Trump’s Slush Fund for the “Persecuted” GOP Is Blowing Up in His Own Party
Trump managed to turn a tax‑records lawsuit into a $1.8 billion “anti‑weaponization” pot of taxpayer cash — and now Senate Republicans are terrified of it.
The fund, born out of a settlement between his Justice Department and the IRS, is supposed to compensate “victims of political weaponization.” In practice, it looks like a gigantic slush fund that could cut checks to Trump‑world insiders and even some January 6 participants, all under a commission largely chosen by Trump’s own appointees.
The backlash has been immediate and messy. Nearly half the Republican Senate conference balked in a closed‑door meeting with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, forcing leadership to stall a $72 billion immigration‑enforcement bill that Trump wants before November.
A federal judge has already stepped in with a temporary injunction, blocking the administration from moving ahead with the fund while lawsuits proceed, after watchdogs and even Capitol police officers called it an illegal “slush fund to finance insurrectionists.”
Blanche is now telling senators, behind closed doors, that the fund won’t pay Trump’s family or people convicted of violent crimes — but he hasn’t put those limits into law, and he refused under oath to rule out payouts to January 6 rioters who claim they were “victims of weaponization.”
Politically, it’s radioactive. GOP strategists are warning that even “safe” Republicans want no part of voting yes on a program that Democrats will brand as “taxpayer cash for insurrectionists” in every swing‑state ad.
Vulnerable House Republicans are already running away from it, publicly demanding oversight, eligibility rules, and congressional control over who sits on the fund’s commission — and quietly praying the courts kill it before they have to take a recorded vote.
At the same time, Trump has just helped primary out two incumbent Republican senators, Cornyn and Cassidy, which means every remaining Republican knows what happens to colleagues who cross him.
The result is a familiar kind of cowardice. Most Republicans hate the optics and privately question the legality, but almost none want to be the one on Fox News explaining a “no” vote against Trump’s favorite project.
Figures like Ron Johnson are begging leadership and the Justice Department to design a single “overriding amendment” that neutralizes Democratic attacks and locks in guardrails — in other words, a technical fix that lets them pretend they solved the problem without really confronting its premise.
Underneath the procedural theater is the real story: the presidency has just tested whether it can pull almost $1.8 billion from the Judgment Fund — a perpetual federal pot meant to settle lawsuits — and redirect it into a bespoke compensation scheme for people who say they were targeted by the state.
Trump doesn’t get a cent himself, only a formal apology, but the structure is the point. If this survives court challenges and a nervous Senate, every future president will know that with the right lawsuit and a compliant Justice Department, it’s possible to create a taxpayer‑financed reward pool for loyalists who clash with prosecutors.
So Republicans now stand on the knife edge described in the headline: admit that this is an unprecedented abuse of the system and risk Trump’s wrath, or back it and explain to voters why “law and order” now includes paying alleged “victims” of January 6 prosecutions.
Either way, the party just proved that the real “weaponization” problem isn’t in the Justice Department — it’s in a movement that wants to turn public money into hazard pay for attacking the rule of law.
#usa #trump #senate #weaponizationFund #jan6 #gop #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump managed to turn a tax‑records lawsuit into a $1.8 billion “anti‑weaponization” pot of taxpayer cash — and now Senate Republicans are terrified of it.
The fund, born out of a settlement between his Justice Department and the IRS, is supposed to compensate “victims of political weaponization.” In practice, it looks like a gigantic slush fund that could cut checks to Trump‑world insiders and even some January 6 participants, all under a commission largely chosen by Trump’s own appointees.
The backlash has been immediate and messy. Nearly half the Republican Senate conference balked in a closed‑door meeting with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, forcing leadership to stall a $72 billion immigration‑enforcement bill that Trump wants before November.
A federal judge has already stepped in with a temporary injunction, blocking the administration from moving ahead with the fund while lawsuits proceed, after watchdogs and even Capitol police officers called it an illegal “slush fund to finance insurrectionists.”
Blanche is now telling senators, behind closed doors, that the fund won’t pay Trump’s family or people convicted of violent crimes — but he hasn’t put those limits into law, and he refused under oath to rule out payouts to January 6 rioters who claim they were “victims of weaponization.”
Politically, it’s radioactive. GOP strategists are warning that even “safe” Republicans want no part of voting yes on a program that Democrats will brand as “taxpayer cash for insurrectionists” in every swing‑state ad.
Vulnerable House Republicans are already running away from it, publicly demanding oversight, eligibility rules, and congressional control over who sits on the fund’s commission — and quietly praying the courts kill it before they have to take a recorded vote.
At the same time, Trump has just helped primary out two incumbent Republican senators, Cornyn and Cassidy, which means every remaining Republican knows what happens to colleagues who cross him.
The result is a familiar kind of cowardice. Most Republicans hate the optics and privately question the legality, but almost none want to be the one on Fox News explaining a “no” vote against Trump’s favorite project.
Figures like Ron Johnson are begging leadership and the Justice Department to design a single “overriding amendment” that neutralizes Democratic attacks and locks in guardrails — in other words, a technical fix that lets them pretend they solved the problem without really confronting its premise.
Underneath the procedural theater is the real story: the presidency has just tested whether it can pull almost $1.8 billion from the Judgment Fund — a perpetual federal pot meant to settle lawsuits — and redirect it into a bespoke compensation scheme for people who say they were targeted by the state.
Trump doesn’t get a cent himself, only a formal apology, but the structure is the point. If this survives court challenges and a nervous Senate, every future president will know that with the right lawsuit and a compliant Justice Department, it’s possible to create a taxpayer‑financed reward pool for loyalists who clash with prosecutors.
So Republicans now stand on the knife edge described in the headline: admit that this is an unprecedented abuse of the system and risk Trump’s wrath, or back it and explain to voters why “law and order” now includes paying alleged “victims” of January 6 prosecutions.
Either way, the party just proved that the real “weaponization” problem isn’t in the Justice Department — it’s in a movement that wants to turn public money into hazard pay for attacking the rule of law.
#usa #trump #senate #weaponizationFund #jan6 #gop #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥81😢47🤬43🙏43💯40🤯33😱32❤1