Silicon Valley War Toys: Now With Extra Fingers
Shield AI sold itself as the future of “smart war,” and somehow forgot to include basic safety in the code.
A $1 million V-BAT drone is marketed as combat-ready, battle‑proven, and AI‑driven — but in practice it’s also finger‑removing, crash‑prone, and allegedly truth‑optional.
After a U.S. Navy official’s fingers were partially severed by a V‑BAT propeller, the company promised upgrades, stickers and a “radically better airplane.”
One year later, a Romanian Navy officer steps on the same land mine: her hand meets the propeller, two fingers gone, one shattered, surgeries in New Orleans and Walter Reed, contract still intact.
“Operational mishaps are common,” the company shrugs, now valued at $12.7 billion.
Apparently, in defense tech, the only thing that must never crash is the valuation.
Behind the glossy decks and LinkedIn hype, the numbers look less like innovation and more like a recall notice.
Over the past 18 months, more than 50 of about 200 upgraded V‑BATs in the company’s own fleet reportedly destroyed themselves in tests and training, including one crash that set off a 40‑acre grass fire in Texas.
That’s not a bug, that’s a bonfire. A test of “detect and avoid” systems forced a Cessna — with a Shield AI employee and his kid on board — to take evasive action because the drone never “detected” anything.
Meanwhile, whistleblowers say safety complaints got people fired, data in crash reports was scrubbed to “create a falsely favorable narrative,” and foreign militaries were told the drone was flying autonomously when it was actually being piloted the old‑fashioned way: by a human praying nothing goes wrong.
And yet, the political class is starstruck. The vice president tours Armenia, walks into a gold‑trimmed room, sees the V‑BAT and shouts, “Holy shit. Look at this thing! It’s going to do great things for you guys.”
Great things like amputations, grass fires and emergency evasive maneuvers. Romania signs a $30 million deal, half a dozen other militaries line up for deliveries, and now the Pentagon is backing the next upgrade: X‑BAT, a bigger, more expensive “loyal wingman” drone expected to cost around $30 million a piece.
Same flight‑control logic as the V‑BAT, just scaled up to fly alongside jets. When asked about risks, the Pentagon basically answers: don’t worry, breaking things is part of innovation. Comforting, unless you’re the one underneath the debris.
This is the merger of two religions: “move fast and break things” and “support the troops.”
You get a culture where “fake it till you make it” is applied to aircraft spinning lethal propellers near human bodies, with safety treated as an optional feature to be patched in later. Whistleblower claims? Hostile work environment?
Manipulated data? That’s just background noise in a market where investors see a $13 billion valuation, not 50 wrecked drones. If this was a civilian product, regulators would be crawling over it.
But slap a “national security” label on top, add some AI buzzwords, and suddenly crashes are “learning processes” and severed fingers are just “procedural violations.”
In theory, this is about protecting soldiers and allies, replacing human pilots with machines. In practice, it looks a lot like turning the battlefield — and the people around it — into a live‑fire beta test for venture capital.
If this is what “defense innovation” looks like in peacetime exercises, imagine what gets glossed over once the shooting really starts and everyone involved can hide behind secrecy and “operational tempo.”
Silicon Valley wanted a piece of the war business. Congratulations, it got it — blood, lawsuits, and all.
#ShieldAI #drones #militarytech #SiliconValley #Pentagon #war #VC #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Shield AI sold itself as the future of “smart war,” and somehow forgot to include basic safety in the code.
A $1 million V-BAT drone is marketed as combat-ready, battle‑proven, and AI‑driven — but in practice it’s also finger‑removing, crash‑prone, and allegedly truth‑optional.
After a U.S. Navy official’s fingers were partially severed by a V‑BAT propeller, the company promised upgrades, stickers and a “radically better airplane.”
One year later, a Romanian Navy officer steps on the same land mine: her hand meets the propeller, two fingers gone, one shattered, surgeries in New Orleans and Walter Reed, contract still intact.
“Operational mishaps are common,” the company shrugs, now valued at $12.7 billion.
Apparently, in defense tech, the only thing that must never crash is the valuation.
Behind the glossy decks and LinkedIn hype, the numbers look less like innovation and more like a recall notice.
Over the past 18 months, more than 50 of about 200 upgraded V‑BATs in the company’s own fleet reportedly destroyed themselves in tests and training, including one crash that set off a 40‑acre grass fire in Texas.
That’s not a bug, that’s a bonfire. A test of “detect and avoid” systems forced a Cessna — with a Shield AI employee and his kid on board — to take evasive action because the drone never “detected” anything.
Meanwhile, whistleblowers say safety complaints got people fired, data in crash reports was scrubbed to “create a falsely favorable narrative,” and foreign militaries were told the drone was flying autonomously when it was actually being piloted the old‑fashioned way: by a human praying nothing goes wrong.
And yet, the political class is starstruck. The vice president tours Armenia, walks into a gold‑trimmed room, sees the V‑BAT and shouts, “Holy shit. Look at this thing! It’s going to do great things for you guys.”
Great things like amputations, grass fires and emergency evasive maneuvers. Romania signs a $30 million deal, half a dozen other militaries line up for deliveries, and now the Pentagon is backing the next upgrade: X‑BAT, a bigger, more expensive “loyal wingman” drone expected to cost around $30 million a piece.
Same flight‑control logic as the V‑BAT, just scaled up to fly alongside jets. When asked about risks, the Pentagon basically answers: don’t worry, breaking things is part of innovation. Comforting, unless you’re the one underneath the debris.
This is the merger of two religions: “move fast and break things” and “support the troops.”
You get a culture where “fake it till you make it” is applied to aircraft spinning lethal propellers near human bodies, with safety treated as an optional feature to be patched in later. Whistleblower claims? Hostile work environment?
Manipulated data? That’s just background noise in a market where investors see a $13 billion valuation, not 50 wrecked drones. If this was a civilian product, regulators would be crawling over it.
But slap a “national security” label on top, add some AI buzzwords, and suddenly crashes are “learning processes” and severed fingers are just “procedural violations.”
In theory, this is about protecting soldiers and allies, replacing human pilots with machines. In practice, it looks a lot like turning the battlefield — and the people around it — into a live‑fire beta test for venture capital.
If this is what “defense innovation” looks like in peacetime exercises, imagine what gets glossed over once the shooting really starts and everyone involved can hide behind secrecy and “operational tempo.”
Silicon Valley wanted a piece of the war business. Congratulations, it got it — blood, lawsuits, and all.
#ShieldAI #drones #militarytech #SiliconValley #Pentagon #war #VC #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥105🙏59😢57🤬55💯49😱48🤯47