Just in case anyone thinks that the majority of our clerks are not honest and think they are doing a perfect job - here is an example of what can happen with a system that is not secure. I am sure the driver was licensed, trained to drive a car, fully insured, wearing their seatbelt.....And when you watch this, realize this was from 2015. That is a world of time ago in computer years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK0SrxBC1xs&t=202s

Why are you afraid to speak up?
What will they take from you?
Your freedom? They already did.
Your voice? They did that too.

Dignity anyone? Call the demons by their name. Be fearless.
Truth does not cower .

Stand up-

In regards to the new claim that election equipment is critical infrastructure and forensic audits are not allowed:
I believe they are referring to
12.1-21-06. Tampering with or damaging a critical infrastructure facility or a public
service - Penalty.
1. An individual may not cause a substantial interruption or impairment of a critical
infrastructure facility or a public service by:
a. Tampering with or damaging the tangible property of another;
b. Incapacitating an operator of a critical infrastructure facility or a public service;
c. Damaging, destroying, vandalizing, defacing, or tampering with equipment in a
critical infrastructure facility

Intentionally "tampering" is a felony.

However, according to the HAVA act and the EAC any non-diminimus change to the election equipment results in it being decertified AND states authorize contractors to make changes that meet this definition regularly but they do not initiate the decertification.

This seems to be a situation where there is an attempt to apply laws only to some people, which is specifically unconstitutional in ND per Article I, Section 22.

(Also, our government officials are by law required to keep all election things, not just the ballots.)

Further, our constitution states that the legislature is responsible for elections, Article II, Section 1.

Which truly, could be used to state that they are acting unconstitutionally by not doing a full complete forensic audit. The constitution also holds more weight than the century code and the legislators have each taken an oath to protect the people and our constitution.

ELDER HACKED? Here is a low tech hack of a ballot. When folds run through candidate vote space it either does not scan and forces adjudication OR outright misalligns and auto canceled vote #ScanTheBallots @larryelder @GOPLeader #JovanHuttonPulitzer #GUILTY

"We are seeing what happens when you have a dishonest election. This is what happens. Our nation is being destroyed by people who have no right to destroy it." - President Trump

@LizHarrington76

🔴 City Councilman, Five Others Charged With Election Fraud

https://resistthemainstream.org/city-councilman-five-others-charged-with-election-fraud/?utm_source=rtmt&utm_medium=rtmt&utm_campaign=rtmt

ABBREVIATED NOTICE OF INTENT TO

ADOPT ADMINISTRATIVE RULES


RELATING TO CERTIFYING AND DECERTIFYING ELECTRONIC


VOTING SYSTEMS


TAKE NOTICE that the Secretary of State will hold a public hearing to address proposed

changes to the N.D. Admin. Code at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, September 13, 2021, in the Pioneer

meeting room at the North Dakota State Capitol, 600 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck ND 58505.

A copy of the proposed rules may be obtained at SOS.ND.Gov or by writing the Secretary

of State at 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Dept. 108, Bismarck ND 58505.

Also, written comments may be submitted to 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Dept. 108,

Bismarck ND 58505, until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, September 23, 2021. If you plan to attend the

public hearing and will need special facilities or assistance relating to a disability, please contact

the Secretary of State at the above address at least one week prior to the public hearing.

Dated this 27


th day of July, 2021.


Alvin A Jaeger, Secretary of State


ARTICLE 72-06

ELECTIONS

Chapter

72-06-01 Certifying and Decertifying Electronic Counting Machines and Voting Systems

72-06-02 Notification to Military and Overseas Voter of Rejection of Absentee Ballot Request

72-06-03 Tribal Identification for Voting

CHAPTER 72-06-01

CERTIFYING AND DECERTIFYING ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS

Section

72-06-01-01 Definitions

72-06-01-02 Certification by Secretary of State of Electronic Voting Systems

72-06-01-03 Decertification by Secretary of State of Electronic Voting Systems

72-06-01-04 Criteria for Approving Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems – Repealed

72-06-01-05 Defining a Vote on OpticalDigital Scan Ballots Used as a Part of an Electronic Voting

System

72-06-01-06 Defining a Vote on Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems – Repealed

72-06-01-07 Temporarily Defining a Vote on New Electronic Voting System, Not Otherwise

Addressed in This Chapter

72-06-01-08 Criteria for Approving Ballot Marking Devices

72-06-01-01. Definitions.

