I’m reading a draft of an open letter & came across a statement I’d seen before but hadn’t kept a copy of.
Arguments rage about whether the gene-based preparations are vaccines or something else.
Companies do not lie to the US Stock Exchange Commission (SEC). They know that, if they lie or deliberately mislead, investors & regulators will descend upon then like a ton of bricks. They pay close attention to such statements because it’s all about the money. They don’t care about your safety or mine.
It’s therefore instructive to note that BioNTech themselves classifies it’s mRNA based injections as gene therapies.
Best wishes
Mike

Firstly, mRNA products of the type referred to as vaccines are nothing of the sort. As recognised by BioNTech in their official SEC filing (bottom of p.14), the FDA regards these mRNA products as gene therapies. Changing the definition of what a vaccine is to include these mRNA products does not make them vaccines, especially when the FDA definition of a gene therapy has not altered to exclude them.  We can only assume that this change in the definition of a vaccine occurred in order to facilitate and fast-track authorisation of these novel products in order to bypass the usual trials and safety net required for non-vaccines because there is sufficient evidence to understand that these mRNA products are potentially inherently unsafe, such that they should only be licensed for use in individual life-saving situations where a congenital genetic disorder exists that so significantly shortens and/or impairs the quality of life that giving gene therapy is worth any risk that the gene therapy represents.

'Brandt's medical ethics, particularly regarding euthanasia, were influenced by Alfred Hoche, whose courses he attended. Like many other German doctors of the period, Brandt came to believe that the health of society as a whole should take precedence over that of its individual members. Because society was viewed as an organism that had to be cured, its weakest, most invalid and incurable members were only parts that should be removed. Such hapless creatures should therefore be granted a "merciful death" (Gnadentod). In addition to these considerations, Brandt's explanation at his trial for his criminal actions – particularly ordering experimentation on human beings – was that "... Any personal code of ethics must give way to the total character of the war".[2] Historian Horst Freyhofer asserts that, in the absence of at least Brandt's tacit approval, it is highly unlikely that the grotesque and cruel medical experiments for which the Nazi doctors are infamous, could have been performed. Brandt and Hitler discussed multiple killing techniques during the initial planning of the euthanasia program, during which Hitler asked Brandt, "which is the most humane way?" Brandt suggested the use of carbon monoxide gas, to which Hitler gave his approval. Hitler instructed Brandt to contact other physicians and begin to coordinate the mass killings.'

‘End of the Medical Profession’: Dr. Meryl Nass’ Charges Took a Backseat to Her Concerns About the WHO + One-Size-Fits-All Medicine

“I was willing to go through this case and potentially lose my license forever because the case at heart is about the doctor-patient relationship and whether doctors and patients will be allowed in the future to decide on the care of the patient or whether there will be intrusions by the federal government,” Dr. Meryl Nass told #CHDTV.

The COVID crisis rapidly increased the erosion of the doctor-patient relationship.

“If doctors don’t have the ability to treat patients individually, there’s no need to have doctors,” warned Dr. Nass.

“If you want to be able to access a doctor who has the right to treat you the way you want to be treated, this case is really important.”

Watch the FULL debrief on Dr. Nass’ case👇

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/maine-medical-board--meryl-nass-md-official-hearing/Meryl-Hearing-Day-7/

Science is not data: science is always a human and subjective, therefore always biased, interpretation of data. The problem lies in the denial of human agency in the deep bias inherent in all scientific work.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706535395964375456

Science is never neutral, and is more often than not used by a group of people for the societal control of others. If religion was the opium of the masses, science is the morphine for the masses.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706550375203942807

The time may have come to face the fact that science in the 21st century has never been anything more but the #midazolam for the masses..

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706555267595292688

You don't need any alternative science to know contagion from influenza-like-illnesses is real: all you need is to have grown up with siblings, or raised them.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706573654224408689

Virology is not a hoax, it is the neat separation of illnesses into either viral or bacterial categories instead of both at the same time which is the hoax.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706576463363735795

https://yandex.com/search/touch/?text=roger+meacock+mrna+truth+for+health&lr=105001&clid=2160746

Dear fellow humans!
We know there are many people from every corner of the world, all calling out the malign nature if what’s happening in many spheres of activity.
Its particularly wonderful to encounter a kindred spirit and Roger Meacock is a brilliant example.
I was recently on a Sunday evening call, recording a podcast for the Truth For Health Foundation. Founder Dr Lee Vliet had made contact with a British veterinarian, Roger Meacock.
How have we not met before??!!
He’s very smart, he’s formed non-commercial partnerships in his field. mRNA based injections masquerading as vaccines, are coming at us so fast.
If any of you had any links to the livestock farming community, it’s so important to reach them with our well-founded concerns about the bigger picture. Vets and farmers need to know what I / we think is going on.
Roger is very concerned about this entire platform, telling us that they’re here already and he expects the regulatory agencies responsible for approval decisions will be pressurised into signing off on these malign “animal healthcare” preparations.
I expect these animals to be injured and perhaps killed by them. Very similar outcomes, such as those prominent in the VAERS database seem likely to me to occur in farm animals. I expect this’ll turn on the relative dose size normalised to the human dose.
The animal welfare aspects of their lives are not in any way going to be helped by these jabs.
One report I saw on such a product in development had 1 in 30 animals die.
Please do what you to warn & assist everyone, noting that this could be a set-up to hit the pause button on our food supply.
Best wishes
Mike

