

A world in which societies are ruled by the official technoscience of the day as opposed to moral & ethical values is called a techno-scientific dystopia. This was one of the main subjects of the Biourbanism seminars with Prof Sergio Los in 2019.

@RobinMG

WHAT IS BIOURBANISM?

-Biourbanism opposes the domination of techno-sciences and favours art as knowledge and not as aesthetic entertainment;

-Builds peace, as opposite to the industrial city, which provides for competitiveness, conflict, and, in the end, war;

-Reconnects people to place, landscape, and bioclimatic specificity;

-Is based on biological dynamics as opposed to technological dynamics;

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2019/08/13/the-manifesto-of-biourbanism/

Oggi si fa leva sulla credulità delle persone.
Ci raccontano l'autorità come benevolente (es. "Draghi che fa il bene dell'Italia"), ma non è così e la gente, indottrinata dalla tv e amante delle "storie positive", non riesce a vederlo

Robin Monotti sul potere della narrativa usata per condizionare e dirigere.

Today people's gullibility is being exploited.

They tell us that authority is benevolent (e.g. "Draghi who wants the best for Italy"), but it is not like that and people, indoctrinated by TV and lovers of "positive stories", are unable to see it.

Robin Monotti on the power of narrative used to condition and direct people.

https://t.me/robinmg/30139

Peace, War and 9/11 (full film)

In this captivating documentary filmed six months before his passing, eminent scholar and lifelong peace activist Graeme MacQueen shares his final words on 9/11, the 2001 anthrax attacks, and the goal of abolishing war. Peace, War and 9/11 is a production of the International Center for 9/11 Justice (https://IC911.org). It is directed by Ted Walter and Richard Heap. Executive producers are Ted Walter and Marilyn Langlois. It is distributed by Questar Entertainment/Hipstr.

This video

Rumble
https://rumble.com/v3gh9qz-war-peace-and-911-full-film.html

Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LLSKVlcmzpfc/

You Tube
https://youtu.be/GJmUtUfDrU0

Twitter
https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1700794197698281745

Milan, the photos that embarrass Palazzo Marino: the exhibition in the center on the neo-Nazis of the Azov Battalion: “It should have been on the Ukrainian resistance in Mariupol”
https://news.italy24.press/local/847876.html

https://x.com/kristinadawn7/status/1698500481125961915?s=52&t=WSMLCQNckomGtNidcKiTmw

To those who may, for example, hear me speaking about what definitely classifies as conspiracy (a plan involving injecting billions of people with materials which are intentionally harmful) & object, saying “That’s not possible, because thousands of people would have to know about it and some would leak that information”, please listen to Anne Machon, who we’re told is a former MI5 officer.

I echo her point that very few people would know the entire picture. Because there is a nested set of plausible explanations for the desire to inject large numbers of people, I think it’s unlikely that more than a tiny number of people do know the entire plot. For all I know, I’m one of them, in my case, partly by listening to what we were told & realising it must be lies and partly through deduction, having stood in the shoes of a person in charge of drug discovery programs and experienced in the method used, so-called “rational drug design”. When I do that, put myself in their place and look at what was done, I work backwards from the outcome, which tells me about some of the decisions made. I am absolutely confident that, on several occasions, the only way you end up with these gene-based injections is if your intention was to cause injury, to maim & to kill.

How many people would have to know, not guess, what was intended? I could make the argument that it would not have to be more than two. For the whole industry, not per company. That person has to elect to choose the entire mRNA sequence encoding the piece of the genetic sequence of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus that is now called “the spike protein”.
The use of modified RNA residues is another decision. Electing to formulate in lipid nanoparticles is another.
Dose selection is, to me, a complete unknown. I would have no basis to choose 30 nanograms or 30 milligrams (that’s a million-fold range), so other information must have been available to inform that choice.
The second person is the sounding board for each of the design choices that would have had to be made.

Now, in practise, I’m sure many more people had a hand in designing the gene-based vaccines. But it’s not a large number of people by any means.

Note, two we’re told are DNA-based, and two were mRNA-based. I did wonder, during late-2021, whether the AZ & JNJ products were always something of a pair of decoys, because they were being brought down by regulatory actions that should have equally applied to Pfizer’s & Moderna’s products, yet not an official word was said against these. And what are we told are being built around the world? “Manufacturing plants for mRNA-based vaccines”.

