Forwarded from Batndwn
I just heard that George Bush will not be speaking at the conference I’ve been attending with my mom. People were lined up outside the center for blocks.
His doctor told him not to come to Tennessee because he got sick.
I guess that is possible.
I’m kind of annoyed now, tho, bcs they’ll have some special music or something to replace him and I elected not to come. And regardless, security is tight (and I don’t know why).
Something very off going on here.
His doctor told him not to come to Tennessee because he got sick.
I guess that is possible.
I’m kind of annoyed now, tho, bcs they’ll have some special music or something to replace him and I elected not to come. And regardless, security is tight (and I don’t know why).
Something very off going on here.
President Trump is speaking now https://www.youtube.com/live/v3XUrvtB4H0
YouTube
LIVE: President Trump Holds a Rally in Kalispell, MT - 10/14/26
Join RSBN LIVE as we give you exclusive on the ground coverage of President Trump's Rally in Kalispell, Montana.
Tune in at 6 pm EDT on October 14, 2026.
10% Off Everything at All Family Pharmacy
Use code: RSBN10
https://allfamilypharmacy.com/rsbn
Learn…
Tune in at 6 pm EDT on October 14, 2026.
10% Off Everything at All Family Pharmacy
Use code: RSBN10
https://allfamilypharmacy.com/rsbn
Learn…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Eloquence by Tore Says
Fluent, warm, well-timed speech is a skill, not proof of character or goodwill.
Attractive delivery creates a halo; consistency, behavior under pressure, and how someone treats people who can’t replay them are better tests than tone.
https://x.com/GiulioAnselmo/status/2110488635510272359
Fluent, warm, well-timed speech is a skill, not proof of character or goodwill.
Attractive delivery creates a halo; consistency, behavior under pressure, and how someone treats people who can’t replay them are better tests than tone.
https://x.com/GiulioAnselmo/status/2110488635510272359
ToreSays®+ pinned «I am upset. I looked back on the posts. For three days almost nobody said anything. Then I saw the responses to the admin who posted. Then I saw in about half an hour a coordinated group of members showed up and treated the admins like they have no value in…»
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hey @Huntington_Bank you debanked me a few years ago because you didn’t like my “politics” now you are officially under investigation for fraud. 🔥🤏💅. Where are the funds going? Who’s the unit that debanked people?
Bet me it’s the same unit.
Bet me it’s the same unit.
When IO’s target a shared experience or narrative, subtle criticisms typically surface first as a means of testing engagement and shifting tone. Direct confrontation is unnecessary. Controlled exposure is sufficient to reveal the structure already in place.
The situation is permitted to develop without preemptive management of every reaction. Observation then focuses on who elects to enter once an opening appears. Participants in these operations rarely remain limited to low level critique. Some intervene after the fact under a protective framing, positioning themselves as reasonable while introducing additional criticism that advances the broader objective. Others escalate into more aggressive tactics once attention has concentrated on the point of conflict. They amplify public criticism, coordinate additional voices to reinforce the preferred frame, or recast the original experience as evidence of a larger problem requiring intervention. Both the measured and the escalated approaches tend to expose the same underlying pattern: an organized interest in undermining an experience or narrative that falls outside the operation’s control.
Proximity is maintained through limited engagement so the coordination and the contempt have less room to remain ambiguous. Continued observation clarifies the distinction. Authentic disagreement does not require a moment of vulnerability or a manufactured opening to appear. Opportunistic criticism, delayed moral positioning, and coordinated escalation do. Once that difference is evident, the interventions are treated as indicators of the operation’s objectives rather than as substantive feedback. The pattern is allowed to become visible without further accommodation. With the structure and the motive clear, the experience can be protected by declining to negotiate with actors whose primary interest was in the opening itself.
The situation is permitted to develop without preemptive management of every reaction. Observation then focuses on who elects to enter once an opening appears. Participants in these operations rarely remain limited to low level critique. Some intervene after the fact under a protective framing, positioning themselves as reasonable while introducing additional criticism that advances the broader objective. Others escalate into more aggressive tactics once attention has concentrated on the point of conflict. They amplify public criticism, coordinate additional voices to reinforce the preferred frame, or recast the original experience as evidence of a larger problem requiring intervention. Both the measured and the escalated approaches tend to expose the same underlying pattern: an organized interest in undermining an experience or narrative that falls outside the operation’s control.
Proximity is maintained through limited engagement so the coordination and the contempt have less room to remain ambiguous. Continued observation clarifies the distinction. Authentic disagreement does not require a moment of vulnerability or a manufactured opening to appear. Opportunistic criticism, delayed moral positioning, and coordinated escalation do. Once that difference is evident, the interventions are treated as indicators of the operation’s objectives rather than as substantive feedback. The pattern is allowed to become visible without further accommodation. With the structure and the motive clear, the experience can be protected by declining to negotiate with actors whose primary interest was in the opening itself.
Forwarded from DeAnn S
This is a true testament to the fact that our wonderful president listens to his people. Write him letters if you're concerned about something, he really listens. Thank you God for our leader who really cares about We the people 🙏🏼
Forwarded from Insider Paper
JUST IN - FBI and Postal Service are investigating letters with 'suspicious substances' sent to congressional and election offices — AP