1. "Company" means any company, corporation, limited liability company, or other entity engaged

in the business of supplying electronic voting systems.

2. "EAC" means the federal election assistance commission or any entity or agency succeeding

to its function or role.

History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective July 1, 2006.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-26

72-06-01-02. Certification by secretary of state of electronic voting systems.

Prior to procurement and subsequent use in this state, a company supplying electronic voting

systems shall give written notice to the secretary of state and provide a demonstration certifying that its

system complies with applicable laws and is certified by a voting system test laboratory accredited by the

EAC. If the secretary of state approves the voting system, the secretary of state shall issue a certificate

of approval.

Any substantive changes or modifications in electronic voting systems may be certified by the

secretary of state with or without the demonstration described in this section for initial approval provided

that the modified system has been certified by a voting system test laboratory accredited by the EAC.

History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective July 1, 2006; April 1, 2008.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-10.1, 16.1-06-11, 16.1-06-14, 16.1-06-26

72-06-01-03. Decertification by secretary of state of electronic voting systems.

The secretary of state may decertify and revoke a certificate of approval of any electronic voting

system previously certified according to section 72-06-01-02 if the secretary of state becomes aware

that:

1. Any substantial modification was made to the electronic voting system that was not certified

according to section 72-06-01-02; or

2

2. Documented evidence exists showing malfunctioning by the electronic voting system that cannot be explained by user or operator error, and which the company cannot adequately or chooses not to account for.

History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective July 1, 2006.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-14, 16.1-06-26

72-06-01-04. Criteria for approving direct recording electronic voting systems.

Before the secretary of state grants a certificate of approval, the following capabilities or features of a direct recording electronic voting system must be demonstrated to the secretary of state or the secretary of state's designee upon such official's request. As used in this section, the term system means direct recording electronic voting system. The secretary of state may grant a certificate of approval for a system if the system fulfills the requirements of North Dakota Century Code section 16.1-06-14 and is approved or certified by the EAC. The secretary of state may also require that one or more of the following capabilities or features also be included in a system prior to its approval:

1. Presents the entire ballot to the voter in a series of sequential screens that include methods to ensure the voter sees all ballot options on all screens before completing the vote and allows the voter to review all ballot choices before casting a ballot;

2. Alerts the voter on the screen if the voter attempts to over vote or cross-party vote and provides information on how to correct the over vote or cross-party vote;

3. Is an electronic computer-controlled voting system that provides for direct recording and tabulating of votes cast;

4. Has a battery backup system that, at a minimum, allows voting to continue uninterrupted for two hours without external power;

5. Along with any activating and vote recording devices and components, has a unique embedded internal serial number for audit purposes;

6. Is designed to accommodate multiple ballot styles in each election precinct and multiple precincts;

7. Has a real-time clock capable of recording and documenting the total time polls are open in a precinct and capable of documenting the opening and closing of polls;

8. Complies with the disability voting requirements of the Help America Vote Act [Pub. L. 107-252; 42 U.S.C. 15301-15545];

9. For security purposes, along with each associated activating and recording device and component, employs a unique, electronically implanted election-specific internal security code such that the absence of the security code prevents substitution of any unauthorized system or related component;

10. Has a color touch-screen that is at least fifteen inches [38.1 centimeters] in diagonal measure;

11. Has an option to accommodate a wheelchair voter without intervention of the poll worker other than a minor adjustment such as the angle of the display, and the voter must be able to vote in a face-first position so that privacy is maintained with the ballot surface adjusted to a vertical position;

12. Has wheels so that the system may be easily rolled by one person on rough pavement and rolled through a standard thirty-inch [76.2-centimeter] doorframe if the net weight of the system, or aggregate of voting device parts, is over twenty pounds [9.07 kilograms];

3

13. Has a smart card-type device to activate the system for each individual voter. The election worker or voters shall be able to activate the card at the poll table with an activation device and hand the card to the voter to use on any open voting system. The card shall be rendered unusable by the voting system after the voter has cast a ballot and after a period of time has expired. There shall be a manual solution available in the event the smart card activation device or the smart card reading unit on the machine fails;

14. Prints an alphanumeric printout of the contest, candidates, position numbers, and vote totals when the polls are open so that the election workers may verify that the counters for each candidate are on zero. These printouts shall contain the system serial number and the counter total. The election worker must be able to request as many copies as needed.

The system shall include a feature to allow reports to be sent to a printer or to an excel-compatible file;

15. The system central processing unit is designed so that no executable code may be launched from random access memory. If the operating system is open or widely used, it must be an embedded system;

16. Provides an electronic, redundant storage of both the vote totals and the randomized individual ballot images. These randomized images must be able to be printed after the polls close;

17. Allows a comparison of the multiple locations of totals and ballot images to detect any errors or discrepancies. In the event of a data discrepancy, an appropriate error message shall be displayed in a text format, in order to either correct the data error or prohibit voting from continuing;

18. Has a programmable memory device that plugs into the system. This programmable memory device shall contain the ballot control information, the summary vote totals, maintenance log, operator log, and the randomized ballot images;

19. Maintains all vote totals, counter totals, audit trail ballot images, and the internal clock time in both the main memory and the removable programmable memory devices in the event the main power and battery backup power fail;

19. Has a self-contained, internal backup battery that powers all components of the system that are powered by alternating current power. In the event of a power outage in the precinct, the self-contained, internal backup battery power shall engage with no disruption of operation or loss of data. The system shall maintain all vote totals, counter totals, audit trail ballot images, and the internal clock time in both the main memory and the removable programmable memory devices in the event the main power and battery backup fail;

20. Has software that is able to run in a networked or stand-alone environment and supports early voting;

21. Has a standard or as an option, software and hardware provisions for remote transmission of election results to a central location;

22. Has internal operating system software or firmware that:

a. Is specifically designed and engineered for the election application;

b. Is contained within each touch-screen voting device;

c. Is stored in a nonvolatile memory within each terminal;

d. Includes internal quality checks such as purity or error detection and correction codes; and

e. Includes comprehensive diagnostics to ensure that failures do not go undetected;

4

23. Has a mandatory preelection testing of the ballot control logic and accuracy. The logic and accuracy test results must be stored into the memory of the main processor (central processing unit) and into the same programmable memory device that is used on election day for future reference. The test results must be stored by vote total summaries and by each individual ballot image randomly. The system must be capable of printing a zero-results printout prior to these tests and results printout after the tests; and

24. Stores tabulation of votes, ballot by ballot, in two or more memory locations on separate integrated circuit chips and shall be electronically compared throughout the election. Any differences between votes tabulated and votes stored in multiple storage locations shall be detected immediately and generate an error message defining required maintenance on the electronic voting system before the system continues to be used in the election. History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective July 1, 2006; repealed effective ?, 2021.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-14, 16.1-06-26

72-06-01-05. Defining a vote on opticaldigital scan ballots used as a part of an electronic voting system.

A voting mark that touches the oval on an opticala digital scan ballot used as a part of an electronic voting system shall be counted as if it were in the oval.

Except as provided in North Dakota Century Code section 16.1-13-25, if the voting mark does not touch the oval and is not in the oval, the vote may not be counted.A name of an individual who is eligible to be elected that is written or entered by a voter on the space provided for write-in votes shall be counted as a vote whether or not the oval is darkened and provided there exist no other marks made by the voter for that contest that would make it impossible to determine the intent of the voter. History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective July 1, 2006; amended effective ?, 2021.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-26

72-06-01-06. Defining a vote on direct recording electronic voting systems.

A vote on a direct recording electronic voting system is one that is directly recorded and tabulated on an electronic computer-controlled voting system by a method that ensures a voter sees all ballot options on all screens before completing the vote and allows the voter to review all ballot choices before casting a ballot. History: Effective March 1, 2004, repealed effective ?, 2021.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-26

72-06-01-07. Temporarily defining a vote on new electronic voting system, not otherwise addressed in this chapter.

After certifying a new electronic voting system according to section 72-06-01-01 which is not otherwise addressed in this chapter, and within sixty days following the issue of a certificate of approval by the secretary of state, the secretary of state shall temporarily define and publicize what constitutes a vote on the newly certified electronic voting system, which will govern until a permanent definition is adopted by rule. History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective July 1, 2006, amended effective ?, 2021.

General Authority: NDCC 16.1-06-26

Law Implemented: NDCC 16.1-06-26

5

72-06-01-08. Criteria for approving ballot marking devices.

Before the secretary of state grants a certificate of approval, the following capabilities or features of a ballot marking device must be demonstrated to the secretary of state or the secretary of state's designee upon such official's request. As used in this section, the term "device" means ballot marking device. The secretary of state may grant a certificate of approval for a device if the device fulfills the applicable subsection requirements of North Dakota Century Code section 16.1-06-14 and is approved or certified by the EAC. The secretary of state may also require that one or more of the following capabilities or features also be included in a system prior to its approval:

1. Presents the entire ballot to the voter in a series of sequential screens that include methods to ensure the voter sees all ballot options on all screens before completing the vote and allows the voter to review all ballot choices before casting a ballot;

2. AlertsDoes not allow the voter on the screen if the voter attempts to over vote or cross-party vote and provides information on how to correct the over vote or cross-party voteinforms the voter if a contest has been under voted;

3. Is an electronic computer-controlled voting system that provides for direct marking of the voter's choices on a paper ballot without tabulation of votes cast;

4. Has a battery backup system that, at a minimum, allows voting to continue uninterrupted for two hours without external power;

5. Is designed to accommodate multiple ballot styles in each election precinct and multiple precincts;

6. Has a real-time clock capable of recording and documenting the total time polls are open in a precinct and capable of documenting the opening and closing of polls;

7. Complies with the disability voting requirements of the Help America Vote Act [Pub. L. 107-252; 42 U.S.C. 15301-15545];

8. For security purposes, along with each associated activating and recording device and component, employs a unique, electronically implanted election-specific internal security code such that the absence of the security code prevents substitution of any unauthorized system or related component;

9. Has a color touch-screentouchscreen that is at least fifteen inches [38.1 centimeters] in diagonal measure;

10. Has an option to accommodate a wheelchair voter without intervention of the poll worker other than a minor adjustment such as the angle of the display, and the voter must be able to vote in a face-first position so that privacy is maintained with the ballot surface adjusted to a vertical position;

11. Has wheels so that the system may be easily rolled by one person on rough pavement and rolled through a standard thirty-inch [76.2-centimeter] doorframe if the net weight of the system, or aggregate of voting device parts, is over twenty pounds [9.07 kilograms];

12. Is activated by an official election ballot;

13. Upon activation is able to detect any premarked votes, and if votes are present, the device will not allow the voter to mark any additional votes with the device;

14. Has the capability to display, both visually and through voice files, the marked votes on a paper ballot for the benefit of a person who is not able to read or see the marks on the ballot and who desires an independent verification of marked votes prior to casting and tabulation of the votes;

6

🚨🚨ACTION ITEM🚨🚨

If you have already sent the audit notice request letter and are ready for the next step, or if you just ready to start with a notarized demand, print this one out:
🔸Fill in the "To:" and "From:" addresses
🔸Take it to your bank and get it notarized
🔸Be sure to put your name on the line and sign it at the end in front of the Notary.
🔸Make five photo copies
🔸Send certified mail - one to each "To:" address.
🔸Keep the original for yourself.
🔸Share this far and wide
🔸Call your representatives and let them know you have sent it because we need a forensic audit!

#California - All You Need To Rig An Election Outcome is a $1.00 Flashlight! Behold #ScanTheBallots #KinematicArtifactDetection #JovanHuttonPulitzer JOIN ME and HELP FIGHT THESE THINGS! https://jovanhuttonpulitzer.locals.com/

Staffers Confirm Establishment Republicans Know the Election was Rigged in MI and PA

Via @RealSKeshel

Numerous staffers from the MI and PA Republican parties have reached out to me privately to discuss election results not only for DJT, but for John James and Sean Parnell.

In short, these staffers confided that not only do the prominent politicians in the state who are stopping the audit efforts KNOW the elections were rigged, they are muzzling the rank and file GOP politicians who know it was rigged, threatening them with exile to useless committee work and pledging to shove them out of the party altogether if the speak up. That is how you wind up with less than a dozen GOP politicians in these two states making a fight of the issue.

The staffers all admit that internal party numbers in those two states show the same things I show - the coalition shifts were lining up for Trump blowouts of several hundred thousand votes over JB.

Corman, McBroom, Theis, Benninghoff, Cutler, and Grove are doing the work of the enemy.

- @RealSKeshel

More 👓📝 Keshel’s MI Analysis
—

My chat on Clay’s tour.