Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
"Did you know that Pearce has to lie about who he is and what our ancestors endured because it doesn't fit your anti-colonial narrative?". I proceeded to share our family's oral tradition of being massacred in 1600's Bay de Verde by the First Nations who were paid by the French to wipe us out. Our little village went from 500ppl to 27 and we were erased/excluded from the history books but we can't talk about that because it doesn't fit with the victim narrative embedded in the curriculum and would call into question the Land Indoctrination that hypnotizes the children every day over the PA."
"Do you think it's right that we have to hide our proud heritage and feign shame in order to be allowed to exist in the classroom? - she actually told me that Pearce has the right to be proud of his heritage and there should be NO shame placed on him. She then said that Board was moving away from anti-colonial narratives and have scrapped the word colonialism. I told her that I was happy to hear that but the damage has been done.
She started to talk about Human Rights and I stopped her. I explained that the HRT made it clear to me that people who look like me, don't qualify. I told her the quotes I used when filing the complaint and that they would be considered hateful ONLY if any other colour was being referenced. Then I told her that there was only one demographic that had even less human rights than my family and those are unborn babies. She winced and I asked her if her reaction was indicative of her intolerance for people who are pro life. She said she wasn't touching that and I told her, that was clear to see but very sad for kids who believe babies are humans too.
I left her with this: "In life there is good and evil, positive and negative. Goodness comes from the heart. It's inclusive, supportive and brings people together despite differences. Evil seeks to divide, separate, segregate and alienate. It runs on fear and division. I would like you to look at the school through a lens of Good and Evil and ask yourself what policies seek to unite and which seek to divide. For example, I would never allow my son to belong to an all white club because of how uncivilized it is. Does a club that bases membership solely on pigmentation seek to unify or separate it's members from the other demographics?
She told me I had given her A LOT to think about and that she needs time to sit with some of the points I brought up. I told her that she had done more to make me feel heard than ANY other member of the PDSB in the last 8yrs. I explained that the Superintendent wouldn't even have this conversation with me and the Human Rights people were beyond feckless. She told me she would make sure that staff are mindful of anti white racism and make sure it is not promoted in any way. She also said we will be having a Christmas tree in the foyer!
This is what I call progress!
#winning
#goodparentingtips
#mamabear
PS> poster posted below
"Do you think it's right that we have to hide our proud heritage and feign shame in order to be allowed to exist in the classroom? - she actually told me that Pearce has the right to be proud of his heritage and there should be NO shame placed on him. She then said that Board was moving away from anti-colonial narratives and have scrapped the word colonialism. I told her that I was happy to hear that but the damage has been done.
She started to talk about Human Rights and I stopped her. I explained that the HRT made it clear to me that people who look like me, don't qualify. I told her the quotes I used when filing the complaint and that they would be considered hateful ONLY if any other colour was being referenced. Then I told her that there was only one demographic that had even less human rights than my family and those are unborn babies. She winced and I asked her if her reaction was indicative of her intolerance for people who are pro life. She said she wasn't touching that and I told her, that was clear to see but very sad for kids who believe babies are humans too.
I left her with this: "In life there is good and evil, positive and negative. Goodness comes from the heart. It's inclusive, supportive and brings people together despite differences. Evil seeks to divide, separate, segregate and alienate. It runs on fear and division. I would like you to look at the school through a lens of Good and Evil and ask yourself what policies seek to unite and which seek to divide. For example, I would never allow my son to belong to an all white club because of how uncivilized it is. Does a club that bases membership solely on pigmentation seek to unify or separate it's members from the other demographics?
She told me I had given her A LOT to think about and that she needs time to sit with some of the points I brought up. I told her that she had done more to make me feel heard than ANY other member of the PDSB in the last 8yrs. I explained that the Superintendent wouldn't even have this conversation with me and the Human Rights people were beyond feckless. She told me she would make sure that staff are mindful of anti white racism and make sure it is not promoted in any way. She also said we will be having a Christmas tree in the foyer!
This is what I call progress!
#winning
#goodparentingtips
#mamabear
PS> poster posted below
❤1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
S4T Friday Zoom @ 8PM (EST)
We know Carney is an implant with an agenda. Peter Foster captured much of Carney's agenda in a 2021 National Post Article. Read the article HERE.
Foster points out that Carney claims that capitalism has made society “morally rotten” and insists it must be restructured through “rigid controls on personal freedom, industry, and corporate funding.”
His so-called “Brave New World" will bring “severely constrained choices; less flying, less meat, more inconvenience and more poverty.” Carney states that “assets will be stranded, gasoline-powered cars unsaleable, inefficient properties unrentable.” Through his “Network for Greening the Financial System,” he seeks to control finance itself to enforce this vision, without consent.
The goal is a technocratic dictatorship resulting in a system of total financial/social control.
The burning question... is this treason? Let's discuss tonight!
Zoom: https://tinyurl.com/2ukss9wf
Rumble: https://tinyurl.com/mtmkm826
We know Carney is an implant with an agenda. Peter Foster captured much of Carney's agenda in a 2021 National Post Article. Read the article HERE.
Foster points out that Carney claims that capitalism has made society “morally rotten” and insists it must be restructured through “rigid controls on personal freedom, industry, and corporate funding.”
His so-called “Brave New World" will bring “severely constrained choices; less flying, less meat, more inconvenience and more poverty.” Carney states that “assets will be stranded, gasoline-powered cars unsaleable, inefficient properties unrentable.” Through his “Network for Greening the Financial System,” he seeks to control finance itself to enforce this vision, without consent.
The goal is a technocratic dictatorship resulting in a system of total financial/social control.
The burning question... is this treason? Let's discuss tonight!
Zoom: https://tinyurl.com/2ukss9wf
Rumble: https://tinyurl.com/mtmkm826
Forwarded from 🇨🇦 Private Canadian News 🇨🇦
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
‼️ Mark Carney says the Old World Order is disappearing and a new one is yet to emerge.
Except we know what your NWO looks like. Digital IDs, CBDCs, UBI, Chinese style social credit system.
And you're sabotaging our US relationship to collapse our economy and implement it.
We reject you, your WEF puppet masters and the NWO. GFY!
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🇨🇦PCN | t.me/PrivateCanadianNews
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Except we know what your NWO looks like. Digital IDs, CBDCs, UBI, Chinese style social credit system.
And you're sabotaging our US relationship to collapse our economy and implement it.
We reject you, your WEF puppet masters and the NWO. GFY!
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🇨🇦PCN | t.me/PrivateCanadianNews
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
👍4🔥1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️‼️No Friday Zoom Tonight, Oct 31st‼️‼️
Have a Great Friday Night!
No Friday Zoom tonight! We’re taking a short break this week, so it’s the perfect time to catch up on any sessions you may have missed. You can find all our previous discussions and deep dives on the Stand4THEE Rumble channel here: https://rumble.com/user/Stand4THEE.
We’ll be back next week with more important updates and conversations you won’t want to miss.
See you next week!
Have a Great Friday Night!
No Friday Zoom tonight! We’re taking a short break this week, so it’s the perfect time to catch up on any sessions you may have missed. You can find all our previous discussions and deep dives on the Stand4THEE Rumble channel here: https://rumble.com/user/Stand4THEE.
We’ll be back next week with more important updates and conversations you won’t want to miss.
See you next week!
👍2❤1
Wow. I'm sooooo shocked by this.
For this who are confused about Daniel Smith... KNOW THIS - the PROVINCES create and control the municipalities. They exist ONLY through statute.
So, what is happening in Edmonton is NOT an Edmonton policy, it is a provincial policy pushed down to municipalities.
For this who are confused about Daniel Smith... KNOW THIS - the PROVINCES create and control the municipalities. They exist ONLY through statute.
So, what is happening in Edmonton is NOT an Edmonton policy, it is a provincial policy pushed down to municipalities.
Forwarded from The Angry Albertan (The Angry Albertan)
No shit Sherlock, send them HOME! All of them.
https://edmonton.citynews.ca/2025/10/29/edmonton-newcomers-poll/
https://edmonton.citynews.ca/2025/10/29/edmonton-newcomers-poll/
CityNews
More than half of Edmontonians feel newcomers are not having a positive impact on the city: CityNews poll
Between immigration and a provincial campaign calling residents from other provinces to set up shop here, Alberta’s population has boomed.
👍2
This is absolutely disgusting and shameful.
Our veterans are put on the back burner while foreigners come here and disregard our culture, push theirs on us AND get THOUSANDS of dollars of our heardearned taxes... while our vets are offered MAID.
WHERE is veterans affairs in a of this? They going along with this????
https://toronto.citynews.ca/2025/11/04/canada-post-honours-sikh-soldiers-with-new-remembrance-day-stamp/
Our veterans are put on the back burner while foreigners come here and disregard our culture, push theirs on us AND get THOUSANDS of dollars of our heardearned taxes... while our vets are offered MAID.
WHERE is veterans affairs in a of this? They going along with this????
https://toronto.citynews.ca/2025/11/04/canada-post-honours-sikh-soldiers-with-new-remembrance-day-stamp/
CityNews
Canada Post honours Sikh soldiers with new Remembrance Day stamp
Canada Post unveiled a new commemorative stamp at the annual Sikh Remembrance Day ceremony in Kitchener, Ont. over the weekend.
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
S4T Friday Zoom Nov 7th - Islam Infiltration
How did newly elected New York Mayor and Socialist Muslim, Zorhan Mamdani, https://tinyurl.com/f89fv8a4l, rise to power at such a rapid pace? And what does the future hold for New York?
Watch Cash Jordan break down the fall-out of Mamdani's win HERE: https://tinyurl.com/yr54u2pd. Also, check out this huge Muslim prayer in Times Square after the Mamdani win, HERE: https://tinyurl.com/4uxw63vh.
Canada is now standing on the same edge. Our Muslim population has nearly doubled in ten years, from just over 1 million in 2011 to nearly 2 million (4.9%) in 2021.
Meanwhile, Ottawa is steam rolling ahead with Bill C-3, https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/45-1/c-3 an act that amends to the Citizenship Act to expand citizenship by descent beyond the first generation.
Is Bill C-3, plus weak border control and loss of identity in the name of "inclusion" eroding Canadian values?
Zoom: https://tinyurl.com/2ukss9wf
Rumble: https://tinyurl.com/yyn3tyrm
How did newly elected New York Mayor and Socialist Muslim, Zorhan Mamdani, https://tinyurl.com/f89fv8a4l, rise to power at such a rapid pace? And what does the future hold for New York?
Watch Cash Jordan break down the fall-out of Mamdani's win HERE: https://tinyurl.com/yr54u2pd. Also, check out this huge Muslim prayer in Times Square after the Mamdani win, HERE: https://tinyurl.com/4uxw63vh.
Canada is now standing on the same edge. Our Muslim population has nearly doubled in ten years, from just over 1 million in 2011 to nearly 2 million (4.9%) in 2021.
Meanwhile, Ottawa is steam rolling ahead with Bill C-3, https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/45-1/c-3 an act that amends to the Citizenship Act to expand citizenship by descent beyond the first generation.
Is Bill C-3, plus weak border control and loss of identity in the name of "inclusion" eroding Canadian values?
Zoom: https://tinyurl.com/2ukss9wf
Rumble: https://tinyurl.com/yyn3tyrm
❤1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
"A population ignorant of it's own laws is easy to control".
The same goes for Canada. Some FACTS:
1. Canada is NOT a democracy, we are a Constitutional Monarchy.
2. The Prime Minister is NOT the head of state (it's not even a real role in the House, it's a Constitutional Convention)
3. The Governor General is the Head of State
4. The Cabinet is a Constitutional Convention.
Canada is at the exact same risk as New York. If we don't educate ourselves, we can very easily end up in the same situation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUNSdbNvL7I
The same goes for Canada. Some FACTS:
1. Canada is NOT a democracy, we are a Constitutional Monarchy.
2. The Prime Minister is NOT the head of state (it's not even a real role in the House, it's a Constitutional Convention)
3. The Governor General is the Head of State
4. The Cabinet is a Constitutional Convention.
Canada is at the exact same risk as New York. If we don't educate ourselves, we can very easily end up in the same situation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUNSdbNvL7I
YouTube
Voters TURN on Zohran Mamdani! — New Yorkers Admit “We Messed Up!” 😳
ARP family, safeguard your personal data before it’s too late. Check out my sponsor https://aura.com/wise and start your 14-day free trial today. See if your information is already exposed—and protect yourself now. Stay safe, stay wise, stay righteous.
BUY…
BUY…
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️‼️LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - ON REMEMBRANCE DAY????‼️‼️
Copied from Lisa Turnbull
Another day, another reason to fight! I sent this email to the principal of my son's school. There are rumours of Land Acknowledgements being part of our Remembrance Day ceremonies. I will not stand for that. Here's what I sent the school:
Hello Ms.______
We had a productive meeting last month with regards to some of the concerns over the hateful rhetoric on display by your staff.
I was happy to hear that the Minister of Education has gotten involved although I can’t say I have much confidence in the 3rd party investigation that will take place.
The reason for my lack of enthusiasm is because this government did the same thing when parents objected to convicted pedophile, Ben Levin’s idea of sexual health for children. Call me crazy but I think that a man convicted of making, distributing and coaching pedophilia, is not the right person to be creating such a curriculum but apparently the 3rd party who investigated his “most shining accomplishment” thought it was just fine.
Fast forward to today.
We have friends and family who reside in Richmond, BC. They have just lost ownership of their houses due to an activist judge who was radicalized by the incessant repeating of Land Acknowledgements. Their children are happy because they were taught in school to believe the homes their parents purchased and have been paying taxes on, were stolen.
Our family categorically REJECTS the premise, purpose and desired outcomes of the Land Acknowledgement. The best and easiest way to brainwash a person is to force them to repeat a lie over and over.
Forcing children to listen to something that implies theft of the land they are standing on, is harmful not only to those of us who are proud of our Canadian heritage, but also those who sacrificed everything to come live here.
It is a slap in the face to paint every Canadian (citizen of not) a thief and that is exactly what you are doing.
While I understand it is impossible for my child to avoid the trauma you inflict upon him every day when the lie is announced (I tell him to recite the Lords Prayer whilst it’s being broadcast), I will NOT tolerate his participation in a Remembrance Day ceremony that puts this shameful practice on display.
Please advise if your intention is to spit on the memories of my grandfathers by soiling the ceremony with one. If that is case, I will pick him up early from school and take him to the Cenotaph where they will be holding a proper ceremony for our fallen.
Thanks for understanding.
***PARENTS***
Do you know if YOUR child's school is doing the same?
Copied from Lisa Turnbull
Another day, another reason to fight! I sent this email to the principal of my son's school. There are rumours of Land Acknowledgements being part of our Remembrance Day ceremonies. I will not stand for that. Here's what I sent the school:
Hello Ms.______
We had a productive meeting last month with regards to some of the concerns over the hateful rhetoric on display by your staff.
I was happy to hear that the Minister of Education has gotten involved although I can’t say I have much confidence in the 3rd party investigation that will take place.
The reason for my lack of enthusiasm is because this government did the same thing when parents objected to convicted pedophile, Ben Levin’s idea of sexual health for children. Call me crazy but I think that a man convicted of making, distributing and coaching pedophilia, is not the right person to be creating such a curriculum but apparently the 3rd party who investigated his “most shining accomplishment” thought it was just fine.
Fast forward to today.
We have friends and family who reside in Richmond, BC. They have just lost ownership of their houses due to an activist judge who was radicalized by the incessant repeating of Land Acknowledgements. Their children are happy because they were taught in school to believe the homes their parents purchased and have been paying taxes on, were stolen.
Our family categorically REJECTS the premise, purpose and desired outcomes of the Land Acknowledgement. The best and easiest way to brainwash a person is to force them to repeat a lie over and over.
Forcing children to listen to something that implies theft of the land they are standing on, is harmful not only to those of us who are proud of our Canadian heritage, but also those who sacrificed everything to come live here.
It is a slap in the face to paint every Canadian (citizen of not) a thief and that is exactly what you are doing.
While I understand it is impossible for my child to avoid the trauma you inflict upon him every day when the lie is announced (I tell him to recite the Lords Prayer whilst it’s being broadcast), I will NOT tolerate his participation in a Remembrance Day ceremony that puts this shameful practice on display.
Please advise if your intention is to spit on the memories of my grandfathers by soiling the ceremony with one. If that is case, I will pick him up early from school and take him to the Cenotaph where they will be holding a proper ceremony for our fallen.
Thanks for understanding.
***PARENTS***
Do you know if YOUR child's school is doing the same?
👍4
Forwarded from Qanon* The Rise and Fall of Carnage Carney (MSM Lies 2U Death to NWO)
🇨🇦 Liberals dished out $7.1 billion on childcare for non-citizens 😱
The Liberal government has revealed that it spent over $7.1 billion in taxpayer dollars on childcare for non-permanent residents and other non-citizens over the last nine years.
🤔 ... your hard earned tax dollars supporting non-citizens.
https://truenorthwire.com/2025/11/exclusive-liberals-dished-out-7-1-billion-on-childcare-for-non-citizens/
Nov 8, 2025
Taxpayers paying $195 a day to house illegal immigrants
An Inquiry Of Ministry tabled in the House of Commons revealed that hotel rooms now cost $132.38 per night on average, down from $140 last year, while daily meals fell from $84 to $62.18.
Overall, the combined bill for accommodation, food, and basic services dropped from $224 per day to $195.
The numbers exclude additional costs for snacks, bottled water, and other supplies distributed by the Canada Border Services Agency, which averaged $28.32 per person. 🤔 ... per day?
The figures were released in response to a question from Conservative MP Lianne Rood, who asked for a breakdown of “goods and services” provided to asylum claimants entering Canada illegally.
🤔 ... would it not be more cost effective, and beneficial to just deport them? And have them go through official channels as they had to go through in the past? Why are Canadian tax payers burdened, when they themselves, have difficulty in covering their day to day living costs and expenses?
https://www.westernstandard.news/news/taxpayers-paying-195-a-day-to-house-illegal-immigrants/68766
Nov 8, 2025
The Liberal government has revealed that it spent over $7.1 billion in taxpayer dollars on childcare for non-permanent residents and other non-citizens over the last nine years.
🤔 ... your hard earned tax dollars supporting non-citizens.
https://truenorthwire.com/2025/11/exclusive-liberals-dished-out-7-1-billion-on-childcare-for-non-citizens/
Nov 8, 2025
Taxpayers paying $195 a day to house illegal immigrants
An Inquiry Of Ministry tabled in the House of Commons revealed that hotel rooms now cost $132.38 per night on average, down from $140 last year, while daily meals fell from $84 to $62.18.
Overall, the combined bill for accommodation, food, and basic services dropped from $224 per day to $195.
The numbers exclude additional costs for snacks, bottled water, and other supplies distributed by the Canada Border Services Agency, which averaged $28.32 per person. 🤔 ... per day?
The figures were released in response to a question from Conservative MP Lianne Rood, who asked for a breakdown of “goods and services” provided to asylum claimants entering Canada illegally.
🤔 ... would it not be more cost effective, and beneficial to just deport them? And have them go through official channels as they had to go through in the past? Why are Canadian tax payers burdened, when they themselves, have difficulty in covering their day to day living costs and expenses?
https://www.westernstandard.news/news/taxpayers-paying-195-a-day-to-house-illegal-immigrants/68766
Nov 8, 2025
True North Wire
EXCLUSIVE: Liberals dished out $7.1 billion on childcare for non-citizens
The Liberal government has revealed that it spent over $7.1 billion in taxpayer dollars on childcare for non-permanent residents and other non-citizens over the last nine years.
In a written response to a question from Conservative MP Brad Vis, the Liberal…
In a written response to a question from Conservative MP Brad Vis, the Liberal…
🤮3👍1
Forwarded from Charlie-Whiskey: Mary
“What happened to Canada’s courts — in plain English”
About 10 years ago, the way judges were chosen in Canada changed.
The changes didn’t improve the justice system — they weakened it.
Here’s what it means in practical terms:
• Judges started being selected for political reasons, not legal skill.
Instead of choosing the best litigators or people with strong courtroom experience, the process shifted to checking identity boxes and requiring judges to write letters about how they had faced discrimination. Ability became less important than narrative.
• Committees that used to be made up of experienced lawyers were replaced.
People who wanted judges chosen for excellence were pushed out.
People who supported the new political criteria were brought in.
• Court staff (called “registries”) gained more influence.
Before, cases were randomly assigned to judges.
Now, there’s room for bias: files may go to judges who are expected to produce certain outcomes.
• The legal profession lost independence.
The government reshaped the selection rules so the legal profession no longer chooses its best members to become judges.
That tradition had existed for hundreds of years — gone almost overnight.
• The result:
The rule of law in Canada has declined, and the courts don’t function the way they used to.
About 10 years ago, the way judges were chosen in Canada changed.
The changes didn’t improve the justice system — they weakened it.
Here’s what it means in practical terms:
• Judges started being selected for political reasons, not legal skill.
Instead of choosing the best litigators or people with strong courtroom experience, the process shifted to checking identity boxes and requiring judges to write letters about how they had faced discrimination. Ability became less important than narrative.
• Committees that used to be made up of experienced lawyers were replaced.
People who wanted judges chosen for excellence were pushed out.
People who supported the new political criteria were brought in.
• Court staff (called “registries”) gained more influence.
Before, cases were randomly assigned to judges.
Now, there’s room for bias: files may go to judges who are expected to produce certain outcomes.
• The legal profession lost independence.
The government reshaped the selection rules so the legal profession no longer chooses its best members to become judges.
That tradition had existed for hundreds of years — gone almost overnight.
• The result:
The rule of law in Canada has declined, and the courts don’t function the way they used to.
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️‼️Stand4THEE Friday Zoom @ 8PM (EST)‼️‼️
Time is of the Essence on Bill C-3!
Canada is being reshaped, and not for the better, and Bill C-3 is the latest step in that direction. This bill accelerates population pressures, threatens our national identity, and adds massive financial strain on Canadians who are already stretched to the breaking point. And it’s being pushed forward without any consideration for the people living here.
Tonight we’ll work through the public-interest letter. This is an opportunity to remind the MPs they are accountable to their constituents and bound by Section 9 of the BNA Act to act in the interest of Canadians, not the globalist agenda.
Some key issues with Bill C-3:
1. Potential for "chain migration" allowing for unlimited descent, meaning a person could get citizenship through a Canadian relative who only had a brief connection to the country decades ago.
2. Weakens citizenship by making it easier for those with no meaningful ties to become citizens, devaluing what it means to be Canadian.
3. Rejection of amendments such as requiring language skills and security assessments.
4. Lack of core identity, the bill reflects a "post-national" view of Canada and undermines its core identity.
Bill C-3 is not just another bill, it’s a tipping point. And if we don’t respond, nobody will.
Join us and help finalize the letter that tells Parliament that Canadians come first.
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v71q6fc-s4t-friday-zoom-nov-17th-bill-c-3-is-coming-in-fast.html
#billc3
#stand4theee
#Canadafirst
Time is of the Essence on Bill C-3!
Canada is being reshaped, and not for the better, and Bill C-3 is the latest step in that direction. This bill accelerates population pressures, threatens our national identity, and adds massive financial strain on Canadians who are already stretched to the breaking point. And it’s being pushed forward without any consideration for the people living here.
Tonight we’ll work through the public-interest letter. This is an opportunity to remind the MPs they are accountable to their constituents and bound by Section 9 of the BNA Act to act in the interest of Canadians, not the globalist agenda.
Some key issues with Bill C-3:
1. Potential for "chain migration" allowing for unlimited descent, meaning a person could get citizenship through a Canadian relative who only had a brief connection to the country decades ago.
2. Weakens citizenship by making it easier for those with no meaningful ties to become citizens, devaluing what it means to be Canadian.
3. Rejection of amendments such as requiring language skills and security assessments.
4. Lack of core identity, the bill reflects a "post-national" view of Canada and undermines its core identity.
Bill C-3 is not just another bill, it’s a tipping point. And if we don’t respond, nobody will.
Join us and help finalize the letter that tells Parliament that Canadians come first.
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v71q6fc-s4t-friday-zoom-nov-17th-bill-c-3-is-coming-in-fast.html
#billc3
#stand4theee
#Canadafirst
Zoom
Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise cloud communications.
❤1
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
‼️‼️BILL C-3 GOING TO THE SENATE FOR FINAL READING THURS, NOV 20TH!!!‼️‼️
Read more details on Bill C-3 HERE: https://stand4thee.com/
EMAIL LETTER TO COPY AND PASTE:
SUBJECT LINE: Bill C-3 Constitutional, Procedural, and Public-Interest Failures
Minister Diab,
I am writing to express serious and urgent concerns about Bill C-3, a bill that threatens the integrity of Canadian citizenship, undermines national identity, and was advanced through Parliament on a foundation of legal ambiguity, political haste, and procedural negligence.
You are already aware that Bill C-3 is being justified on the basis of the Bjorkquist et al. v. Attorney General of Canada ruling (2023 ONSC 7152). What Canadians have not been told is this:
Bjorkquist was not a Supreme Court or appellate decision; it came from a single judge of the Ontario Superior Court.
The ruling declared the first-generation limit unconstitutional and suspended invalidity for six months, which expired in June 2024 and was extended FIVE times since then.
The government had clear options: appeal, seek clarification, or submit a reference to the Supreme Court, these are the established processes when dealing with questions of national policy, citizenship, and constitutional rights.
Instead, the government chose not to appeal, creating artificial urgency and using the suspended deadline as political pressure to force a rushed bill through Parliament.
This was a political choice, not a legal necessity. Other governments have appealed similar lower-court rulings to ensure clarity and stability as seen in Carter, Truchon, and other major constitutional cases. The refusal to appeal Bjorkquist abandoned that principle and set the stage for the legislative chaos now unfolding.
Because of that failure, Bill C-3 is being rammed through with limited debate, overturned amendments, shallow committee hearings, and virtually no opportunity for Canadians to understand the consequences. Even the Senate has acknowledged the government’s pattern of exploiting court deadlines to bypass sober second thought.
Beyond procedural misconduct, the substance of Bill C-3 is deeply flawed:
- It opens the door to chain migration, enabling citizenship claims from people with no real connection to Canada, simply because an ancestor spent a short period here decades ago.
- It devalues Canadian citizenship by extending automatic eligibility to those with no meaningful ties or obligations to the country.
- Reasonable amendments requiring language proficiency, security screening, or even a recent, demonstrable connection to Canada were rejected.
- It embeds a post-national ideology that strips away any notion of core Canadian identity or responsibility.
- It expands IRCC’s discretionary power while simultaneously reducing the standards for citizenship acquisition.
- It creates new “lost Canadians” by destabilizing existing statuses and introducing a vague, abusable “substantial connection” test.
- It imposes enormous future costs on Canadians through new administrative burdens, litigation, and generational claims.
This is not responsible lawmaking. It is a radical restructuring of Canadian citizenship disguised as a remedy for a narrow court ruling.
The responsibility for this bill, its legal fragility, its rushed process, its ideological overreach, and its long-term consequences rests with those who choose to advance it. Canadians deserve clarity, not chaos; stability, not experimentation; and competent governance, not political theatre.
You now have full knowledge of the constitutional, procedural, and societal consequences of Bill C-3. If you continue to support this bill in its current form, you will be knowingly endorsing a measure that weakens citizenship, destabilizes Canada’s identity, and harms the very people you were elected to serve. Advancing it anyway would be a betrayal of your duty and of Canadians themselves. You are now on notice.
Respectfully,
[Your Name], Concerned Canadian
Read more details on Bill C-3 HERE: https://stand4thee.com/
EMAIL LETTER TO COPY AND PASTE:
SUBJECT LINE: Bill C-3 Constitutional, Procedural, and Public-Interest Failures
Minister Diab,
I am writing to express serious and urgent concerns about Bill C-3, a bill that threatens the integrity of Canadian citizenship, undermines national identity, and was advanced through Parliament on a foundation of legal ambiguity, political haste, and procedural negligence.