Best wishes
Mike

A message written to a trusted campaigning friend, who is struggling to accept that what is happening is intentional. It is indeed a big step to move from justifiable criticism of presumed incompetent politicians and industrialists to putting the pieces together in such a way that they can point only to intentionality. See what you think.

Best wishes
Mike

Dear X,
I find that attempting to put all the information together in such a way as to allow for the whole even to be benign or at least not wholly malevolent is impossible.
That’s because, as you’ve no doubt heard me say, I believe it is malevolent!
I too struggled early on, arguing “surely they must have known this!?” Etc.
Once I allowed for the possibility that all the bad things were intentional, I find all the rest falls into place. Obviously that alone doesn’t prove that it was intentional.
Some early clues to intentionality are the coordinated responses of scores of governments to the alleged pandemic: lockdowns, masking, mass testing of the well, the misapplication of PCR-based techniques to bulk testing of clinical samples, selective business & school closures, border restrictions etc.
Not a single country had any of this as a core part of their own pandemic preparedness plan.
Even the WHO’s scientific evaluation of NPIs concluded none of them worked & the only changes worth a dime were asking those with symptoms to remain at home until recovered & to increase the frequency of hand washing (because the route of transmission wouldn’t initially be known for sure).
I argued at the time that the only way all the countries could have adopted all these useless yet damaging & costly NPIs is if there was supranational coordination.
Whether that from WHO, WEF etc I don’t know. But illegitimate in any case.
We now know that they knew that imposing these restrictions would save nobody, yet the negative consequences would be devastating, even lethal for some, who would no longer have access to the medical care they needed. Additionally, the use of furlough was obviously going to be enormously damaging to sovereigns who were already borrowed to the hilt.
I note the widespread adoption of an American term, furlough, into public discourse. In U.K. we never previously used the term. Nobody remarked on its arrival, which telegraphed the leading role played by Americans.
Then we have the imposition of radically altered medical protocols. 
Because of my long exposure to matters respiratory, I knew immediately they began panicking about needed 30,000 mechanical ventilators that something truly demonic was at hand. It’s never appropriate, in a patient with an unobstructed airway & an intact chest wall to sedate, intubate and ventilate them. Mechanical ventilation is certainly a marvellous, life-saving thing, but it comes with serious risks to the frail patient, in the form of ventilator acquired pneumonia, lung injury from use of pressure to inflate the lungs and more. The appropriate treatment would be an oxygen mask, single, low dose benzo, a cup of tea and a biscuit and a caring hand upon an arm. 
In the USA as well many, once in this vulnerable state, were given remdesivir & not given total, intravenous nutrition. In most cases it was just a matter of time before they died.
In care homes, there was indiscriminate use of inappropriately high doses of midazolam and morphine. Not only high doses but repeatedly given to their elderly charges. They’d been told to do it by the highest medical authorities in the land and so few questioned it. My PhD by coincidence was in this area, the effect of opiates on respiratory function. The discovery of multiple opiate receptors raised the possibility that it might be possible to invent receptor selective ligands that would relieve pain with reduced respiratory depression. Unfortunately, both are mediated primarily by mu opiate receptors, both centrally and in the periphery.
The combination of opiate agonists and benzodiazepines is contraindicated in patients unless close monitoring (for signs of respiratory depression) was in place.

