Forwarded from Geopolitics & Empire
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rob Roos: Very bad news. The European Parliament and Member States just reached an agreement on introducing the Digital Identity, eID.
Directly afterwards, EU Commissioner Breton said: "Now that we have a Digital Identity Wallet, we have to put something in it...", suggesting a connection between CBDC and eID.
They ignored all the privacy experts and security specialists. They're pushing it all through.
I am not optimistic. But it is not too late yet. Parliament still has to vote about this. Let your MEP know that you oppose the Digital Identity and that you want your MEP to vote against it!
Directly afterwards, EU Commissioner Breton said: "Now that we have a Digital Identity Wallet, we have to put something in it...", suggesting a connection between CBDC and eID.
They ignored all the privacy experts and security specialists. They're pushing it all through.
I am not optimistic. But it is not too late yet. Parliament still has to vote about this. Let your MEP know that you oppose the Digital Identity and that you want your MEP to vote against it!
🤬211👍18😱16😢9❤5
Father claims AstraZeneca's Covid vaccine is 'defective' as the drugs giant faces a landmark High Court battle over the accusations | Daily Mail Online
"Drugs giant AstraZeneca faces a landmark High Court battle over accusations that some doses of its Covid-19 vaccine were 'defective' and claims of its efficacy were 'vastly overstated'."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12727185/Father-claims-AstraZenecas-Covid-vaccine-defective-drugs-giant-faces-landmark-High-Court-battle-accusations.html
"Drugs giant AstraZeneca faces a landmark High Court battle over accusations that some doses of its Covid-19 vaccine were 'defective' and claims of its efficacy were 'vastly overstated'."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12727185/Father-claims-AstraZenecas-Covid-vaccine-defective-drugs-giant-faces-landmark-High-Court-battle-accusations.html
Mail Online
Father claims AstraZeneca's Covid vaccine is 'defective'
Bringing the court action is IT engineer Jamie Scott, who suffered a brain haemorrhage the day after his first AstraZeneca jab, leaving him with permanent brain damage.
👍70❤12🔥8
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WAS A DEW USED ON OCTOBER 7th?
RT published this footage given to them by Israel of the result of the Hamas attack at the rave on October 7th. This is claimed and assumed to be the parking lot at the rave. Israel claimed Hamas did this. With a few gliders and automatic rifles, perhaps a few grenades?
This looks like the result of massive weapons, or a DEW: Directed Energy Weapon. I would not be surprised if Netanyahu, under advice of the CIA, was one of the first to use it against both Hamas and his own people, as that is also what he did with the toxic Covid injections, again under advice of the CIA.
Is it now clearer how 1,400 Israelis could have died on October 7th?
Is it not clearer why they said from the beginning that October 7th is Israel's 9/11?
We should not rule anything out.
We should keep asking questions.
All possibilities need to be examined.
Nothing is certain simply because one side gives an account of what happened.
This is a possibility, whether you like it or not, not a certainty.
RT published this footage given to them by Israel of the result of the Hamas attack at the rave on October 7th. This is claimed and assumed to be the parking lot at the rave. Israel claimed Hamas did this. With a few gliders and automatic rifles, perhaps a few grenades?
This looks like the result of massive weapons, or a DEW: Directed Energy Weapon. I would not be surprised if Netanyahu, under advice of the CIA, was one of the first to use it against both Hamas and his own people, as that is also what he did with the toxic Covid injections, again under advice of the CIA.
Is it now clearer how 1,400 Israelis could have died on October 7th?
Is it not clearer why they said from the beginning that October 7th is Israel's 9/11?
We should not rule anything out.
We should keep asking questions.
All possibilities need to be examined.
Nothing is certain simply because one side gives an account of what happened.
This is a possibility, whether you like it or not, not a certainty.
👍115😱31❤17🤔17💯11🔥2😁2🥴1
That some see one side as terrorist, but not the other when it does the same or worse, is a testimony to the almost unlimited capacity for human bias & denial, which is the same reason why science failed as an Enlightenment project, the Covid "vaccines" as science's Swan Song.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722528804969513148
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722528804969513148
X (formerly Twitter)
Robin Monotti on X
That some see one side as terrorist, but not the other when it does the same or worse, is a testimony to the almost unlimited capacity for human bias & denial, which is the same reason why science failed as an Enlightenment project, the Covid "vaccines" as…
👍38💯17🔥3❤1👌1
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
Everything You Never Wanted to Know About "Operation Lockstep"
EXTRACTS:
...My purpose is to put to rest the enduring myth that these documents call for or in any way predict the mass containment forced vaccination regime imposed on us in 2020....
Contrary to many claims, “Lock Step” is not an “operation” or a “simulation” (Kennedy’s term) or a pandemic planning document at all. It’s rather a chapter in a May 2010 pamphlet called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (SFTID), which the Rockefeller Foundation commissioned from the Global Business Network (GBN) – a now-defunct consulting firm co-founded by relentless self-promoter and alleged “futurist” Peter Schwartz.
The GBN claimed to specialise in something called “scenario planning,” which, to judge from this document, amounts to spinning up alternative stories about the future which “spark insight,” “engage exploration” and “highlight undiscovered areas.” Other consulting firms write lengthy reports detailing risks and opportunities, but not the GBN. They take these risks and opportunities and bury them beneath underrealised egregiously boring pulp-fiction narratives that distracted self-important philanthropist types find much easier to read.
To be specific, the GBN concocted four short stories for the Rockefeller Foundation, for the purposes of “build[ing] on the … Foundation’s growing body of work in the emerging field of pro-poor foresight.” These stories – and I apologise that I cannot find any more engaging way to phrase this sentence – explore how technological innovation and globalisation might interact to shape the future of philanthropy. The text considers possibilities along two axes, namely the degree to which peoples of the future will be subjected to nebulous international forces beyond their oversight and control (“political and economic alignment”), and the degree to which they will benefit from cool new technology and stuff (“adaptive capacity”).
These parameters yield four possible future scenarios: 1) An internationally integrated world abounding in cool new tech (“Clever Together”), 2) an internationally dis-integrated world that still manages cool new tech (“Smart Scramble”), 3) an internationally dis-integrated world without cool new tech (“Hack Attack”), and most notoriously 4), an internationally integrated world also without cool new tech (“Lock Step”).
Obviously, the philanthropists at the Rockefeller Foundation and their GBN consultants would prefer to live in a world characterised by strong globaloid influencers and new gadgets. “Clever Together” is therefore their preferred scenario. They would very much like not to live in a world of no globaloid influence and no new gadgets, which is why you’d think “Hack Attack” would be their alternative dystopian nightmare. Indeed they’re not happy about it, but for reasons we’ll explore below, “Lock Step” is equally if not more abhorred. This is the first point I hope to impress on the discourse surrounding this thing: “Lock Step” is not a plan, it is not a simulation, and neither the Rockefeller Foundation nor the GBN want “Lock Step” to happen. “Lock Step” is a world in which a pandemic marginalises the influence of the globaloid goons and everything sucks....
“Lock Step” is the dystopian counter-vision to these heady fantasies of technocratic international utopia. It opens in 2012, with an “extremely virulent and deadly” pandemic influenza, which infects 20% of the world population, killing 8 million people in seven months (a .57% IFR). The US issues mere travel advisories but never interferes with international travel, “accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.”...
(continued below)
EXTRACTS:
...My purpose is to put to rest the enduring myth that these documents call for or in any way predict the mass containment forced vaccination regime imposed on us in 2020....
Contrary to many claims, “Lock Step” is not an “operation” or a “simulation” (Kennedy’s term) or a pandemic planning document at all. It’s rather a chapter in a May 2010 pamphlet called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (SFTID), which the Rockefeller Foundation commissioned from the Global Business Network (GBN) – a now-defunct consulting firm co-founded by relentless self-promoter and alleged “futurist” Peter Schwartz.
The GBN claimed to specialise in something called “scenario planning,” which, to judge from this document, amounts to spinning up alternative stories about the future which “spark insight,” “engage exploration” and “highlight undiscovered areas.” Other consulting firms write lengthy reports detailing risks and opportunities, but not the GBN. They take these risks and opportunities and bury them beneath underrealised egregiously boring pulp-fiction narratives that distracted self-important philanthropist types find much easier to read.
