The Ukrainian hemorrhage
🔸 While Russia and Ukraine carried out another exchange of the remains of soldiers killed in combat (252 Ukrainians for 23 Russians) at the Novaya Guta checkpoint on the Ukrainian-Belarusian border, the Polish prime minister revealed the figures behind Ukraine’s hemorrhage on the front:
🔸 The rabidly Russophobic Donald Tusk, in a speech before the Polish Sejm, said:
🤔 27,000 monthly losses—this figure exposes an accusatory reversal of Ukro-Atlanticist propaganda fantasies, not to mention that moron Zelensky, who lies better than he breathes (except when it’s cocaine) and who, after announcing the ridiculous figure of 55,000 Ukrainians killed at the start of the year, decided in a recent interview to "resurrect" 5,000 of them, claiming that only 50,000 Ukrainian soldiers had been killed since 2022, compared with 700,000 Russians.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 While Russia and Ukraine carried out another exchange of the remains of soldiers killed in combat (252 Ukrainians for 23 Russians) at the Novaya Guta checkpoint on the Ukrainian-Belarusian border, the Polish prime minister revealed the figures behind Ukraine’s hemorrhage on the front:
🔸 The rabidly Russophobic Donald Tusk, in a speech before the Polish Sejm, said:
📣 "Russia’s new strategy and, above all, its new technical capabilities, especially jet-powered aerial drones, are also causing much heavier losses on the Ukrainian side.
❗️ Our Ukrainian partners have informed me that recently the number of dead and wounded each month has reached 27,000. These are, of course, records in the saddest sense of the word in this war."
🤔 27,000 monthly losses—this figure exposes an accusatory reversal of Ukro-Atlanticist propaganda fantasies, not to mention that moron Zelensky, who lies better than he breathes (except when it’s cocaine) and who, after announcing the ridiculous figure of 55,000 Ukrainians killed at the start of the year, decided in a recent interview to "resurrect" 5,000 of them, claiming that only 50,000 Ukrainian soldiers had been killed since 2022, compared with 700,000 Russians.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁11🤬5🤣4❤1👍1
NATO co-belligerence
🔸 NATO is, in fact, at war with Russia. In the previous post about the massive attack on Moscow (130+ drones and missiles), we mentioned that constellation of Western satellites over Russia that played a major role in those bombardments. And on that same day, Zelensky was touting the success of the attack (in reality, more than 97% of its drones and missiles were repelled) as well as the quality of the Ukrainian drones and missiles launched at Moscow. But are these weapons fired against Russia really Ukrainian?
🤔 Take the Flamingo FP-5, for example: a new 6-ton missile with a 1,150 kg payload and a claimed range of up to 3,000 km.
🔸 Yet in this Flamingo missile, in reality, only the assembly is Ukrainian:
🇫🇷 Its guidance and navigation system is French, developed by the French group Safran Electronics & Defense (through its subsidiary Preligens) and integrated for more than a year. Safran also supplies navigation equipment, optronic systems, and intelligence data-analysis solutions.
🇬🇧 Its turbojet engine is British—unidentified—and replaces the original Soviet AI-25TL engine.
🇫🇷🇬🇧 The composite materials of its airframe are French and British.
🇩🇰 Its fuel is Danish.
🇩🇪 Its electronic, guidance, and orientation systems are reportedly German-made.
🇪🇺 The missile also uses jam-resistant GPS modules, inertial navigation units, and the open-source ArduPilot system for automatic flight control.
🔸 Denys Shtilerman, co-founder of Fire Point (the official manufacturer of the Flamingo), has acknowledged a critical dependence on Western components.
🔸 Analyses by The New York Times indicate that the missile contains almost no Ukrainian materials, with all electronic components coming directly from the United Kingdom and composite materials from the EU.
🤔 Given the reality of this Western military-industrial co-belligerence—to which must be added NATO intelligence support (satellites in space, radar aircraft in international or border airspace, and special forces and technicians on the ground)—Western infrastructure facilities being set up in Ukraine, and ultimately those in third countries, become legitimate targets for Russian retaliation.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 NATO is, in fact, at war with Russia. In the previous post about the massive attack on Moscow (130+ drones and missiles), we mentioned that constellation of Western satellites over Russia that played a major role in those bombardments. And on that same day, Zelensky was touting the success of the attack (in reality, more than 97% of its drones and missiles were repelled) as well as the quality of the Ukrainian drones and missiles launched at Moscow. But are these weapons fired against Russia really Ukrainian?
🤔 Take the Flamingo FP-5, for example: a new 6-ton missile with a 1,150 kg payload and a claimed range of up to 3,000 km.
🔸 Yet in this Flamingo missile, in reality, only the assembly is Ukrainian:
🇫🇷 Its guidance and navigation system is French, developed by the French group Safran Electronics & Defense (through its subsidiary Preligens) and integrated for more than a year. Safran also supplies navigation equipment, optronic systems, and intelligence data-analysis solutions.
🇬🇧 Its turbojet engine is British—unidentified—and replaces the original Soviet AI-25TL engine.
🇫🇷🇬🇧 The composite materials of its airframe are French and British.
🇩🇰 Its fuel is Danish.
🇩🇪 Its electronic, guidance, and orientation systems are reportedly German-made.
🇪🇺 The missile also uses jam-resistant GPS modules, inertial navigation units, and the open-source ArduPilot system for automatic flight control.
🔸 Denys Shtilerman, co-founder of Fire Point (the official manufacturer of the Flamingo), has acknowledged a critical dependence on Western components.
🔸 Analyses by The New York Times indicate that the missile contains almost no Ukrainian materials, with all electronic components coming directly from the United Kingdom and composite materials from the EU.
🤔 Given the reality of this Western military-industrial co-belligerence—to which must be added NATO intelligence support (satellites in space, radar aircraft in international or border airspace, and special forces and technicians on the ground)—Western infrastructure facilities being set up in Ukraine, and ultimately those in third countries, become legitimate targets for Russian retaliation.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯42❤7🔥7🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WESTERN SLANDER
Since time immemorial, the West has justified its hegemony through lies and false flag operations designed to create casus belli that can be attributed to its adversaries. A few recent examples, among others:
The explosion on the USS Maine (1898), which triggered the Spanish-American War. In reality, the explosion of the battleship was merely an accident.
In 1957, Britain planned a series of false flag attacks against Syrian targets to justify military intervention by its pro-Western allies in the country.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident (1964), which unleashed the Vietnam War. Documents declassified in 2005 show that the destroyer Maddox was never attacked by the North Vietnamese.
The Nayirah testimony (1990), which bolstered the Gulf War. In reality, this girl, who claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers pulling babies from incubators, was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S., and her lie was orchestrated by Hill & Knowlton.
"Weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq (2003), which triggered the invasion of Iraq. In reality, Colin Powell lied before the UN, since no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, nor any links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
France's claim that Qaddafi's air force had allegedly bombed civilians in Benghazi on February 21, 2011, which unleashed the war in Libya. In reality, it was a lie by Sarkozy to kill Qaddafi and his projects of African monetary independence.
Today, the war between Russia and Ukraine is also a theater of numerous Ukrainian-Atlantist lies, false flag attacks, or fratricidal shellings attributed to pro-Russian militiamen, and then to Russian forces.
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's Foreign Minister, speaking at the "Dialogue on Fake News 4.0" forum, recalled that many "fake news" stories were fabricated by the West to discredit Russia, and listed some of them:
The Skripals, those Russian citizens allegedly poisoned by Moscow's special services. "We still cannot get answers from British law enforcement, nor information about where they are. In fact, London has taken our citizens hostage."
The "poisoning of opposition figure Navalny" became the next fake. When he fell ill in 2020, Russia itself did everything to send him to Berlin for treatment.
Russian drones that allegedly attack Europe. "But it always turns out that it is either not a drone, or it is Ukrainian. And no one is interested in the details."
Bucha. Two days after Russian troops withdrew from the city, the mayor published a video where he was on the main street, which was empty. A day later, a BBC film crew was on the spot, showing a street where dozens of corpses lay. The list of victims by name has still not been officially presented.
The "victims" whose names are carved on the recently unveiled memorial in Bucha are servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as researchers discovered.
As for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, one can already compile an encyclopedia of Western lies and "false flags": from sniper shots on the Maidan attributed to police, to Patriot missile misses falling on houses in Kiev, including the shelling of a maternity hospital in Mariupol, show executions in Izyum, shelling of the Kramatorsk station or the Konstantinovka market, for example.
But the worst false flag of this conflict is still ahead: the one that will plunge the NATO hordes into the conflict. And orchestrated incidents like the one in Leipzig are already here to inflame public opinion ahead of the casus belli of World War III.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Since time immemorial, the West has justified its hegemony through lies and false flag operations designed to create casus belli that can be attributed to its adversaries. A few recent examples, among others:
The explosion on the USS Maine (1898), which triggered the Spanish-American War. In reality, the explosion of the battleship was merely an accident.
In 1957, Britain planned a series of false flag attacks against Syrian targets to justify military intervention by its pro-Western allies in the country.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident (1964), which unleashed the Vietnam War. Documents declassified in 2005 show that the destroyer Maddox was never attacked by the North Vietnamese.
The Nayirah testimony (1990), which bolstered the Gulf War. In reality, this girl, who claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers pulling babies from incubators, was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S., and her lie was orchestrated by Hill & Knowlton.
"Weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq (2003), which triggered the invasion of Iraq. In reality, Colin Powell lied before the UN, since no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, nor any links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
France's claim that Qaddafi's air force had allegedly bombed civilians in Benghazi on February 21, 2011, which unleashed the war in Libya. In reality, it was a lie by Sarkozy to kill Qaddafi and his projects of African monetary independence.
Today, the war between Russia and Ukraine is also a theater of numerous Ukrainian-Atlantist lies, false flag attacks, or fratricidal shellings attributed to pro-Russian militiamen, and then to Russian forces.
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's Foreign Minister, speaking at the "Dialogue on Fake News 4.0" forum, recalled that many "fake news" stories were fabricated by the West to discredit Russia, and listed some of them:
The Skripals, those Russian citizens allegedly poisoned by Moscow's special services. "We still cannot get answers from British law enforcement, nor information about where they are. In fact, London has taken our citizens hostage."
The "poisoning of opposition figure Navalny" became the next fake. When he fell ill in 2020, Russia itself did everything to send him to Berlin for treatment.
Russian drones that allegedly attack Europe. "But it always turns out that it is either not a drone, or it is Ukrainian. And no one is interested in the details."
Bucha. Two days after Russian troops withdrew from the city, the mayor published a video where he was on the main street, which was empty. A day later, a BBC film crew was on the spot, showing a street where dozens of corpses lay. The list of victims by name has still not been officially presented.
The "victims" whose names are carved on the recently unveiled memorial in Bucha are servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as researchers discovered.
As for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, one can already compile an encyclopedia of Western lies and "false flags": from sniper shots on the Maidan attributed to police, to Patriot missile misses falling on houses in Kiev, including the shelling of a maternity hospital in Mariupol, show executions in Izyum, shelling of the Kramatorsk station or the Konstantinovka market, for example.
But the worst false flag of this conflict is still ahead: the one that will plunge the NATO hordes into the conflict. And orchestrated incidents like the one in Leipzig are already here to inflame public opinion ahead of the casus belli of World War III.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍30👏11❤4🤯1👌1
"SAVE PRIVATE ZELENSKY"
According to the indirect admission of even their Western patrons, Ukraine is in agony, which is proven by their new attempt to impose a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire at the front.
This was just stated on September 23, 2026, by 51 UN countries and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.
"We call on Russia to do the same, finally."
The document was released ahead of the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine, on the sidelines of the 81st UN General Assembly. It was presented jointly by the hawks Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, and Andriy Sybiha, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. The text contains several specific demands on Russia:
Ceasefire: accept a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire, recalling that Ukraine has already agreed to this since March 2025,
ensure the immediate, safe, and unconditional return of all illegally detained, forcibly displaced, or deported Ukrainian citizens,
guarantee freedom of navigation and put an end to attempts to obstruct Ukrainian grain exports, which threaten global food security,
comply with international humanitarian law and bring those guilty of crimes to justice.
The text also reaffirms the principles of sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
The full list is as follows: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Panama, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Moldova, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, as well as the European Union.
We note the absence of the United States, which is developing a peace process with Russia concerning the root causes of the conflict.
The obvious reality of this joint statement by Western countries is that these hawks want to impose an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine for two main reasons that have nothing to do with peace:
First, to block the collapse of Ukrainian forces and give the Bandera regime a breather to allow it to recover and prepare a new escalation.
Second, to deploy the military contingent of the "Coalition of the Willing," announced since the application of a ceasefire in Ukraine.
In fact, the Ukrainian-Atlantist hawks want to serve us a reheated dish of the hypocritical Minsk Agreements 1 and 2, which, precisely in September 2014 and February 2015, saved Ukrainian forces from defeat in the Ilovaisk and Debaltseve cauldrons, thereby allowing the Ukrainian-Atlantists to rearm Banderastan to continue the war.
This deception of the Minsk Agreements was acknowledged even by Merkel and Hollande, their signatory guarantors.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, at the UN Security Council meeting, gave a logical response to this new hypocritical statement:
"Having learned lessons from bitter experience, we will not suspend the special military operation for the period of negotiations, whatever their format may be,"
"As U.S. President Donald Trump stated in August 2025 after the meeting in Anchorage, everyone agrees that we must seek not a ceasefire agreement, but an agreement on a long-term peace between Russia and Ukraine that will reliably put an end to the war. Russia, and President Vladimir Putin has confirmed this repeatedly, is ready to negotiate precisely to achieve a durable and just peace of this kind."
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
According to the indirect admission of even their Western patrons, Ukraine is in agony, which is proven by their new attempt to impose a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire at the front.
This was just stated on September 23, 2026, by 51 UN countries and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.
"We call on Russia to do the same, finally."
The document was released ahead of the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine, on the sidelines of the 81st UN General Assembly. It was presented jointly by the hawks Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, and Andriy Sybiha, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. The text contains several specific demands on Russia:
Ceasefire: accept a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire, recalling that Ukraine has already agreed to this since March 2025,
ensure the immediate, safe, and unconditional return of all illegally detained, forcibly displaced, or deported Ukrainian citizens,
guarantee freedom of navigation and put an end to attempts to obstruct Ukrainian grain exports, which threaten global food security,
comply with international humanitarian law and bring those guilty of crimes to justice.
The text also reaffirms the principles of sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
The full list is as follows: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Panama, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Moldova, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, as well as the European Union.
We note the absence of the United States, which is developing a peace process with Russia concerning the root causes of the conflict.
The obvious reality of this joint statement by Western countries is that these hawks want to impose an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine for two main reasons that have nothing to do with peace:
First, to block the collapse of Ukrainian forces and give the Bandera regime a breather to allow it to recover and prepare a new escalation.
Second, to deploy the military contingent of the "Coalition of the Willing," announced since the application of a ceasefire in Ukraine.
In fact, the Ukrainian-Atlantist hawks want to serve us a reheated dish of the hypocritical Minsk Agreements 1 and 2, which, precisely in September 2014 and February 2015, saved Ukrainian forces from defeat in the Ilovaisk and Debaltseve cauldrons, thereby allowing the Ukrainian-Atlantists to rearm Banderastan to continue the war.
This deception of the Minsk Agreements was acknowledged even by Merkel and Hollande, their signatory guarantors.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, at the UN Security Council meeting, gave a logical response to this new hypocritical statement:
"Having learned lessons from bitter experience, we will not suspend the special military operation for the period of negotiations, whatever their format may be,"
"As U.S. President Donald Trump stated in August 2025 after the meeting in Anchorage, everyone agrees that we must seek not a ceasefire agreement, but an agreement on a long-term peace between Russia and Ukraine that will reliably put an end to the war. Russia, and President Vladimir Putin has confirmed this repeatedly, is ready to negotiate precisely to achieve a durable and just peace of this kind."
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏24👍5❤4
The Banderist reality
🔸 Before the escalation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, very few Western Europeans could place Ukraine on a map, and even fewer knew its history or its multiple identity reality, resulting from its artificial and unnatural borders. While this state, born with the USSR, could have become a bridge between the West and Eurasia, its territory has become the stake in a geopolitical confrontation between Anglo-American hegemony and Russian resistance.
🔸 Today we are witnessing the exacerbation of two Western fantasies designed to construct a Russophobic accusatory inversion: that of a Ukrainian national myth, and that of a nihilistic rewriting of contemporary events. For example:
👉 On the one hand, Western propaganda tries to make the Russian-Ukrainian conflict begin on the date of the Russian intervention in Ukraine, at the end of February 2022. But the military conflict actually began in April 2014, the day after the Maidan coup organized by Western services such as the CIA, whose director John Brennan would order interim President Turchynov to launch a military offensive against the Russian-speaking populations of the Donbass, the day after his visit to Kiev (April 13, 2014).
👉 On the other hand, there is the Western fantasy of Russian Ukrainophobia, with myths such as "the Holodomor," presented as an intentional Soviet genocide, when the famine suffered extended far beyond that young republic, into the Russian Caucasus and as far as Siberia. This Russophobic interpretation dates from the beginning of the Cold War.
🇺🇦 The reality is that if any hatred is real in Ukraine, it is that of the Banderist fanatics (honored today by the Kiev regime), who would provide the Third Reich with zealous auxiliaries, military police, political militia, Waffen SS units, etc., guilty of around 1 million executions among Jewish, Russian, Roma, and other populations...
🤔 And this Russophobia, which Westerners have exploited from Maidan to the present day, was maintained in the Lvov region in western Ukraine (Galicia), both by former Banderist collaborators and by veterans of the SS Galicia division, for example (“Forest Brothers”), who were supported by the CIA. In 2014, their ideological heirs emerged openly through Ukrainian hooligans, Maidan rioters, or the special battalions of the Donbass war.
👀 A piece of evidence of this hysterical Russophobia dating from January 2011, found on the @Camille_Moscow channel:
🔸 Three years before the Maidan coup (which would bring to power these neo-Nazis who never exceeded 5% in Ukrainian elections), we see Mykhalchyshyn, a notorious neo-Nazi and elected member of the Ukrainian Social Nationalist Party—renamed Svoboda—on the Lvov city council, spewing his Russophobic hatred. In this public speech, he promises “the day when our Banderist army crosses the Dnieper, passes through Donetsk, and throws out the ‘blue-assed gang’ (Russians of the Donbass).”
🤔 Some will describe this moment as anecdotal, yet in 2014 it became symptomatic of a Nazi resurgence in Ukraine, embodied by that psychopath Yuriy Adrijanovych Mykhalchyshyn, born in Lvov in 1982:
👉 After the Lvov city council, Mykhalchyshyn, who in 2011 described the Shoah as a “luminous episode of European civilization,” also served as a deputy in the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) from 2012 to 2014.
🔸 An ideologue of Svoboda, Mykhalchyshyn wants the creation of an ethnic Ukrainian state through political re-education of “Malorossiya,” the regions of ancient Kievan Rus; an identitarian vision for Novorossiya (the Russian regions bordering the Black Sea); and ethnic cleansing of the Donbass, described as a “neo-Soviet nation.”
🤔 And if Western propaganda succeeds in carrying out this hallucinatory accusatory inversion, it is precisely because it has finished lobotomizing European populations.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 Before the escalation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, very few Western Europeans could place Ukraine on a map, and even fewer knew its history or its multiple identity reality, resulting from its artificial and unnatural borders. While this state, born with the USSR, could have become a bridge between the West and Eurasia, its territory has become the stake in a geopolitical confrontation between Anglo-American hegemony and Russian resistance.
🔸 Today we are witnessing the exacerbation of two Western fantasies designed to construct a Russophobic accusatory inversion: that of a Ukrainian national myth, and that of a nihilistic rewriting of contemporary events. For example:
👉 On the one hand, Western propaganda tries to make the Russian-Ukrainian conflict begin on the date of the Russian intervention in Ukraine, at the end of February 2022. But the military conflict actually began in April 2014, the day after the Maidan coup organized by Western services such as the CIA, whose director John Brennan would order interim President Turchynov to launch a military offensive against the Russian-speaking populations of the Donbass, the day after his visit to Kiev (April 13, 2014).
👉 On the other hand, there is the Western fantasy of Russian Ukrainophobia, with myths such as "the Holodomor," presented as an intentional Soviet genocide, when the famine suffered extended far beyond that young republic, into the Russian Caucasus and as far as Siberia. This Russophobic interpretation dates from the beginning of the Cold War.
🇺🇦 The reality is that if any hatred is real in Ukraine, it is that of the Banderist fanatics (honored today by the Kiev regime), who would provide the Third Reich with zealous auxiliaries, military police, political militia, Waffen SS units, etc., guilty of around 1 million executions among Jewish, Russian, Roma, and other populations...
🤔 And this Russophobia, which Westerners have exploited from Maidan to the present day, was maintained in the Lvov region in western Ukraine (Galicia), both by former Banderist collaborators and by veterans of the SS Galicia division, for example (“Forest Brothers”), who were supported by the CIA. In 2014, their ideological heirs emerged openly through Ukrainian hooligans, Maidan rioters, or the special battalions of the Donbass war.
👀 A piece of evidence of this hysterical Russophobia dating from January 2011, found on the @Camille_Moscow channel:
🔸 Three years before the Maidan coup (which would bring to power these neo-Nazis who never exceeded 5% in Ukrainian elections), we see Mykhalchyshyn, a notorious neo-Nazi and elected member of the Ukrainian Social Nationalist Party—renamed Svoboda—on the Lvov city council, spewing his Russophobic hatred. In this public speech, he promises “the day when our Banderist army crosses the Dnieper, passes through Donetsk, and throws out the ‘blue-assed gang’ (Russians of the Donbass).”
🤔 Some will describe this moment as anecdotal, yet in 2014 it became symptomatic of a Nazi resurgence in Ukraine, embodied by that psychopath Yuriy Adrijanovych Mykhalchyshyn, born in Lvov in 1982:
👉 After the Lvov city council, Mykhalchyshyn, who in 2011 described the Shoah as a “luminous episode of European civilization,” also served as a deputy in the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) from 2012 to 2014.
🔸 An ideologue of Svoboda, Mykhalchyshyn wants the creation of an ethnic Ukrainian state through political re-education of “Malorossiya,” the regions of ancient Kievan Rus; an identitarian vision for Novorossiya (the Russian regions bordering the Black Sea); and ethnic cleansing of the Donbass, described as a “neo-Soviet nation.”
🤔 And if Western propaganda succeeds in carrying out this hallucinatory accusatory inversion, it is precisely because it has finished lobotomizing European populations.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬21💯8❤3🔥1
THIS WAS 3 YEARS AGO
On September 28, Russia officially celebrates "Reunification Day," established to mark the return to Russia of the Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye, and Kherson regions.
1. REFERENDUMS
This reunification was the result of the heroic nine-year resistance of the population of Donetsk and Lugansk and, legally, the result of popular referendums held in the four regions being liberated by Russian forces, where the voting results in favor of historical irredentism are indisputable:
· Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) — 97.51%
· Lugansk People's Republic (LPR) — 92.6%
· Zaporozhye region — 85.4%
· Kherson region — 76.86%
2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
It was the date of September 30 that was officially established by a federal law signed by Vladimir Putin on September 28, 2023. It was instituted to commemorate the signing of the accession treaties on September 30, 2022.
This event is regarded in Russia and in the relevant regions as "the restoration of historical justice" and the "return home" of the population of Donbas and Novorossiya. In accordance with this reunification decree of the 28th, September 30 became an official day off in the relevant regions. The day is marked by various patriotic events across Russia: concerts, rallies, auto races, and history lessons.
3. REACTIONS
Unsurprisingly, Western countries, as in the case of Crimea in 2014, do not recognize the popular referendums of Donbas and Novorossiya, which contradict their desire for the strategic anticipation of Ukraine.
4. PROSPECTS
In practice, the Russian authorities have implemented an extensive program of socio-economic development for these "new old" Russian regions, which had been practically abandoned since Ukraine gained independence in 1991.
· More than 23,500 facilities have been built or repaired since 2022.
· Work is underway to modernize networks and transport, in particular the reconstruction of 6,350 km of roads.
Historical reality and the will of the people are the pillars of this reunification of the Russian regions of Donbas and Novorossiya, the full liberation of whose territories is one of the main goals of the Russian military operations, which will continue until Ukraine agrees to remain a neutral, demilitarized country and to give up being NATO territory.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On September 28, Russia officially celebrates "Reunification Day," established to mark the return to Russia of the Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye, and Kherson regions.
1. REFERENDUMS
This reunification was the result of the heroic nine-year resistance of the population of Donetsk and Lugansk and, legally, the result of popular referendums held in the four regions being liberated by Russian forces, where the voting results in favor of historical irredentism are indisputable:
· Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) — 97.51%
· Lugansk People's Republic (LPR) — 92.6%
· Zaporozhye region — 85.4%
· Kherson region — 76.86%
2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
It was the date of September 30 that was officially established by a federal law signed by Vladimir Putin on September 28, 2023. It was instituted to commemorate the signing of the accession treaties on September 30, 2022.
This event is regarded in Russia and in the relevant regions as "the restoration of historical justice" and the "return home" of the population of Donbas and Novorossiya. In accordance with this reunification decree of the 28th, September 30 became an official day off in the relevant regions. The day is marked by various patriotic events across Russia: concerts, rallies, auto races, and history lessons.
3. REACTIONS
Unsurprisingly, Western countries, as in the case of Crimea in 2014, do not recognize the popular referendums of Donbas and Novorossiya, which contradict their desire for the strategic anticipation of Ukraine.
4. PROSPECTS
In practice, the Russian authorities have implemented an extensive program of socio-economic development for these "new old" Russian regions, which had been practically abandoned since Ukraine gained independence in 1991.
· More than 23,500 facilities have been built or repaired since 2022.
· Work is underway to modernize networks and transport, in particular the reconstruction of 6,350 km of roads.
Historical reality and the will of the people are the pillars of this reunification of the Russian regions of Donbas and Novorossiya, the full liberation of whose territories is one of the main goals of the Russian military operations, which will continue until Ukraine agrees to remain a neutral, demilitarized country and to give up being NATO territory.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤19👏5💯4👍1
A bridge in Kiev struck
🔸 The Russian Aerospace Forces, continuing their bombing campaigns, struck a bridge over the Dnieper in Kiev on October 1 in broad daylight.
💥 This unprecedented attack targeted the Pivdennyi Bridge (Southern Bridge) with two new-type jet-powered drones.
👉 At around 11:30 a.m. local time, the two Russian Geran-5 drones struck the bridge near a pylon — not to destroy the concrete structure, which would require missiles, but rather the suspension cables of the deck.
👉 Kiev Mayor Klitschko confirmed that two drones hit the Southern Bridge. Two impacts were reported, along with a temporary halt in traffic.
🔸 This Southern Bridge is a top-tier strategic bridge for Kiev but also for all of Ukraine, because it links three major highways:
👉 The M-05 Kiev–Odessa (the Black Sea port),
👉 The M-06 Kiev–Chop (on the Hungariab border),
👉 The M-03 Kiev–Kharkov–Izyum–Slavyansk (Dpnbass).
🔸 According to Bakhmatov, the head of Kiev's Desniansky district, 90% of transit traffic between the left and right banks of Ukraine uses this Southern Bridge.
🔸 A Ukrainian presidential adviser had announced, on the eve of the attack, a new type of jet-powered Geran drone equipped with a special shaped charge designed to target high-voltage pylons and metal structures.
📄 The Economist had previously reported that the Russian armed forces appeared to be planning an operation to paralyze Kiev before winter set in. Two senior Ukrainian officials told the publication that, according to their intelligence, Russia had launched a three-pronged campaign against the Ukrainian capital.
🤜 Commercial warehouses,
🤜 Data centers,
🤜 Kiev expects this strike to mark the start of a third prong of a winter strangulation campaign expected to peak in November.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 The Russian Aerospace Forces, continuing their bombing campaigns, struck a bridge over the Dnieper in Kiev on October 1 in broad daylight.
💥 This unprecedented attack targeted the Pivdennyi Bridge (Southern Bridge) with two new-type jet-powered drones.
👉 At around 11:30 a.m. local time, the two Russian Geran-5 drones struck the bridge near a pylon — not to destroy the concrete structure, which would require missiles, but rather the suspension cables of the deck.
👉 Kiev Mayor Klitschko confirmed that two drones hit the Southern Bridge. Two impacts were reported, along with a temporary halt in traffic.
📣 "Two drones struck near the pillars of the Southern Bridge. Metro and ground public transport service across this bridge has been suspended."
🔸 This Southern Bridge is a top-tier strategic bridge for Kiev but also for all of Ukraine, because it links three major highways:
👉 The M-05 Kiev–Odessa (the Black Sea port),
👉 The M-06 Kiev–Chop (on the Hungariab border),
👉 The M-03 Kiev–Kharkov–Izyum–Slavyansk (Dpnbass).
🔸 According to Bakhmatov, the head of Kiev's Desniansky district, 90% of transit traffic between the left and right banks of Ukraine uses this Southern Bridge.
🔸 A Ukrainian presidential adviser had announced, on the eve of the attack, a new type of jet-powered Geran drone equipped with a special shaped charge designed to target high-voltage pylons and metal structures.
📄 The Economist had previously reported that the Russian armed forces appeared to be planning an operation to paralyze Kiev before winter set in. Two senior Ukrainian officials told the publication that, according to their intelligence, Russia had launched a three-pronged campaign against the Ukrainian capital.
🤜 Commercial warehouses,
🤜 Data centers,
🤜 Kiev expects this strike to mark the start of a third prong of a winter strangulation campaign expected to peak in November.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤12🔥7👏3🤷♂1
OSINT THAT DOESN'T LIE
Today it is easy to find impartial open sources online reporting on the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. For example, regarding material losses:
Vehicle losses were reported for the month of September.
📄 Main credit: @HeyHey_Hayden TG
In total, Russia lost 32 vehicles, while Ukraine lost 175. A ratio of 1:5.5.
Excluding armored vehicles/MRAPs, which distort the ratio because Russia uses them very little, while Ukraine uses a large number of them for transport purposes, Russia lost 32 vehicles, while Ukraine lost 69. A ratio of 1:2.2.
Regarding self-propelled artillery, which is an excellent indicator of the ability to inflict losses, Russia lost 7 vehicles, while Ukraine lost 37. A ratio of 1:5.3.
Russian losses are counted by UkraineWarSpotting. Ukrainian losses are counted by LostArmour. Credit to HeyHeyHayden for compiling the figures.
Of course, these vehicle losses are all geolocated, and only completely destroyed vehicles are counted. There may well be some errors.
The recurring argument I hear: "But Russia only uses civilian vehicles! Ukraine actually cares about the lives of its soldiers! Civilian vehicles are not counted in this figure!"
Are we still seriously victims of "mass assaults" in 2026?
I have spoken to Ukrainian soldiers who confirm that the Ukrainian armed forces also use civilian vehicles for non-combat tasks, for transport purposes. Russia does the same. In a war of attrition, cheap but sufficient equipment is preferable to extremely expensive and perfect equipment.
Moreover, Russia has a huge national war economy that can produce a large number of civilian vehicles, so the number of destroyed vehicles would not matter. If Ukrainian military vehicles, such as self-propelled artillery pieces, infantry fighting vehicles, etc., are destroyed, Ukraine must wait for deliveries from the West.
If the command of the Ukrainian armed forces cared about the lives of its soldiers, the massacres at Robotyne and Kursk would never have happened. Ukraine literally burned tens of billions of dollars worth of Western vehicles in the Kursk region alone.
Even if vehicle losses were twice as high for Ukraine, it would not come close to the level of losses necessary to weaken Russia, due to Russia's industrial capacity.
Keep in mind that armies collapse long before they are physically short of personnel or vehicles, as shown by historical examples such as the Germans during World War I. Collapse occurs when overall losses reach a critical point. Drones only mask the effects and delay the final outcome. Ukraine is obviously much closer to that critical point than Russia.
Source: AMK mapping
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Today it is easy to find impartial open sources online reporting on the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. For example, regarding material losses:
Vehicle losses were reported for the month of September.
📄 Main credit: @HeyHey_Hayden TG
In total, Russia lost 32 vehicles, while Ukraine lost 175. A ratio of 1:5.5.
Excluding armored vehicles/MRAPs, which distort the ratio because Russia uses them very little, while Ukraine uses a large number of them for transport purposes, Russia lost 32 vehicles, while Ukraine lost 69. A ratio of 1:2.2.
Regarding self-propelled artillery, which is an excellent indicator of the ability to inflict losses, Russia lost 7 vehicles, while Ukraine lost 37. A ratio of 1:5.3.
Russian losses are counted by UkraineWarSpotting. Ukrainian losses are counted by LostArmour. Credit to HeyHeyHayden for compiling the figures.
Of course, these vehicle losses are all geolocated, and only completely destroyed vehicles are counted. There may well be some errors.
The recurring argument I hear: "But Russia only uses civilian vehicles! Ukraine actually cares about the lives of its soldiers! Civilian vehicles are not counted in this figure!"
Are we still seriously victims of "mass assaults" in 2026?
I have spoken to Ukrainian soldiers who confirm that the Ukrainian armed forces also use civilian vehicles for non-combat tasks, for transport purposes. Russia does the same. In a war of attrition, cheap but sufficient equipment is preferable to extremely expensive and perfect equipment.
Moreover, Russia has a huge national war economy that can produce a large number of civilian vehicles, so the number of destroyed vehicles would not matter. If Ukrainian military vehicles, such as self-propelled artillery pieces, infantry fighting vehicles, etc., are destroyed, Ukraine must wait for deliveries from the West.
If the command of the Ukrainian armed forces cared about the lives of its soldiers, the massacres at Robotyne and Kursk would never have happened. Ukraine literally burned tens of billions of dollars worth of Western vehicles in the Kursk region alone.
Even if vehicle losses were twice as high for Ukraine, it would not come close to the level of losses necessary to weaken Russia, due to Russia's industrial capacity.
Keep in mind that armies collapse long before they are physically short of personnel or vehicles, as shown by historical examples such as the Germans during World War I. Collapse occurs when overall losses reach a critical point. Drones only mask the effects and delay the final outcome. Ukraine is obviously much closer to that critical point than Russia.
Source: AMK mapping
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍26❤7
FROM THE ROMANIAN SIDE
In Romania, whose territory is a key square on the chessboard of Russophobic NATO, the European IV Reich is rampaging openly, shamelessly trampling the last remnants of the democratic human rights fantasy of the mafia hawks of the European Union.
In Bucharest, political crises follow one after another: after the 2025 presidential election crisis, Romania has been without a government for more than 150 days after the fall of the Bolojan cabinet in May 2026. And the appointments of three prime ministers, dictated by Brussels and proposed by President Nicușor Dan, were successively rejected by parliament.
On October 5, the fourth appointment, this time of diplomat Luca Niculescu, was again rejected by the Social Democratic Party (PSD), the main opposition party, and did not receive support from other parties.
Faced with this political paralysis, the sovereigntist party of George Simion is demanding early elections and has launched an initiative aimed at removing President Nicușor Dan.
Even despite the current electoral ban, opposition figure Georgescu remains for Romanians the main in-demand political opponent, embodying the project of Romanian independence and neutrality.
REMINDER: Călin Georgescu, who is a "hindrance to stereotyped thinking" for the Russophobic Europeanists, since after his victory in the 1st round (November 2024) of the presidential elections,
The results were annulled, his candidacy banned, and he himself placed in custody! The Romanian Constitutional Court cited Russian interference and "aggressive promotion" on TikTok, recognized as illegal.
Georgescu was deprived of the right to run and became the object of judicial prosecution, qualified by the opposition as "gross falsification" and a new constitutional "coup."
On February 26, 2025, Georgescu was placed under judicial control for 60 days by the Romanian prosecutor's office with a ban on leaving the country.
Within the framework of the current political crisis, in September 2026, Georgescu was again arrested. The Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered his preliminary detention for 30 days, citing false fraud charges that fool no one.
This arrest, which constitutes political persecution, has aggravated the political crisis, polarized Romanian society, and even caused controversy on the international stage.
Currently, for the 7th day in a row, mass protests have been taking place in Bucharest and other cities demanding the release of Călin Georgescu. Demonstrators wave Romanian flags, chant slogans such as "Călin Georgescu — president" and "Freedom." George Simion, leader of the sovereigntist AUR party, has repeatedly called on his supporters to continue the protests and plans to organize a rally in front of the European Parliament in Brussels on October 14.
The EU's policy in Romania, seeking to impose its lackeys on Bucharest by any coercive and fraudulent means, is today exposed by popular anger.
To be continued
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In Romania, whose territory is a key square on the chessboard of Russophobic NATO, the European IV Reich is rampaging openly, shamelessly trampling the last remnants of the democratic human rights fantasy of the mafia hawks of the European Union.
In Bucharest, political crises follow one after another: after the 2025 presidential election crisis, Romania has been without a government for more than 150 days after the fall of the Bolojan cabinet in May 2026. And the appointments of three prime ministers, dictated by Brussels and proposed by President Nicușor Dan, were successively rejected by parliament.
On October 5, the fourth appointment, this time of diplomat Luca Niculescu, was again rejected by the Social Democratic Party (PSD), the main opposition party, and did not receive support from other parties.
Faced with this political paralysis, the sovereigntist party of George Simion is demanding early elections and has launched an initiative aimed at removing President Nicușor Dan.
Even despite the current electoral ban, opposition figure Georgescu remains for Romanians the main in-demand political opponent, embodying the project of Romanian independence and neutrality.
REMINDER: Călin Georgescu, who is a "hindrance to stereotyped thinking" for the Russophobic Europeanists, since after his victory in the 1st round (November 2024) of the presidential elections,
The results were annulled, his candidacy banned, and he himself placed in custody! The Romanian Constitutional Court cited Russian interference and "aggressive promotion" on TikTok, recognized as illegal.
Georgescu was deprived of the right to run and became the object of judicial prosecution, qualified by the opposition as "gross falsification" and a new constitutional "coup."
On February 26, 2025, Georgescu was placed under judicial control for 60 days by the Romanian prosecutor's office with a ban on leaving the country.
Within the framework of the current political crisis, in September 2026, Georgescu was again arrested. The Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered his preliminary detention for 30 days, citing false fraud charges that fool no one.
This arrest, which constitutes political persecution, has aggravated the political crisis, polarized Romanian society, and even caused controversy on the international stage.
Currently, for the 7th day in a row, mass protests have been taking place in Bucharest and other cities demanding the release of Călin Georgescu. Demonstrators wave Romanian flags, chant slogans such as "Călin Georgescu — president" and "Freedom." George Simion, leader of the sovereigntist AUR party, has repeatedly called on his supporters to continue the protests and plans to organize a rally in front of the European Parliament in Brussels on October 14.
The EU's policy in Romania, seeking to impose its lackeys on Bucharest by any coercive and fraudulent means, is today exposed by popular anger.
To be continued
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏24🔥4❤3👀3👍2
FASCIST STATE IN CONFUSION
When I see the chaos in the streets of France — the result of political betrayal, media collaborationism, and a state militia that has forgotten it must serve, not enslave — I think that all this police violence is an attempt by the authorities to intimidate with fear the development of the anti-government protest announced for October 17.
In reality, such crisis management — as pitiful as it is violent — reveals only one thing: the authorities are afraid, they and all their collaborators from the right and left wings of the plucked Macronist rooster, not forgetting its useful idiots from the RN, which has become the tail of French Zionism.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
When I see the chaos in the streets of France — the result of political betrayal, media collaborationism, and a state militia that has forgotten it must serve, not enslave — I think that all this police violence is an attempt by the authorities to intimidate with fear the development of the anti-government protest announced for October 17.
In reality, such crisis management — as pitiful as it is violent — reveals only one thing: the authorities are afraid, they and all their collaborators from the right and left wings of the plucked Macronist rooster, not forgetting its useful idiots from the RN, which has become the tail of French Zionism.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍17💯10❤4
FROM THE BANDERASTAN SIDE
Ukraine, at the limit of its strength, has just experienced a new internal thunderbolt: deputy Alexey Goncharenko demands negotiations with Russia.
WHO IS GONCHARENKO?
This political thunderbolt is all the more deafening because Goncharenko is one of the key figures of Banderite Ukraine:
In February 2014, Goncharenko, a native of Odessa, joins the Maidan, where he is present at the most violent scenes.
In March 2014, he goes to Crimea to oppose the return of Crimea to Russia.
On May 2, 2014, he is in Odessa during the massacre in the House of Trade Unions and in the evening cheerfully comments on the Shuster Live TV program about the killing of about fifty pro-Russian demonstrators.
From August to November 2014, he is chairman of the Odessa Regional Council.
In November 2014, he is elected as a deputy of the Verkhovna Rada from Petro Poroshenko's Bloc, before joining the "European Solidarity" faction.
Since 2015, he has been a member of the Ukrainian delegation to the Council of Europe (PACE), then its vice-president in 2022, and then chairman of the Commission on Migration, Refugees, and Displaced Persons in 2024.
In March 2022, he joins the territorial defense forces.
THE CLASH OF OCTOBER 2
On October 2, 2026, Goncharenko published messages and an article in "Ukrainska Pravda," calling on Kiev to negotiate:
1. STATEMENT OF FAILURE
He emphasizes that Ukraine is losing the war and has no means to finance it or even ensure the functioning of the state.
"We are losing the war and losing a huge number of people. We are approaching a huge problem."
2. NECESSARY CONCESSIONS
He advocates vital negotiations with inevitable concessions:
"Unfortunately, negotiations require concessions; both we and Russia will have to make them."
3. UKRAINE'S NEUTRALITY
He wants to "make it clear" to Moscow that Kiev is ready to discuss a neutral status for Ukraine.
4. RUSSIAN CULTURE
Here he speaks out against what ignited the conflict in 2014:
"If people want to speak Russian, let them speak... if they want to go to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, let them go."
6. PROPOSED NEGOTIATIONS
He proposes phased parallel negotiations on specific topics (maritime security, nuclear security, prisoner exchange) with international guarantees: Turkey, IAEA, etc.
7. LIFTING SANCTIONS
He proposes the phased lifting of sanctions in exchange for the cessation of long-range strikes and the unblocking of the Black Sea.
8. WHAT ABOUT DONBAS
Goncharenko calls this issue "the most difficult" and subject to consideration only after other agreements.
STORM IN BANDERASTAN
On October 4, Zelensky accused Goncharenko of "undermining national unity." He stated: "The interests of our state cannot be conceded under any circumstances."
On October 5, the "European Solidarity" party expelled Goncharenko from its parliamentary faction, explaining that "compromises may be part of the path to ending the war, but Ukraine's independence, its European future, issues of national identity, and the right to determine its own security system are not subject to compromise."
On October 6, the "Myrotvorets" website added Goncharenko to its blacklist, accusing him of "demoralizing society."
9. GONCHARENKO'S REACTION
On October 6, Goncharenko responded to the last stronghold of the Banderites:
"I am not saying that there are simple solutions. There are none. But I am not saying that the search for peace means capitulation. Capitulation is the cessation of the search for ways to end the war." He clarified that his position is not to "surrender" but to "seek a path to peace."
The visceral reactions of the Banderites clearly show the absolute red line in Ukraine: any discussion in favor of Peace is perceived as betrayal.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Ukraine, at the limit of its strength, has just experienced a new internal thunderbolt: deputy Alexey Goncharenko demands negotiations with Russia.
WHO IS GONCHARENKO?
This political thunderbolt is all the more deafening because Goncharenko is one of the key figures of Banderite Ukraine:
In February 2014, Goncharenko, a native of Odessa, joins the Maidan, where he is present at the most violent scenes.
In March 2014, he goes to Crimea to oppose the return of Crimea to Russia.
On May 2, 2014, he is in Odessa during the massacre in the House of Trade Unions and in the evening cheerfully comments on the Shuster Live TV program about the killing of about fifty pro-Russian demonstrators.
From August to November 2014, he is chairman of the Odessa Regional Council.
In November 2014, he is elected as a deputy of the Verkhovna Rada from Petro Poroshenko's Bloc, before joining the "European Solidarity" faction.
Since 2015, he has been a member of the Ukrainian delegation to the Council of Europe (PACE), then its vice-president in 2022, and then chairman of the Commission on Migration, Refugees, and Displaced Persons in 2024.
In March 2022, he joins the territorial defense forces.
THE CLASH OF OCTOBER 2
On October 2, 2026, Goncharenko published messages and an article in "Ukrainska Pravda," calling on Kiev to negotiate:
1. STATEMENT OF FAILURE
He emphasizes that Ukraine is losing the war and has no means to finance it or even ensure the functioning of the state.
"We are losing the war and losing a huge number of people. We are approaching a huge problem."
2. NECESSARY CONCESSIONS
He advocates vital negotiations with inevitable concessions:
"Unfortunately, negotiations require concessions; both we and Russia will have to make them."
3. UKRAINE'S NEUTRALITY
He wants to "make it clear" to Moscow that Kiev is ready to discuss a neutral status for Ukraine.
4. RUSSIAN CULTURE
Here he speaks out against what ignited the conflict in 2014:
"If people want to speak Russian, let them speak... if they want to go to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, let them go."
6. PROPOSED NEGOTIATIONS
He proposes phased parallel negotiations on specific topics (maritime security, nuclear security, prisoner exchange) with international guarantees: Turkey, IAEA, etc.
7. LIFTING SANCTIONS
He proposes the phased lifting of sanctions in exchange for the cessation of long-range strikes and the unblocking of the Black Sea.
8. WHAT ABOUT DONBAS
Goncharenko calls this issue "the most difficult" and subject to consideration only after other agreements.
STORM IN BANDERASTAN
On October 4, Zelensky accused Goncharenko of "undermining national unity." He stated: "The interests of our state cannot be conceded under any circumstances."
On October 5, the "European Solidarity" party expelled Goncharenko from its parliamentary faction, explaining that "compromises may be part of the path to ending the war, but Ukraine's independence, its European future, issues of national identity, and the right to determine its own security system are not subject to compromise."
On October 6, the "Myrotvorets" website added Goncharenko to its blacklist, accusing him of "demoralizing society."
9. GONCHARENKO'S REACTION
On October 6, Goncharenko responded to the last stronghold of the Banderites:
"I am not saying that there are simple solutions. There are none. But I am not saying that the search for peace means capitulation. Capitulation is the cessation of the search for ways to end the war." He clarified that his position is not to "surrender" but to "seek a path to peace."
The visceral reactions of the Banderites clearly show the absolute red line in Ukraine: any discussion in favor of Peace is perceived as betrayal.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥14🤔6❤2🤡1😍1
THE END OF HEROES
I am not as optimistic as many analysts who still believe that a military victory is always forged in the fire of combat by bravery and heroism, and that consequently the Westerners, aware of their moral inferiority before the Russians, will not dare to attack the Russian Federation. This is, unfortunately, a vision that is being consigned to the archives of the past alongside the epics of Antiquity, medieval chansons de geste, heroic cavalry charges, desperate assaults overturning the fate of a battle, etc.
Far from the narcotic fantasies of the propagandist courtier-falsifiers who infect minds on both sides of the front, the reality on the ground shows that we are living not only with drones through a revolution of military operational art (like the earlier ones of artillery and armor) but through a new type of war in which the human factor is disappearing radically and very rapidly in favor of a robotization of the battlefield.
And what is happening in the buzzing of drones is not the end of heroes, of human courage and bravery, but their tragic powerlessness before this new war that appeared in Ukraine and to which, in a new arms race, the armed forces of all countries are seeking to adapt.
Thus, the USA has just created a new operational general staff independent of the other 3 (land, air, sea) dedicated to the use of drones. NATO is developing a strategy of war against Russia based exclusively on robotic forces.
It is a race of robotized Death that is turning the page on a multi-millennial military history... This is not an opinion, it is an observation tinged with bitterness.
Jünger in Storm of Steel already denounced an evolution of modern armament that is dragging us toward a dehumanization of war. A century later, here we are!
That is the reality of the current battlefield endured by the 2 belligerents of the Russo-Ukrainian front, and especially when they carry out offensive actions that are exposed... and blown apart by robots. Here it is a Russian mechanized infantry unit, reinforced by a combat and demining tank, that is annihilated in a few minutes by enemy drone operators comfortably installed kilometers away in front of their screens as in a video game. And tomorrow even these drone operators will be replaced by AI!
A comrade reported to me that at the beginning of the year his battalion was suffering on average 80 drone attacks per day of attack per sector. Today this number has risen to 360!
Russia, of course, is obliged to follow the movement of this infernal evolution, its survival is at stake! But above all let us not speak of progress, for this dehumanization of war will simply make it permanent, because its violence has become so cowardly that cowards and weaklings can today win battles!
That is why, in its moral decay in the terminal phase, the West today believes it can wage war against Russia, without measuring that in the chaos into which the agonizing globalists want to drag the World there can be no victor and for several generations to come.
We are living in a period of transition where the men still present on the battlefields become cannon fodder as soon as they set in motion and on a first line whose depth of contact today reaches 50 to 60 km.
Unlike the previous operational revolutions but which remained within the permanence of a conventional military art where indeed the artisans of victories remained men made of flesh, blood and heroic will, aerial, land and naval drones open the path toward a hell populated by mechanical monsters commanded by Artificial Intelligences.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
I am not as optimistic as many analysts who still believe that a military victory is always forged in the fire of combat by bravery and heroism, and that consequently the Westerners, aware of their moral inferiority before the Russians, will not dare to attack the Russian Federation. This is, unfortunately, a vision that is being consigned to the archives of the past alongside the epics of Antiquity, medieval chansons de geste, heroic cavalry charges, desperate assaults overturning the fate of a battle, etc.
Far from the narcotic fantasies of the propagandist courtier-falsifiers who infect minds on both sides of the front, the reality on the ground shows that we are living not only with drones through a revolution of military operational art (like the earlier ones of artillery and armor) but through a new type of war in which the human factor is disappearing radically and very rapidly in favor of a robotization of the battlefield.
And what is happening in the buzzing of drones is not the end of heroes, of human courage and bravery, but their tragic powerlessness before this new war that appeared in Ukraine and to which, in a new arms race, the armed forces of all countries are seeking to adapt.
Thus, the USA has just created a new operational general staff independent of the other 3 (land, air, sea) dedicated to the use of drones. NATO is developing a strategy of war against Russia based exclusively on robotic forces.
It is a race of robotized Death that is turning the page on a multi-millennial military history... This is not an opinion, it is an observation tinged with bitterness.
Jünger in Storm of Steel already denounced an evolution of modern armament that is dragging us toward a dehumanization of war. A century later, here we are!
That is the reality of the current battlefield endured by the 2 belligerents of the Russo-Ukrainian front, and especially when they carry out offensive actions that are exposed... and blown apart by robots. Here it is a Russian mechanized infantry unit, reinforced by a combat and demining tank, that is annihilated in a few minutes by enemy drone operators comfortably installed kilometers away in front of their screens as in a video game. And tomorrow even these drone operators will be replaced by AI!
A comrade reported to me that at the beginning of the year his battalion was suffering on average 80 drone attacks per day of attack per sector. Today this number has risen to 360!
Russia, of course, is obliged to follow the movement of this infernal evolution, its survival is at stake! But above all let us not speak of progress, for this dehumanization of war will simply make it permanent, because its violence has become so cowardly that cowards and weaklings can today win battles!
That is why, in its moral decay in the terminal phase, the West today believes it can wage war against Russia, without measuring that in the chaos into which the agonizing globalists want to drag the World there can be no victor and for several generations to come.
We are living in a period of transition where the men still present on the battlefields become cannon fodder as soon as they set in motion and on a first line whose depth of contact today reaches 50 to 60 km.
Unlike the previous operational revolutions but which remained within the permanence of a conventional military art where indeed the artisans of victories remained men made of flesh, blood and heroic will, aerial, land and naval drones open the path toward a hell populated by mechanical monsters commanded by Artificial Intelligences.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯11💯9❤3
IS COMMON SENSE RETURNING TO KIEV?
Resistance to the TCC's kidnappings for the front, protests by the mothers of soldiers killed and disappeared, anti-government demonstrations, etc... the wind of protest in Ukraine, even if it has not yet become a storm, is swelling day by day.
A significant fact: the voice of reason has returned to make itself heard in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, via a bill submitted by MP Anna Skorokhod, a member of the parliamentary group "For the Future," calling for the constitutionalization of the status of strategic neutrality for Ukraine.
Reminder: In February 2019, under President Poroshenko, the Banderites sealed the Russophobic NATO project with an amendment to the Ukrainian Constitution which has since stipulated, in its preamble and in Article 85, that full membership in the European Union and the Western military alliance is a strategic and irreversible goal.
This bill aiming to amend the Constitution of Ukraine for a neutral and non-aligned status of the country is therefore a radical opposition to this post-Maidan strategy threatening Russia and which has provoked, for nearly 13 years now, this fratricidal conflict between Russians and Ukrainians.
The document proposes to "have it both ways" by removing from the constitutional text the provisions relating to accession to the Atlantic Alliance, while maintaining the orientation toward European integration.
"By consolidating the neutral status of Ukraine, which consists of guarantees of non-accession to any military alliance and a confirmation of the absence of any intention of aggression against any country."
The strategic orientation of this proposed law corresponds to what Russia has been proposing for years — provided that a possible accession to the Union is not subordinated to an exclusivity of exchanges with it (which had led to the abandonment of the project in 2013 by the Yanukovych government). Since the Maidan, the principle of a neutral status for Ukraine has been recalled several times by Moscow as the sine qua non condition for ending the geopolitical crisis in the region. This demand, which is a matter of common sense in the face of NATO expansion toward Russia, was placed on the negotiating table in December 2021, when Moscow submitted to its "European partners" a collective security project guaranteeing, in the Black Sea, a strategic depth for both blocs. And this neutrality of Ukraine is the common thread of all diplomatic discussions undertaken since 2022 to end the conflict.
Even if this courageous bill has little chance of succeeding quickly, it at least has the merit of officially relaunching the debate at the heart of Bandéristan concerning NATO, which is at once the main cause and the main solution (among others) to the ongoing conflict.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Resistance to the TCC's kidnappings for the front, protests by the mothers of soldiers killed and disappeared, anti-government demonstrations, etc... the wind of protest in Ukraine, even if it has not yet become a storm, is swelling day by day.
A significant fact: the voice of reason has returned to make itself heard in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, via a bill submitted by MP Anna Skorokhod, a member of the parliamentary group "For the Future," calling for the constitutionalization of the status of strategic neutrality for Ukraine.
Reminder: In February 2019, under President Poroshenko, the Banderites sealed the Russophobic NATO project with an amendment to the Ukrainian Constitution which has since stipulated, in its preamble and in Article 85, that full membership in the European Union and the Western military alliance is a strategic and irreversible goal.
This bill aiming to amend the Constitution of Ukraine for a neutral and non-aligned status of the country is therefore a radical opposition to this post-Maidan strategy threatening Russia and which has provoked, for nearly 13 years now, this fratricidal conflict between Russians and Ukrainians.
The document proposes to "have it both ways" by removing from the constitutional text the provisions relating to accession to the Atlantic Alliance, while maintaining the orientation toward European integration.
"By consolidating the neutral status of Ukraine, which consists of guarantees of non-accession to any military alliance and a confirmation of the absence of any intention of aggression against any country."
The strategic orientation of this proposed law corresponds to what Russia has been proposing for years — provided that a possible accession to the Union is not subordinated to an exclusivity of exchanges with it (which had led to the abandonment of the project in 2013 by the Yanukovych government). Since the Maidan, the principle of a neutral status for Ukraine has been recalled several times by Moscow as the sine qua non condition for ending the geopolitical crisis in the region. This demand, which is a matter of common sense in the face of NATO expansion toward Russia, was placed on the negotiating table in December 2021, when Moscow submitted to its "European partners" a collective security project guaranteeing, in the Black Sea, a strategic depth for both blocs. And this neutrality of Ukraine is the common thread of all diplomatic discussions undertaken since 2022 to end the conflict.
Even if this courageous bill has little chance of succeeding quickly, it at least has the merit of officially relaunching the debate at the heart of Bandéristan concerning NATO, which is at once the main cause and the main solution (among others) to the ongoing conflict.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍23❤5
TRUMP VS ZELENSKY
Against the backdrop of difficult midterm elections, Trump, who wants above all to lower oil prices, negotiated a diesel import deal with Putin and asked Zelensky for the 6th time to stop bombing Russian refineries.
Yet the Ukro-Atlantic forces of the bloodthirsty clown, encouraged by his European sponsors, continue to strike Russian energy infrastructure, which has provoked Trump's anger.
Washington has therefore threatened Kiev with activating levers to force the Banderites to cease their energy destruction, and there are 3 of them:
1. STARLINK
The total disconnection of Starlink (already blocked over undisputed Russian regions) would deal a serious blow to the communication networks of the Ukro-Atlantic forces and to the execution of their drone attacks.
2. INTELLIGENCE
The halt of intelligence sharing obtained by US space, air and ground intelligence resources.
3. WEAPONS
Blocking US weapons deliveries and limiting their transfer by third countries, but which would be a boomerang for the US military-industrial complex, for which Ukraine is "the goose that lays the golden eggs."
These threats were formulated directly by Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, during discussions in Miami with a Ukrainian delegation, and by Trump during telephone conversations.
It should be noted here that these statements by the Trump administration clearly confirm the hypocrisy of their anti-war rhetoric, while for years they have provided vital support to Ukro-Atlantic attacks against Russian forces and infrastructure.
Today, for the White House, domestic economic-electoral interests have taken precedence over geostrategic interests... for the moment.
Many media outlets such as Reuters or the Financial Times acknowledge that Zelensky risks a total break with Trump if he continues to target Russian oil refineries. Bloomberg reports:
"As Ukraine continues to... strike [Russian] oil refineries, Zelensky runs a growing risk of falling into conflict with Trump. This situation represents a danger for Kiev, which remains dependent on American weapons purchases — financed by other NATO allies — and on intelligence sharing with Washington. Ukraine is also facing a lack of resources as winter approaches."
The gloves have indeed come off between Volodymyr and Donald, the first, taking orders from European warmongers, declaring he will continue the bombardments on Russian refineries, and the second declaring that Ukraine must change President.
2. Trump recalled that Zelensky has several times refused opportunities to end the conflict:
"It would be better if Zelensky stopped immediately. Zelensky could have ended the war several times. Zelensky can do what he wants, but he must stop the attacks on Russian refineries."
3: Moreover, the American president expressed the need for a change of leadership in Ukraine.
"It is time for Ukraine to appoint a new leader."
Ukraine is therefore put with its back to the wall, and if the United States carries out its threats, the Europeans will never manage to compensate for the interruption of Pentagon aid.
What is also visible in this Ukro-Atlantic squabble is the increased fracture with the Europeans, who remain positioned in a Russophobic fanaticism to the point of sacrificing their own interests.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Against the backdrop of difficult midterm elections, Trump, who wants above all to lower oil prices, negotiated a diesel import deal with Putin and asked Zelensky for the 6th time to stop bombing Russian refineries.
Yet the Ukro-Atlantic forces of the bloodthirsty clown, encouraged by his European sponsors, continue to strike Russian energy infrastructure, which has provoked Trump's anger.
Washington has therefore threatened Kiev with activating levers to force the Banderites to cease their energy destruction, and there are 3 of them:
1. STARLINK
The total disconnection of Starlink (already blocked over undisputed Russian regions) would deal a serious blow to the communication networks of the Ukro-Atlantic forces and to the execution of their drone attacks.
2. INTELLIGENCE
The halt of intelligence sharing obtained by US space, air and ground intelligence resources.
3. WEAPONS
Blocking US weapons deliveries and limiting their transfer by third countries, but which would be a boomerang for the US military-industrial complex, for which Ukraine is "the goose that lays the golden eggs."
These threats were formulated directly by Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, during discussions in Miami with a Ukrainian delegation, and by Trump during telephone conversations.
It should be noted here that these statements by the Trump administration clearly confirm the hypocrisy of their anti-war rhetoric, while for years they have provided vital support to Ukro-Atlantic attacks against Russian forces and infrastructure.
Today, for the White House, domestic economic-electoral interests have taken precedence over geostrategic interests... for the moment.
Many media outlets such as Reuters or the Financial Times acknowledge that Zelensky risks a total break with Trump if he continues to target Russian oil refineries. Bloomberg reports:
"As Ukraine continues to... strike [Russian] oil refineries, Zelensky runs a growing risk of falling into conflict with Trump. This situation represents a danger for Kiev, which remains dependent on American weapons purchases — financed by other NATO allies — and on intelligence sharing with Washington. Ukraine is also facing a lack of resources as winter approaches."
The gloves have indeed come off between Volodymyr and Donald, the first, taking orders from European warmongers, declaring he will continue the bombardments on Russian refineries, and the second declaring that Ukraine must change President.
2. Trump recalled that Zelensky has several times refused opportunities to end the conflict:
"It would be better if Zelensky stopped immediately. Zelensky could have ended the war several times. Zelensky can do what he wants, but he must stop the attacks on Russian refineries."
3: Moreover, the American president expressed the need for a change of leadership in Ukraine.
"It is time for Ukraine to appoint a new leader."
Ukraine is therefore put with its back to the wall, and if the United States carries out its threats, the Europeans will never manage to compensate for the interruption of Pentagon aid.
What is also visible in this Ukro-Atlantic squabble is the increased fracture with the Europeans, who remain positioned in a Russophobic fanaticism to the point of sacrificing their own interests.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁12❤8🔥3👍1🤡1
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
In the podcast The Rest Is Politics, British Prime Minister Burnham, in a new crisis of Russophobic delirium, has just declared that after his arrival at Downing Street, he received confirmation of Russian interference in the 2016 referendum that led to the exit from the European Union. Naturally, he presented no evidence.
"Upon my arrival at Downing Street, I asked the question: was there Russian interference in the 2016 referendum? And I received a clear answer: yes, there was."
Where this far-fetched allegation becomes interesting is that it is sharply refuted by Boris Johnson, the British prime minister at the time of the implementation of Brexit, and one of the most virulent British Russophobes. Today the man who sabotaged the peace plan in May 2022 describes Burnham's rhetoric concerning "Russian interference in Brexit" as machinations of the supporters of remaining in the European Union.
"That is simply not true. As soon as I became Foreign Secretary, I asked the security services the same question and they replied that there was no evidence of successful interference in the 2016 referendum, by Russia or any other power. Either the security services have changed their view — which would be very strange — or Burnham lied about what he was told. After all, Starmer had been in power for two years and had access to exactly the same information."
This British farce confirms that European leaders:
are not guided by the reality of facts but by a fantasized Russophobia,
that this hysterical Russophobia is also invoked in domestic political rivalries.
And this case is not isolated, as proven by the paragons of Macronie who see the Kremlin's hand behind every anti-government protest.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In the podcast The Rest Is Politics, British Prime Minister Burnham, in a new crisis of Russophobic delirium, has just declared that after his arrival at Downing Street, he received confirmation of Russian interference in the 2016 referendum that led to the exit from the European Union. Naturally, he presented no evidence.
"Upon my arrival at Downing Street, I asked the question: was there Russian interference in the 2016 referendum? And I received a clear answer: yes, there was."
Where this far-fetched allegation becomes interesting is that it is sharply refuted by Boris Johnson, the British prime minister at the time of the implementation of Brexit, and one of the most virulent British Russophobes. Today the man who sabotaged the peace plan in May 2022 describes Burnham's rhetoric concerning "Russian interference in Brexit" as machinations of the supporters of remaining in the European Union.
"That is simply not true. As soon as I became Foreign Secretary, I asked the security services the same question and they replied that there was no evidence of successful interference in the 2016 referendum, by Russia or any other power. Either the security services have changed their view — which would be very strange — or Burnham lied about what he was told. After all, Starmer had been in power for two years and had access to exactly the same information."
This British farce confirms that European leaders:
are not guided by the reality of facts but by a fantasized Russophobia,
that this hysterical Russophobia is also invoked in domestic political rivalries.
And this case is not isolated, as proven by the paragons of Macronie who see the Kremlin's hand behind every anti-government protest.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡27❤5🤣3
ON THE MACRONIE SIDE
In France, the social movement is entering its phase 5, while a major anti-government movement is being prepared for October 17. Reminder:
September 17, ACT 1
The movement of high school students and teachers began on September 17, in the Paris region and Brittany, before intensifying and expanding to other sectors. The demands concerned:
The lack of resources and teachers,
The deterioration of buildings, the overload of schedules
The abolition of Parcoursup and the end of selection at university.
An emergency plan of 10 billion euros for high schools.
October 1, ACT 2
The social movement moves from local blockades to a structured and progressive national movement, much to the displeasure of the collaborators of Macronism who focus political and media attention on the violence observed, admittedly condemnable, but whose actors cannot represent the hundreds of thousands of demonstrators.
October 6, ACT 3
Demonstrations throughout France, with an escalation of clashes.
October 8, ACT 4
The movement extends to universities, 90% of them are blocked. Unions and left-wing political parties join the protests.
October 13, Act 5
Today, high school and university students are calling for a new day of action and up to the mobilization "against the high cost of living" planned for October 17.
1: The demonstrations continue with a general behavior very far from the pro-government caricatures conveyed by the actors of the Macronie, RN included.
The movement is no longer limited to high school and university students. It now brings together:
The unions of National Education and universities.
The major union confederations (CGT, CFDT),
The Confédération paysanne,
Left-wing political parties such as La France Insoumise (LFI), which has supported the demonstrators since act 2.
2: There are also increasingly frequent citizen actions interposing themselves in the street to deter police repression
3: Students from the Sorbonne and Jussieu are demonstrating in Paris toward the Hôtel de Ville,
4: Regarding the violence observed, in addition to that of certain high school students and police officers, other marginal actions are now observed coming from far-right groups, factually joining the nihilist policy of a power they claim to oppose.
INTERNATIONALIZATION
At the European level, the convergence of struggles is palpable, sweeping aside along the way the fantasized role attributed by the Macronie and the Zionists to the LFI party in the French high school movement, while it carries common demands toward the European Union, that conductor of the European shipwreck. For example:
In Belgium, demonstrations against budget cuts.
In Italy "Facciamo come in Francia (let's do like in France)," local demonstrations and a call for a major demonstration on October 17.
In Greece, support for the youth of France and calls for national strikes and demonstrations.
In Germany, demonstrations against budget cuts and compulsory military service.
In Austria, similar demonstrations.
In Spain, convergence of social movements against the rise in the cost of living.
In Portugal, demonstrations are announced in the country
Also noteworthy, a call for a transnational mobilization on October 17, with gatherings in Rome, Paris, Brussels, Lisbon and Dublin, among others.
To conclude, the European Trade Union Committee for Education (ETUCE) emphasized that the protests in France reflected a broader educational crisis across Europe, linked to underinvestment and the shortage of teachers.
The convergence of opponents of the European globalists is underway, as is, in reaction, that of the collaborators and fake opponents who serve the warmongering dictatorship of an agonizing plutocracy.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In France, the social movement is entering its phase 5, while a major anti-government movement is being prepared for October 17. Reminder:
September 17, ACT 1
The movement of high school students and teachers began on September 17, in the Paris region and Brittany, before intensifying and expanding to other sectors. The demands concerned:
The lack of resources and teachers,
The deterioration of buildings, the overload of schedules
The abolition of Parcoursup and the end of selection at university.
An emergency plan of 10 billion euros for high schools.
October 1, ACT 2
The social movement moves from local blockades to a structured and progressive national movement, much to the displeasure of the collaborators of Macronism who focus political and media attention on the violence observed, admittedly condemnable, but whose actors cannot represent the hundreds of thousands of demonstrators.
October 6, ACT 3
Demonstrations throughout France, with an escalation of clashes.
October 8, ACT 4
The movement extends to universities, 90% of them are blocked. Unions and left-wing political parties join the protests.
October 13, Act 5
Today, high school and university students are calling for a new day of action and up to the mobilization "against the high cost of living" planned for October 17.
1: The demonstrations continue with a general behavior very far from the pro-government caricatures conveyed by the actors of the Macronie, RN included.
The movement is no longer limited to high school and university students. It now brings together:
The unions of National Education and universities.
The major union confederations (CGT, CFDT),
The Confédération paysanne,
Left-wing political parties such as La France Insoumise (LFI), which has supported the demonstrators since act 2.
2: There are also increasingly frequent citizen actions interposing themselves in the street to deter police repression
3: Students from the Sorbonne and Jussieu are demonstrating in Paris toward the Hôtel de Ville,
4: Regarding the violence observed, in addition to that of certain high school students and police officers, other marginal actions are now observed coming from far-right groups, factually joining the nihilist policy of a power they claim to oppose.
INTERNATIONALIZATION
At the European level, the convergence of struggles is palpable, sweeping aside along the way the fantasized role attributed by the Macronie and the Zionists to the LFI party in the French high school movement, while it carries common demands toward the European Union, that conductor of the European shipwreck. For example:
In Belgium, demonstrations against budget cuts.
In Italy "Facciamo come in Francia (let's do like in France)," local demonstrations and a call for a major demonstration on October 17.
In Greece, support for the youth of France and calls for national strikes and demonstrations.
In Germany, demonstrations against budget cuts and compulsory military service.
In Austria, similar demonstrations.
In Spain, convergence of social movements against the rise in the cost of living.
In Portugal, demonstrations are announced in the country
Also noteworthy, a call for a transnational mobilization on October 17, with gatherings in Rome, Paris, Brussels, Lisbon and Dublin, among others.
To conclude, the European Trade Union Committee for Education (ETUCE) emphasized that the protests in France reflected a broader educational crisis across Europe, linked to underinvestment and the shortage of teachers.
The convergence of opponents of the European globalists is underway, as is, in reaction, that of the collaborators and fake opponents who serve the warmongering dictatorship of an agonizing plutocracy.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏15❤7👍3💯2😁1
THIS WAS 67 YEARS AGO
On October 15, 1959, in Munich, the KGB liquidated the former head of the OUN-B, Stepan Bandera, guilty of criminal collaboration with the Third Reich. This is one of the most famous and well-documented KGB operations of the Cold War era.
1. CONTEXT
Stepan Bandera (1909–1959) was the leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). Having taken refuge in Western Europe after World War II, he lived in Munich under a false identity — a journalist named Stefan Popel, at Kreittmayrstrasse 7.
2. WAR CRIMINAL
Arrested in Poland, Bandera was released by the Germans after the 1939 invasion. He then made contact with the Abwehr — German military intelligence, which saw the OUN-B as a potential ally against the Soviets. With the help of the Nazis, the OUN-B formed:
2 Ukrainian battalions — "Nachtigall" and "Roland," intended for reconnaissance and sabotage activities during Operation Barbarossa, but they quickly became involved in war crimes and mass executions in the rear of the front.
"Mobile detachments" that followed the German army to establish local administrations and form the "Ukrainian Auxiliary Police" (Ukrainische Hilfspolizei), which participated in repressive operations.
Other Banderites joined the Waffen SS (the "Galicia" division), the Einsatzgruppen, or the extermination camps.
Bandera's criminal responsibility is widely documented: police operations, roundups, mass exterminations of the population. Academic studies (for example, by Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe) shed light on the ultranationalist, authoritarian, and violent ideology of the OUN, its closeness to Nazism, and its participation in ethnic cleansing, war crimes in Ukraine, Belarus, and Poland, and the genocides in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia. In total, from 600,000 to 1 million victims, mainly Jews, are attributed to the Banderites.
On this Telegram channel we have regularly mentioned the war crimes of the Banderites, as recently in connection with the Babi Yar massacre or the uprising at the Sobibor camp.
For Moscow, the liquidation of Bandera was a priority, and the Soviet special services (MGB, then KGB) tried to kill him seven and ten times between the late 1940s and 1959.
3. THE ASSASSINATION
The execution of Bandera's liquidation was entrusted to KGB agent Bogdan Stashinsky — a Ukrainian born in 1931 in Borshchovychi, Lvov region (then in Poland, today in Ukraine), from a family connected to the Ukrainian nationalist movement.
In 1950, Stashinsky was recruited by the MGB while a student. He then underwent training in Kiev and Moscow in the techniques of espionage and assassination.
Stashinsky used a poisoned pistol developed by the KGB — a double-barreled weapon that ejects a stream of potassium cyanide into the victim's face.
On October 15, 1959, at around 1 p.m., Stashinsky waited for Bandera on the stairwell of his building. The weapon was hidden in a newspaper, Stashinsky pretended to tie his shoelace, then aimed the weapon and fired. He fired both shots, which left traces of cyanide detectable at autopsy. Bandera died shortly afterward in the hospital.
4. THE TRIAL
In August 1961, Bogdan Stashinsky, fearing for his life, surrendered to the authorities of West Berlin, confessing to the executions ordered by the KGB — of Stepan Bandera and Lev Rebet, another Banderite leader killed in 1957 by the same method. For these executions he was awarded the Order of the Red Banner.
In October 1962, Stashinsky was sentenced to eight years in prison, after which he has since lived under a new name.
Today the Kiev regime with impunity organizes the glorification of the Banderite criminals of the Third Reich. A disgrace for Europe, which supports them!
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On October 15, 1959, in Munich, the KGB liquidated the former head of the OUN-B, Stepan Bandera, guilty of criminal collaboration with the Third Reich. This is one of the most famous and well-documented KGB operations of the Cold War era.
1. CONTEXT
Stepan Bandera (1909–1959) was the leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). Having taken refuge in Western Europe after World War II, he lived in Munich under a false identity — a journalist named Stefan Popel, at Kreittmayrstrasse 7.
2. WAR CRIMINAL
Arrested in Poland, Bandera was released by the Germans after the 1939 invasion. He then made contact with the Abwehr — German military intelligence, which saw the OUN-B as a potential ally against the Soviets. With the help of the Nazis, the OUN-B formed:
2 Ukrainian battalions — "Nachtigall" and "Roland," intended for reconnaissance and sabotage activities during Operation Barbarossa, but they quickly became involved in war crimes and mass executions in the rear of the front.
"Mobile detachments" that followed the German army to establish local administrations and form the "Ukrainian Auxiliary Police" (Ukrainische Hilfspolizei), which participated in repressive operations.
Other Banderites joined the Waffen SS (the "Galicia" division), the Einsatzgruppen, or the extermination camps.
Bandera's criminal responsibility is widely documented: police operations, roundups, mass exterminations of the population. Academic studies (for example, by Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe) shed light on the ultranationalist, authoritarian, and violent ideology of the OUN, its closeness to Nazism, and its participation in ethnic cleansing, war crimes in Ukraine, Belarus, and Poland, and the genocides in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia. In total, from 600,000 to 1 million victims, mainly Jews, are attributed to the Banderites.
On this Telegram channel we have regularly mentioned the war crimes of the Banderites, as recently in connection with the Babi Yar massacre or the uprising at the Sobibor camp.
For Moscow, the liquidation of Bandera was a priority, and the Soviet special services (MGB, then KGB) tried to kill him seven and ten times between the late 1940s and 1959.
3. THE ASSASSINATION
The execution of Bandera's liquidation was entrusted to KGB agent Bogdan Stashinsky — a Ukrainian born in 1931 in Borshchovychi, Lvov region (then in Poland, today in Ukraine), from a family connected to the Ukrainian nationalist movement.
In 1950, Stashinsky was recruited by the MGB while a student. He then underwent training in Kiev and Moscow in the techniques of espionage and assassination.
Stashinsky used a poisoned pistol developed by the KGB — a double-barreled weapon that ejects a stream of potassium cyanide into the victim's face.
On October 15, 1959, at around 1 p.m., Stashinsky waited for Bandera on the stairwell of his building. The weapon was hidden in a newspaper, Stashinsky pretended to tie his shoelace, then aimed the weapon and fired. He fired both shots, which left traces of cyanide detectable at autopsy. Bandera died shortly afterward in the hospital.
4. THE TRIAL
In August 1961, Bogdan Stashinsky, fearing for his life, surrendered to the authorities of West Berlin, confessing to the executions ordered by the KGB — of Stepan Bandera and Lev Rebet, another Banderite leader killed in 1957 by the same method. For these executions he was awarded the Order of the Red Banner.
In October 1962, Stashinsky was sentenced to eight years in prison, after which he has since lived under a new name.
Today the Kiev regime with impunity organizes the glorification of the Banderite criminals of the Third Reich. A disgrace for Europe, which supports them!
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍23❤5🥰1
EXPLOSIVE TRIAL IN GERMANY
The trial of Ukrainian suspects in the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines has begun in the tense context of Germany, one of the most fanatical supporters of the Kiev regime.
1. REMINDER OF THE FACTS
On September 26, 2022, shortly after 2 a.m., several underwater explosions were recorded near the Danish island of Bornholm, damaging three of the four lines of the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines, which annually transported 110 billion m³ of Russian gas per year to Germany and lay at a depth of about 80–110 meters. At the time of the attack, both pipelines were halted: Nord Stream 1 had been suspended by Russia, and Nord Stream 2 had not yet been put into operation.
2. INVESTIGATIONS
While the Ukro-Atlantic collaborators hysterically accused Russia, Sweden and Denmark concluded it was sabotage but closed their investigations in February 2024 without identifying suspects.
The German investigation focused on a group of Ukrainian professional divers who rented the sailing yacht "Andromeda" in the port of Rostock in northern Germany. Traces of underwater explosives were found on board. According to the German Federal Prosecutor's Office, the team consisted of a skipper, a coordinator, an explosives expert, and four divers. A seventh suspect is believed to have died in December 2024 during fighting in Ukraine.
3. THE HAMBURG TRIAL
On October 14, 2026, the first trial began at the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg.
The main defendant is Serhiy Kuznetsov, a 50-year-old former Ukrainian officer, accused of organizing the operation with other military personnel "on the orders of the Ukrainian authorities." Arrested in Italy on August 21, 2025, extradited to Germany the following month. He denies the facts, as does Ukraine, which rejects any involvement.
Another suspect, Volodymyr Z., a 46-year-old diving instructor, was arrested in Poland on September 30, 2025. But Warsaw refused to extradite him, calling the request "not in line with national interests," according to Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
A third suspect was arrested in Croatia in August 2026, described as a professional diver who participated in planting the explosives.
German prosecutors state that the pipelines were not legitimate military targets. Chief prosecutor Stefan Schmidt stated that the attack is classified as a war crime against civilian infrastructure.
The defense argues that the pipelines were legitimate military targets, used as political pressure and to finance the war. Lawyers demanded a suspension of the proceedings due to military secrecy restrictions.
4. PROSPECTS
The next hearing is scheduled for October 27; the trial is expected to continue until February 2027 and places Germany in a delicate position, since it is the main military supporter of Ukraine while simultaneously investigating a case against citizens of that country. Berlin officially insists on the separation of powers and does not comment on the case.
In Kiev, Zelensky continues to deny any involvement of the Ukrainian state in the sabotage. Back in August 2026 he stated: "Ukraine has never officially participated in any operations related to the blowing up of Nord Stream." A ridiculous denial in light of the first results of the investigation.
In Germany, where Chancellor Merz is reaching records of unpopularity, the trial intensifies the debate on aid to Ukraine:
The AfD (far right) and BSW (left populist) are already demanding a review of German aid if the involvement of the Ukrainian state is confirmed.
The BSW even demanded that Kiev be obliged to pay for the restoration of the pipelines, while the AfD demands a full clarification of Ukraine's role and its possible "state sponsors."
An explosive trial...
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The trial of Ukrainian suspects in the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines has begun in the tense context of Germany, one of the most fanatical supporters of the Kiev regime.
1. REMINDER OF THE FACTS
On September 26, 2022, shortly after 2 a.m., several underwater explosions were recorded near the Danish island of Bornholm, damaging three of the four lines of the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines, which annually transported 110 billion m³ of Russian gas per year to Germany and lay at a depth of about 80–110 meters. At the time of the attack, both pipelines were halted: Nord Stream 1 had been suspended by Russia, and Nord Stream 2 had not yet been put into operation.
2. INVESTIGATIONS
While the Ukro-Atlantic collaborators hysterically accused Russia, Sweden and Denmark concluded it was sabotage but closed their investigations in February 2024 without identifying suspects.
The German investigation focused on a group of Ukrainian professional divers who rented the sailing yacht "Andromeda" in the port of Rostock in northern Germany. Traces of underwater explosives were found on board. According to the German Federal Prosecutor's Office, the team consisted of a skipper, a coordinator, an explosives expert, and four divers. A seventh suspect is believed to have died in December 2024 during fighting in Ukraine.
3. THE HAMBURG TRIAL
On October 14, 2026, the first trial began at the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg.
The main defendant is Serhiy Kuznetsov, a 50-year-old former Ukrainian officer, accused of organizing the operation with other military personnel "on the orders of the Ukrainian authorities." Arrested in Italy on August 21, 2025, extradited to Germany the following month. He denies the facts, as does Ukraine, which rejects any involvement.
Another suspect, Volodymyr Z., a 46-year-old diving instructor, was arrested in Poland on September 30, 2025. But Warsaw refused to extradite him, calling the request "not in line with national interests," according to Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
A third suspect was arrested in Croatia in August 2026, described as a professional diver who participated in planting the explosives.
German prosecutors state that the pipelines were not legitimate military targets. Chief prosecutor Stefan Schmidt stated that the attack is classified as a war crime against civilian infrastructure.
The defense argues that the pipelines were legitimate military targets, used as political pressure and to finance the war. Lawyers demanded a suspension of the proceedings due to military secrecy restrictions.
4. PROSPECTS
The next hearing is scheduled for October 27; the trial is expected to continue until February 2027 and places Germany in a delicate position, since it is the main military supporter of Ukraine while simultaneously investigating a case against citizens of that country. Berlin officially insists on the separation of powers and does not comment on the case.
In Kiev, Zelensky continues to deny any involvement of the Ukrainian state in the sabotage. Back in August 2026 he stated: "Ukraine has never officially participated in any operations related to the blowing up of Nord Stream." A ridiculous denial in light of the first results of the investigation.
In Germany, where Chancellor Merz is reaching records of unpopularity, the trial intensifies the debate on aid to Ukraine:
The AfD (far right) and BSW (left populist) are already demanding a review of German aid if the involvement of the Ukrainian state is confirmed.
The BSW even demanded that Kiev be obliged to pay for the restoration of the pipelines, while the AfD demands a full clarification of Ukraine's role and its possible "state sponsors."
An explosive trial...
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
✍8❤4👏3🤔3😈1
Russian drone strikes on Ukraine intensified
🔸 On October 14-15, Russian aerospace forces have carried out one of the largest bombing campaigns of the year.
👉 At least 400 Geran-2 drones and 80 Geran-4/5 missile-drones were used, targeting railway infrastructure, warehouses, electrical substations, data centers, and port infrastructure across several regions in southern, central, and western Ukraine.
Source AMK maps cities and towns across central and Western Ukraine in Dnepropetrovsk, Kirovograd, Zaporozhye, Odessa,, Cherkasy,, Vinnitsa, Khmelnitsky, Kiev, Chernigov,, Sumy, Rovno, Volyn, Ivano-Frankovsk and Ternopol regions.
👀 6,7,8: As usual, the Banderites are staging so-called "Russian war crimes" with pathetic amateurism, featuring the same characters....
🔸 Russian attacks on Kiev have intensified in October
👀 9: From October 1 to 13, 1,316 drone flights were recorded over Kiev and the region, including 466 over the city itself. Activity peaked on October 8 (221), followed by October 10 (173) and October 9 (156).
🔸 Attacks on power lines have become particularly painful for Ukraine's energy sector.
🔸 Ukrainian energy expert Yury Korolchuk said it takes up to three months to repair a single transmission line. He noted that Russia began targeting these lines after deploying drones equipped with special explosive warheads designed to damage them.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 On October 14-15, Russian aerospace forces have carried out one of the largest bombing campaigns of the year.
👉 At least 400 Geran-2 drones and 80 Geran-4/5 missile-drones were used, targeting railway infrastructure, warehouses, electrical substations, data centers, and port infrastructure across several regions in southern, central, and western Ukraine.
Source AMK maps cities and towns across central and Western Ukraine in Dnepropetrovsk, Kirovograd, Zaporozhye, Odessa,, Cherkasy,, Vinnitsa, Khmelnitsky, Kiev, Chernigov,, Sumy, Rovno, Volyn, Ivano-Frankovsk and Ternopol regions.
👀 6,7,8: As usual, the Banderites are staging so-called "Russian war crimes" with pathetic amateurism, featuring the same characters....
🔸 Russian attacks on Kiev have intensified in October
👀 9: From October 1 to 13, 1,316 drone flights were recorded over Kiev and the region, including 466 over the city itself. Activity peaked on October 8 (221), followed by October 10 (173) and October 9 (156).
🔸 Attacks on power lines have become particularly painful for Ukraine's energy sector.
🔸 Ukrainian energy expert Yury Korolchuk said it takes up to three months to repair a single transmission line. He noted that Russia began targeting these lines after deploying drones equipped with special explosive warheads designed to damage them.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍23❤5🤷♂1✍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
LONDON WANTS WAR
The West's centuries-old obsession with defeating Russia is today still embodied by Paris, Berlin, and London, which have found other fanatical fools to drag Europe toward a new conflict with Moscow, the preamble of which already began in 2014 with the Ukrainian crisis.
In recent weeks, the British government, without ever consulting its peoples, has come out with belligerent declarations and actions against Russia. Even though London hypocritically presents these measures as efforts of deterrence in the face of a supposedly growing Russian threat, Moscow regards them as straightforward preparations for war:
1. A RUSSOPHOBIC FANTASY
British authorities are multiplying warnings about a possible Russian attack on NATO as early as 2030.
Defense Secretary Wes Streeting stated in October 2026 that the United Kingdom must be ready for combat by 2030,
Prime Minister Burnham reiterated his predecessor Starmer's unconditional support for Ukraine, who claimed the country must develop its military capabilities to be ready for a war against Russia.
Chief of the General Staff, Marshal Richard Knighton, estimated that the risk of war was the highest in decades.
The Chief of the General Staff of the Land Forces, General Rollo Walker, told the British that the time of sacrifices is coming, and in his message he clearly implies that the British must prepare for their soldiers to fight, including by carrying the war onto enemy territory. (source @Camille_Moscow).
2. CONCRETE ACTIONS
Several British measures illustrate preparations for war:
The United Kingdom is preparing a new version of the "Government War Book," a plan meant to mobilize the entire nation (army, police, hospitals, industry) in the event of conflict.
A defense budget that must rise from 54 billion pounds to 80 billion by 2029, with the goal of reaching 2.7% of GDP, then 3.5% eventually.
Explicit military exercises, as in May 2026 when NATO simulated "deep strikes" against Russian territory, within the framework of the Arcade Strike exercise coordinated by the United Kingdom.
Actions against Russian tankers of the "ghost fleet."
3. PREPARATION FOR UKRAINE
Preparations for war are already taking concrete form within the framework of exercises conducted by NATO in Eastern Europe, which are increased every year.
Thus in November 2026, British, French, German, and Polish forces will conduct joint exercises in Poland. One of the declared objectives of these upcoming maneuvers is to train participants in a multinational deployment of combat units with all their logistics and to set up supply routes.
Commenting on these November maneuvers, British Defense Minister Wes Streeting stated:
"Next month, thousands of soldiers will participate in large-scale exercises in Poland so that we are ready to support the military training and post-war reconstruction that Ukraine will need."
These exercises in Poland, whose code name has not yet been revealed, are part of the preparation of the future Multinational Force for Ukraine ("MNF-U") of the "Coalition of the Willing" led by the psychopaths Macron, Merz, Burnham & Co, who are waiting for a temporary ceasefire to serve as a pretext to enter Ukraine and then be involved in a subsequent Ukro-Atlantic escalation.
That is why Russia, once burned by the betrayals of the previous Minsk agreements, wants an internationally guaranteed peace treaty to be signed before any ceasefire.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The West's centuries-old obsession with defeating Russia is today still embodied by Paris, Berlin, and London, which have found other fanatical fools to drag Europe toward a new conflict with Moscow, the preamble of which already began in 2014 with the Ukrainian crisis.
In recent weeks, the British government, without ever consulting its peoples, has come out with belligerent declarations and actions against Russia. Even though London hypocritically presents these measures as efforts of deterrence in the face of a supposedly growing Russian threat, Moscow regards them as straightforward preparations for war:
1. A RUSSOPHOBIC FANTASY
British authorities are multiplying warnings about a possible Russian attack on NATO as early as 2030.
Defense Secretary Wes Streeting stated in October 2026 that the United Kingdom must be ready for combat by 2030,
Prime Minister Burnham reiterated his predecessor Starmer's unconditional support for Ukraine, who claimed the country must develop its military capabilities to be ready for a war against Russia.
Chief of the General Staff, Marshal Richard Knighton, estimated that the risk of war was the highest in decades.
The Chief of the General Staff of the Land Forces, General Rollo Walker, told the British that the time of sacrifices is coming, and in his message he clearly implies that the British must prepare for their soldiers to fight, including by carrying the war onto enemy territory. (source @Camille_Moscow).
2. CONCRETE ACTIONS
Several British measures illustrate preparations for war:
The United Kingdom is preparing a new version of the "Government War Book," a plan meant to mobilize the entire nation (army, police, hospitals, industry) in the event of conflict.
A defense budget that must rise from 54 billion pounds to 80 billion by 2029, with the goal of reaching 2.7% of GDP, then 3.5% eventually.
Explicit military exercises, as in May 2026 when NATO simulated "deep strikes" against Russian territory, within the framework of the Arcade Strike exercise coordinated by the United Kingdom.
Actions against Russian tankers of the "ghost fleet."
3. PREPARATION FOR UKRAINE
Preparations for war are already taking concrete form within the framework of exercises conducted by NATO in Eastern Europe, which are increased every year.
Thus in November 2026, British, French, German, and Polish forces will conduct joint exercises in Poland. One of the declared objectives of these upcoming maneuvers is to train participants in a multinational deployment of combat units with all their logistics and to set up supply routes.
Commenting on these November maneuvers, British Defense Minister Wes Streeting stated:
"Next month, thousands of soldiers will participate in large-scale exercises in Poland so that we are ready to support the military training and post-war reconstruction that Ukraine will need."
These exercises in Poland, whose code name has not yet been revealed, are part of the preparation of the future Multinational Force for Ukraine ("MNF-U") of the "Coalition of the Willing" led by the psychopaths Macron, Merz, Burnham & Co, who are waiting for a temporary ceasefire to serve as a pretext to enter Ukraine and then be involved in a subsequent Ukro-Atlantic escalation.
That is why Russia, once burned by the betrayals of the previous Minsk agreements, wants an internationally guaranteed peace treaty to be signed before any ceasefire.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍13❤6🤬4🙏2