US scientists proposed making viruses with features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan
"American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from that city, according to documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know.
Specifically, the scientists sought to insert furin cleavage sites at the S1/S2 junction of the spike protein; to assemble sysetic viruses in six segments; to identify coronaviruses up to 25 percent different from SARS; and to select for receptor binding domains adept at infecting human receptors.
The genome of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, matches the viruses described in the research proposal:
SARS-CoV-2 emerged highly infectious without evolving much in humans. The virus “came out of the box ready to infect.” The receptor binding domain appeared “finely tuned” for the human ACE2 receptor yet had little genetic variation when first spilling over into humans, presenting a difficult “paradox” to virologists who sought to prove it emerged naturally. The documents confirm the scientists working with the Wuhan lab sought to select for receptor binding domains that bind well to human ACE2 in their research.
The genome of SARS-CoV-2 falls within the range of a 25 percent genetic difference from SARS.
The documents reveal for the first time that a virologist working with the Wuhan lab planned to engineer new spike proteins – in contrast with the collaboration’s public work to insert whole spike proteins into viral backbones. Language in the proposal indicates this work may have involved unpublished viruses, generating unpublished engineered spike proteins.
This American virologist, University of North Carolina Prof. Ralph Baric, was set to engineer twenty or more “chimeric” SARS-related viral spike proteins per year of the proposal, and two to five full-length engineered SARS-related viruses.
Documents previously reported by U.S. Right to Know show that some of the experimentation would secretly occur in Wuhan at a lower biosafety level than specified in the grant, apparently to save costs."
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
"American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from that city, according to documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know.
Specifically, the scientists sought to insert furin cleavage sites at the S1/S2 junction of the spike protein; to assemble sysetic viruses in six segments; to identify coronaviruses up to 25 percent different from SARS; and to select for receptor binding domains adept at infecting human receptors.
The genome of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, matches the viruses described in the research proposal:
SARS-CoV-2 emerged highly infectious without evolving much in humans. The virus “came out of the box ready to infect.” The receptor binding domain appeared “finely tuned” for the human ACE2 receptor yet had little genetic variation when first spilling over into humans, presenting a difficult “paradox” to virologists who sought to prove it emerged naturally. The documents confirm the scientists working with the Wuhan lab sought to select for receptor binding domains that bind well to human ACE2 in their research.
The genome of SARS-CoV-2 falls within the range of a 25 percent genetic difference from SARS.
The documents reveal for the first time that a virologist working with the Wuhan lab planned to engineer new spike proteins – in contrast with the collaboration’s public work to insert whole spike proteins into viral backbones. Language in the proposal indicates this work may have involved unpublished viruses, generating unpublished engineered spike proteins.
This American virologist, University of North Carolina Prof. Ralph Baric, was set to engineer twenty or more “chimeric” SARS-related viral spike proteins per year of the proposal, and two to five full-length engineered SARS-related viruses.
Documents previously reported by U.S. Right to Know show that some of the experimentation would secretly occur in Wuhan at a lower biosafety level than specified in the grant, apparently to save costs."
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
U.S. Right to Know
US scientists proposed to make viruses with unique features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan
American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from that city.
🤬34👍18❤15🔥1🤔1
As I always said, SARSCoV2, was one of many gain of function chimeric SARS viruses. The other 20 had/have different spike proteins. This is why they hid isolation sequences to not show there are different ones. Confirmed by the documents above. Gain of function virus deniers have now been proved wrong on all counts by the documents above. Stop listening to them. They are chaos agents who are unable to accept they got it all wrong.
https://t.me/robinmg/33697
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
https://t.me/robinmg/33697
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
👍49😐4❤1
Robin Monotti pinned «US scientists proposed making viruses with features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan "American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from that…»
"This American virologist, University of North Carolina Prof. Ralph Baric, was set to engineer twenty or more “chimeric” SARS-related viral spike proteins per year of the proposal, and two to five full-length engineered SARS-related viruses.
Documents previously reported by U.S. Right to Know show that some of the experimentation would secretly occur in Wuhan at a lower biosafety level than specified in the grant, apparently to save costs."
Emily Kopp
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1748228279708840201
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
Documents previously reported by U.S. Right to Know show that some of the experimentation would secretly occur in Wuhan at a lower biosafety level than specified in the grant, apparently to save costs."
Emily Kopp
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1748228279708840201
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
👍29🤬27❤5🔥1
Following from above, the "variants" were in fact these 20-a-year lab created chimeric "SARS" coronaviruses with different spike proteins all modified by Ralph Baric et al in these Chinese low safety labs, or even elsewhere.
This explains why some of the more frail people died, some had severe disease, while some had a mild cold: it was all viruses with different spike proteins which had varying potential to create severe disease, or not.
This also explains why it was possible to get infected by "SARSCoV2" more than once: it was different viruses.
What is likely to have been circulating between 2019 & 2022, was a series of different chimeric viruses: SARSCoV2, SARSCoV3, SARSCoV4 all the way to SARSCoV20, and that was 20 in a single year...
This is all in the documents:
https://t.me/robinmg/33678
Related article
t.me/robinmg/33700
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
This explains why some of the more frail people died, some had severe disease, while some had a mild cold: it was all viruses with different spike proteins which had varying potential to create severe disease, or not.
This also explains why it was possible to get infected by "SARSCoV2" more than once: it was different viruses.
What is likely to have been circulating between 2019 & 2022, was a series of different chimeric viruses: SARSCoV2, SARSCoV3, SARSCoV4 all the way to SARSCoV20, and that was 20 in a single year...
This is all in the documents:
https://t.me/robinmg/33678
Related article
t.me/robinmg/33700
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
👍23🤔14❤5😢2🔥1
'German scientists have uncovered startling evidence that a substantial portion of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine deployed in the European Union may in fact have consisted of placebos – and hence were not even subjected to quality-control testing by the German agency which was in principle responsible for approving their release.'
"The scientists, Dr. Gerald Dyker, Professor of Organic Chemistry at the Ruhr University Bochum, and Dr. Jörg Matysik, Professor of Analytical Chemistry at the University of Leipzig, are part of a group of five German-speaking scientists who have been publicly raising questions about the quality and safety of the BioNTech vaccine (as it is known in Germany) for the last year and a half.
They recently appeared on the Punkt.Preradovic online program of the German journalist Milena Preradovic to discuss batch variability. Their starting point was the recent Danish study showing enormous variation in the adverse events associated with different batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or BNT162b2 per its scientific codename."
https://brownstone.org/articles/scientists-uncover-evidence-eu-pfizer-biontech-batches-included-placebos/
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
"The scientists, Dr. Gerald Dyker, Professor of Organic Chemistry at the Ruhr University Bochum, and Dr. Jörg Matysik, Professor of Analytical Chemistry at the University of Leipzig, are part of a group of five German-speaking scientists who have been publicly raising questions about the quality and safety of the BioNTech vaccine (as it is known in Germany) for the last year and a half.
They recently appeared on the Punkt.Preradovic online program of the German journalist Milena Preradovic to discuss batch variability. Their starting point was the recent Danish study showing enormous variation in the adverse events associated with different batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or BNT162b2 per its scientific codename."
https://brownstone.org/articles/scientists-uncover-evidence-eu-pfizer-biontech-batches-included-placebos/
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
Brownstone Institute
German Scientists Uncover Evidence that EU Pfizer-BioNTech Batches Included Placebos ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Scientists have uncovered evidence that batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine deployed in the EU may have consisted of placebos
👍46❤11🤯8🔥3
Covid Deaths in Pregnancy Rose 300 Percent During Delta. Blame The Toxic Combination of Covid Plus Vaccines.
"The campaign to vaccinate pregnant women in the heat of the second Covid wave may have combined to make infections worse in the vaccinated. The phenomenon, often minimized as “breakthrough infection,” is called vaccine-associated enhanced disease or VAED and has been documented in measles, respiratory syncytial virus, and dengue fever.
The 429 women who died from pregnancy-related Covid in 2021 are a tiny fraction of those who birthed 3.6 million babies in 2021. But their role in the nation’s 40 percent increase in maternal deaths deserves official scrutiny. When we looked at deaths of women for whom Covid was the prime killer—the underlying cause—we found an increase of 2,000 percent, from 16 mothers who died in 2020 to 335 in 2021.
Since the rollout of Covid vaccines in late 2020, a concerted effort has been made to minimize vaccine failures of efficacy and safety while overstating vaccine success. We contend that this awful chapter in Covid history, when more than 400 families lost wives and mothers, is instructive. It may also offer insight into vaccine-driven sickness and death in the general population that has been studiously ignored."
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/ask-why-429-moms-died-a305d67b
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
"The campaign to vaccinate pregnant women in the heat of the second Covid wave may have combined to make infections worse in the vaccinated. The phenomenon, often minimized as “breakthrough infection,” is called vaccine-associated enhanced disease or VAED and has been documented in measles, respiratory syncytial virus, and dengue fever.
The 429 women who died from pregnancy-related Covid in 2021 are a tiny fraction of those who birthed 3.6 million babies in 2021. But their role in the nation’s 40 percent increase in maternal deaths deserves official scrutiny. When we looked at deaths of women for whom Covid was the prime killer—the underlying cause—we found an increase of 2,000 percent, from 16 mothers who died in 2020 to 335 in 2021.
Since the rollout of Covid vaccines in late 2020, a concerted effort has been made to minimize vaccine failures of efficacy and safety while overstating vaccine success. We contend that this awful chapter in Covid history, when more than 400 families lost wives and mothers, is instructive. It may also offer insight into vaccine-driven sickness and death in the general population that has been studiously ignored."
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/ask-why-429-moms-died-a305d67b
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
Trialsitenews
Ask Why 429 Moms Died
Covid Deaths in Pregnancy Rose 300 Percent During Delta. Blame The Toxic Combination of Covid Plus Vaccines.
PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA AND MARY BETH PFEIFFER
PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA AND MARY BETH PFEIFFER
😢36👍17🤬15❤6🙏6💔1
⚗🦠 LAB LEAK SMOKING GUN: 🔫
"Excellent layperson explanation of the relevance of the BsmBI purchase proposed in DEFUSE by
@john_bumblebee, translated from Dutch:
I have to explain this because I don't think the interested layman realizes how incredibly important this find is. In fact, this is finding a gun with the fingerprints of the perpetrator in a murder. In October 2022, @tony_vandongen @VBruttel and @WashburneAlex published a preprint, in which they described a number of striking features of #SARSCoV2 . There were a number of cutting sites in the virus's genome that ensured that the virus could be cut into pieces making it possible to easily exchange them with another gene, as if it were a module. Moreover, these cutting sites were much more regularly distributed across the genome than in comparable viruses such as BANAL52 and RaTG13. This would fit well with a 'reverse genetics' system, which allows one to quickly and easily create an artificial virus. Because you could easily exchange each of those six pieces for another piece from a different virus. Including the part containing the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site. The latter is unique to SARSCoV2 and does not occur in any other sarbecovirus. They had the entire clan of the zoonati thrown at them, with the utmost nonsense, but the conclusions still stood. The entire makeup of SARSCoV2 could very well fit a 'reverse genetics system'. One point of criticism was why the trio focused on only two of those molecular scissors, while there are many more. This was due to the fact that Ralph Baric published an article in 2017 using those scissors, thus writing a manual, as it were, for this reverse genetics system. I wrote about this before in @AndereKrant.
https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuws/steeds-meer-bewijs-sars-cov-2-virus-kwam-uit-lab-2022-11-18
Now we go to DEFUSE, the application to the American defense organization DARPA by
@EcoHealthNYC. It was proposed to incorporate a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses. What now turns out? The DEFUSE application proposes to be able to cut artificial viruses into SIX parts. And which molecular scissors did they order for that? That's right: the two pairs of scissors that the trio of VanDongen, Bruttel and Washburne discussed. In other words, not only did DEFUSE propose building a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses, they also described exactly how they wanted to do this and using which molecular scissors. And exactly that method fits seamlessly with what SARSCoV2 looks like. This is the gun. With the fingerprints. Literally. Apparently something has happened, and Bruttel has shown something that was not yet intended to be published. Emily Kopp's account from the
@USRightToKnow has strangely disappeared. We'll see how this turns out. But this is 'pretty much case closed'."
https://twitter.com/john_bumblebee/status/1747928491478135049
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
"Excellent layperson explanation of the relevance of the BsmBI purchase proposed in DEFUSE by
@john_bumblebee, translated from Dutch:
I have to explain this because I don't think the interested layman realizes how incredibly important this find is. In fact, this is finding a gun with the fingerprints of the perpetrator in a murder. In October 2022, @tony_vandongen @VBruttel and @WashburneAlex published a preprint, in which they described a number of striking features of #SARSCoV2 . There were a number of cutting sites in the virus's genome that ensured that the virus could be cut into pieces making it possible to easily exchange them with another gene, as if it were a module. Moreover, these cutting sites were much more regularly distributed across the genome than in comparable viruses such as BANAL52 and RaTG13. This would fit well with a 'reverse genetics' system, which allows one to quickly and easily create an artificial virus. Because you could easily exchange each of those six pieces for another piece from a different virus. Including the part containing the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site. The latter is unique to SARSCoV2 and does not occur in any other sarbecovirus. They had the entire clan of the zoonati thrown at them, with the utmost nonsense, but the conclusions still stood. The entire makeup of SARSCoV2 could very well fit a 'reverse genetics system'. One point of criticism was why the trio focused on only two of those molecular scissors, while there are many more. This was due to the fact that Ralph Baric published an article in 2017 using those scissors, thus writing a manual, as it were, for this reverse genetics system. I wrote about this before in @AndereKrant.
https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuws/steeds-meer-bewijs-sars-cov-2-virus-kwam-uit-lab-2022-11-18
Now we go to DEFUSE, the application to the American defense organization DARPA by
@EcoHealthNYC. It was proposed to incorporate a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses. What now turns out? The DEFUSE application proposes to be able to cut artificial viruses into SIX parts. And which molecular scissors did they order for that? That's right: the two pairs of scissors that the trio of VanDongen, Bruttel and Washburne discussed. In other words, not only did DEFUSE propose building a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses, they also described exactly how they wanted to do this and using which molecular scissors. And exactly that method fits seamlessly with what SARSCoV2 looks like. This is the gun. With the fingerprints. Literally. Apparently something has happened, and Bruttel has shown something that was not yet intended to be published. Emily Kopp's account from the
@USRightToKnow has strangely disappeared. We'll see how this turns out. But this is 'pretty much case closed'."
https://twitter.com/john_bumblebee/status/1747928491478135049
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
De Andere Krant
De Andere Krant - Steeds meer bewijs: SARS-CoV-2-virus kwam uit lab: Van onze redactie, Jan Bonte
Van onze redactie, Jan Bonte: Dubieuze rol virologen Erasmus
👍37❤11🔥5😁1🤔1
✂️🦠 HOW SARSCoV2 WAS MADE:
"To construct synthetic variants of natural coronaviruses in the lab, researchers often use a method called in vitro genome assembly. This method utilizes special enzymes called restriction enzymes to generate DNA building blocks that then can be “stitched” together in the correct order of the viral genome. To make a virus in the lab, researchers usually engineer the viral genome to add and remove stitching sites, called restriction sites. The ways researchers modify these sites can serve as fingerprints of in vitro genome assembly.
We found that SARS-CoV has the restriction site fingerprint that is typical for synthetic viruses. The synthetic fingerprint of SARS-CoV-2 is anomalous in wild coronaviruses, and common in lab-assembled viruses. The type of mutations (synonymous or silent mutations) that differentiate the restriction sites in SARS-CoV-2 are characteristic of engineering, and the concentration of these silent mutations in the restriction sites is extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution. Both the restriction site fingerprint and the pattern of mutations generating them are extremely unlikely in wild coronaviruses and nearly universal in synthetic viruses. Our findings strongly suggest a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2."
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756v1
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
"To construct synthetic variants of natural coronaviruses in the lab, researchers often use a method called in vitro genome assembly. This method utilizes special enzymes called restriction enzymes to generate DNA building blocks that then can be “stitched” together in the correct order of the viral genome. To make a virus in the lab, researchers usually engineer the viral genome to add and remove stitching sites, called restriction sites. The ways researchers modify these sites can serve as fingerprints of in vitro genome assembly.
We found that SARS-CoV has the restriction site fingerprint that is typical for synthetic viruses. The synthetic fingerprint of SARS-CoV-2 is anomalous in wild coronaviruses, and common in lab-assembled viruses. The type of mutations (synonymous or silent mutations) that differentiate the restriction sites in SARS-CoV-2 are characteristic of engineering, and the concentration of these silent mutations in the restriction sites is extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution. Both the restriction site fingerprint and the pattern of mutations generating them are extremely unlikely in wild coronaviruses and nearly universal in synthetic viruses. Our findings strongly suggest a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2."
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756v1
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
🔥19👍11❤5😁1
🦠🦄"There are >800 commercially available restriction enzymes. Only one--BsmBI--is named in EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal (P<0.002)
There are >800 known sarbecoviruses. Only one--SARS-CoV-2--contains a furin cleavage site, as planned for insertion in EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal (P<0.002)
The probability of both of the above facts being the result of chance is the product of the two probabilities (P < 0.000004).
And there are additional lines of evidence indicating lab origin.
There is no basis for reasonable doubt."
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
There are >800 known sarbecoviruses. Only one--SARS-CoV-2--contains a furin cleavage site, as planned for insertion in EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal (P<0.002)
The probability of both of the above facts being the result of chance is the product of the two probabilities (P < 0.000004).
And there are additional lines of evidence indicating lab origin.
There is no basis for reasonable doubt."
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
👍30🔥11🤬4❤2
WHY NATURAL GAS IS THE CLEANEST ENERGY SOURCE:
Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural gas are carbon dioxide and water vapor, the same compounds we exhale when we breathe.
CO2 is not a pollutant. Its increase in the atmosphere has wrongly been scapegoated and accused of being created by man, whereas the vast majority is being released by the Oceans, which are the planet's carbon sink. The Oceans release or absord CO2 relative to the atmosphere with a time lag delay of centuries if not a millennium after these warming & cooling cycles take place on land.
CO2 has also been wrongly accused of being the main greenhouse gas of the planet, whereas 95% of the planet's greenhouse gas is water vapour.
It has then been scapegoated and accused of being the most efficient greenhouse gas, whereas again that property belongs to water.
It has then wrongly been accused and scapegoated for increasing the planet's temperature, whereas what does that is changing Earth-Sun distance due to orbital solar cycles combined with cyclical variations of water vapour in the form of the varying Earth's cloud cover.
A recent increase in highest summer temperatures in some latitudes has been wrongly attributed to increasing CO2, whereas it is largely due to a 10-20% increase in greenhouse water vapour in the stratosphere due to the explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai underwater volcano in the South Pacific in 2022, which sent unprecedented amounts of water vapour from the ocean into the stratosphere.
Once you accept that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is a big lie from the oligarchy which funds scientific research designed to increase taxation by governments on the lower and middle classes, then you can see why it is essential to push back against this lie based taxation to push the lower classes out of the brink of starvation.
I have no objection to other forms of energy, as long as we recognise that because CO2 is not a pollutant, but a fertiliser, all plant, tree, and plankton life love it, we can all accept that natural gas is not only the cleanest form of energy, but the most beneficial to all life on planet Earth. I love CO2 and so should you.
Natural gas is also not a "fossil fuel" neither is it a limited availability scarce resource. Natural gas is a form of renewable energy. It is formed deep into the Earth's mantle in geothermal reactions with the outer core. This is called an abiotic process of renewal, which means more gas is always created as we extract and burn the existing one, as it comes from the earth's own and continuous geothermal reactions.
If you want to read more, linked below is a scientific paper on the abiotic sources of energy.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
Robin Monotti
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural gas are carbon dioxide and water vapor, the same compounds we exhale when we breathe.
CO2 is not a pollutant. Its increase in the atmosphere has wrongly been scapegoated and accused of being created by man, whereas the vast majority is being released by the Oceans, which are the planet's carbon sink. The Oceans release or absord CO2 relative to the atmosphere with a time lag delay of centuries if not a millennium after these warming & cooling cycles take place on land.
CO2 has also been wrongly accused of being the main greenhouse gas of the planet, whereas 95% of the planet's greenhouse gas is water vapour.
It has then been scapegoated and accused of being the most efficient greenhouse gas, whereas again that property belongs to water.
It has then wrongly been accused and scapegoated for increasing the planet's temperature, whereas what does that is changing Earth-Sun distance due to orbital solar cycles combined with cyclical variations of water vapour in the form of the varying Earth's cloud cover.
A recent increase in highest summer temperatures in some latitudes has been wrongly attributed to increasing CO2, whereas it is largely due to a 10-20% increase in greenhouse water vapour in the stratosphere due to the explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai underwater volcano in the South Pacific in 2022, which sent unprecedented amounts of water vapour from the ocean into the stratosphere.
Once you accept that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is a big lie from the oligarchy which funds scientific research designed to increase taxation by governments on the lower and middle classes, then you can see why it is essential to push back against this lie based taxation to push the lower classes out of the brink of starvation.
I have no objection to other forms of energy, as long as we recognise that because CO2 is not a pollutant, but a fertiliser, all plant, tree, and plankton life love it, we can all accept that natural gas is not only the cleanest form of energy, but the most beneficial to all life on planet Earth. I love CO2 and so should you.
Natural gas is also not a "fossil fuel" neither is it a limited availability scarce resource. Natural gas is a form of renewable energy. It is formed deep into the Earth's mantle in geothermal reactions with the outer core. This is called an abiotic process of renewal, which means more gas is always created as we extract and burn the existing one, as it comes from the earth's own and continuous geothermal reactions.
If you want to read more, linked below is a scientific paper on the abiotic sources of energy.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
Robin Monotti
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
❤67👍47💯23🔥4
🦠✂️ Misguided people who deny either the existence of viruses, the existence of SARSCoV2 & its "variants"; the existence and success of gain of function research experiments on viruses, may do well to listen rather than attack (for once):
In light of the new FOIA documents (yesterday), biologist Alex Washburne has been essentially vindicated in his lab leak paper — which generated tremendous controversy last year. Here he speaks to Jay Bhattacharya:
https://x.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1748489807695900809
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
In light of the new FOIA documents (yesterday), biologist Alex Washburne has been essentially vindicated in his lab leak paper — which generated tremendous controversy last year. Here he speaks to Jay Bhattacharya:
https://x.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1748489807695900809
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
👍40❤6🤨3😁2
Forwarded from Russia Direct
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
President Putin: By abandoning neutrality, Ukraine essentially violated the basis for its independence.
Footnote: According to Section IX of Ukraine’s 1990 Declaration of State Sovereignty, “the Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocs…”
🔗 Full transcript
Subscribe to @PutinDirect
Follow on: X | FB | IG | TikTok
Footnote: According to Section IX of Ukraine’s 1990 Declaration of State Sovereignty, “the Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocs…”
🔗 Full transcript
Subscribe to @PutinDirect
Follow on: X | FB | IG | TikTok
👍58💯14👏12🔥2🤬2❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why does Starmer not want to condemn Israel but is so keen to condemn Russia instead?
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
🤬59👍26👀12😁4👏2❤1🤓1
Not only was a pandemic real, but it was VIRUS+VACCINE that killed people, what we call VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE and it wasn't only the frail & elderly but PREGNANT WOMEN too. This article was refused by all corporate media. Only TrialSite published it. WHY?
Link to article:
t.me/robinmg/33703
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
Link to article:
t.me/robinmg/33703
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
💯32😢11👍5❤4🤔1💔1
VIRUS+VACCINE in close proximity kills CHILDREN too. Not only the elderly, or pregnant women (see post above).
That is why it is irresponsible to deny SARSCoV2 and its "variants" or that there was a pandemic, meaning an epidemic across multiple regions of the planet.
Because when mixed with VACCINES the VIRUS can become lethal. This is called VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE or VACCINE ASSOCIATED ENHANCED DISEASE and I have been talking about it on this channel since 2020.
Chart credit: FABIAN SPIEKER
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
That is why it is irresponsible to deny SARSCoV2 and its "variants" or that there was a pandemic, meaning an epidemic across multiple regions of the planet.
Because when mixed with VACCINES the VIRUS can become lethal. This is called VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE or VACCINE ASSOCIATED ENHANCED DISEASE and I have been talking about it on this channel since 2020.
Chart credit: FABIAN SPIEKER
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
👍35🙏13❤2🤔2