It isn’t & cannot be in a care home. They too were murdered in large numbers.
Finally, in the community, the family doctors were cautioned not to prescribe antibiotics in cases of covid “because antibiotics cannot treat viral illnesses”. It’s well known that what is usually termed secondary bacterial infection is generally what actually leads to death in this situation. However, the records show that prescriptions for antibiotics for suspected bacterial infection of the lungs fell by 50% & large numbers of people died avoidable deaths (and rather horrible deaths, too). 
It’s not possible to regard all of this evidence without concluding that malice aforethought was at work here. It’s literally diabolical, what they did.
How it was done with so little pushback still confuses me. I do know that from the late-1990s right through late-2019, there was a sequence of tabletop simulations of global pandemic scenarios & bioterrorism scenarios, which allowed the perpetrators to hone their craft in the responses & control measures imposed. I believe some of these were translated onto the ground, giving emergency response team a chance to form & to rehearse what most of them thought were appropriate, given the fictional set up, though this is speculative.
Then we come to the “vaccines”. Given a career in pharma and biotech, I knew that it was impossible to create a vaccine in under 5-6 years if they were going to demonstrate clinical safety and hone manufacturing to yield the customarily high quality manufacturing necessary to produce tightly defined final drug product. If the latter if not done, it’s pointless doing the former, because what would otherwise be injected wouldn’t be what had been used in the clinical trials.
In other words, if there was a need for a new vaccine, you would never even contemplate running such a program, because no pandemic in history lasts a fraction of the minimum time necessary to create a safe and effective new vaccine.
Yet they went ahead. This too is malevolent, let alone the extraordinary lying, censorship & smearing of dissenters.
Given my entire career used “rational drug design” principles to design and test molecules, I was able to put myself in the shoes of the designers of the jabs.
There are several, completely obvious safety issues built into these products.
One is the axiomatic induction of “autoimmune” responses, regardless of which antigen was selected.
The next was choice of antigen, where no one would pick spike protein, because it was highly likely to be directly toxic, it’s subject to the most rapid mutation (so a vaccine might lose efficacy) & also it’s the least different from human proteins (and so might trigger bystander attacks on even somewhat similar self proteins).
Yet all four leading players chose this antigen. What a coincidence! I’d have called up my peers in the other companies to endure we didn’t do that. That’s because it would be highly undesirable to have common risks to all programs.
On formulation, the mRNA-based products both selected LNPs to encapsulate their message. Yet there was industry knowledge that these not only travel all over the body including into the brain but that they accumulate in the ovaries. 
Yet, knowing this, the companies & regulators went ahead and then others compounded the toxicity risk by recommending these injections in pregnant women and children.
I was still slow to piece together all this evidence of carefully thought out harms. But eventually I got there are have been speaking in what many regard as extreme terms ever since.
I’m afraid there’s no hiding from the reality that this is a global coup d’etat and intentional mass murder.
Worse, we see the encroachment of surveillance technology and legal powers to introduce digital ID & CBDC as well as to eliminate cash.
It’s not difficult to come up with scenarios where presentation of digital ID will become mandatory.

All that’s needed is for WHO to invent fake pandemics, for pharma to manufacture billions of doses of mRNA based fake vaccines and for governments to insist that digital IDs will remain valid only if you accede to these injurious jabs, and there’s a near perfect depopulation tool with plausible deniability.
They may do other things too, but I think they are going to try this.
We must keep speaking out and trying to wake people up.
It’s only takes a substantial minority to say NO & these diabolical plans fail.
With best wishes 
Mike 

Dr Mike Yeadon

🌞FREE podcast #34 Judith Curry: "AR 6 (assessment report) admitted that the estimates are exaggerated. Science has nothing to say whether warming is good for the planet or not. Political assessments are made, not scientific."
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipo A well-known American climatologist and author of the book "Climate Uncertainties and Risk" talks about the real scientific reasons for climate change. The whole interview can be explained with one sentence: "When you mix science and politics you get politics".
You can buy the book here
https://blackwells.co.uk/.../Climate.../9781839989254
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://bit.ly/YouTubeSLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/

Dr Judith Curry’s climate science credentials are outstanding. Here, she summarises the most recent IPCC scientific working group reports.
An important retelling which the public never gets to hear, because it’s the executive summary that features on the news. The scientific working group summaries issue SIX MONTHS LATER.
Best wishes
Mike

https://t.me/robinmg/30148

TABLETOP EXERCISE

"Catastrophic Contagion"

"Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people."

Catastrophic Contagion
https://catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org/

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692844974461616578

CATASTROPHIC CONTAGION:

On October 23, 2022, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion; a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium.

These are the same organisations that played out Event 201 almost three years ago to the day.

Catastrophic Contagion simulated a new Enterovirus originating near Brazil. The virus has a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affects children.

Lessons from the exercise: "Countries should prioritise efforts to increase trust in government and public health; improve public health communication efforts; increase the resiliency of populations to misleading information; and reduce the spread of harmful misinformation"

Source