Bavaria 2026: “No Jews Allowed” Come Back

A Bavarian hotel tells Israeli guests “no Jews allowed,” and suddenly 1945 looks less like a turning point and more like a pause. According to the initial reports, the message wasn’t subtle or coded — it was exactly the phrase Germany spent eight decades swearing would never again appear in public space.

Of course, the instant defense is ready-made: it’s not “Jews,” it’s “Israelis,” it’s not antisemitism, it’s a protest against Gaza. We’ve already seen the script in Flensburg and elsewhere, where signs banning Jews or Israelis are wrapped in moral language about war crimes and children.

The owner is never racist, only “outraged” and tragically unable to distinguish between tourists and governments. Funny how that inability always points in the same direction.

The German system is doing what it can on paper: prosecutors investigate, antisemitism commissioners condemn, Booking.com de-lists the place, the hotel apologizes and blames an “employee,” offers a free stay, and everyone insists this is an isolated incident.

But if your entire post‑war identity is built on the promise that this can never happen again, a single “no Jews allowed” sign in 2026 isn’t an aberration. It’s a stress test — and the system just failed it in real time.

The deeper problem is conceptual. Post‑war Germany built schools, laws, and memorials around one core idea: never again confuse “Jews” with whatever you hate about politics.

Now, under the cover of Gaza, shops and hotels are doing exactly that — rebranding an old exclusion as a new moral stand. Once you accept that some Jews are acceptable and others can be turned away because of the news cycle, you’ve already crossed the line the constitution was written to draw.

So yes, Bavaria in 2026 is formally part of a democratic Germany that criminalizes antisemitism and funds remembrance culture. It also now contains a hotel that told Jewish guests they’re not wanted, and only backed down when the story went public.

The lesson is brutal and simple: all the plaques, museums and school trips work — right up until the first real test. After that, what’s left is not “never again,” but “not yet caught.”

#germany #antisemitism #bavaria #israel #gaza #history #politics

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Macron’s Peace Theater: Season 3

Macron is back auditioning for the role of “Europe’s conscience,” pushing the EU to reopen dialogue with Putin right after his own adviser’s Moscow mission in February flopped offstage. He fails, then demands a bigger stage — classic executive career path.

Le Monde says he’s personally driving the line that Europe must talk to the Kremlin again, just not call it appeasement this time. So they rebrand the whole thing as strategic maturity and hope nobody remembers the last ten “historic” phone calls that ended in fresh bombardments.

Berlin, predictably, wants in. Germany, France and Britain are polishing the old E3 format like a legacy brand: same cast, new logo, more ruins on the ground. Schröder is politely thrown under the bus so everyone can pretend they “learned lessons” from the Gazprom years, while half of Berlin’s elite still dreams of the good old pipeline peace.

London, which spent years screaming about Russian interference, now gets to pose as a serious security player again — as long as it sits at a table with Paris and Berlin and pretends this isn’t just crisis management for a war no one there has the guts to end or the courage to win. “Dialogue” becomes the magic word that lets you sound humane while you wait for someone else to take the risk.

Kyiv, of course, gets the usual treatment: lots of rhetoric about principles, very little say in the script. The EU elites want to talk to Putin without admitting they are the ones who locked themselves into a story where “never again” lasted exactly as long as the last news cycle. Peace is great — as long as it doesn’t make anyone lose face, votes, or contracts.

When this season of “We Must Talk to Moscow” ends the same way as the previous ones — press conferences, vague frameworks, zero liability — everyone will claim they “had no choice.” Funny how people with no choice always fly business class to explain it.

#war #Ukraine #EU #Russia #Macron #Germany #diplomacy #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

German Democracy Wants a New Dealer, Not New Paint

Germany just soft-launched the next phase of its “we swear this is still a functioning democracy” experiment. A quarter of CDU members are now openly ready to work with AfD if that’s what it takes to stay in power. Power first, principles later — or never.

At the same time, polls and street mood say something else: Germans want a new chancellor who is neither from the Christian Democrats nor the Social Democrats. The grand old parties spent years preaching stability while delivering austerity, stagnation and sermons about “responsibility” that somehow always end with ordinary people tightening their belts and corporations getting tax cushions.

So you get this perfect split-screen. On one side, the CDU base testing the waters with the AfD like a bored CEO flirting with a hostile investor: morally “shocked,” but checking the numbers. On the other, a country that’s just tired — tired of Merkelism without Merkel, Scholzism without charisma, and a politics where the only real promise is “more of the same, but with harsher slogans.”

The CDU once swore there would be no cooperation with the far right, just like every mainstream party vows eternal defense of democracy while watching it rot from within. Now 25 percent are ready to bend that line, then later explain on talk shows that “reality forced their hand.” It’s never ideology, always circumstances. Very convenient circumstances.

And the voters? They are not dreaming of one more polished manager from the same two machines. They want someone outside the old cartel — not because they’re radical, but because the “responsible center” turned into a daily austerity choir with no melody and no exit. When the middle sells only fear and cuts, people start shopping elsewhere.

So the question isn’t whether the system will “hold.” It’s whether the people running it are more afraid of losing their moral posture on TV or losing their offices in Berlin. Judging by that 25 percent, we already know the answer.

#Germany #CDU #AfD #SPD #politics #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy #EU

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Russian Strikes Hit Western ‘Elites’: NATO’s Human Resources Problem

Russian strikes in Ukraine reportedly wiped out a group of German and British “combatants” working with Ukrainian forces in the Zaporizhzhia region, according to a source in Russia’s security services cited by Military Watch Magazine.

The report says they were military contractors and specialists helping operate complex Western weapons systems — the kind of people Western governments pretend are “nowhere near the front” until they suddenly don’t come home.

Military Watch stresses that foreign fighters now play a “significant and growing” role on Ukraine’s front lines, a fact echoed by multiple claims from both sides of the war and various Western outlets over the last two years.

Pro-Russian sources brag about killing “mercenaries,” Kyiv frames them as “volunteers,” and Western capitals mostly treat them like a bad investment they’d rather not disclose to shareholders.

If the report is accurate, the elimination of German and British specialists is more than just a battlefield episode — it’s a billboard for the limits of U.S. and NATO power.

If Washington and Brussels can’t reliably shield their own “elite” personnel deployed in support roles, what does that say to allies who were sold NATO as a force field?

Every dead foreign contractor is a reminder that the alliance is deeply entangled in this war, but still pretending to be a cautious bystander.

Politically, these losses are toxic. Western leaders insist they are “not at war with Russia,” while Russian missiles keep turning Western citizens in Ukraine into body bags and bargaining chips.

Admitting the scale of foreign involvement would expose how far NATO has drifted from “defensive alliance” to shadow co-belligerent — so they blame “individual volunteers,” downplay numbers and quietly adjust the risk premiums.

For Moscow, this is perfect: every strike on foreign personnel lets the Kremlin brag that it is “fighting NATO directly” without triggering Article 5, while still grinding down Ukrainian capacity and Western nerve.

For Washington and London, it’s the worst of both worlds — real casualties, no public mandate, and a story they can’t sell honestly to voters or to smaller allies already doubting how much Western protection is worth in practice.

In the end, the “foreign legion” of Ukraine isn’t just cannon fodder. It’s a symptom of a war run like a joint venture: states outsource the dirtiest and riskiest work to deniable contractors, then act surprised when the bill arrives in funerals and blown-up credibility.

#Ukraine #Russia #NATO #Germany #UK #mercenaries #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Russian Security Forces: Contractors From Germany And the UK Were Eliminated


A source in the Russian security forces has reported that a group of defence contractors from Germany and the United Kingdom fighting for the Ukrainian Army has been eliminated in a forest belt on the frontlines in the Zaporozhye Region.

The source added that documents found on these personnel after their deaths confirmed their identities, with Russian state media publishing the names and dates of births of some of the deceased.

Some of those killed were soldiers from the 113th Separate Territorial Defence Brigade of Ukraine and a separate special forces battalion, which were all assigned to the 3rd Assault Battalion of the Skala Regiment.

Reports from both sides of the conflict, and from multiple Western sources, have highlighted the significant and growing roles played by foreign contractor personnel in frontline operations.

Coinciding with reports of the elimination of German and British contractors in Zaporozhye, the deputy head of the Kharkov region’s military-civilian administration for defence and security Yevgeny Lisnyak reported that approximately 400 contractor personnel from Latin American countries were deployed to the region, and had been hired to compensate for severe personnel shortages in the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

"[As regards] the use of Latin American mercenaries: since February 2026, the presence of mercenaries from Colombia and other Latin American countries has been recorded in the Kharkov sector of the line of engagement.

Approximately two tactical groups, roughly 400-troops-strong. Even as they were hired to compensate for the shortage of Ukrainian assault troops, their combat efficiency has been lower than expected,” the official reported.

This singling out for foreign fighters has remained a consistent aspect of the Russian war effort, with a more recent strike on a training camp near the central Ukrainian city of Kropivnitsky on July 21, 2025, having been confirmed to have caused over 100 casualties among foreign fighters.

