I had not seen the second of these short videos from WHO’s Chief Scientist.
In the first, she makes claims that are not relevant to the covid19 gene based injections.
In the second, she states that WHO does not have good enough safety monitoring systems for vaccines in many countries and that adverse effects not infrequently are detected for the first time only after product approval and launch.
I get the impression that she’s not involved in the global fraud. Not then, anyway. If still in post, she has long been involved and is covering up.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gq6CDGgNcFRA/

https://mehu.hku.hk/cibhh-series-session2/

I am intrigued to learn how commonplace (or otherwise) is an awareness of “MEURI”, a WHO guideline which purports to justify use of experimental and/or unproven & unapproved medical interventions, in the setting of public health emergencies.
I has not heard about it until I read several hundred pages of evidence that the human rights campaigning group, “Interest of Justice” filed in pursuit of our appeal against the earlier dismissal of their demand for the suspension of the human use of the emergency use authorised “vaccines” against “covid19”.
IoJ had already demonstrated that the Ministry of Health in their country of Costa Rica had behaved improperly and in direct contravention of various national laws, including, among other things, experimentation on humans without their informed consent. This is the case to be heard in early November, where I am working alongside five extraordinary experts.
While I believe every major institution has been corrupted, infiltrated or otherwise cowed into staying their hands in protecting human life and wellbeing, it’s not beyond the bounds of possibility that a new judge (herself a veteran of the legal system of Costa Rica & a recognised specialist in public law) will uphold our appeal. We’ll take our victories from wherever we can find them.

This MEURI protocol seeks to do impossible things and this WHO document is an attempt to put a legal gloss on what are inevitably illegal acts.
The Nuremberg Code & the Declaration of Helsinki alone absolutely prohibits human medical experimentation without fully informed consent.
WHO seeks to circumvent this intentionally broad definition from Nuremberg and Helsinki for precisely the setting in which we find ourselves, governments and private entities running, roughshod, over long-established human rights frameworks developed in the aftermath of WW2, after the infamous “Doctors’ Trial”.
Anyone injecting people at this point is in my opinion a criminal. It’s understandable that initially, most doctors believed what they were being told. Personally, I struggle to accept that doctors considered it possible that an injected product, constituting novel technology, for which there are no approved products, could ever have been said was safe for use in the general population. That some, perhaps many, did believe this is not flattering to the medical profession.

Please have a look at this “MEURI” document. From a quick look, I’m guessing it would have drawn low whistles of approval by Lewis Carol, George Orwell & Joseph Heller, with a nod in the direction of Franz Kafka, Mervyn Peake & perhaps even Friedrich Nietzsche ☠️

Best wishes
Mike

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240041745

This one minute video was within a prior post, but given most won’t have worked their way through all the videos on CBDC, I am pushing this to the top so you’ll likely all see it.
You may struggle to believe it.
Richard Werner is a serious person and still well connected.
I’m not getting chipped.
In fact, I’m not getting a one global format digital ID, either.
Choose your hill.
Please use cash on every occasion you can.
Even Werner says it raises the hurdle for central banks, the more cash there is circulating. And it’s not as if we’ve handfuls of effective resistance tools.
Best wishes
Mike

https://live.solari.com/videos/watch/28a6beaa-c06a-4f51-8c53-994d3b0b227b

Fraudulent argument. Nobody on the left is "indifferent" to Hamas atrocities. If you fall for this you may as well fast forward to daily mRNA injections & microchipping yourself. The difference is our government does NOT back Hamas, they back Netanyahu.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1717133778089349343

The fundamental internalization of the colonialist attitude is that which projects on the indigenous other what is only functional to the neo-colonial theft of their land, not what the other truly is. In the case of Gaza, the internalized colonialist can only see the inhabitants as "terrorists" because that justifies in the flawed moral scale of values their ethnic cleansing, inherently functional to the hidden colonialist agenda of the theft of their land: the true motive, NOT eradicating terrorism, which the colonialist knows a priori that it can only be achieved through financial, not military means.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1717165614551208140

The bulk of my final salary pension comes from Pfizer.
Paradoxically, if in the future I get a letter telling me it’s regrettably all gone, because Pfizer is bankrupted, I’ll still jog around, cheering.
I mean, I earned it, but I don’t feel great about it.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/on-civil-suits-against-pfizer-for

Any hints at possible motivations for a doctor who had served her patients and society for 40 years without adverse comment? Not even once?

Why in the world would she go public warnings that young people were being coerced into receiving injections they didn’t need?

Is it possible that the benefit to risk ratio isn’t positive? At least for young people not at notable risk from the alleged disease? We know these jabs don’t reduce transmission, so there’s no burden placed on these young people “to get jabbed to save grandma”.

I noticed that the review board cited no evidence to underwrite their verdict that the doctor is wrong.

I wonder if she has the opportunity to appeal? If she does, I’d be pleased to be among expert witnesses to support her concerns about & to embarrass the review board into backing off.

20,000 people signed a petition to reinstate. Make that +1.

Best wishes
Mike

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-67204849

Lowkey, a known British rapper and rights advocate, says the Palestinian people are entitled under international law to defend their land and retrieve their rights, including their right to return, by all means available to them.
#GazaGenocide

No surprises here.

The Independent Alliance is a campaign with one ultimate aim… to end the influence of the global oligarchy who control all the wealth and power. It sounds like a ridiculously big aim but we have to start somewhere so I’ve come up with a plan.

You can find all the details at www.theindependentalliance.org but the super short version is here:

1/ Remove the influence of the global oligarchy on UK elected representatives.

2/ Bypass the fake party system by only fielding independent candidates.

3/ Prevent the current freedom vote being split by offering a “neutral” place for candidates, campaigners and voters who are willing to join together for a temporary alliance like the Allies in WW2 and Churchill’s ministry government.

4/ The new energy and very different manifesto will appeal to non-voters who are the biggest cohort in the UK voting population at 35% for general elections.

5/ We form 650 local committees seeded by the Freedom Movement.

6/ We run a tireless grassroots campaign with a single call to action for the public: vote for your Independent Alliance candidate.

7/ We win and make lots of changes!

8/ Repeat around the world.

9/ Cut off the global oligarchy’s influence.

10/ Live happily ever after but eternally vigilant.

WAITING FOR THE BARBARIANS:
"As with all colonial cultures, in Coetzee’s literary creation it is above all the settlers’ fear of the indigenous Other that both threatens the dominant society and justifies the violence exacted in the name of a search for that always-elusive state of security."

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1717192887157272908

"Every Child Matters"

From Canada with love - A lesson in branding and meaningless virtue signaling.

text follows>

A lesson in branding and meaningless virtue signaling.

+++

Less than one month ago, on September 30, 2023, Canadian Prime Minster Justin Trudeau stated: "Today, I encourage everyone to wear orange in recognition that every child matters...".

This campaign was and is specific to Canada to recognize and reflect on the ongoing legacy of the residential school system under colonization, upon Indigenous land still occupied to this day. Not dissimilar to the terror and ethnic cleansing endured by Palestinians who were displaced from lands under British rule. Land now occupied by Israel.

Shirts, flags and merchandise donning the logo "every child matters", created seas of orange from coast to coast. Government, NGOs, corporations, in tandem with media, promoted the campaign. For days, political posturing and virtue signalling flooded social media, airwaves, and sidewalks.

The "orange shirt day" is said to honour "the experiences of Indigenous Peoples, celebrates resilience and affirms a commitment that "every child matters." (Note it is a celebration of resilience – rather than resistance.)

Millions of citizens made a point of consuming and displaying merchandise in order to demonstrate to others that they held this value - that "every child matters", with politicians at the forefront.

Where are these people today?

Since Oct 7, 2023, the terrorist state known as Israel has murdered over 3,000 Palestinian children.

From millions wearing "every child matters" t-shirts, hanging banners and waving flags, to collective silence and complicity.

The empty marketing campaign (to placate genocide and appease white guilt) becomes transparent at once - true racist values remain firmly intact.

The hypocrisy is blatant. It is ugly.

It is unforgiveable.

It will not be forgotten.