You are already aware that Bill C-3 is being justified on the basis of the Bjorkquist et al. v. Attorney General of Canada ruling (2023 ONSC 7152). What Canadians have not been told is this:
Bjorkquist was not a Supreme Court or appellate decision; it came from a single judge of the Ontario Superior Court.
The ruling declared the first-generation limit unconstitutional and suspended invalidity for six months, which expired in June 2024 and was extended FIVE times since then.
The government had clear options: appeal, seek clarification, or submit a reference to the Supreme Court, these are the established processes when dealing with questions of national policy, citizenship, and constitutional rights.
Instead, the government chose not to appeal, creating artificial urgency and using the suspended deadline as political pressure to force a rushed bill through Parliament.
This was a political choice, not a legal necessity. Other governments have appealed similar lower-court rulings to ensure clarity and stability as seen in Carter, Truchon, and other major constitutional cases. The refusal to appeal Bjorkquist abandoned that principle and set the stage for the legislative chaos now unfolding.
Because of that failure, Bill C-3 is being rammed through with limited debate, overturned amendments, shallow committee hearings, and virtually no opportunity for Canadians to understand the consequences. Even the Senate has acknowledged the government’s pattern of exploiting court deadlines to bypass sober second thought.
Beyond procedural misconduct, the substance of Bill C-3 is deeply flawed:
- It opens the door to chain migration, enabling citizenship claims from people with no real connection to Canada, simply because an ancestor spent a short period here decades ago.
- It devalues Canadian citizenship by extending automatic eligibility to those with no meaningful ties or obligations to the country.
- Reasonable amendments requiring language proficiency, security screening, or even a recent, demonstrable connection to Canada were rejected.
- It embeds a post-national ideology that strips away any notion of core Canadian identity or responsibility.
- It expands IRCC’s discretionary power while simultaneously reducing the standards for citizenship acquisition.
- It creates new “lost Canadians” by destabilizing existing statuses and introducing a vague, abusable “substantial connection” test.
- It imposes enormous future costs on Canadians through new administrative burdens, litigation, and generational claims.
This is not responsible lawmaking. It is a radical restructuring of Canadian citizenship disguised as a remedy for a narrow court ruling.
The responsibility for this bill, its legal fragility, its rushed process, its ideological overreach, and its long-term consequences rests with those who choose to advance it. Canadians deserve clarity, not chaos; stability, not experimentation; and competent governance, not political theatre.
You now have full knowledge of the constitutional, procedural, and societal consequences of Bill C-3. If you continue to support this bill in its current form, you will be knowingly endorsing a measure that weakens citizenship, destabilizes Canada’s identity, and harms the very people you were elected to serve. Advancing it anyway would be a betrayal of your duty and of Canadians themselves. You are now on notice.
Respectfully,
[Your Name], Concerned Canadian
Forwarded from Stand4THEE National Chat (COFOUNDER)
Link to recipient email addresses:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eR9nPHfUrP9sje5_dMwj_TYmndPd1QP4xiHmAgIxQP4/edit?usp=sharing
Check out my live for the readers digest version of this BIG update on Bill C-3:
https://rumble.com/v71sxaw-bill-c-3-update-and-mpsenate-letter.html
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eR9nPHfUrP9sje5_dMwj_TYmndPd1QP4xiHmAgIxQP4/edit?usp=sharing
Check out my live for the readers digest version of this BIG update on Bill C-3:
https://rumble.com/v71sxaw-bill-c-3-update-and-mpsenate-letter.html
Stand4THEE
Stand4THEE is an action based alliance of patriots focused on creating a better world following 4 pillars; Action, Unity, Integrity and Empowerment.
Stand4THEE pinned «‼️‼️BILL C-3 GOING TO THE SENATE FOR FINAL READING THURS, NOV 20TH!!!‼️‼️ Read more details on Bill C-3 HERE: https://stand4thee.com/ EMAIL LETTER TO COPY AND PASTE: SUBJECT LINE: Bill C-3 Constitutional, Procedural, and Public-Interest Failures Minister…»