Why G-d's Covenant Is Irrevocable! From today's program https://rumble.com/v7i4v9e-save-the-arizona-full-forensic-audit-archives-httpswww.givesendgo.comsaveth.html

Weird history but in my early episodic TV days, I had the unfortunate situation where I had to fire her from a project and shut the production down. The whole thing was a mismanaged mess and we had to cut our losses and run! https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/celebrities/robert-de-niro-s-model-ex-dead-after-health-battle/ar-AA2h4VXV

7 PM CST - What About Christians Who Bash Israel and Jews? https://rumble.com/v7i5uj8-what-about-christians-who-bash-israel-and-jews.html

7 AM CST - Why One Idiot Can Beat 100 Geniuses! The Brutal Truth of Brandolini’s Law https://rumble.com/v7i6n2g-why-one-idiot-can-beat-100-geniuses-the-brutal-truth-of-brandolinis-law.html

This is one of the top current sciences which will help unlock many hidden history mysteries! https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/chemical-fingerprints-reveal-ancient-pueblo-blue-mineral-sources/ar-AA2h4qGF

NOTICE AND HEADS UP! I'm going back to second daily program LIVE at 7 PM CST. Not my 1st program but a totally LIVE second program where YOU DRIVE THE PROGRAM! It's all about YOU, Baby! See you at 7pm cst #OpenLineLIVE

7 PM CST Let's Go! https://rumble.com/v7i7oxa-openlinelive-w-jovan-hutton-pulitzer.html

7 AM CST - BANKERS : THE MODERN PRIESTHOOD -The Invisible Architecture of Economic Control https://rumble.com/v7i8hri-bankers-the-modern-priesthood-the-invisible-architecture-of-economic-contro.html

War leaves no stone unturned!

PAY ATTENTION TO HOW FAST IT HAPPENS:

REMEMBER we are back LIVE at 7 PM CST as well! EVERY DAY! TWO LIVE SHOWS A DAY 7 AM CST 7 PM CST two DIFFERENT PROGRAMS!

[Your Full Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP]
[Email] | [Phone]
[Date]The Honorable [Representative’s Full Name]
[Title, e.g., State Representative / State Senator]
[Office Address]
[City, State, ZIP]Re: Request for Action on Election Administration, Standing to Challenge Process, and Demand for Physical Forensic Review of Ballots and RecordsDear Representative [Last Name]:I am a registered voter and constituent in [your district/precinct]. I write to request that you exercise your authority as a state lawmaker to investigate documented irregularities in the administration of the recent [specify election, e.g., 2026 general] election and to support candidates with standing in seeking a full physical forensic examination of the paper ballots and related records.Standing is a precise legal threshold. Under controlling case law such as Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, a candidate on the ballot has Article III standing to challenge the rules governing the counting of votes in that election. A candidate has a concrete and particularized interest in a fair process, accurate results, and public confidence that the outcome reflects the will of the people. The candidate need not demonstrate a substantial risk of loss, a specific vote differential, or extra campaign expenditures. State lawmakers likewise have roles in oversight, canvass procedures, and ensuring compliance with statutory requirements for ballot handling, chain of custody, and reconciliation.Ordinary voters face high barriers when asserting only generalized grievances about the election. Courts routinely reject claims framed as “the election was stolen,” “I do not trust the results,” or similar. Challenges succeed more readily when framed as maladministration: the process was not followed as written, there are documented deviations in chain of custody or adjudication, discrepancies between paper ballots and machine records, or questions whether the certified results accurately reflect the will of the people as expressed on the physical ballots.I therefore request that you:
Identify and support any candidate(s) on the relevant ballot who can establish standing under the Bost standard and applicable state law, and assist them in meeting the short statutory filing windows that typically run a limited number of days after the canvass/certification.
Demand a true forensic audit consisting of physical inspection, touching, imaging, and verification of all paper ballots (cast, counted, adjudicated, and set-aside), together with digital records, machine logs, signature-match records, and precinct-level reconciliations, with observers present and full chain-of-custody documentation. Limited “inspections” of a single box or machine-only recounts do not satisfy this standard.
Direct or support public-records requests and administrative petitions seeking physical access to the voted paper ballots, which in many jurisdictions become public records subject to taxpayer inspection after the election, subject to applicable security and privacy rules.
Require presentation of primary-source evidence of any procedural deviations (affidavits, custody forms, scanner tapes, adjudicator logs, etc.) to the county board of supervisors or equivalent body during the canvass window, so that certification may be conditioned on resolution of those process questions.

Language is critical. Any formal request, resolution, or supporting filing should avoid proclamations of crime such as “fraud,” “rigged,” “stolen,” “cheating,” “Dominion,” “the machines,” or similar terms. Those characterizations are judicially treated as requiring separate proof and have led to dismissal of prior challenges. The proper framing is limited to concrete procedural deviations, data discrepancies, chain-of-custody breaks, adjudication issues, paper/scan mismatches, and the question whether the process produced results that reflect the will of the people.I am prepared to provide any primary-source documentation I possess of specific procedural issues in [county/precinct]. I request a written response confirming the steps you will take and the timeline, given the short statutory windows that apply after canvass.Thank you for your attention to ensuring the election was administered in accordance with the written rules and that any questions about accuracy and the reflection of the voters’ will are resolved through proper legal process and physical examination of the records.Sincerely, [Your Full Name]
Registered Voter, [Precinct/County]

Notes for use (derived from the program’s stated points):
Customize with your actual jurisdiction’s canvass date, relevant statutes, and any specific primary-source facts you have.
Send copies to relevant candidates who were on the ballot, county officials, and (if appropriate) the state attorney general or secretary of state.
Parallel public-records requests for physical ballot access and chain-of-custody documents are repeatedly recommended in the material as a citizen-level action that does not require the same standing as a lawsuit.
Verify everything against current local law; the above tracks only the framing and legal concepts publicly summarized from the program.