WHY NATURAL GAS IS THE CLEANEST ENERGY SOURCE:
Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural gas are carbon dioxide and water vapor, the same compounds we exhale when we breathe.
CO2 is not a pollutant. Its increase in the atmosphere has wrongly been scapegoated and accused of being created by man, whereas the vast majority is being released by the Oceans, which are the planet's carbon sink. The Oceans release or absord CO2 relative to the atmosphere with a time lag delay of centuries if not a millennium after these warming & cooling cycles take place on land.
CO2 has also been wrongly accused of being the main greenhouse gas of the planet, whereas 95% of the planet's greenhouse gas is water vapour.
It has then been scapegoated and accused of being the most efficient greenhouse gas, whereas again that property belongs to water.
It has then wrongly been accused and scapegoated for increasing the planet's temperature, whereas what does that is changing Earth-Sun distance due to orbital solar cycles combined with cyclical variations of water vapour in the form of the varying Earth's cloud cover.
A recent increase in highest summer temperatures in some latitudes has been wrongly attributed to increasing CO2, whereas it is largely due to a 10-20% increase in greenhouse water vapour in the stratosphere due to the explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai underwater volcano in the South Pacific in 2022, which sent unprecedented amounts of water vapour from the ocean into the stratosphere.
Once you accept that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is a big lie from the oligarchy which funds scientific research designed to increase taxation by governments on the lower and middle classes, then you can see why it is essential to push back against this lie based taxation to push the lower classes out of the brink of starvation.
I have no objection to other forms of energy, as long as we recognise that because CO2 is not a pollutant, but a fertiliser, all plant, tree, and plankton life love it, we can all accept that natural gas is not only the cleanest form of energy, but the most beneficial to all life on planet Earth. I love CO2 and so should you.
Natural gas is also not a "fossil fuel" neither is it a limited availability scarce resource. Natural gas is a form of renewable energy. It is formed deep into the Earth's mantle in geothermal reactions with the outer core. This is called an abiotic process of renewal, which means more gas is always created as we extract and burn the existing one, as it comes from the earth's own and continuous geothermal reactions.
If you want to read more, linked below is a scientific paper on the abiotic sources of energy.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
Robin Monotti
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
Composed primarily of methane, the main products of the combustion of natural gas are carbon dioxide and water vapor, the same compounds we exhale when we breathe.
CO2 is not a pollutant. Its increase in the atmosphere has wrongly been scapegoated and accused of being created by man, whereas the vast majority is being released by the Oceans, which are the planet's carbon sink. The Oceans release or absord CO2 relative to the atmosphere with a time lag delay of centuries if not a millennium after these warming & cooling cycles take place on land.
CO2 has also been wrongly accused of being the main greenhouse gas of the planet, whereas 95% of the planet's greenhouse gas is water vapour.
It has then been scapegoated and accused of being the most efficient greenhouse gas, whereas again that property belongs to water.
It has then wrongly been accused and scapegoated for increasing the planet's temperature, whereas what does that is changing Earth-Sun distance due to orbital solar cycles combined with cyclical variations of water vapour in the form of the varying Earth's cloud cover.
A recent increase in highest summer temperatures in some latitudes has been wrongly attributed to increasing CO2, whereas it is largely due to a 10-20% increase in greenhouse water vapour in the stratosphere due to the explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai underwater volcano in the South Pacific in 2022, which sent unprecedented amounts of water vapour from the ocean into the stratosphere.
Once you accept that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is a big lie from the oligarchy which funds scientific research designed to increase taxation by governments on the lower and middle classes, then you can see why it is essential to push back against this lie based taxation to push the lower classes out of the brink of starvation.
I have no objection to other forms of energy, as long as we recognise that because CO2 is not a pollutant, but a fertiliser, all plant, tree, and plankton life love it, we can all accept that natural gas is not only the cleanest form of energy, but the most beneficial to all life on planet Earth. I love CO2 and so should you.
Natural gas is also not a "fossil fuel" neither is it a limited availability scarce resource. Natural gas is a form of renewable energy. It is formed deep into the Earth's mantle in geothermal reactions with the outer core. This is called an abiotic process of renewal, which means more gas is always created as we extract and burn the existing one, as it comes from the earth's own and continuous geothermal reactions.
If you want to read more, linked below is a scientific paper on the abiotic sources of energy.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
Robin Monotti
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
โค67๐47๐ฏ23๐ฅ4
๐ฆ โ๏ธ Misguided people who deny either the existence of viruses, the existence of SARSCoV2 & its "variants"; the existence and success of gain of function research experiments on viruses, may do well to listen rather than attack (for once):
In light of the new FOIA documents (yesterday), biologist Alex Washburne has been essentially vindicated in his lab leak paper โ which generated tremendous controversy last year. Here he speaks to Jay Bhattacharya:
https://x.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1748489807695900809
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
In light of the new FOIA documents (yesterday), biologist Alex Washburne has been essentially vindicated in his lab leak paper โ which generated tremendous controversy last year. Here he speaks to Jay Bhattacharya:
https://x.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1748489807695900809
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
๐40โค6๐คจ3๐2
Forwarded from Russia Direct
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
President Putin: By abandoning neutrality, Ukraine essentially violated the basis for its independence.
Footnote: According to Section IX of Ukraineโs 1990 Declaration of State Sovereignty, โthe Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocsโฆโ
๐ Full transcript
Subscribe to @PutinDirect
Follow on: X | FB | IG | TikTok
Footnote: According to Section IX of Ukraineโs 1990 Declaration of State Sovereignty, โthe Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocsโฆโ
๐ Full transcript
Subscribe to @PutinDirect
Follow on: X | FB | IG | TikTok
๐58๐ฏ14๐12๐ฅ2๐คฌ2โค1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why does Starmer not want to condemn Israel but is so keen to condemn Russia instead?
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
๐คฌ59๐26๐12๐4๐2โค1๐ค1
Not only was a pandemic real, but it was VIRUS+VACCINE that killed people, what we call VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE and it wasn't only the frail & elderly but PREGNANT WOMEN too. This article was refused by all corporate media. Only TrialSite published it. WHY?
Link to article:
t.me/robinmg/33703
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
Link to article:
t.me/robinmg/33703
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
๐ฏ32๐ข11๐5โค4๐ค1๐1
VIRUS+VACCINE in close proximity kills CHILDREN too. Not only the elderly, or pregnant women (see post above).
That is why it is irresponsible to deny SARSCoV2 and its "variants" or that there was a pandemic, meaning an epidemic across multiple regions of the planet.
Because when mixed with VACCINES the VIRUS can become lethal. This is called VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE or VACCINE ASSOCIATED ENHANCED DISEASE and I have been talking about it on this channel since 2020.
Chart credit: FABIAN SPIEKER
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
That is why it is irresponsible to deny SARSCoV2 and its "variants" or that there was a pandemic, meaning an epidemic across multiple regions of the planet.
Because when mixed with VACCINES the VIRUS can become lethal. This is called VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE or VACCINE ASSOCIATED ENHANCED DISEASE and I have been talking about it on this channel since 2020.
Chart credit: FABIAN SPIEKER
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
๐35๐13โค2๐ค2
OIL AND GAS ARE NOT "FOSSIL FUELS" THEY ARE A RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE CREATED BY A GEOTHERMAL REACTION BETWEEN THE SOLID & LIQUID MANTLE:
'Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons and Oil and Gas Deposits Formation'
"The theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons recognizes that the petroleum is a primordial material of deep origin [Kutcherov, Krayushkin 2010]. This theory explains that hydrocarbon compounds generate in the asthenosphere of the Earth & migrate through the deep faults into the crust of the Earth. There they form oil & gas deposits in any kind of rock in any kind of the structural position (Fig. 1). Thus the accumulation of oil & gas is considered as a part of the natural process of the Earthโs outgrassing, responsible for creation of its hydrosphere, atmosphere & biosphere. Until recently the obstacle to accept the theory of the abyssal abiogenic origin of hydrocarbons was the lack of the reliable & reproducible experimental results confirming the possibility of the synthesis of complex hydrocarbon systems under the conditions of the asthenosphere of planet earth."
Link to scientific article in post below:
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
'Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons and Oil and Gas Deposits Formation'
"The theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons recognizes that the petroleum is a primordial material of deep origin [Kutcherov, Krayushkin 2010]. This theory explains that hydrocarbon compounds generate in the asthenosphere of the Earth & migrate through the deep faults into the crust of the Earth. There they form oil & gas deposits in any kind of rock in any kind of the structural position (Fig. 1). Thus the accumulation of oil & gas is considered as a part of the natural process of the Earthโs outgrassing, responsible for creation of its hydrosphere, atmosphere & biosphere. Until recently the obstacle to accept the theory of the abyssal abiogenic origin of hydrocarbons was the lack of the reliable & reproducible experimental results confirming the possibility of the synthesis of complex hydrocarbon systems under the conditions of the asthenosphere of planet earth."
