⚠️Bioweapons Alert⚠️

Journalist gets too close to the big secret!

State Dept spokesman Matt Miller panics and refuses to comment on USAID funding of gain of function on Coronaviruses!

USAID is the CIA proxy that funds bioweapons research in Ukraine as well.

MUST WATCH!

I believe what Andrew Bridgen is saying. The material injected into hundreds of millions of people is not the material used in the already exposed as sketchy clinical trials.
I know this because it’s impossible to manufacture billions of doses using the methods used to create the batches used in small scale regulatory route studies.
To scale up requires synthetic route development work of a very substantial nature, is likely to require new purification steps, tests & acceptable results, and this takes years, not months.
In any case, being a complex biological and not a defined substance, the resulting product would inevitably be similar to but not identical with the R&D version. This, bridging studies would be unavoidably required, further adding time to commercial launch.
Whatever people who accepted these jabs have had injected into them, I couldn’t guess. It’s not what the said.
Best way
Mike
Ps: the most experienced person speaking out is Hedley Rees, see his output on Substack and please share the word including Andrews warning & Hedley’s compelling arguments.

https://t.me/robinmg/30190

https://x.com/rayarmat/status/1701367209715462223?s=52&t=WSMLCQNckomGtNidcKiTmw

A remarkable story, if confirmed.
If confirmed, it’s if the utmost importance that this be widely shared.

I’d be surprised if it was completely true, but here’s hoping!

Best wishes
Mike

https://x.com/nzdsos/status/1701332670566019110?s=52&t=WSMLCQNckomGtNidcKiTmw

This story I’m convinced is true. I saw the untypical act of a person giving a press conference and naturally looking extremely uncomfortable and agitated.
I thank him for crossing the Rubicon.

Best wishes
Mike

Looks like substantially more discernment in healthcare professionals than almost anywhere else.
We just need then to inform us of th3 basis of their decision.
Best wishes
Mike

Anyone in the southwest (Exeter) fancy politely joining this meeting and communicating why there certainly are conspiracies. Nothing theoretical about it.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.agile-rabbit.com/event/conspiracy-theories/

Gurner Group founder Tim Gurner tells the Financial Review Property Summit in Australia that workers have become "arrogant" since COVID and "We've got to kill that attitude."

"The current unemployment rate needs to rise by 40 per cent to 50 per cent to boost the Australian economy’s productivity."

"In my view, we need to see pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around."

"When there’s been a systematic change where employees feel the employer is extremely lucky to have them as opposed to the other way around it’s a dynamic that has to change. We’ve got to kill that attitude. And that has to come from hurting the economy"

OpenMindsInc.: And who was it that made the decision to make people stay home and get paid for it via coercion? Was it the same people that are now wanting unemployment to rise and that are deindustrializing entire nations?

You muppet.

Financial Review - Aired 12-09-2023

The Harm Caused by Masks

A new study suggests that the excess carbon dioxide breathed in by mask-wearers can have major health consequences.

"While eight times the normal level of carbon dioxide is toxic, research suggests that mask-wearers (specifically those who wear masks for more than 5 minutes at a time) are breathing in 35 to 80 times normal levels.

Mask-wearers breathe in greater amounts of air that should have been expelled from their bodies and released out into the open. “[A] significant rise in carbon dioxide occurring while wearing a mask is scientifically proven in many studies,” write the German authors. “Fresh air has around 0.04% CO2,” they observe, while chronic exposure at CO2 levels of 0.3 percent is “toxic.” How much CO2 do mask-wearers breathe in? The authors write that “masks bear a possible chronic exposure to low level carbon dioxide of 1.41–3.2% CO2 of the inhaled air in reliable human experiments.

What can breathing too much carbon dioxide do to you? The authors write that “at levels between 0.05% and 0.5% CO2,” one might experience an “increased heart rate, increased blood pressure and overall increased circulation with the symptoms of headache, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, dizziness, rhinitis, and dry cough.” Rates above 0.5 percent can lead to “reduced cognitive performance, impaired decision-making and reduced speed of cognitive solutions.” Beyond 1 percent, “the harmful effects include respiratory acidosis, metabolic stress, increased blood flow and decreased exercise tolerance.” Again, mask-wearers are likely breathing in CO2 levels between 1.4 percent and 3.2 percent—well above any of these thresholds. What’s more, “Testes metabolism and cell respiration have been shown to be inhibited increasingly by rising levels of CO2.
So, high blood pressure, reduced thinking ability, respiratory problems, and reproductive concerns are among the many possible results of effectively poisoning oneself by breathing in too much carbon dioxide.

The authors write that “it is clear that carbon dioxide rebreathing, especially when using N95 masks, is above the 0.8% CO2 limit set by the US Navy to reduce the risk of stillbirths and birth defects on submarines with female personnel who may be pregnant.” In other words, mandates have forced pregnant women to wear masks resulting in levels of CO2 inhalation that would be prohibited if they were serving on a Navy submarine.

Indeed, according to the authors, there exists “circumstantial evidence that popular mask use may be related to current observations of a significant rise of 28% to 33% in stillbirths worldwide and a reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance of two full standard deviations in scores in children born during the pandemic.”

They cite recent data from Australia, which “shows that lockdown restrictions and other measures (including masks that have been mandatory in Australia), in the absence of high rates of COVID-19 disease, were associated with a significant increase in stillborn births.” Meantime, “no increased risk of stillbirths was observed in Sweden,” which famously defied the public-health cabal and went its own way in setting Covid policies."

https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-harm-caused-by-masks

🇪🇺 Russians can't even bring shampoo: EU rules confirmed

The European Commission has confirmed that entry into EU countries with Russian-registered cars is prohibited.

It has been reported that personal belongings brought across the border by Russians, such as smartphones, jewelry, laptops, and cosmetics, are also at risk of being detained at customs.

Earlier this summer, some Russian tourists traveling to Germany in their cars faced car arrests upon arrival. So now the pan-European regulator has consequently upheld these actions.

In response to the inquiry, "Can Russian citizens temporarily bring personal belongings and vehicles, such as cell phones, laptop computers, jewelry, cosmetics, etc. to the European Union, for example for tourist purposes?" the European Commission's answer was a resounding, "No."

Thus, Russian visitors should now be aware that even the most innocuous items, such as toilet paper, shampoos, and toothpaste can also be held at customs.

The Russian tourist can't have a car, a computer or a phone. They'll want tourists to come naked soon.

Follow us on Telegram and Twitter