Robin Monotti
“You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena." - GLADIO (NATO) Declassified files expose British role in NATO’s false flag Gladio terror armies Newly declassified British files shed disturbing…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena." Vincenzo Vinciguerra.
Operation Gladio - NATO False Flag Terrorism: BBC Timewatch [1992] Full Documentary
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1hJrQisPVk8&feature=youtu.be
ROBINMG 🚀
Operation Gladio - NATO False Flag Terrorism: BBC Timewatch [1992] Full Documentary
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1hJrQisPVk8&feature=youtu.be
ROBINMG 🚀
💯42🔥14👍10❤2🤬1
75 Years of NATO = 75 Years of Denial
"NATO’s self-image as a community for defense in adherence to international law simply does not match reality. We must rather draw the opposite conclusion.
NATO is a community of illegality and of the violators of international law who, either separately or as an organization, conduct wars of aggression on a politically opportunistic basis.
NATO itself, as we now know, put into motion Operation Gladio, a clandestine organization to be activated whenever democratic majorities threatened to vote against NATO membership.
And with its unconditional support for the far-right government of Benjamin Netanyahu, NATO is losing all moral legitimacy in the Global South, as it is seen to be complicit in Israeli war crimes.
NATO’s myths are losing their luster.
Ultimately, the fight against NATO is a fight for one’s own sovereignty. As an alliance of client states, Europe is in danger of collapsing.
Emancipation as seen in Latin America’s has yet to materialize.
A first step would be to stop letting ourselves be played for fools by a military alliance that funds its aggressive strategy with a social war waged by its constitutive governments against its own population."
Sevim Dagdelen
https://consortiumnews.com/2024/07/09/75-years-of-nato-75-years-of-denial/
ROBINMG 🚀
"NATO’s self-image as a community for defense in adherence to international law simply does not match reality. We must rather draw the opposite conclusion.
NATO is a community of illegality and of the violators of international law who, either separately or as an organization, conduct wars of aggression on a politically opportunistic basis.
NATO itself, as we now know, put into motion Operation Gladio, a clandestine organization to be activated whenever democratic majorities threatened to vote against NATO membership.
And with its unconditional support for the far-right government of Benjamin Netanyahu, NATO is losing all moral legitimacy in the Global South, as it is seen to be complicit in Israeli war crimes.
NATO’s myths are losing their luster.
Ultimately, the fight against NATO is a fight for one’s own sovereignty. As an alliance of client states, Europe is in danger of collapsing.
Emancipation as seen in Latin America’s has yet to materialize.
A first step would be to stop letting ourselves be played for fools by a military alliance that funds its aggressive strategy with a social war waged by its constitutive governments against its own population."
Sevim Dagdelen
https://consortiumnews.com/2024/07/09/75-years-of-nato-75-years-of-denial/
ROBINMG 🚀
Consortium News
75 Years of NATO = 75 Years of Denial
German parliamentarian Sevim Dagdelen says for NATO, denial of its true nature is part of the essence of the organization.
By Sevim Dagdelen
World BEYOND War
The following is an abridged version of speech that Dagdelen, a member of the German Bundestag…
By Sevim Dagdelen
World BEYOND War
The following is an abridged version of speech that Dagdelen, a member of the German Bundestag…
🔥60👍27👏9❤3🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Scottish COVID inquiry | 28 June 2024
Shelagh McCall KC-Bereaved Relatives Skye
'The approach to LOCKDOWN a CALLOUS DISREGARD on the right to family life'
Misuse of DNR & CPR:
◾️Article 2 engaged and of 'GRAVE CONCERN'
Neglect:
◾️Article 3 engaged prohibition on torture
ROBINMG 🚀
Shelagh McCall KC-Bereaved Relatives Skye
'The approach to LOCKDOWN a CALLOUS DISREGARD on the right to family life'
Misuse of DNR & CPR:
◾️Article 2 engaged and of 'GRAVE CONCERN'
Neglect:
◾️Article 3 engaged prohibition on torture
ROBINMG 🚀
👍55❤19
If you like eclectic music and need your spirits lifted: our musical sister channel: @LOVEnotfearmankind
❤15
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How to deal with BBC propagandists trying to provoke you: get up and leave!
Well done Novak Djokovic!
ROBINMG 🚀
Well done Novak Djokovic!
ROBINMG 🚀
👍251👏102❤55🏆8😁6
MIT STUDY: REDUCING CAR SPEED TO 20MPH / 30KMH INCREASES ALL POLLUTION:
'According to a MIT study in Milan, the 30 km / h limit causes more pollution'
'The heat engines are designed to have the best efficiency around 70-80 km / h and travel times are also longer'
"The reduction of speed limit at 30 km / h - a measure that aims to make cities more livable, safe and less noisy - causes not only a slight increase in travel times but it also has polluting emissions. This is what one detects study of the MIT Senseable City Lab, of the famous Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, focused on the city of Milan and presented on the occasion of third forum of The urban mobility council, the mobility think tank promoted by the Unipol Group.
The speed reduction to 30 km / h determines a increase in carbon monoxide emissions (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) e particulate (PM), especially in the busiest hours of the day, because, explains the study, thermal engines are designed to have the best consumption efficiency around 70-80 km / h. In case of application of the 30km / h limit in the entire territory of the Municipality of Milan, CO2 emissions would increase by 1.5%, while those of PM, particularly harmful to human health, 2.7%."
http://rainews.it/articoli/2024/07/secondo-uno-studio-del-mit-a-milano-il-limite-dei-30-kmh-provoca-piu-inquinamento-d9eb5ab5-8b25-4155-bdad-09441840184f.h
ROBINMG 🚀
'According to a MIT study in Milan, the 30 km / h limit causes more pollution'
'The heat engines are designed to have the best efficiency around 70-80 km / h and travel times are also longer'
"The reduction of speed limit at 30 km / h - a measure that aims to make cities more livable, safe and less noisy - causes not only a slight increase in travel times but it also has polluting emissions. This is what one detects study of the MIT Senseable City Lab, of the famous Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, focused on the city of Milan and presented on the occasion of third forum of The urban mobility council, the mobility think tank promoted by the Unipol Group.
The speed reduction to 30 km / h determines a increase in carbon monoxide emissions (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) e particulate (PM), especially in the busiest hours of the day, because, explains the study, thermal engines are designed to have the best consumption efficiency around 70-80 km / h. In case of application of the 30km / h limit in the entire territory of the Municipality of Milan, CO2 emissions would increase by 1.5%, while those of PM, particularly harmful to human health, 2.7%."
http://rainews.it/articoli/2024/07/secondo-uno-studio-del-mit-a-milano-il-limite-dei-30-kmh-provoca-piu-inquinamento-d9eb5ab5-8b25-4155-bdad-09441840184f.h
ROBINMG 🚀
👍59😁15🔥8❤6
Robin Monotti
“You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena." - GLADIO (NATO) Declassified files expose British role in NATO’s false flag Gladio terror armies Newly declassified British files shed disturbing…
NATO FALSE FLAGS IN COLD WAR KILLED THOUSANDS. IMAGINE IN HOT WARS!
We have to assume that if an atrocity "by our official enemy" reaches our corporate media, there is 99% chance it was a NATO false flag.
NATO is a civilian terror false flag organisation.
ROBINMG 🚀
We have to assume that if an atrocity "by our official enemy" reaches our corporate media, there is 99% chance it was a NATO false flag.
NATO is a civilian terror false flag organisation.
ROBINMG 🚀
👍45💯35❤1🤔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Don't take the vaccine. You'll end up like this in old age. IF you are lucky enough to get to old age after taking the vaccine that is..
ROBINMG 🚀
ROBINMG 🚀
🔥54👍34😁16🤯5🤔4❤1🤬1
If you oppose the WHO but do not oppose NATO you have not understood the hierarchy between the two organisations.
ROBINMG 🚀
ROBINMG 🚀
👍94💯71❤🔥6🥰1
Expecting the WHO to stop pandemics instead of starting them is the same as expecting NATO to stop wars instead of being the ones starting all of them...
ROBINMG 🚀
ROBINMG 🚀
💯172🔥8
Robin Monotti
“You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena." Vincenzo Vinciguerra. Operation Gladio - NATO False Flag Terrorism: BBC Timewatch [1992] Full Documentary https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1hJrQisPV…
We have to assume that if an atrocity "by our official enemy" reaches our corporate media, there is 99% chance it was a NATO false flag. NATO is a civilian terror false flag organisation.
ROBINMG 🚀
ROBINMG 🚀
Telegram
Robin Monotti
Boost this channel to help it unlock additional features.
👍47💯27🤔2❤1🔥1
ROCKEFELLERS & THE IPCC:
"The Rockefeller Brothers Fund under the leadership of David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger founded the United Nations Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). and funded it with near unlimited resources going forward.
In the appendices of Norgangard’s book, he lists all the institutions founded by the family. Skimming them, I found myself jumping out of my desk chair and shouting into the void. The dog vanished, the cat hid. It is infuriating – they used their power to corrupt every institution that would serve their end game. Here is one page.
In the climate change arena, the Rockefellers call the shots. The whole thing was their idea, they took a silly but interesting theory and amped it up with hundreds and hundreds of million of dollars. They founded institutions and linked the survival of those institutions to promoting climate change and population reduction. They adopted one likely politician after another.
By 1998, the Rockefeller family had swept the table clean of any opposition to this one idea. Any scientist not on board with the agenda was imperiled. Any university department not working towards this one artificial goal, was in danger of being marginalized. Infiltration had begun into every media organization, every entertainment division of every major corporation. This, as stated below, would be a generational goal. For everyone. Or get off the bus."
https://www.technocracy.news/the-rockefellers-created-990-climate-change-institutions-foundations-and-activist-groups/
ROBINMG 🚀
"The Rockefeller Brothers Fund under the leadership of David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger founded the United Nations Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). and funded it with near unlimited resources going forward.
In the appendices of Norgangard’s book, he lists all the institutions founded by the family. Skimming them, I found myself jumping out of my desk chair and shouting into the void. The dog vanished, the cat hid. It is infuriating – they used their power to corrupt every institution that would serve their end game. Here is one page.
In the climate change arena, the Rockefellers call the shots. The whole thing was their idea, they took a silly but interesting theory and amped it up with hundreds and hundreds of million of dollars. They founded institutions and linked the survival of those institutions to promoting climate change and population reduction. They adopted one likely politician after another.
By 1998, the Rockefeller family had swept the table clean of any opposition to this one idea. Any scientist not on board with the agenda was imperiled. Any university department not working towards this one artificial goal, was in danger of being marginalized. Infiltration had begun into every media organization, every entertainment division of every major corporation. This, as stated below, would be a generational goal. For everyone. Or get off the bus."
https://www.technocracy.news/the-rockefellers-created-990-climate-change-institutions-foundations-and-activist-groups/
ROBINMG 🚀
🤬72👍12❤8
THE HOPE ACCORD
ON 3 JULY 2024, THE HOPE ACCORD WAS AGREED; CALLING FOR:
1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS.
2. A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS.
3. THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED.
4. THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA.
5. ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT.
“By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned”.
CO-SIGNED BY
1028 MEDICAL DOCTORS
2703 OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
1063 SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
28471 CONCERNED CITIZENS
Please sign the Accord here: https://thehopeaccord.org/
ROBINMG 🚀
ON 3 JULY 2024, THE HOPE ACCORD WAS AGREED; CALLING FOR:
1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS.
2. A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS.
3. THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED.
4. THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA.
5. ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT.
“By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned”.
CO-SIGNED BY
1028 MEDICAL DOCTORS
2703 OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
1063 SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
28471 CONCERNED CITIZENS
Please sign the Accord here: https://thehopeaccord.org/
ROBINMG 🚀
The Hope Accord
Please Sign Now!
❤68👍20🔥4🤔1👌1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mick Jagger & The Rolling Stones live in a globalist bubble. The Canadian crowd tries to wake Mick up. He steers it to football, shocked that the people hate their WEF puppet.
ROBINMG 🚀
ROBINMG 🚀
😁91🤬32👍17🔥4🤪3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬83🤪25🤯7😐5👍3😡3🔥2❤1😢1
Normies will not wake up according to what information we provide them, they will only wake up when their psychosocial journey is ready for it. Some, who benefit and are fed from the crumbs of the oligarchy, will never be ready. Others, may be on the verge of waking up. All we can do is speak the truth, when others are ready to listen or not remains entirely up to them. We can't force on other people's journey to miss the stops they need to get there. We are here if they decide to wake up.
ROBINMG 🚀
ROBINMG 🚀
Telegram
Robin Monotti
Boost this channel to help it unlock additional features.
👍78💯23❤2
Forwarded from 🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
❗The United States promised Yeltsin not to expand NATO without consulting Russia.
This became known from a declassified archival document published on the website of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.
"Yeltsin and his foreign minister in 1997, Yevgeny Primakov, provided the Americans neither the “grudging endorsement” of NATO expansion that the U.S. hoped for nor even the “acquiescence” that subsequent American memoirs claimed. Rather, as Yeltsin told Clinton personally at Helsinki in March 1997: “Our position has not changed. It remains a mistake for NATO to move eastward. But I need to take steps to alleviate the negative consequences of this for Russia. I am prepared to enter into an agreement with NATO, not because I want to but because it is a forced step. There is no other solution for today.”
🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack
This became known from a declassified archival document published on the website of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.
"Yeltsin and his foreign minister in 1997, Yevgeny Primakov, provided the Americans neither the “grudging endorsement” of NATO expansion that the U.S. hoped for nor even the “acquiescence” that subsequent American memoirs claimed. Rather, as Yeltsin told Clinton personally at Helsinki in March 1997: “Our position has not changed. It remains a mistake for NATO to move eastward. But I need to take steps to alleviate the negative consequences of this for Russia. I am prepared to enter into an agreement with NATO, not because I want to but because it is a forced step. There is no other solution for today.”
🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack
👍30❤28👌4🤔1
NEW: SECRET NATO EXPANSION CABLES RELEASED
Memorandum of Conversation, Clinton-Yeltsin Summit, Helsinki, Finland, “Subject: Morning Meeting with Russian President Yeltsin: NATO-Russia, START, ABM/TMD” (March 21 1997)
YELTSIN: "We want to move into 21st century with stability and tranquillity The first document is on European security I agree that Albright and Primakov moved toward accommodation in many areas but there are still some issues pending.
Our position has not changed It remains a mistake for NATO to move eastward But I need to take steps to alleviate the negative consequences of this for Russia I am prepared to enter into an agreement with NATO not because I want to but because it is a forced step There is no other solution for today The principal issues for me are the following The agreement must be legally binding -- signed by all 16 Allies Decisions by NATO are not to be taken without taking into account the concerns or opinions of Russia. Also nuclear and conventional arms cannot move eastward into new members to the borders of Russia thus creating a new cordon sanitaire aimed at Russia.
But one thing is very important enlargement should also not embrace the former Soviet republics I cannot sign any agreement without such language Especially Ukraine If you get them involved it will create difficulties in our talks with Ukraine on a number of issues We followed closely Solana's activities in Central Asia They were not to our liking He was pursuing an anti-Russian course.
I understand the complexity of this issue but we have no territorial or hegemonic claims on them or any other country We are carrying out a well-tested policy with CIS countries and the Baltics based on trust We have various plans with countries of the former Soviet Union based on trust That trust should remain Our relations with the CIS and with the Baltic countries should be like yours within NATO.
As I understand you and I have differences that it would be difficult to include in the text of the agreement Let's see what it looks like what should be obligatory and what should not be On things that did not get into the statement perhaps we can find some other document or way of doing it Perhaps it can be addressed orally Are you going to seek ratification of this agreement by Parliaments or just by heads of government We want to know where we are going. We will address this calmly and rationally.
We see how you and the Ukrainians are handling your relations It does not help us in relations with Ukraine or resolve RussianUkrainian issues We need U S restraint in dealing with Ukraine I do not want to believe you are using pressure tactics I am surprised by the activities of your congressional committees with regard to Ukraine They are not helping a settlement of Russian-Ukrainian issues.
Another problem you are conducting naval maneuvers near Crimea It is as if we were training people in Cuba How would you feel It is unacceptable to us We are not going out to seize Sevastopol Our only interest there is to maintain some infrastructure We respect Georgia Moldova and other countries and have no claims on their territory We merely want to rent some facilities for our Black Sea fleet Ryurikov hands President Yeltsin a piece of paper.)
I propose that in the statement we could accept the fact that Russia has no claims on other countries In fact regarding the countries of the former Soviet Union let us have a verbal gentlemen's agreement — we would not write it down in the statement — that no former Soviet republics would enter NATO This gentlemen's agreement would not be made public."
Memorandum of Conversation, Clinton-Yeltsin Summit, Helsinki, Finland, “Subject: Morning Meeting with Russian President Yeltsin: NATO-Russia, START, ABM/TMD” (March 21 1997)
YELTSIN: "We want to move into 21st century with stability and tranquillity The first document is on European security I agree that Albright and Primakov moved toward accommodation in many areas but there are still some issues pending.
Our position has not changed It remains a mistake for NATO to move eastward But I need to take steps to alleviate the negative consequences of this for Russia I am prepared to enter into an agreement with NATO not because I want to but because it is a forced step There is no other solution for today The principal issues for me are the following The agreement must be legally binding -- signed by all 16 Allies Decisions by NATO are not to be taken without taking into account the concerns or opinions of Russia. Also nuclear and conventional arms cannot move eastward into new members to the borders of Russia thus creating a new cordon sanitaire aimed at Russia.
But one thing is very important enlargement should also not embrace the former Soviet republics I cannot sign any agreement without such language Especially Ukraine If you get them involved it will create difficulties in our talks with Ukraine on a number of issues We followed closely Solana's activities in Central Asia They were not to our liking He was pursuing an anti-Russian course.
I understand the complexity of this issue but we have no territorial or hegemonic claims on them or any other country We are carrying out a well-tested policy with CIS countries and the Baltics based on trust We have various plans with countries of the former Soviet Union based on trust That trust should remain Our relations with the CIS and with the Baltic countries should be like yours within NATO.
As I understand you and I have differences that it would be difficult to include in the text of the agreement Let's see what it looks like what should be obligatory and what should not be On things that did not get into the statement perhaps we can find some other document or way of doing it Perhaps it can be addressed orally Are you going to seek ratification of this agreement by Parliaments or just by heads of government We want to know where we are going. We will address this calmly and rationally.
We see how you and the Ukrainians are handling your relations It does not help us in relations with Ukraine or resolve RussianUkrainian issues We need U S restraint in dealing with Ukraine I do not want to believe you are using pressure tactics I am surprised by the activities of your congressional committees with regard to Ukraine They are not helping a settlement of Russian-Ukrainian issues.
Another problem you are conducting naval maneuvers near Crimea It is as if we were training people in Cuba How would you feel It is unacceptable to us We are not going out to seize Sevastopol Our only interest there is to maintain some infrastructure We respect Georgia Moldova and other countries and have no claims on their territory We merely want to rent some facilities for our Black Sea fleet Ryurikov hands President Yeltsin a piece of paper.)
I propose that in the statement we could accept the fact that Russia has no claims on other countries In fact regarding the countries of the former Soviet Union let us have a verbal gentlemen's agreement — we would not write it down in the statement — that no former Soviet republics would enter NATO This gentlemen's agreement would not be made public."
👍29❤6
CLINTON: "I am not naive I understand you have an interest in who gets into NATO and when We need to make sure that all these are subjects that we can consult about as we move forward — consult means talk about it means making sure that we're aware of your concerns and that you understand our decisions and our positions and our thinking... I said a few days ago that I'd leave open the possibility of Russia in NATO and in any event of having a steadily improving partnership between NATO and Russia I think we'll have to continue to work this issue but we should concentrate on practical matters
Foreign Minister PRIMAKOV: "We're already agreed on certain elements — four elements We've been told to accept only American terms and conditions and have gotten nothing in return so what's needed are new instructions."
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/32237-document-14-memorandum-conversation-clinton-yeltsin-summit-helsinki-finland-subject
ROBINMG 🚀
Foreign Minister PRIMAKOV: "We're already agreed on certain elements — four elements We've been told to accept only American terms and conditions and have gotten nothing in return so what's needed are new instructions."
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/32237-document-14-memorandum-conversation-clinton-yeltsin-summit-helsinki-finland-subject
ROBINMG 🚀
Telegram
Robin Monotti
Boost this channel to help it unlock additional features.
👍32❤3