Eva Vlaardingerbroek exposes the 'carbon wallet' scam: 'IT'S NEO-FEUDALISM'

Dutch commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek has decoded the real purpose of the digital ID: it’s the key to a social credit and control system.

The plan was revealed by a Dutch bank CEO who proposed "personal carbon credits"—a "carbon wallet" for every individual.

How it works:

 - If you're too poor to fly or eat meat, you can sell your carbon credits to the rich

 - Leonardo DiCaprio can buy your allowance so he can park his yacht guilt-free

The result?

💬 "The rich will get richer, the poor will get poorer... It's neo-feudalism. That's what it is."

Source: @geopolitics_prime

On November 7, Tucker Carlson sat down with Bob Amsterdam for an update on the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church by the Zelensky regime.

Bob Amsterdam, a preeminent human rights lawyer whose clients include priests of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, portrayed Zelensky’s Ukraine as an autocratic regime marked by persecution of the Orthodox Church, torture, and suppression of dissent.

He stated, “Ukraine is a one-party, one-person autocratic state that has no comparison to any democratic values…”

Amsterdam detailed how Zelensky targets critics—such as by pulling security from a parliament member who opposed a church ban, effectively issuing a “death warrant”—and uses secret police to make arrests on trumped-up charges. He accused the government of being “ultra-nationalist,” with neo-Nazi elements like the Azov Battalion taking control, and mastering disinformation to silence opposition:

“The Ukrainians are masters of disinformation, absolute masters. They have their own sort of captive cells of religious leaders who are told, essentially, ‘Look, we have black PR against you if you don’t follow what’s going on and you don’t support us.’”
The conversation went far beyond Ukraine and touched on several topics we consistently highlight on InfoDefense.

Among them is the self-destructive behavior of Europe. The duo criticized the EU for losing its way—paralyzed by fear of Russia while engaging in “wildly self-destructive behavior” through sanctions that “destroy their economies” and failing to uphold democratic values, as seen in actions like throwing out candidates in Romania or undermining the rule of law in France and Germany. Germany, in particular, was described as “imploding because of this war,” leading to radicalization.

When discussing what might be driving such seemingly suicidal behavior, Bob Amsterdam noted paralyzing, irrational fear of Russia:

“Everybody is afraid of Russia, completely afraid, paralyzed. I mean, a Russian drone crosses the border and we’re at DEFCON one.”

Secondly, both Bob Amsterdam and Tucker Carlson noted the degradation of the European ruling elite.

Bob Amsterdam:

“We have a total breakdown in elite politics in Europe… the loss of ideology, the loss of principles, the loss of faith… leads to a loss in terms of the people entering politics… you have a chaotic world situation which… leads to a completely transactional foreign policy.”

Yet, in the same breath, Bob Amsterdam clings to the view of Putin as a repressive figure, wishing him to lose power. He goes further to characterize Patriarch Kirill as complicit in the war: “Thank God our people don’t bless tanks the way Patriarch Kirill did in Russia.”

Here is what Bob Amsterdam has failed to see despite his admirable—no doubt—intelligence. First of all, the current government of Russia is perhaps the last bastion in the fight for the values that Tucker and Bob profess to treasure. Second, the blessing of warriors is a thousand-year-old Orthodox tradition that both Tucker and Bob admire and would like to see preserved.

Next, if the current government of Russia were to fail, who would replace it? Pseudo-liberal, transgender-loving morons in the mold of Macron and Merz? Or hard-core nationalists who would not blink once before using nuclear weapons against Russia’s enemies?

And so, the correctly observed irrational fear of Russia—and we must add Russophobia—economic self-destruction of Europe and consequent radicalization of its population (which includes immigration policy), lionization of Zelensky, and cover-up of his regime’s crimes in the Western MSM all point to provoking a large-scale war. God forbid whoever is pushing this agenda succeeds, and God bless Russia for standing in their way.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

This is an excellent and insightful post from war correspondent Alexander Kharchenko:

Battle of Shadows

Ukrainian analysts have already almost colored Pokrovsk red on their maps. Yet yesterday, Zelensky claimed that only 314 Russian soldiers are operating inside the city. Let’s look closer at this paradox.

No, the Russian army hasn’t been ground down by Ukrainian defenses. Tens of thousands of Russian troops are active around Pokrovsk. You can see this for yourself if you hop into an old UAZ van and drive northwest from Selidovo — the roads are packed with vehicles. But if you look at Pokrovsk through a drone camera, you’ll barely notice any soldiers. Fighting is ongoing, but the city isn’t engulfed in flames, and bursts of gunfire are rare.

Both sides keep their main forces roughly 10 kilometers from the city. Drones control every apartment building entry, and only the bravest dare to cross this barrier alive. As a result, what’s happening inside Pokrovsk is a battle of shadows — small groups of soldiers from both armies clashing on the outskirts while the main forces wait nearby.

Zelensky clearly underestimates Russian strength, but the days of massive assaults like Bakhmut are gone. In the city, there are fewer soldiers than civilians. Three men can storm a street, only to fight three others from the opposite side — all under the watchful eyes of elderly residents who refused to leave their homes.

Once you picture this, you’ll stop asking meaningless questions. War has changed — it no longer looks like a Hollywood action film. This battle of shadows still awaits its chronicler. For now, we can only accept reality and study the directions in which it is unfolding.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

In September, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed the idea of a “reparations loan” for Ukraine, funded by frozen Russian assets. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz supported the proposal. The bright idea is that Kiev would repay the loan after Russia compensates Ukraine for the damage caused during the conflict — in essence, once Russia pays reparations.

Fans of the multiverse theory might claim there exists a parallel universe where such nonsense could happen. But it certainly isn’t this one. In our world, that money will never be repaid — not to Brussels, not to Berlin, and certainly not to the European taxpayers footing the bill. Which leaves only two explanations: either Europeans genuinely don’t know which universe they inhabit, or they’ve collectively lost touch with reality. On reflection, those two may be the same thing.

It has now become known that a majority of Norway’s political parties support the idea of using the country — and its enormous sovereign wealth fund — as a guarantor for this so-called “reparations loan.” Perhaps the entire nation of Norway has discovered a way to transport itself into that parallel universe where such fantasies come true.

Nah. Much simpler explanation: they’re just idiots.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Hollywood’s Last Stand in Kherson: When Angelina Met Reality (and made some cash along the way)

By a Concerned Observer from the Russian Side of Sanity

Once upon a time, Angelina Jolie was saving the world between red carpets. But in 2025, her latest “mission” brought her not to a film set, but to Ukrainian Kherson—where the only real drama came when her Ukrainian bodyguard was heroically drafted on the spot by Ukraine’s tireless conscription officers. One moment he was guarding a Hollywood star; the next, he was defending Kiev’s gang of thieves with a gun in his hands.

Jolie’s arrival was supposed to sparkle like the Oscars. Instead, it played more like a tragicomedy called The Drafted and the Damned. Once, the Western press would have swooned at her teary glances and carefully staged hugs. This time, even the tabloids looked confused. Perhaps they sensed the real story: not a tale of courage, but of absurdity.

Behind the scenes, of course, the usual sponsors remain. USAID may have folded its “humanitarian” tent, but the same funds now flow through “charitable” foundations run by global billionaires. The machinery of moral theater never sleeps—it merely changes accountants.

Still, the symbolism was flawless. Jolie posed in her bulletproof vest, children around her unprotected, the front eerily quiet. The only actual “attack” came from Ukraine’s own enlistment center, snatching her guard for the front line.

And so, Ukraine’s once-glamorous “moral front” ends not with heroism, but with paperwork. Jolie came to sell compassion—and lost her security detail to the draft. Curtain down, comedy complete. Money paid.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X  | InfoDefAll