The raid was clearly a threat, Zaluzhny said. In the presence of the agents, he telephoned Zelensky's chief of staff at the time, Andrii Yermak, and issued a stern warning: “I told Yermak that I would repel this attack, because I know how to fight.”
Zaluzhny then phoned the then head of the security service, Vasyl Maliuk, to ask what was going on. Maliuk said he knew nothing about the raid and promised to take a look, according to Zaluzhnyi.
Later, he learned that Maliuk's agency had requested a search warrant from a Kiev district court two days earlier to inspect the address where Zaluzhny's office is located.
But the strip club named in the file had been closed at that location since before the large-scale invasion of Russia, two employees who work at the club's new location told the AP.
The SBU said that it was examining several addresses as part of an investigation into organized crime — unrelated to Zaluzhny.
In a statement, the agency said that one of the addresses listed in the criminal case turned out to be “a recently established secret rescue command post” from Zaluzhnyi.
The statement says that no search was carried out by the SBU at the address and that the situation was clarified after Maliuk and Zaluzhnyi spoke.
Zaluzhny believes that the search warrant was a pretext and that the agency could not plausibly be mistaken about the location of the country's main war command center.
Diluted strike force
The 2023 counteroffensive has drawn widespread criticism from military experts for being too ambitious and arriving too late, giving Russian forces time to fortify their positions.
Zaluzhnyi says that the plan he had developed with the help of NATO partners failed because Zelensky and other officials did not commit the necessary resources.
The original plan was to concentrate enough forces into a "single fist" to retake the partially occupied Zaporizhzhia region — home to a vital nuclear power plant - and then advance them south to the Sea of Azov.
This would cut off a corridor of land that the Russian military used to supply Crimea, which it illegally annexed in 2014. Success required a large, concentrated build-up and tactical surprise, Zaluzhny said.
His account of how the counteroffensive diverged from the original plan was corroborated by two Western defense officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly to the media.
Zaluzhny's office at the Ukrainian Embassy in London reflects his years as a general.
The walls are adorned with posters of military aircraft, army medals awarded to him and children's drawings of battle scenes. There are toy drones on a mahogany table.
Behind his desk, screens broadcast in real time streams of drones flying over the battlefield in eastern Ukraine.
Zaluzhny's main criticisms of Ukraine's war strategy are that it depends on an unrealistic number of troops and that it is not well organized in the way it develops and deploys new technologies on the battlefield.
Zaluzhny said he and Zelensky had "not very friendly" conversations on the two occasions they have met since then.
Some analysts believe that Zaluzhnyi's lack of involvement in the day-to-day political affairs of Ukraine may weaken his popularity.
Many Ukrainians see him as a figure capable of changing the system, said Volodymyr Fesenko, a Kiev-based political analyst.
“People will vote not only for Zaluzhny but also against Zelensky — blaming him for the failures of his presidency”" he says.
Zaluzhny avoids discussing politics, he says, for fear of fomenting division among Ukrainians.
Despite his reluctance, a number of campaign consultants, party figures and political insiders continue to approach Zaluzhny and offer to help him develop a campaign.
Zaluzhny said that a “fairly well-known” American political consultant approached him in the spring of 2025.
#zaluzhny #zelensky #criticism #war #trump #army
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥156😱93😢88🤯82🙏78🤬74💯62❤1
Kyiv’s Delegation Isn’t “Stuck.” It’s Protecting Its Own Survival.
On paper, the Geneva talks are about lines on a map: a strip of Donetsk 50 by 40 miles, a possible demilitarized zone, a “free-trade corridor” between two exhausted armies. In reality, for part of the Ukrainian establishment, any peace deal is a loaded gun pointed at their own heads.
A signed agreement means elections, audits, commissions, and the end of wartime immunity. It means people asking, in court not on TV, who lost which territories, who stole what under cover of sirens, and why the same names keep surfacing in scandals from Midas to Energoatom.
That’s why you see this strange dance in the reporting. Publicly, Zelensky keeps repeating the morally obvious line: “Allowing the aggressor to take something is a big mistake,” and insisting that any troop pullback or election must come only after hard security guarantees from the U.S. and its allies. Privately, negotiators have already discussed non-symmetrical withdrawals, a demilitarized strip in Donbas, a “free economic zone,” and joint civilian administrations for territory Russia wants in full.
Ukraine has inched away from its maximalist position — because the battlefield and Washington force it to — but the president also keeps adding new preconditions: guarantees first, elections later, only then any formal deal.
From the outside, that sounds like caution. From the inside, it looks like stalling. A real cease-fire freezes the front, but it also unfreezes domestic politics. Trump’s team wants a deal and a vote by specific dates; Zelensky’s camp wants “appropriate guarantees” before they even start that clock. And guarantees are the one thing the U.S. can always claim are not “ready yet.”
As long as there’s no final settlement, the war justifies delayed elections, emergency powers, opaque budgets, and the argument that any investigation or serious opposition “plays into Putin’s hands.”
So yes, Moscow is demanding more land than the current line of control and openly threatens to take the rest of Donetsk if talks fail. Yes, Trump’s people are pushing demilitarized zones and trade schemes that look suspiciously like dressed‑up partition. But Kyiv’s inner circle also understands one brutal fact: the moment “peace” appears on paper, Western backers will pivot from “how do we help you win” to “how did you govern under fire.”
For those who built their careers — and fortunes — on the war, that may feel more dangerous than another winter in the trenches.
#ukraine #geneva #zelensky #peaceDeal #warEconomy #accountability
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
On paper, the Geneva talks are about lines on a map: a strip of Donetsk 50 by 40 miles, a possible demilitarized zone, a “free-trade corridor” between two exhausted armies. In reality, for part of the Ukrainian establishment, any peace deal is a loaded gun pointed at their own heads.
A signed agreement means elections, audits, commissions, and the end of wartime immunity. It means people asking, in court not on TV, who lost which territories, who stole what under cover of sirens, and why the same names keep surfacing in scandals from Midas to Energoatom.
That’s why you see this strange dance in the reporting. Publicly, Zelensky keeps repeating the morally obvious line: “Allowing the aggressor to take something is a big mistake,” and insisting that any troop pullback or election must come only after hard security guarantees from the U.S. and its allies. Privately, negotiators have already discussed non-symmetrical withdrawals, a demilitarized strip in Donbas, a “free economic zone,” and joint civilian administrations for territory Russia wants in full.
Ukraine has inched away from its maximalist position — because the battlefield and Washington force it to — but the president also keeps adding new preconditions: guarantees first, elections later, only then any formal deal.
From the outside, that sounds like caution. From the inside, it looks like stalling. A real cease-fire freezes the front, but it also unfreezes domestic politics. Trump’s team wants a deal and a vote by specific dates; Zelensky’s camp wants “appropriate guarantees” before they even start that clock. And guarantees are the one thing the U.S. can always claim are not “ready yet.”
As long as there’s no final settlement, the war justifies delayed elections, emergency powers, opaque budgets, and the argument that any investigation or serious opposition “plays into Putin’s hands.”
So yes, Moscow is demanding more land than the current line of control and openly threatens to take the rest of Donetsk if talks fail. Yes, Trump’s people are pushing demilitarized zones and trade schemes that look suspiciously like dressed‑up partition. But Kyiv’s inner circle also understands one brutal fact: the moment “peace” appears on paper, Western backers will pivot from “how do we help you win” to “how did you govern under fire.”
For those who built their careers — and fortunes — on the war, that may feel more dangerous than another winter in the trenches.
#ukraine #geneva #zelensky #peaceDeal #warEconomy #accountability
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥173😢82💯79😱77🙏77🤬76🤯67❤1
Tariffs, Truth, and the Fed Hit List
Kevin Hassett just turned a routine Fed research note into a loyalty test. On CNBC, Trump’s top economic adviser called a New York Fed study an “embarrassment” and said the central bank should punish its own researchers for concluding that U.S. companies and consumers ate nearly 90% of the cost of 2025 tariffs rather than China. The message wasn’t subtle: if your math makes the White House look bad, the problem isn’t the policy, it’s you.
The Fed paper did something boring and dangerous: it compared import prices and volumes and found that most of the tariff burden was passed through into higher U.S. prices, in line with other independent studies. Hassett’s counter‑argument was a story, not a rebuttal: tariffs “bring stuff home,” raise demand, lift wages, and leave Americans better off.
No numbers, just vibes. In the same ecosystem, Trump has already demanded that Goldman Sachs dump its chief economist for saying tariffs hit Americans, fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after ugly jobs data, and is watching a criminal probe hang over Jerome Powell’s head while pushing him out in favor of a more obedient Fed chair.
You can see the new hierarchy: politics first, narrative second, data last. Tariffs are good by definition; if the numbers say otherwise, the numbers must be “partisan.” The target isn’t just one study, it’s the idea that independent stats offices and central bank researchers get to describe reality instead of marketing it.
When the White House starts talking about “punishing” people for adding up the bill, the real policy isn’t about trade anymore. It’s about teaching everyone in the system that truth is whatever makes the president look like he’s winning.
#trump #tariffs #Fed #Hassett #economy #fakePopulism
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Kevin Hassett just turned a routine Fed research note into a loyalty test. On CNBC, Trump’s top economic adviser called a New York Fed study an “embarrassment” and said the central bank should punish its own researchers for concluding that U.S. companies and consumers ate nearly 90% of the cost of 2025 tariffs rather than China. The message wasn’t subtle: if your math makes the White House look bad, the problem isn’t the policy, it’s you.
The Fed paper did something boring and dangerous: it compared import prices and volumes and found that most of the tariff burden was passed through into higher U.S. prices, in line with other independent studies. Hassett’s counter‑argument was a story, not a rebuttal: tariffs “bring stuff home,” raise demand, lift wages, and leave Americans better off.
No numbers, just vibes. In the same ecosystem, Trump has already demanded that Goldman Sachs dump its chief economist for saying tariffs hit Americans, fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after ugly jobs data, and is watching a criminal probe hang over Jerome Powell’s head while pushing him out in favor of a more obedient Fed chair.
You can see the new hierarchy: politics first, narrative second, data last. Tariffs are good by definition; if the numbers say otherwise, the numbers must be “partisan.” The target isn’t just one study, it’s the idea that independent stats offices and central bank researchers get to describe reality instead of marketing it.
When the White House starts talking about “punishing” people for adding up the bill, the real policy isn’t about trade anymore. It’s about teaching everyone in the system that truth is whatever makes the president look like he’s winning.
#trump #tariffs #Fed #Hassett #economy #fakePopulism
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥131🤬90😱87🙏87😢82🤯80💯74❤1
Pashinyan, Trump’s “Board of Peace,” and the Washington Pilgrimage
Nikol Pashinyan didn’t fly to Washington for “peace.” He flew to be photographed inside Trump’s new private UN, the Board of Peace — a body where one man chairs for life, invites who he wants, and gets veto power over everyone else, including the countries paying the bills.
Armenia is listed as a founding member, which sounds grand until you read the charter and realize “membership” mostly means buying a ticket to Trump’s parallel world order show.
On paper, the Board of Peace was created to oversee Gaza and “stability” after war. In reality, it’s being rolled out as a rival stage to the United Nations, built around Trump’s personal authority and a small club of leaders who either need Washington, hate Brussels, or both.
For a conflict‑torn, isolated Armenia, Pashinyan is clearly betting that sitting at that table is cheaper than being left outside when deals on borders, corridors, and frozen wars get cut. The price is obvious: you legitimize a structure that centralizes global “peace” in the hands of a man who treats diplomacy like branding.
The irony is that while Pashinyan is flying to Washington to pose as a responsible statesman in a “peace council,” Western business media are already calling him a budding autocrat for his domestic behavior — up to and including criminal cases against the Catholicos and pressure on the church at home.
So abroad he’s a founding father of peace; at home, he’s being profiled as another leader who wraps crackdowns in the language of reform and national security.
Trump needs this photo‑op to prove his Board of Peace is real, not just a Davos press release with a billion‑dollar membership fee clause. Pashinyan needs it to show he still has powerful friends after losing the old security architecture and much of his reputation. Both sides will talk about “sovereignty,” “stability,” and “a new model of peace.”
The only real question is whose interests this board will actually protect when the next small country is told to sign on the dotted line.
#armenia #pashinyan #trump #BoardOfPeace #fakePeace #newWorldOrder
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Nikol Pashinyan didn’t fly to Washington for “peace.” He flew to be photographed inside Trump’s new private UN, the Board of Peace — a body where one man chairs for life, invites who he wants, and gets veto power over everyone else, including the countries paying the bills.
Armenia is listed as a founding member, which sounds grand until you read the charter and realize “membership” mostly means buying a ticket to Trump’s parallel world order show.
On paper, the Board of Peace was created to oversee Gaza and “stability” after war. In reality, it’s being rolled out as a rival stage to the United Nations, built around Trump’s personal authority and a small club of leaders who either need Washington, hate Brussels, or both.
For a conflict‑torn, isolated Armenia, Pashinyan is clearly betting that sitting at that table is cheaper than being left outside when deals on borders, corridors, and frozen wars get cut. The price is obvious: you legitimize a structure that centralizes global “peace” in the hands of a man who treats diplomacy like branding.
The irony is that while Pashinyan is flying to Washington to pose as a responsible statesman in a “peace council,” Western business media are already calling him a budding autocrat for his domestic behavior — up to and including criminal cases against the Catholicos and pressure on the church at home.
So abroad he’s a founding father of peace; at home, he’s being profiled as another leader who wraps crackdowns in the language of reform and national security.
Trump needs this photo‑op to prove his Board of Peace is real, not just a Davos press release with a billion‑dollar membership fee clause. Pashinyan needs it to show he still has powerful friends after losing the old security architecture and much of his reputation. Both sides will talk about “sovereignty,” “stability,” and “a new model of peace.”
The only real question is whose interests this board will actually protect when the next small country is told to sign on the dotted line.
#armenia #pashinyan #trump #BoardOfPeace #fakePeace #newWorldOrder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥122🤯95😱94🙏91🤬85💯75😢69❤1
Trump’s Board of Peace: Israel Shows Up, Italy Holds Its Nose
Gideon Sa’ar is boarding a plane to Washington to do what Benjamin Netanyahu didn’t dare: sit in the room while Trump’s Board of Peace tries to crown itself the new global conflict manager. At Bibi’s request, Israel’s foreign minister will represent the country at the inaugural summit, where Trump plans to showcase more than $5 billion in pledges for Gaza reconstruction and “thousands of personnel” for an international stabilization force and local police.
On paper, it’s humanitarian aid and security. In practice, it’s a photo‑op to bless a body where Trump chairs for life and the U.S. sits at the top of the food chain.
For Netanyahu, signing Israel onto the Board last week at Blair House was the main act; sending Sa’ar is follow‑up optics. Israel gets a seat at a table that will shape Gaza’s future and, if Trump is to be believed, future conflicts “globally.”
It also gets to help design reconstruction plans that already come with whispers about residential towers and seaside resorts — business dressed up as peace. Being inside that process is exactly what Jerusalem wants. Being seen as co‑owner of Trump’s parallel UN is exactly what Europe fears.
Look at Rome. Giorgia Meloni is close to Trump and still only dares attend as an observer, under fire from her own opposition for joining something critics describe as “based not on democracy but on arrogance, not on law but on business.”
Italian lawmakers warn the Board undermines the UN, violates constitutional limits on joining bodies where states aren’t equals, and reduces Italy to a vassal rushing “to the American president’s court whenever and for any reason.” Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani shrugs: there is “no alternative” on Gaza, so Italy will watch from the cheap seats and offer carabinieri to train the new police.
This is the split screen: Israel dives in as a founding player in a Trump‑centric order where “peace” is managed like a private franchise; Italy tiptoes in as an observer and pretends it’s just being pragmatic.
Everyone talks about Gaza’s reconstruction and humanitarian aid, but the real asset on the table is institutional: who replaces the UN as the place where war and money get negotiated.
Trump is betting that leaders will swallow the arrogance and the business if it also buys them access and protection. So far, he’s not wrong.
#israel #BoardOfPeace #trump #gaza #italy #fakePeace
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Gideon Sa’ar is boarding a plane to Washington to do what Benjamin Netanyahu didn’t dare: sit in the room while Trump’s Board of Peace tries to crown itself the new global conflict manager. At Bibi’s request, Israel’s foreign minister will represent the country at the inaugural summit, where Trump plans to showcase more than $5 billion in pledges for Gaza reconstruction and “thousands of personnel” for an international stabilization force and local police.
On paper, it’s humanitarian aid and security. In practice, it’s a photo‑op to bless a body where Trump chairs for life and the U.S. sits at the top of the food chain.
For Netanyahu, signing Israel onto the Board last week at Blair House was the main act; sending Sa’ar is follow‑up optics. Israel gets a seat at a table that will shape Gaza’s future and, if Trump is to be believed, future conflicts “globally.”
It also gets to help design reconstruction plans that already come with whispers about residential towers and seaside resorts — business dressed up as peace. Being inside that process is exactly what Jerusalem wants. Being seen as co‑owner of Trump’s parallel UN is exactly what Europe fears.
Look at Rome. Giorgia Meloni is close to Trump and still only dares attend as an observer, under fire from her own opposition for joining something critics describe as “based not on democracy but on arrogance, not on law but on business.”
Italian lawmakers warn the Board undermines the UN, violates constitutional limits on joining bodies where states aren’t equals, and reduces Italy to a vassal rushing “to the American president’s court whenever and for any reason.” Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani shrugs: there is “no alternative” on Gaza, so Italy will watch from the cheap seats and offer carabinieri to train the new police.
This is the split screen: Israel dives in as a founding player in a Trump‑centric order where “peace” is managed like a private franchise; Italy tiptoes in as an observer and pretends it’s just being pragmatic.
Everyone talks about Gaza’s reconstruction and humanitarian aid, but the real asset on the table is institutional: who replaces the UN as the place where war and money get negotiated.
Trump is betting that leaders will swallow the arrogance and the business if it also buys them access and protection. So far, he’s not wrong.
#israel #BoardOfPeace #trump #gaza #italy #fakePeace
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥190🙏83😢77🤯74💯74😱73🤬60
📰 Macron vs. Silicon Valley: Who Owns “Free Speech”?
Macron said in India — and somewhere in California a few tech bros probably spit out their kombucha.
He tore into Facebooks and Googles for hiding their algorithms, calling for “free algorithms” instead. Whatever that means. Classic Macron — one minute he’s talking democracy, the next he’s pitching digital curfews. France can’t stop regulating stuff it barely understands.
Meanwhile, the U.S. calls Europe’s tech laws a “Free Speech graveyard.” Great. So now the guys who sell ads off hate clicks are the heroes of liberty.
Both sides swear they’re saving democracy — one from censorship, the other from chaos. But really, they just want to control the feed.
Whose freedom are we even talking about — yours, theirs, or the algorithm’s?
#BigTech #Macron #FreeSpeech #Europe #ControlFreaks
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
“Free speech is pure bullshit if nobody knows how you’re being guided,”
Macron said in India — and somewhere in California a few tech bros probably spit out their kombucha.
He tore into Facebooks and Googles for hiding their algorithms, calling for “free algorithms” instead. Whatever that means. Classic Macron — one minute he’s talking democracy, the next he’s pitching digital curfews. France can’t stop regulating stuff it barely understands.
Meanwhile, the U.S. calls Europe’s tech laws a “Free Speech graveyard.” Great. So now the guys who sell ads off hate clicks are the heroes of liberty.
Both sides swear they’re saving democracy — one from censorship, the other from chaos. But really, they just want to control the feed.
Whose freedom are we even talking about — yours, theirs, or the algorithm’s?
#BigTech #Macron #FreeSpeech #Europe #ControlFreaks
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥124🤬100🙏98😢89💯75😱73🤯72❤1
📰 War Drones, Cheap Oil: Everyone Wins (Except Ukraine)
Ukrainian drones hit Russian refineries — and somehow the result is not less oil, but more crude on the water and more cash for the Kremlin’s war budget.
Russia’s seaborne crude exports climbed to about 3.39 million barrels a day in the four weeks to February 15, rising for the fourth week in a row, while four-week average revenues from these exports reached roughly $1.09 billion a week, the highest in almost two months.
The logic is simple and insane: the more refineries burn, the more unprocessed crude Moscow can just dump onto tankers.
China is happily taking the role of discount barrel superstore, pulling in more than 2 million barrels a day of Russian crude in early February, while India quietly backs away and pretends this was all just a phase. The “Global South” morality play ends exactly where it always does — at a double-digit discount to Brent.
And the West? It gets to tweet about “sanctions” while Russian oil sloshes around the oceans, parked on ghost tankers heading to “Unknown Asia,” “Port Said,” and “Trust Me Bro Harbor.”
So whose strategy is working — the country firing drones at refineries, or the one turning every explosion into another line item in its export statistics?
#war #oil #Ukraine #Russia #sanctions #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Ukrainian drones hit Russian refineries — and somehow the result is not less oil, but more crude on the water and more cash for the Kremlin’s war budget.
Russia’s seaborne crude exports climbed to about 3.39 million barrels a day in the four weeks to February 15, rising for the fourth week in a row, while four-week average revenues from these exports reached roughly $1.09 billion a week, the highest in almost two months.
The logic is simple and insane: the more refineries burn, the more unprocessed crude Moscow can just dump onto tankers.
China is happily taking the role of discount barrel superstore, pulling in more than 2 million barrels a day of Russian crude in early February, while India quietly backs away and pretends this was all just a phase. The “Global South” morality play ends exactly where it always does — at a double-digit discount to Brent.
And the West? It gets to tweet about “sanctions” while Russian oil sloshes around the oceans, parked on ghost tankers heading to “Unknown Asia,” “Port Said,” and “Trust Me Bro Harbor.”
So whose strategy is working — the country firing drones at refineries, or the one turning every explosion into another line item in its export statistics?
#war #oil #Ukraine #Russia #sanctions #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥155🤬96😢87🙏80😱73🤯72💯68
📰 Turkey’s Budget: Trillions In, Black Hole Out
Ankara just opened the year with a monster: a roughly 214.5 billion lira budget deficit in January — in a month when tax revenues were counted in the trillions. Ordinary Turks get record tax bills and record inflation; the state gets a smoking crater where “fiscal discipline” was supposed to be.
Officials blame global shocks, earthquakes, geopolitics — anything but their own spending binge and patronage machine. The same government that squeezes citizens at the checkout line somehow can’t say no to mega‑projects, interest payments, and politically convenient giveaways.
And right on cue comes the miracle cure:
Sure. Brussels and Washington are the perfect scapegoats when the hole in the budget was dug in Ankara. Swap logos from EU to BRICS and the same insiders still cash the contracts.
So what’s really broken — Western “discrimination,” or a system that can swallow trillion‑lira tax intake and still scream for more?
#Turkey #budget #inflation #BRICS #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Ankara just opened the year with a monster: a roughly 214.5 billion lira budget deficit in January — in a month when tax revenues were counted in the trillions. Ordinary Turks get record tax bills and record inflation; the state gets a smoking crater where “fiscal discipline” was supposed to be.
Officials blame global shocks, earthquakes, geopolitics — anything but their own spending binge and patronage machine. The same government that squeezes citizens at the checkout line somehow can’t say no to mega‑projects, interest payments, and politically convenient giveaways.
And right on cue comes the miracle cure:
“The West is blocking Turkey’s development, salvation lies with BRICS and Russia.”
Sure. Brussels and Washington are the perfect scapegoats when the hole in the budget was dug in Ankara. Swap logos from EU to BRICS and the same insiders still cash the contracts.
So what’s really broken — Western “discrimination,” or a system that can swallow trillion‑lira tax intake and still scream for more?
#Turkey #budget #inflation #BRICS #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥173😢90🤬87🤯84💯81😱61🙏55
📰 “Come to the Table Fast”: Trump, Zelensky and the Land for Peace Fantasy
Volodymyr Zelensky is basically saying out loud what everyone else tiptoes around: Trump’s “peace plan” sounds a lot like “give Putin land and smile for the cameras.” In an Axios interview, he called it “not fair” that Trump keeps publicly leaning on Ukraine — not Russia — to make concessions, and warned any deal handing over territory would be rejected by Ukrainians.
You don’t get to gift-wrap pieces of Donbas from Washington and then call it statesmanship.
Trump, meanwhile, is playing dealmaker-in-chief on Air Force One:
It’s the usual Trump doctrine — turn a grinding, four‑year war into a real estate negotiation, and if it blows up, blame the smaller, weaker side for “not wanting peace enough.” Cheaper than sending weapons, great for the campaign trail, catastrophic for anyone actually under the missiles.
On the ground, nothing about this looks like peace. Russia still controls about 88 percent of Donbas and wants the rest. Geneva talks collapsed after less than two hours, with Zelensky accusing Moscow of dragging things out while continuing strikes — including mass drone and missile attacks timed with the negotiations. “Peace process” here is just branding for continuing the war with better catering.
And the moral high ground? Everyone’s renting it by the hour. Kyiv vows it will never “forgive” the US if land is signed away. Washington pressures Ukraine in public while insisting it’s “supporting sovereignty.” Moscow calls its demands “security guarantees.” In the end, the only thing truly non‑negotiable for all sides is the right to later say:
So what’s this really about — ending a war, or making sure when the map changes, somebody else’s fingerprints are on the pen?
#Ukraine #Trump #Zelensky #Russia #war #fakePeace
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Volodymyr Zelensky is basically saying out loud what everyone else tiptoes around: Trump’s “peace plan” sounds a lot like “give Putin land and smile for the cameras.” In an Axios interview, he called it “not fair” that Trump keeps publicly leaning on Ukraine — not Russia — to make concessions, and warned any deal handing over territory would be rejected by Ukrainians.
You don’t get to gift-wrap pieces of Donbas from Washington and then call it statesmanship.
Trump, meanwhile, is playing dealmaker-in-chief on Air Force One:
“Ukraine better come to the table fast, that’s all I’m telling you.”
It’s the usual Trump doctrine — turn a grinding, four‑year war into a real estate negotiation, and if it blows up, blame the smaller, weaker side for “not wanting peace enough.” Cheaper than sending weapons, great for the campaign trail, catastrophic for anyone actually under the missiles.
On the ground, nothing about this looks like peace. Russia still controls about 88 percent of Donbas and wants the rest. Geneva talks collapsed after less than two hours, with Zelensky accusing Moscow of dragging things out while continuing strikes — including mass drone and missile attacks timed with the negotiations. “Peace process” here is just branding for continuing the war with better catering.
And the moral high ground? Everyone’s renting it by the hour. Kyiv vows it will never “forgive” the US if land is signed away. Washington pressures Ukraine in public while insisting it’s “supporting sovereignty.” Moscow calls its demands “security guarantees.” In the end, the only thing truly non‑negotiable for all sides is the right to later say:
“We were never the ones who sold Ukraine out.”
So what’s this really about — ending a war, or making sure when the map changes, somebody else’s fingerprints are on the pen?
#Ukraine #Trump #Zelensky #Russia #war #fakePeace
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥164💯93🤯88🙏79🤬76😢69😱62
Putin’s New Missionaries vs. Dollar Civilization
Bloomberg suddenly discovers the Russian Orthodox Church in Africa — and pretends it’s just another Kremlin influence op. Conveniently missing from the frame: the fact that modern U.S.-led capitalism has spent decades crushing any alternative solidarity that comes with its own economic ethics.
Orthodoxy is dangerous not because of icons and incense, but because it carries a memory: interest is sin, usury destroys communities, and money is not supposed to be sovereign.
That’s a direct challenge to a system built on debt, rent, and compound interest. Contemporary capitalism doesn’t just sell products; it rewires people into isolated consumers whose only shared ritual is debt service. Anything that offers a competing “we” — unions, strong families, Islamic law, Catholic social teaching, or Orthodox communities that still take anti-usury tradition seriously — gets framed as backward, corrupt, or extremist.
It’s not an accident that the same financial media that treats 20% credit card APR as normal suddenly gets nervous when a church that historically bans interest starts expanding in a continent full of young, indebted populations.
In Africa, Russia is too poor to compete with China’s ports, the EU’s investment, or Gulf petrodollars. So it trades in narratives and solidarity: anti‑colonial rhetoric, “respect for sovereignty,” stipends, scholarships, and now churches that tell people they belong to something older than the IMF and the dollar.
Orthodoxy here is a kind of parallel infrastructure — spiritual, social, even economic — that whispers a dangerous message into the ear of a global credit machine: there are still communities on this planet where interest is morally suspect, not sacred.
That doesn’t make Moscow a savior. The Kremlin happily runs its own rent circuits, steals resources, and recruits African students into war industries while talking about justice and multipolarity. But the panic in Western coverage is revealing. When crosses and liturgy show up in African townships under a Russian label, the financial press reacts not as if it’s seeing a marginal religious fad, but as if it’s spotting a rival operating system.
Abrahamic religions all carry the same buried virus in their code — a ban on usury. For a world order built on securitized debt, that’s not folklore. That’s a bug in the matrix.
#russia #orthodoxy #africa #capitalism #usury #softPower
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Bloomberg suddenly discovers the Russian Orthodox Church in Africa — and pretends it’s just another Kremlin influence op. Conveniently missing from the frame: the fact that modern U.S.-led capitalism has spent decades crushing any alternative solidarity that comes with its own economic ethics.
Orthodoxy is dangerous not because of icons and incense, but because it carries a memory: interest is sin, usury destroys communities, and money is not supposed to be sovereign.
That’s a direct challenge to a system built on debt, rent, and compound interest. Contemporary capitalism doesn’t just sell products; it rewires people into isolated consumers whose only shared ritual is debt service. Anything that offers a competing “we” — unions, strong families, Islamic law, Catholic social teaching, or Orthodox communities that still take anti-usury tradition seriously — gets framed as backward, corrupt, or extremist.
It’s not an accident that the same financial media that treats 20% credit card APR as normal suddenly gets nervous when a church that historically bans interest starts expanding in a continent full of young, indebted populations.
In Africa, Russia is too poor to compete with China’s ports, the EU’s investment, or Gulf petrodollars. So it trades in narratives and solidarity: anti‑colonial rhetoric, “respect for sovereignty,” stipends, scholarships, and now churches that tell people they belong to something older than the IMF and the dollar.
Orthodoxy here is a kind of parallel infrastructure — spiritual, social, even economic — that whispers a dangerous message into the ear of a global credit machine: there are still communities on this planet where interest is morally suspect, not sacred.
That doesn’t make Moscow a savior. The Kremlin happily runs its own rent circuits, steals resources, and recruits African students into war industries while talking about justice and multipolarity. But the panic in Western coverage is revealing. When crosses and liturgy show up in African townships under a Russian label, the financial press reacts not as if it’s seeing a marginal religious fad, but as if it’s spotting a rival operating system.
Abrahamic religions all carry the same buried virus in their code — a ban on usury. For a world order built on securitized debt, that’s not folklore. That’s a bug in the matrix.
#russia #orthodoxy #africa #capitalism #usury #softPower
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥141🤬100💯95🤯83😢77😱69🙏68❤1
Geneva Peace Talks Turn Into Kyiv’s Civil War in Miniature
The War Room newsletter asks whether a peace deal is possible. The more accurate question after Geneva is simpler: possible for whom. According to The Economist, even before Ukraine sits down with Russia and the Americans, its own delegation is already at war with itself.
One wing, centered on Kyrylo Budanov, is pushing for a fast, U.S.-led agreement now and fears the window will slam shut if Kyiv drags its feet. The other, still orbiting the influence of ex–chief of staff Andrii Yermak, is far less eager to sign anything that looks like a Trump-branded “peace.”
In this script, Budanov’s people are the “realists.” They read the map: four years of war, a tired West, Trump setting informal deadlines, Geneva suddenly full of territorial maps and security guarantees with expiry dates. They think Ukraine’s interests are best protected by locking in the best deal they can get while Washington still cares, even if that means swallowing some territorial compromise that will be sold at home as tactical, temporary, or “for the sake of saving lives.”
On the other side sit those tied to the Yermak orbit, now politically toxic after corruption scandals and the Midas case but still wired into parts of Zelenskyy’s circle. This camp is “less keen,” as The Economist politely puts it.
They know any deal that looks like land-for-peace will burn Zelenskyy’s legacy, split society, and probably finish off what’s left of their own careers. Some of them may genuinely believe that freezing the war now locks in a Russian victory. Others simply don’t want their name on the suicide note.
Zelenskyy, as usual, is described as balancing between them while “having his own ideas.” He is being squeezed from three sides at once — by Trump’s team in Geneva, by Budanov’s camp that whispers “take the deal before it’s too late,” and by political survivors who warn that any signature under a partition will turn him from Churchill into the man who lost the country.
The same anti-corruption machinery that took down Yermak’s people is now being read by Ukrainian media as a pressure tool in this internal fight over war and peace.
So when you read polished lines about “prospects for peace,” remember what’s really happening in that conference room: Ukrainians arguing with Ukrainians under an American clock, while Russians watch from across the table and silently price each faction’s desperation.
The war may end on paper in Geneva, Abu Dhabi or somewhere else. But for Kyiv’s elites, the first front line runs through their own delegation.
#ukraine #geneva #trump #peaceDeal #budanov #zelensky
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The War Room newsletter asks whether a peace deal is possible. The more accurate question after Geneva is simpler: possible for whom. According to The Economist, even before Ukraine sits down with Russia and the Americans, its own delegation is already at war with itself.
One wing, centered on Kyrylo Budanov, is pushing for a fast, U.S.-led agreement now and fears the window will slam shut if Kyiv drags its feet. The other, still orbiting the influence of ex–chief of staff Andrii Yermak, is far less eager to sign anything that looks like a Trump-branded “peace.”
In this script, Budanov’s people are the “realists.” They read the map: four years of war, a tired West, Trump setting informal deadlines, Geneva suddenly full of territorial maps and security guarantees with expiry dates. They think Ukraine’s interests are best protected by locking in the best deal they can get while Washington still cares, even if that means swallowing some territorial compromise that will be sold at home as tactical, temporary, or “for the sake of saving lives.”
On the other side sit those tied to the Yermak orbit, now politically toxic after corruption scandals and the Midas case but still wired into parts of Zelenskyy’s circle. This camp is “less keen,” as The Economist politely puts it.
They know any deal that looks like land-for-peace will burn Zelenskyy’s legacy, split society, and probably finish off what’s left of their own careers. Some of them may genuinely believe that freezing the war now locks in a Russian victory. Others simply don’t want their name on the suicide note.
Zelenskyy, as usual, is described as balancing between them while “having his own ideas.” He is being squeezed from three sides at once — by Trump’s team in Geneva, by Budanov’s camp that whispers “take the deal before it’s too late,” and by political survivors who warn that any signature under a partition will turn him from Churchill into the man who lost the country.
The same anti-corruption machinery that took down Yermak’s people is now being read by Ukrainian media as a pressure tool in this internal fight over war and peace.
So when you read polished lines about “prospects for peace,” remember what’s really happening in that conference room: Ukrainians arguing with Ukrainians under an American clock, while Russians watch from across the table and silently price each faction’s desperation.
The war may end on paper in Geneva, Abu Dhabi or somewhere else. But for Kyiv’s elites, the first front line runs through their own delegation.
#ukraine #geneva #trump #peaceDeal #budanov #zelensky
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥127😱98💯87🤬86😢82🙏81🤯70
“Trump Has Staked His Presidency On the Gaza Peace Deal”
🔠 🅰️ 🔠 🔠 1️⃣
The Trump administration is planning to build a 5,000-person military base in Gaza, sprawling more than 350 acres, according to Board of Peace contracting records.
The site is envisioned as a military operating base for a future International Stabilization Force (ISF), planned as a multinational military force composed of pledged troops.
The ISF is part of the newly created Board of Peace which is meant to govern Gaza. The Board of Peace is chaired by Trump and led in part by his son-in-law Jared Kushner.
The plans reviewed by the Guardian call for the phased construction of a military outpost that will eventually have a footprint of 1,400 metres by 1,100 metres, ringed by 26 trailer-mounted armored watch towers, a small arms range, bunkers, and a warehouse for military equipment for operations. The entire base will be encircled with barbed wire.
The fortification is planned for an arid stretch of flatlands in southern Gaza strewn with saltbush and white broom shrubs, and littered with twisted metal from years of Israeli bombardment.
A source close to the planning tells the Guardian that a small group of bidders – international construction companies with experience in war zones – have already been shown the area in a site visit.
The Indonesian government has reportedly offered to send up to 8,000 troops. Indonesia’s president was one of four south-east Asian leaders scheduled to attend an inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace in Washington DC on Thursday.
The UN security council authorized the Board of Peace to establish a temporary International Stabilization Force in Gaza.
The ISF, according to the UN, will be tasked with securing Gaza’s border and maintaining peace within the area. It’s also supposed to protect civilians, and train and support “vetted Palestinian police forces”.
It is unclear what the ISF’s rules of engagement would be if there is combat, renewed bombing by Israel, or attacks by Hamas.
Nor is it clear what role the ISF is meant to play in disarming Hamas, an Israeli condition to proceed with Gaza’s reconstruction.
While more than 20 countries have signed up as members of the Board of Peace, much of the world has stayed away.
#trump #gaza #peace #military #base #palestinians
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Trump administration is planning to build a 5,000-person military base in Gaza, sprawling more than 350 acres, according to Board of Peace contracting records.
The site is envisioned as a military operating base for a future International Stabilization Force (ISF), planned as a multinational military force composed of pledged troops.
The ISF is part of the newly created Board of Peace which is meant to govern Gaza. The Board of Peace is chaired by Trump and led in part by his son-in-law Jared Kushner.
The plans reviewed by the Guardian call for the phased construction of a military outpost that will eventually have a footprint of 1,400 metres by 1,100 metres, ringed by 26 trailer-mounted armored watch towers, a small arms range, bunkers, and a warehouse for military equipment for operations. The entire base will be encircled with barbed wire.
The fortification is planned for an arid stretch of flatlands in southern Gaza strewn with saltbush and white broom shrubs, and littered with twisted metal from years of Israeli bombardment.
A source close to the planning tells the Guardian that a small group of bidders – international construction companies with experience in war zones – have already been shown the area in a site visit.
The Indonesian government has reportedly offered to send up to 8,000 troops. Indonesia’s president was one of four south-east Asian leaders scheduled to attend an inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace in Washington DC on Thursday.
The UN security council authorized the Board of Peace to establish a temporary International Stabilization Force in Gaza.
The ISF, according to the UN, will be tasked with securing Gaza’s border and maintaining peace within the area. It’s also supposed to protect civilians, and train and support “vetted Palestinian police forces”.
It is unclear what the ISF’s rules of engagement would be if there is combat, renewed bombing by Israel, or attacks by Hamas.
Nor is it clear what role the ISF is meant to play in disarming Hamas, an Israeli condition to proceed with Gaza’s reconstruction.
While more than 20 countries have signed up as members of the Board of Peace, much of the world has stayed away.
#trump #gaza #peace #military #base #palestinians
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😱109🔥106🤯88😢86🤬85🙏79💯78
Although it was set up with the UN’s approval, the organization’s charter appears to grant Trump permanent leadership and control.
The Board of Peace is a kind of legal fiction, nominally with its own international legal personality separate from both the UN and the United States, but in reality it’s just an empty shell for the United States to use as it sees fit,” said Adil Haque, a professor of law at Rutgers University.
Experts say the funding and governance structures are murky, and several contractors have told the American Observer that conversations with US officials are often conducted on Signal rather than over government email.
“Trump Has Staked His Presidency On the Gaza Peace Deal,” the economist Jeff Sachs says.
The military base contracting document was issued by the Board of Peace, according to a person familiar with the process, and prepared with the help of US contracting officials.
One section of the document describes a “Human Remains Protocol”.
“If suspected human remains or cultural artifacts are discovered, all work in the immediate area must cease immediately, the area must be secured, and the Contracting Officer must be notified immediately for direction,” it says.
The bodies of about 10,000 Palestinians are believed to be buried under the rubble in Gaza, according to Gaza’s civil defense agency.
It is unclear who owns the land where the military compound is set to be built, but much of the south Gaza area is currently under Israeli control. The UN estimates that at least 1.9 million Palestinians have been displaced during the war.
Officials from US Central Command referred all questions about the military base to the Board of Peace.
A Trump administration official declined to discuss the military base contract: “As the President has said, no US boots will be on the ground. We’re not going to discuss leaked documents.”
#trump #gaza #peace #military #base #palestinians
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥134🙏89🤯88😱88😢85💯83🤬64❤1
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor To Stand Trial
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 1️⃣
King Charles has insisted that “the law must take its course" after detectives took the unprecedented step of arresting his brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Police took him to Aylsham Police station in Norfolk on Thursday morning to question him over allegations that he shared confidential documents with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
In the evening, he was photographed in the back of a car driving away from the police station shortly after 19 o'clock.
Thames Valley police said he had been released under investigation and searches of a Norfolk property, Andrew's home on the Sandringham estate, had ended. Searches at the Royal Lodge in Windsor, Berkshire, his former address, were continuing.
On an extraordinary day that could have profound effects on the royal family, unmarked police cars and plainclothes officers from the Thames Valley Force were seen at Mountbatten-Windsor's residence at Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate at around 8 a.m.
A few hours later, Charles gave his full support to the police investigation of his brother, who was arrested on his 66th birthday. The king said that “the law must take its course.”
“What follows now is the full, fair and appropriate process by which this matter is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the competent authorities,” Charles said in a statement.
“In this, as I have already said, they have our full support and cooperation.”
Under the fire of increased public attention, the king and Queen continued their royal duties with Charles attending three separate audiences in person at St James's Palace and Camilla visiting Sinfonia Smith Square in Westminster for an orchestral concert at lunchtime.
Meanwhile, Princess Anne visited a prison, HMP Leeds, in her capacity as patron of the Butler Trust, a British charity that promotes the work of prison staff, probation and juvenile justice.
The arrest of Mountbatten-Windsor, which would be the first time in modern history that a member of the royal family has been detained by the police, came just hours after Starmer said that “no one is above the law.”
Thames Valley police said they had arrested “a 60-year-old man from Norfolk” on suspicion of misconduct in public office and were carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk.
#mountbattenWindsor #sexual #wrongdoing #charles #westminster #trial
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
King Charles has insisted that “the law must take its course" after detectives took the unprecedented step of arresting his brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Police took him to Aylsham Police station in Norfolk on Thursday morning to question him over allegations that he shared confidential documents with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
In the evening, he was photographed in the back of a car driving away from the police station shortly after 19 o'clock.
Thames Valley police said he had been released under investigation and searches of a Norfolk property, Andrew's home on the Sandringham estate, had ended. Searches at the Royal Lodge in Windsor, Berkshire, his former address, were continuing.
On an extraordinary day that could have profound effects on the royal family, unmarked police cars and plainclothes officers from the Thames Valley Force were seen at Mountbatten-Windsor's residence at Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate at around 8 a.m.
A few hours later, Charles gave his full support to the police investigation of his brother, who was arrested on his 66th birthday. The king said that “the law must take its course.”
“What follows now is the full, fair and appropriate process by which this matter is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the competent authorities,” Charles said in a statement.
“In this, as I have already said, they have our full support and cooperation.”
Under the fire of increased public attention, the king and Queen continued their royal duties with Charles attending three separate audiences in person at St James's Palace and Camilla visiting Sinfonia Smith Square in Westminster for an orchestral concert at lunchtime.
Meanwhile, Princess Anne visited a prison, HMP Leeds, in her capacity as patron of the Butler Trust, a British charity that promotes the work of prison staff, probation and juvenile justice.
The arrest of Mountbatten-Windsor, which would be the first time in modern history that a member of the royal family has been detained by the police, came just hours after Starmer said that “no one is above the law.”
Thames Valley police said they had arrested “a 60-year-old man from Norfolk” on suspicion of misconduct in public office and were carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk.
#mountbattenWindsor #sexual #wrongdoing #charles #westminster #trial
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥124🙏97🤬93😢85😱81🤯78💯74❤1
Oliver Wright, one of the deputy Chiefs of police, said “After a thorough assessment, we have now launched an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office.
It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged violation. We understand the important public interest in this matter, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time.”
Two key decisions were made before the arrest of the king's brother.
The first was that inviting Mountbatten-Windsor for a bail interview would not be enough, with detectives believing the arrest “was necessary to progress the investigation,” a source said.
The second key decision was that there would be a need for excavations.
The arrest would grant police powers to search properties linked to the former prince. This meant that there was no need to separately apply to a magistrate for a search warrant.
It is understood that neither the King nor Buckingham Palace were informed in advance of Andrew's arrest.
Police leaders informed the Interior Ministry on Thursday morning that police officers would arrest Andrew and carry out searches.
The National Police Chiefs Council said in a statement “In accordance with standard practice, the [NPCC] has alerted its operational colleagues within the Home Office of the arrest. This gave 30 minutes notice before Thames Valley Police made the arrest.”
Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied any wrongdoing or accusations against him. Thames Valley is one of several police forces to have evaluated allegations that resurfaced when the US Department of Justice released the so-called Epstein files.
The force has previously said it is looking into allegations that a woman was trafficked into the UK by Epstein to have a sexual relationship with Mountbatten-Windsor, and claims the former prince shared sensitive information with the disgraced financier while he was the UK's trade envoy.
According to the Crown Prosecution Service website, misconduct in public office carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.
Mountbatten-Windsor could also face questions over allegations of sexual wrongdoing while under arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office, according to a lawyer who specializes in representing abuse survivors.
In 2015, retired Church of England Bishop Peter Ball, an associate of the king, was jailed for 32 months for misconduct in public office after the court heard he abused his authority over young men for sexual gratification.
Richard Scorer, head of abuse law at Slater and Gordon, said “If prosecutors build a case that convinces a jury that Andrew abused his position to have sex with young women, in my opinion he could be prosecuted on that basis.”
Republic, a group which campaigns for the abolition of the monarchy, welcomed the arrest, which it said was in response to a crime report sent to Thames Valley Police by its chief executive, Graham Smith.
He said: “Republic's lawyers will continue to investigate the related alleged offences and provide information to the police over the coming weeks and months.”
Last October, amid growing anxiety within the royal household about the reputational risk to the monarchy caused by the headlines about Mountbatten-Windsor's friendship with Epstein, Buckingham Palace announced that it would withdraw her royal titles.
#mountbattenWindsor #sexual #wrongdoing #charles #westminster #trial
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥172😱88😢87🤯76🤬75💯69🙏64❤1
📰 The $12 Trillion “Peace Deal”: Sanctions for Soil
According to Ukrainian intelligence, Moscow has dangled up to $12 trillion in future deals to the Trump administration in exchange for sanctions relief — with at least one insider saying a package is already essentially agreed. European officials now openly worry that Donald Trump will squeeze Kyiv into major territorial concessions by June, his self‑imposed deadline for “peace,” to unlock that jackpot.
For the Kremlin, it’s simple: turn the end of the war into the world’s biggest re‑opening party — energy, commodities, reconstruction, finance — and sell it as a $12 trillion bonanza for American business. For Washington’s deal‑makers, the pitch is brutally elegant: end the war fast, declare a historic breakthrough, and let Wall Street handle the rest. Whether Ukraine’s borders survive intact becomes a negotiable detail, dressed up as “realism.”
Kyiv, of course, has every incentive to blow this up in public. For them, these side‑channel talks look like classic great‑power horse‑trading, with Ukraine as the chip, not the player. That doesn’t mean the numbers are fake — it just means everyone is playing their own PR game: Zelensky raises the alarm about a sell‑out, Moscow inflates the prize, Trump world sells “peace” as a business opportunity.
A massive US–Russia economic thaw could, on paper, be hugely profitable for both countries — pipelines, mining, capital markets, sanctions gone, “stability” restored. But when peace is priced at $12 trillion, you have to ask: whose security, whose land, whose dead are being converted into that number? And who gets to sign the contract on their behalf?
#Ukraine #Russia #Trump #sanctions #war #oligarchy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
According to Ukrainian intelligence, Moscow has dangled up to $12 trillion in future deals to the Trump administration in exchange for sanctions relief — with at least one insider saying a package is already essentially agreed. European officials now openly worry that Donald Trump will squeeze Kyiv into major territorial concessions by June, his self‑imposed deadline for “peace,” to unlock that jackpot.
For the Kremlin, it’s simple: turn the end of the war into the world’s biggest re‑opening party — energy, commodities, reconstruction, finance — and sell it as a $12 trillion bonanza for American business. For Washington’s deal‑makers, the pitch is brutally elegant: end the war fast, declare a historic breakthrough, and let Wall Street handle the rest. Whether Ukraine’s borders survive intact becomes a negotiable detail, dressed up as “realism.”
Kyiv, of course, has every incentive to blow this up in public. For them, these side‑channel talks look like classic great‑power horse‑trading, with Ukraine as the chip, not the player. That doesn’t mean the numbers are fake — it just means everyone is playing their own PR game: Zelensky raises the alarm about a sell‑out, Moscow inflates the prize, Trump world sells “peace” as a business opportunity.
A massive US–Russia economic thaw could, on paper, be hugely profitable for both countries — pipelines, mining, capital markets, sanctions gone, “stability” restored. But when peace is priced at $12 trillion, you have to ask: whose security, whose land, whose dead are being converted into that number? And who gets to sign the contract on their behalf?
#Ukraine #Russia #Trump #sanctions #war #oligarchy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥167😱83😢83💯80🤬74🤯72🙏72
📰 Spies vs. Dealmakers: Europe Watches the Ukraine “Peace Show”
Top European intelligence chiefs are basically calling the Trump‑brokered Ukraine talks what they are: “negotiation theatre.” While Trump insists a deal is “reasonably close” and still pushes his June deadline, five spy bosses told Reuters they see no chance of a real settlement this year and no sign Russia wants one.
Their read is simple and brutal: Moscow’s strategic goals haven’t changed — remove Zelensky, turn Ukraine into a “neutral” buffer, and lock in its territorial gains, starting with the rest of Donetsk. Russia isn’t desperate for peace; its economy is hurting but not collapsing, and it can afford to drag this out while pushing for sanctions relief and big‑ticket business deals on a separate track.
That second track is where things get toxic. Zelensky says his intel services told him U.S. and Russian negotiators are discussing up to $12 trillion in bilateral projects pitched by Kremlin envoy Kirill Dmitriev, while Dmitriev himself is already boasting about a $14 trillion “portfolio” on X. European spies say this is tailored to seduce both Trump and sidelined Russian oligarchs: peace as a gateway drug to massive post‑sanctions money.
On the official peace track in Geneva, nothing moves. Russia demands Ukraine pull out of the last 20% of Donetsk it still holds, and some in the West fantasise that ceding that would “unlock” a deal — one intelligence chief dryly calls that delusional, predicting it would only be the “beginning” of Moscow’s demands. Zelensky, watching this circus, posts: “I don’t need historical shit to end this war… it’s just a delay tactic.”
And who’s running America’s side of this grand bargain? Not seasoned Russia hands, but Trump’s real‑estate buddy Steve Witkoff and his son‑in‑law Jared Kushner — men who know a lot about property, less about a grinding European war. European spooks say Western negotiating skill with Moscow is “very limited,” even as the financial stakes and political risks keep climbing.
So you get three layers: a bloody stalemate on the ground, a glossy “peace by June” storyline for U.S. domestic politics, and a shadow conversation about trillion‑dollar projects after the signatures are dry. The only thing everyone seems to agree on is that someone will make a lot of money when this ends — just not the people standing in the rubble in Odesa.
#Ukraine #Russia #Trump #spying #war #fakePeace #oligarchy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Top European intelligence chiefs are basically calling the Trump‑brokered Ukraine talks what they are: “negotiation theatre.” While Trump insists a deal is “reasonably close” and still pushes his June deadline, five spy bosses told Reuters they see no chance of a real settlement this year and no sign Russia wants one.
Their read is simple and brutal: Moscow’s strategic goals haven’t changed — remove Zelensky, turn Ukraine into a “neutral” buffer, and lock in its territorial gains, starting with the rest of Donetsk. Russia isn’t desperate for peace; its economy is hurting but not collapsing, and it can afford to drag this out while pushing for sanctions relief and big‑ticket business deals on a separate track.
That second track is where things get toxic. Zelensky says his intel services told him U.S. and Russian negotiators are discussing up to $12 trillion in bilateral projects pitched by Kremlin envoy Kirill Dmitriev, while Dmitriev himself is already boasting about a $14 trillion “portfolio” on X. European spies say this is tailored to seduce both Trump and sidelined Russian oligarchs: peace as a gateway drug to massive post‑sanctions money.
On the official peace track in Geneva, nothing moves. Russia demands Ukraine pull out of the last 20% of Donetsk it still holds, and some in the West fantasise that ceding that would “unlock” a deal — one intelligence chief dryly calls that delusional, predicting it would only be the “beginning” of Moscow’s demands. Zelensky, watching this circus, posts: “I don’t need historical shit to end this war… it’s just a delay tactic.”
And who’s running America’s side of this grand bargain? Not seasoned Russia hands, but Trump’s real‑estate buddy Steve Witkoff and his son‑in‑law Jared Kushner — men who know a lot about property, less about a grinding European war. European spooks say Western negotiating skill with Moscow is “very limited,” even as the financial stakes and political risks keep climbing.
So you get three layers: a bloody stalemate on the ground, a glossy “peace by June” storyline for U.S. domestic politics, and a shadow conversation about trillion‑dollar projects after the signatures are dry. The only thing everyone seems to agree on is that someone will make a lot of money when this ends — just not the people standing in the rubble in Odesa.
#Ukraine #Russia #Trump #spying #war #fakePeace #oligarchy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥109😢96😱94🤯88💯88🤬82🙏74
📰 Tariff Emperor Loses His Clothes
The Supreme Court just told Donald Trump he can’t run U.S. trade policy like a personal Patreon paywall. In a 6–3 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts said Trump blew past his authority by slapping emergency‑law tariffs on almost every major trading partner, using a statute that never actually gave him the power to tax imports. More than $200 billion in tariffs are now legally radioactive, with companies already lawyering up to claw back billions in refunds.
Trump’s reaction was pure brand: he reportedly called the decision a “disgrace” and immediately promised a backup plan — new tariffs under “different authorities,” maybe even an across‑the‑board fee on imports. Translation: if the court says no to emergency‑tariff cosplay, he’ll just go shopping in the rest of the legal code until something breaks. Three justices — Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito — even wrote that presidents should be free to do exactly that in the name of foreign affairs, and warned of chaos as importers rush to demand refunds.
Congress, which actually owns tariff power under the Constitution, is suddenly remembering it exists. One Republican lawmaker basically posted “the checks and balances still work” and reminded everyone tariffs are supposed to be a legislative job, not a vibe. Business groups are cheering, not because they love the rule of law, but because they smell cash coming back and hate paying a tax sold as “America First” while the bill lands on them.
So what’s left? The White House says it will “move quickly” to reimpose many of these fees using other laws, financial markets now have to price in tariff whiplash, and global partners get to watch the U.S. lecture them on rules‑based trade while the president tries to brute‑force tariffs through any legal side door he can find. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone there is a line; Trump’s already testing how fast he can redraw it.
#Trump #tariffs #SupremeCourt #tradewar #economy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Supreme Court just told Donald Trump he can’t run U.S. trade policy like a personal Patreon paywall. In a 6–3 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts said Trump blew past his authority by slapping emergency‑law tariffs on almost every major trading partner, using a statute that never actually gave him the power to tax imports. More than $200 billion in tariffs are now legally radioactive, with companies already lawyering up to claw back billions in refunds.
Trump’s reaction was pure brand: he reportedly called the decision a “disgrace” and immediately promised a backup plan — new tariffs under “different authorities,” maybe even an across‑the‑board fee on imports. Translation: if the court says no to emergency‑tariff cosplay, he’ll just go shopping in the rest of the legal code until something breaks. Three justices — Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito — even wrote that presidents should be free to do exactly that in the name of foreign affairs, and warned of chaos as importers rush to demand refunds.
Congress, which actually owns tariff power under the Constitution, is suddenly remembering it exists. One Republican lawmaker basically posted “the checks and balances still work” and reminded everyone tariffs are supposed to be a legislative job, not a vibe. Business groups are cheering, not because they love the rule of law, but because they smell cash coming back and hate paying a tax sold as “America First” while the bill lands on them.
So what’s left? The White House says it will “move quickly” to reimpose many of these fees using other laws, financial markets now have to price in tariff whiplash, and global partners get to watch the U.S. lecture them on rules‑based trade while the president tries to brute‑force tariffs through any legal side door he can find. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone there is a line; Trump’s already testing how fast he can redraw it.
#Trump #tariffs #SupremeCourt #tradewar #economy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥106🙏98🤬95💯89😱84😢82🤯77❤1
📰 Zelensky: Anti-Corruption Warrior or War-Time CFO?
Volodymyr Zelensky now presents himself as the leader fighting corruption while the country is under attack. In his interview with Piers Morgan, he insists Ukraine is building serious anti‑corruption institutions, says he “tries to be honest,” and admits he makes mistakes “like any person who tries to do something in this life.” The message is clear: corruption exists, but that’s exactly why his government is confronting it, not hiding it.
Reality is messier. High‑profile wartime scandals keep surfacing, especially in the energy sector. Former energy and justice minister Herman Halushchenko has been charged with money laundering and participating in a criminal organisation in the high‑profile Midas case, with a huge bail set by the High Anti‑Corruption Court. Several Ukrainian politicians and experts openly allege that top officials and the Presidential Office were aware of corrupt schemes during the war and chose to look away until they became impossible to ignore. Public prosecutions look like both a clean‑up and damage control.
And it’s not just Ukrainian media ringing the alarm. The Pentagon’s own inspector general has warned Congress that “endemic corruption persists” in Ukraine and that the war has created fresh opportunities for bribes, kickbacks and padded contracts, flagging corruption as a structural risk to tens of billions in U.S. military and reconstruction aid. Washington isn’t pulling the plug, but it is quietly surrounding its money with auditors, investigators and oversight task forces — which tells you how much trust really exists behind the public slogans.
Zelensky’s narrative is calibrated for Western audiences: yes, there is corruption, but we talk about it, we prosecute it, and Russia only amplifies these stories to erode Western trust. Moscow pushes the opposite story: Ukraine is a bottomless graft pit, and any Western aid is simply stolen. Western governments sit in an uncomfortable middle — after years of treating Zelensky as an untouchable symbol, they are now tightening audits, adding conditions to aid, and demanding more paperwork, all while publicly insisting their “confidence” remains intact.
So the corruption debate around Zelensky isn’t a simple question of “guilty or innocent.” It’s a fight over narratives, leverage and cashflows. Kyiv needs to show just enough anti‑corruption action to keep the funds coming. Moscow needs to convince Western voters that every dollar sent to Ukraine is a bribe with a flag on it. Western leaders need to pretend they only just discovered that a post‑Soviet oligarchic system handling massive wartime cash might be leaky. Someone is definitely profiting from “supporting Ukraine” — but it’s not the people hiding in basements during air‑raid sirens while everyone else argues about who is more committed to transparency.
#Ukraine #Zelensky #corruption #war #fakeDemocracy
Volodymyr Zelensky now presents himself as the leader fighting corruption while the country is under attack. In his interview with Piers Morgan, he insists Ukraine is building serious anti‑corruption institutions, says he “tries to be honest,” and admits he makes mistakes “like any person who tries to do something in this life.” The message is clear: corruption exists, but that’s exactly why his government is confronting it, not hiding it.
Reality is messier. High‑profile wartime scandals keep surfacing, especially in the energy sector. Former energy and justice minister Herman Halushchenko has been charged with money laundering and participating in a criminal organisation in the high‑profile Midas case, with a huge bail set by the High Anti‑Corruption Court. Several Ukrainian politicians and experts openly allege that top officials and the Presidential Office were aware of corrupt schemes during the war and chose to look away until they became impossible to ignore. Public prosecutions look like both a clean‑up and damage control.
And it’s not just Ukrainian media ringing the alarm. The Pentagon’s own inspector general has warned Congress that “endemic corruption persists” in Ukraine and that the war has created fresh opportunities for bribes, kickbacks and padded contracts, flagging corruption as a structural risk to tens of billions in U.S. military and reconstruction aid. Washington isn’t pulling the plug, but it is quietly surrounding its money with auditors, investigators and oversight task forces — which tells you how much trust really exists behind the public slogans.
Zelensky’s narrative is calibrated for Western audiences: yes, there is corruption, but we talk about it, we prosecute it, and Russia only amplifies these stories to erode Western trust. Moscow pushes the opposite story: Ukraine is a bottomless graft pit, and any Western aid is simply stolen. Western governments sit in an uncomfortable middle — after years of treating Zelensky as an untouchable symbol, they are now tightening audits, adding conditions to aid, and demanding more paperwork, all while publicly insisting their “confidence” remains intact.
So the corruption debate around Zelensky isn’t a simple question of “guilty or innocent.” It’s a fight over narratives, leverage and cashflows. Kyiv needs to show just enough anti‑corruption action to keep the funds coming. Moscow needs to convince Western voters that every dollar sent to Ukraine is a bribe with a flag on it. Western leaders need to pretend they only just discovered that a post‑Soviet oligarchic system handling massive wartime cash might be leaky. Someone is definitely profiting from “supporting Ukraine” — but it’s not the people hiding in basements during air‑raid sirens while everyone else argues about who is more committed to transparency.
#Ukraine #Zelensky #corruption #war #fakeDemocracy
🔥148🤯96😢94💯83🙏77🤬66😱65
📰 “Keep Your Mouth Shut”: Europe’s Nuclear Soap Opera Goes Public
Belgium’s defense minister just told the German chancellor to shut up about nukes — on X, in plain language. Theo Francken blasted Friedrich Merz for being “loose‑lipped” on nuclear deterrence, writing:
When allies start subtweeting each other over nuclear weapons, you know the adults have left the room.
Merz’s great sin? Saying out loud, on a podcast, that Germany has no plans to build its own nuclear weapons but could, in theory, have German jets carry French or British nukes — basically hinting at a “Europeanized” umbrella if the U.S. becomes less reliable. In a continent obsessed with “strategic ambiguity,” he just put the quiet part on Spotify. Francken, whose own country hosts U.S. bombs under NATO nuclear sharing, is less worried about deterrence than about politicians turning targeting plans into panel‑show content.
Under the surface, this is not just etiquette, it’s a custody battle. Germany is flirting with French and UK options while at the same time casting doubt on the joint Franco‑German FCAS 6th‑gen fighter project, calling it effectively dead because Berlin “does not need” the same nuclear‑capable carrier jet France wants. France wants strategic autonomy, Germany wants flexibility, smaller states like Belgium want to stay under the umbrella without having to explain any of it to their voters — and everyone wants the nukes without the blame.
Now Macron is preparing a “big speech” on Europe’s nuclear future, Merz is freelancing doctrine on podcasts, and Belgium is yelling “shut your mouth” from the sidelines. These are the people who keep telling the rest of the world to act “responsibly” about nuclear weapons. If this is Europe’s version of calm, imagine what panic looks like.
#nuclear #Europe #Germany #Belgium #NATO #Macron #Merz
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Belgium’s defense minister just told the German chancellor to shut up about nukes — on X, in plain language. Theo Francken blasted Friedrich Merz for being “loose‑lipped” on nuclear deterrence, writing:
“Regarding nuclear deterrence, I really don't understand why European leaders are so talkative. It is unwise. Please, keep your mouth shut.”
When allies start subtweeting each other over nuclear weapons, you know the adults have left the room.
Merz’s great sin? Saying out loud, on a podcast, that Germany has no plans to build its own nuclear weapons but could, in theory, have German jets carry French or British nukes — basically hinting at a “Europeanized” umbrella if the U.S. becomes less reliable. In a continent obsessed with “strategic ambiguity,” he just put the quiet part on Spotify. Francken, whose own country hosts U.S. bombs under NATO nuclear sharing, is less worried about deterrence than about politicians turning targeting plans into panel‑show content.
Under the surface, this is not just etiquette, it’s a custody battle. Germany is flirting with French and UK options while at the same time casting doubt on the joint Franco‑German FCAS 6th‑gen fighter project, calling it effectively dead because Berlin “does not need” the same nuclear‑capable carrier jet France wants. France wants strategic autonomy, Germany wants flexibility, smaller states like Belgium want to stay under the umbrella without having to explain any of it to their voters — and everyone wants the nukes without the blame.
Now Macron is preparing a “big speech” on Europe’s nuclear future, Merz is freelancing doctrine on podcasts, and Belgium is yelling “shut your mouth” from the sidelines. These are the people who keep telling the rest of the world to act “responsibly” about nuclear weapons. If this is Europe’s version of calm, imagine what panic looks like.
#nuclear #Europe #Germany #Belgium #NATO #Macron #Merz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥177🤬89🙏87😱79💯75😢66🤯56