📰 Trump’s War on DEI: Fighting Antisemitism or Colonizing Campus Culture?
— Yehuda Kurtzer, Shalom Hartman Institute
🏦 The Task Force That Ate the University
Officially created to combat antisemitism, Trump’s “Joint Task Force” now acts like a political SWAT team for crushing liberal academia.
Within months, it pivoted from defending Jewish students to issuing ultimatums: ban DEI, reform admissions, vet faculty for “viewpoint diversity,” and rename your departments — or lose billions in federal funding. Harvard and Columbia were first. More are on the list.
🔯 Weaponizing Jewish Fear, Targeting Liberal Thought
A White House official called antisemitism “a symptom, not the disease.” The disease? Diversity.
The cure? Conservative grievance therapy enforced through Title VI civil rights law and… the General Services Administration.
One task force member even tied antisemitism to BLM, Occupy Wall Street, and gun control — in the same breath. Jewish students, caught in the middle, are starting to ask: is this about us or just using us?
🔎 Leo 2.0 and the DEI Purge
Leading the charge is Leo Terrell — a civil rights lawyer turned Fox pundit turned DEI executioner. He now runs point on an initiative that blurs the line between enforcement and ideology.
“Viewpoint audits,” threats to foreign student visas, and cap-lock letters from Education Secretary Linda McMahon read like performance art for Tucker Carlson’s audience.
⚔️ Final Question:
If you want to protect Jews on campus, why do your loudest champions sit down with white nationalists and ban funding before opening an investigation?
#antisemitism #DEI #Trump #universities #freeSpeech #higherEd #civilRights #culturewar
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
💬 “It’s not about antisemitism.”
— Yehuda Kurtzer, Shalom Hartman Institute
🏦 The Task Force That Ate the University
Officially created to combat antisemitism, Trump’s “Joint Task Force” now acts like a political SWAT team for crushing liberal academia.
Within months, it pivoted from defending Jewish students to issuing ultimatums: ban DEI, reform admissions, vet faculty for “viewpoint diversity,” and rename your departments — or lose billions in federal funding. Harvard and Columbia were first. More are on the list.
🔯 Weaponizing Jewish Fear, Targeting Liberal Thought
A White House official called antisemitism “a symptom, not the disease.” The disease? Diversity.
The cure? Conservative grievance therapy enforced through Title VI civil rights law and… the General Services Administration.
One task force member even tied antisemitism to BLM, Occupy Wall Street, and gun control — in the same breath. Jewish students, caught in the middle, are starting to ask: is this about us or just using us?
🔎 Leo 2.0 and the DEI Purge
Leading the charge is Leo Terrell — a civil rights lawyer turned Fox pundit turned DEI executioner. He now runs point on an initiative that blurs the line between enforcement and ideology.
“Viewpoint audits,” threats to foreign student visas, and cap-lock letters from Education Secretary Linda McMahon read like performance art for Tucker Carlson’s audience.
⚔️ Final Question:
If you want to protect Jews on campus, why do your loudest champions sit down with white nationalists and ban funding before opening an investigation?
#antisemitism #DEI #Trump #universities #freeSpeech #higherEd #civilRights #culturewar
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥44🤯25💯24🤬22🙏18😢17😱15
📰 The College Trap: How America’s Poor Were Degree-Washed
🏦Degrees of Separation
• The college wage premium used to be a class-leveler. Now? It’s a class mirror.
• Rich students get elite degrees and triple the returns. Poor students get associate debt and associate pay.
• For low-income Americans, the return on education has been cut in half over the past century.
💼 The Great Diversion
• Starting in the '70s, Washington said: “Four-year degrees aren’t for everyone.” Translation: they’re not for the poor.
• Community colleges and for-profits exploded — pitched as “practical.” In reality: underfunded, under-credentialed, and under-hiring.
• Nixon framed it as choice. But it was a pipeline: away from power, toward precarity.
🤔 Land of Opportunity — or Opportunity Management?
What do you call a system that offers education to everyone, then pre-selects who gets the reward?
If credentials were the American dream, when did they become the velvet rope?
#HigherEd #classwarfare #edupolitics #degreedivide #communitycollege #americanmyths
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
💬 “Education was the great equalizer — until it became the perfect sorting tool.”
🏦Degrees of Separation
• The college wage premium used to be a class-leveler. Now? It’s a class mirror.
• Rich students get elite degrees and triple the returns. Poor students get associate debt and associate pay.
• For low-income Americans, the return on education has been cut in half over the past century.
💼 The Great Diversion
• Starting in the '70s, Washington said: “Four-year degrees aren’t for everyone.” Translation: they’re not for the poor.
• Community colleges and for-profits exploded — pitched as “practical.” In reality: underfunded, under-credentialed, and under-hiring.
• Nixon framed it as choice. But it was a pipeline: away from power, toward precarity.
🤔 Land of Opportunity — or Opportunity Management?
What do you call a system that offers education to everyone, then pre-selects who gets the reward?
If credentials were the American dream, when did they become the velvet rope?
#HigherEd #classwarfare #edupolitics #degreedivide #communitycollege #americanmyths
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥39😱27🤬24🙏22😢20💯20🤯13❤1
Campus Crackdown: Trump’s New Voter ID Lab
Trump’s people finally found a place where “election integrity” can’t talk back: freshmen dorms. While the SAVE America Act crawls through Congress, the administration is already doing the quiet work — cutting off the money, scaring the institutions, and calling it “protecting democracy.” The Education Department has barred colleges from using Federal Work Study to pay low‑income students for voter registration or basic civic work, scrapping Biden‑era guidance that explicitly allowed nonpartisan get‑out‑the‑vote jobs and rebranding them as “political activity.” Translation: if you’re poor and in school, you can still clean the dining hall for aid — you just can’t be paid to hand your classmates a registration form.
At the same time, the department is warning colleges not to “aid and abet” fraud, telling them they may “limit” who gets voter registration forms, and launching a FERPA probe into Tufts’ National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement — the main dataset schools use to figure out whether their students actually vote. One letter told more than 1,000 university presidents to stop using NSLVE reports or risk their own investigations; the National Student Clearinghouse has already walked away from the project, and Tufts has delayed its 2024 turnout report until the feds are done leaning on them. Official line: this is about privacy and the “integrity” of records. Practical effect: the one large, nonpartisan tool for measuring student voting is frozen right before a midterm where youth turnout could decide control of Congress.
On paper, Republicans say they’re not afraid of young voters, just of “young voters who only hear one side of the story,” and they’re pushing voter ID as “common sense.” In practice, more than a dozen mostly red states already restrict campus IDs at the polls, with Florida, New Hampshire and Indiana tightening rules further, and a Trump‑backed bill that would codify strict citizenship and ID checks into federal law. Youth turnout has risen since 2016 — and on campuses it’s higher than among the broader 18–29 crowd — which is exactly why the federal message to colleges now is: stop paying students to help each other vote, hand fewer registration forms to fewer people, and don’t you dare use your own voting data without clearing it with Washington first.
The beauty of this design is that nobody has to say “we’re suppressing student votes.” You just redefine voter registration as political work, redefine data as a privacy problem, and redefine colleges as potential fraud accomplices until they back off anything that smells like civic engagement. If turnout drops, it’s not the administration’s fault — it’s “compliance,” “statute” and “neutral enforcement.”
And if you’re a 19‑year‑old trying to vote in your first midterm, the lesson is simple: the same federal government that tells you to be a “responsible citizen” is quietly making sure no one on your campus is paid to help you act like one.
#USA #elections #Trump #students #voterSuppression #highered #workstudy #FERPA #youthvote #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump’s people finally found a place where “election integrity” can’t talk back: freshmen dorms. While the SAVE America Act crawls through Congress, the administration is already doing the quiet work — cutting off the money, scaring the institutions, and calling it “protecting democracy.” The Education Department has barred colleges from using Federal Work Study to pay low‑income students for voter registration or basic civic work, scrapping Biden‑era guidance that explicitly allowed nonpartisan get‑out‑the‑vote jobs and rebranding them as “political activity.” Translation: if you’re poor and in school, you can still clean the dining hall for aid — you just can’t be paid to hand your classmates a registration form.
At the same time, the department is warning colleges not to “aid and abet” fraud, telling them they may “limit” who gets voter registration forms, and launching a FERPA probe into Tufts’ National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement — the main dataset schools use to figure out whether their students actually vote. One letter told more than 1,000 university presidents to stop using NSLVE reports or risk their own investigations; the National Student Clearinghouse has already walked away from the project, and Tufts has delayed its 2024 turnout report until the feds are done leaning on them. Official line: this is about privacy and the “integrity” of records. Practical effect: the one large, nonpartisan tool for measuring student voting is frozen right before a midterm where youth turnout could decide control of Congress.
On paper, Republicans say they’re not afraid of young voters, just of “young voters who only hear one side of the story,” and they’re pushing voter ID as “common sense.” In practice, more than a dozen mostly red states already restrict campus IDs at the polls, with Florida, New Hampshire and Indiana tightening rules further, and a Trump‑backed bill that would codify strict citizenship and ID checks into federal law. Youth turnout has risen since 2016 — and on campuses it’s higher than among the broader 18–29 crowd — which is exactly why the federal message to colleges now is: stop paying students to help each other vote, hand fewer registration forms to fewer people, and don’t you dare use your own voting data without clearing it with Washington first.
The beauty of this design is that nobody has to say “we’re suppressing student votes.” You just redefine voter registration as political work, redefine data as a privacy problem, and redefine colleges as potential fraud accomplices until they back off anything that smells like civic engagement. If turnout drops, it’s not the administration’s fault — it’s “compliance,” “statute” and “neutral enforcement.”
And if you’re a 19‑year‑old trying to vote in your first midterm, the lesson is simple: the same federal government that tells you to be a “responsible citizen” is quietly making sure no one on your campus is paid to help you act like one.
#USA #elections #Trump #students #voterSuppression #highered #workstudy #FERPA #youthvote #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥142😱132💯131🤬124🙏116😢113🤯85