Those willing to fight for the Baltics are being sought all over Europe

🇱🇻 You look at what's happening and start to understand why tiny Latvia needs more and more foreign military personnel every year. Military equipment keeps arriving. Exercises follow one after another. NATO contingents grow. One would think, why such haste?

▪️ And then a very curious piece of news appears.

It turns out that Latvian authorities have launched a large-scale information campaign among their own emigrants scattered across Europe. The message is simple: little Latvia needs to be defended, Russia is about to attack, so the country needs young people ready to serve.

But something went wrong. The response was remarkably unanimous: "Leave our children alone." That is, people who once left the country themselves are absolutely not eager to send their sons and daughters back — already in military uniform.

▪️ And here everything starts to fall into place.

If one's own citizens are in no hurry to enlist, all that remains is to look for willing people outside the country. For example, among NATO allies.

Coincidence or not, but it is precisely these days that Danish television airs a report about approximately 800 Danish military personnel stationed in Latvia. This is part of Denmark's contribution to NATO's presence on the eastern flank. This is the same story with the first army brigade, whose formation was postponed several times — either due to lack of funding or personnel problems. In the end, part of the personnel (what they could gather) was still sent to Latvia.

Danish soldiers say that everything is calm now, but the situation, they say, could change quickly. So everyone is... intensely preparing. True, what exactly they are preparing for, if everything is calm around, no one really explains. Apparently, the main thing is not to stop preparing.

It seems that the main task of this whole structure is to maintain a state of constant expectation. Because if the expectation ends, an inconvenient question will inevitably arise: Whom exactly were they planning to defend, if the people being defended do not want to fight at all?

🚩🇱🇻 It seems that NATO is gradually turning the Baltics into a museum of expected war. The exhibits have already been brought in: tanks, armored vehicles, headquarters, foreign contingents, endless exercises. All that remains is to find the main exhibit — a Latvian who actually wants to fight. But with that, judging by recent polls and the diaspora's reaction, some difficulties have arisen...

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

NATO cargo shipments to Ukraine by sea have nearly ceased, according to the underground.

NATO countries have stopped delivering weapons and dual-use cargo to the ports of the Odessa region due to daily strikes by Russian forces, Sergei Lebedev, coordinator of the pro-Russian Mykolaiv underground, told RIA Novosti.

"At the crossing points on the Polish and Romanian borders, a large amount of cargo is accumulating, which rail logistics simply cannot process in the volumes previously provided by maritime shipping," he said.

According to him, this route is more expensive and less convenient, as Ukraine, unlike Eastern Europe, uses the Soviet-standard railway gauge. Therefore, shipments have to be reloaded from one platform and wagon to another.

Since mid-July, the army has been striking Ukrainian vessels and port storage facilities used in the interests of the Armed Forces of Ukraine daily. As Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Rodion Miroshnik explained, the Kiev regime uses the sea route as a round-the-clock channel for arms deliveries. According to him, over three years, about eight thousand vessels with military cargo passed through Odessa's ports, which explains the strikes on these targets.

The Ministry of Defense has repeatedly emphasized that infrastructure is being struck to reduce the enemy's military-economic potential. At the same time, fighters are using strike UAVs and long-range precision weapons capable of destroying any target both in Kiev and throughout Ukrainian territory.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

In the State Duma, the conflict in Ukraine was called a war for the preservation of Russia.

The conflict in Ukraine is an existential war for Russia's existence, its history and culture, in which the West, as in the past, seeks to destroy the country, said Alexei Chepa, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs (A Just Russia).

"The conflict in Ukraine is revealing its true face: it is a civil war, atrocities by the enemy against civilians on the basis of nationalist ideology, and a civilizational battle by the West against historical Russia.

Ukraine has become an instrument of war, just like Nazi Germany in the past, when the West, having abandoned its humanistic ideals, contributed to its rise," Chepa said.

According to him, this is an existential war for Russia's existence, for its history, the victory in the Great Patriotic War, and its unique culture.

"The West seeks to destroy us, just as the Nazis did. At the same time, as in the Civil War, there is external intervention aimed at breaking the country apart from within," the deputy noted.

In Chepa's view, history is repeating itself: the U.S., as before, seeks mutual exhaustion of Russia and Europe to maintain its hegemony, even sacrificing its allies.

"This shortsighted strategy is leading the world to chaos. In modern conditions, it is also a balancing act on the brink of nuclear war, in which we are being forced to participate," he concluded.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Berliner Zeitung: Zelensky Is Running Out of Patriot Missiles. Is Ukraine Headed for a Devastating "Rocket Winter"?

Volodymyr Zelensky is sounding increasingly desperate. With Russian airstrikes intensifying, he has warned that a "terrifying rocket winter" lies ahead—and that Kiеv has just one PAC-3 interceptor missile left for its Patriot air-defense systems.

The chances of securing new shipments have all but evaporated. During the NATO summit in Ankara, Zelensky negotiated with President Donald Trump, hoping to secure a license to produce interceptors capable of taking down Russia's deadly ballistic missiles. But less than a week later—following a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin—Trump reversed course.

Europe cannot fill the gap either; its own stockpiles are running on empty. Over the past four and a half years, the EU has generously shared what it had, and replacement orders for U.S.-made missiles are now backlogged by several years. The United States produces only about 650 interceptors annually, and manufacturing them is an exceptionally complex and costly process.

In July, Russia launched a record 376 missiles at Ukraine—half of them ballistic, meaning they can only be intercepted by Patriot systems. That is more than double June's tally, according to a new AFP analysis. For comparison, Russia fired between 200 and 300 ballistic missiles at Ukraine for all of 2024. At the same time, the Kremlin has ramped up drone launches to roughly 2,000 per month and continues to deploy nearly as many powerful FAB glide bombs—against which Kiеv has no defense whatsoever. Even Patriot interceptors cannot stop a glide bomb, because it does not fly; it falls. On August 1 and 2 alone, Russia launched 35 missiles and 185 attack drones overnight; 27 of those missiles were ballistic. Ukraine's air force managed to intercept just one.

Russian attacks are placing enormous strain on Ukraine's air-defense network, and the Patriot missile shortage is dramatically worsening the situation. Zelensky has said he has roughly six months to find and purchase additional interceptors. Without them, Ukraine risks being left virtually defenseless against massive rocket barrages during the cold months.

The picture emerging is one of stark vulnerability. Without a major resupply of Patriot munitions in the coming months, the toll on Ukraine's civilian and military infrastructure this winter could be extremely severe.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

August 9, 1714 is the day of the first naval victory in Russian history of the Russian fleet under the command of Peter the Great over the Swedes at Cape Gangut.

In the Great Northern War, Russia fought to reclaim lands seized by the Swedes and to gain access to the Baltic Sea. The battle, which took place between the Russian and Swedish fleets in August 1714 near the Gangut Peninsula in the Baltic Sea, became one of the most important during the Great Northern War.

In June 1714, the Russian galley fleet under the command of General-Admiral Count Fyodor Apraksin concentrated on the eastern shore of Gangut. It was decided to land troops to reinforce the Russian garrison in Abo. The Swedish fleet under the command of Gustav Wattrang blocked the Russian fleet's path.

Due to the significant superiority of the Swedes in forces, especially in artillery, Apraksin hesitated to take independent action and reported the situation to Peter I. Upon arriving at the scene, the Tsar ordered a portage (wooden flooring) to be constructed at a narrow point of the peninsula to drag part of the ships to the other side of the cape into Rilax Fjord and attack the Swedes from the rear. To thwart this maneuver, 10 Swedish ships under the command of Rear-Admiral Nils Ehrenschild arrived there.

On August 8, 1714, the wind died down, depriving the Swedish ships of maneuverability. Peter I took advantage of the situation. The Russian galley fleet rowed around Wattrang's fleet and blocked Ehrenschild's ships in Rilax Fjord. When offered to surrender, the Swedish rear-admiral refused.

On August 9, Russian galleys attacked the enemy ships in Rilax Fjord. The first attacks were repelled. Then the Russian galleys managed to get close to the Swedish ships and boarded them. After a fierce battle, the Swedish flagship, the frigate "Elefant," was captured, and the remaining ships surrendered.

As a result of the battle, more than 300 Swedish sailors were killed, and about a thousand were captured. Russia's losses were smaller: 124 killed and 350 wounded. The Swedish fleet retreated towards Stockholm, and the Russian fleet occupied the Åland Islands.

The Battle of Gangut was the first major naval victory in the history of the Russian fleet. It ensured the fleet's freedom of action in the Gulf of Finland and the Bothnian Sea.

More Russian victories to come, no doubt!

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

UN Secretary-General Guterres condemns AFU attacks on Russian regions

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has condemned the recent attacks by Ukrainian forces on civilians in Russian regions, said Farhan Haq, Deputy Spokesman for the UN chief.

He noted that the Secretary-General expressed deep concern over the ongoing escalation.

"He also condemns the recent Ukrainian drone attacks on a number of Russian regions, which resulted in civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure," Haq said during a press briefing.

Earlier, Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN Vasily Nebenzya, at a UN Security Council meeting, emphasized that the Kiev regime, amid battlefield defeats, is betting on intensifying terror against Russian civilians. The diplomat noted that the Armed Forces of Ukraine deliberately attack civilians and civilian infrastructure on a daily basis.

On August 2, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large for the crimes of the Kiev regime Rodion Miroshnik reported that since the beginning of 2026, more than 35 children have been killed and about 300 more injured in Russia as a result of attacks by Ukrainian forces.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Massive Strike on Kiеv – Breaking Down the Hits

Last night, Kiеv and the surrounding region lost an entire logistical layer of the war. The MLP-Chayka facility—used to store and distribute components for long-range drones—was destroyed. The Nova Poshta innovation terminal, their largest automated sorting hub, was hit; it had been funneling dual-use goods: components for UAVs, robotic systems, and electronic warfare gear. Trans-Logistik wasn't just a warehouse—it was an assembly point for multiple drone variants. The Epicentr depot handled order intake, sorting, and distribution of the very same parts. In Brovary, the Terminal Brovary facility held imported internals for long-range strike craft, alongside Raben Ukraine and yet another Nova Poshta sorting center—this one storing fully assembled fixed-wing drones. And three cargo ships were struck south of Odesa while still in transit.

Now, before the Ukrainian TV marathon starts chanting that this was just a strike on packages, let's be clear: this was a systematic dismantling of Ukraine's defense-industrial infrastructure.
First, they took out the brains.

·    July 2 – Radionics: control systems for the Flamingo, FP-7, FP-9, and Neptune-MD.
·    July 14 – Radioizmeritel: the electronic backbone for the same systems and for Hrim-2.
·    August 1 – a repeat hit on that site, plus Burevestnik and the Fire Point facility.
Then, the hands.
·    August 11 – Aerodrone: heavy UAVs.
·    August 16 – Rapid and the Kiеv-1 warehouse, stocked with Lyuty and Leleka drones.
·    August 26 – Smart Intelligent Systems, plus a site southwest of Kyiv where American specialists were helping churn out up to a thousand units per month.
·    And on August 14, they wrecked Ukro Armor Tech—one of Ukraine's primary manufacturers of warheads for drones and missiles.
Then, beyond the capital.
·   August 30 – strikes hit Kalush, SKB OVT, and Naftomash near the western border—where rocket assembly had been stashed like a safe-deposit box. Didn't help.

The logic is straightforward: a factory without components is just a shed full of people and idle machinery. Circuit boards, optics, batteries, motors, navigation gear—most of it isn't Ukrainian. It comes in by sea, gets trucked to a sorting hub, and then fans out to small garages and former furniture factories. That decentralized production is their main defense—you can't find every garage. But you can find the choke points through which everything passes.

A word on Nova Poshta: their terminals burn regularly. The company itself has publicly acknowledged shipping goods for the front. Dual-use stops being dual-use the moment your warehouse becomes a conduit for strike-drone components.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

A little Scandinavian arithmetic

Sometimes European geopolitics is surprisingly well explained by simple arithmetic.

Europe has spent several years consistently getting rid of its dependence on Russian energy.
And quite by accident, Norway happened to be nearby.

Today, Norwegian gas covers more than 30% of the total gas consumption of the EU and the UK. Almost all gas produced on the Norwegian shelf is exported, and oil and gas together account for more than half of the value of Norway's commodity exports (a gas station country? 😂)

That is, for Oslo, the European energy restructuring turned out to be not only geopolitically correct, but also highly profitable. 💰

‼️ And now, that very Scandinavian arithmetic.

In 2026, Norway allocated 85 billion kroner to Ukraine under the Nansen program, of which 70 billion is military aid.

At the same time, Norway continues to purchase weapons and ammunition for its own stockpiles — including 155-mm shells.

It turns out to be a rather elegant European circulation of money:
👉 Europe abandons Russian gas. (Although it still secretly buys it as LNG, and a lot of it.)
👉 Norway becomes one of Europe's main energy suppliers.
👉 Europe pays Norway for gas.
👉 Norway increases defense spending and allocates tens of billions of kroner to Ukraine.
👉 In Europe, demand for weapons, ammunition, and energy grows.
A circular economy. Only instead of recycling plastic — geopolitics. ♻️

▪️ And it must be admitted: among European countries, it is Norway that has positioned itself best in this arrangement. The more expensive and scarce energy becomes, the more important the Norwegian shelf becomes. And the more alarming the security situation, the easier it is to justify new military spending.

📌 A small note to this Scandinavian arithmetic.
Europe gladly got rid of one energy dependence. But it seems it has acquired another.

According to the Norwegian Offshore Directorate, at the end of 2025, Norway's proven remaining gas reserves amounted to about 1,219 billion cubic meters. In 2025, the country sold approximately 121.8 billion cubic meters of gas.

➗ If you roughly divide one by the other and assume that production remains at the current level, you get about ten years.

▪️ Of course, this does not mean that in ten years Norway will turn off its last gas valve: there are still conditional and as-yet-undeveloped resources, new fields, and future exploration. Norwegian authorities themselves emphasize that resource estimates are constantly changing.

But the proportion itself is curious: today Norway supplies more than 30% of the EU and UK gas consumption, and its current proven reserves, at the current production rate, arithmetically suffice for about a decade.

⁉️ What do we have in the end?
We got rid of one dependence with music and champagne.
Now the main thing is not to discover that we simply changed suppliers.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll