NEW STUDY: 9 out of 10 PCR "positive" results to SARSCoV2 were false positives:
"The principal finding from our analysis of ALM data on both nucleic acid amplification (PCR from mucosal swabs) and IgG antibody (serological) testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Germany between mid-March 2020 and summer 2021 is this: only 14%—and possibly even fewer, down to 10%—of individuals identified as SARS-CoV-2-positive via PCR testing were actually infected, as evidenced by detectable IgG antibodies."
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full
📱 ROBINMG
"The principal finding from our analysis of ALM data on both nucleic acid amplification (PCR from mucosal swabs) and IgG antibody (serological) testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Germany between mid-March 2020 and summer 2021 is this: only 14%—and possibly even fewer, down to 10%—of individuals identified as SARS-CoV-2-positive via PCR testing were actually infected, as evidenced by detectable IgG antibodies."
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Frontiers
Frontiers | A calibration of nucleic acid (PCR) by antibody (IgG) tests in Germany: the course of SARS-CoV-2 infections estimated
In Germany, a consortium of authority-accredited laboratories (ALM) covered approximately 90% of all severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Co...
👍35🤣11🤬10❤5😨3🍾2🔥1🤯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Interested in geopolitics, politics, global news, economy, and more? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime
Featuring
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥6❤2
Forwarded from Edward Dowd
Altman & Jensen (OpenAI and $NVDA) besides asking for a government backstop (bailout ) for AI have also inadvertently communicated something else…financing and demand behind the scenes have materially tightened and slowed.
It was basically an admission of fundamental degradation.
EDVARD DOWD
It was basically an admission of fundamental degradation.
EDVARD DOWD
Telegram
Edward Dowd
Founder of finance technologies and author of the book "The Cause is Unknown: the epidemic of sudden death in 2021 and 2022".
👍16👀13❤3🫡2
🌞🔄 SOLAR MOTION IS THE REAL CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE, NOT CO2🌍🔄
THIS IS CAUSED BY THE GRAVITATIONAL PULL OF THE PLANETS ON THE SUN AND ON EACH OTHER
"The Planetary Theory of Solar Activity Variability: A Review" - Scafetta (Earth Sciences) & Bianchini (Astronomy) - 2022.
"Reviewing the many planetary harmonics and the orbital invariant inequalities that characterize the planetary motions of the solar system from the monthly to the millennial time scales, we show that they are not randomly distributed but clearly tend to cluster around some specific values that also match those of the main solar activity cycles. In some cases, planetary models have even been able to predict the time-phase of the solar oscillations including the Schwabe 11-year sunspot cycle.
A few years after the discovery of the 11-year sunspot cycle, Wolf (1859) himself conjectured that “the variations of spot-frequency depend on the influences of Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn.” Dicke (1978) noted that the sunspot cycle shows no statistical indication of being randomly generated but rather of being synchronized by a chronometer hidden deep in the Sun.
Solar activity is characterized by several cycles like the Schwabe 11-year sunspot cycle (Schwabe, 1843), the Hale solar magnetic 22-year cycle (Hale, 1908), the Gleissberg cycle (∼85 years), the Jose cycle (∼178 years), the Suess-de Vries cycle (∼208 years), the Eddy cycle (∼1000 years), and the Bray-Hallstatt cycle (∼2300 years)
Shorter cycles are easily detected in total solar irradiance (TSI) and sunspot records, while the longer ones are detected in long-term geophysical records like the cosmogenic radionuclide ones (14C and 10Be) and in climate records (Neff et al., 2001; Steinhilber et al., 2009). Planetary cycles have also been found in aurora records (Scafetta, 2012c; Scafetta and Willson, 2013a).
Due to the evident high synchronization of planetary motions, it is worthwhile investigating the possibility that orbital frequencies could tune solar variability as well. However, although Jupiter appears to play the main role in organizing the solar system (Bank and Scafetta, 2022), its orbital period (∼11.86 years) is too long to fit the Schwabe 11-year solar cycle. Thus, any possible planetary mechanism able to create this solar modulation must involve a combination of more planets. We will see that the only frequencies that could be involved in the process are the orbital periods, the synodical periods, and their beats and harmonics.
We review the planetary theory of solar variability and show how it is today supported by many empirical and theoretical evidences at multiple timescales. We show that appropriate planetary harmonic models correlate with the 11-year solar cycle, the secular and millennial cycles, as well as with several other major oscillations observed in solar activity, and even with the occasional occurrences of solar flares. The physics behind these results is not yet fully understood, but a number of working hypotheses will be herein briefly discussed.
[See link in thread below for full journal article]
Conclusion
The solar system is made of synchronized coupled oscillators because it is characterized by a set of frequencies that are linked to each other by the harmonic Eq. 3, which are easily detected in the solar wobbling. Thus, it is then reasonable to hypothesize that the solar activity could be also tuned to planetary frequencies.
Nicola Scafetta, Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Georesources, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Antonio Bianchini, INAF, Astronomical Observatory of Padua, Padua, Italy
FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY & SPACE SCIENCE
SECTION: STELLAR & SOLAR PHYSICS. AUG. 2022:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2022.937930/full
📱 ROBINMG
THIS IS CAUSED BY THE GRAVITATIONAL PULL OF THE PLANETS ON THE SUN AND ON EACH OTHER
"The Planetary Theory of Solar Activity Variability: A Review" - Scafetta (Earth Sciences) & Bianchini (Astronomy) - 2022.
"Reviewing the many planetary harmonics and the orbital invariant inequalities that characterize the planetary motions of the solar system from the monthly to the millennial time scales, we show that they are not randomly distributed but clearly tend to cluster around some specific values that also match those of the main solar activity cycles. In some cases, planetary models have even been able to predict the time-phase of the solar oscillations including the Schwabe 11-year sunspot cycle.
A few years after the discovery of the 11-year sunspot cycle, Wolf (1859) himself conjectured that “the variations of spot-frequency depend on the influences of Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn.” Dicke (1978) noted that the sunspot cycle shows no statistical indication of being randomly generated but rather of being synchronized by a chronometer hidden deep in the Sun.
Solar activity is characterized by several cycles like the Schwabe 11-year sunspot cycle (Schwabe, 1843), the Hale solar magnetic 22-year cycle (Hale, 1908), the Gleissberg cycle (∼85 years), the Jose cycle (∼178 years), the Suess-de Vries cycle (∼208 years), the Eddy cycle (∼1000 years), and the Bray-Hallstatt cycle (∼2300 years)
Shorter cycles are easily detected in total solar irradiance (TSI) and sunspot records, while the longer ones are detected in long-term geophysical records like the cosmogenic radionuclide ones (14C and 10Be) and in climate records (Neff et al., 2001; Steinhilber et al., 2009). Planetary cycles have also been found in aurora records (Scafetta, 2012c; Scafetta and Willson, 2013a).
Due to the evident high synchronization of planetary motions, it is worthwhile investigating the possibility that orbital frequencies could tune solar variability as well. However, although Jupiter appears to play the main role in organizing the solar system (Bank and Scafetta, 2022), its orbital period (∼11.86 years) is too long to fit the Schwabe 11-year solar cycle. Thus, any possible planetary mechanism able to create this solar modulation must involve a combination of more planets. We will see that the only frequencies that could be involved in the process are the orbital periods, the synodical periods, and their beats and harmonics.
We review the planetary theory of solar variability and show how it is today supported by many empirical and theoretical evidences at multiple timescales. We show that appropriate planetary harmonic models correlate with the 11-year solar cycle, the secular and millennial cycles, as well as with several other major oscillations observed in solar activity, and even with the occasional occurrences of solar flares. The physics behind these results is not yet fully understood, but a number of working hypotheses will be herein briefly discussed.
[See link in thread below for full journal article]
Conclusion
The solar system is made of synchronized coupled oscillators because it is characterized by a set of frequencies that are linked to each other by the harmonic Eq. 3, which are easily detected in the solar wobbling. Thus, it is then reasonable to hypothesize that the solar activity could be also tuned to planetary frequencies.
Nicola Scafetta, Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Georesources, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Antonio Bianchini, INAF, Astronomical Observatory of Padua, Padua, Italy
FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY & SPACE SCIENCE
SECTION: STELLAR & SOLAR PHYSICS. AUG. 2022:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2022.937930/full
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍38❤27👏3💯3🤔2🤮2
Robin Monotti
🌞🔄 SOLAR MOTION IS THE REAL CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE, NOT CO2🌍🔄 THIS IS CAUSED BY THE GRAVITATIONAL PULL OF THE PLANETS ON THE SUN AND ON EACH OTHER "The Planetary Theory of Solar Activity Variability: A Review" - Scafetta (Earth Sciences) & Bianchini (Astronomy)…
IMAGINE, IF YOU WILL:
That the Sun, 109 times wider than Earth meaning approximately 1.3 million Earths could fit inside it, is actually not static, but that it MOVES [Solar Inertial Motion - posted above], across a distance that is 3 Sun widths, or by a distance 327 wider than the Earth. Now imagine that this distance is what actually affects the intensity of solar radiation and the humidity on Earth, meaning that it modulates the amount of cloud cover the Earth has. Now imagine that the varying % of humidity & cloud cover is what determines climate and temperature, as is easily demonstrated by noting temperature changes on a sunny, dry, humid or cloudy day. Now you understand climate change. It has nothing at all to do with CO2 of course.
📱 ROBINMG
That the Sun, 109 times wider than Earth meaning approximately 1.3 million Earths could fit inside it, is actually not static, but that it MOVES [Solar Inertial Motion - posted above], across a distance that is 3 Sun widths, or by a distance 327 wider than the Earth. Now imagine that this distance is what actually affects the intensity of solar radiation and the humidity on Earth, meaning that it modulates the amount of cloud cover the Earth has. Now imagine that the varying % of humidity & cloud cover is what determines climate and temperature, as is easily demonstrated by noting temperature changes on a sunny, dry, humid or cloudy day. Now you understand climate change. It has nothing at all to do with CO2 of course.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍48💯37❤12🤣6🤯2😁1🙏1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🏆29👍14❤4🙏2😁1🤔1
I'm no "coincidence theorist" but sure this is "accidental"?
Seems to work hand in glove with the current strategy of tension...
📱 ROBINMG
Seems to work hand in glove with the current strategy of tension...
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯66❤7👀3😁2😡2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THE GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE
UK Channel 4 Documentary (2007)
Part 1: Fake consensus & the IPCC:
Professor Tim Ball, PhD in Climatology:
"When people say we don't believe in global warming,
I say no, I believe in global warming, I don't believe that human CO2 is causing that warming."
Synopsis:
'Everything you've ever been told about Global Warming is probably untrue. This film blows the whistle on the biggest swindle in modern history. We are told that 'Man Made Global Warming' is the biggest ever threat to mankind. There is no room for scientific doubt. Well, watch this film and make up your own mind.'
Written and directed by Martin Durkin
Full film:
https://t.me/robinmg/29589
x.com/robinmonotti/status/1987089517887521172?s=19
📱 ROBINMG
UK Channel 4 Documentary (2007)
Part 1: Fake consensus & the IPCC:
Professor Tim Ball, PhD in Climatology:
"When people say we don't believe in global warming,
I say no, I believe in global warming, I don't believe that human CO2 is causing that warming."
Synopsis:
'Everything you've ever been told about Global Warming is probably untrue. This film blows the whistle on the biggest swindle in modern history. We are told that 'Man Made Global Warming' is the biggest ever threat to mankind. There is no room for scientific doubt. Well, watch this film and make up your own mind.'
Written and directed by Martin Durkin
Full film:
https://t.me/robinmg/29589
x.com/robinmonotti/status/1987089517887521172?s=19
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍32🔥19❤9💯3👏1
Euripides was taken in for questioning after writing this above on social media. He was later sentenced for having "caused offence" to all those who remain silent in the face of injustice in a joint action with all pathological liars under the Starmer regime.
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥53🤬20👍8👌7❤6👏4🙏2
Robin Monotti
THE GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE UK Channel 4 Documentary (2007) Part 1: Fake consensus & the IPCC: Professor Tim Ball, PhD in Climatology: "When people say we don't believe in global warming, I say no, I believe in global warming, I don't believe that human…
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍39🤨14😱11🤬7🙏2😡2
CO2 is emitted by the Oceans centuries AFTER atmospheric temperatures warm according to climate cycles: most atmospheric CO2 is NOT man made, it is OCEAN released.
The Ocean stores less CO2 as it warms, hence CO2 increases in the atmosphere. This process can have a time lag of 600-800 years.
📱 ROBINMG
The Ocean stores less CO2 as it warms, hence CO2 increases in the atmosphere. This process can have a time lag of 600-800 years.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍55💯14🔥3😁3❤2🤷♂1🙏1🤪1
Take a bottle of cold sparkling water and warm it up. What happens? It releases the carbon dioxide into the air, that is why it is no longer fizzy after it is heated up. Water retains CO2 when cold & emits it as it warms. The Oceans behave in exactly the same way. It is basic science that CO2 is emitted by the Oceans as a result of their heating, and NOT the cause!
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍59💯25❤5🤪2
WATER VAPOUR, NOT CO2, NOT METHANE, IS THE ONLY GREENHOUSE GAS WITH ANY EFFECT ON CLIMATE!
NITROGEN 78%
OXYGEN 21%
WATER VAPOUR variable 0.5-2%
ARGON 0.9%
CARBON DIOXIDE 0.04%
METHANE 0.00019%
📱 ROBINMG
NITROGEN 78%
OXYGEN 21%
WATER VAPOUR variable 0.5-2%
ARGON 0.9%
CARBON DIOXIDE 0.04%
METHANE 0.00019%
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍43💯9🔥8❤5👏3🙏2🤪1
METHANE IS CONTINUOUSLY FORMED IN THE EARTH'S MANTLE: COW FARTS ARE NOT THE SOURCE!
"We present in situ observations of hydrocarbon formation via carbonate reduction at upper mantle pressures and temperatures. Methane was formed from FeO, CaCO(3)-calcite, and water at pressures between 5 and 11 GPa and temperatures ranging from 500 degrees C to 1,500 degrees C. The results are shown to be consistent with multiphase thermodynamic calculations based on the statistical mechanics of soft particle mixtures. The study demonstrates the existence of abiogenic pathways for the formation of hydrocarbons in the Earth's interior and suggests that the hydrocarbon budget of the bulk Earth may be larger than conventionally assumed."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15381767/
📱 ROBINMG
"We present in situ observations of hydrocarbon formation via carbonate reduction at upper mantle pressures and temperatures. Methane was formed from FeO, CaCO(3)-calcite, and water at pressures between 5 and 11 GPa and temperatures ranging from 500 degrees C to 1,500 degrees C. The results are shown to be consistent with multiphase thermodynamic calculations based on the statistical mechanics of soft particle mixtures. The study demonstrates the existence of abiogenic pathways for the formation of hydrocarbons in the Earth's interior and suggests that the hydrocarbon budget of the bulk Earth may be larger than conventionally assumed."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15381767/
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍39❤8😁4🙏2🤔1
OIL & GAS ARE NOT "FOSSIL FUELS" THEY ARE A RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE CREATED BY A GEOTHERMAL REACTION BETWEEN THE SOLID MANTLE & LIQUID CORE:
'Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons and Oil and Gas Deposits Formation'
"The theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons recognizes that the petroleum is a primordial material of deep origin [Kutcherov, Krayushkin 2010]. This theory explains that hydrocarbon compounds generate in the asthenosphere of the Earth & migrate through the deep faults into the crust of the Earth. There they form oil & gas deposits in any kind of rock in any kind of the structural position (Fig. 1). Thus the accumulation of oil & gas is considered as a part of the natural process of the Earth’s outgrassing, responsible for creation of its hydrosphere, atmosphere & biosphere. Until recently the obstacle to accept the theory of the abyssal abiogenic origin of hydrocarbons was the lack of the reliable & reproducible experimental results confirming the possibility of the synthesis of complex hydrocarbon systems under the conditions of the asthenosphere of planet earth."
Link to scientific article in post below:
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
📱 ROBINMG
'Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons and Oil and Gas Deposits Formation'
"The theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons recognizes that the petroleum is a primordial material of deep origin [Kutcherov, Krayushkin 2010]. This theory explains that hydrocarbon compounds generate in the asthenosphere of the Earth & migrate through the deep faults into the crust of the Earth. There they form oil & gas deposits in any kind of rock in any kind of the structural position (Fig. 1). Thus the accumulation of oil & gas is considered as a part of the natural process of the Earth’s outgrassing, responsible for creation of its hydrosphere, atmosphere & biosphere. Until recently the obstacle to accept the theory of the abyssal abiogenic origin of hydrocarbons was the lack of the reliable & reproducible experimental results confirming the possibility of the synthesis of complex hydrocarbon systems under the conditions of the asthenosphere of planet earth."
Link to scientific article in post below:
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41889
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍48💯31❤12👏6