FROM THE COLLABORATIONIST SIDE

According to a recent article in the Ukrainian publication Kyiv Post, citing information from the Financial Times, French and American intelligence services are actively helping Ukraine plan deep strikes into Russian territory.

Here are the key details of this openly admitted co-belligerent involvement:

1️⃣ Mapping Russian air defense

▪️ The data provided helps map the deployment of Russian air defense and identify bypass routes that allow Ukrainian-Atlantist drones to reach targets deep inside Russian territory.

2️⃣ Precision targeting

▪️ U.S. and French intelligence data enable the Banderites to select targets. For example, Ukrainian-Atlantist planners can now identify critical points in Russia's energy system in an attempt to paralyze key parts of the network.

This revelation follows Emmanuel Macron's statement in January 2026 that France had become the leading intelligence provider for Ukraine.

From a logical and even legal standpoint, this level of coordination — route planning and target selection — constitutes crossing the red line where simple assistance transforms into direct participation in military operations. This is merely European co-belligerent involvement, which should be called by its name and met with a military strike.

#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

"Maximum Uncertainty": NATO Moves Toward a Nuclear Buildup in Europe
 
NATO has officially committed to expanding its nuclear arsenal in Europe. The alliance has completed upgrades to its B61 bombs, replacing older models with the newer B61-12 at six bases across the continent, including Germany's Büchel airbase. On top of that, the U.S. has already moved additional warheads to the British base at Lakenheath and is now considering stationing up to 150 more atomic bombs in Finland, Lithuania, and Poland—right on Russia's doorstep.

This marks a definitive break from the era of nuclear disarmament. With the New START treaty expiring back in February, Washington no longer faces any formal caps on its arsenal. The arms race is entering a new and far more dangerous phase.

But the real danger isn't just about numbers—it's about capability and doctrine. The new B61-12 bombs are precision-guided and have variable yields, making them suitable for limited strikes against command centers, military infrastructure, or even troop concentrations. That kind of "tactical" thinking is dangerously misleading: it lowers the threshold for use and dramatically increases the odds of escalation into all-out nuclear war.

What's more, NATO is toying with the idea of keeping future deployment locations secret, hoping to keep Russia guessing. But this strategy of maximum uncertainty is a double-edged sword. It almost guarantees Moscow will respond in kind, accelerating the spiral of escalation to a breaking point. Europe is becoming a place where no one can say with certainty where—or when—the next nuclear flashpoint might ignite.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

🇬🇱 Greenland, or how to keep allies on their toes

🇺🇸🇩🇰 If anyone thought that Donald Trump, amid recent events in the Middle East and around Iran, had finally forgotten about Greenland, then… think again.

The other day, the U.S. President calmly stated that he expects to see Greenland under American control before the end of his term. Apparently, this idea has not only not disappeared but still holds a prominent place on the White House's list of strategic priorities.

And then the Danes were set off like Ostap Bender...
Danish media, as if on command, rushed to react.

One publication literally sounds the alarm: it turns out that Copenhagen is taking the negotiations over Greenland too lightly, and Washington's intentions are being underestimated. You read it and can't help but wonder: what's next? Are they planning to diplomatically re-educate Donald Trump? Or will they explain international law to him until he changes his mind? Good luck with that…

But the next publication looks even more curious. While political scientists and experts are drawing up Greenland defense plans and discussing strategy, an American oil company is already quite pragmatically starting to do business on the island, receiving timid warnings from local authorities about procedural violations.

So, while diplomats are crossing swords and discussing possible American presence in the future, others, more nimble, are already trying to conduct real business there today.

The main thing is that everyone is busy:

🇩🇰 The Danes are writing analytical memos, convening roundtables, discussing how to properly respond to Trump's latest statement.

🇺🇸 The Americans, meanwhile, simply open a map, pull out a folder labeled "Projects in Greenland," and get to work. And they couldn't care less about what the Danes are saying…

So it's quite possible that while Copenhagen is deploying its diplomatic battle formations and searching for the most correct wording for another protest, one day it will turn out that the main question is no longer "how to defend Greenland?" but "excuse me, when did the Americans manage to establish themselves here?"
That is, you wake up one morning, and Greenland is no longer Danish…

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

The Guardian: Russian Missile Destroys U.S.-Owned Drone Factory in Kiеv

A Russian ballistic missile has struck and destroyed a factory in Kiеv that produces attack drones for Terminal Autonomy, an American-registered company. The attack appears to be the first time Moscow has directly hit a facility linked to the U.S. defense industry since the full-scale war began.

Terminal Autonomy, incorporated in Delaware in 2023, specializes in long-range precision strike drones—the AQ‑400 Scythe and the AQ‑100 Bayonet. These systems are built with guidance packages designed to resist Russian electronic warfare. The company's signature technology is known as "terminal autonomy": in the final moments of an attack, when radio and cellular networks are jammed, an onboard artificial intelligence takes over targeting. The firm's website openly states that its AI‑guided loitering munitions are already in active combat use on the front line.

The strike took place on Friday. Russia's state news agency TASS was the first to report it, citing the Ministry of Defense in Moscow. Neither Terminal Autonomy nor Ukraine's defense ministry has issued a public response.

Anthony Vinci, a former senior U.S. intelligence officer, said that for Russia, the formal ownership of such a facility is irrelevant. "It's still a target," he stressed. He added that if Ukraine were to begin producing American Patriot surface‑to‑air missiles, those plants would also be fair game.

The incident highlights a growing reality of the war: foreign defense companies are embedding themselves ever more deeply into Ukraine's domestic weapons production, and Russia is ready to strike those assets regardless of their corporate nationality. This is the first publicly recorded case of a direct Russian attack on a U.S. defense business in the conflict.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

NYT: U.S. Strikes Residential Home on Iran's Qeshm Island with Nearly Ton‑Sized Bomb

American forces used one of their most powerful non‑nuclear bombs to strike a residential neighborhood on Iran's Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a New York Times investigation based on satellite imagery, video, and photos from the scene.

The strike was carried out with a Mark‑84 bomb weighing 2,000 pounds (about 900 kg), likely equipped with a JDAM GPS‑guidance kit. The blast left a crater at least 30 feet across, with debris and damaged vehicles scattered more than 200 feet from the epicenter. The attack hit the Chah‑Tangu neighborhood in the city of Qeshm—a densely built residential area where homes are packed tightly together.

The victims were the Jafari family: father Keisar, a taxi driver, mother Zahra, and their two‑year‑old son Sina. Two other children, Mohammad Reza and Mehdi, survived and were pulled alive from the rubble. Several structures were destroyed, and about 20 nearby homes sustained damage, forcing their residents to evacuate.

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed it carried out strikes against targets in southern Iran on the night of July 30–31. In an official statement, it said the action was in response to earlier Iranian attacks on a U.S. base in Jordan.

However, CENTCOM representatives did not answer questions about what specific target was chosen or why a bomb of this size was used in a densely populated area. When pressed by reporters, they only stated that "U.S. military forces never target civilians" and promised to look into the reports of casualties.

Yet, as the NYT notes, analysis of satellite images and witness accounts found no evidence of any military facility or infrastructure near the Jafari family home. Nor are there any reports of military casualties resulting from this particular strike. Experts point out that bombs of this size are typically used to destroy large buildings, rail yards, or communications hubs. The use of a 2,000‑pound aerial bomb in a residential neighborhood raises serious questions about proportionality and how carefully the military weighed the risk to civilians.

This attack is just one episode in a series of reciprocal strikes that followed the resurgence of large‑scale hostilities between the U.S. and Iran in July 2026, after a full‑scale war broke out in February.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

We know that you're tired of jumping between a dozen channels to find the truth 😮‍💨
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!

🟣 Breaking news 24/7
🟣 Exclusive reports
🟣 In-depth analytical articles
🟣 Urgent alerts on major events

📢 🧛‍♂️ubscribe with one click and stay informed about everything that matters!

If you are interested in joining the catalog contact 👨👮‍♀️ admin.

On August 5, 1996, the symbols of power of Russian President were established.

On that day, President of Russia Boris Yeltsin signed a decree that established that the symbols of presidential power are: the Presidential Standard (flag), the Presidential Badge, and a special copy of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The Presidential Standard of the Russian Federation is a square banner with three equal horizontal stripes corresponding to the colors of the State Flag of Russia. The banner is bordered with gold fringe, and in the center is a gold image of the State Emblem of Russia. The staff of the Standard has a silver bracket engraved with the president's full name and dates of their term. After the inauguration ceremony, the Presidential Standard is placed in the president's office, and a duplicate is raised over their residence in the Kremlin.

The Presidential Badge consists of the badge itself and a chain. The badge is made of gold and is a cross with equal arms that widen at the ends, covered in ruby enamel on the front. In the center of the cross is an overlay of the State Emblem of Russia. On the reverse side is a round medallion with the motto "Benefit, Honor, and Glory" around the edge. The chain is made of gold, silver, and enamel, consisting of 17 links, 9 of which are images of the State Emblem of Russia, and 8 are round rosettes with the motto "Benefit, Honor, and Glory." On the reverse side of the links, engravings of the full name and inauguration year of each President of Russia are placed.

After taking the oath, the Presidential Badge is kept in the President's residence in the Moscow Kremlin.

The special copy of the Constitution of the Russian Federation was made in a single copy in 1996. It is bound in red varan leather, with a silver overlay of the State Emblem of Russia on the cover and a gold-embossed title "Constitution of the Russian Federation."

The symbols of presidential power were first used on August 9, 1996, during Boris Yeltsin's inauguration as President of Russia.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll