What are the names of Russian cities in other languages?
For Russians, these names sound utterly exotic!
🔔 Gateway to Russia
For Russians, these names sound utterly exotic!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙 Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's remarks at the “Dialogue on Fakes 4.0” Forum (Moscow, September 22, 2026)
Key points:
• Russia encourages professional dialogue in virtually every field, including efforts to counter the use of information as a weapon. This is particularly relevant today, when information floods every aspect of our lives and modern technology allows any news story, even one that is unverified or outright false, to reach millions, if not billions, of people almost instantly.
• I consider the staged killing of civilians in Bucha, a suburb of Kiev, to be the most cynical farce. Russian troops withdrew from the Kiev Region on March 30, 2022. Two days later, the town’s mayor appeared on television, proudly declaring that Ukraine had regained full control of Bucha and that no Russian soldiers remained there. The footage was filmed on the town’s main street. It is a wide street, and it was completely empty. Yet three days after our units withdrew, a BBC crew appeared there and broadcast a report showing that very same street, with dozens of bodies neatly laid out along its sides, dressed in remarkably clean clothes despite the mud and slush all around.
• Anti-Russian hysteria was whipped up. New sanctions were announced as punishment. As you know, then British PM Boris Johnson arrived, forbade the signing of the Istanbul peace accords and proposed simply continuing the war. He recently claimed that this was a lie. Well, he will say anything, and for next to nothing. But this is no lie – it is the truth.
• In response to the accusations against us and the sanctions, we simply requested the names of those whose bodies had been shown by the BBC, which had “conveniently turned up” in the right place at the right time. Complete silence.
• I appealed to UN Secretary-General Guterres, both in private meetings and publicly at a Security Council meeting he attended, asking him to use his authority and the means at his disposal to secure the publication of the names of those whose alleged deaths at the hands of Russian servicemen had caused such an enormous scandal. There was no response.
• We have continued to pursue this matter. Every year, I remind Guterres that he ought to explain to the international community – or at least to Russia, which has been accused of every imaginable sin – what actually happened there and whose bodies were shown. In May this year, I sent Guterres 12 very specific questions about the Bucha incident. Guterres responded to my letter containing these 12 specific questions with a perfunctory reply.
• Just a few days ago, The International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis published the initial findings of its investigation. They were announced and presented on September 17 at the TASS press centre, with the participation of the Tribunal’s Chairman and member of Russia’s Civic Chamber Maxim Grigoryev.
👉 Read the full report
• Based solely on open sources – let me stress that again – it has been established that the memorial bears dozens of names of Ukrainian armed forces servicemen, Security Service of Ukraine personnel, members of “territorial defence” units, the police and the National Guard, including militants from the nationalist Azov formation. More than 70 names have no digital footprint whatsoever, which is virtually impossible in today’s world.
❗️ I have no doubt that the truth will ultimately prevail, providing a fitting response to the West’s information aggression against the countries of the Global Majority. Russia is one of them. I would also like to make a very important point. The West’s efforts to conceal and distort the truth in the information sphere reflect a broader trend – a fear of fair competition in virtually every field of human endeavour.
Read in full
Key points:
• Russia encourages professional dialogue in virtually every field, including efforts to counter the use of information as a weapon. This is particularly relevant today, when information floods every aspect of our lives and modern technology allows any news story, even one that is unverified or outright false, to reach millions, if not billions, of people almost instantly.
• I consider the staged killing of civilians in Bucha, a suburb of Kiev, to be the most cynical farce. Russian troops withdrew from the Kiev Region on March 30, 2022. Two days later, the town’s mayor appeared on television, proudly declaring that Ukraine had regained full control of Bucha and that no Russian soldiers remained there. The footage was filmed on the town’s main street. It is a wide street, and it was completely empty. Yet three days after our units withdrew, a BBC crew appeared there and broadcast a report showing that very same street, with dozens of bodies neatly laid out along its sides, dressed in remarkably clean clothes despite the mud and slush all around.
• Anti-Russian hysteria was whipped up. New sanctions were announced as punishment. As you know, then British PM Boris Johnson arrived, forbade the signing of the Istanbul peace accords and proposed simply continuing the war. He recently claimed that this was a lie. Well, he will say anything, and for next to nothing. But this is no lie – it is the truth.
• In response to the accusations against us and the sanctions, we simply requested the names of those whose bodies had been shown by the BBC, which had “conveniently turned up” in the right place at the right time. Complete silence.
• I appealed to UN Secretary-General Guterres, both in private meetings and publicly at a Security Council meeting he attended, asking him to use his authority and the means at his disposal to secure the publication of the names of those whose alleged deaths at the hands of Russian servicemen had caused such an enormous scandal. There was no response.
• We have continued to pursue this matter. Every year, I remind Guterres that he ought to explain to the international community – or at least to Russia, which has been accused of every imaginable sin – what actually happened there and whose bodies were shown. In May this year, I sent Guterres 12 very specific questions about the Bucha incident. Guterres responded to my letter containing these 12 specific questions with a perfunctory reply.
• Just a few days ago, The International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis published the initial findings of its investigation. They were announced and presented on September 17 at the TASS press centre, with the participation of the Tribunal’s Chairman and member of Russia’s Civic Chamber Maxim Grigoryev.
👉 Read the full report
• Based solely on open sources – let me stress that again – it has been established that the memorial bears dozens of names of Ukrainian armed forces servicemen, Security Service of Ukraine personnel, members of “territorial defence” units, the police and the National Guard, including militants from the nationalist Azov formation. More than 70 names have no digital footprint whatsoever, which is virtually impossible in today’s world.
❗️ I have no doubt that the truth will ultimately prevail, providing a fitting response to the West’s information aggression against the countries of the Global Majority. Russia is one of them. I would also like to make a very important point. The West’s efforts to conceal and distort the truth in the information sphere reflect a broader trend – a fear of fair competition in virtually every field of human endeavour.
Read in full
#KievRegimeCrimes
⚡️ Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rodion Miroshnik:
💬 During the week of Russia’s State Duma elections, Ukrainian militants carried out more attacks on civilian facilities than in any other week since the start of 2026.
Kiev sought to disrupt voting in the new regions – the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, as well as the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics – by attacking polling sites.
Numerous schools, cultural centres, social facilities and administrative buildings sustained serious damage from targeted Ukrainian drone strikes. On the morning of September 20, Ukrainian terrorists deliberately destroyed a polling station at a school in Prishib, Zaporozhye Region.
On September 20, the main voting day, Ukrainian armed groups launched their largest attack on civilian targets. According to Russia’s Defence Ministry, 1,951 enemy attack drones and nine cruise missiles heading towards Moscow and the Moscow Region were destroyed over the course of the day. The attacks resulted in deaths and injuries, as well as damage to homes, industrial facilities and logistics infrastructure.
Over the past week, the highest numbers of civilian casualties from Ukrainian attacks were recorded in the Belgorod Region, the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, and the Zaporozhye, Kherson, Moscow and Rostov regions.
On September 14-20, attacks by Ukrainian Nazis resulted in 379 civilian casualties: 338 people were injured, including 18 minors, and 41 were killed, including four children.
In total, Ukrainian armed formations fired at least 8,889 munitions at civilian facilities on Russian territory over the seven days – more than 1,250 strikes a day.
⚡️ Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rodion Miroshnik:
💬 During the week of Russia’s State Duma elections, Ukrainian militants carried out more attacks on civilian facilities than in any other week since the start of 2026.
Kiev sought to disrupt voting in the new regions – the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, as well as the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics – by attacking polling sites.
Numerous schools, cultural centres, social facilities and administrative buildings sustained serious damage from targeted Ukrainian drone strikes. On the morning of September 20, Ukrainian terrorists deliberately destroyed a polling station at a school in Prishib, Zaporozhye Region.
On September 20, the main voting day, Ukrainian armed groups launched their largest attack on civilian targets. According to Russia’s Defence Ministry, 1,951 enemy attack drones and nine cruise missiles heading towards Moscow and the Moscow Region were destroyed over the course of the day. The attacks resulted in deaths and injuries, as well as damage to homes, industrial facilities and logistics infrastructure.
Over the past week, the highest numbers of civilian casualties from Ukrainian attacks were recorded in the Belgorod Region, the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, and the Zaporozhye, Kherson, Moscow and Rostov regions.
On September 14-20, attacks by Ukrainian Nazis resulted in 379 civilian casualties: 338 people were injured, including 18 minors, and 41 were killed, including four children.
In total, Ukrainian armed formations fired at least 8,889 munitions at civilian facilities on Russian territory over the seven days – more than 1,250 strikes a day.
Forwarded from Консульский департамент МИД России
В МИД России и российские загранучреждения периодически поступают обращения с просьбами помочь в розыске родственников или знакомых, связь с которыми не поддерживается уже много лет. Желание найти близкого человека может быть продиктовано как психологической потребностью, так и причинами сугубо материального характера. Например, человек может быть зарегистрирован на чьей-либо жилплощади либо числиться одним из собственников имущества, которое планируется продать. Рассказываем, какие шаги могут быть предприняты в зависимости от того, где находится разыскиваемое лицо – на территории России или за рубежом.
Forwarded from Консульский департамент МИД России
Что может МВД России
На территории Российской Федерации вопросы предоставления адресно-справочной информации относятся к компетенции Министерства внутренних дел. В сентябре с.г. вступил в силу новый административный регламент МВД России, благодаря которому возобновить контакт с человеком, находящимся в России, стало проще.
Так, обратиться с заявлением о поиске может как частное лицо, так и организация, лично или через представителя. Сделать это можно с использованием портала «Госуслуг» или в районном подразделении МВД по вопросам миграции. При наличии сведений орган МВД России направляет извещение, в котором указаны контакты заявителя, непосредственно разыскиваемому лицу. Такое лицо, при желании, само выходит на связь с инициатором его розыска.
В случаях, когда речь идет о лицах, зарегистрированных или поставленных на учет в жилом помещении, принадлежащем заявителю на праве собственности, ему может быть предоставлена адресная справка, содержащая сведения о таких лицах.
На территории Российской Федерации вопросы предоставления адресно-справочной информации относятся к компетенции Министерства внутренних дел. В сентябре с.г. вступил в силу новый административный регламент МВД России, благодаря которому возобновить контакт с человеком, находящимся в России, стало проще.
Так, обратиться с заявлением о поиске может как частное лицо, так и организация, лично или через представителя. Сделать это можно с использованием портала «Госуслуг» или в районном подразделении МВД по вопросам миграции. При наличии сведений орган МВД России направляет извещение, в котором указаны контакты заявителя, непосредственно разыскиваемому лицу. Такое лицо, при желании, само выходит на связь с инициатором его розыска.
В случаях, когда речь идет о лицах, зарегистрированных или поставленных на учет в жилом помещении, принадлежащем заявителю на праве собственности, ему может быть предоставлена адресная справка, содержащая сведения о таких лицах.
publication.pravo.gov.ru
Приказ Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации от 11.08.2026 № 568 ∙ Официальное опубликование правовых актов
Приказ Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации от 11.08.2026 № 568
"Об утверждении Административного регламента Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации по предоставлению государственной услуги "Предоставление собственнику жилого помещения…
"Об утверждении Административного регламента Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации по предоставлению государственной услуги "Предоставление собственнику жилого помещения…
Forwarded from Консульский департамент МИД России
Что может МИД России
Если же заявитель обращается в МИД России или загранучреждение Российской Федерации, чтобы найти контакты человека, выехавшего за рубеж, то ему следует иметь в виду, что действующее законодательство Российской Федерации не наделяет Министерство иностранных дел, а также дипломатические представительства и консульские учреждения полномочиями по отслеживанию передвижений граждан за рубежом и по осуществлению оперативно-розыскной деятельности.
В соответствии с частью 5 статьи 18 Консульского устава Российской Федерации консульское должностное лицо может обратиться в компетентные органы государства пребывания за содействием в розыске российского гражданина, предположительно находящегося на территории консульского округа соответствующего загранучреждения. Однако возможность получения такой информации в большинстве случаев ограничена или вовсе отсутствует в силу законодательства страны пребывания в сфере персональных данных.
Таким образом, приходится констатировать, что зачастую консульские должностные лица, стремящиеся в гуманитарных целях оказать содействие заявителю в поиске родственника или близкого, сталкиваются с проблемой отсутствия соответствующей информации. Облегчить задачу может постановка на консульский учет.
Например, если человек, уезжающий или уже уехавший за рубеж, найдет всего несколько минут, чтобы подать заявление о постановке на учет, указав необходимые контакты (сейчас это можно сделать онлайн), то в случае необходимости консул сможет связаться с разыскиваемым лицом и сообщить ему данные родственников или знакомых, заинтересованных в установлении связи с ним. Обращаем внимание, что в случае изменения контактных данных гражданин может обратиться в загранучреждение с просьбой об их актуализации в системе консульского учета.
Таким образом, постановка на консульский учет – это один из действенных инструментов, который позволит «не потеряться» и при необходимости восстановить прошлые связи.
Если же заявитель обращается в МИД России или загранучреждение Российской Федерации, чтобы найти контакты человека, выехавшего за рубеж, то ему следует иметь в виду, что действующее законодательство Российской Федерации не наделяет Министерство иностранных дел, а также дипломатические представительства и консульские учреждения полномочиями по отслеживанию передвижений граждан за рубежом и по осуществлению оперативно-розыскной деятельности.
В соответствии с частью 5 статьи 18 Консульского устава Российской Федерации консульское должностное лицо может обратиться в компетентные органы государства пребывания за содействием в розыске российского гражданина, предположительно находящегося на территории консульского округа соответствующего загранучреждения. Однако возможность получения такой информации в большинстве случаев ограничена или вовсе отсутствует в силу законодательства страны пребывания в сфере персональных данных.
Таким образом, приходится констатировать, что зачастую консульские должностные лица, стремящиеся в гуманитарных целях оказать содействие заявителю в поиске родственника или близкого, сталкиваются с проблемой отсутствия соответствующей информации. Облегчить задачу может постановка на консульский учет.
Например, если человек, уезжающий или уже уехавший за рубеж, найдет всего несколько минут, чтобы подать заявление о постановке на учет, указав необходимые контакты (сейчас это можно сделать онлайн), то в случае необходимости консул сможет связаться с разыскиваемым лицом и сообщить ему данные родственников или знакомых, заинтересованных в установлении связи с ним. Обращаем внимание, что в случае изменения контактных данных гражданин может обратиться в загранучреждение с просьбой об их актуализации в системе консульского учета.
Таким образом, постановка на консульский учет – это один из действенных инструментов, который позволит «не потеряться» и при необходимости восстановить прошлые связи.
🌐 EAEU – ASEAN: Deepening Cooperation
A meeting took place between Daniyar Imanaliev, Member of the EEC Board of Directors for Macroeconomics and Integration, and Kao Kim Hourn, Secretary-General of ASEAN.
❗Issues regarding the development of cooperation between EAEU and ASEAN countries in areas such as energy, food security, digitalization, and transport and logistics connectivity in the Eurasian region were discussed.
💬 “The cooperation program between the two integration bodies is becoming broader with each passing year. In accordance with the Cooperation Program for 2026–2030, approved last year, we are steadily expanding sectoral interaction, the main goal of which is the mutual exchange of best practices in integration development,” – noted Daniyar Imanaliev.
🤝 He also confirmed the readiness to host “EAEU-ASEAN Days” at the EEC headquarters to develop both expert dialogue and interaction between business communities.
📷: Roscongress Fund
#EAEU
A meeting took place between Daniyar Imanaliev, Member of the EEC Board of Directors for Macroeconomics and Integration, and Kao Kim Hourn, Secretary-General of ASEAN.
❗Issues regarding the development of cooperation between EAEU and ASEAN countries in areas such as energy, food security, digitalization, and transport and logistics connectivity in the Eurasian region were discussed.
💬 “The cooperation program between the two integration bodies is becoming broader with each passing year. In accordance with the Cooperation Program for 2026–2030, approved last year, we are steadily expanding sectoral interaction, the main goal of which is the mutual exchange of best practices in integration development,” – noted Daniyar Imanaliev.
🤝 He also confirmed the readiness to host “EAEU-ASEAN Days” at the EEC headquarters to develop both expert dialogue and interaction between business communities.
📷: Roscongress Fund
#EAEU
🎙 Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova's statement on the 30th anniversary of the opening for signature of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (September 24, 2026)
💬 September 24 marks the 30th anniversary of the opening for signature of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (#CTBT). This anniversary provides an excellent opportunity to take stock of the situation surrounding the CTBT.
Despite the fact that the Treaty has been ratified by 179 of the 188 states that had signed it, the prospects for the CTBT entering into force remain just as uncertain due to the position of a number of countries, primarily the US, which was one of the Treaty’s initiators, but has nevertheless failed over the decades to take effective steps towards ratifying it.
The US leadership’s claim that the draft law to that effect would not pass Congress does not stand up to scrutiny. Notably, Congress is quick to pass legislation that serves the vested interests of the US political establishment.
Things we’ve been hearing Washington say of late are of particular concern to us. President Donald Trump’s October 29, 2025 directive to begin preparations for nuclear testing is not empty rhetoric; it is effectively a direct threat to the moratorium that has helped prevent the world from sliding into a new round of the nuclear arms race.
☝️ The US attempts to accuse other countries of actions that are allegedly incompatible with the Treaty are completely unfounded. Every time we hear Washington make such statements, we know that the Americans once again intend to walk away from their international commitments.
The Russian Federation was the first of the five nuclear-weapon states to join the CTBT and did so on the day it was opened for signature, September 24, 1996.
For over 20 years now, we’ve maintained this status even as Washington failed to make any progress whatsoever towards ratifying the Treaty. However, this could not go on indefinitely.
In 2023, Russia withdrew its ratification, thus restoring parity with the US in terms of international legal commitments in this area. Russia remains a party to the CTBT, with all the rights and obligations arising from that status.
We continue to work responsibly in the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO. In December 2023, we completed the construction of the national segment of the International Monitoring System, the world’s second-largest: 32 facilities have been certified and are operational.
❗️ The Russian Federation continues to observe the voluntary moratorium on nuclear testing introduced by the Soviet Union back in 1990.
💬 On November 5, 2025, President Vladimir Putin stated expressly:
We continue to consistently follow this approach.
💬 September 24 marks the 30th anniversary of the opening for signature of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (#CTBT). This anniversary provides an excellent opportunity to take stock of the situation surrounding the CTBT.
Despite the fact that the Treaty has been ratified by 179 of the 188 states that had signed it, the prospects for the CTBT entering into force remain just as uncertain due to the position of a number of countries, primarily the US, which was one of the Treaty’s initiators, but has nevertheless failed over the decades to take effective steps towards ratifying it.
The US leadership’s claim that the draft law to that effect would not pass Congress does not stand up to scrutiny. Notably, Congress is quick to pass legislation that serves the vested interests of the US political establishment.
Things we’ve been hearing Washington say of late are of particular concern to us. President Donald Trump’s October 29, 2025 directive to begin preparations for nuclear testing is not empty rhetoric; it is effectively a direct threat to the moratorium that has helped prevent the world from sliding into a new round of the nuclear arms race.
☝️ The US attempts to accuse other countries of actions that are allegedly incompatible with the Treaty are completely unfounded. Every time we hear Washington make such statements, we know that the Americans once again intend to walk away from their international commitments.
The Russian Federation was the first of the five nuclear-weapon states to join the CTBT and did so on the day it was opened for signature, September 24, 1996.
For over 20 years now, we’ve maintained this status even as Washington failed to make any progress whatsoever towards ratifying the Treaty. However, this could not go on indefinitely.
In 2023, Russia withdrew its ratification, thus restoring parity with the US in terms of international legal commitments in this area. Russia remains a party to the CTBT, with all the rights and obligations arising from that status.
We continue to work responsibly in the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO. In December 2023, we completed the construction of the national segment of the International Monitoring System, the world’s second-largest: 32 facilities have been certified and are operational.
❗️ The Russian Federation continues to observe the voluntary moratorium on nuclear testing introduced by the Soviet Union back in 1990.
💬 On November 5, 2025, President Vladimir Putin stated expressly:
“Russia has always strictly complied with and continues to comply with its obligations under the CTBT, and we have no plans to depart from them.
However, if the US or other states parties to the treaty conduct full-scale nuclear tests, Russia will have to respond in kind”.
We continue to consistently follow this approach.
#KievRegimeCrimes
⚡️ Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rodion Miroshnik:
❗️Governor of Russia's Kursk Region Alexander Khinshtein has shared photographic evidence of another Ukrainian war crime – the destruction of St George’s Church, a historical and cultural heritage site in the Rylsk district.
The hundreds of crimes already committed by the Kiev regime against historical and religious sites make clear that the Zelensky regime has chosen to wage war on history and the faith of its forebears.
⚡️ Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rodion Miroshnik:
❗️Governor of Russia's Kursk Region Alexander Khinshtein has shared photographic evidence of another Ukrainian war crime – the destruction of St George’s Church, a historical and cultural heritage site in the Rylsk district.
According to Alexander Khinshtein, the church stood in the village of Kozino, one kilometre from the state border.
The wooden church was built in 1844, but its history goes back much further: the earliest mention dates to 1648, in a tax record. In 1662, the chapel was ravaged. In 1699, it received a new antimension and was consecrated. Over the centuries, the church on this site has perished and risen again more than once.
The hundreds of crimes already committed by the Kiev regime against historical and religious sites make clear that the Zelensky regime has chosen to wage war on history and the faith of its forebears.