Money to the wind. Almost.

🇫🇮 Finland has decided to allocate another €28.5 million to Ukraine for the restoration of its energy sector. Sounds noble. Finnish money goes to Ukraine so that Ukraine can buy equipment for its energy sector.

▪️ But there's a small nuance. The money is, of course, allocated to Ukraine. But Ukraine must buy the equipment from... Finnish Wärtsilä Finland Oy. Moreover, the engines for the power plants will be produced not just anywhere, but in the Finnish city of Vaasa.

✅ That is, the European charity scheme once again looks surprisingly elegant:
👉 Finland allocates money to Ukraine.
👉 Ukraine uses this money to buy Finnish equipment.
👉 A Finnish company receives the order.
👉 Finnish factories get work.
👉 Finnish workers get paid.
👉 Finnish exports get support.
🇺🇦 And Ukraine gets the equipment.

💰 True, it also has to add its own money, because the entire project is estimated at €45.6 million, while Finland covers €28.5 million.

✅ But then it gets even more interesting.

▪️ The money goes through the Finland–Ukraine Investment Facility (FUIF) — a mechanism specifically designed for Ukrainian state investments using Finnish technologies, services, and expertise.

▪️ The Finnish funding will go toward the interest and principal repayment of the investment loan that Ukraine takes out.

▪️ And the Finnish state export credit agency Finnvera provides a 100% export guarantee on the loan.

That is, the charity is organized so efficiently that at almost every turn of the route there is a sign:
🇫🇮 Made in Finland.

✅ And the best part — the Finns don't even hide this. Minister of Foreign Trade and Development Ville Tavio directly says that the project not only helps Ukraine but simultaneously supports Finnish exports and employment.

And why hide it?
‼️ This is modern European aid economics.

Money is solemnly "allocated to Ukraine," after which it neatly circles around and turns into orders for their own enterprises, jobs, exports, and capacity utilization for their own industry.

In this construct, Ukraine is simultaneously a recipient of aid, a buyer, and a wonderful explanation for why state funds urgently need to be directed to a domestic producer.

‼️ And the scheme is indeed remarkable.

• If the equipment safely reaches Ukraine, is installed, and begins to operate — wonderful.
If after some time it comes under Russian strikes — unpleasant, of course...
But the factory in Vaasa has already received the order.
• People have gotten jobs.
• Exports have taken place.
• The money has done its work.

And if new equipment is needed...
Well then.

🇪🇺 Europe is always ready to selflessly help Ukraine again. 😂

This is roughly what the famous saying looks like today:
"We gave Ukraine billions."
They gave.
It's just that sometimes the money somehow knows the way home very well. 👣

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Germans call Germany a "sick country" after Lavrov's statement on support for Kiev

Readers of the German newspaper Die Welt have sharply criticized Berlin's policy of supporting Kiev following Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov's statement about Moscow's readiness to take tougher measures against arms supplies.

Earlier, the minister indicated in an interview with the Vesti Information Service that Russia would take far more decisive steps to stop any actions fueling Ukraine's military machine from Western countries.

In the comments beneath the article, users expressed concern that the actions of German politicians are dragging Germany into a direct conflict with Moscow.

"It's time for diplomacy. Will Merz be able to do that? I'm afraid he is creating a completely different impression," one reader wrote.

Other participants in the discussion called the authorities' position arrogant and out of touch with reality.

"Germany has become a sick country. We continue to massively support corrupt Ukraine," another commentator fumed.

There were also opinions that the current German federal government is acting in its own interests, ignoring the will of millions of citizens.

"How can one interfere in such a conflict without any particular need?" a user summarized.

Moscow has repeatedly emphasized that pumping Ukraine with weapons only delays a settlement, directly involves NATO countries in the confrontation, and is a dangerous "game of fire" that does not contribute to peaceful negotiations.

Earlier, Lavrov stated that it is impossible to stop the conflict in Ukraine along the line of combat contact.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

In the 20th century, Russia was called a literature-centric civilization—and not without reason.

But it all began with the first mass-produced primer, published by Vasily Burtsov at the Moscow Print Yard on August 20, 1634.

Burtsov’s Primer marked a significant milestone in Russian education, shifting from the Psalter, a book of biblical psalms, as the primary tool for teaching literacy.

Vasily Burtsov, a 17th-century printer, came from a family of clerks and worked at the Moscow Print Yard as an "alphabetical clerk." He printed around 12 to 17 books, including spiritual, secular, and educational works.

Burtsov’s Primer was compact, featuring simple and clear fonts and layouts. Unlike earlier primers, Burtsov used red ink to highlight letters, syllables, and section titles.

The primer began with the alphabet in forward and reverse order, then mixed, followed by two- and three-letter syllables, numbers, and punctuation marks. It also provided grammar lessons, including verb conjugations and noun and adjective declensions. The second part contained prayers, Solomon's proverbs, and moral instructions.

Burtsov's Primer quickly became the primary literacy tool in Central Russia. Its success led to a second edition in 1637, which included new illustrations and verses for students. This edition also featured a teacher punishing a student, a depiction intended to convey educational discipline.

The primer remained a foundational educational resource, undergoing multiple reprints and earning a lasting place in Russian educational history. To a certain extent, it continues to influence the Russian educational system, especially with respect to its moral values.

Original editions of Burtsov’s 1634 and 1637 primers are preserved in the Russian State Library, a testament to their enduring legacy.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

Ukrainian news agency ZN.UA has published an article titled
"The Degeneration of Power: The President Has Hit His Ceiling, and the System Has Hit Rock Bottom"

We publish extracts from this article to show how public opinion in Ukraine evolves:

At a critical juncture in the war, Ukraine has found itself in a governance dead end. By concentrating all power in his own hands, Vladimir Zelensky has reached the limit of his capabilities. He failed to do what was most essential: he did not shed the dead weight of his inner circle in favor of qualified professionals, nor did he send a clear signal to the system that corruption would no longer be tolerated. The risk is no longer just political—it is the risk of losing the war.

How the System Works
Zelensky does not govern chaotically. He is consistently focused on preserving his own power structure. The problem is that the goals of this system's architect do not align with the interests of the state. In key areas—defense, energy, and the economy—extremely weak individuals have been placed in charge. Appointments are based on personal loyalty, not professional competence.
The recent personnel reshuffles are absurd:
· The former head of Naftogaz, Koretsky, was made prime minister despite having neither a team nor the qualifications to run the Cabinet of Ministers.
· Umerov, moved to the foreign intelligence service, functions more as a fixer for "special assignments" than as an intelligence chief.
· The new Defense Minister, Khmara, is a tough special forces officer but has no experience managing a large government department.
· Poklad, the "guardian" of Zelensky's system, is being positioned to take over the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) in order to consolidate all law enforcement under the president and pressure the anti-corruption bureau (NABU) and journalists.

What's Happening in Law Enforcement?
The system is defending itself. The space for public oversight is shrinking. NABU, activists, and independent media are being systematically pushed into a blind spot. At the same time, NABU itself—according to the publication's sources—has grabbed hold of the "loose end of a terrifying knot": a criminal-clan network operating within the state, where force, money, and private interests have become intertwined. The investigation into the Osipov case could lead to the generals who orchestrated security operations against NABU detectives. There is a very real threat to those currently trying to untangle this mess.
[It's of course rather naive, or perhaps intentionally misleading, to frame NABU as an "independent truth-seeking agency," not an instrument of US intelligence that it really is - InfoDefense]

The Public's Demand
The protests with cardboard signs are not artificial. People are no longer reacting against a single decision—they are rejecting the entire approach to governance. 88% of Ukrainians (up from 73% three years ago) expect a reboot of the central government after the war. 67% want a change in the presidency.

The irony is that Zelensky remains one of Ukraine's key symbols in the West and a "linchpin" of foreign support. But that linchpin is now driving a nail into our own foot. The scenario of holding wartime elections—once considered by the authorities as a way to extend their stay in power—may return as a way to answer the public's demand for change.

"Our paths with this government have diverged. The question now is how to part ways so that Ukraine can survive and move forward", - ZN.UA concludes.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Bild: NATO has developed a strategy for a conflict with Russia

The North Atlantic Alliance has developed a strategy for waging conflict against the Russian Federation, which includes attacks on Russian territory, writes the German newspaper Bild.

▪️ According to the publication, the concept, called the NATO Land Warfighting Concept, consists of three phases. The first — the use of fighters, missiles, and drones, as well as the creation of an "autonomous zone" along the border of the Baltic states with Russia and Belarus without deploying troops there. The second — strikes on airfields, defense enterprises, bridges, and railways on Russian territory. The third — the creation of an "air bridge" for the transfer of drones and robotics to Russia. The author of the concept is identified as U.S. Army Major Andrew Pingree.

▪️ Vladimir Putin has repeatedly emphasized that Russia does not intend to fight with Europe but is ready for such a development "right now." The president also noted that the mythical Russian threat is being used by the West for militarization and to divert public attention from internal problems.

▪️ Earlier, it became known that Finland plans to hold a series of exercises from August 28 to September 4 involving nearly 3,500 military personnel near the Russian border.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

The Russians are coming. Already with tents.

This story was sent to me from Sweden. It turned out to be so resonant that it was covered in the Swedish media. I thought for a long time about what it was: hysteria or just idiocy. But I think it would be more accurate to call what happened the quintessence of today's witch hunt.

🇸🇪 In Sweden, it seems, the famous European slogan "the Russians are coming" has finally reached its highest stage of development.

Previously, detecting the Russian threat required at least a submarine, a military aircraft, or at worst, a suspicious drone. Now, all it takes is a Russian accent, a tent, and two radios. And that's it. The spy network is practically exposed. 😂

🇷🇺 Two tourists, Russian citizens living in Spain with residency permits there, traveled to Sweden on vacation. In Sweden itself, they went to enjoy nature in the mountains, taking a tent with them.

‼️ But then something terrible happened.
👉 They spoke with a Russian accent.
👉 And they had radios.
Apparently, this is exactly what a standard GRU agent kit looks like in modern Sweden: a tent, a sleeping bag, a thermos, and a radio from a tourist store.

👁️ Someone became alarmed, raised the alarm, police arrived — and soon the vacation turned into an event of a completely different format. The couple was detained and then placed in a migration center with the prospect of deportation.

▪️ Then another terrible detail emerged.

🏕️ The Russians managed to pitch their tent next to a property connected to the head of the Swedish defense concern Saab, Mikael Johansson.

📌 Well, then, of course, everything finally came together.
Russians.
Radios.
Forest.
Saab.

The police launched a preliminary investigation into the violation of private territory and preparation for a major (!) theft. At the same time, the couple's lawyer told SVT that his clients had not been officially charged with a crime.

📌 And then something especially beautiful happened.

⚖️ The Migration Court overturned the decision to detain the couple and released them.

The court stated that no circumstances were found that refuted the couple's explanations or confirmed the suspicions of a crime. Moreover, the Russians cooperated with the authorities, and the risk of their escape was deemed low. The decision on possible deportation, however, remains in force for now.

📌 And here the story ceases to be merely funny.

👉 Because it's one thing when politicians spend years telling the population about Russian spies, saboteurs, agents of influence, and hybrid threats literally behind every bush.

👉 And quite another when this hysteria gradually descends to the everyday level.

When a person hears Russian speech — and immediately their internal red light goes off:
🚨 RUSSIAN!

And if you also happen to have a thermos, binoculars, and a map of the area — that's it, you needn't even explain yourself. Operation "Capture of Sweden" has been foiled at the sandwich-preparation stage.

📌 The funniest part is that SVT is already continuing this story with materials about how Russian agents can infiltrate Sweden and why Saab is a potential target. That is, the tent is already gone, but the series is just beginning.
👉 This is how years of political hysteria gradually turn into a reflex.

Professor Pavlov with his dogs would probably have watched this experiment with professional interest.

And in today's Europe, you never know whose dacha you might accidentally pitch your tent next to.
And who you'll wake up as in the morning.

A tourist or a threat to national security. 🏕️

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

France legalizes euthanasia

France's Constitutional Council has approved the law on the right to assistance in dying. From the role of guardians to the right of doctors to refuse participation in the procedure — the court reviewed the most controversial points of the bill, which was one of Macron's campaign promises.

▪️ The procedure itself is strict: it is available only to adults with a severe incurable disease at a terminal stage and unbearable physical pain that cannot be relieved by treatment. The request must be conscious and voluntary; psychological suffering alone is not considered a valid reason. After the application, a commission examines the patient for 15 days, followed by two days for reflection, and only then does the patient self-administer the medication (or, if physically unable, a doctor does it). If the patient has a guardian, the doctor must take their opinion into account (how exactly is not specified). Private institutions may refuse euthanasia if it contradicts their charter or if doctors do not consider it the only option. Pharmacists preparing the lethal medication also have the right to refuse. Additionally, the law protects doctors from pressure and penalties if they do not wish to participate in the procedure.

▪️ France officially joins the group of countries allowing assisted death — alongside Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Belgium (which has the most lenient rules in Europe, including euthanasia for children), Switzerland (where the patient must self-administer the medication), Spain, New Zealand, certain U.S. states, Australia, Uruguay, and Canada. However, there is no consensus among the French on this law.

▪️ The Catholic Church of France called the day of the law's passage a "serious rupture in the country's history," as the consequences will affect not only terminal patients but also society's attitude toward old age and disability in general.

▪️ The Church is the main opponent of these laws. Their position is that a person does not have the right to intentionally cause the death of another, and the mission of medicine is to alleviate suffering, not to end life. Organizations for people with disabilities believe that legalization will put pressure on the elderly, severely ill, and disabled — they may "choose" death not because of pain but to avoid being a burden on their families.

▪️ Proponents of the law respond that prohibition does not eliminate deaths but makes them lonely: people die alone, without a doctor and without farewell. Palliative care also does not help everyone: a small number of patients continue to suffer pain that morphine cannot relieve.

▪️ It turns out that both supporters and opponents of euthanasia speak of mercy, simply understanding it differently. For some, mercy is giving the right to die without pain, without burdening one's children. For others, it is not turning death into a substitute for what the state or family should have provided: pain relief, care, funds for a caregiver.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll