The Fed's 2-day meeting starts today.

No rate cut is expected ✂️

The real story is Kevin Warsh's first meeting as Fed chair. Markets will be listening closely for any hints about future easing and liquidity.

One sentence can move everything.
Buckle up 🍿

James Wynn just opened a 10x short on SpaceX 🚀

🔠 Entry: $214.11
🔠 Liquidation: $224.31
🔗 Live position

Not exactly far away considering how hard this rocket has been flying lately.

🤓 Looking at the chart, I can actually see the logic behind the trade:

📉 The $220-225 area has already acted as a rejection zone twice, and that's exactly where Wynn's liquidation sits. If buyers can't push through that level, a cooldown toward $190-200 wouldn't be surprising after such a vertical move
📈 On the flip side, a clean break above $225 could trigger another squeeze and send the perp into full price discovery mode

The timing is interesting too. We have the Fed meeting ahead, plus the Iran-US memorandum expected on Friday. That's plenty of macro fuel for volatility.

Personally, I wouldn't be surprised by a pullback here.

🤩 But DYOR: shorting one of the strongest charts on the market with 10x leverage is still a bold move

We've seen this before with BTC. Now I'm curious how it plays out with SpaceX 👀

In just a few trading sessions, SPCX surged to roughly a $2.7T valuation, overtaking Amazon and even briefly flipping Microsoft intraday. That pushed SpaceX into the top 5 most valuable companies in the world almost immediately after its IPO 💹

My take?

I think the biggest reason SPCX keeps ripping is simple: only about 5% of shares are actually trading, while roughly 95% remain locked up. There's plenty of demand, but very little supply – and until those unlocks start hitting the market, sellers don't have much pressure to push the price lower.

The first major unlock is expected in August. That's when things start getting interesting

Today we’re waiting for the Fed rate decision and listening closely to what Warsh says. Let’s see how markets react 📊

Everyone wants a personal AI agent that trades for them, finds profitable strategies and somehow prints $10k/month. But CertiK’s CEO has already warned: unisolated, unvetted AI agents are a massive security disaster waiting to happen.

AI agents can drain your wallet 😱

And honestly, it makes sense. People often give agents access to everything: files, email, databases, wallets, API keys and financial services. If that agent is not isolated, it can be manipulated through plain text – through a hidden instruction inside a PDF, an email, or even a website.

So the agent thinks it’s completing your task. But in reality, it may be following someone else’s command, leaking data, or signing the wrong transaction 💀

AI agents are powerful. But without limits, permissions and isolation, your "assistant" can become the fastest way to lose money.

Want me to show how to safely test AI agents without putting your wallet at risk? Smash the reactions and I'll put together a practical guide 🔥

AI agent security FAQ: how to test agents without getting drained? 😵

AI agents are useful. But the dangerous part is the access you give them. If your agent can read files, open links, use API keys and sign transactions, then one hidden prompt inside a PDF, email or website can become a real security problem. So before testing trading agents, I’d use a setup like this:

1️⃣ Start with read-only access

If the agent is only doing research, it does not need trading access. For market analysis, portfolio tracking or alerts, use:
🔺 read-only exchange API keys
🔺 no withdrawal permissions
🔺 no wallet signing
🔺 no access to your main email or cloud drive.
If the agent can’t move funds, it can’t drain funds

2️⃣ Separate your agent wallet

Never connect an AI agent to your main wallet. Create a separate hot wallet only for testing. Keep the main funds on a hardware wallet or a wallet that the agent never touches.
A simple rule:
Main wallet = storage
Agent wallet = sandbox
If you want to test real transactions, fund it with a small fixed amount you are ready to lose

3️⃣ Use limits everywhere

If you give the agent trading access, limit the damage in advance. Set:
🔺 max position size
🔺 daily loss limit
🔺 max order size
🔺 no withdrawals
🔺 IP whitelist if the exchange supports it
🔺 manual approval for large trades.
The agent should never be able to YOLO your full balance because one website told it to

4️⃣ Keep human approval for signatures

A safer setup is:
🔺 AI agent prepares the action
🔺 You review it
🔺 You sign manually
Before signing, use transaction simulation tools like Rabby, Pocket Universe or similar wallet security extensions. If the transaction looks confusing, don’t sign

5️⃣ Clean permissions after tests

After testing any agent, revoke old approvals. Useful tools:
🔺 Revoke.cash – check and revoke token approvals
🔺 Etherscan / chain explorers – review wallet activity
🔺 Scam Sniffer / Pocket Universe / Rabby – catch suspicious transactions before signing.
Most wallet drains happen because users forget what they approved weeks ago

6️⃣ Log everything

If an agent trades or interacts with wallets, you should be able to see:
🔺 what it read
🔺 what it decided
🔺 what command it executed
🔺 which API key it used
🔺 which wallet it touched
No logs = no control

AI agents should be treated like junior traders with internet access. Useful, fast, sometimes impressive – but absolutely not someone you give the master key to your portfolio.

📌 Bookmark this guide and forward it to all your vibecoder friends

#FAQ

"The Iranians laughed at Obama and called him a stupid SOB a total fool," Trump said at the G7, roasting Barack Obama’s 2015 nuclear deal and signing his own. The deal is simple: Iran gets sanctions relief, frozen assets unlocked and a $300B recovery fund. In return, it has to give up its nuclear program.

✂️ Meanwhile, the Fed kept rates unchanged at 3.50%-3.75% in a unanimous decision.

It was Warsh’s first FOMC meeting as Fed chair, and the message was pretty clear: inflation is still well above the Fed’s 2% target, prices are still too high for most people, and the Fed wants to "fix five years of inflation mistakes."

The interesting part?
Under Powell, the Fed usually tried to tell markets what was coming next. Under Warsh, that playbook may be gone 😠

@Coin_Post

AI can now analyze almost any stock like a Wall Street (for free) 👁

I've been using the prompt below to research stocks before adding them to my watchlist. It gives results much closer to how professional investors think. Not "What does this company do?" but "Where could the market be wrong, and how much can I make or lose if I'm right?"

👇 Just replace [TICKER] with any company:

You are a top-tier hedge fund analyst.
Analyze [TICKER] as if you are deciding whether to invest $1,000,000 of your own money and hold for 5+ years.

Do not write a generic company overview. Focus on whether this is an attractive investment today. Use the latest available information and think like an investor, not a journalist.

Answer the following:

1. What is the market consensus?
What does the average investor currently believe about this company? Why is the stock priced where it is today?

2. What is already priced in?
What assumptions about growth, margins, AI, new products, competition, or macro conditions are embedded in the current valuation?

3. What could the market be wrong about?
Identify 3-5 things that investors may be underestimating or overestimating.

4. Why could this stock outperform?
What realistic events could generate a 2x-5x return over the next 5 years?

5. Why could this stock fail?
What realistic events could cause a 50%+ drawdown or permanent capital loss?

6. Competitive position
Is this company getting stronger or weaker relative to competitors? Who is taking market share and why?

7. Financial quality
Evaluate:
* Revenue growth
* Margins
* Free cash flow
* Debt
* Capital allocation
* Return on invested capital
Focus on trends, not just current numbers.

8. Management
Does management create shareholder value?
Evaluate execution, incentives, capital allocation, acquisitions, dilution, and buybacks.

9. Valuation
Do not simply state P/E ratios.
Estimate:
* Bear case value
* Base case value
* Bull case value
For each scenario provide:
* Expected stock price
* Probability
* Key assumptions

10. Expected return
Based on your analysis, estimate:
* Expected annual return over the next 5 years
* Downside risk
* Risk/reward ratio

11. Investment decision
If you had to choose between:
* Buying [TICKER]
* Holding cash
* Buying the S&P 500
Which would you choose and why?

12. Final verdict
Provide:
Conviction score (1-10)
Investment rating:
* Strong Buy
* Buy
* Hold
* Avoid

Most important reasons supporting the decision.
Most important reasons that could make the thesis wrong.

End with one sentence:
"The market is probably right because..."
and
"The market is probably wrong because..."

Most viral "Wall Street AI prompts" just generate a nice-looking report. This one forces the model to look for mispricing – and that’s where real investors make money

❤️ Save this. You'll probably use it more than half the finance newsletters on your feed

No cameras. No wearables.
Just Wi-Fi reading how your body moves 📡

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon trained an AI model to turn ordinary Wi-Fi signals into detailed maps of human posture – even in the dark or when a person is partly hidden.

The real use case isn’t just surveillance. This could help detect falls, monitor elderly people without filming them, improve smart homes and assist rescuers in places where cameras can’t see.

Pretty useful. Buuuut... now they’ll be able to watch us through walls? 👀

#AI

BTC is back at the long-term trendline that has caught several previous "Bitcoin is dead" moments 🟠

Funny how every cycle feels different, but the emotions are almost always the same: fear, frustration and the feeling that BTC will never recover. We may not be at the exact bottom yet, but the setup looks very familiar

What’s your take?
🐳 BTC is cheap – buying
🕊 BTC is "dead" – not buying

FAQ Note: cross margin vs isolated margin ❓

🟦 Isolated margin means only the money assigned to one position is at risk. Example: You have $1,000 on the exchange and open a trade with $100 of isolated margin. If it gets liquidated, you lose that $100 – not your entire futures balance

🟦 Cross margin works differently: The exchange can use your available balance to keep the position open. This moves liquidation further away and may help you survive a wick, but if price keeps moving against you, the trade can eat into the rest of your account

So cross margin isn’t automatically safer. It simply gives the position access to more of your funds. For beginners, isolated is usually easier to control because the maximum risk is clearer

✅ Before opening a perp trade, check:
🔺 Isolated or cross
🔺 Liquidation price
🔺 Stop-loss placement
🔺 Total account balance at risk

My rule is simple: I use isolated margin when testing a trade idea. If I use cross margin, I treat my entire futures balance as being at risk 🧠

#FAQ

XLM ripped nearly 80%, trading volume jumped almost 900%, and around $34M in shorts got wiped out. Meanwhile, DTCC, Citi and T. Rowe Price suddenly entered the chat 💵

So was this the start of something bigger – or just another short squeeze wrapped in institutional headlines? 🤔

In the new video, I break down what actually pushed XLM higher, why Citi’s $8T tokenization forecast matters, and the one uncomfortable detail that could completely change the bullish case.

The headlines say institutional adoption.
The chart tells a slightly different story.

👇 Full breakdown is live on YouTube
📹 WATCH HERE

One more drop before the real bounce – fresh calls from crypto influencers 📊

➡️ Crypto Rover (216k)
📉 14 hours ago: BTC may first sweep liquidity around $60k, with a deeper move into the $58k-$47k range still possible. Lower oil prices and easier Fed policy could help confirm that the cycle bottom is forming

➡️ Crypto Banter (1.18m)
📉 1 day ago: BTC may set a local low near $58k by early next week before entering accumulation and recovering strongly in Q3. ETH could reach $1.4k, SOL $56-$60 and INJ around $4 before the bounce

➡️ Altcoin Daily (1.65m)
📈 1 day ago: BTC still looks like a strong buy while it holds the 200-week moving average. But a close below that level could trigger another 20% drop, similar in scale to the FTX crash

➡️ Jason Pizzino (360k)
📉 1 day ago: BTC could fall into the $43k-$58k range as interest in the asset continues to fade. A real bull-market shift would require a long accumulation phase and a recovery above $66k-$71k

➡️ Coin Bureau Trading (109k)
📉 1 day ago: BTC’s bear flag was confirmed after losing $64k, with the main target around $45.8k–$46.3k. The setup is invalidated if price closes back inside the old flag, while 13% stablecoin dominance could mark final capitulation

Think the bottom is getting close? Hit 🔥

@Coin_Post

One wallet habit I strongly recommend: clean up your old permissions at least once a month 🧹

Every time you use a DEX, bridge or mint, you may give a smart contract permission to move tokens from your wallet. Some of those approvals are unlimited and can stay active for years. And disconnecting the wallet from the site doesn’t remove them.

If that contract gets hacked – or the approval was malicious from the start – your tokens may still be exposed. In January 2026 alone, signature-phishing attacks drained $6.27M from 4,741 users, up 207% from December

My cleanup is simple:
✅ remove contracts I no longer use
✅ revoke unknown and unlimited token approvals
✅ clear old bridge, DEX and NFT permissions
✅ check again after testing a new dApp

🔧 Tools that can help:
✅ Revoke.cash
✅ Etherscan Token Approval Checker
✅ DeBank – check the Approvals section

Revoking usually costs a small gas fee, but it doesn’t sell or move your tokens

If this was useful, drop a 🐳 reaction

#FAQ

Bullish again 💹

🟠 BTC pushed through $65.5k, while roughly $200B was added to the US stock market in the first five minutes of trading.

Green candles are nice, but take a look at how much liquidity is still sitting around $60k-$62k 👀

Those clusters tend to act like magnets, so I wouldn’t be surprised if BTC revisits that zone before making its next clean move

@Coin_Post

Markets opened green… and then came the dump 📉

Around $500B was wiped from the US stock market, with $220B erased from SpaceX alone today

Bitcoin is still holding up surprisingly well during this massive tech sell-off, but it has lost a key local level. A close below it could send BTC toward $63,250 in the near term 🌡

Who here actually trades Bitcoin? Drop a 🐳 – let’s see how many of us are in the room

China just showed off its mosquito-sized combat drones – tiny insect-like machines designed for stealth reconnaissance 🦟

Each one weighs less than 0.3 grams, flaps its wings up to 500 times per second, and can carry tiny sensors for surveillance.

There’s just one small problem: a strong gust of wind can blow them away 😁

Just like I said yesterday, BTC moved almost exactly along my white arrow 😎

It broke below the local $63,250 level and headed straight toward the liquidity zone I also mentioned yesterday. BTC has bounced from that area for now, but I still think it may want to go lower and sweep the big stack of stops around $60k

Meanwhile, global markets are still getting hammered:
➖ Asian markets: more than $1.5T wiped out within hours as tech stocks sold off
➖ US stocks: another $1.5T erased in the first five minutes after the open

The indices have clawed back some of the losses, but the flow tells the real story – investors are cutting risk and rotating into safer corners of the market.

And Bitcoin? Almost no reaction. It’s even up a little 💪

Remember Murad Mahmudov and that memecoin portfolio that was supposed to make him filthy rich?

It peaked at $62.42m and is now worth around $11.39m – down 82% from the top, a roughly $51m wipeout 🌡

I also remember everyone waiting for Trump to take office and make us all millionaires 🇺🇸 Then came dump after dump… and our bags haven’t exactly been doing great since

At this point, all we need is the White House and the Department of War to start posting PEPE 😁