"As Aaron David Miller, a Middle East expert at the Woodrow Wilson Center, observes, a strange, self-sustaining relationship remains. Israel's hawkish government — comprising many politicians who have little interest in seeing the creation of a separate Palestinian state — dwells on the security threat that Hamas's crude rockets pose. Hamas depends, Miller writes, on "an ideology and strategy steeped in confrontation and resistance."
And so, he concludes, they are "two parties who can't seem to live with one another — or apparently without one another either."

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1711272446156759190

Haaretz: "The disaster that befell Israel on the holiday of Simchat Torah is the clear responsibility of one person: Benjamin Netanyahu. The prime minister, who has prided himself on his vast political experience and irreplaceable wisdom in security matters, completely failed to identify the dangers he was consciously leading Israel into when establishing a government of annexation and dispossession, when appointing Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir to key positions, while embracing a foreign policy that openly ignored the existence and rights of Palestinians."

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1711285763340390650

No lives saved by C19 vaccines, signed: The Real Science.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1711289742355050646

If there is one thing that 9/11 and the Covid19 vaccines should have taught us, it's that the psychopathic oligarchy will either cause or allow highly visual massacres to occur in order to perpetrate their psychopathic agenda for control, destruction, war, and ultimately for depopulation. Psychopaths like to kill. See "American Psycho" by Brett Easton Ellis for a good portrayal.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1711301336602435989

If there is one thing that 9/11 and the Covid19 vaccines should have taught us, it's that the psychopathic oligarchy will either cause or allow highly visual massacres to occur in order to perpetrate their psychopathic agenda for control, destruction, war, and ultimately for depopulation. Psychopaths like to kill. See "American Psycho" by Brett Easton Ellis for a good portrayal.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1711301495172342193

Image thread: anybody has an image of the Twin Towers as two giant syringes..?

Video thread: anybody has a video of a montage of the Twin Towers collapsing cut with newsreaders collapsing live since 2021?

Some of those who saw through 911 got played by Covid.

Some of those who saw through Covid got played by war in Ukraine.

Some of those who saw through war in Ukraine are getting played now by Hamas.

The Arabic word for human (إنسان) is derived from the root “to forget” (نسيان)

https://x.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1711296907132211650

As we forecasted with @joerogan, global civil war between intersectional groups is a desired objective to facilitate the NEW WORLD ORDER

Europe and the US are being targeted for this. Globalists want chaos.

Rewatch the full episode here:
https://rumble.com/vvexre-must-watch-joe-rogan-talks-with-maajid-nawaz-episode-1780.html

https://x.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1711320245393068510

100% correct.

"Virus or not? Covid under the microscope" By Neville Hodgkinson
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/virus-or-not-covid-under-the-microscope/

"In trying to counter this folly, some influential commentators have gone as far as arguing that the entire pandemic was a money-making invention, with no virus involved at all. Even the very concept of viruses, as infectious pathogens, has been called into question. The idea has proved appealing to many of those dismayed by the deceptions and propaganda to which we are still being subjected on Covid.

Last Wednesday. October 4, the UK Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), an expert group with a strong record in challenging Covid illusions, published a report examining the ‘virus doesn’t exist’ story. https://www.hartgroup.org/virus-model/

The report begins by looking at and ‘supporting’ a case that there was no novel virus, in the sense that people’s immune defences against SARS-CoV-2 were not markedly different from any previous respiratory virus, and the mortality rate was low. Where excess mortality was seen, such as among young people in New York City – who reportedly died in the thousands in spring 2020, but not elsewhere – the causes may have been entirely different.

But for the following reasons, it says, the virus ‘model’ best explains observations surrounding the 2020 outbreak, even though science cannot yet fully explain how viruses spread, and why they cause illness in some people and not in others.

· In most cases, groups of people became ill with similar symptoms after being exposed in a shared environment.

· A unique genetic (RNA) signature was detectable with the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test in people with these symptoms, vastly more often than in well people. Although the test was misused in ways that gave false positives, the RNA sequence looked for was lengthy and specific and the association was real.

· Lateral flow tests, which could be done at home, successfully identified the protein coded for by this sequence.

· Crystallography showed how the structure of the virus’s characteristic spike protein gave it an exceptional ability to infect human cells.

· Sick people went on to produce antibodies to the proteins produced by the RNA sequence.

· When material thought to contain the virus was cultured in cells, the degree of damage done was proportional to the strength of the PCR test result. When laboratory-grown virus was used to infect healthy young people, half developed detectable virus after two days and symptoms of Covid after two to four days.

· Across the world, scientists have conducted a huge amount of sequencing of the virus’s genome, demonstrating how it evolves over time.

· Finally, a respiratory illness was experienced which some people experienced as viral in nature, and with characteristic, unusual symptoms such as loss of taste or smell, and long duration of sickness and cough. Although in other (less panic-driven) circumstances it might have been referred to simply as ‘some weird bug’ or a ‘nasty flu’, clinicians have claimed they could diagnose it without testing, and patients seemed good at knowing whether they had it.

The authors emphasise that none of this tells us anything about the impact of the virus on health or mortality – only that it really did exist.

Two pieces of evidence on which, they say, the ‘no virus’ proponents seem to place a lot of weight are critically examined.

They write: ‘The first is that, unlike say measles and polio, the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not replicate in cells, filling them with virus, before causing them to explode, releasing the particles. Instead, SARS-CoV-2 virus particles are claimed to bud from the cell surface one at a time.

‘The same claim is made for influenza and HIV. It is true that there might therefore be interesting differences between these types of viruses worth exploring, but the umbrella term virus is still useful given their other similarities.

‘The second is the fact that there has never been a pure isolate of SARS-CoV-2 virus (that means a solution containing only virus particles with no cells). This could be because no one has tried hard enough to carry out this work.

‘But let’s assume it is because it is not possible to isolate this virus. What would that mean? It would mean that there is something oversimplified about the explanation given for how viruses are formed and transmitted from person to person which needs more study. It is not enough to discount all other evidence that the virus model is the best fit to explain this illness.’

The report concludes that while the pharmaceutical industry is seen as favouring germ theory for its potential to boost drug sales, holistic health approaches are often perceived as ‘alternative quackery’. Rather than take such extreme positions, ‘it is better to keep gathering evidence to see which model (or models) provide the best explanation for how the world works’.

This is a truly scientific approach, very different from the corruption of scientific process (see examples here and here) which accompanied the rollout of the RNA jabs, and denial of the still unfolding consequences.

Two aspects of the report, however, require comment.

Firstly, it may betray a failure to recognise the panic experienced by those who knew that although this was not a completely ‘novel’ entity, it was genetically engineered as part of the biodefence collaboration between the US and China (and possibly the UK as well – witness the role of the Wellcome Trust’s Jeremy Farrar, now WHO’s chief scientific officer, in trying to hide the laboratory origin of the virus).

Secondly, I would like HART experts to look at the case painstakingly built over several decades by a group of scientists in Perth, Australia, that ‘HIV’, the purported cause of Aids, truly has never been shown to exist as a unique infectious agent, even by conventional virological standards, and despite the hundreds of billions spent on ‘HIV’ research and treatment. In many respects, the evidence shows Aids to be a completely different category of illness from Covid, as described in my recently published book and seven-part TCW series."

HART: Arguments Against "The Virus Doesn't Exist"

"There are two pieces of evidence on which the “no virus” proponents seem to place a lot of weight. The first is that, unlike say measles and polio, the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not replicate in cells, filling them with virus, before causing them to explode, releasing the particles. Instead, SARS-CoV-2 virus particles are claimed to bud from the cell surface one at a time. The same claim is made for influenza and HIV. It is true that there might therefore be interesting differences between these types of viruses worth exploring, but the umbrella term virus is still useful given their other similarities.

The second, is the fact that there has never been a pure isolate of SARS-CoV-2 virus (that means a solution containing only virus particles with no cells). This could be because no-one has tried hard enough to carry out this work. But let’s assume it is because it is not possible to isolate this virus. What would that mean? It would mean that there is something oversimplified about the explanation given for how viruses are formed and transmitted from person to person which needs more study. It is not enough to discount all the other evidence that the virus model is the best fit to explain this illness.

That does not mean that some aspects of the virus model might not be oversimplifications. For example, the idea that everyone is susceptible to viral attack is not supported by real world evidence. Host factors clearly have a major role to play in susceptibility. That knowledge can (and hopefully will) be adopted into the viral model of disease, adapting it to better fit the world.

Navigating the terrain and germ theories of disease requires distinguishing between nuanced and extreme perspectives and taking on board the notion that uncompromising adherence to either of them is problematic. Commercial interests further complicate this landscape, with the pharmaceutical industry seemingly favouring germ theory for its potential to boost drug sales. Meanwhile, promoting holistic health approaches often faces scepticism, perceived as ‘alternative quackery’. Rather than take sides on a debate which has often lost nuance, it is better to keep gathering evidence to see which model (or models) provide the best explanation for how the world works."

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1711358343095140724

ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS - Michael Rivero

WHAT'S GOING ON IN ISRAEL?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=AuZSuuQmezw&feature=shared