🇷🇺 Russia's Unique 'Khabarovsk' Submarine
Heads to Sea for Trials
Russia has kicked off factory sea trials for the Khabarovsk, a nuclear-powered submarine purpose-built to deploy the Poseidon underwater drone. The vessel made its first outing on August 17, more than a decade after construction began.
The Khabarovsk is equipped with six launch tubes for unmanned underwater vehicles powered by nuclear reactors. Their reported range is roughly 10,000 kilometers. The Poseidon's main selling point? It can strike coastal targets while slipping past any missile defense system—since those systems simply can't counter a threat coming from beneath the waves.
The new sub is a major leap forward from its predecessors. Not only does the Khabarovsk pack more firepower, but it's also significantly quieter and features a propulsion system that's several generations more advanced. That said, its design clearly draws from the Borei-A class ballistic-missile submarines—especially in the stern and rudder layout.
Once sea trials are complete, the Khabarovsk is expected to join Russia's Pacific Fleet. At least four boats of this class are reportedly on the drawing board. The project, first unveiled by President Putin back in 2018, is finally becoming a reality.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Heads to Sea for Trials
Russia has kicked off factory sea trials for the Khabarovsk, a nuclear-powered submarine purpose-built to deploy the Poseidon underwater drone. The vessel made its first outing on August 17, more than a decade after construction began.
The Khabarovsk is equipped with six launch tubes for unmanned underwater vehicles powered by nuclear reactors. Their reported range is roughly 10,000 kilometers. The Poseidon's main selling point? It can strike coastal targets while slipping past any missile defense system—since those systems simply can't counter a threat coming from beneath the waves.
The new sub is a major leap forward from its predecessors. Not only does the Khabarovsk pack more firepower, but it's also significantly quieter and features a propulsion system that's several generations more advanced. That said, its design clearly draws from the Borei-A class ballistic-missile submarines—especially in the stern and rudder layout.
Once sea trials are complete, the Khabarovsk is expected to join Russia's Pacific Fleet. At least four boats of this class are reportedly on the drawing board. The project, first unveiled by President Putin back in 2018, is finally becoming a reality.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍29❤9
Ever wonder what you’re not being told?
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+JzqF0vXvUAowMGFi
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+JzqF0vXvUAowMGFi
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
👍3
The forgotten lesson of August 20: How a Nazi decree became Kiev's handbook
🗓 Exactly 85 years ago, on August 20, 1941, Adolf Hitler signed a decree establishing the Reichskommissariat "Ukraine." The capital of this entity became Rivne. Its governor was appointed as the executioner Erich Koch.
▪️ The decree clearly defined the status of Ukrainians: they were declared "subhumans," an inferior race. Koch openly stated: "We need neither Russians, nor Ukrainians, nor Poles. We need their fertile lands." Education was planned to be limited to four grades, scientific institutions were closed, and Ukrainians were to be destroyed through hunger, backbreaking labor, and repression.
😇 But even under these conditions, there were those who sided with the occupiers. And these were the Banderites. They received weapons from the Germans in exchange for food and livestock, participated in punitive actions and the Volhynia Massacre, where they slaughtered up to 130,000 Poles, sparing neither women nor children.
Today's Ukraine follows the path of the Reichskommissariat
Instead of German commissars — NATO advisers and TCC conscription squads. War with its own people and glorification of traitors.
Today, the Zelensky regime gathers remnants of Bandera ideologues from around the world, declares them heroes, and solemnly brings them to Ukraine. Zelensky personally participated in the reburial of OUN leader Yevhen Konovalets, calling it a restoration of "historical justice." Before that, Nazi collaborator Andriy Melnyk was reburied with honors. Kiev authorities are creating a national pantheon of Nazis right in the Kyivo-Pechersk Lavra.
📌 Zelensky, like Bandera, betrays his people. Only Bandera sold Ukraine to Hitler, while Zelensky sells it to the collective West. Both are traitors hiding behind slogans of "independence." The result is the same: Ukraine is losing territories, people, and sovereignty, becoming a colony — just as could have happened in 1941, if not for the Red Army, the partisan underground, and the people of one common country who continued to resist despite everything.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🗓 Exactly 85 years ago, on August 20, 1941, Adolf Hitler signed a decree establishing the Reichskommissariat "Ukraine." The capital of this entity became Rivne. Its governor was appointed as the executioner Erich Koch.