Recent interview with Roger:

https://www.truthforhealth.org/2023/09/mrna-contamination-of-food-supply-threat/

🇺🇸 US MEAT #FOOD

Beef Company CEO: “I’ll Shut Down the Company Before We Ship a Single Bag With mRNA-Injected Meat”

Quickly but quietly, Big Pharma, Big Food, and various state governments are working to inject beef and dairy cattle with mRNA “vaccines.” The practice has been happening with pork since 2018, and beef is next on the agenda.

https://vigilantnews.com/post/beef-company-ceo-ill-shut-down-the-company-before-we-ship-a-single-bag-with-mrna-injected-meat

"Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines as controls. He was ‘shocked’ to find that they were allegedly contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA.

McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines..

..Now, McKernan, Dr Buckhaults and other scientists are calling for urgent research to test whether the DNA contamination is lingering in the cells of mRNA vaccinated people, and whether the human genome has in fact been altered by mRNA Covid vaccines."

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/scientists-shocked-and-alarmed-at-whats-in-the-mrna-shots/

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706582044245905450

This is a remarkable article.
I encourage you to send it to people who’ve previously said “Please stop sending me your conspiracy” or similar.

Who’d have thought that The Spectator would break this story of contaminated injections?
“Regulatory oversight” = RISIBLE.
They “forgot to ask about bacterial DNA”?
How about the manufacturers? They “forgot to mention the circular DNA in finished product and not even list the unnecessary & dangerous SV40 promoter in their product?
That’s not possible to be oversights.
You decide.
I’ve said for years that the entire event is fraud with a key objective being to inject intentionally harmful materials into as many men, women and children as they can persuade to roll up their sleeves, with no possible benefits while assuming risks up to and including death.
I’ve said precisely this in a court filing.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/scientists-shocked-and-alarmed-at-whats-in-the-mrna-shots/

Given there have been a number of articles in Spectator Australia which are critical of the deliberately harmful injections, a sense of relief.
Obviously they can only be classified as “pro conspiracy theorists” and therefore ignored.
Sarc OFF.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/01/are-genetically-modified-vaccines-safe/

https://rumble.com/v3kofkd-unherd-climate-scientist-i-designed-my-research-to-sound-catastrophic.html

This is a remarkable interview. While Brown says humans are wholly responsible for the 1.2C global warming but that it wasn’t a problem & wasn’t about to be a problem.
I have looked at the evidence and we differ in saying we cannot know how much, if any, of the warming is due to humans alone.
I also disagree about net zero, which is a political objective & would kill billions if actually accomplished.
I agree with all the rest. His admissions about how grant funding & paper publication works are unfortunately correct. This used to be small beer, a few charities aiming to be better heard.
But it’s now how a great % of science operates and as a result, I dissociate myself from it.
While the % of papers & claims that are effectively purchased is small, it dominates the pieces that impact public conversations. You also cannot easily tell which parts are bought and paid for.
The effect is that the scientific method that the post enlightenment world has benefited from so much is dead and no more reliable than religion.
Best wishes
Mike

Aly Cook - Freedom New Zealand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X47frDAk9ws

"When COVID-19 jabs were rolled out globally, many women reported heavier-than-usual menstrual bleeding soon after vaccination. Study author Kristine Blix, at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health in Oslo, wanted to look at the trend systematically, particularly in women who don’t normally have periods, such as those taking contraceptives or who have been through menopause. The work is published in Science Advances.
The team didn’t investigate the reasons for the unexplained bleeding, but suggested that it could be linked to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the vaccines. 

They found that 252 postmenopausal women, 1,008 perimenopausal women and 924 premenopausal women reported experiencing unexpected vaginal bleeding.

Of these, roughly half of each group said that the bleeding came in the four weeks after the first or second vaccine dose, or both. Premenopausal and perimenopausal women were most likely to report unexpected bleeding in the month after the vaccine, with their risk being three to five times as high as before the vaccinations existed. The risk for postmenopausal women increased by two- to threefold.

Norway used the mRNA jabs made by Moderna and Pfizer–BioNTech, and other vaccines including the one made by AstraZeneca. In October 2022, the European Medicines Agency updated the side-effect information of mRNA vaccines to include heavy menstrual bleeding."

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02996-6

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1706666970186461526

Was George Best midazolamed?

He went into hosiptal with flu..and then..?

It definitely seems he may have been put into and end of life pathway..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=R3fOFJeqGog

Do you see it, yet..?

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1706711235545256252