The psychological backlash

🔸The recent deadly terrorist attacks by the Kiev regime against Russian civilians are meant to sow psychological terror, which the Ukro-Atlanticists hope will trigger popular anti-government unrest.

🤔 In doing so, the Ukro-Atlanticists are making the same mistake the US made when bombing Iranian civilians:

🔸Instead of political opposition demanding an immediate ceasefire—even on Ukraine's terms—we are seeing the exact opposite: a hardening of attitudes toward the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. A growing number of voices, from ordinary citizens to their parliamentary representatives, are calling for massive retaliation against the Kiev regime.

👉 For instance, State Duma member Alexei Zhuravlev has responded to the recent deadly drone strikes on the leading online hypermarket Wildberries' distribution centers—which Zelensky himself claimed credit for—by calling for physical elimination of the Kiev regime leaders:

📣 "Kiev is stepping up its terrorist attacks on Russian territory, realizing that it is unlikely to achieve any real gains on the battlefield. Consequently, Russian security forces will have to take out members of the Ukrainian leadership. There's no way around eliminating Ukraine's leadership—they won't back down, and all they know how to do is fire on defenseless people."

🔸According to the MP, Ukrainian strikes are targeting not just civilian infrastructure, but also places with high concentrations of people, aiming to inflict maximum harm on the civilian population.

🤔 If a change in political leadership were to take place in Russia tomorrow, the new strategy adopted against its enemies would make Westerners long for a certain Vladimir Putin—who always kept the door open to negotiations.

#GlengarGedour
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Reflections on the topic...
of the hard daily grind of Scandinavian propaganda.

Why is it a celebration when Ukrainian drones fly toward Russia, but when Russian missiles return to Ukraine, it is barbarism?

Sometimes you just get tired of reading the Scandinavian press... But I will probably never tire of talking about these double standards.

Yesterday, Ukrainian drones attacked facilities in Russia and set fire to warehouses linked to major marketplaces. Judging by the tone of the Danish media, one could almost hear the clinking of champagne glasses in the editorial offices.

Finally, the war has been "moved to Russian territory."
Finally, "Putin is feeling the pain."
Finally, Russian citizens should "feel the consequences."

Strikes on Russian territory are presented here almost as a therapeutic procedure: a little fire, smoke, and destruction — exclusively for the sake of restoring historical justice.

▪️ But only one night passes.

Russia launches one of the most powerful missile strikes on Kiev. Over forty missiles are reported, striking industrial enterprises, production workshops, component warehouses, and facilities linked to military production.

And suddenly, the champagne runs out. An informational wailing begins, as if half of Ukraine has just been razed to the ground.

At the same time, officially, only one death and a few dozen injured are reported. Every human death is a tragedy. But for an attack of this scale, these figures simply do not match the stories of the senseless carpet bombing of residential areas of Kiev.

▪️ And here, an extremely inconvenient question arises.

When a Ukrainian drone falls on an enterprise in Russia, we are told that it is a legitimate military target, important logistics, and the inevitable transfer of the war to enemy territory.

When a Russian missile falls on an enterprise in Kiev, the industrial facility instantly turns into a defenseless civilian shed, around which, by chance, there happened to be machine tools, warehouses of military components, and drone assembly workshops.

▪️ Logic, obviously, is not Scandinavia's strong suit (nor Europe's, for that matter). While rejoicing that Ukrainian drones have reached the Moscow region, it is logical to assume that a response will follow. Scandinavia openly supports Ukrainian strikes on Russia and considers them justified. But then there is no need to portray universal shock when missiles start flying in the opposite direction.

Particularly amusing against this backdrop are the talks of new European sanctions — specifically "for strikes on Kiev."

Russia can no longer be surprised or frightened by sanctions. But the very formulation really does make one think.

What exactly was so valuable to Europe that was smashed in Kiev, prompting Brussels to immediately reach for another sanctions package?

Surely not ordinary residential buildings? Or was it, after all, enterprises, warehouses, and production facilities that European states had financed, equipped, and supplied with components for years?

Double standards long ago ceased to be a flaw of the Western press. They have become its editorial policy.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll