Looks like a good route to take to build a bigger community.👇👇
Forwarded from Palmer (Palmer Davis)
We are rapidly expanding our website for employees resisting mandatory jabs.
Lawyers need data on how many are resisting. Please register if you haven't already (the process has been streamlined):
https://employeesforinformedconsent.com/register/
What you can do: https://employeesforinformedconsent.com/what-you-can-do/
Lawyers need data on how many are resisting. Please register if you haven't already (the process has been streamlined):
https://employeesforinformedconsent.com/register/
What you can do: https://employeesforinformedconsent.com/what-you-can-do/
With a majority of the legislature and the governor obviously against this bill, it is DOA. Still, it is worth a shot to let our voice be heard. Unfortunately, lawsuits may be the only way.👇👇
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Please share with Washington state residents you know! If you support medical freedom you must sign this Washington State bill. The legislature could call a special session and pass this bill tomorrow (Aug 19)! This needs to be shared like wildfire! -Click on "comment on this bill" -Complete the form all the way to the bottom -Click "support" -Enter your comment -Scroll back up & click "verify my district" -Click your legislators -Submit form
https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5144&Year=2021&fbclid=IwAR0JU-UXxr5g-f3tOGw6W1u-V3tkF9a0t7vSfS6_8QCc-BdJ-P1NKN321WA
https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5144&Year=2021&fbclid=IwAR0JU-UXxr5g-f3tOGw6W1u-V3tkF9a0t7vSfS6_8QCc-BdJ-P1NKN321WA
Urgent!
If you support medical freedom you must sign this Washington State bill. The legislature could call a special session. This needs to be shared like wildfire!
-Click on "comment on this bill"
-Complete the form all the way to the bottom
-Click "support"
-Enter your comment
-Scroll back up & click "verify my district"
-Click your legislators
-Submit form
https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5144&Year=2021
Washington State Legislature
app.leg.wa.gov
If you support medical freedom you must sign this Washington State bill. The legislature could call a special session. This needs to be shared like wildfire!
-Click on "comment on this bill"
-Complete the form all the way to the bottom
-Click "support"
-Enter your comment
-Scroll back up & click "verify my district"
-Click your legislators
-Submit form
https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5144&Year=2021
Washington State Legislature
app.leg.wa.gov
Forwarded from ⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽 (Publius)
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1428332385192615938?s=09. The Cruzan court goes on to explain:
At common law, even the touching of one person by another without consent and without legal justification was a battery. See W. Keeton, D. Dobbs, R. Keeton, & D. Owen, Prosser and Keeton on Law of Torts § 9, pp. 39-42 (5th ed. 1984). Before the turn of the century, this Court observed that “no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.” Union Pacific R. Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251, 35 L. Ed. 734, 11 S. Ct. 1000 (1891). This notion of bodily integrity has been embodied in the requirement that informed consent is generally required for medical treatment. Justice Cardozo, while on the Court of Appeals of New York, aptly described this doctrine: “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages.” Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 129-130, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (1914). The informed consent doctrine has become firmly entrenched in American tort law. See Keeton, Dobbs, Keeton, & Owen, supra, § 32, pp. 189-192; F. Rozovsky, Consent to Treatment, A Practical Guide 1-98 (2d ed. 1990).
At common law, even the touching of one person by another without consent and without legal justification was a battery. See W. Keeton, D. Dobbs, R. Keeton, & D. Owen, Prosser and Keeton on Law of Torts § 9, pp. 39-42 (5th ed. 1984). Before the turn of the century, this Court observed that “no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.” Union Pacific R. Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251, 35 L. Ed. 734, 11 S. Ct. 1000 (1891). This notion of bodily integrity has been embodied in the requirement that informed consent is generally required for medical treatment. Justice Cardozo, while on the Court of Appeals of New York, aptly described this doctrine: “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages.” Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 129-130, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (1914). The informed consent doctrine has become firmly entrenched in American tort law. See Keeton, Dobbs, Keeton, & Owen, supra, § 32, pp. 189-192; F. Rozovsky, Consent to Treatment, A Practical Guide 1-98 (2d ed. 1990).
Twitter
Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
Australia twitter.com/CaldronPool/st…
Approve, Review, and Implement took a whopping 2-3 months... Liar
Stay vigilant. This battle is not even close to over. They will push and push and push until you give in or they lose. Remember, they said “legitimate” exemption. That means they reserve the right to decide whether or not you meet their definition. Be ready for a fight if you’re serious about taking a stance for medical freedom.
Forwarded from Patriots85
From OSPI website. Pay close attention to the language. I’m specifically concerned about the end: Considerations of an undue hardship. Under that section, safety concerns and security considerations could be used to make a religious accommodation irrelevant. Notice the governors newest talking point about the changing demographics of people getting sick-kids?!?
After everything I’ve seen and hoped for, this website offers what is likely the best option. Though the mandate is likely illegal, this letter seems to be the best way forward. 👇👇👇