https://x.com/kristinadawn7/status/1698500481125961915?s=52&t=WSMLCQNckomGtNidcKiTmw
To those who may, for example, hear me speaking about what definitely classifies as conspiracy (a plan involving injecting billions of people with materials which are intentionally harmful) & object, saying “That’s not possible, because thousands of people would have to know about it and some would leak that information”, please listen to Anne Machon, who we’re told is a former MI5 officer.
I echo her point that very few people would know the entire picture. Because there is a nested set of plausible explanations for the desire to inject large numbers of people, I think it’s unlikely that more than a tiny number of people do know the entire plot. For all I know, I’m one of them, in my case, partly by listening to what we were told & realising it must be lies and partly through deduction, having stood in the shoes of a person in charge of drug discovery programs and experienced in the method used, so-called “rational drug design”. When I do that, put myself in their place and look at what was done, I work backwards from the outcome, which tells me about some of the decisions made. I am absolutely confident that, on several occasions, the only way you end up with these gene-based injections is if your intention was to cause injury, to maim & to kill.
How many people would have to know, not guess, what was intended? I could make the argument that it would not have to be more than two. For the whole industry, not per company. That person has to elect to choose the entire mRNA sequence encoding the piece of the genetic sequence of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus that is now called “the spike protein”.
The use of modified RNA residues is another decision. Electing to formulate in lipid nanoparticles is another.
Dose selection is, to me, a complete unknown. I would have no basis to choose 30 nanograms or 30 milligrams (that’s a million-fold range), so other information must have been available to inform that choice.
The second person is the sounding board for each of the design choices that would have had to be made.
Now, in practise, I’m sure many more people had a hand in designing the gene-based vaccines. But it’s not a large number of people by any means.
Note, two we’re told are DNA-based, and two were mRNA-based. I did wonder, during late-2021, whether the AZ & JNJ products were always something of a pair of decoys, because they were being brought down by regulatory actions that should have equally applied to Pfizer’s & Moderna’s products, yet not an official word was said against these. And what are we told are being built around the world? “Manufacturing plants for mRNA-based vaccines”.
Best wishes
Mike
To those who may, for example, hear me speaking about what definitely classifies as conspiracy (a plan involving injecting billions of people with materials which are intentionally harmful) & object, saying “That’s not possible, because thousands of people would have to know about it and some would leak that information”, please listen to Anne Machon, who we’re told is a former MI5 officer.
I echo her point that very few people would know the entire picture. Because there is a nested set of plausible explanations for the desire to inject large numbers of people, I think it’s unlikely that more than a tiny number of people do know the entire plot. For all I know, I’m one of them, in my case, partly by listening to what we were told & realising it must be lies and partly through deduction, having stood in the shoes of a person in charge of drug discovery programs and experienced in the method used, so-called “rational drug design”. When I do that, put myself in their place and look at what was done, I work backwards from the outcome, which tells me about some of the decisions made. I am absolutely confident that, on several occasions, the only way you end up with these gene-based injections is if your intention was to cause injury, to maim & to kill.
How many people would have to know, not guess, what was intended? I could make the argument that it would not have to be more than two. For the whole industry, not per company. That person has to elect to choose the entire mRNA sequence encoding the piece of the genetic sequence of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus that is now called “the spike protein”.
The use of modified RNA residues is another decision. Electing to formulate in lipid nanoparticles is another.
Dose selection is, to me, a complete unknown. I would have no basis to choose 30 nanograms or 30 milligrams (that’s a million-fold range), so other information must have been available to inform that choice.
The second person is the sounding board for each of the design choices that would have had to be made.
Now, in practise, I’m sure many more people had a hand in designing the gene-based vaccines. But it’s not a large number of people by any means.
Note, two we’re told are DNA-based, and two were mRNA-based. I did wonder, during late-2021, whether the AZ & JNJ products were always something of a pair of decoys, because they were being brought down by regulatory actions that should have equally applied to Pfizer’s & Moderna’s products, yet not an official word was said against these. And what are we told are being built around the world? “Manufacturing plants for mRNA-based vaccines”.
Best wishes
Mike
X (formerly Twitter)
KristinaDawn (@KristinaDawn7) on X
@RWMaloneMD @wideawake_media Surely you’re aware Covid = USA Military/Intelligence project towards global regime change.
Compartmentalization + #PlausibleDeniability + stacked purposes = standard operating procedure.
Intelligence whistleblowers have talked…
Compartmentalization + #PlausibleDeniability + stacked purposes = standard operating procedure.
Intelligence whistleblowers have talked…
👍73❤26👏3💯3🔥1
A message written to a trusted campaigning friend, who is struggling to accept that what is happening is intentional. It is indeed a big step to move from justifiable criticism of presumed incompetent politicians and industrialists to putting the pieces together in such a way that they can point only to intentionality. See what you think.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear X,
I find that attempting to put all the information together in such a way as to allow for the whole even to be benign or at least not wholly malevolent is impossible.
That’s because, as you’ve no doubt heard me say, I believe it is malevolent!
I too struggled early on, arguing “surely they must have known this!?” Etc.
Once I allowed for the possibility that all the bad things were intentional, I find all the rest falls into place. Obviously that alone doesn’t prove that it was intentional.
Some early clues to intentionality are the coordinated responses of scores of governments to the alleged pandemic: lockdowns, masking, mass testing of the well, the misapplication of PCR-based techniques to bulk testing of clinical samples, selective business & school closures, border restrictions etc.
Not a single country had any of this as a core part of their own pandemic preparedness plan.
Even the WHO’s scientific evaluation of NPIs concluded none of them worked & the only changes worth a dime were asking those with symptoms to remain at home until recovered & to increase the frequency of hand washing (because the route of transmission wouldn’t initially be known for sure).
I argued at the time that the only way all the countries could have adopted all these useless yet damaging & costly NPIs is if there was supranational coordination.
Whether that from WHO, WEF etc I don’t know. But illegitimate in any case.
We now know that they knew that imposing these restrictions would save nobody, yet the negative consequences would be devastating, even lethal for some, who would no longer have access to the medical care they needed. Additionally, the use of furlough was obviously going to be enormously damaging to sovereigns who were already borrowed to the hilt.
I note the widespread adoption of an American term, furlough, into public discourse. In U.K. we never previously used the term. Nobody remarked on its arrival, which telegraphed the leading role played by Americans.
Then we have the imposition of radically altered medical protocols.
Because of my long exposure to matters respiratory, I knew immediately they began panicking about needed 30,000 mechanical ventilators that something truly demonic was at hand. It’s never appropriate, in a patient with an unobstructed airway & an intact chest wall to sedate, intubate and ventilate them. Mechanical ventilation is certainly a marvellous, life-saving thing, but it comes with serious risks to the frail patient, in the form of ventilator acquired pneumonia, lung injury from use of pressure to inflate the lungs and more. The appropriate treatment would be an oxygen mask, single, low dose benzo, a cup of tea and a biscuit and a caring hand upon an arm.
In the USA as well many, once in this vulnerable state, were given remdesivir & not given total, intravenous nutrition. In most cases it was just a matter of time before they died.
In care homes, there was indiscriminate use of inappropriately high doses of midazolam and morphine. Not only high doses but repeatedly given to their elderly charges. They’d been told to do it by the highest medical authorities in the land and so few questioned it. My PhD by coincidence was in this area, the effect of opiates on respiratory function. The discovery of multiple opiate receptors raised the possibility that it might be possible to invent receptor selective ligands that would relieve pain with reduced respiratory depression. Unfortunately, both are mediated primarily by mu opiate receptors, both centrally and in the periphery.
The combination of opiate agonists and benzodiazepines is contraindicated in patients unless close monitoring (for signs of respiratory depression) was in place.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear X,
I find that attempting to put all the information together in such a way as to allow for the whole even to be benign or at least not wholly malevolent is impossible.
That’s because, as you’ve no doubt heard me say, I believe it is malevolent!
I too struggled early on, arguing “surely they must have known this!?” Etc.
Once I allowed for the possibility that all the bad things were intentional, I find all the rest falls into place. Obviously that alone doesn’t prove that it was intentional.
Some early clues to intentionality are the coordinated responses of scores of governments to the alleged pandemic: lockdowns, masking, mass testing of the well, the misapplication of PCR-based techniques to bulk testing of clinical samples, selective business & school closures, border restrictions etc.
Not a single country had any of this as a core part of their own pandemic preparedness plan.
Even the WHO’s scientific evaluation of NPIs concluded none of them worked & the only changes worth a dime were asking those with symptoms to remain at home until recovered & to increase the frequency of hand washing (because the route of transmission wouldn’t initially be known for sure).
I argued at the time that the only way all the countries could have adopted all these useless yet damaging & costly NPIs is if there was supranational coordination.
Whether that from WHO, WEF etc I don’t know. But illegitimate in any case.
We now know that they knew that imposing these restrictions would save nobody, yet the negative consequences would be devastating, even lethal for some, who would no longer have access to the medical care they needed. Additionally, the use of furlough was obviously going to be enormously damaging to sovereigns who were already borrowed to the hilt.
I note the widespread adoption of an American term, furlough, into public discourse. In U.K. we never previously used the term. Nobody remarked on its arrival, which telegraphed the leading role played by Americans.
Then we have the imposition of radically altered medical protocols.
Because of my long exposure to matters respiratory, I knew immediately they began panicking about needed 30,000 mechanical ventilators that something truly demonic was at hand. It’s never appropriate, in a patient with an unobstructed airway & an intact chest wall to sedate, intubate and ventilate them. Mechanical ventilation is certainly a marvellous, life-saving thing, but it comes with serious risks to the frail patient, in the form of ventilator acquired pneumonia, lung injury from use of pressure to inflate the lungs and more. The appropriate treatment would be an oxygen mask, single, low dose benzo, a cup of tea and a biscuit and a caring hand upon an arm.
In the USA as well many, once in this vulnerable state, were given remdesivir & not given total, intravenous nutrition. In most cases it was just a matter of time before they died.
In care homes, there was indiscriminate use of inappropriately high doses of midazolam and morphine. Not only high doses but repeatedly given to their elderly charges. They’d been told to do it by the highest medical authorities in the land and so few questioned it. My PhD by coincidence was in this area, the effect of opiates on respiratory function. The discovery of multiple opiate receptors raised the possibility that it might be possible to invent receptor selective ligands that would relieve pain with reduced respiratory depression. Unfortunately, both are mediated primarily by mu opiate receptors, both centrally and in the periphery.
The combination of opiate agonists and benzodiazepines is contraindicated in patients unless close monitoring (for signs of respiratory depression) was in place.
👍55❤32🔥12😁1
It isn’t & cannot be in a care home. They too were murdered in large numbers.
Finally, in the community, the family doctors were cautioned not to prescribe antibiotics in cases of covid “because antibiotics cannot treat viral illnesses”. It’s well known that what is usually termed secondary bacterial infection is generally what actually leads to death in this situation. However, the records show that prescriptions for antibiotics for suspected bacterial infection of the lungs fell by 50% & large numbers of people died avoidable deaths (and rather horrible deaths, too).
It’s not possible to regard all of this evidence without concluding that malice aforethought was at work here. It’s literally diabolical, what they did.
How it was done with so little pushback still confuses me. I do know that from the late-1990s right through late-2019, there was a sequence of tabletop simulations of global pandemic scenarios & bioterrorism scenarios, which allowed the perpetrators to hone their craft in the responses & control measures imposed. I believe some of these were translated onto the ground, giving emergency response team a chance to form & to rehearse what most of them thought were appropriate, given the fictional set up, though this is speculative.
