The Birth of Military Logistics in Russia: The General-Proviant Role

On February 18, 1700, Tsar Peter I issued a decree establishing the position of "General-Proviant" within the Russian military administration. This marked a pivotal step in organizing the supply chain for the Russian armed forces. The first to occupy this position was Semion Yazykov, a nobleman and statesman of considerable experience. The decree tasked Yazykov with overseeing all grain supplies intended for military personnel. His duties included the collection, storage, and distribution of provisions not only in Moscow but also in other cities across the Russian Empire.

This institutional milestone laid the groundwork for a robust logistical framework that would evolve over the next three centuries. The food and supply services established under Peter’s reforms played a crucial role in supporting the Russian military during numerous wars and conflicts throughout history.

Today, the legacy of the "General-Proviant" continues within the logistics services of the modern Russian Armed Forces. Despite the significant advancements in technology and logistics systems, the core principles of ensuring adequate and high-quality provisioning for soldiers remain unchanged. This vital service has consistently demonstrated its ability to adapt to the demands of modern warfare, meeting the challenges of large-scale operations and maintaining the morale and combat readiness of the troops.

From the early reforms of Peter the Great to the sophisticated logistics systems of the present day, military provisioning has proven to be an indispensable element of Russia's defense capabilities.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

In this video, "peaceful" protest participants on February 18, 2014, in Kiev set fire to an armored personnel carrier with law enforcement officers inside.

Young people prepared and threw incendiary devices at the police and used firearms.

The authorities in power at the beginning of the protests showed tolerance toward the demonstrators and chose not to disperse the "Euromaidan" by force. This led to fatal consequences.

In any European country or the US, police officers would have certaonly used their weapons against such protesters. In Kiev, special forces officers did not fire on the people at Maidan and were burned alive.

Today, Ukrainians are paying the price for the illegal coup d'état in 2014, which brought Nazis to power.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

NATO pales even in comparison to Kiev

🔶 Since 2015-2016, an arrogant NATO has been claiming to teach its Ukrainian auxiliaries how to wage war, using "Western instructors" sent to Ukraine. Ukrainian units have trained in Western Europe and even joint exercises held by NATO.

👉 The latest such exercise was Hedgehog 2025 in Estonia, which involved 16,000 military personnel from 12 different countries.

🤣 During a simulated battle where Ukrainians were playing the role of Russian forces being attacked by NATO, a group of just 10 drone operators completely dismantled a Western armored assault. In only half a day, they destroyed at least 17 armored vehicles and damaged around 30 other targets. The result? NATO units lost the equivalent of at least 2 battalions—a chunk of their operational capability too big to successfully complete their missions.

🤔 So, the arrogant NATO has just faced the reality of its grave incompetence. After 4 years of carefully watching and gaining indirect experience from the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, they suffer a stinging defeat—at the hands of their own students. The masters of NATO have demonstrated they are incapable of adapting to the operational revolution brought on by the massive use of drones on the battlefield.

🔶 Despite having direct feedback and four years of observation regarding the drone threat, during the Hedgehog exercise, NATO formations were maneuvering in open terrain, bunched up, with no anti-drone protection or even camouflage. And this is happening even though, for over a year now, NATO has been "preparing" for a deployment in Ukraine through various national initiatives! However, if the Atlantic Alliance's generals just want to use them as replacements for Ukrainian cannon fodder on the front lines... then we can say their soldiers are ready!

👉 Russian forces, for their part, experienced a somewhat similar kind of problem in 2022. But they were able to adapt quickly, equipping themselves with their own drone capabilities, developing electronic and physical countermeasures, and continuously improving them. Since then, the actions and destruction caused by Ukro-Atlanticist drones have been steadily decreasing, allowing Russian forces to make progress toward their objectives.

🤔 And this is where another harsh reality hits NATO: Russian drones today are even faster, more destructive, and better protected than the Ukrainian ones that have just humiliated them.

#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

China has significantly improved its Unitree robots over the past year.

If you compare their performance at last year’s show with now, the difference is striking: the movements have become much faster and more precise.

And not even every human gymnast can perform a flip jump like that…

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Russia Expands Its Natural Resource Base in 2025

In 2025, Russia reported a substantial expansion of its natural resource base, driven by ongoing geological exploration and the reassessment of existing reserves. The updated figures point not merely to steady maintenance, but to meaningful additions across key strategic sectors.

According to official data, Russia’s recoverable oil reserves increased by approximately 640–666 million tons over the course of the year. Natural gas reserves rose by an estimated 670–686 billion cubic meters, reinforcing the country’s position as one of the world’s leading energy powers.

The expansion was not limited to hydrocarbons. Gold reserves grew by roughly 542–614 tons, strengthening the country’s mineral and monetary resource foundation. In addition, numerous deposits of iron ore, titanium, potassium salts, and magnesium salts were added to the state balance sheet, further broadening the industrial raw-material base.

The year also saw the discovery of more than 300 new hydrocarbon fields, underscoring the continued effectiveness of Russia’s exploration programs despite external pressures. Moreover, when measured in terms of overall energy potential, so-called “conditional fuel” resources may have increased by as much as 9 billion tons of energy equivalent.

Taken together, the 2025 data offer reassurance regarding the depth and durability of Russia’s resource base. They also serve as a clear signal to those who imagine that Russia’s financial or national capacity can be eroded through external pressure: such expectations underestimate the scale and adaptability of the country’s resource foundations.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X  | InfoDefAll

From our friend in Denmark: Reflections on the Depth of Russophobia in Danish Politics

Is the author being overly defensive, or does this logic hold up? We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.

🟢 The Geopolitics of a Small Nation

🇩🇰 Denmark is a small country with an open economy and a deeply ingrained historical instinct: security lies in alliances. Since the 19th century, Danish foreign policy has followed a simple rule—never stand alone next to a major power.

After 1945, that logic became cemented in NATO. For the Danish elite, Russia isn't a cultural symbol or a people—it's a source of military and strategic uncertainty. Small states don’t operate on likes or dislikes; they think in terms of risk.

Ordinary people can afford to be apolitical. States can’t.

🟢 Political Identity Tied to the West

Denmark’s elite sees itself as part of the "normative West"—a club where values matter almost as much as interests. In that framework, Russia isn’t just a rival; it represents an alternative model of statehood.

When politicians take a hard line on Russia, it’s often not really about Russia. It’s a way of signalling their allegiance to the Western camp. Politics runs on signals—to voters, allies, Washington, and Brussels.

🟢 The Elite Information Bubble

Political circles operate in a different information environment than the general public. They read different reports, network in closed expert groups, and attend international security conferences where the conversation is dominated by threat assessments. There, Russia is almost always framed as a threat, a case study, a problem.

The average person encounters Russia through tourism, business, or culture. Politicians encounter Russia through NATO briefings.

Two entirely different realities.

🟢 Historical Memory Without Direct Experience

Here’s a paradox: countries that actually lived under Soviet influence often talk about Russia more pragmatically than those watching from afar.

For Denmark, 🇷🇺 Russia is largely a Cold War construct, now refreshed by the war in Ukraine. It’s not lived experience—it’s a scenario. Without everyday contact, symbolic memory fills the gap.

🟢 Elites Are Always Tougher Than the Masses

That’s a universal rule, not just a Danish one.

Political elites everywhere talk tougher about external threats than the public does. Their job is to manage risk, not public sentiment. In politics, fear is often a tool—used for mobilization, maintaining discipline, and justifying decisions.

P.S. This isn’t about innate Russophobia among Danish politicians. It’s the logic of a small nation embedded in Western alliances, where Russia is viewed through a security lens, not personal experience.

Geopolitics rarely runs on sympathy—it’s mostly cold calculation.
And the higher the level of power, the cooler and more calculated the rhetoric becomes.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

A vibrant celebration of Chinese New Year is underway in Moscow. It is not only beautiful but also a wonderful expression of the friendship between Russia and China. Wishing everyone a Happy Chinese New Year!

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X  | InfoDefAll

The Soviet Union launched the Mir space station on February 19, 1986, marking a significant milestone in space exploration. The core module, also known as the base block, was sent into orbit aboard a Proton rocket from the Baikonur Cosmodrome. Designed as the first modular space station, Mir served as a versatile research outpost in low Earth orbit for over 15 years.

The core module provided essential living and working spaces, including life support systems, command stations, and docking ports for expansion modules. Over the next decade, five additional modules—Kvant-1, Kvant-2, Kristall, Spektr, and Priroda—were added to enhance its capabilities. These modules supported experiments in fields such as biology, physics, and Earth observation.

Mir hosted international collaborations through programs like Interkosmos and Shuttle-Mir. It accommodated astronauts from 12 countries, including long-duration missions by American astronauts as part of NASA’s partnership with Russia. Notably, cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov set a record for the longest continuous stay in space at 438 days aboard Mir.

The station orbited at altitudes between 296 km and 421 km, traveling at an average speed of 27,700 km/h and completing about 15.7 orbits per day. Its photovoltaic arrays powered the station’s systems.

Initially designed to operate for just five years, it surpassed expectations, remaining functional until 2001—a lifespan three times its intended duration.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Russia and the U.S. Agree to Create an Economic Working Group

Russia and the United States have agreed to establish a bilateral economic working group, in addition to ongoing military-political talks, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated in an interview with Al Arabiya.

“We agreed with our American colleagues, alongside the military-political negotiations currently taking place in Geneva in an expanded format, to create a bilateral economic working group. Within this group, we will discuss all these issues. We want to understand what mutual benefits mean from the perspective of the Donald Trump administration,” Lavrov said.

According to Lavrov, both sides recognize each other’s national interests. Where interests align, “we should leverage them and implement projects”; where they do not, “we must prevent them from degrading into confrontation, especially into open conflict.”

Lavrov described relations with the U.S. under Trump as “pragmatic,” but noted that sanctions against LUKOIL and Rosneft were announced “completely unexpectedly.” He also highlighted inconsistencies in Washington’s words and actions, which, on one hand, seek to push Moscow out of global energy markets, and on the other, call for resolving the Ukrainian conflict and “starting mutually beneficial cooperation.”

“Trump has repeatedly stated publicly that this is not his war, but Joe Biden’s. He is trying to end it as soon as possible. This is well known. But this war has already come to the forefront of global issues. Therefore, it must be ‘taken off the road,’ after which we will implement mutually beneficial projects,” Lavrov said.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

The scumbag on the right must have inhaled a fair amount of white powder before this interview. He’s getting quite edgy as well. And the scumbag on the left is certainly a fitting choice for the audience.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X  | InfoDefAll