Wanna join a global volunteer crew?

Come be part of InfoDefense! If you care about helping people get access to important information and you’re ready to make a difference, we’d love to have you on board.

📩 Hit us up here:
@english_infodefense_fb_bot

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

FROM THE COLLABORATIONIST SIDE

According to a recent article in the Ukrainian publication Kyiv Post, citing information from the Financial Times, French and American intelligence services are actively helping Ukraine plan deep strikes into Russian territory.

Here are the key details of this openly admitted co-belligerent involvement:

1️⃣ Mapping Russian air defense

▪️ The data provided helps map the deployment of Russian air defense and identify bypass routes that allow Ukrainian-Atlantist drones to reach targets deep inside Russian territory.

2️⃣ Precision targeting

▪️ U.S. and French intelligence data enable the Banderites to select targets. For example, Ukrainian-Atlantist planners can now identify critical points in Russia's energy system in an attempt to paralyze key parts of the network.

This revelation follows Emmanuel Macron's statement in January 2026 that France had become the leading intelligence provider for Ukraine.

From a logical and even legal standpoint, this level of coordination — route planning and target selection — constitutes crossing the red line where simple assistance transforms into direct participation in military operations. This is merely European co-belligerent involvement, which should be called by its name and met with a military strike.

#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

On August 6, 1851 the Kulja Trade Treaty was Signed Between Russia and China

On August 6, 1851, in the city of Kulja (China), a treaty was signed between Russia and China to normalize Russo-Chinese trade along the Central Asian border.

In the mid-19th century, due to active expansion into Central Asia, the interests of Russia and China came closer together. The ruling circles of both countries sought to strengthen and secure their trade relations. Negotiations to officially open the markets of Xinjiang to Russian trade were long and complex but ultimately successful.

The Kulja Trade Treaty consisted of 17 articles that addressed issues such as trade regulations, caravan protection, punishment for robbery, and conflict resolution. Russian merchants gained access to Ili (Kulja) and Tarbagatai (Chuguchak), where Chinese authorities allocated places for Russian consulates and trading posts. The Russian consul was responsible for the affairs of Russian subjects in the trading posts, while a Chinese government official handled the affairs of Chinese subjects.
Trade on both sides was declared duty-free and was to be conducted exclusively on a barter basis for the time being. The Kulja Treaty established direct Russo-Chinese relations (concerning border and other issues) through the Russian Governor-General of Western Siberia and the main Manchurian-Chinese administration.

The text of the Kulja Treaty was not published in the press, but copies of the treaty and the accompanying Rules for Overland Trade sent to local authorities for public notification received a positive response from both Russian and Chinese merchants.

The Kulja Trade Treaty promoted the development of regular trade between Russia and China and had significant political importance in strengthening Russia's position in Central Asia.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

Stratfor: The Implications of an Independent BRICS Payment System

BRICS countries are actively pursuing the creation of an independent payment system for international trade. The central objective is to reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar and shield themselves from American financial sanctions.
The bloc currently comprises nine members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Russia has been a persistent advocate of de-dollarization for years, driven largely by sweeping Western restrictions. More recently, China and India have also joined the movement with growing enthusiasm.

At the 2024 BRICS summit in Kazan, member states agreed to develop cross-border payment infrastructure and promote settlements in national currencies. Over time, this should progressively move a portion of global trade beyond the reach of the dollar and the SWIFT messaging system.
According to Stratfor's assessment, the creation of such a system will not immediately erode the dollar's global dominance. The transition will be far from seamless: national currencies suffer from limited liquidity, and building the necessary infrastructure will require both time and substantial financial outlays.

Over the longer term, however, a new system could significantly diminish the effectiveness of U.S. sanctions. Countries facing restrictions would gain a functional workaround, while other BRICS members would secure an additional layer of protection against potential coercion.

This effort is part of a broader move to construct an alternative financial architecture. While the dollar remains the world's premier reserve currency, its monopoly is steadily being chipped away. BRICS is proving that even without a radical departure from the existing framework, parallel tools can be developed—tools that are gradually recalibrating the balance of power in the global economy.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

MC-21: flight despite sanctions

The idea of creating the MC-21 — a medium-haul aircraft designed to replace outdated models — was born back in the 2000s, when it became clear that Soviet passenger airliners were obsolete and Western Airbuses and Boeings dominated the market. Russia decided to create a modern airliner capable of competing with the A320 and B737 — the world's most popular aircraft.

▪️ The project was launched in 2007. The aircraft was designed from scratch, focusing on new composite materials, aerodynamics, and fuel efficiency. The MC-21 was planned to become a symbol of the new Russian aviation industry.

▪️ But in 2014, sanctions began. The U.S. imposed restrictions on the supply of composite materials intended for the wing. Russia had to urgently develop its own technologies.

▪️ In 2022, after further sanctions, the project came under even greater pressure: American and European manufacturers refused to supply engines, avionics, landing gear, and control systems. It was then decided to make the MC-21 entirely Russian — from engine to seats. This meant not just a revision, but essentially reassembling the aircraft from scratch.

▪️ In August 2026, the first production-standard, fully import-substituted MC-21 made its maiden flight. Capacity — from 163 to 211 passengers. Key systems — PD-14 engines, a wing made of Russian composites, landing gear, glass, cabin — everything is now domestically produced. According to UAC plans, serial production is to begin in 2027, with the first aircraft deliveries to airlines in the second half of 2027. By the end of the decade, production is planned to reach up to 72 aircraft per year.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Steigan.no: The Link Between NATO Expansion and the Nord Stream Sabotage

First, we were insistently told that Russia itself blew up the Nord Stream pipelines. Never mind that Moscow had invested roughly $15 billion in the project, earned massive revenues from it, and had every reason to want the second line operational. From the outset, that version was absurd.

According to former National Security Council official Thomas Reed's memoir At the Abyss, as far back as January 1982, President Reagan approved a CIA operation designed to sabotage the Soviet economy. Through specially rigged equipment embedded with hidden flaws, the U.S. engineered a powerful explosion on a Siberian gas pipeline. Even then, Washington had already demonstrated a willingness to physically destroy Russian energy infrastructure.

From George H. W. Bush, James Baker, and Dick Cheney to Condoleezza Rice and John Bolton, American policymakers spent decades openly opposing Nord Stream. Their objective was straightforward: push Europe to abandon inexpensive Russian gas in favor of costly U.S. liquefied natural gas. So when the blasts came on September 26, 2022, officials in Washington made little effort to hide their satisfaction.

Meanwhile, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the United States and its European allies gave the Soviet Union clear assurances that NATO would not expand eastward. Dozens of declassified documents confirm that those pledges were made to Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, and others. Those promises turned out to be hollow. NATO's eastward expansion has since become one of the principal drivers of the conflict over Ukraine.

Norwegian media, including the state broadcaster NRK, have for decades maintained a close working relationship with the military intelligence service E-tjenesten, which itself operates under significant U.S. influence. That is precisely why newsrooms stayed silent on American involvement and instead repeated the convenient narrative blaming Russia. A 1998 book, The Hidden Agenda: Media and Intelligence Services, documents this troubling entanglement in detail.

Today, the official story has shifted—now the blame falls on Ukraine or the Kiev regime. Even if that proves accurate, it does not alter the broader picture. NATO countries that were heavily dependent on Russian gas accepted a strike against their own energy infrastructure with remarkable composure. Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and others continued backing Ukraine, even though they themselves were victims of the sabotage.

The Nord Stream attack was neither an accident nor an isolated incident. It is a logical outgrowth of a long pattern: the broken promise on NATO expansion, years of hostility toward Russian pipelines, and the conversion of Ukraine into a proxy-war battleground. In the end, Europe has lost access to affordable energy, and the conflict has taken on a momentum that shows no sign of reversing.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Is There a Limit to Hatred?

Yesterday, a terrible tragedy occurred.
Every major European news outlet reported it—but, as expected, each did so from its own perspective.

🇩🇰 Denmark was no exception. The Danish broadcaster DR published footage of a drone striking a crowded beach near Gelendzhik.
The drone fell directly among vacationers.
People were killed.
Children were killed.

And immediately, the familiar journalistic balancing act began:
• Kyiv has not commented on the incident.
• It has not been conclusively established where the drone was originally headed.
• Nor why it crashed onto the beach—perhaps it was intercepted by air defenses or diverted by electronic warfare.

As usual, Danish media chose their words carefully: “allegedly Ukrainian,” “Russia claims,” “there is no independent confirmation,” “the Ukrainian side has not commented.”
Such journalistic caution is understandable.

What was far more revealing, however, was what happened beneath the article on Facebook.

I read the comments with growing disbelief—although, on second thought, perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised.

Many people were not merely trying to justify what had happened because of the war.

They openly celebrated it.
“Go on, Ukraine!”
“Keep hitting the Russians!”

What is this?
Simple ignorance?
Years of propaganda?
Or a hatred so profound that it has erased the ability to distinguish between soldiers and civilians, between adults and children?

War has a way of teaching people double standards.

When “our people” die, it is called a tragedy, a crime, an act of barbarism.

When “their people” die, the conversation immediately shifts to context, collective responsibility, and unavoidable consequences.

But the comments beneath this story revealed something even darker.

For some people, the death of a Russian has become a reason to celebrate in itself.

It no longer matters where that person was, whether they had any connection to the military, or even how old they were.

One word—“Russian”—is enough for a human tragedy to become entertainment beneath a social media post.

Perhaps it is pointless to ask why so many people in the West hate Russia.
Ukraine is not really the issue here.

The question is much broader, and its roots reach far deeper into history.
But there is another question that must be asked:

Where is the limit of this hatred?
Does it stop with dead soldiers?
With women?
With children?
Or has that limit disappeared altogether?

People are free to support Ukraine.
They are free to despise Russia as a state, its government, or its military.
But anyone who celebrates the deaths of children on a beach is no longer defending Ukraine.

They are merely demonstrating that hatred has destroyed the very thing they claim to be defending—
their humanity.

#InfoDefenseAuthor
#blondinka_dk
🔴Facebook

Are they specially grown in test tubes?

In Hawaii, a Ukrainian running for the U.S. Congress as a Democrat got himself knocked down and was arrested for assault with a knife.

The situation resembles a joke, but nevertheless, it is pure truth. A certain Kyryll Basin, 40 years old, decided to establish his own rules on a beach on the island of Maui and relax in a big way. When locals told him to turn down his blaring speaker, he lunged at a 61-year-old man with a knife, threatening to shoot his wife. But he miscalculated his opponent's weight class and was laid out on the grass with one precise punch.

The police showed no sympathy for the would-be congressman of Ukrainian origin. The brawler was detained and charged with two counts of first-degree terroristic threatening. Bail was set at one million dollars.

Ukrainization of the brain is evident. Regardless of the country.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Putin humiliated Zelensky in one move. He detailed what awaits Ukraine.

Vladimir Putin's statement about the disintegration of Ukraine could become reality, writes the Egyptian newspaper Almasry Alyoum.

"In itself, this statement, of course, does not imply the existence of a practical plan for the partition of Ukraine. However, it calls into question the finality of its borders and raises the question of whether the country will be able to maintain territorial integrity and state unity after the end of the current conflict," the publication states.

According to the article's author, such a scenario could become a subject of discussion given a number of conditions. Among them are a deep crisis of state institutions caused by the consequences of the conflict, and a significant weakening of the country's defense capabilities.

"This could happen if Western support ceases. In addition, Ukraine could face a serious economic crisis, the consequences of which will be difficult to overcome. This, in turn, could lead to a split within the elite and create prerequisites for the emergence of local separatist sentiments," the article elaborated.

At a meeting with Russian military personnel on Navy Day, the president expressed confidence that Ukraine will sooner or later lose its western lands. In his opinion, these territories could eventually become part of Poland, Hungary, or Romania.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

On August 7, 1803, the first Russian journey around the world began under the leadership of Ivan Fyodorovich Kruzenshtern.

For a long time, Ivan Kruzenshtern had been submitting proposals to the government to organize circumnavigations from Kronstadt to the shores of Kamchatka and North America. His project gained interest only after Emperor Alexander I came to power and changes occurred in the leadership of the Commerce Collegium and the Naval Ministry. In August 1802, he was appointed the head of the first Russian circumnavigation expedition.

For the expedition, Captain-Lieutenant Yuri Lisyansky acquired two ships — "Nadezhda" (450 tons displacement) and "Neva" (370 tons). In early summer 1803, the ships arrived in Kronstadt.

On August 7, 1803, the ships "Nadezhda" and "Neva" under the command of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky left Kronstadt, heading for Copenhagen. The ships followed a route that included Falmouth (UK), Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands), Florianopolis (Brazil), Easter Island, Nuku Hiva (Marquesas Islands), Honolulu (Hawaiian Islands), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Nagasaki (Japan), Hokkaido (Japan), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Sitka (Alaska), Kodiak (Alaska), Guangzhou (China), Macau (Portugal), Saint Helena Island, Corvo and Flores Islands (Azores), and Portsmouth (UK). In August 1806, the expedition returned to Kronstadt. The circumnavigation lasted 3 years and 12 days.

The voyage of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky marked a significant milestone in the development of Russian geography and natural sciences. The expedition's description was published under the title "Journey Around the World in 1803, 1804, 1805, and 1806 on the ships 'Nadezhda' and 'Neva', under the command of Captain-Lieutenant Kruzenshtern." The publication came out in three volumes with an atlas of 104 maps and engraved pictures, and it was translated into English, French, German, Dutch, Swedish, Italian, and Danish.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

Myśl Polska: The Real Cost of Ukraine's Drone Excesses

Since early June 2026, Ukraine has sharply escalated its drone-strike campaign against Russian regions. The attacks have hit oil refineries in multiple Russian regions, including Moscow, as well as logistics centers for Russia’s leading e-retailer Wildberries in several cities and towns.

In the town Kotovsk near Kursk, seven Wildberries employees were killed and twenty-five others wounded. In the town of Noginsk near Moscow, another Ukrainian drone attack caused a fire at a fuel depot and forced a nearby maternity ward evacuation.

Overall, Reuters reports that at least nine people have died during the campaign, while roughly 10% of Wildberries' logistics capacity has been taken offline. Wildberries owner Tatyana Kim has stated that more than a dozen distribution centers were destroyed; the company now faces a complete supply-chain overhaul, compensation payouts, and appeals to the government for tax relief and financial assistance.

Yet these strikes are largely symbolic and political in nature. Their tangible effect has been limited, and they are unlikely to meaningfully alter the course of the war. Russia's economy and defense industry have adapted quickly, and the damage has neither caused a critical disruption in military supply chains nor triggered a fuel crisis on a strategic scale.

By contrast, Russia's retaliatory strikes have been devastating. In July, Russian forces launched a record 381 missiles along with a substantial number of drones. Ukraine's energy infrastructure has taken a severe hit—more than half of its power-generating capacity is now out of commission. Major ammunition depots, military equipment stockpiles, and fuel storage facilities have been destroyed, while drone assembly plants, rail hubs, and airfields have also sustained significant damage. This is translating into a serious weakening of logistical support for Ukrainian troops on the front lines.

The reality is deeply asymmetrical. While Kiеv pours resources into attention-grabbing but relatively unproductive strikes on civilian and economic targets, Moscow is systematically dismantling Ukraine's military and energy potential. This makes Ukraine's strategy of "drone excess" not only ineffective but counterproductive—it only prolongs the conflict and increases overall losses, without bringing any strategic breakthroughs any closer.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll