13.2K subscribers
3 photos
1 video
53.3K links
🔮Science Updates Daily!
🔮Every post with Source Link!
🔮This is 24/7 Working Channel!
🔮Each post is shared from Renowned Websites!

Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/Science_News_Facts_Updates_daily

admin : @The_Lawliet
Download Telegram
Science News
An analysis of survey data covering the last five U.S. presidential election years found that ideological differences between races have decreased sharply, while differences by education have grown substantially. Less educated Americans now tend to be more…
📊 Survey analysis of the last five U.S. presidential election years (2008-2024) reveals a significant shift: ideological differences between racial groups have sharply decreased, while differences based on education have substantially grown. Less educated Americans are now leaning more conservative.

📈 The study, published in PNAS Nexus, analyzed data from over 250,000 respondents. It found that while racial groups once showed distinct ideological leanings (e.g., Black voters leaning liberal, White voters conservative), these gaps have narrowed considerably.

🎓 Conversely, educational attainment has become a more prominent divider. Individuals with a high school diploma or less, and those with some college, have become more conservative. Meanwhile, college and graduate degree holders have become more liberal, though all education levels saw a shift towards conservatism in 2024.

#PoliticalScience #USPolitics #Sociology
❤2🤯1😢1
Science News
Trump’s 2020 pivot on face masks changed Republican behavior but not their medical beliefs. By tracking reactions to President Donald Trump’s unexpected endorsement of face masks in 2020, a study found that his supporters readily adopted the behavior without…
😷 A study published in the American Sociological Review found that former President Donald Trump's endorsement of face masks in July 2020 led to a 5% increase in mask-wearing among Republicans, despite no change in their beliefs about mask effectiveness.

📈 This behavioral shift was most pronounced among Republicans in areas with high COVID-19 infection rates, suggesting that the severity of the crisis and perceived immediate danger prompted compliance with the leader's advice, bypassing the need for logical validation of the science.

🤔 The research challenges the traditional public health assumption that education alone drives behavior, indicating that populist leaders' unconventional communication styles, especially during acute stress, can be effective in prompting action without altering private convictions.

#PublicHealth #PoliticalScience #COVID19
🥴2
Science News
Forcing people to vote doesn’t make them more engaged citizens, study from Belgium finds. Removing penalties for not voting drastically reduces electoral participation but leaves a population’s political engagement and democratic attitudes largely unchanged.…
• 🗳️ Study in Public Opinion Quarterly finds mandatory voting doesn't automatically increase political interest or democratic support. Removing penalties for not voting drastically cut participation but left engagement and attitudes largely unchanged.

• 🇧🇪 Belgium's policy change in 2021 allowing Flanders to opt out of mandatory local voting in 2024 provided a unique real-world test. Turnout in Flanders plummeted from ~92% to ~63% for local elections, while remaining high (~84%) in regions with mandatory voting.

• 📊 Despite the sharp drop in voting, researchers found no significant differences in how political attitudes evolved between Flanders and the rest of Belgium. Satisfaction with democracy, political interest, and knowledge remained stable across regions.

• 🧑‍🔬 The act of voting, whether required or voluntary, doesn't appear to drive deep changes in core political attitudes. Even citizens who stopped voting after the requirement was lifted showed no measurable drop in political interest or democratic support.

#CompulsoryVoting #Democracy #PoliticalScience
Science News
Election distrust mobilizes conservatives, while liberals participate regardless of trust: Conservative voters tend to become more politically active when they distrust election systems, whereas liberal voters tend to participate at higher rates regardless…
* 🗳️ New research from Colorado State University reveals that distrust in election integrity mobilizes conservative voters into non-voting political participation (like protests or donations), while liberal voters participate at similar rates regardless of trust levels.

* 🧠 The study, published in Party Politics by Erin B. Fitz and Kyle L. Saunders, analyzed 2024 survey data, confirming previous findings that operational ideology (what people believe government should do on specific policies) is a stable foundation shaping these behaviors.

* 🏛️ Operational conservatives with low election trust showed significantly higher political activity compared to those who trusted the process, suggesting distrust acts as a primary motivator for this group.

#PoliticalScience #ElectionIntegrity #CivicEngagement

(⚠️ Formatting disabled due to Markdown error)
❤1
Science News
Voters spend greater mental energy defending politicians from their own party and finding faults in politicians from the opposing party when faced with news of criminal convictions. Read Full Article #PoliticalPsychology #CognitiveDissonance #VoterBehavior
🗳️ Political loyalty shapes how voters perceive criminal convictions of politicians and their family members, a new study reveals. Partisans tend to defend their own party's figures and criticize opponents, viewing legal proceedings through a biased lens.

🧠 Research published in the American Behavioral Scientist shows that voters use "motivated reasoning" and "identity-motivated elaboration," applying more mental energy to excuse their party's controversies and criticize opposing ones.

🎓 A study with 231 university students during the 2024 election context found that Republican participants generated more positive thoughts to defend Donald Trump, while Democrats focused more on negative thoughts about Trump's convictions.

⚖️ Conversely, Democrats showed higher positive elaboration defending Hunter Biden, while Republicans generated more negative thoughts against him. Stronger party identification amplified these biased responses.

#PoliticalScience #USPolitics #Election2024
Science News
Prior research suggests that people on the left tend to be less inclined toward aggression, thanks to traits like empathy. The arrest of Luigi Mangione, following the assassination of the UnitedHealthcare CEO, led to an increase in support for partisan violence…
✅ A study in Public Opinion Quarterly found that highly publicized, morally framed violence can shift public attitudes. The arrest of Luigi Mangione after the UnitedHealthcare CEO assassination led to increased support for partisan violence among Democrats.

✅ Researchers Chiara Vargiu and Alessandro Nai used a two-wave survey (Sept-Dec 2024) of 3,100 American adults to analyze shifts in public opinion following the December 4, 2024, assassination.

✅ The study revealed that a narrative framing the perpetrator as a "folk hero" was more influential than the act of violence itself. Democrats specifically became more supportive of violence against Republicans, demonstrating how non-partisan acts can be filtered through partisan lenses in a polarized US.

✅ The research, published in "Partisan Differences in Support for Political Violence: Results from a Natural Experiment in the United States," emphasizes that compelling narratives can sway public opinion, not inherent tendencies toward violence in any particular group.

#PoliticalScience #PublicOpinion #SocialTrends
😍3
Science News
Study of people’s responses to anti-immigration message from Nigel Farage found applause and laughter led to positive response from viewers, while mixed laughter and booing was damaging. How content creators use applause and booing shape public perceptions…
👍 Positive audience reactions like applause and laughter can make controversial political messages, such as Nigel Farage's anti-immigration statements, appear more acceptable to viewers.

👎 Conversely, mixed audience reactions of laughter and booing were found to be particularly damaging, significantly reducing how pleasant viewers perceived the message to be.

👀 Research from Aston University, collaborating with the University of Arkansas and Texas Tech University, shows that contextual cues like audience reactions can subtly influence public perception without altering the message itself.

🇺🇸🇬🇧 Viewer ideology and country of origin also played a role, with more conservative participants and those in the US generally rating Nigel Farage more favorably.

#PoliticalScience #MediaResearch #PublicOpinion
👏1🤣1
Science News
Losing an election is associated with lower social trust among polarized voters. Following a national election, voters whose preferred political party loses tend to experience a noticeable decline in their generalized trust of other people in society. Read…
🗳️ Losing a national election can decrease a voter's general trust in others by approximately 3.8%, a gap that widens to about 6 percentage points when comparing winners to supporters of the main opposition party.

😥 This decline in trust is most pronounced (nearly 10 percentage points) among optimistic losers who confidently expected their party to win, suggesting pre-election expectations significantly shape post-election attitudes.

😠 Highly polarized voters who intensely dislike opposing parties experience a trust gap of around 10 percentage points between winners and losers, indicating their distrust is amplified by strong negative feelings toward rival partisans.

#ElectoralStudies #SocialTrust #PoliticalScience
The political gender gap may be growing more slowly than headlines suggest. New research finds that while young men and women are diverging politically in some countries, the trend is often overstated and varies significantly across datasets and generations.

Read Full Article

#PoliticalScience #GenderGap #PublicOpinion
Science News
For Republicans, watching or reading more liberal news was linked to lower meta-prejudice and meta-dehumanization. For Democrats, higher exposure to conservative news was associated with lower meta-prejudice. When Republicans consumed more conservative news…
- 📰 Consuming news from outside your own political or religious group may reduce exaggerated beliefs about how much those groups dislike you. New research indicates that exposure to "outgroup" media is linked to feeling more connected to those individuals, leading to the assumption they view your group more favorably.

- 📊 A study involving 2,707 American adults found that for Republicans, watching more liberal news was associated with lower "meta-prejudice" (exaggerated dislike) and "meta-dehumanization" (viewing others as less evolved). For Democrats, higher exposure to conservative news was linked to lower meta-prejudice. Interestingly, Republicans consuming more conservative news reported higher meta-dehumanization.

- 🤝 In Israel, exposure to ultra-Orthodox news was linked to lower meta-prejudice and meta-dehumanization for both secular and ultra-Orthodox participants, suggesting this effect is stronger in groups with equal status and power.

- 🧠 A third study of 761 American adults explored the psychological link: exposure to outgroup news was associated with stronger "political parasocial relationships" (imagined connection), which in turn led to less extreme assumptions about the opposing group's negative views.

#MediaPsychology #PoliticalScience #SocialConnection
👍1😁1
Republicans are more likely than Democrats to support political violence. Political violence, “the use of physical force to advance political objectives,” includes targeted and terrorist violence. Republicans endorsed violence for a greater number of specific political objectives than Democrats.

Read Full Article

#PoliticalViolence #RepublicansVsDemocrats #PoliticalScience
🤡4🔥3😁2👎1👏1🥱1💯1
Members of right‑leaning parties prefer leaders with ‘dark triad’ personality traits - narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, suggests a new UK study.

Read Full Article

#Psychology #PoliticalScience #DarkTriad
💅2💯1🤨1
Science News
A new study reveals that voters use a politician's everyday lifestyle choices, such as their vehicle or restaurant preferences, as mental shortcuts to infer their political leanings, but only when explicit political information is missing. Read Full Article…
🚗 Voters use nonpolitical lifestyle clues like favorite restaurants or cars to gauge a politician's stance, but only when formal political details are unavailable.

☕ In experiments, when political party information was omitted, lifestyle signals (e.g., owning a hunting store vs. an organic cafe) were as influential as explicit party labels in guiding voter decisions.

❌ Contradictory lifestyle signals (e.g., a Republican candidate with liberal habits) can negate a candidate's party advantage and confuse voters.

#PoliticalScience #VoterBehavior #USPolitics
🤣1
Science News
Political rhetoric by members of US Congress has become more partisan and negative as social media usage has increased, with this growth in partisanship disproportionately driven by Republicans, finds new study that analyzed 4.7 million tweets, 2.4 million…
* 📊 A new study analyzed over 4.7 million tweets, 2.4 million Facebook posts, and 184,000 email newsletters from U.S. Congress members between 2009-2022.

* 📈 Rhetoric has become significantly more partisan and negative across all platforms, with Republicans showing a more pronounced increase in partisan language compared to Democrats.

* 🚀 Social media engagement data reveals that negative and partisan messages receive substantially more likes, retweets, and comments, potentially influencing the types of messages elected officials prioritize.

#PoliticalScience #SocialMedia #USPolitics

(⚠️ Formatting disabled due to Markdown error)
🥱2❤1💯1
Science News
Study identifies the values most strongly associated with rejecting antidemocratic politicians, offering new insight into why some voters resist leaders who challenge democratic norms. Read Full Article #DemocracyValues #AntiAuthoritarian #VoterBehavior
* 🏛️ A new study reveals that strong personal commitment to liberal democratic principles can help voters resist politicians who threaten democratic rules, even when party loyalty is high.

* 📊 Research led by Christopher Claassen, involving 5,951 participants across the US, Poland, and South Korea, found that backing for core institutions like free speech and the rule of law was the most consistent predictor of choosing pro-democratic candidates in simulated elections.

* ⚖️ Even in challenging scenarios where a voter might choose between a pro-democratic candidate from an opposing party and an anti-democratic candidate from their own, support for liberal democracy increased the likelihood of choosing the pro-democratic option by 2-12 percentage points.

#Democracy #PoliticalScience #Research

(⚠️ Formatting disabled due to Markdown error)
❤1🤮1
New study says Trump did not get a 2024 mandate for sweeping change. Win was modest by history, most voters didn’t see it as a green light for big overhauls, he didn’t campaign on many later moves, and the public opposed most of those policies (agency cuts, mass deportations, tariffs).

Read Full Article

#PoliticalScience #ElectionScience #PublicOpinionPolls
🥱3
Science News
As America shifted left under Trump, emotional hostility widened the partisan gap Read Full Article #Polarization #PoliticalScience #PublicOpinion
🗳️ During Donald Trump's first term (2016-2020), American public opinion generally shifted left, primarily due to Democrats and Independents changing views on specific issues.

📈 Meanwhile, emotional dislike between the two main political parties intensified, with Republicans showing a significant increase in warmth towards their own party and increased coolness towards Democrats.

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Individual voters who felt more animosity towards the opposing party were more likely to adopt their own party's policy stances on key issues.

📊 Research by Alan Yang and Robert Y. Shapiro, published in American Politics Research, used data from the 2016-2020 ANES and GSS to track these opinion and sentiment shifts.

#PublicOpinion #USPolitics #PoliticalScience
👍1
Science News
Americans often fail to notice when Democrats and Republicans are moving in the same direction. New research suggests that people frequently fail to notice how much support for certain social issues has grown within both parties. Read Full Article #Cro…
* 🔬 **Shared Opinion Growth:** Research in *Political Psychology* shows that when people learn about social issues where both parties' support is growing, they tend to see more future common ground and feel warmer towards opponents. Participants often underestimate how much opinions have changed in both parties.

* 📊 **Focus on Trends:** A refined message focusing *solely* on how support has grown for issues over time (removing current gap data) significantly increased expected common ground and positive feelings toward the opposing party. This refined message showed a 6.6-point increase in outparty warmth.

* 💡 **Framing Matters:** The way information is presented is crucial. Simply highlighting current divisions can worsen polarization. Emphasizing trends of shared movement, without reminding people of the present gap, appears more effective in reducing partisan hostility.

#PoliticalScience #SocialIssues #OpinionPolling

(⚠️ Formatting disabled due to Markdown error)
Science News
Study on ~2,000 US adults during the 2024 election found that political anger does not automatically translate to voting; instead, it depends on efficacy, or the belief people can influence a political outcome Read Full Article #PoliticalEngagement #PoliticalEfficacy…
🗳️ New MSU research shows anger alone doesn't guarantee voter turnout for the 2026 elections. It depends on people believing they can influence outcomes.

⚡ Political anger can drive activism, but only if individuals feel empowered to act and see a clear path to change. Extreme anger, however, can reduce voting interest if people feel powerless.

✅ The study surveyed nearly 2,000 U.S. adults before the 2024 election, finding that for anger to mobilize action, a credible pathway to participation must be offered.

#PoliticalScience #VoterTurnout #MSUResearch