To be specific, the GBN concocted four short stories for the Rockefeller Foundation, for the purposes of “build[ing] on the … Foundation’s growing body of work in the emerging field of pro-poor foresight.” These stories – and I apologise that I cannot find any more engaging way to phrase this sentence – explore how technological innovation and globalisation might interact to shape the future of philanthropy. The text considers possibilities along two axes, namely the degree to which peoples of the future will be subjected to nebulous international forces beyond their oversight and control (“political and economic alignment”), and the degree to which they will benefit from cool new technology and stuff (“adaptive capacity”).
These parameters yield four possible future scenarios: 1) An internationally integrated world abounding in cool new tech (“Clever Together”), 2) an internationally dis-integrated world that still manages cool new tech (“Smart Scramble”), 3) an internationally dis-integrated world without cool new tech (“Hack Attack”), and most notoriously 4), an internationally integrated world also without cool new tech (“Lock Step”).
Obviously, the philanthropists at the Rockefeller Foundation and their GBN consultants would prefer to live in a world characterised by strong globaloid influencers and new gadgets. “Clever Together” is therefore their preferred scenario. They would very much like not to live in a world of no globaloid influence and no new gadgets, which is why you’d think “Hack Attack” would be their alternative dystopian nightmare. Indeed they’re not happy about it, but for reasons we’ll explore below, “Lock Step” is equally if not more abhorred. This is the first point I hope to impress on the discourse surrounding this thing: “Lock Step” is not a plan, it is not a simulation, and neither the Rockefeller Foundation nor the GBN want “Lock Step” to happen. “Lock Step” is a world in which a pandemic marginalises the influence of the globaloid goons and everything sucks....
“Lock Step” is the dystopian counter-vision to these heady fantasies of technocratic international utopia. It opens in 2012, with an “extremely virulent and deadly” pandemic influenza, which infects 20% of the world population, killing 8 million people in seven months (a .57% IFR). The US issues mere travel advisories but never interferes with international travel, “accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.”...
(continued below)
👍20❤10🥴1
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
(continued from above)
...China, however, resorts to authoritarian measures, including “quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens” and the “instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders.” These measures “save millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”
Other nations react much the same way:
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
“Citizens” at first accept the new draconian regime and are “eager for top-down direction and oversight.” The first-world imposes “biometric IDs for all citizens” as well as “tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.”...
...There is a rise in “virulent nationalism”; the “top-down rules and norms” harm “entrepreneurial activity,” and in the longer term there is political unrest:
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away—largely in developing countries—incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.
“Lock Step” is a world in which “philanthropic organizations … face hard choices” and “Many governments … place severe restrictions on the program areas and geographies that international philanthropies can work in.” Also too, “organizations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms” are “blocked at many nations’ borders.”...
Not only is “Lock Step” not a sequence of events even remotely desired by the Rockefeller Foundation or the GBN, but there is also nothing all that prescient about its details. They are lifted, very transparently, from the Chinese response to SARS. After an initial period of reluctance to acknowledge the outbreak in 2003, China responded with extreme aggression, quarantining not only contacts of documented cases but also imposing proto-lockdowns on select hospitals and housing units, and closing all manner of public-facing businesses and institutions in affected areas. They even mobilised the population in a “People’s War” against the virus to encourage community-level case reporting, and they established temperature screenings at the entrances to public buildings and offices. Community masking became the norm across Asia.
Theses of “Operation Lockstep” as a pandemic plan for the Corona era represent a complete misreading of SFTID....
CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/everything-you-never-wanted-to-know
#ThreeEleven #OperationLockstep #Plandemic #China #SARS #Rockefellers
...China, however, resorts to authoritarian measures, including “quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens” and the “instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders.” These measures “save millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”
Other nations react much the same way:
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
“Citizens” at first accept the new draconian regime and are “eager for top-down direction and oversight.” The first-world imposes “biometric IDs for all citizens” as well as “tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.”...