Then we come to the “vaccines”. Given a career in pharma and biotech, I knew that it was impossible to create a vaccine in under 5-6 years if they were going to demonstrate clinical safety and hone manufacturing to yield the customarily high quality manufacturing necessary to produce tightly defined final drug product. If the latter if not done, it’s pointless doing the former, because what would otherwise be injected wouldn’t be what had been used in the clinical trials.
In other words, if there was a need for a new vaccine, you would never even contemplate running such a program, because no pandemic in history lasts a fraction of the minimum time necessary to create a safe and effective new vaccine.
Yet they went ahead. This too is malevolent, let alone the extraordinary lying, censorship & smearing of dissenters.
Given my entire career used “rational drug design” principles to design and test molecules, I was able to put myself in the shoes of the designers of the jabs.
There are several, completely obvious safety issues built into these products.
One is the axiomatic induction of “autoimmune” responses, regardless of which antigen was selected.
The next was choice of antigen, where no one would pick spike protein, because it was highly likely to be directly toxic, it’s subject to the most rapid mutation (so a vaccine might lose efficacy) & also it’s the least different from human proteins (and so might trigger bystander attacks on even somewhat similar self proteins).
Yet all four leading players chose this antigen. What a coincidence! I’d have called up my peers in the other companies to endure we didn’t do that. That’s because it would be highly undesirable to have common risks to all programs.
On formulation, the mRNA-based products both selected LNPs to encapsulate their message. Yet there was industry knowledge that these not only travel all over the body including into the brain but that they accumulate in the ovaries.
Yet, knowing this, the companies & regulators went ahead and then others compounded the toxicity risk by recommending these injections in pregnant women and children.
I was still slow to piece together all this evidence of carefully thought out harms. But eventually I got there are have been speaking in what many regard as extreme terms ever since.
I’m afraid there’s no hiding from the reality that this is a global coup d’etat and intentional mass murder.
Worse, we see the encroachment of surveillance technology and legal powers to introduce digital ID & CBDC as well as to eliminate cash.
It’s not difficult to come up with scenarios where presentation of digital ID will become mandatory.
Finally, in the community, the family doctors were cautioned not to prescribe antibiotics in cases of covid “because antibiotics cannot treat viral illnesses”. It’s well known that what is usually termed secondary bacterial infection is generally what actually leads to death in this situation. However, the records show that prescriptions for antibiotics for suspected bacterial infection of the lungs fell by 50% & large numbers of people died avoidable deaths (and rather horrible deaths, too).
It’s not possible to regard all of this evidence without concluding that malice aforethought was at work here. It’s literally diabolical, what they did.
How it was done with so little pushback still confuses me. I do know that from the late-1990s right through late-2019, there was a sequence of tabletop simulations of global pandemic scenarios & bioterrorism scenarios, which allowed the perpetrators to hone their craft in the responses & control measures imposed. I believe some of these were translated onto the ground, giving emergency response team a chance to form & to rehearse what most of them thought were appropriate, given the fictional set up, though this is speculative.
Then we come to the “vaccines”. Given a career in pharma and biotech, I knew that it was impossible to create a vaccine in under 5-6 years if they were going to demonstrate clinical safety and hone manufacturing to yield the customarily high quality manufacturing necessary to produce tightly defined final drug product. If the latter if not done, it’s pointless doing the former, because what would otherwise be injected wouldn’t be what had been used in the clinical trials.
In other words, if there was a need for a new vaccine, you would never even contemplate running such a program, because no pandemic in history lasts a fraction of the minimum time necessary to create a safe and effective new vaccine.
Yet they went ahead. This too is malevolent, let alone the extraordinary lying, censorship & smearing of dissenters.
Given my entire career used “rational drug design” principles to design and test molecules, I was able to put myself in the shoes of the designers of the jabs.
There are several, completely obvious safety issues built into these products.
One is the axiomatic induction of “autoimmune” responses, regardless of which antigen was selected.
The next was choice of antigen, where no one would pick spike protein, because it was highly likely to be directly toxic, it’s subject to the most rapid mutation (so a vaccine might lose efficacy) & also it’s the least different from human proteins (and so might trigger bystander attacks on even somewhat similar self proteins).
