Open letter to Locala's school-aged immunisation team
"5. What controls have been put in place to mitigate the possibility of the live flu nasal spray prompting antibody dependent enhancement - ADE - in children who may have developed this syndrome from the COVID-19 vaccines that many school-aged children have received?
In relation to point five, evidence shows clearly that COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of inducing ADE in recipients, and many top experts and vaccine developers have warned of this since 2020. As you know, ADE represents a serious abnormality in immune system function, and renders those who develop this syndrome at risk of a catastrophic overreaction to live viruses, such as the types contained in the flu nasal spray.
It is already official advice not to give the flu nasal spray to the immunocompromised for precisely this reason. Plausibly, some Covid-vaccinated children have become immunocompromised (have developed ADE) from this vaccine, and so should not be receiving any live virus vaccines.
Yet it appears that no controls have been put in place to identify these children, nor does any evidence exist showing that the flu nasal spray is safe for Covid-vaccinated children.
This is not to suggest the evidence suggests the spray is "safe" for non-Covid-vaccinated children, as there are a litany of side effects, some of them severe, that have been associated with this spray for many years, long before the advent of the Covid vaccines.
Rather, it is to suggest the flu spray may be far more dangerous for Covid-vaccinated children than their unvaccinated counterparts, and to ask you what evidence you have to demonstrate otherwise. It is also to remind you of your legal obligation under the Montgomery ruling to inform parents and children of all material risks of a vaccine "to which a reasonable person in the patient's position would attach significance".
Any reasonable person would attach a great deal of significance to the risk of ADE, which could be triggered by a live virus vaccine, so it is incumbent on you to fully inform all families of this, and all other, risks when offering the live flu nasal spray to their children.
This is an issue of extreme local and national importance and we seek your prompt and urgent reply, and comprehensive answers to the five listed questions, before you begin administering this spray in schools.
Please note this is an open letter that has been shared on our resource and sent to all our subscribers.
Yours faithfully,
Miriam Finch
Mark Finch
Founders
Informed Consent Matters"
https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/open-letter-to-locala-s-school-aged-immunisation-team
"5. What controls have been put in place to mitigate the possibility of the live flu nasal spray prompting antibody dependent enhancement - ADE - in children who may have developed this syndrome from the COVID-19 vaccines that many school-aged children have received?
In relation to point five, evidence shows clearly that COVID-19 vaccines carry the risk of inducing ADE in recipients, and many top experts and vaccine developers have warned of this since 2020. As you know, ADE represents a serious abnormality in immune system function, and renders those who develop this syndrome at risk of a catastrophic overreaction to live viruses, such as the types contained in the flu nasal spray.
It is already official advice not to give the flu nasal spray to the immunocompromised for precisely this reason. Plausibly, some Covid-vaccinated children have become immunocompromised (have developed ADE) from this vaccine, and so should not be receiving any live virus vaccines.
Yet it appears that no controls have been put in place to identify these children, nor does any evidence exist showing that the flu nasal spray is safe for Covid-vaccinated children.
This is not to suggest the evidence suggests the spray is "safe" for non-Covid-vaccinated children, as there are a litany of side effects, some of them severe, that have been associated with this spray for many years, long before the advent of the Covid vaccines.
Rather, it is to suggest the flu spray may be far more dangerous for Covid-vaccinated children than their unvaccinated counterparts, and to ask you what evidence you have to demonstrate otherwise. It is also to remind you of your legal obligation under the Montgomery ruling to inform parents and children of all material risks of a vaccine "to which a reasonable person in the patient's position would attach significance".
Any reasonable person would attach a great deal of significance to the risk of ADE, which could be triggered by a live virus vaccine, so it is incumbent on you to fully inform all families of this, and all other, risks when offering the live flu nasal spray to their children.
This is an issue of extreme local and national importance and we seek your prompt and urgent reply, and comprehensive answers to the five listed questions, before you begin administering this spray in schools.
Please note this is an open letter that has been shared on our resource and sent to all our subscribers.
Yours faithfully,
Miriam Finch
Mark Finch
Founders
Informed Consent Matters"
https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/open-letter-to-locala-s-school-aged-immunisation-team
👍74❤16🤯1
Forwarded from World Council for Health
Do Masks Have Side Effects? Are They Even Effective?
In the coming months, it seems likely that government health authorities will attempt to require mask-wearing in public and for travel again, don't fall for it!
Use the WCH resources below. ⬇️
7 Reasons to End Mask Mandates Forever
http://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/end-mask-mandates
Are Masks Effective? What the Science Says
http://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/are-masks-effective-for-covid-19-what-the-science-says
Risk vs Benefit for Kids
http://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/face-masks-the-risks-vs-benefits-for-children
Are masks really safe? Do they prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Do you need to wear one for the benefit of others?
These resources address common questions, give guidance and encouragement to those wishing to advocate for themselves and their dependents, and outline several reasons to end mask mandates for good.
The harms are real.
Please do share with your network. 🙏
Follow:➡️ @WCH_org
📧 NEWSLETTER | 🌳 LINKTREE
🌐 WorldCouncilforHealth.org
In the coming months, it seems likely that government health authorities will attempt to require mask-wearing in public and for travel again, don't fall for it!
Use the WCH resources below. ⬇️
7 Reasons to End Mask Mandates Forever
http://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/end-mask-mandates
Are Masks Effective? What the Science Says
http://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/are-masks-effective-for-covid-19-what-the-science-says
Risk vs Benefit for Kids
http://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/face-masks-the-risks-vs-benefits-for-children
Are masks really safe? Do they prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Do you need to wear one for the benefit of others?
These resources address common questions, give guidance and encouragement to those wishing to advocate for themselves and their dependents, and outline several reasons to end mask mandates for good.
The harms are real.
Please do share with your network. 🙏
Follow:
📧 NEWSLETTER | 🌳 LINKTREE
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥35👍15👏7❤5
Forwarded from UK Column
The UK is now the vanguard of crony capitalism
The UK’s “left” is taking some strange positions at the moment. Stop the War is prioritising Net Zero and "climate crisis" at a time when we’re possibly the closest we’ve ever been to nuclear annihilation.
www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-uk-is-now-the-vanguard-of-crony-capitalism
The UK’s “left” is taking some strange positions at the moment. Stop the War is prioritising Net Zero and "climate crisis" at a time when we’re possibly the closest we’ve ever been to nuclear annihilation.
www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-uk-is-now-the-vanguard-of-crony-capitalism
👍37🤬23🔥7
GOOD NEWS, THE CLIMATE IS OPTIMAL:
"We are in a climate optimum, not a climate emergency"
"There were several times when we saw this kind of warming in the past, and life thrived on the planet. I suspect the reason that past warming occurred is likely because the ocean warmed. And the oceans warmed, I think, because of increasing underwater volcanic activity."
He said a perfect example of his theory is the 2022 eruption of the underwater volcano Hunga Tonga, which sent the equivalent of 58,000 swimming pools worth of water vapor into the stratosphere and accounts for warmer-than-average weather in some areas during 2023.
"Increases in the geothermal activity precede the increase in sea surface temperatures," he said. "Water vapor is the number one greenhouse gas. So if the oceans warm, you put more water vapor into the air. Consequently, you get the warming, and most of the warming is occurring away from the equator. And that's another clue because it's occurring where it's coldest and driest, and that's where water vapor has the greatest influence on temperature.
He said if the temperature rises due to geothermal activity, the increase is not man-made, and the push for net-zero CO2 by 2050 is pointless.
"My judgment is that these people are pushing [a climate emergency] for a completely different reason than climate and weather," he said.
"What [climate alarmists] do is they're sort of predators in that they realize the average person doesn't have time to think and examine every little detail, especially in this day and age where people live paycheck to paycheck and are worried about their jobs."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/meteorologists-scientists-explain-why-there-is-no-climate-emergency-5489139
"We are in a climate optimum, not a climate emergency"
"There were several times when we saw this kind of warming in the past, and life thrived on the planet. I suspect the reason that past warming occurred is likely because the ocean warmed. And the oceans warmed, I think, because of increasing underwater volcanic activity."
He said a perfect example of his theory is the 2022 eruption of the underwater volcano Hunga Tonga, which sent the equivalent of 58,000 swimming pools worth of water vapor into the stratosphere and accounts for warmer-than-average weather in some areas during 2023.
"Increases in the geothermal activity precede the increase in sea surface temperatures," he said. "Water vapor is the number one greenhouse gas. So if the oceans warm, you put more water vapor into the air. Consequently, you get the warming, and most of the warming is occurring away from the equator. And that's another clue because it's occurring where it's coldest and driest, and that's where water vapor has the greatest influence on temperature.
He said if the temperature rises due to geothermal activity, the increase is not man-made, and the push for net-zero CO2 by 2050 is pointless.
"My judgment is that these people are pushing [a climate emergency] for a completely different reason than climate and weather," he said.
"What [climate alarmists] do is they're sort of predators in that they realize the average person doesn't have time to think and examine every little detail, especially in this day and age where people live paycheck to paycheck and are worried about their jobs."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/meteorologists-scientists-explain-why-there-is-no-climate-emergency-5489139
The Epoch Times
Meteorologists, Scientists Explain Why There Is ‘No Climate Emergency’
More than 1,600 scientists and informed professionals signed the Global Climate Intelligence Group’s “World Climate Declaration.”
👍76🔥23❤7
Useful example to prompt us to check with all our senses whether what we’ve been told is realistic, credible, accurate or not.
Best wishes
Mike
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hm1u6qZyQ4w
Best wishes
Mike
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hm1u6qZyQ4w
YouTube
This is an Orange
WTC7 - This is an Orange
A comparison between what we are told and what we can see, with our own eyes. World Trade Center 7 collapsed after having been damaged by fire and falling debris, but the collapse looks very much like a controlled demolition.
A comparison between what we are told and what we can see, with our own eyes. World Trade Center 7 collapsed after having been damaged by fire and falling debris, but the collapse looks very much like a controlled demolition.
👍113🔥43❤14👏6
Forwarded from Graham Whatley
I’m quoting myself as I posted this elswhere in answer to the claim that WTC 7 collapsed from fire:
“No high-rise steel-framed building has ever suffered a global collapse from fire before or since 9/11 yet it happened 3 times on that day. WTC 7 suffered limited damage to one facade due to debris from the north tower and had contained, short lived office fires on 10 to 22 floors. The official NIST report of the collapse is absolutely ludicrous. They removed all of the girder stiffeners and significantly reduced the size of the bearing seats in their model, which invalidates it at a stroke. They claim a single-column failure on floor 13 caused the complete collapse of the entire building, at near freefall, into its own footprint - meaning the structure below was offering no resistance at all to the floors above. This is absurd, steel framed skyscrapers are built to at least 3x redundancy, and given the height of building 7, 4x redundancy. You could literally remove all of the columns on one side of the building and half of the columns on the other side and it would still stand. The only way building 7 could have collapsed as seen, was a complete simultaneous core column failure, followed a second later by a complete simultaneous exterior column failure. Unfortunately NIST’s attempt to cover up 9/11 has completely infested the engineering profession with fake science, and skyscrapers are now being built to combat a non existant risk of collapse from fire.”
“No high-rise steel-framed building has ever suffered a global collapse from fire before or since 9/11 yet it happened 3 times on that day. WTC 7 suffered limited damage to one facade due to debris from the north tower and had contained, short lived office fires on 10 to 22 floors. The official NIST report of the collapse is absolutely ludicrous. They removed all of the girder stiffeners and significantly reduced the size of the bearing seats in their model, which invalidates it at a stroke. They claim a single-column failure on floor 13 caused the complete collapse of the entire building, at near freefall, into its own footprint - meaning the structure below was offering no resistance at all to the floors above. This is absurd, steel framed skyscrapers are built to at least 3x redundancy, and given the height of building 7, 4x redundancy. You could literally remove all of the columns on one side of the building and half of the columns on the other side and it would still stand. The only way building 7 could have collapsed as seen, was a complete simultaneous core column failure, followed a second later by a complete simultaneous exterior column failure. Unfortunately NIST’s attempt to cover up 9/11 has completely infested the engineering profession with fake science, and skyscrapers are now being built to combat a non existant risk of collapse from fire.”
👍72💯41🔥12❤5
Forwarded from COVID-19 Up (Mitchell)
Belgium Assessing Apple iPhone 12 After France Halts Sales over Radiation
Belgium said on Thursday it would review potential health risks linked to Apple's iPhone 12, raising the prospect that more European countries might ban the model after France ordered a halt to sales due to breaches of radiation exposure limits.
However, there seemed to be no immediate prospect of an EU-wide ban as the European Commission said it would wait for feedback from other EU countries before deciding on any action.
European Union member states, which were notified by the French regulator on Wednesday, have three months to provide comments. Some, such as Italy, said they would take no steps for now.
Apple contests the French findings, saying the iPhone 12 - now a relatively old model launched in 2020 - was certified by multiple international bodies as compliant with radiation standards.
Researchers have conducted a vast number of studies over the last two decades to assess the health risk of mobile phones. According to the World Health Organisation, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by their use.
...Mathieu Michel, Belgium's state secretary for digitalisation told Reuters that the Belgian regulator was looking into the matter after the French moves.
"We immediately asked the IBPT (Belgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications) for confirmation, or at least an analysis, and this is currently under way," he said.
Michel also asked the regulator to review all Apple smartphones, and devices made by others, at a later stage.
...MONITORING
The Dutch digital watchdog also said it was looking into the matter and would ask the U.S. firm for an explanation, while stressing there was "no acute safety risk".
Italy's industry ministry, meanwhile, said it was monitoring the situation but not taking any action for now.
Portugal's telecommunications regulator ANACOM said it was monitoring and analysing developments in coordination with France, and expected one of the two likely outcomes: Apple correcting the situation or, failing that, Brussels telling EU member states "to adopt proportional measures".
Britain, where the iPhone 12 met radiation safety standards when it was released, has not announced any plans in the wake of France's decision.
Industry experts said there were no safety risks as regulatory limits, based on the risk of burns or heatstroke from the phone's radiation[Safe and effective radiation]
SOURCE: Reuters
9/12/23 — France Halts Apple iPhone 12 Sales for Above-Threshold Radiation Levels
Belgium said on Thursday it would review potential health risks linked to Apple's iPhone 12, raising the prospect that more European countries might ban the model after France ordered a halt to sales due to breaches of radiation exposure limits.
However, there seemed to be no immediate prospect of an EU-wide ban as the European Commission said it would wait for feedback from other EU countries before deciding on any action.
European Union member states, which were notified by the French regulator on Wednesday, have three months to provide comments. Some, such as Italy, said they would take no steps for now.
Apple contests the French findings, saying the iPhone 12 - now a relatively old model launched in 2020 - was certified by multiple international bodies as compliant with radiation standards.
Researchers have conducted a vast number of studies over the last two decades to assess the health risk of mobile phones. According to the World Health Organisation, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by their use.
...Mathieu Michel, Belgium's state secretary for digitalisation told Reuters that the Belgian regulator was looking into the matter after the French moves.
"We immediately asked the IBPT (Belgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications) for confirmation, or at least an analysis, and this is currently under way," he said.
Michel also asked the regulator to review all Apple smartphones, and devices made by others, at a later stage.
...MONITORING
The Dutch digital watchdog also said it was looking into the matter and would ask the U.S. firm for an explanation, while stressing there was "no acute safety risk".
Italy's industry ministry, meanwhile, said it was monitoring the situation but not taking any action for now.
Portugal's telecommunications regulator ANACOM said it was monitoring and analysing developments in coordination with France, and expected one of the two likely outcomes: Apple correcting the situation or, failing that, Brussels telling EU member states "to adopt proportional measures".
Britain, where the iPhone 12 met radiation safety standards when it was released, has not announced any plans in the wake of France's decision.
Industry experts said there were no safety risks as regulatory limits, based on the risk of burns or heatstroke from the phone's radiation[Safe and effective radiation]
SOURCE: Reuters
9/12/23 — France Halts Apple iPhone 12 Sales for Above-Threshold Radiation Levels
Telegram
COVID-19 Up
Dr. Beverly Rubik on The Effects of Exposure to Wireless Radiation
There are thousands of papers on the non thermal effects of wireless exposure.
This is below the thermal limit which is close to the the allowed exposures on earth. Every country is different.…
There are thousands of papers on the non thermal effects of wireless exposure.
This is below the thermal limit which is close to the the allowed exposures on earth. Every country is different.…
👍41❤16🔥1🤔1
Unvaccinated pupils face 21-day isolation as measles cases rise
"Unvaccinated children face being forced to self-isolate for 21 days because of a rapid rise in measles cases.
Councils issued warnings to parents after modelling suggested that up to 160,000 cases could occur in London alone. Health officials say low uptake of MMR jabs has increased the risk of the potentially deadly infection.
In letters from local authorities, parents in London and its surrounding counties were told that if a pupil is infected, classmates who have not had both doses of MMR could be sent home and asked to self-isolate for three weeks."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/14/unvaccinated-children-self-isolation-measles-cases-rise/
"Unvaccinated children face being forced to self-isolate for 21 days because of a rapid rise in measles cases.
Councils issued warnings to parents after modelling suggested that up to 160,000 cases could occur in London alone. Health officials say low uptake of MMR jabs has increased the risk of the potentially deadly infection.
In letters from local authorities, parents in London and its surrounding counties were told that if a pupil is infected, classmates who have not had both doses of MMR could be sent home and asked to self-isolate for three weeks."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/14/unvaccinated-children-self-isolation-measles-cases-rise/
The Telegraph
Measles cases reach three-year high in England
141 confirmed cases recorded between January and July 2023, with more than half of infections detected in London, say UK health officials
🤬87😁13👍12❤8👌2
Measles:
Informed consent for the MMR vaccine means knowing ALL the facts, and especially whether the risks of the vaccine are higher than the risks of the treated (vitamin A) disease:
picdata.org/measles
Informed consent for the MMR vaccine means knowing ALL the facts, and especially whether the risks of the vaccine are higher than the risks of the treated (vitamin A) disease:
picdata.org/measles
Physicians for Informed Consent
Measles – Disease Information Statement (DIS)
Vaccine Ingredients: Aluminum. The purpose of aluminum adjuvants, potential health effects, and expert insights.
❤50👍14🔥1
Severe measles is easily treated with high doses of vitamin A.
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Vitamin A in Children with Severe Measles | NEJM
"Treatment with vitamin A reduces morbidity and mortality in measles, and all children with severe measles should be given vitamin A supplements, whether or not they are thought to have a nutritional deficiency. (N Engl J Med 1990; 323:160–4.)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199007193230304
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Vitamin A in Children with Severe Measles | NEJM
"Treatment with vitamin A reduces morbidity and mortality in measles, and all children with severe measles should be given vitamin A supplements, whether or not they are thought to have a nutritional deficiency. (N Engl J Med 1990; 323:160–4.)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199007193230304
NEJM
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Vitamin A in Children with Severe Measles
Measles kills about 2 million children annually, and there is no specific therapy for the disease. It has been suggested that vitamin A may be of benefit in the treatment of measles. We conducted a...
❤60👍35
The segregation of unvaccinated children is a compliance test. We need to push back on all fronts whether our kids are MMR vaccinated or not.
United non compliance means standing up for every kid, not only ours when it's convenient only to us
If they get away with segregating non MMR vaccinated kids, next it will be Covid19 mRNA unvaccinated kids.
United non compliance means standing up for every kid, not only ours when it's convenient only to us
If they get away with segregating non MMR vaccinated kids, next it will be Covid19 mRNA unvaccinated kids.
🔥91👍58💯36❤18
No person can subject another who refuses any medical procedure (i.e. vaccine) to any disadvantage or prejudice (i.e. isolation) without violating their inalienable human rights. Anybody promoting this is also participating in systematic planning of mass human rights violations.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1702568621594017956
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1702568621594017956
👍100🔥17🤬14❤9
You won’t need reminding not to follow government advice on these intentionally harmful by design injections (whatever the hell is in the vials), but perhaps you might save someone on the verge of waking up to the awfulness by sharing this.
Under no circumstances can mRNA based injections, masquerading as “vaccines”, be safe as a mass market product.
I’ve previously said I could think of only two, potentially sensible uses for this technology. One was to induce death in cancer cells and the other, to replace a missing or defective protein.
On the latter, an error in my logic was pointed out to me. They reminded me that such a person developed in that disease state, such that the normal product of the normal gene was never present. How then would our immune systems know that this belongs? There will be T-cells capable of responding to the normal protein in a person who lacks the normal protein. So even that utility isn’t available.
To the best of my recollection, when I was in Pfizer, the “immunooncology” application was the only one being pursued as a lab project.
Why is it being used in a supposed public health intervention? It can only do harm.
Best wishes
Mike
https://truth613.substack.com/p/insane-cdc-says-will-you-be-my-lab
Under no circumstances can mRNA based injections, masquerading as “vaccines”, be safe as a mass market product.
I’ve previously said I could think of only two, potentially sensible uses for this technology. One was to induce death in cancer cells and the other, to replace a missing or defective protein.
On the latter, an error in my logic was pointed out to me. They reminded me that such a person developed in that disease state, such that the normal product of the normal gene was never present. How then would our immune systems know that this belongs? There will be T-cells capable of responding to the normal protein in a person who lacks the normal protein. So even that utility isn’t available.
To the best of my recollection, when I was in Pfizer, the “immunooncology” application was the only one being pursued as a lab project.
Why is it being used in a supposed public health intervention? It can only do harm.
Best wishes
Mike
https://truth613.substack.com/p/insane-cdc-says-will-you-be-my-lab
In G-d’s Army There’s Only Truth
Insane: CDC Says “Will You Be My Lab Rat?”
As they recommend new, no-human-tests “vaccine” for every man, woman, and child in America, starting from 6 months old. “Science” is dead.
👍55❤12🔥6👏6
From conspiracy theory to public policy in a jiffy.
Links at the base of this short piece, which is dated September 2023.
Note that even if the narrative hadn’t been total lies, the alleged vaccines are confirmed not to prevent transmission. It’s therefore completely irrelevant from a public health perspective whether or not you’ve been injected. Yet based on ignoring that inconvenient truth, the globalists propose you won’t be able to travel or enter a regulated space without being able to show that you’ve been poisoned. I think this is exactly what I’d expected to happen. I wish I hadn’t, but we’re way past the point that, unless your level of trust is up there with belief in the tooth fairy, you’ve got to be able to see how dark & evil this is.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: Apologies, the plan for “vaccine passports” is from 2021.
I understood that the issue of the newspaper is recent.
Either way, does it look more accurate or less accurate than in 2021? It’s more, isn’t it?
Links at the base of this short piece, which is dated September 2023.
Note that even if the narrative hadn’t been total lies, the alleged vaccines are confirmed not to prevent transmission. It’s therefore completely irrelevant from a public health perspective whether or not you’ve been injected. Yet based on ignoring that inconvenient truth, the globalists propose you won’t be able to travel or enter a regulated space without being able to show that you’ve been poisoned. I think this is exactly what I’d expected to happen. I wish I hadn’t, but we’re way past the point that, unless your level of trust is up there with belief in the tooth fairy, you’ve got to be able to see how dark & evil this is.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: Apologies, the plan for “vaccine passports” is from 2021.
I understood that the issue of the newspaper is recent.
Either way, does it look more accurate or less accurate than in 2021? It’s more, isn’t it?
👍86💯18❤15🔥9🥴4
A four minute summary of why you should not accept any mRNA based treatments.
From Dr Craig Wax. This short segment is an object lesson in hard hitting brevity.
Best wishes
Mike
https://rumble.com/v3he9sm-lack-of-efficacy-potential-harms-and-faulty-platform-of-the-mrna-lnp-and-dn.html
From Dr Craig Wax. This short segment is an object lesson in hard hitting brevity.
Best wishes
Mike
https://rumble.com/v3he9sm-lack-of-efficacy-potential-harms-and-faulty-platform-of-the-mrna-lnp-and-dn.html
Rumble
Lack of efficacy, potential harms, and faulty platform of the #mRNA #LNP & #DNA #COVID shots
Craig M. Wax, DO on the Bill Spadea show, September 13, 2023. Chasing extinct strains with inflammatory dangerous products. Pfizer XBB.1.5 Vaccine Tested in 20 Mice, No Control Group & No Humans #Cour
👍49🔥9❤5🤬1
Naomi Wolf writes well. She makes some very powerful points in this piece.
My aim in sharing it isn’t to do with politics of Empire, but this: look how often the “elites” in a given era & geography have used starvation as an ultimate weapon of control and depopulation.
Consider how easy it would be to replicate such a policy today.
I do not enjoy the fear this evokes & it’s not my intention to frighten, but to wake as many people up to the danger we’re all in. We need a non-violent revolution, before the inevitable occurs.
Best wishes
Mike
“This is one reason why those who seek to intimidate others with hurtling the pejorative “conspiracy theorist” at them, are really trying to keep people from acquiring the habit of assessing new dangers in their environment for themselves, or from learning from others with historical knowledge of, or with experience of, dangerous situations, instead of relying on the assurances of elites and gatekeepers. Elites and gatekeepers require the ignorance and credulity of “ordinary people” in order to get their dirty deeds — if they are set on harming or exploiting populations — done, without facing mass resistance.
History repeats, yes; but it repeats always in a new guise.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/naomiwolf/p/genocidal-ancestral-memory
My aim in sharing it isn’t to do with politics of Empire, but this: look how often the “elites” in a given era & geography have used starvation as an ultimate weapon of control and depopulation.
Consider how easy it would be to replicate such a policy today.
I do not enjoy the fear this evokes & it’s not my intention to frighten, but to wake as many people up to the danger we’re all in. We need a non-violent revolution, before the inevitable occurs.
Best wishes
Mike
“This is one reason why those who seek to intimidate others with hurtling the pejorative “conspiracy theorist” at them, are really trying to keep people from acquiring the habit of assessing new dangers in their environment for themselves, or from learning from others with historical knowledge of, or with experience of, dangerous situations, instead of relying on the assurances of elites and gatekeepers. Elites and gatekeepers require the ignorance and credulity of “ordinary people” in order to get their dirty deeds — if they are set on harming or exploiting populations — done, without facing mass resistance.
History repeats, yes; but it repeats always in a new guise.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/naomiwolf/p/genocidal-ancestral-memory
Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf
Genocidal Ancestral Memory
Did Leaders with "Genocidal Memory" in their Ancestors' Past, Help to Save Us?
👍57❤11🔥5👏2🥴2