...There is a rise in “virulent nationalism”; the “top-down rules and norms” harm “entrepreneurial activity,” and in the longer term there is political unrest:
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away—largely in developing countries—incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.
“Lock Step” is a world in which “philanthropic organizations … face hard choices” and “Many governments … place severe restrictions on the program areas and geographies that international philanthropies can work in.” Also too, “organizations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms” are “blocked at many nations’ borders.”...
Not only is “Lock Step” not a sequence of events even remotely desired by the Rockefeller Foundation or the GBN, but there is also nothing all that prescient about its details. They are lifted, very transparently, from the Chinese response to SARS. After an initial period of reluctance to acknowledge the outbreak in 2003, China responded with extreme aggression, quarantining not only contacts of documented cases but also imposing proto-lockdowns on select hospitals and housing units, and closing all manner of public-facing businesses and institutions in affected areas. They even mobilised the population in a “People’s War” against the virus to encourage community-level case reporting, and they established temperature screenings at the entrances to public buildings and offices. Community masking became the norm across Asia.
Theses of “Operation Lockstep” as a pandemic plan for the Corona era represent a complete misreading of SFTID....
CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/everything-you-never-wanted-to-know
#ThreeEleven #OperationLockstep #Plandemic #China #SARS #Rockefellers
Eugyppius
Everything You Never Wanted to Know About "Operation Lockstep"
This is the second instalment (the first is here) in an ongoing series, in which I propose to examine the various pandemic wargame and planning scenarios in detail, one after the other.
👍33❤9💯3🥴2
Robin Monotti
Why they are desperate for WW3. The problem for them is if they are seen to start it they lose European and Arab support entirely.
"The 🇺🇸 national debt is over $33.5 trillion with the yearly interest of over $1 trillion, 🇬🇧 public debt is over 100% of GDP and Deutsche Bank is on a brink of collapse.
This is a much bigger reason for WW3 than anything else they try to serve via #MSM
WW3 = #BankersWar"
[Gruban Malic]
This is a much bigger reason for WW3 than anything else they try to serve via #MSM
WW3 = #BankersWar"
[Gruban Malic]
👍36💯16🙏2❤1
I've gone public with the rave damage to cars issue on X. If you have any public comments you would like to make you can make them on X at this post:
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722545190664106371
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722545190664106371
X (formerly Twitter)
Robin Monotti (@robinmonotti) on X
This RT footage is claimed to be from the rave car park. Anybody who buys the corporate media account of October 7th, still needs to give a convincing explanation of how the al-Qassam brigades, who unless the border posts were open for them could only carry…
👍44🤔6❤1😁1
After just over 20 seconds you can see cars parked in rows.
This RT footage is claimed to be from the rave car park.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722565720385486964?t=83FUI9_tp_aveXwcuDvn4w&s=19
This RT footage is claimed to be from the rave car park.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722565720385486964?t=83FUI9_tp_aveXwcuDvn4w&s=19
👍20❤3😁2
All the above could be the result of weapons fired from Apache helicopters. I would just like to see where in corporate media there is an acknowledgement that the vast majority of the Israeli victims of the October 7th attack were most likely killed by the IDF and not by the Al-Qassam brigades?
Is there a single article on Western corporate media that states this clearly?
If there is, please post below in the comments a link to the article.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722569713576808547
Is there a single article on Western corporate media that states this clearly?
If there is, please post below in the comments a link to the article.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722569713576808547
👍32🔥4💯2😁1
The description of this footage from China says the cars were moved from the rave to this scrapyard.
So the cars may have been moved from their original positions at the rave to a junkyard. They may have been further damaged by lifting cranes. However the nature of the original questions posed on the extent of damage, and admission of use of Apache helicopters & resulting in massive Israeli civilian casualties from the IDF in corporate media still remain valid.
https://youtu.be/BiyOK88CxYQ?feature=shared
So the cars may have been moved from their original positions at the rave to a junkyard. They may have been further damaged by lifting cranes. However the nature of the original questions posed on the extent of damage, and admission of use of Apache helicopters & resulting in massive Israeli civilian casualties from the IDF in corporate media still remain valid.
https://youtu.be/BiyOK88CxYQ?feature=shared
YouTube
Drone footage show scrapyard of cars damaged in the October 7 Hamas attacks
Cars damaged during the October 7 Hamas attacks that killed 1,400 people have been moved to a junkyard in southern Israel. Around 1,500 vehicles were damaged or burnt in the attacks according to tax officers
For more:
https://www.cgtn.com/europe
Social…
For more:
https://www.cgtn.com/europe
Social…
🤔14👍6❤4😁1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Claims that this is a video of the Apache helicopters firing on October 7th
Here is an Israeli source:
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-military/6361323ddea5a810/Article-02cfdbceafc4b81027.htm
Anything on Western corporate media?
Here is an Israeli source:
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-military/6361323ddea5a810/Article-02cfdbceafc4b81027.htm
Anything on Western corporate media?
👍17🤯11😁1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
More footage claimed to be of the Apache helicopters firing on October 7th
Here is an Israeli source:
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-military/6361323ddea5a810/Article-02cfdbceafc4b81027.htm
Anything on Western corporate media?
Here is an Israeli source:
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-military/6361323ddea5a810/Article-02cfdbceafc4b81027.htm
Anything on Western corporate media?
👍23🤔4😁1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ISRAEL, OCTOBER 7th 2023:
"Deception to IDF helicopters"
Israeli mainstream media released this video of Israeli Defence Forces helicopters firing on October 7th. This is likely to be the reason for a large number of the 1,400 Israeli victims: "The pilots fired at the cross of the fence, and also right inside the localities. Pilots received information from the ground on mobile. In 4 hours, about 300 targets."
Is there anything about this on Western corporate media?
Should Western corporate media not take a leaf from Israeli media and not be more precise about the correct sequence of events and attribution of the real cause of death of the 1,400 Israelis who died on the day of the Al-Qassam attack?
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722580440236646563
"Deception to IDF helicopters"
Israeli mainstream media released this video of Israeli Defence Forces helicopters firing on October 7th. This is likely to be the reason for a large number of the 1,400 Israeli victims: "The pilots fired at the cross of the fence, and also right inside the localities. Pilots received information from the ground on mobile. In 4 hours, about 300 targets."
Is there anything about this on Western corporate media?
Should Western corporate media not take a leaf from Israeli media and not be more precise about the correct sequence of events and attribution of the real cause of death of the 1,400 Israelis who died on the day of the Al-Qassam attack?
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722580440236646563
👍32❤3😁2
Hamas deception to IDF helicopters and targeting of pilots in Wattsap | Air Force on Day1 - Ynet Israel 15.10.23
"After the pilots realized that there was tremendous difficulty in distinguishing within the posts and localities occupied by a terrorist and a soldier or civilian, A decision was made that the first mission of the battle helicopters and the armed forces was to stop the flood of terrorists and murderous crowds that flocked to Israeli territory through breaches of the fence. Twenty-eight combat helicopters fired all ammunition in their stomachs throughout the day of combat, in re-armament rounds. These are hundreds of 30mm cannon shells (effect of spray grenade per shell) as well as Halpier missiles. The pace of shooting in front of the thousands of terrorists was tremendous at first, and only at one point did the pilots begin to slow down the attacks and carefully select the target"
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
"After the pilots realized that there was tremendous difficulty in distinguishing within the posts and localities occupied by a terrorist and a soldier or civilian, A decision was made that the first mission of the battle helicopters and the armed forces was to stop the flood of terrorists and murderous crowds that flocked to Israeli territory through breaches of the fence. Twenty-eight combat helicopters fired all ammunition in their stomachs throughout the day of combat, in re-armament rounds. These are hundreds of 30mm cannon shells (effect of spray grenade per shell) as well as Halpier missiles. The pace of shooting in front of the thousands of terrorists was tremendous at first, and only at one point did the pilots begin to slow down the attacks and carefully select the target"
https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
🤬29❤6👍2
"A looming technocratic governance system powered by three foundational components: digital ID, digital payments like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and massive data sharing.”
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722598246776795208
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1722598246776795208
🤬59👍4❤1