Yet all four leading players chose this antigen. What a coincidence! I’d have called up my peers in the other companies to endure we didn’t do that. That’s because it would be highly undesirable to have common risks to all programs.
On formulation, the mRNA-based products both selected LNPs to encapsulate their message. Yet there was industry knowledge that these not only travel all over the body including into the brain but that they accumulate in the ovaries.
Yet, knowing this, the companies & regulators went ahead and then others compounded the toxicity risk by recommending these injections in pregnant women and children.
I was still slow to piece together all this evidence of carefully thought out harms. But eventually I got there are have been speaking in what many regard as extreme terms ever since.
I’m afraid there’s no hiding from the reality that this is a global coup d’etat and intentional mass murder.
Worse, we see the encroachment of surveillance technology and legal powers to introduce digital ID & CBDC as well as to eliminate cash.
It’s not difficult to come up with scenarios where presentation of digital ID will become mandatory.
👍68❤25💯14🔥11🙏4
All that’s needed is for WHO to invent fake pandemics, for pharma to manufacture billions of doses of mRNA based fake vaccines and for governments to insist that digital IDs will remain valid only if you accede to these injurious jabs, and there’s a near perfect depopulation tool with plausible deniability.
They may do other things too, but I think they are going to try this.
We must keep speaking out and trying to wake people up.
It’s only takes a substantial minority to say NO & these diabolical plans fail.
With best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
They may do other things too, but I think they are going to try this.
We must keep speaking out and trying to wake people up.
It’s only takes a substantial minority to say NO & these diabolical plans fail.
With best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
❤123👍44💯35🙏9❤🔥6🔥6👏6
Forwarded from Andrija Klarić
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌞FREE podcast #34 Judith Curry: "AR 6 (assessment report) admitted that the estimates are exaggerated. Science has nothing to say whether warming is good for the planet or not. Political assessments are made, not scientific."
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipo A well-known American climatologist and author of the book "Climate Uncertainties and Risk" talks about the real scientific reasons for climate change. The whole interview can be explained with one sentence: "When you mix science and politics you get politics".
You can buy the book here
https://blackwells.co.uk/.../Climate.../9781839989254
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://bit.ly/YouTubeSLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipo A well-known American climatologist and author of the book "Climate Uncertainties and Risk" talks about the real scientific reasons for climate change. The whole interview can be explained with one sentence: "When you mix science and politics you get politics".
You can buy the book here
https://blackwells.co.uk/.../Climate.../9781839989254
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://bit.ly/YouTubeSLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/
👍27❤7🔥2
Dr Judith Curry’s climate science credentials are outstanding. Here, she summarises the most recent IPCC scientific working group reports.
An important retelling which the public never gets to hear, because it’s the executive summary that features on the news. The scientific working group summaries issue SIX MONTHS LATER.
Best wishes
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/30148
An important retelling which the public never gets to hear, because it’s the executive summary that features on the news. The scientific working group summaries issue SIX MONTHS LATER.
Best wishes
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/30148
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
🌞FREE podcast #34 Judith Curry: "AR 6 (assessment report) admitted that the estimates are exaggerated. Science has nothing to say whether warming is good for the planet or not. Political assessments are made, not scientific."
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ ht…
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ ht…
👍42❤8🔥4
TABLETOP EXERCISE
"Catastrophic Contagion"
"Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people."
Catastrophic Contagion
https://catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org/
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692844974461616578
"Catastrophic Contagion"
"Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people."
Catastrophic Contagion
https://catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org/
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1692844974461616578
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
Catastrophic Contagion | Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
🤯22👍15🤬11😱2
Forwarded from Oracle Films
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CATASTROPHIC CONTAGION:
On October 23, 2022, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion; a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium.
These are the same organisations that played out Event 201 almost three years ago to the day.
Catastrophic Contagion simulated a new Enterovirus originating near Brazil. The virus has a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affects children.
Lessons from the exercise: "Countries should prioritise efforts to increase trust in government and public health; improve public health communication efforts; increase the resiliency of populations to misleading information; and reduce the spread of harmful misinformation"
Source
On October 23, 2022, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion; a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium.
These are the same organisations that played out Event 201 almost three years ago to the day.
Catastrophic Contagion simulated a new Enterovirus originating near Brazil. The virus has a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affects children.
Lessons from the exercise: "Countries should prioritise efforts to increase trust in government and public health; improve public health communication efforts; increase the resiliency of populations to misleading information; and reduce the spread of harmful misinformation"
Source
🤬84🤯30👍8🥴6❤2🤔2
Urgent warning to parents as deadly baby virus on the rise in the UK and Europe | The US Sun
https://www.the-sun.com/health/8581129/enterovirus-rising-killer-baby-disease/
https://www.the-sun.com/health/8581129/enterovirus-rising-killer-baby-disease/
The US Sun
Urgent warning to parents as deadly baby virus on the rise in the UK and Europe
A VIRUS that can leave some babies completely paralysed is on the rise in the UK and Europe, experts warn. In most people, the bug, known as enterovirus-11 typically causes a mild cold-li…
🤬167🤔28👍8😁6🥴6🙏5❤4
Some of you may recall a population forecast by a group called Deagel for many countries that was online in 2020.
For U.K. it predicted a reduction in population of more than 70%, with falls in USA only a little behind at 68%.
The target date given was 2025.
So far, though all-causes mortality is hugely & unmistakably well above recently established trend lines, accompanied by unprecedented falls in live birth rates, extrapolating a further two years wouldn’t result in population reductions anything like as large as in the Deagel reports.
I infer that there’s a high likelihood of further assaults on the population.
I have read documents going back decades & the self appointed elites anticipated using a mixture of infectious diseases, poisonous vaccines, regional conflicts including civil & general wars, even starvation.
Please use your imagination. If you were trying to harm a population with plausible deniability, what would you do?
Some combination of these seems likely to occur. The perpetrators are not going away unless & until enough of us say no.
You do not have to comply with unjust laws. It is often said that “When government becomes tyrannical, resistance becomes a duty”.
I have read that those who would visit tremendous evil on others are required, by their own perverted code, to warn their victims beforehand.
Best wishes
Mike
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/03/deagel-2025-cia-rockefeller-c19-vaccine/
For U.K. it predicted a reduction in population of more than 70%, with falls in USA only a little behind at 68%.
The target date given was 2025.
So far, though all-causes mortality is hugely & unmistakably well above recently established trend lines, accompanied by unprecedented falls in live birth rates, extrapolating a further two years wouldn’t result in population reductions anything like as large as in the Deagel reports.
I infer that there’s a high likelihood of further assaults on the population.
I have read documents going back decades & the self appointed elites anticipated using a mixture of infectious diseases, poisonous vaccines, regional conflicts including civil & general wars, even starvation.
Please use your imagination. If you were trying to harm a population with plausible deniability, what would you do?
Some combination of these seems likely to occur. The perpetrators are not going away unless & until enough of us say no.
You do not have to comply with unjust laws. It is often said that “When government becomes tyrannical, resistance becomes a duty”.
I have read that those who would visit tremendous evil on others are required, by their own perverted code, to warn their victims beforehand.
Best wishes
Mike
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/03/deagel-2025-cia-rockefeller-c19-vaccine/
Expose-News
CIA, DoD & Rockefeller Foundation exposed as Masterminds behind Deagel.com’s eerie 2025 Depopulaton Forecast & COVID Vaccine Death…
In a world where reality often seems stranger than fiction, the machinations behind global events can be an enigma wrapped in mystery. One such intrigue revolves around Deagel.com, an obscure online entity known for its exhaustive data on military capabilities…
❤63🔥47👍44🙏5😱3💯3
Forwarded from Dr. Simon
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Novak Djokovic was excluded from the US Open for the last two years because he refused to participate in a human experiment.
Today, he won the US Open for the fourth time – his 24th Grand Slam victory overall.
The fact that Moderna was the main sponsor of this event makes his win even more triumphant.
Congratulations, Novak. You’re the GOAT and an idol for billions of people on this planet who also haven’t bowed to the medical-industrial complex.
@Goddek
Today, he won the US Open for the fourth time – his 24th Grand Slam victory overall.
The fact that Moderna was the main sponsor of this event makes his win even more triumphant.
Congratulations, Novak. You’re the GOAT and an idol for billions of people on this planet who also haven’t bowed to the medical-industrial complex.
@Goddek
❤446👏101💯33👍17🏆12👌4⚡2
In The Image Of NOAA
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (abbreviated as NOAA /ˈnoʊ.ə/ NOH-ə) is a Washington, D.C.–based scientific and regulatory agency within the United States Department of Commerce, a United States federal government department.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hs-K_tadveI&feature=shared
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (abbreviated as NOAA /ˈnoʊ.ə/ NOH-ə) is a Washington, D.C.–based scientific and regulatory agency within the United States Department of Commerce, a United States federal government department.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hs-K_tadveI&feature=shared
🤬34👍8❤3💯2😱1
Forwarded from Coronavirus Plushie
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Principles Over Compliance
5 Feb 2022:
"The principles of decision making on my body are more important than any title or anything else."
11 Sep 2023:
Novak Djokovic Equals Grand Slam record after US Open triumph over Daniil Medvedev.
This video:
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1701070343593775285
5 Feb 2022:
"The principles of decision making on my body are more important than any title or anything else."
11 Sep 2023:
Novak Djokovic Equals Grand Slam record after US Open triumph over Daniil Medvedev.
This video:
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1701070343593775285
❤184👏49🔥12👍8🏆7
Forwarded from Coronavirus Plushie
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SEVEN
The Best Film About WTC 7
Directed by Dylan Avery and narrated by beloved actor Ed Asner, tells the story of World Trade Center Building 7 - from its jaw dropping "collapse" on 9/11 to the government’s blatant cover-up to the intrepid study by Dr. Leroy Hulsey and his Ph.D. students at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
This video:
Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N6gTexNhcWLe/
Twitter
https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1700956466377887896
The Best Film About WTC 7
Directed by Dylan Avery and narrated by beloved actor Ed Asner, tells the story of World Trade Center Building 7 - from its jaw dropping "collapse" on 9/11 to the government’s blatant cover-up to the intrepid study by Dr. Leroy Hulsey and his Ph.D. students at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
This video:
Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N6gTexNhcWLe/
https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1700956466377887896
👍62❤23🔥14😁1
"The title “River of Freedom” is no surprise given Michael Wood (Hipkin’s fellow minister in the Ardern Administration at the time) had labelled the protestors “Ferals in a River of Filth”.
@River_Of_Freedom
River of Freedom
https://wp.me/p56l30-2uh
@River_Of_Freedom
River of Freedom
https://wp.me/p56l30-2uh
Writer of Sorts
River of Freedom
New Zealand Prime minister Chris Hipkins was set up for the fail last Sunday when he was asked about New Zealand’s pandemic mandates. A previous post “Hipkins Hat Trick” looks at …
❤47🔥13👍7
Forwarded from Andrija Klarić
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🐶Neil Oliver: "From the beginning I noticed the bias of the media I grew up with. They didn't open up the questions I wanted to hear the answer to. That's when GB NEWS was born and I got the chance to ask them myself".
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipoI archeologist and GB NEWS journalist is one of the loudest in asking uncomfortable questions about topics pushed by the mainstream in Great Britain and thus in the whole western world. He believes that they are trying to impose neo-feudalism on us. If we do not actively oppose it, they will surely succeed.
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://bit.ly/YouTubeSLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipoI archeologist and GB NEWS journalist is one of the loudest in asking uncomfortable questions about topics pushed by the mainstream in Great Britain and thus in the whole western world. He believes that they are trying to impose neo-feudalism on us. If we do not actively oppose it, they will surely succeed.
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://bit.ly/YouTubeSLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/
👍64❤13🔥7