Are the claims on transhumanism being a technological upgrade of Kabbalistic philosophy true or even justified as a theory?

➡️ t.me/RobinMG

Epstein flight logs released in USA vs. Maxwell

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165424-epstein-flight-logs-released-in-usa-vs-maxwell

ON EPSTEIN FLIGHTS:
-WEF YGL
-Rockefeller funded
-worked with covid forecasting IHME at University of Washington
-American Medical Association board member
-Gates foundation for special programs
-China World Health Organization"

➡️ t.me/RobinMG

The way to address the real societal fear of death from contagious respiratory viruses and from pandemics is not the knee-jerk emotional counter reaction: "contagion, viruses and pandemics don't exist", but to state the simple fact that nobody is going to die from a viral respiratory infection if treated with enough wide spectrum antibiotics once they develop pneumonia. General rule of thumb doctors use in the UK NHS is 3 days without high temperature coming down: start giving antibiotics.

The problem was that in 2020 SOMEONE told them not to give antibiotics for Covid. WHO told them, and why? WHO disseminated this message on social media? Where is the evidence of where this medical malpractice started?

Because THAT is what killed people: untreated or too late treated pneumonia, simple dehydration in care homes, lack of family support via the eradication of family visits to care homes and hospitals, toxic drugs administered instead of antibiotics: like midazolam and remdesivir, and mechanical ventilation itself a known killer.

The 2020 SARSCoV2 symptoms were easily treated if not for this BAD SCIENCE. Where did it come from?

This was not just a "mistake".

➡️ t.me/RobinMG

These instant bot-like replies to the above post on X are also not just BAD SCIENCE. They are not just a mistake.

Regardless of scientific merit or not, these replies are part of a clear STRATEGY.

You need to be blind not to see it.

It's not science that is attempted here, but a strategy of division by placing a radical "extremist" or perceived as such fringe view in power in the freedom movement. In order to then destroy it based on the "extremist" nature of this denialist view.

This is ALWAYS the strategy of Empire. If you can see it happening in countries, then do not be blind to it in movements.

➡️ t.me/RobinMG

Antibiotics treat the dangerous severe symptoms of respiratory viral infections which are always bacterial pneumonia. They treat the symptoms of the illness not the virus itself, although they can do that too in the case of tetracyclines and some other antibiotics.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-020-04860-8

➡️ t.me/RobinMG

➡️ t.me/RobinMG

WHAT HAPPENS IN A VIRAL-BACTERIAL RESPIRATORY INFECTION?
What actually happens is that the virus infected cells are killed by the immune system, and the dead cells become a reservoir for harmful bacteria to thrive on. This bacteria then extends beyond the dead cells to the healthy cells and infects them, starting another immune system process. Zinc is the main antiviral component in this case as well as vitamins C & D, and Zinc ionophores like hydroxychloroquine, quercetin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). Antibiotics are the main anti-bacterial treatment.

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

Palestinian Christian Leader: "History Will Hold You Accountable" Over Gaza

https://youtube.com/watch?v=I7tAxR5mzUk&feature=shared

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

I categorically refuse the dualistic binary framing of germ versus terrain theory. To even begin thinking in such an alien black and white way is completely misunderstanding the complex interconnectedness of human biology, where everything is connected and everything affects everything else. If you even begin thinking like that you have fallen victim to a psyop. Biology does not work in binary terms.

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

1 January 2024

An Open Letter to the American People from Signatories of this
Declaration of Military Accountability (DMA)

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” –John Adams

In the course of human events it sometimes becomes necessary to admonish the lawless, encourage the fainthearted, and strengthen the weak. We have reached just such a time in our history.

The affairs of our nation are now steeped in avaricious corruption and our once stalwart institutions, including the Dept of Defense, are failing to fulfill the moral obligations upon which they were founded.

Standing upon our natural and constitutional rights, we hereby apprise the American people that we have exhausted all internal efforts to rectify recent criminal activity within the Armed Forces....

We intend to rebuild trust and restore the rule of law, particularly within the Armed Forces.

While implementing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, military leaders broke the law, trampled constitutional rights, denied informed consent, permitted unwilling medical experimentation, and suppressed the free exercise of religion.

Service members and families were significantly harmed by these actions.

Their suffering continues to be felt financially, emotionally, and physically. Some service members became part of our ever-growing veteran homeless population, some developed debilitating vaccine injuries, and some even lost their lives.

In an apparent attempt to avoid accountability, military leaders are continuing to ignore our communications regarding these injuries and the laws that were broken....

These individuals enabled lawlessness and the unwilling experimentation on service members. The moral and physical injuries they helped inflict are significant.

These leaders refused to resign or take any other action to hold themselves accountable, nor have they attempted to repair the harm their policies and actions have caused.

Since there has yet to be any accountability, the undersigned give our word to do everything morally permissible and legally possible to hold our own leadership accountable.

We intend to rebuild trust by demonstrating that leaders cannot cast aside constitutional rights or the law for political expediency.

However, as service members and veterans, we feel particularly responsible for the DoD and, in accordance with our oaths, we will make every effort to demonstrate by example, how an institution can put its own house in order.

We the undersigned, on behalf of hundreds of thousands of service members and the American people, while appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for guidance and purity of intention, mutually pledge to each other that we will do everything in our power, through lawful word and action, to hold accountable military leaders who failed to follow the law when their leadership and moral courage was most desperately needed.

In the coming years, thousands within our network will run for Congress and seek appointments to executive branch offices, while those of us still serving on active duty will continue to put fulfilling our oaths ahead of striving for rank or position.

For those who achieve the lawful authority to do so, we pledge to recall from retirement the military leaders who broke the law and will convene courts-martial for the crimes they committed.

For those of us who attain legislative offices, we pledge to introduce legislation to remove all retirement income for the military leaders who were criminally complicit, and we will ensure none serve in or retire from the Senior Executive Service"

Link to the full letter and signatories: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24250229-declaration-of-military-accountability

General Mike Flynn: https://x.com/genflynn/status/1741975852500340754?s=52

Admiral Mike Rogers and the importance of THE OATH: https://twitter.com/jimmyfalk_55/status/1741977328891076843?s=52

Declaration of Military Accountability - Online meeting link

MSM Article

The governments of the collective West are now escalating war simultaneously in 5 places.
🇷🇺Russia
🇨🇳China
🇮🇷Iran
🇾🇪Yemen
🇵🇸Palestine
This is madness.
#StopTheWar

🔥 Malaysia upholds the Genocide Convention 1948

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

Whether you like it or not, these are the new definitions which the majority of people in the world adhere to when using these words. The classical definition linking pandemics to huge numbers of deaths is history. It no longer applies. This is the reality of the English language in 2024.

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

Rapid Progression of Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster Shot: A Case Report

"Vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine might induce rapid progression of AngioImmunoblastic T cell Lymphoma (AITL)"
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.798095/full

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

There is a link between Israel, Epstein, Bill Gates Covid19, & mRNA shots

Very few are uncovering it.

The key name linking them is Melanie Walker.

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

Dr. Melanie S. Walker: ties to Epstein AND Bill Gates: How Melanie Walker met billionaire pedophile who found her 'very attractive' before she served as top advisor to Gates' foundation'

-She is a mutual acquaintance of Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, according to a new report 
-Walker met Epstein in 1992 while she was traveling in New York City; Epstein approached her alongside Donald Trump at the Plaza Hotel 
-Microsoft co-founder began relationship with convicted pedophile in 2011, according to The New York Times 
-Gates was introduced to Epstein through the science adviser of his foundation, Boris Nikolic 
-Nikolic struck up a friendship with Epstein, whom he had met through Melanie Walker 
-Walker met Epstein after she graduated from college in 1992 and was hired as his science adviser before she joined the Gates Foundation years later "

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9875463/Neurosurgeon-wife-Microsoft-boss-close-ties-Jeffrey-Epstein-Bill-Gates.html

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀

Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner

Washington D.C., December 12, 2017 – U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University

The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels. 
The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.”

The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO.

This latter idea of special status for the GDR territory was codified in the final German unification treaty signed on September 12, 1990, by the Two-Plus-Four foreign ministers (see Document 25). The former idea about “closer to the Soviet borders” is written down not in treaties but in multiple memoranda of conversation between the Soviets and the highest-level Western interlocutors (Genscher, Kohl, Baker, Gates, Bush, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Major, Woerner, and others) offering assurances throughout 1990 and into 1991 about protecting Soviet security interests and including the USSR in new European security structures. The two issues were related but not the same. Subsequent analysis sometimes conflated the two and argued that the discussion did not involve all of Europe. The documents published below show clearly that it did.
The “Tutzing formula” immediately became the center of a flurry of important diplomatic discussions over the next 10 days in 1990, leading to the crucial February 10, 1990, meeting in Moscow between Kohl and Gorbachev when the West German leader achieved Soviet assent in principle to German unification in NATO, as long as NATO did not expand to the east. The Soviets would need much more time to work with their domestic opinion (and financial aid from the West Germans) before formally signing the deal in September 1990.

As late as March 1991, according to the diary of the British ambassador to Moscow, British Prime Minister John Major personally assured Gorbachev, “We are not talking about the strengthening of NATO.” Subsequently, when Soviet defense minister Marshal Dmitri Yazov asked Major about East European leaders’ interest in NATO membership, the British leader responded, “Nothing of the sort will happen."

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