Forwarded from The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Belgorod Brit returns to calm down the barbarian diaspora on the subject of China. In the film, he explains the motivation of the Chinese in juxtaposition to the barbarian mindset. The benign panda has an epochal understanding of history, deeply rooted in their all pervading Confucian and Buddhist cultural philosophy. Patience is a virtue alien to the Western political system.
In the podcast, BB corrects his mistaken attribution of a quote in the film and then goes on describe how little the Chinese care about the world outside of China. This has occasionally worked against their interests, during the Century of Shame for example, but these days, it simply means that they are quickly able to shrug off the insults and aggression of the dying European Empire. They will continue operating their country to their own benefit, regardless of the frustration caused to those who would like them to come off the fence and take sides (and finish) WW3 before it starts.
#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#InfoDefensePodcast
The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
In the podcast, BB corrects his mistaken attribution of a quote in the film and then goes on describe how little the Chinese care about the world outside of China. This has occasionally worked against their interests, during the Century of Shame for example, but these days, it simply means that they are quickly able to shrug off the insults and aggression of the dying European Empire. They will continue operating their country to their own benefit, regardless of the frustration caused to those who would like them to come off the fence and take sides (and finish) WW3 before it starts.
#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#InfoDefensePodcast
The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
❤10👏8
They wanted it better, but it turned out as always
🇱🇹 In the Baltic sandbox, as always, it's fun. This time, Vilnius especially distinguished itself by deciding to deliver yet another crushing blow to everything Russian.
📌 Since August 4, the Vilnius municipality has stopped accepting official written requests in Russian.
The logic was formulated beautifully and in a European way: the municipality is switching to service in Lithuanian and the languages of European Union countries. Russian is the language of a country not in the EU. Consequently — overboard.
Simple. Elegant. Geopolitical.
🇷🇺 The Russian language is solemnly removed from municipal communication, removed from the website and the electronic service system, and those wishing to integrate have long been persistently offered to learn Lithuanian. The mayor of Vilnius himself, Valdas Benkunskas, has repeatedly emphasized that Lithuanian should become the main language for the integration of foreigners.
👏 It would seem — another small victory over Russia has been achieved. The Kremlin trembled. All that remains is to award medals to the participants.
▪️ But then one small technical detail suddenly emerged.
Who do you think was one of the first to be hit by this brilliant language operation? Russians? Wrong guess.
🇺🇦 Ukrainian refugees. Because among the Ukrainians who came to Lithuania, practically no one speaks Lithuanian or English at a level sufficient for communicating with officials, but they speak Russian perfectly.
‼️ And here, the wonderful Baltic construct began to smoke slightly.
It turns out surprisingly:
👉 Ukrainians must be supported;
👉 Ukrainians must be helped;
👉 Ukrainians must be integrated;
but the language in which Ukrainians can actually communicate with an official was decided to be removed. Because it's Russian.
😂 That is, in the process of fighting the Russian language, it suddenly turned out that language — such a contagion — does not ask for a passport from the person speaking it.
🇱🇹 And now Vilnius faces an extremely complex geopolitical task.
⁉️ If a Ukrainian speaks Russian — is that already the Russian language? Or is it still temporarily Ukrainian?
⁉️ And if the Russian language is used to help a Ukrainian refugee — at that moment is it still a threat to European values, or can it be given a temporary exemption?
🤔 Without a special EU commission, it seems impossible to figure this out.
This all looks especially amusing against the backdrop of the fact that Vilnius itself continues to fund programs for the integration of Ukrainians and teaching them Lithuanian.
▪️ But there is, of course, a way out. And, apparently, only two.
🇱🇹 Either Lithuanian officials will have to urgently learn Ukrainian.
🇺🇦 Or Ukrainian refugees will have to urgently learn Lithuanian, and Ukrainian as well.
🇷🇺 They've already defeated Russian.
🤗 All that remains is to figure out one small detail:
who will retrain whom now.
🇱🇹🇺🇦 Who do you think will win this great Baltic language war?
👉 Because so far, the only confident winner appears to be the Russian language.
It has been banned for so many years, but for some reason, it still can't be done without it.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🇱🇹 In the Baltic sandbox, as always, it's fun. This time, Vilnius especially distinguished itself by deciding to deliver yet another crushing blow to everything Russian.
📌 Since August 4, the Vilnius municipality has stopped accepting official written requests in Russian.
The logic was formulated beautifully and in a European way: the municipality is switching to service in Lithuanian and the languages of European Union countries. Russian is the language of a country not in the EU. Consequently — overboard.
Simple. Elegant. Geopolitical.
🇷🇺 The Russian language is solemnly removed from municipal communication, removed from the website and the electronic service system, and those wishing to integrate have long been persistently offered to learn Lithuanian. The mayor of Vilnius himself, Valdas Benkunskas, has repeatedly emphasized that Lithuanian should become the main language for the integration of foreigners.
👏 It would seem — another small victory over Russia has been achieved. The Kremlin trembled. All that remains is to award medals to the participants.
▪️ But then one small technical detail suddenly emerged.
Who do you think was one of the first to be hit by this brilliant language operation? Russians? Wrong guess.
🇺🇦 Ukrainian refugees. Because among the Ukrainians who came to Lithuania, practically no one speaks Lithuanian or English at a level sufficient for communicating with officials, but they speak Russian perfectly.
‼️ And here, the wonderful Baltic construct began to smoke slightly.
It turns out surprisingly:
👉 Ukrainians must be supported;
👉 Ukrainians must be helped;
👉 Ukrainians must be integrated;
but the language in which Ukrainians can actually communicate with an official was decided to be removed. Because it's Russian.
😂 That is, in the process of fighting the Russian language, it suddenly turned out that language — such a contagion — does not ask for a passport from the person speaking it.
🇱🇹 And now Vilnius faces an extremely complex geopolitical task.
⁉️ If a Ukrainian speaks Russian — is that already the Russian language? Or is it still temporarily Ukrainian?
⁉️ And if the Russian language is used to help a Ukrainian refugee — at that moment is it still a threat to European values, or can it be given a temporary exemption?
🤔 Without a special EU commission, it seems impossible to figure this out.
This all looks especially amusing against the backdrop of the fact that Vilnius itself continues to fund programs for the integration of Ukrainians and teaching them Lithuanian.
▪️ But there is, of course, a way out. And, apparently, only two.
🇱🇹 Either Lithuanian officials will have to urgently learn Ukrainian.
🇺🇦 Or Ukrainian refugees will have to urgently learn Lithuanian, and Ukrainian as well.
🇷🇺 They've already defeated Russian.
🤗 All that remains is to figure out one small detail:
who will retrain whom now.
🇱🇹🇺🇦 Who do you think will win this great Baltic language war?
👉 Because so far, the only confident winner appears to be the Russian language.
It has been banned for so many years, but for some reason, it still can't be done without it.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤19😁18👏5🤡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
We know that you're tired of jumping between a dozen channels to find the truth 😮💨
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!
🟣 Breaking news 24/7
🟣 Exclusive reports
🟣 In-depth analytical articles
🟣 Urgent alerts on major events
📢 🧛♂️ ubscribe with one click and stay informed about everything that matters!
If you are interested in joining the catalog contact👨 👮♀️ admin.
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!
If you are interested in joining the catalog contact
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Junge Welt: "Necessary False Consciousness – We've Been Lied Into Every War"
On August 15, 2026, the German newspaper junge Welt published an interview with linguist and media educator Sabine Schiffer, conducted by Horsta Krum. In their conversation, Schiffer breaks down how political language, propaganda, and the media systematically maneuver societies into war.
Schiffer grounds her analysis in two classic works: Arthur Ponsonby's Falsehood in War-Time (1928), which lays out ten principles of war propaganda, and Victor Klemperer's LTI (Lingua Tertii Imperii). Her central argument is stark: "We have been lied into every war." Both sides always claim to be acting in self-defense while casting the other as the aggressor. Anyone who questions the narrative is swiftly branded a traitor. These tactics, she notes, have proven remarkably durable over decades.