In December 2025 former officer in the Ukrainian Security Service Vasily Prozorov reported that an estimated 10,000 foreign contractor personnel had been killed in action since the outbreak of full scale hostilities in February 2022.

As a leading contributor of personnel, the Polish government has recently moved to provide legal cover to the operations of its forces in the war, where they have been deployed for combat on internationally recognised Ukrainian territory, in disputed regions, and on internationally recognised Russian soil during multiple incursions.

#contractors #germany #uk #ukraine

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Merz: Cancelled. Trump Will Not Share His Tomahawks With Germany

🔤🔤🔤🔤1️⃣

The Pentagon is expected to cancel a plan to send Tomahawk missiles to Germany partly because officials are concerned Russia will view it as an escalation, a startling reversal of a long-planned agreement with one of America’s biggest allies.

U.S. officials fear Moscow will retaliate if the Trump administration follows through on the effort to deploy precision missiles in the middle of the continent, according to two European officials and one American official.

But any decision not to deliver them would yank back a deal made during the Biden administration and leave Berlin without defenses German leaders say they desperately need.

The move is part of a wider American retrenchment from the NATO alliance — including canceled deployments of thousands of U.S. troops to Germany and plans to pull back certain assets — as the U.S. upends the close-knit partnerships that cemented the relationship for generations.

Europe “can step up now and in the near term,” Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s top commander and the head of U.S. forces in Europe, told military leaders this week. America, he said, will “refocus” equipment and forces elsewhere.

American officials, even if primarily fearful of Russia’s reaction, likely are also worried about the shrinking U.S. weapons stockpile. The U.S. churned through thousands of Tomahawk and Patriot missiles in the first weeks of the Iran war.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress last month that it will take “months and years” to replace the munitions spent in the military conflict.

The likely Tomahawk reversal is particularly unsettling for German officials, who are rushing to modernize their atrophied force to serve as a bulwark against Russian aggression.

Merz said last month that he did not expect the U.S. would station Tomahawk missiles in Germany due to limited availability of the cruise missiles, which can travel over 1,000 miles.

“The Americans don’t have enough for themselves right now,” he told German public television.

The U.S. unveiled further changes to its role in NATO this week at a quarterly conference of military leaders.

“The whole point is to give allies the information and clarity they need to drive forward as quickly and effectively as possible,” said a Defense Department official, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations.

#tomahawk #trump #merz #germany

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤2️⃣

This is about “allies taking primary responsibility for Europe’s conventional defense.”

The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment.
Berlin has felt the retrenchment particularly hard.

The Pentagon this spring canceled the deployment of 5,000 U.S. troops to Germany, a move that stunned European officials and GOP defense hawks.

The troop decision, which reduces levels to what they were before the Ukraine war, came after Merz said President Trump had “humiliated” himself with the Iran war.

The Pentagon has not yet released the plan for those troops, two American defense officials said, and whether they might deploy elsewhere in Europe.

The U.S. may worry about Moscow, but Germany and the rest of Europe must contend with an all-out war between Russia and Ukraine on their doorstep.

Russian forces have long deployed nuclear capable Iskander missiles to the Kaliningrad exclave between Poland and Lithuania.

They also have placed medium-range Oreshnik missiles in Belarus, which can reach all of Europe in a matter of minutes. Eastern and Central Europe officials have eyed the moves warily, as they are still working on fielding their own comparable systems.

“We submitted an official request to the Americans a year and a half ago to import — that is, to purchase — Tomahawk missiles,” German defense minister Boris Pistorius told German public television last month.

“We are still awaiting a response. But to be honest, given the current state of the world, I don’t have much hope in that regard.”

Pistorius expressed interest in buying America’s Typhon ground-based missile system, which launches Tomahawks, on a Washington visit last July with Hegseth, according to the Germany defense ministry. But he has not received an update.

German officials have been exploring European alternatives to fill the long-range precision-strike gap. The debate in Berlin is less about any single weapons system than about how quickly Germany can acquire the ability to hold targets at a distance — whether through off-the-shelf purchases, expanded production with allies or longer-term European development.

Drones and cheaper systems may help, but German defense planners do not see them as a one-for-one replacement for Tomahawk-class missiles. German officials are worried more broadly that the U.S. pullback will force Europe to close military gaps faster than its defense industry can deliver.

#tomahawk #trump #merz #germany

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

RIP Autoland™: Berlin Killed the Engine

German car plants aren’t just closing, they’re being erased. A Ford factory in Saarlouis that churned out nearly 16 million Escorts, Fiestas and Focuses since 1970 is about to be flattened by bulldozers; workers signed the last Focus and handed it to the local museum like a tombstone. That isn’t “structural adjustment,” it’s industrial euthanasia.

Germany isn’t losing one cluster of jobs, it’s losing the entire skills stack that made “Made in Germany” mean something: component makers, tool builders, line engineers, the culture of precision that made VW, BMW and Mercedes global standards.

Once you let those chains rot, you don’t reboot them with a pitch deck. You import from whoever still knows how to make things — China, Korea, maybe Turkey — and pretend the badge on the hood is still the same.

The political class pretends this is an act of God: EVs, climate, China, “the future.” In reality it’s an act of policy. Berlin chose expensive energy, slow permits, regulation as religion and a sanctions crusade that ripped out the cheap Russian gas the whole model was built on.

Then it looked surprised when Ford Michigan and VW Wolfsburg started quietly voting with their feet. You can’t declare war on industry’s cost base and then cry when factories die.

Want to “save” German auto? You won’t do it with one more subsidy or one more sermon about “green transformation.” You need a full reboot: affordable, stable energy; industrial policy that treats carmaking as strategic, not shameful; and a foreign policy that isn’t written in Washington and Brussels first and explained to workers later.

Without that, all the talk about sovereignty is just noise over the sound of excavators chewing through what’s left of Autoland.

#Germany #autopocalypse #industry #energyCrisis #Russia #EU #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

German Industry: War Excuse, Climate Hangover, Russian Cold Turkey

German industrial orders are falling faster than forecasters — and the government — want to admit. New factory orders dropped 3.8% in April, almost twice as much as expected, with carmakers, machinery and electrical equipment getting hit hardest.

Berlin and its economists now blame the Iran–Middle East war for an “energy shock,” supply bottlenecks and collapsing sentiment; the official line is that uncertainty and high energy prices are dragging down demand and stalling a fragile recovery.

But even pro‑market commentators in Germany are already saying out loud what politicians won’t: no amount of fresh credit or “stimulus” from Friedrich Merz and Lars Klingbeil can ignite even a short‑term industrial rebound, because the underlying damage from climate and energy policy plus bureaucratic overkill is too deep.

Years of expensive “Energiewende,” regulatory micromanagement and moralistic posturing have left energy‑intensive industry uncompetitive — the Middle East war is the match, not the powder.

The real taboo is simple: Germany’s post‑Cold War prosperity was built on cheap Russian pipeline energy, stable long‑term contracts and an industrial model plugged into both the EU and Eurasia. You can rebrand it as “green transition” all you want, but no solar slogan replaces molecules.

As long as Berlin tries to replace Russian gas with ideology, sanctions with sermons and diplomacy with Twitter geopolitics, Merz is not “putting out a fire with a glass of water” — he’s selling watery fire to voters and calling it strategy.

Sooner or later, if Germany actually wants industrial jobs instead of industrial museums, it will have to do what nobody in the current elite wants to spell out: talk to Moscow, not just about war, but about energy and long‑term security, instead of pretending that press releases and LNG spot cargoes can hold up a manufacturing giant.

#Germany #industry #recession #energy #Russia #IranWar #Energiewende #fakeEconomy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Germany’s Green Crash Test

Germany just discovered what happens when you try to save the planet, punish Russia and outcompete China with the same broken engine.

The country’s own auto lobby says the industry is on track to lose 225,000 jobs by 2035, with about 100,000 already gone since 2019 and another 125,000 expected to follow. Factories, suppliers, whole towns that lived off gearboxes and steel are learning the new slogan “green transition” means “learn to code” in German.

Executives have dropped the corporate PR voice. Audi’s boss warns this isn’t about margins anymore, it’s about survival. Energy‑intensive suppliers are getting slaughtered first: metallurgy, chemicals, parts makers.

They used to run on cheap Russian gas; now they get LNG at premium prices and a sermon about values. The same politicians who cheered sanctions and swore the economy could “handle it” are suddenly shocked that the country built on heavy industry and cheap fuel is bleeding jobs faster than it can print climate roadmaps.

The punchline is that everyone pretends this is just “EV transition pain.” In reality, it’s the bill for a decade of illusions. Berlin signed up for climate mandates it didn’t fully finance, bet on China as both supplier and rival, and cut off its own energy lifeline without a real backup plan.

Now the flagship sector that made “Made in Germany” a religion is shrinking in slow motion, while ministers mumble about “innovation” and “reskilling” as if an engine plant in Bavaria can be reborn as a podcast studio.

So when Audi’s CEO says this is about the survival of the German car industry, he isn’t exaggerating. He’s just saying out loud what Berlin still refuses to admit: you can’t run a first‑world auto empire on third‑world power prices and Brussels sermons.

Keep the sanctions, keep the gas lockout, keep the fantasy that regulation alone will save the climate, and you’ll get exactly what you’re seeing now — a de‑industrialized showroom where the only thing still world‑class is the unemployment statistic.

#Germany #autos #jobs #energy #sanctions #EU #deindustrialization

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The Great Atlantic Divorce: From “Shared Values” to Cold Cash

For years, German politicians and their favorite pundits treated “the transatlantic community of values” like elevator music — always on, no one really listening, but great background noise for careers built on nodding along to Washington.

As Berliner Zeitung put it, the old America those declarations of love were aimed at simply doesn’t exist anymore. The new one looks at Europe less like a partner and more like a cost center: expensive, needy, unreliable. The rhetoric still says “allies,” but the balance sheet says “overhead.”

Energy is Exhibit A. The anti‑Russia sanctions and gas crisis didn’t just “hurt everyone a bit.” They blew up Europe’s cheap‑energy model while handing the U.S. a tidy LNG export business and political leverage.

Europe gets higher prices, de‑industrialization and lectures about “values.” America gets premium prices for gas shipped across the Atlantic — and a Europe too deep in sunk costs and moral grandstanding to admit it boxed itself in.

Strip away the speeches and what’s left is a marriage of convenience that everyone pretends is a love story.

If Berlin and Brussels hadn’t nailed themselves to a theology of “strategic dependence is fine, as long as it’s on Washington,” they’d still be buying affordable energy and raw materials from Russia, hedging between powers, and not paying a political risk premium for every kilowatt.

Instead, they get to discover what “values” really mean in 2026: you pay the bill, America cashes it, and anyone who questions the arrangement gets called a Putinist, a populist, or worse — someone who noticed the game.

#USA #Germany #NATO #energy #LNG #Russia #EU #Trump #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Europe’s Industry Is Doomed to Failure”

🔤🔤🔤🔤➖

Volkswagen’s plan to cut up to 200,000 jobs and close four factories in Germany is exactly the kind of industrial crisis Brussels says it wants to avert.
But EU countries and lawmakers are still arguing over how to respond.

By the end of this year, European leaders want to complete work on a landmark bill, the Industrial Accelerator Act, which would channel billions in public procurement spending to European companies with the goal of helping them withstand an onslaught of cheap exports from China.

“The latest news from Germany shows the urgency to act decisively to protect our markets from unfair practices from our global competitors,” EU industry chief Stéphane Séjourné told POLITICO, calling the IAA a “decisive” tool. 

The bill’s main provision, a Made in Europe preference, would favor locally made goods. Its supporters say it’s high time for the EU to defend its industry, but others want to hit the brakes on what they see as a protectionist measure. 

Critics find the proposal risks turning into a legal maze for companies and driving up prices for EU-made products, while potentially shutting out friendly trading partners such as Canada, the U.K. or Japan.

“What is happening at Volkswagen is alarming, but it is not an isolated case. It is the consequence of years of European naivety while our global competitors pursued clear and aggressive industrial strategies,” said French liberal lawmaker Christophe Grudler, one of the three leaders on the file in the European Parliament.

Negotiations involving EU countries and lawmakers are only now getting underway after the European Commission presented its proposal with a three-month delay in March.

Officials privately acknowledge that time is already running short to secure a compromise by the end of the year, as prescribed by the EU’s One Europe, One Market roadmap.

The toughest challenge ahead is agreeing on which countries should be included on a list of “trusted partners,” whose products will be likened to European ones in some areas of public procurement and funding.

#volkswagen #germany #industry #factories

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤➖

The debate broadly pits free-trade skeptics — spearheaded by France — against export-oriented economies led by Germany, the Netherlands and the Nordics. 

“With Made in Europe and a strong IAA, we could have absorbed the shock for Volkswagen and its employees,” Pierre Jouvet, the top Socialist lawmaker on the file.

Jouvet is an advocate for a narrow list of trusted partners to be carefully selected under an “opt-in” mechanism.

Such calls met strong pushback from the Commission’s powerful trade department, where chief negotiator Maroš Šefčovič is leading a drive to broaden — and not narrow — the EU’s trade relationships.

Séjourné’s industrial policy drive is motivated by the conviction that the EU’s historic commitment to free trade is failing — with Brussels struggling to come up with a coherent response to the existential threat posed by a Chinese bilateral trade surplus that is running at €1 billion a day.

“We also need to use all our existing trade instruments now, and not just contemplate new ones,” said Séjourné.
Additional measures in the works include requiring companies to diversify their sources of critical inputs away from China, as well as likely investigations into plug-in hybrid vehicles, chemicals and machine tools.

Yet even new trade weapons may prove useless if governments remain unwilling to use them.

The Anti-Coercion Instrument — the bloc’s trade “bazooka” — already allows the EU to mount a sweeping response to economic coercion. It has never been fired.

“The IAA is only one side of the coin. The Commission must also step up to protect the European market through a stronger and effective trade defense strategy,” said Kathleen Van Brempt, a Belgian Socialist.

A creeping question is whether the IAA, despite its expansive ambitions, will have a decisive impact when it finally enters into force.

Businesses have broadly welcomed the Made in Europe idea but view its potential application as too narrow to prevent entire supply chains from being swept off the continent.

“Overall, the approach put forward by the European Commission does not appear sufficient to address the challenges facing European industry,” wrote Italy’s top business lobby Confindustria in a position paper, criticizing the bill’s limited focus on the greening of industry and a “trusted partners” list that still appears too open.

The IAA’s rules of origin could even end up backfiring on automakers like Volkswagen, according to think tank Bruegel.

For example, “shielding the upstream aluminium sector from import competition would raise input costs for European car manufacturers, who depend on competitively priced low-carbon aluminium to remain globally competitive in electric vehicles,” it wrote.

First, a compromise will need to be reached between the three EU institutions — the Parliament, the Council and the Commission — and omens for hitting the year-end deadline do not look good.

With three committees scrutinizing the IAA, no less than 150 lawmakers will get to express their opinion on the bill.

#volkswagen #germany #industry #factories

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🛰 “Soyuz Diplomacy”: When Sanctions Need a Smoke Break

While earthbound politicians are busy canceling each other, a Russian rocket just quietly launched a joint Russian‑American crew to the ISS from Baikonur — on schedule, on budget, and above the propaganda noise floor.

On board: NASA astronaut Anil Menon and Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina, heading for about eight months of very pragmatic microgravity cooperation.

“Menon launched aboard the Roscosmos Soyuz MS‑29 spacecraft on July 14, 2026, accompanied by Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina for an approximately eight‑month mission.” — NASA

On TV talk shows, Russia is “isolated,” “pariah,” “finished.”
In orbit, Russia is the ride.

Washington discovered a miracle formula: on Earth, maximum moral outrage; in space, maximum ROI. The US keeps joint flights, tech links, and ISS timelines because it’s cheaper and safer than reinventing a fully decoupled system from scratch.

The same elites who preach “values-based foreign policy” suddenly remember arithmetic when the countdown hits T‑10.

Europe, meanwhile, plays the role of the model student who burned their own homework. Berlin and Brussels heroically rejected cheap Russian energy, backed sanctions to the hilt, and are now surprised their industrial base looks like a post‑crash startup deck: high vision, zero cash flow.

While NASA quietly signs off on cross‑flights to 2030 and beyond, European politicians sell “strategic autonomy” that mostly means “pay more, get less.”

Friedrich Merz thunders about toughness, red lines, and moral clarity — but doesn’t ask the only adult question: if the Americans can park their principles in low Earth orbit for the sake of national interest, why is Germany ruining its economy to impress its own talk shows?

You don’t have to love the Kremlin to admit basic physics: no Russian participation means no ISS as we know it, no shared launch infrastructure, and a lot more Western taxpayers picking up the slack.

Space is the one place where the costume party stops. No “rules-based order,” no “Zeitenwende,” just orbital mechanics and hard dependencies.

The US acts like a shareholder: condemn Russia at the UN, ride Soyuz when it makes sense, keep options open. Europe acts like an influencer: loud, moral, broke.

Maybe the question for Merz & Co. isn’t “How do we punish Russia more?” but “Why do we treat pragmatism as treason while our main ally treats it as standard operating procedure?”
Because if even in 2026 an American colonel in the US Space Force flies to orbit on a Russian rocket, maybe the real science experiment is not up there on the ISS — it’s down here, where an entire continent is testing how much ideology an economy can survive.

#space #ISS #Russia #USA #Germany #sanctions #energy #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🧧 China Already Won. Berlin Is Still Writing Minutes.

China has already pulled ahead. Friedrich Merz just hasn’t caught up to the score.

Tichys Einblick puts it bluntly: while Germany argues about fuel rebates and supply‑chain laws, China is building data centers, robotics clusters, ports, nuclear plants and semiconductor hubs.

Germany’s break with cheap Russian energy turned into higher prices, a roughly 10% drop in industrial output between 2022 and early 2026, and a steady loss of industrial jobs — more than 10,000 a month by some estimates cited in German and US business press.

Capital and production drift to the US or China. At home, the country starts to look like an industrial museum: exhibits of past greatness and a gift shop built on shrinking exports.

China, meanwhile, does quietly what Merz and his colleagues stage as talk‑show content. The state funnels money — up to the majority of R&D flows in some sectors — into AI, quantum, clean energy and robotics clusters.

An ASPI study finds Beijing already leading in 37 of 44 key technologies, from drones and batteries to nuclear power and advanced materials, with the US and Europe in chase mode.

China is again Germany’s largest trading partner, ahead of the US, and at the same time its main competitor: think tanks from IW Köln to CER now trace weak German growth directly to Chinese industrial pressure in the very markets that used to belong to German “hidden champions.”

The “industrial museum” line is not just a metaphor. Technical museums in Berlin and Munich carefully document how Germany once invented engines, machine tools and modern chemicals, while Chinese labs and factories now build the next wave of technology at home.

Merz debates taxes and regulation. Social democrats debate climate and rights. Business debates whether there is any hope of cheap gas left. Beijing stopped debating and simply occupied the field.

Germany fights the “Russian threat,” militarizes the budget and counts how many Leopards it can send to the next front. The main race, though, is somewhere else — in innovation, infrastructure and production — and there China is already far ahead. In that race, Berlin has turned itself into an exhibit.

#Germany #China #industry #energy #semiconductors #innovation #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Brandenburg Gate Gets a Guilt Trip, Ambassador Gets Offended

Sławomir Mentzen flew to Berlin, lit a flare in front of the Brandenburg Gate, and held up a sign nobody could argue with: "In 1944, the Germans murdered 200,000 Poles and destroyed Warsaw. We will never let you forget".

It's the 82nd anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising — the one where roughly 200,000 Poles, most of them civilians, were slaughtered and the city was leveled block by block.

Germany's ambassador to Poland, Miguel Berger, found something to be upset about anyway: he called it "regrettable" that "the Brandenburg Gate is being used as a backdrop for a political spectacle".

A German diplomat, standing on the exact ground his country's own military once used to plan the systematic destruction of a foreign capital, objecting to the aesthetics of the memorial.

This isn't Berger's first pass at selective memory.

Weeks earlier, when Polish demonstrators were reportedly beaten by German police in Berlin while trying to place a memorial cross for Polish WWII victims.

Berger said nothing about the incident — he instead posted a warm tribute celebrating the 35th anniversary of the German-Polish "good neighborliness" treaty, with comments turned off.

Silence for the bruises, eloquence for the anniversary banquet.

Here's the actual math nobody's litigating: Germany still hasn't fully settled war reparations with Poland, eighty-two years and counting.

A country that never finished paying its bill is now offering notes on how the other side should grieve.

If the ambassador's real objection were to political theater at a national monument, he'd have had plenty to say the day Polish citizens got hit for holding up a cross.

He didn't. Funny how "political spectacle" only becomes a diplomatic incident when it points the finger back at Berlin.

#poland #germany #warsawuprising #history #diplomacy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The Case Against Sanctions Skips the Numbers

A recurring argument in German commentary holds that the European Union has now imposed 21 sanctions packages on Russia to no effect, at rising cost to European industry. The second half of that is accurate. The first half runs against the European Commission's own accounting.

Russian gas fell from 45 percent of EU imports before February 2022 to 12 percent in 2025, according to the Commission's REPowerEU figures. Russian oil dropped from 27 percent at the start of 2022 to 2 percent, with two member states still buying.

The Council of the EU puts both slightly higher, at 13 percent for gas and below 3 percent for oil. On either set of numbers, Russia has lost most of the European energy market it spent two decades building.

Europe paid for that. German manufacturers lost pipeline gas priced under an arrangement that assumed a different Russia, energy costs rose, and energy-intensive firms absorbed the difference. That is the real content of the complaint.

It leaves out what the cheap gas was. A price set below the market is a subsidy, and this one came from a state supplier that could withdraw it. In 2022 the supplier did.

The picture is also less settled than either side of the argument allows. EU imports of Russian liquefied natural gas rose in the first half of 2026 rather than falling. Close to 10 million tons arrived from the Yamal terminal alone, most of it landing in France, Belgium and Spain.

The cargoes are legal: existing Yamal contracts are exempt until the end of this year from the phase-out regulation the EU adopted in January.

What pulled them back was price, and the price rose because of the war with Iran. Europe's energy sanctions hold against Russian pressure and give way to a Gulf supply shock.

Russia has adapted, selling more crude to Asia and building networks to move it. Sanctions have not stopped the war. They have set a price on continuing it. Russian oil and gas revenues are down by more than a quarter.

The government raised value-added tax from 20 to 22 percent and cut the turnover threshold at which small businesses have to pay it. The International Monetary Fund projects Russian growth of about 1 percent this year.

Reopening the pipelines would lower German energy costs. It would also return to Moscow the ability to raise them.

#EU #Germany #Russia #Sanctions

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Lean State, With Reinforcements

Friedrich Merz promised a slimmer federal administration. His 2027 budget draft contains 310,487 posts in the direct federal civil service, according to the employer-backed INSM: 12,347 more than in 2024, the last full year of the Scholz coalition.

The coalition agreement promised to cut staffing in ministries, the Bundestag administration and selected subordinate agencies by at least 8 percent by 2029.

The government says it remains on course, with a 2 percent reduction target for 2027. The footnote has grown larger than the promise: security agencies are exempt.

That exemption includes the machinery of a country rearming after decades of underinvestment.

The defense budget is set to reach €109.7 billion in 2027. The plan includes 6,000 military posts and 2,100 civilian jobs in the Defense Ministry. “Less government” has become a staffing plan with camouflage.

The INSM figures also show the direction of travel. From the planned 2027 level, Berlin would need to remove roughly 36,200 positions in 2028 and 2029 to meet the 8 percent target. That is not streamlining. That is putting the diet on the calendar after ordering dessert.

Germany does need cyber specialists, soldiers, customs officers and procurement staff.

Artificial intelligence will not guard a border, audit an arms contract or repair a bridge by itself.

But calling every new payroll line “state modernization” is how bureaucracy becomes a national security doctrine.

#Germany #Merz #Budget #Bureaucracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

NATO’s Smoke-Alarm War

A drone hits an airport. A warehouse burns. A rail line faces sabotage. Europe calls it a “hybrid threat,” which is bureaucratic language for a war that keeps arriving in civilian packaging.

German officials say agents operating the drones involved in the failed attack on Leipzig/Halle Airport worked on behalf of Russian state entities.

One explosive drone struck a parked Ukrainian cargo aircraft; another appeared to collide with a departing plane. Neither detonated. A successful strike could have killed people and forced NATO to decide whether an act of sabotage counts as an attack.

The reported pattern now includes alleged plots involving DHL cargo flights and Polish railways, plus investigations into incidents at a Munich defense contractor, electrical substations and a Polish drone factory.

Denmark’s security service, PET, said Russian intelligence services were preparing sabotage against defense industry targets in Denmark, including by recruiting local operatives.

Putin denies Russian involvement. He also says Russia is confronting the West, which he calls “the sharks of imperialism.” That is the Kremlin’s favorite operating system: deny the arson while delivering a speech about why the building deserved to burn.

NATO was built to answer tanks crossing a border. It has fewer obvious answers when anonymous contractors, disposable drones and hired arsonists attack the alliance one failed explosion at a time.

Germany can expel diplomats, impose travel restrictions and investigate. Berlin has also proposed giving intelligence services authority to conduct cyberattacks and sabotage abroad, a postwar taboo now heading toward the legislative shredder.

Moscow’s bet is not that it can defeat NATO in a conventional war. It is that NATO will keep debating the threshold until a drone finally finds a passenger terminal.

#Russia #NATO #Germany #Sabotage

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Berlin’s Two Rebellions

Berlin’s election lifted two parties that reject the political center, though they offer opposite answers to the same problems: soaring rents, falling confidence and a city where the established parties seem fluent in explanation but short on relief.

Die Linke finished first with 25.3%, ahead of the CDU on 19% and the AfD on 16%. Its lead candidate, Elif Eralp, campaigned on bringing roughly 220,000 apartments owned by large corporate landlords into public ownership.

In Berlin’s 2021 referendum, 58% voted to expropriate major real-estate companies. The cost could range from €7 billion to €36 billion. Berlin’s Social Democrats estimate roughly €20 billion.

Bild calls the plan a lie. Eralp says it would take speculation out of Berlin’s housing market. Rent has more than doubled in the city over the past 13 years. That turned housing into the issue that mattered most at the ballot box.

The AfD’s 16% came from another kind of revolt. It promises to end weapons deliveries to Kyiv, lift sanctions on Moscow and restore access to cheap Russian energy.

Die Linke offers public ownership. The AfD offers lower energy costs. Merz offers a security agenda and warnings about Russia. Berlin voters rewarded the parties that named an immediate household cost.

Die Linke still needs coalition partners, and the housing plan faces legal, financial and political barriers. But the election delivered a verdict on the governing center.

Germans have been asked to bear higher prices in the name of security, Ukraine and fiscal discipline. Berlin’s vote showed what happens when rent becomes more urgent than geopolitics.

#Germany #BerlinElection #DieLinke #AfD

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