Link to scientific article in post below:
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
IntechOpen
Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons and Oil and Gas Deposits Formation | IntechOpen
Open access peer-reviewed chapter
โค39๐34๐ฏ10๐ฅ4๐1๐ค1๐คฌ1
Forwarded from Consent Of The People
Measles outbreak?
Should you be concerned?
Informed Consent Matters : https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/copy-of-pandemic-2
Should you be concerned?
Informed Consent Matters : https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/copy-of-pandemic-2
๐40โค2๐1
Forwarded from Consent Of The People
Measles outbreak?
Should you be concerned?
Informed Consent Matters : https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/copy-of-pandemic-2
"Since the summer of 2023, news headlines across the UK and globe have been warning of an imminent measles outbreak amongst certain populations.
Predicting that this outbreak could affect tens of thousands of people, and blaming it on waning measles (MMR) vaccination rates, health authorities are cautioning of the possibility of a serious epidemic.
At the time of writing (mid-January 2024), such news headlines are becoming more prominent and widespread.
Are authorities right to be concerned? Would a measles outbreak really pose a grave threat to the nation's health?
It's true that there was a time, historically, when poor sanitation and overcrowding were rife, that measles was associated with more debilitating effects, including death. However, these trends were reversed by improvements in nutrition, sanitation, and plumbing.
By the time the measles vaccination was introduced in the UK in 1968, deaths from measles had already declined to extremely low levels..
Although advocates of vaccination often credit the measles vaccine with eliminating deaths from measles, this is not an accurate picture, as evidence shows that modern plumbing and sanitation, plus improvements in diet, had a far more profound impact on reducing severe effects associated with measles than did the measles vaccination...
Although measles has, in recent years, developed a reputation as a serious, even killer, disease, this is a fairly modern "rebranding". Prior to the measles vaccination being made available in the 1960s, measles was considered a routine childhood infection, which almost all children passed through with no lasting effects.
Indeed, when the then 12-year-old Prince Charles, heir to British the throne, contracted measles in 1960, it was casually reported in the newspapers that "the rash appeared Tuesday and is expected to run its usual course. No further bulletins are expected".
There was certainly no concern the young prince might die - and most families experienced measles the same way: a rash and a fever, which quickly ran their course with no lasting effects.
Even modern sources confirm that measles "usually passes in about seven to 10 days without causing any further problems".
So why does the word 'measles' strike fear into the hearts of parents and policy-makers alike?"
Informed Consent Matters
Should you be concerned?
Informed Consent Matters : https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/copy-of-pandemic-2
"Since the summer of 2023, news headlines across the UK and globe have been warning of an imminent measles outbreak amongst certain populations.
Predicting that this outbreak could affect tens of thousands of people, and blaming it on waning measles (MMR) vaccination rates, health authorities are cautioning of the possibility of a serious epidemic.
At the time of writing (mid-January 2024), such news headlines are becoming more prominent and widespread.
Are authorities right to be concerned? Would a measles outbreak really pose a grave threat to the nation's health?
It's true that there was a time, historically, when poor sanitation and overcrowding were rife, that measles was associated with more debilitating effects, including death. However, these trends were reversed by improvements in nutrition, sanitation, and plumbing.
By the time the measles vaccination was introduced in the UK in 1968, deaths from measles had already declined to extremely low levels..
Although advocates of vaccination often credit the measles vaccine with eliminating deaths from measles, this is not an accurate picture, as evidence shows that modern plumbing and sanitation, plus improvements in diet, had a far more profound impact on reducing severe effects associated with measles than did the measles vaccination...
Although measles has, in recent years, developed a reputation as a serious, even killer, disease, this is a fairly modern "rebranding". Prior to the measles vaccination being made available in the 1960s, measles was considered a routine childhood infection, which almost all children passed through with no lasting effects.
Indeed, when the then 12-year-old Prince Charles, heir to British the throne, contracted measles in 1960, it was casually reported in the newspapers that "the rash appeared Tuesday and is expected to run its usual course. No further bulletins are expected".
There was certainly no concern the young prince might die - and most families experienced measles the same way: a rash and a fever, which quickly ran their course with no lasting effects.
Even modern sources confirm that measles "usually passes in about seven to 10 days without causing any further problems".
So why does the word 'measles' strike fear into the hearts of parents and policy-makers alike?"
Informed Consent Matters
๐69โค23๐ฅ6๐3
You don't eliminate the fear of measles by telling people it doesn't exist, you only look like a fool if you do that. Or by telling them that they will die if they are not vaccinated, that's irrational fearmongering. You eliminate the fear by telling people the chances of dying from it are almost negligible, that it simply runs its course to healing naturally, and that they can reduce measles associated pneumoniaโspecific mortality in children aged less than two years by simply treating it with vitamin A.
Now apply the same logic to Covid19 but swap vitamin A for vitamin D, zinc, & a course of antibiotics.
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
Now apply the same logic to Covid19 but swap vitamin A for vitamin D, zinc, & a course of antibiotics.
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
๐73โค18๐ฅ2
THE BOOK OF VISION & GEORGE ERNST STAHL
As someone asked this question, yes, the real life doctor THE BOOK OF VISION film is based on was a real student and practitioner of GEORGE ERNST STAHL's (1659-134) approach to healing and medicine. His first book was in fact titled STAHL-IAN PRACTICE, or Mr. George Ernst Stahlโs Collegium practicalum.
Stahl professed an animistic system, in opposition to the materialism of Hermann Boerhaave and Friedrich Hoffmann. His main argument on living things was that there is an agent responsible for delaying this decomposition of living things and that agent is the anima or soul of the living organism. The anima controls all of the physical processes that happen in the body. It not only just controls the mechanical aspects of it but the direction and goals of them too. How the anima controls these processes is through motion. He believed that the three important motions of the body are the circulation of blood, excretion and secretion.
These beliefs were reflected in his views on medicine. He thought that medicine should deal with the body as a whole and its anima, rather than the specific parts of a body. Having knowledge on the specific mechanical parts of the body is not very useful. His views had been criticized by Gottfried Leibniz, with whom he exchanged letters, later published in a book titled Negotium otiosum seu ฯฮบฮนฮฑฮผฮฑฯฮฏฮฑ (1720).Also, during the first part of the 18th century, Stahl's ideas on the non-physical part of the body were disregarded while his mechanistic ideas on the body were accepted in the works of Boerhaave and Hoffmann...
So we brought Stahl's ideas back from the dead in THE BOOK OF VISION film:
The Book of Vision film (2020-UK 2023)
Executive Producer Terrence Malick
Director Carlo Hintermann
With Charles Dance, Lotte Verbeek, Sverrir Gudnason, Isolda Dychauk
UK & Ireland Link:
https://www.parklandentertainment.com/movie/the-book-of-vision?whereToWatch=watch-at-home
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
As someone asked this question, yes, the real life doctor THE BOOK OF VISION film is based on was a real student and practitioner of GEORGE ERNST STAHL's (1659-134) approach to healing and medicine. His first book was in fact titled STAHL-IAN PRACTICE, or Mr. George Ernst Stahlโs Collegium practicalum.
Stahl professed an animistic system, in opposition to the materialism of Hermann Boerhaave and Friedrich Hoffmann. His main argument on living things was that there is an agent responsible for delaying this decomposition of living things and that agent is the anima or soul of the living organism. The anima controls all of the physical processes that happen in the body. It not only just controls the mechanical aspects of it but the direction and goals of them too. How the anima controls these processes is through motion. He believed that the three important motions of the body are the circulation of blood, excretion and secretion.
These beliefs were reflected in his views on medicine. He thought that medicine should deal with the body as a whole and its anima, rather than the specific parts of a body. Having knowledge on the specific mechanical parts of the body is not very useful. His views had been criticized by Gottfried Leibniz, with whom he exchanged letters, later published in a book titled Negotium otiosum seu ฯฮบฮนฮฑฮผฮฑฯฮฏฮฑ (1720).Also, during the first part of the 18th century, Stahl's ideas on the non-physical part of the body were disregarded while his mechanistic ideas on the body were accepted in the works of Boerhaave and Hoffmann...
So we brought Stahl's ideas back from the dead in THE BOOK OF VISION film:
The Book of Vision film (2020-UK 2023)
Executive Producer Terrence Malick
Director Carlo Hintermann
With Charles Dance, Lotte Verbeek, Sverrir Gudnason, Isolda Dychauk
UK & Ireland Link:
https://www.parklandentertainment.com/movie/the-book-of-vision?whereToWatch=watch-at-home
โก๏ธ Boost RobinMG ๐
๐59โค32๐5๐ฅ3๐ค2๐คช2๐ฅฐ1๐ฑ1