📹 We broke this idea down on video

In order: the daily range and its equilibrium, the order flow zone the correction reached, the liquidity sweep taken in the upper half — and the zone of highest traded volume that formed right after it. That zone is the confirmation of seller strength.

One correction to the breakdown above: point A is 1.38701, the upper edge of that zone, not 1.33785. The hypothesis breaks where the liquidity was taken, not at the fractal.

🔗 Free indicator: https://www.tradingview.com/script/eXlTQAd9-Focusprofit-Market-Structure/

📹 Breakdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLl8AnMPAZ8

$AMZN · The zone stayed untouched — and the plan worked

Amazon, a random bar from 2012. The first stock in the practice instead of a currency pair: the method does not depend on the instrument, and that is worth testing. The trend from the last two trade ranges, a reaction from a weekly fractal, a most traded volume zone as point A and the established high as point B — then the check with the indicator.

The ending is a rare one. The usual demonstration is «price came into the zone and left from there». Here price never came back to the zone and went for the target from the current marks. The plan worked without a retest — and that is a scenario too.

▶️ Watch the breakdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR6pMpWmCYk
📄 Practice on the site: https://focusprofit.pro/practice/

🆓 Free structure markup indicator in the TradingView library: https://www.tradingview.com/script/eXlTQAd9-Focusprofit-Market-Structure/

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice. Trading involves risk.

What is new in Trade Model: order flows and the strength rank

A new version of the indicator is out. Before, it showed the dealing range and domination, while the question «where does the correction end» stayed open — everyone answered it by hand.

Now the order flow zones have a strength rank. It is computed from imbalance and price travel rather than assigned by eye, and it is drawn as stars right on the chart.

The walkthrough runs on a random bar in the history — Amazon, weekly. Random on purpose, so that a convenient example could not be picked.

▶️ Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbGsoL51rdY
📄 About the indicator: https://focusprofit.pro/indicator/

🆓 Free indicator in the TradingView library — https://www.tradingview.com/script/eXlTQAd9-Focusprofit-Market-Structure/

$NAS100 · There was no strength in that zone — and the target was taken anyway

NAS100, a random bar from 2014. The trend is confirmed by the last two trade ranges, then a weekly liquidity sweep in the discount zone and a weekly reaction zone.

The most honest moment is said out loud in the recording: price came into an order flow, but there is no strength in it, the stronger one sits lower. The weak element was named before the resolution, together with the fallback zone — and the plan still worked, because the criterion was met by the other elements.

The target is the established high of the weekly range, 4,691.0. The level was taken.

▶️ Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4R58CFGVms
📄 Practice: https://focusprofit.pro/practice/

🆓 Free structure markup indicator: https://www.tradingview.com/script/eXlTQAd9-Focusprofit-Market-Structure/

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice. Trading involves risk.

Six weeks ago we named the invalidation level. It was never needed

On 9 July we reviewed gold: price in the discount of the weekly range, a reaction from the weekly fractal, priority — a corrective long. The target was named as a number, 4595.32. The invalidation was named as a number too, 3941.75. Both before the outcome, not after it.

The target was reached, the idea played out. The invalidation level stayed untouched.

A review that explains a move after the fact is worth nothing: any chart reads well in hindsight. The value is where the place of the mistake is named in advance and by a single level.

And the interesting part: a review of a new gold idea goes out tonight. Its invalidation level is the same 3941.75.

📊 Review with the outcome
🔗 Free indicator in the TradingView library

Gold: the correction reached the order flow zone

A review of XAUUSD on the weekly and the daily. Published on 26 August — before the outcome, not after it.

Price pulled back from the January high and sits in the discount of the weekly range. The correction reached the weekly order flow zone, 4381.51 — 3886.28, and reacted from the monthly fractal at 4097.98 inside it.

Buyer strength is confirmed by the most traded volume zones — the weekly one, 4543.42 — 3941.75, and the daily one, 4330.99 — 3941.75. Both share one lower boundary, and it is the invalidation level.

The priority is a return to the range high, 5597.04. Invalidation is a candle body closing below 3941.75.

The place where the idea stops being valid is named in advance and by a single level — before the outcome, not after it.

▶️ Watch the review
📄 Market reviews on the site
📊 The review on TradingView
🆓 Free indicator

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice. Trading involves risk.

$TSLA · Marked it by hand — then checked ourselves with the indicator

TSLA, the weekly chart, a random bar from 2017. The trend, two trade ranges, a liquidity sweep in the discount zone and the weekly zone of increased traded volume — W MTV on the chart.

The most honest moment of the read: the second range is marked badly at first. There is a reaction, but the liquidity is not taken — so the border is set wrong. That is said out loud and redone right in the recording.

The order matters more than the result: the markup by hand first, and only then Trade Model. Otherwise it would be a hint and not a check.

▶️ Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yusw3NiO4Oo
📄 Practice on the site: https://focusprofit.pro/practice/

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

Why someone else's profit screenshot says nothing about your work

You closed the week slightly up and you were fine with it. Then you opened a chat and there it was: plus forty percent in three days. And your own result stopped being a result.

It isn't envy. A profit screenshot is a report without its second half: you see the outcome and you do not see the risk it was bought with. Forty percent in three days can be excellent work — or one surviving bet out of five.

Discipline cannot help here: the error is not in the behaviour but in the input.

▶️ Watch the breakdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbol9U9qEz4
📄 Trading psychology on the site: https://focusprofit.pro/learn/

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

Structure break in plain words

Price went under a low — and that alone means nothing. Sometimes it means everything. The difference is WHICH low it went under.

The anchor low is not just any bottom. It is the bottom of the move after which the market took the liquidity and carried on. While price holds above it, the buyer leads.

A break is a close below such a low. Not a touch, not a wick: a close.

▶️ Watch the lesson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfpQf63yCT0
📄 The whole course: https://focusprofit.pro/learn/

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

₿ BTC — swept the monthly fractal and got a reaction
live idea · the analysis comes before the move

❗ Where price is
In the discount of the monthly trading range, inside a strong order flow zone with an order block in it.

🔍 What confirms it
A confirmed reaction, the monthly most traded volume zone, the weekly one repeating it. Point A comes from the monthly fractal being swept.

⚠️ What is MISSING
No structure breaks on fifteen minutes or the hour. The nearest break sits above. The idea leans on the strength of the zone, not on lower-timeframe structure — and that is said in the analysis itself.

🎯 Invalidation
Below point A the idea is closed.

🎬 Watch the analysis (3:04)

· The same analysis in text
· Free indicator
· Full version of the indicator
📄 The analysis on the site

🇩🇪 GER40 — broke the ATH and came back to the imbalance
live idea · the analysis comes before the move

❗ What happened
In July the break of the all-time high left a monthly imbalance. In September price came back to it — and the test comes from premium, not from discount.

🧭 Where to look for an entry
The working range is lower, on the four-hour. There price is already in the discount zone.

🔍 Confirmations
A sweep of the daily fractal with the body closing above it, a reaction in a strong order flow zone, and a reversal of the hourly structure. Three of them — and only after that the plan is built.

⚠️ Invalidation
Below point A the idea is cancelled. The outcome is not in the video — it is still ahead.

🎬 Watch the analysis (6:08)

· The same analysis in text
· Free indicator
· Full version of the indicator
📄 The analysis on the site

📉 $NFLX — no confirmation, so we go lower
weekly chart · a random bar from 2021

❗ What happened
The condition was named in advance: hold above the level and a most traded volume zone forms. Price did not hold. So it goes down, to sweep both liquidities. And that is what happened.

🧭 The order of the analysis
Trend from two ranges → liquidity in discount → the monthly imbalance and the reaction from it → three questions → point A and point B.

🔍 The check
All the markup by hand first, and only then Trade Model. Otherwise it is a hint, not a check.

🎯 The outcome
The zone was tested, the reaction came, the target was reached.

🎬 Watch the analysis (8:39)

· Free indicator
· Full version of the indicator
📄 The walkthrough on the site

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

$MCD — the condition was named, and price met it
weekly chart · a random bar from 1994

❗ What happened
The invalidation was named before the outcome was visible: the idea is alive while price holds above the monthly most traded volume zone. Price never went back below, and it walked the whole way.

🧭 The order of the analysis
Trend from two ranges → liquidity in discount → the monthly fractal and the reaction from it → three questions → point A and point B.

🔍 The check
All the markup by hand first, and only then Trade Model. Otherwise it is a hint, not a check. The indicator confirmed the direction and lit the fractal orange — that is how it marks liquidity that has been taken.

🎯 The outcome
Point A 12.78, point B 15.69. The high reached 16.99, so the target was passed with a dollar thirty to spare.

🎬 Watch the analysis (7:31)

· Free indicator
· Full version of the indicator
📄 Practice on the site

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

USDPLN — plan cancelled by the rule, the second one hit the target
weekly chart · a random bar from 2018

❗ What happened
The indicator put the first plan in doubt: the trading range is wider, and on the monthly it is broken. There is no live range, and a decision outside a range breaks the rules. The plan was cancelled — even though price later reached its target.

🧭 The second plan
A new valid range → price in discount at a monthly fractal → confirmation by a weekly imbalance → three questions → point A and point B.

🎯 The outcome
Point A 3.6159, point B 4.30775. The high reached about 4.62 — the target was hit.

🎬 Watch the analysis (8:18)

· Free indicator
· Full version of the indicator
📄 Practice on the site

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

Where to start

The guide “How to read market structure” — five steps with short lessons — and the free Market Structure indicator for TradingView. You can also request a 14-day Trade Model DEMO there.

All in our bot 👉 @focusprofit_bot

Informational content — not individual investment advice. Trading involves the risk of losing capital.

GBPCHF — a monthly imbalance, target at the range low
daily chart · a random bar from 2019

🧭 The plan
Downtrend → price in the premium of the daily trading range → a monthly imbalance gives a weekly most traded volume zone → three questions → point A and point B.

🎯 The outcome
Point A 1.33113, point B 1.16579. In March 2020 price went below point B — the target was hit.

🎬 Watch the analysis (8:17)

🤖 The free indicator, the guide and a Trade Model DEMO — in our bot
📄 Practice on the site

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

Order blocks in Trade Model: which candle price turns from
how-to · 1 minute

Price can turn from the whole flow zone — or from a single candle inside it. Trade Model marks that candle as the order block: the first candle after the liquidity sweep from which price left with an imbalance.

🟣 Untested blocks are what matters. The reaction from such a block is an IFC, and the indicator puts Point A there.
⚪ Every block in the flow is tested, or there are none — the flow is weak.
⚙️ Turned on in the settings: Show order blocks and Show IFC blocks.

🎬 Watch the how-to (1:06)
🤖 The free indicator, the guide and the Trade Model DEMO — in our bot

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

$MSFT — a monthly imbalance, target at the range high
weekly chart · a random bar from 2011

🧭 The plan
No two trading ranges yet — wait for the second → skip liquidity outside the discount → a monthly imbalance gives a weekly zone → three questions → point A and point B.

🎯 The outcome
Point A 26.26, point B 32.95. Without any correction price went in an impulse to the established high — the target was hit.

🎬 Watch the analysis (7:37)

🤖 The free indicator, the guide and a Trade Model DEMO — in our bot
📄 Practice on the site

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.

Zone strength in Trade Model: why one zone holds price and another breaks
how-to · under a minute

One flow zone holds price, another gets pierced right through. Trade Model gives each zone strength stars — from zero to two.

⭐ The first star — price left the zone in a sharp impulse, not a slow drift.
⭐ The second — the zone coincides with a higher-timeframe imbalance.
💡 Hover over the zone label — the tooltip shows why it got the stars.
⚙️ Turned on in the settings: Show zone strength and Show strength tooltip.

🎬 Watch the how-to (0:45)
🤖 Free indicator and DEMO — in the bot

⚠️ Educational content. Not individual investment advice.