As a contemporary case in point, she cites Defense Minister Boris Pistorius's talk of "peace through arms" as a textbook example of Orwellian doublespeak—"war is peace" in action. Chancellor Scholz's 2022 "Zeitenwende" (turning point) presented Russia's military operation in Ukraine as a "sudden, unforeseen invasion," a justification for German rearmament, when in fact it simply gave cover to long-standing NATO strategy dating back to the 1999 Yugoslavia campaign. The media, Schiffer argues, rely on what she calls "pillar words": "protection" (which often means surveillance), "responsibility" (defined almost exclusively in military terms), and "resilience" (used to legitimize the erosion of civil liberties).
Schiffer takes mainstream journalism to task for its ritualistic coverage, its tendency to "rally round the flag" during crises, its use of "framing by omission"—conveniently leaving out key context—and its alignment with what she calls the "fifth estate," including EU-backed disinformation watchdogs like EUvsDisinfo. She also contends that Germany's domestic intelligence report (Verfassungsschutzbericht) inflates Russian influence while glossing over other sources of manipulation. Good journalism, she insists, is impossible without historical awareness, an understanding of who funds the media, and a grasp of the military–industrial complex. She admits she rarely watches Germany's flagship Tagesschau news program except to deconstruct it, preferring instead a mixed diet of sources, including Al Jazeera.
Demonizing the enemy, she observes, works best through personalization: rather than vilifying an entire people, propaganda focuses hatred on a single figure—Putin as the ultimate icon of evil. This framing allows NATO to pursue its longstanding strategic objectives under the banner of defending democracy against autocracy, all while sidelining urgent issues like global hunger and resource-driven conflicts.
Schiffer invokes the concept of "necessary false consciousness"—a state she believes can be overcome by consistently exposing double standards (for example, how the West covers Ukraine versus Lebanon) and by avoiding the temptation to romanticize the other side. She advocates redirecting military spending toward hunger relief and renewable energy, and she calls for media literacy to become a staple of school curricula. Her own Institute for Media Responsibility (IMV) is dedicated to these very goals: discourse analysis and public education.
The interview paints a sobering picture: today's media machinery runs on the same playbook it did a century ago. Once again, we are being conditioned for confrontation, with economic and geopolitical interests dressed up in the language of morality and security. A critical eye on language—and on what remains unsaid—remains our most powerful defense against manipulation.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On August 15, 2026, the German newspaper junge Welt published an interview with linguist and media educator Sabine Schiffer, conducted by Horsta Krum. In their conversation, Schiffer breaks down how political language, propaganda, and the media systematically maneuver societies into war.
Schiffer grounds her analysis in two classic works: Arthur Ponsonby's Falsehood in War-Time (1928), which lays out ten principles of war propaganda, and Victor Klemperer's LTI (Lingua Tertii Imperii). Her central argument is stark: "We have been lied into every war." Both sides always claim to be acting in self-defense while casting the other as the aggressor. Anyone who questions the narrative is swiftly branded a traitor. These tactics, she notes, have proven remarkably durable over decades.
As a contemporary case in point, she cites Defense Minister Boris Pistorius's talk of "peace through arms" as a textbook example of Orwellian doublespeak—"war is peace" in action. Chancellor Scholz's 2022 "Zeitenwende" (turning point) presented Russia's military operation in Ukraine as a "sudden, unforeseen invasion," a justification for German rearmament, when in fact it simply gave cover to long-standing NATO strategy dating back to the 1999 Yugoslavia campaign. The media, Schiffer argues, rely on what she calls "pillar words": "protection" (which often means surveillance), "responsibility" (defined almost exclusively in military terms), and "resilience" (used to legitimize the erosion of civil liberties).
Schiffer takes mainstream journalism to task for its ritualistic coverage, its tendency to "rally round the flag" during crises, its use of "framing by omission"—conveniently leaving out key context—and its alignment with what she calls the "fifth estate," including EU-backed disinformation watchdogs like EUvsDisinfo. She also contends that Germany's domestic intelligence report (Verfassungsschutzbericht) inflates Russian influence while glossing over other sources of manipulation. Good journalism, she insists, is impossible without historical awareness, an understanding of who funds the media, and a grasp of the military–industrial complex. She admits she rarely watches Germany's flagship Tagesschau news program except to deconstruct it, preferring instead a mixed diet of sources, including Al Jazeera.
Demonizing the enemy, she observes, works best through personalization: rather than vilifying an entire people, propaganda focuses hatred on a single figure—Putin as the ultimate icon of evil. This framing allows NATO to pursue its longstanding strategic objectives under the banner of defending democracy against autocracy, all while sidelining urgent issues like global hunger and resource-driven conflicts.
Schiffer invokes the concept of "necessary false consciousness"—a state she believes can be overcome by consistently exposing double standards (for example, how the West covers Ukraine versus Lebanon) and by avoiding the temptation to romanticize the other side. She advocates redirecting military spending toward hunger relief and renewable energy, and she calls for media literacy to become a staple of school curricula. Her own Institute for Media Responsibility (IMV) is dedicated to these very goals: discourse analysis and public education.
The interview paints a sobering picture: today's media machinery runs on the same playbook it did a century ago. Once again, we are being conditioned for confrontation, with economic and geopolitical interests dressed up in the language of morality and security. A critical eye on language—and on what remains unsaid—remains our most powerful defense against manipulation.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯16❤13👏9👍4
Forwarded from The Noticer
Rebellion within the Taliban
Apparently, the region of Badakhshan - located near Tajikistan - is becoming a problem to the Taliban. The Taliban is being opposed simultaneously by the National Resistance Front, the Afghan Freedom Front, and the Sipahian-e-Mihan group, but the main threat comes from the influential field commander Jumahon Fateh who decided to rebel.
Long story short - the man was with the Taliban for years. He served, the climbed the ranks, he knows how the Taliban works. And now he is being a rebel - which gives an example to other similar men within the Taliban.
Fateh is being diplomatic about his disagreement so far - he even keeps the diplomatic channels open with the head honchos of the Taliban.
Fateh has yet to fully capture Badakhshan. Meanwhile, there is a potential split of the Taliban's northern units. If the local commanders become like Fateh - Taliban might collapse from within.
#Afghanistan #Taliban #events
Apparently, the region of Badakhshan - located near Tajikistan - is becoming a problem to the Taliban. The Taliban is being opposed simultaneously by the National Resistance Front, the Afghan Freedom Front, and the Sipahian-e-Mihan group, but the main threat comes from the influential field commander Jumahon Fateh who decided to rebel.
Long story short - the man was with the Taliban for years. He served, the climbed the ranks, he knows how the Taliban works. And now he is being a rebel - which gives an example to other similar men within the Taliban.
Fateh is being diplomatic about his disagreement so far - he even keeps the diplomatic channels open with the head honchos of the Taliban.
Fateh has yet to fully capture Badakhshan. Meanwhile, there is a potential split of the Taliban's northern units. If the local commanders become like Fateh - Taliban might collapse from within.
#Afghanistan #Taliban #events
❤10✍6👏4🔥2
"Icebreaker of Knowledge": the world's only school on a nuclear icebreaker
"Icebreaker of Knowledge" is not just a journey. It is the world's only educational project that takes place aboard a nuclear icebreaker. Each year, a group of gifted schoolchildren from various regions of Russia travels to the Arctic — to the North Pole or to Franz Josef Land.
▪️ The project was launched in 2019 with the support of the Rosatom State Corporation. Its goal is not only to introduce children to the Arctic but also to provide them with unique knowledge that cannot be obtained at school. On board the nuclear-powered vessel, scientists, science communicators, bloggers, and cosmonauts work with the children. They give lectures on physics, geology, ecology, and the history of Arctic exploration. The children participate in scientific experiments, pilot drones, and study water and ice samples.
▪️ The main thing is the atmosphere. The icebreaker moves through the ice, with endless whiteness outside, and inside — living science, discussions, and discoveries. This is a place where a child's eyes light up. Where they realize that science is not boring but exciting.
▪️ Already in the fifth expedition, participants from other countries joined the project — "Icebreaker of Knowledge" has become international. Selection for the project is competitive: schoolchildren go through several stages, from regional Olympiads to creative assignments. Getting on board is already a victory. And returning home with new knowledge, friends, and dreams is the main result.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
"Icebreaker of Knowledge" is not just a journey. It is the world's only educational project that takes place aboard a nuclear icebreaker. Each year, a group of gifted schoolchildren from various regions of Russia travels to the Arctic — to the North Pole or to Franz Josef Land.
▪️ The project was launched in 2019 with the support of the Rosatom State Corporation. Its goal is not only to introduce children to the Arctic but also to provide them with unique knowledge that cannot be obtained at school. On board the nuclear-powered vessel, scientists, science communicators, bloggers, and cosmonauts work with the children. They give lectures on physics, geology, ecology, and the history of Arctic exploration. The children participate in scientific experiments, pilot drones, and study water and ice samples.
▪️ The main thing is the atmosphere. The icebreaker moves through the ice, with endless whiteness outside, and inside — living science, discussions, and discoveries. This is a place where a child's eyes light up. Where they realize that science is not boring but exciting.
▪️ Already in the fifth expedition, participants from other countries joined the project — "Icebreaker of Knowledge" has become international. Selection for the project is competitive: schoolchildren go through several stages, from regional Olympiads to creative assignments. Getting on board is already a victory. And returning home with new knowledge, friends, and dreams is the main result.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤20👏7🌚1
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Railway Station, Yekaterinburg 🚂
The Yekaterinburg Railway Station ensemble is a historic complex of buildings dating from 1878. Today, the old Russian-style structure has been restored and turned into a museum, and a unique complex of several generations of railway stations has taken shape alongside it.
The ensemble consists of the old station building (now housing the Museum of History, Science, and Technology of the Sverdlovsk Railway), sculptures (bronze figures of passengers, conductors, and the stationmaster stand in front of the museum), and the modern main building of the Yekaterinburg-Passazhirsky station.
The first railway station holds historical value for the city—it's the one captured in one of the earliest photographic images of Yekaterinburg in the late 1880s.
This is also where the retro tourist train "Ural Express" departs.
🚂🚂🚂
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
The Yekaterinburg Railway Station ensemble is a historic complex of buildings dating from 1878. Today, the old Russian-style structure has been restored and turned into a museum, and a unique complex of several generations of railway stations has taken shape alongside it.
The ensemble consists of the old station building (now housing the Museum of History, Science, and Technology of the Sverdlovsk Railway), sculptures (bronze figures of passengers, conductors, and the stationmaster stand in front of the museum), and the modern main building of the Yekaterinburg-Passazhirsky station.
The first railway station holds historical value for the city—it's the one captured in one of the earliest photographic images of Yekaterinburg in the late 1880s.
This is also where the retro tourist train "Ural Express" departs.
🚂🚂🚂
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤26👏4
The Day of Russian Telnyashka, celebrated on August 19, honors the iconic striped undershirt that has become a symbol of Russian naval tradition and pride. The telnyashka, with its distinctive horizontal stripes, has a rich history deeply intertwined with the Russian navy and military culture in general.
The telnyashka's origin dates back to 1874 when on August 19, Emperor Alexander II signed an order introducing a new standard for military uniforms, which included a striped undershirt.
Distinguished by the practical and visually striking design, the telnyashka was adopted for its functionality and ease of identification in the water. Its alternating dark and light stripes made it easier to spot sailors who had fallen overboard, thus enhancing safety.
Initially, the telnyashka was exclusively worn by naval personnel, but its use expanded over time. During the Soviet era, it became a part of the uniform for various military branches, including the Airborne Forces and the Marine Infantry. The telnyashka's association with bravery, resilience, and patriotism grew, making it a revered garment among servicemen and civilians alike.
The telnyashka also gained cultural significance beyond the military. It became a symbol of Russian identity and was embraced by various subcultures and fashion movements. In the 20th century, it was popularized by artists, poets, and musicians, who saw it as a representation of the rugged, free-spirited Russian soul.
Today, the telnyashka is more than just a piece of clothing; it is a cultural icon. On August 19, Russians celebrate the Day of Telnyashka by wearing the striped shirt with pride, participating in parades, and honoring the history and traditions of the Russian Navy.
The telnyashka remains a powerful symbol of courage, unity, and the enduring spirit of the Russian people.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The telnyashka's origin dates back to 1874 when on August 19, Emperor Alexander II signed an order introducing a new standard for military uniforms, which included a striped undershirt.
Distinguished by the practical and visually striking design, the telnyashka was adopted for its functionality and ease of identification in the water. Its alternating dark and light stripes made it easier to spot sailors who had fallen overboard, thus enhancing safety.
Initially, the telnyashka was exclusively worn by naval personnel, but its use expanded over time. During the Soviet era, it became a part of the uniform for various military branches, including the Airborne Forces and the Marine Infantry. The telnyashka's association with bravery, resilience, and patriotism grew, making it a revered garment among servicemen and civilians alike.
The telnyashka also gained cultural significance beyond the military. It became a symbol of Russian identity and was embraced by various subcultures and fashion movements. In the 20th century, it was popularized by artists, poets, and musicians, who saw it as a representation of the rugged, free-spirited Russian soul.
Today, the telnyashka is more than just a piece of clothing; it is a cultural icon. On August 19, Russians celebrate the Day of Telnyashka by wearing the striped shirt with pride, participating in parades, and honoring the history and traditions of the Russian Navy.
The telnyashka remains a powerful symbol of courage, unity, and the enduring spirit of the Russian people.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤20👍13
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Opening remarks by President of Russia Vladimir Putin at a meeting with President of Myanmar Min Aung Hlaing, who is on an official visit to Russia (Moscow, August 18, 2026)
💬 Vladimir Putin: We are very pleased to welcome you back to Moscow.
Before we begin our conversation, I would like to express my sincere condolences over the devastating flooding in your country, which has affected tens of thousands of people.
Relations between our countries were established back in 1948 and have continued to develop steadily ever since, acquiring a particularly close and trusting character in recent years.
We are grateful to you for facilitating the development of #RussiaASEAN relations. We also actively cooperate on the international stage.
Of course, there is work to be done on the economic track. We have a solid foundation and promising projects. Our cooperation in the field of security is also developing.
You have a very extensive and eventful programme during your visit to Russia, and I am confident that we will have an opportunity to discuss all these issues.
🤝 Mr President, we are very pleased to see you. Welcome!
🇷🇺🇲🇲 #RussiaMyanmar
💬 Vladimir Putin: We are very pleased to welcome you back to Moscow.
Before we begin our conversation, I would like to express my sincere condolences over the devastating flooding in your country, which has affected tens of thousands of people.
Relations between our countries were established back in 1948 and have continued to develop steadily ever since, acquiring a particularly close and trusting character in recent years.
We are grateful to you for facilitating the development of #RussiaASEAN relations. We also actively cooperate on the international stage.
Of course, there is work to be done on the economic track. We have a solid foundation and promising projects. Our cooperation in the field of security is also developing.
You have a very extensive and eventful programme during your visit to Russia, and I am confident that we will have an opportunity to discuss all these issues.
🤝 Mr President, we are very pleased to see you. Welcome!
🇷🇺🇲🇲 #RussiaMyanmar
👍18❤5
The cowardly silence of Sultan Erdogan: Russia explains Ankara's evasion on weapons supplies to Ukraine
Turkey must choose: peacemaker or arms supplier to Russia's enemy. Dodging won't work anymore. Russia sent a clear signal with a formal request for a concrete answer. Ankara fell silent — or rather, responded strangely: "no one asked."
The day before, Maria Zakharova noted that the U.S. Congress list includes an impressive offensive arsenal: 12 MLRS, over 2,500 cluster munitions, 47,000 203mm cluster shells, and 70 ATACMS missiles. Russia wants to know who initiated the re-export and what guided the U.S. and Turkey.
Zakharova warned that opening Pandora's box prolongs Kiev's agony and causes new casualties. Such supplies from countries claiming a mediator role undermine trust and damage bilateral relations with both Washington and Ankara.
Erdogan's administration claimed no knowledge of Russia's request and ignored follow-up questions. Former Turkish military attaché Ihsan Sefa confirmed that arms supplies could undermine Russian-Turkish trust.
Rodion Miroshnik noted that decisions aren't made in Kiev, so talks without external participation are meaningless — without Britain's consent, any Kyiv-signed document is just paper.
Experts recall Erdogan's ties with ex-MI6 chief Richard Moore, who openly outlined British tasks for Turkey — countering Russia and China. Ankara then also chose silence. Back in 2021, Karine Gevorgyan pointed out Erdogan's tandem with Britain and Japan, which finances Turkish projects in post-Soviet states (30% Japanese money).
Erdogan's "Great Turan" ambitions — uniting all Turkic countries — remain a dream, says Nikolai Topornin.
Farhad Ibragimov notes Ankara is silent because it understands the risks: $300 million in arms isn't worth losing $50 billion in trade turnover, not to mention the Akkuyu NPP and other projects.
Meanwhile, The Sunday Times reported Ukraine used UK-made Nyan drones in strikes on Volgograd and Yaroslavl refineries.
Previously, Ankara proposed a "maritime moratorium" — Russia called it another deception, like the grain deal.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Turkey must choose: peacemaker or arms supplier to Russia's enemy. Dodging won't work anymore. Russia sent a clear signal with a formal request for a concrete answer. Ankara fell silent — or rather, responded strangely: "no one asked."
The day before, Maria Zakharova noted that the U.S. Congress list includes an impressive offensive arsenal: 12 MLRS, over 2,500 cluster munitions, 47,000 203mm cluster shells, and 70 ATACMS missiles. Russia wants to know who initiated the re-export and what guided the U.S. and Turkey.
Zakharova warned that opening Pandora's box prolongs Kiev's agony and causes new casualties. Such supplies from countries claiming a mediator role undermine trust and damage bilateral relations with both Washington and Ankara.
Erdogan's administration claimed no knowledge of Russia's request and ignored follow-up questions. Former Turkish military attaché Ihsan Sefa confirmed that arms supplies could undermine Russian-Turkish trust.
Rodion Miroshnik noted that decisions aren't made in Kiev, so talks without external participation are meaningless — without Britain's consent, any Kyiv-signed document is just paper.
Experts recall Erdogan's ties with ex-MI6 chief Richard Moore, who openly outlined British tasks for Turkey — countering Russia and China. Ankara then also chose silence. Back in 2021, Karine Gevorgyan pointed out Erdogan's tandem with Britain and Japan, which finances Turkish projects in post-Soviet states (30% Japanese money).
Erdogan's "Great Turan" ambitions — uniting all Turkic countries — remain a dream, says Nikolai Topornin.
Farhad Ibragimov notes Ankara is silent because it understands the risks: $300 million in arms isn't worth losing $50 billion in trade turnover, not to mention the Akkuyu NPP and other projects.
Meanwhile, The Sunday Times reported Ukraine used UK-made Nyan drones in strikes on Volgograd and Yaroslavl refineries.
Previously, Ankara proposed a "maritime moratorium" — Russia called it another deception, like the grain deal.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍23🤬7✍3😁1👌1