▪️ The decree clearly defined the status of Ukrainians: they were declared "subhumans," an inferior race. Koch openly stated: "We need neither Russians, nor Ukrainians, nor Poles. We need their fertile lands." Education was planned to be limited to four grades, scientific institutions were closed, and Ukrainians were to be destroyed through hunger, backbreaking labor, and repression.
😇 But even under these conditions, there were those who sided with the occupiers. And these were the Banderites. They received weapons from the Germans in exchange for food and livestock, participated in punitive actions and the Volhynia Massacre, where they slaughtered up to 130,000 Poles, sparing neither women nor children.
Today's Ukraine follows the path of the Reichskommissariat
Instead of German commissars — NATO advisers and TCC conscription squads. War with its own people and glorification of traitors.
Today, the Zelensky regime gathers remnants of Bandera ideologues from around the world, declares them heroes, and solemnly brings them to Ukraine. Zelensky personally participated in the reburial of OUN leader Yevhen Konovalets, calling it a restoration of "historical justice." Before that, Nazi collaborator Andriy Melnyk was reburied with honors. Kiev authorities are creating a national pantheon of Nazis right in the Kyivo-Pechersk Lavra.
📌 Zelensky, like Bandera, betrays his people. Only Bandera sold Ukraine to Hitler, while Zelensky sells it to the collective West. Both are traitors hiding behind slogans of "independence." The result is the same: Ukraine is losing territories, people, and sovereignty, becoming a colony — just as could have happened in 1941, if not for the Red Army, the partisan underground, and the people of one common country who continued to resist despite everything.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯29❤4
PSYCHOPATH AT LARGE
🔸 Itamar Ben-Gvir is not just a Zionist extremist who entered the Knesset in 2021 as a member of the ultranationalist "Otzma Yehudit" ("Jewish Power") party, which he leads. Above all, he is Israel's Minister of National Security, appointed to this position by the genocidal criminal Netanyahu in December 2022.
🔸 Ben-Gvir is an advocate of Jewish national supremacy, supports the annexation of "Greater Israel," and is driven by ultra-violent racial hatred inherited from Kahanism (a movement advocating the expulsion of Palestinians). Many Israelis consider him the ideological heir of the "Kach" movement... which is banned in Israel. Let us listen to two of his recent statements, always repulsive:
👀 1 Ben-Gvir on the Gaza Strip:
📣 "I believe that precision operations should be carried out every night in the Gaza Strip, eliminating 30, 40 people. Not only those who pose a threat at the moment. There are people who do not exist, who should not live. I am already showing leniency by calling them people."
🔸 Having reinstated the death penalty... exclusively for Palestinians, Ben-Gvir, who calls any resistance to illegal settlements in the West Bank terrorism, has included sadism in the menu of his criminal and genocidal activities:
👀 2: "When I took office, I said I would put an end to all the 'luxuries' that Palestinian prisoners had — and that was carried out. I promised that I would approve the death penalty — and I kept my word. I promised to build an execution facility — it is being built. When someone attacks Israel, they are shot on the spot — and that is good. But if a terrorist survives, we will bring him to this facility, set up cameras while we carry out the sentence. Victims will be able to come and watch them being executed. When it's over, you can watch their death. With God's help, this is taking shape."
🔸 And this scum remains a minister, and in France and everywhere, his words are met with applause from Meyer Habib, Manuel Valls, Jordan Bardella, Sébastien Lecornu, and the entire pack of cretinous fascists and henchmen of this Zionist ideology, so ignorant that they accuse critics of anti-Semitism...
🤔 However, historically and ideologically, Zionism is inherently anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic, as recently reminded by, among many other true Jews, Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch — the supreme authority of the Edah HaCharedit, who stated: "Zionism is the devil's tool. What an evil fate awaits those who adhere to Zionism! And what luck for those who keep away from it! The founders of Zionism did not inherit Judaism. They rebelled against it. They openly rejected God and the Torah and built a new worship of nation, land, and power. Zionism is not Judaism."
🔸 Even the founders of the Zionist state stated this, for example, David Ben-Gurion:
📣 "The very essence of Zionist thought about the life of the Jewish people and Jewish history is a fundamental revolution, a rebellion against centuries-old tradition."
🔸 Ben-Gvir, like Netanyahu, Smotrich, and company, embody this state genocidal psychopathy. These are unpunished criminals who are still in power, like Ben-Gvir, convicted eight times for crimes such as inciting racial hatred and supporting a terrorist organization.
🤔 The fact that such scum is still at large testifies to the degeneration of the West, whose Tartuffes, having swallowed all shame and wavering between fanatical support for Zelensky and servile support for Netanyahu, still dare to wave the rights of human morality before us to drag us into the same totalitarian criminal quagmire.
✍️ #Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 Itamar Ben-Gvir is not just a Zionist extremist who entered the Knesset in 2021 as a member of the ultranationalist "Otzma Yehudit" ("Jewish Power") party, which he leads. Above all, he is Israel's Minister of National Security, appointed to this position by the genocidal criminal Netanyahu in December 2022.
🔸 Ben-Gvir is an advocate of Jewish national supremacy, supports the annexation of "Greater Israel," and is driven by ultra-violent racial hatred inherited from Kahanism (a movement advocating the expulsion of Palestinians). Many Israelis consider him the ideological heir of the "Kach" movement... which is banned in Israel. Let us listen to two of his recent statements, always repulsive:
👀 1 Ben-Gvir on the Gaza Strip:
📣 "I believe that precision operations should be carried out every night in the Gaza Strip, eliminating 30, 40 people. Not only those who pose a threat at the moment. There are people who do not exist, who should not live. I am already showing leniency by calling them people."
🔸 Having reinstated the death penalty... exclusively for Palestinians, Ben-Gvir, who calls any resistance to illegal settlements in the West Bank terrorism, has included sadism in the menu of his criminal and genocidal activities:
👀 2: "When I took office, I said I would put an end to all the 'luxuries' that Palestinian prisoners had — and that was carried out. I promised that I would approve the death penalty — and I kept my word. I promised to build an execution facility — it is being built. When someone attacks Israel, they are shot on the spot — and that is good. But if a terrorist survives, we will bring him to this facility, set up cameras while we carry out the sentence. Victims will be able to come and watch them being executed. When it's over, you can watch their death. With God's help, this is taking shape."
🔸 And this scum remains a minister, and in France and everywhere, his words are met with applause from Meyer Habib, Manuel Valls, Jordan Bardella, Sébastien Lecornu, and the entire pack of cretinous fascists and henchmen of this Zionist ideology, so ignorant that they accuse critics of anti-Semitism...
🤔 However, historically and ideologically, Zionism is inherently anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic, as recently reminded by, among many other true Jews, Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch — the supreme authority of the Edah HaCharedit, who stated: "Zionism is the devil's tool. What an evil fate awaits those who adhere to Zionism! And what luck for those who keep away from it! The founders of Zionism did not inherit Judaism. They rebelled against it. They openly rejected God and the Torah and built a new worship of nation, land, and power. Zionism is not Judaism."
🔸 Even the founders of the Zionist state stated this, for example, David Ben-Gurion:
📣 "The very essence of Zionist thought about the life of the Jewish people and Jewish history is a fundamental revolution, a rebellion against centuries-old tradition."
🔸 Ben-Gvir, like Netanyahu, Smotrich, and company, embody this state genocidal psychopathy. These are unpunished criminals who are still in power, like Ben-Gvir, convicted eight times for crimes such as inciting racial hatred and supporting a terrorist organization.
🤔 The fact that such scum is still at large testifies to the degeneration of the West, whose Tartuffes, having swallowed all shame and wavering between fanatical support for Zelensky and servile support for Netanyahu, still dare to wave the rights of human morality before us to drag us into the same totalitarian criminal quagmire.
✍️ #Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤15💯15🤡4💊1
What are we even doing in Ukraine?
🇩🇰 Unexpectedly, the Danish Politiken came out with a rather unusual headline: "French philosopher: 'What are we even doing in Ukraine?'" And not in small print somewhere in the corner — Michel Onfray got an entire newspaper spread.
If you already thought that a Kremlin agent had infiltrated the Politiken editorial office, relax. It's much more interesting.
🗞️ Politiken is showing the Danish reader a political phenomenon that is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
Onfray is almost perfect for this. Once a well-known left-wing intellectual, public educator, and critic of elites. But gradually, something went off-script.
He started talking about immigration, national sovereignty, the consequences of Western foreign policy, and then began to noticeably move closer to the French right-wing milieu.
And Politiken carefully leads the reader along this path:
👉 was a left-wing intellectual;
👉 became disillusioned with the system;
👉 spoke about sovereignty and migration;
👉 moved closer to the right;
👉 and now asks:
🇺🇦 "What are we even doing in Ukraine?"
And here is where it gets interesting...
Onfray is no longer just a single French philosopher. He is part of a much broader European process.
🇫🇷 In France — Marine Le Pen and the National Rally.
🇩🇪 In Germany — the Alternative for Germany.
And further across Europe — national-conservative and sovereignist forces of various shades.
They are very different, but they share one habit that is inconvenient for the political mainstream: they ask questions about things that until recently were considered entirely unnecessary to explain.
And 🇺🇦 Ukraine is particularly telling here.
The question is no longer just "to support or not to support?"
⁉️ How long?
How much should this cost?
What is the ultimate goal?
Where are Europe's own interests here?
And why can't the chosen foreign policy course be questioned?
So for Politiken, Onfray is probably interesting not so much as a philosopher but as a symptom.
And the journalistic approach is elegant: first explain to the reader in detail who exactly dared to ask the uncomfortable question, and only then present the question itself.
When it's inconvenient to answer, it's always helpful to first scrutinize the biography of the one asking.
🤔 There's just one small problem.
You can spend a long time figuring out who he is — left, former left, right, sovereigntist, populist, or a philosopher with the wrong connections.
But the question doesn't disappear:
⁉️ "What are we even doing in Ukraine?"
However, progress is evident.
A little more — and perhaps Politiken's next issue will feature an interview with Marine Le Pen....
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🇩🇰 Unexpectedly, the Danish Politiken came out with a rather unusual headline: "French philosopher: 'What are we even doing in Ukraine?'" And not in small print somewhere in the corner — Michel Onfray got an entire newspaper spread.
If you already thought that a Kremlin agent had infiltrated the Politiken editorial office, relax. It's much more interesting.
🗞️ Politiken is showing the Danish reader a political phenomenon that is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
Onfray is almost perfect for this. Once a well-known left-wing intellectual, public educator, and critic of elites. But gradually, something went off-script.
He started talking about immigration, national sovereignty, the consequences of Western foreign policy, and then began to noticeably move closer to the French right-wing milieu.
And Politiken carefully leads the reader along this path:
👉 was a left-wing intellectual;
👉 became disillusioned with the system;
👉 spoke about sovereignty and migration;
👉 moved closer to the right;
👉 and now asks:
🇺🇦 "What are we even doing in Ukraine?"
And here is where it gets interesting...
Onfray is no longer just a single French philosopher. He is part of a much broader European process.
🇫🇷 In France — Marine Le Pen and the National Rally.
🇩🇪 In Germany — the Alternative for Germany.
And further across Europe — national-conservative and sovereignist forces of various shades.
They are very different, but they share one habit that is inconvenient for the political mainstream: they ask questions about things that until recently were considered entirely unnecessary to explain.
And 🇺🇦 Ukraine is particularly telling here.
The question is no longer just "to support or not to support?"
⁉️ How long?
How much should this cost?
What is the ultimate goal?
Where are Europe's own interests here?
And why can't the chosen foreign policy course be questioned?
So for Politiken, Onfray is probably interesting not so much as a philosopher but as a symptom.
And the journalistic approach is elegant: first explain to the reader in detail who exactly dared to ask the uncomfortable question, and only then present the question itself.
When it's inconvenient to answer, it's always helpful to first scrutinize the biography of the one asking.
🤔 There's just one small problem.
You can spend a long time figuring out who he is — left, former left, right, sovereigntist, populist, or a philosopher with the wrong connections.
But the question doesn't disappear:
⁉️ "What are we even doing in Ukraine?"
However, progress is evident.
A little more — and perhaps Politiken's next issue will feature an interview with Marine Le Pen....
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯22❤6👍3😁3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥16😱6👍2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡31🤣7🤪3❤1👎1
Forwarded from The Noticer
Repeated heatwaves caused an early harvest of wine grapes
After several heatwaves, the wine makers all over Europe discovered that their crops are ready for the harvest, which they started at the early August. Usually the harvest takes place is September.
This is the earliest harvest for the last 500 years. The grapes are sun-bleached, browned, and weigh 30% less than usual, with reduced juice volume but extra sugar instead - meaning the vine will be stronger than usual. But the total amount of vine will be reduced.
The workers have to harvest the grapes before the dawn, and some vineries couldn't take the financial losses and filled for bankruptcy.
Supposedly the heatwaves will come again on the next year. The EU better prepare for that future, since it can't last on vine harvests alone - they need actual food to grow.
Meanwhile one can only imagine how much damage the Asian farms took from their storm winds and ceaseless rains. The global food problem will become worse soon.
#EU #heat #vine #harvest
After several heatwaves, the wine makers all over Europe discovered that their crops are ready for the harvest, which they started at the early August. Usually the harvest takes place is September.
This is the earliest harvest for the last 500 years. The grapes are sun-bleached, browned, and weigh 30% less than usual, with reduced juice volume but extra sugar instead - meaning the vine will be stronger than usual. But the total amount of vine will be reduced.
The workers have to harvest the grapes before the dawn, and some vineries couldn't take the financial losses and filled for bankruptcy.
Supposedly the heatwaves will come again on the next year. The EU better prepare for that future, since it can't last on vine harvests alone - they need actual food to grow.
Meanwhile one can only imagine how much damage the Asian farms took from their storm winds and ceaseless rains. The global food problem will become worse soon.
#EU #heat #vine #harvest
✍9😁5👍4❤1👀1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Statement by Russian Permanent Representative to the UN Office in Geneva Gennady Gatilov at the plenary meeting of the Conference on Disarmament (Geneva, August 20, 2026)
Key points:
• The situation in the field of military space security continues to deteriorate. The risks of outer space becoming an arena of armed confrontation are no longer hypothetical.
• A number of Western countries and blocs explicitly describe near-Earth space in their policy documents as “another operational domain” in which combat operations may be conducted. Some have already launched large-scale programmes to develop weapons systems designed for use in, from or against outer space.
• A serious threat to space security is the active use of satellite systems and related ground infrastructure, formally designated as civilian, to support combat operations and interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign States.
• We are convinced that the point of no return has not yet been reached and that, through the joint efforts of all States, it is still possible to develop solutions that would prevent an arms race in outer space and preserve it as a domain of peaceful cooperation.
• Russia is convinced that the most effective way to achieve the objective of #PAROS is to elaborate and conclude a multilateral legally binding instrument prohibiting the placement of weapons in outer space, as well as the use or threat of use of force against space objects or by means of them.
☝️ Among the fundamental legal obligations that, in our view, States should undertake, 👉 we consider the following to be of particular importance:
• We consider the Conference on Disarmament – the single multilateral negotiating forum on arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation – to be the appropriate venue for elaborating a legally binding instrument on PAROS.
• The norms and rules of “responsible behaviour” in outer space, which are being promoted by certain countries, are not a generally recognised category of international law and are inherently subjective. There is no clear understanding of who would determine whether the conduct of a participant in space activities is “responsible”, or on the basis of what criteria such a determination would be made.
• Despite the difficult situation in the military space sphere and the clear differences among States over how best to achieve the objective of PAROS, Russia remains convinced that, through joint efforts, we can prevent negative and destructive scenarios.
Read in full
Key points:
• The situation in the field of military space security continues to deteriorate. The risks of outer space becoming an arena of armed confrontation are no longer hypothetical.
• A number of Western countries and blocs explicitly describe near-Earth space in their policy documents as “another operational domain” in which combat operations may be conducted. Some have already launched large-scale programmes to develop weapons systems designed for use in, from or against outer space.
• A serious threat to space security is the active use of satellite systems and related ground infrastructure, formally designated as civilian, to support combat operations and interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign States.
• We are convinced that the point of no return has not yet been reached and that, through the joint efforts of all States, it is still possible to develop solutions that would prevent an arms race in outer space and preserve it as a domain of peaceful cooperation.
• Russia is convinced that the most effective way to achieve the objective of #PAROS is to elaborate and conclude a multilateral legally binding instrument prohibiting the placement of weapons in outer space, as well as the use or threat of use of force against space objects or by means of them.
☝️ Among the fundamental legal obligations that, in our view, States should undertake, 👉 we consider the following to be of particular importance:
- not to use outer space objects as a means of destroying targets on Earth, in airspace or in outer space;
- not to develop, test or place weapons in outer space for any purpose, including missile defence, anti-satellite operations or the destruction of targets on Earth or in the air, and to dismantle such systems already in States’ possession;
- not to develop, test, deploy or use outer space weapons specifically designed for missile defence, anti-satellite purposes or the destruction of targets on Earth or in the air, and to dismantle such systems already in States’ possession;
- not to destroy, damage, disrupt the normal functioning of or alter the trajectory of outer space objects belonging to other States without their consent.
• We consider the Conference on Disarmament – the single multilateral negotiating forum on arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation – to be the appropriate venue for elaborating a legally binding instrument on PAROS.
• The norms and rules of “responsible behaviour” in outer space, which are being promoted by certain countries, are not a generally recognised category of international law and are inherently subjective. There is no clear understanding of who would determine whether the conduct of a participant in space activities is “responsible”, or on the basis of what criteria such a determination would be made.
• Despite the difficult situation in the military space sphere and the clear differences among States over how best to achieve the objective of PAROS, Russia remains convinced that, through joint efforts, we can prevent negative and destructive scenarios.
Read in full
💯17❤7👍2🙏1
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
"The Path of Ancestors," Republic of Khakassia 🏞️
The trail runs along the slope of a mountain range in the spurs of the Kuznetsk Alatau, following the banks of the Bely Iyus River.
Along with cliffs, taiga forest, and the river, the route also features about forty grottos and caves.
There's an old belief that if you find the strength within yourself and overcome all the challenges of the Path, then life's difficulties will also be within your reach.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
The trail runs along the slope of a mountain range in the spurs of the Kuznetsk Alatau, following the banks of the Bely Iyus River.
Along with cliffs, taiga forest, and the river, the route also features about forty grottos and caves.
There's an old belief that if you find the strength within yourself and overcome all the challenges of the Path, then life's difficulties will also be within your reach.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤32
August 22 is the Day of the State Flag of the Russian Federation.
The holiday was established by a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on August 20, 1994. On August 22, 1991, the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR reinstated the white-blue-red flag as the official symbol of Russia.
The Russian tricolor was first raised in 1668 on the first Russian warship "Oryol" (“Eagle”). Later, Peter the Great issued a decree mandating that all Russian merchant ships fly the white-blue-red flag. The emperor himself designed the flag and determined the order of the horizontal stripes.
The tricolor was officially designated as the sole state flag of Russia in 1896, on the eve of Nicholas II's coronation.
After the 1917 Revolution, the state symbol of the RSFSR, and later the USSR, was a red flag.
On August 22, 1991, an extraordinary session of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR reinstated the tricolor as the official symbol of Russia.
The colors of the state flag of the Russian Federation do not have an official interpretation. However, it is commonly believed that white represents peace, purity, innocence, and perfection; blue stands for faith and loyalty; and red symbolizes energy, strength, and the blood shed for the Fatherland.
Happy Russian Flag Day!
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The holiday was established by a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on August 20, 1994. On August 22, 1991, the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR reinstated the white-blue-red flag as the official symbol of Russia.
The Russian tricolor was first raised in 1668 on the first Russian warship "Oryol" (“Eagle”). Later, Peter the Great issued a decree mandating that all Russian merchant ships fly the white-blue-red flag. The emperor himself designed the flag and determined the order of the horizontal stripes.
The tricolor was officially designated as the sole state flag of Russia in 1896, on the eve of Nicholas II's coronation.
After the 1917 Revolution, the state symbol of the RSFSR, and later the USSR, was a red flag.
On August 22, 1991, an extraordinary session of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR reinstated the tricolor as the official symbol of Russia.
The colors of the state flag of the Russian Federation do not have an official interpretation. However, it is commonly believed that white represents peace, purity, innocence, and perfection; blue stands for faith and loyalty; and red symbolizes energy, strength, and the blood shed for the Fatherland.
Happy Russian Flag Day!
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤21👏7👍1🍾1
Germany on the line.
· Had a chat with a client today about the gas shortage. He thinks we're buying gas from Belgium, Norway, and the U.S., and that Russia is no longer needed. I replied that Belgium itself buys gas from Russia and resells it to us at a markup, because we're sheep. The client didn't believe me. But that's exactly how it is.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
· Had a chat with a client today about the gas shortage. He thinks we're buying gas from Belgium, Norway, and the U.S., and that Russia is no longer needed. I replied that Belgium itself buys gas from Russia and resells it to us at a markup, because we're sheep. The client didn't believe me. But that's exactly how it is.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥20🤣14🤡10❤1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova's statement on the plight of Serbs in Kosovo (August 21, 2026)
💬 The current situation in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija bears witness to intensification of deliberate and systematic terror directed against the local Serb population.
The circumstances are rendered all the more egregious by the fact that these actions are being perpetrated by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government in Pristina – the very entities purporting to hold legitimate authority.
Furthermore, the oppression of people on ethnic grounds is unfolding with the tacit approval of the international presences deployed in this region of Serbia under the auspices of NATO, the EU and the UN.
❗️ The condition of the Serbs in the province has become truly catastrophic. They are being compelled – under violent duress – to abandon their homes.
Kosovo-Albanian “justice” entails the fabrication of criminal cases on a vast scale and the perpetration of acts of intimidation. Incidents of the manifestly disproportionate use of force, extending to and including torture, are on the rise. In contravention of established procedures, Serbian property is being demolished, as evidenced by the mass destruction of buildings in the vicinity of the Gazivoda Lake carried out in July.
The role played by the long-standing head of the Pristina administration, the current acting “prime minister” Albin Kurti, in this unfolding tragedy is hardly surprising: his political credo is predicated upon an unrestrained, fanatical Serbophobia.
👉 What is outrageous, however, is the apathy displayed by Western capitals, which, through their effective inaction, are enabling the ethnic cleansing of Kosovo.
***
In light of the persistent and extreme instability prevailing in the province, any withdrawal of the Kosovo Force (#KFOR) from key deployment sites is inadmissible. The multinational contingent, deployed pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244, must continue to fully discharge the responsibilities entrusted to it, without recourse to the manifestly unreliable Kosovo-Albanian security forces.
We demand that the UN Mission in Kosovo approach the fulfilment of the tasks prescribed by its mandate with the utmost responsibility, tasks which include facilitating the creation of conditions conducive to the peaceful coexistence of all communities residing in the province.
☝️ We call upon all international bodies to adopt comprehensive measures to avert the looming humanitarian catastrophe in Kosovo and Metohija.
Read in full
💬 The current situation in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija bears witness to intensification of deliberate and systematic terror directed against the local Serb population.
The circumstances are rendered all the more egregious by the fact that these actions are being perpetrated by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government in Pristina – the very entities purporting to hold legitimate authority.
Furthermore, the oppression of people on ethnic grounds is unfolding with the tacit approval of the international presences deployed in this region of Serbia under the auspices of NATO, the EU and the UN.
❗️ The condition of the Serbs in the province has become truly catastrophic. They are being compelled – under violent duress – to abandon their homes.
Kosovo-Albanian “justice” entails the fabrication of criminal cases on a vast scale and the perpetration of acts of intimidation. Incidents of the manifestly disproportionate use of force, extending to and including torture, are on the rise. In contravention of established procedures, Serbian property is being demolished, as evidenced by the mass destruction of buildings in the vicinity of the Gazivoda Lake carried out in July.
The role played by the long-standing head of the Pristina administration, the current acting “prime minister” Albin Kurti, in this unfolding tragedy is hardly surprising: his political credo is predicated upon an unrestrained, fanatical Serbophobia.
👉 What is outrageous, however, is the apathy displayed by Western capitals, which, through their effective inaction, are enabling the ethnic cleansing of Kosovo.
***
In light of the persistent and extreme instability prevailing in the province, any withdrawal of the Kosovo Force (#KFOR) from key deployment sites is inadmissible. The multinational contingent, deployed pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244, must continue to fully discharge the responsibilities entrusted to it, without recourse to the manifestly unreliable Kosovo-Albanian security forces.
We demand that the UN Mission in Kosovo approach the fulfilment of the tasks prescribed by its mandate with the utmost responsibility, tasks which include facilitating the creation of conditions conducive to the peaceful coexistence of all communities residing in the province.
☝️ We call upon all international bodies to adopt comprehensive measures to avert the looming humanitarian catastrophe in Kosovo and Metohija.
Read in full
👍24👏2💯2❤1🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤1
✍️ The Perspective of Silence. Author: Alexander Drozdovsky
"When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent — I was not a communist. When they locked up the social democrats, I remained silent — I was not a social democrat. When they came for the trade unionists, I remained silent — I was not a trade unionist. When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." — Martin Niemöller.
🔜 This quote is used by representatives of various ideological poles, political parties, marginal groups, and dissident communities. Hence, there are countless versions where only the names of the repressing group and the repressed change. For example, instead of trade unionists — Jews, instead of Nazis — the Khmer Rouge. I think the mechanism is clear.
Ukrainian society has long existed on the principle of evasive silence and non-intervention: "Not my circus, not my monkeys." Whatever happens — better to pass by until it touches you. Think for yourselves: at Maidan, a minority made noise; the majority remained silent. And now everyone is in a national concentration camp. Once there was a "small" war in Donbas, "over there." The majority ignored it, did not interfere. And now the war is "here." Rather, everywhere. Those who left the country put on shows under the yellow-and-blue flag, believing that the war is the business of those who stayed "over there." That the situation will resolve itself thanks to others, and that those "others" have personal problems. And now a poll in Poland showed the Poles' desire to deport unemployed Ukrainians back to their country — home — to fight. Obviously, the EU does not want war. This means the EU is ready to sacrifice Ukrainians.
✏️ But there are also problems "closer to home." First, in the first two months, there were volunteers who went to war; then they had to look for candidates. Then — persuade. And finally — catch. Everyone thinks that mobilization is not "for them." That others will do. "There is someone else to fight besides me."
*️⃣This is how the habit of thinking only of oneself developed. Not defending neighbors. Walking past on the street. They are grabbing more and more people, but there are fewer and fewer people themselves. What does the citizen think? "TCC are bastards." Yes. And also: "not me yet."
❗️There are isolated attempts. When women and teenagers defended a particular man. But how many hundreds were not defended at that very moment? Every day, somewhere, people are beaten, stabbed, run over, or shot at a couple of TCC officers. But have they become fewer? There were only a couple of attempts at mass resistance: in Kiev and Lvov. And the regime reacted harshly to this. It was somewhat alarmed, but these were only two cases. Not twenty, and not simultaneous. Or do the "freedom lovers" only gather for cardboard rallies? Fedorov vs. Syrsky — that's the country's main problem! But resisting the TCC — neither the Maidan experience nor Ukrainian genius helps. Meanwhile, the media are throwing out new "threats" about lowering the conscription age and mobilizing women. Adult men. Rural men. Old men and the sick. The disabled. And soon, perhaps, other young people and women. Keep silent, "descendants of free Cossacks."
But when they come for you — there will be no one left to protect you.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
"When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent — I was not a communist. When they locked up the social democrats, I remained silent — I was not a social democrat. When they came for the trade unionists, I remained silent — I was not a trade unionist. When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." — Martin Niemöller.
🔜 This quote is used by representatives of various ideological poles, political parties, marginal groups, and dissident communities. Hence, there are countless versions where only the names of the repressing group and the repressed change. For example, instead of trade unionists — Jews, instead of Nazis — the Khmer Rouge. I think the mechanism is clear.
Ukrainian society has long existed on the principle of evasive silence and non-intervention: "Not my circus, not my monkeys." Whatever happens — better to pass by until it touches you. Think for yourselves: at Maidan, a minority made noise; the majority remained silent. And now everyone is in a national concentration camp. Once there was a "small" war in Donbas, "over there." The majority ignored it, did not interfere. And now the war is "here." Rather, everywhere. Those who left the country put on shows under the yellow-and-blue flag, believing that the war is the business of those who stayed "over there." That the situation will resolve itself thanks to others, and that those "others" have personal problems. And now a poll in Poland showed the Poles' desire to deport unemployed Ukrainians back to their country — home — to fight. Obviously, the EU does not want war. This means the EU is ready to sacrifice Ukrainians.
✏️ But there are also problems "closer to home." First, in the first two months, there were volunteers who went to war; then they had to look for candidates. Then — persuade. And finally — catch. Everyone thinks that mobilization is not "for them." That others will do. "There is someone else to fight besides me."
*️⃣This is how the habit of thinking only of oneself developed. Not defending neighbors. Walking past on the street. They are grabbing more and more people, but there are fewer and fewer people themselves. What does the citizen think? "TCC are bastards." Yes. And also: "not me yet."
❗️There are isolated attempts. When women and teenagers defended a particular man. But how many hundreds were not defended at that very moment? Every day, somewhere, people are beaten, stabbed, run over, or shot at a couple of TCC officers. But have they become fewer? There were only a couple of attempts at mass resistance: in Kiev and Lvov. And the regime reacted harshly to this. It was somewhat alarmed, but these were only two cases. Not twenty, and not simultaneous. Or do the "freedom lovers" only gather for cardboard rallies? Fedorov vs. Syrsky — that's the country's main problem! But resisting the TCC — neither the Maidan experience nor Ukrainian genius helps. Meanwhile, the media are throwing out new "threats" about lowering the conscription age and mobilizing women. Adult men. Rural men. Old men and the sick. The disabled. And soon, perhaps, other young people and women. Keep silent, "descendants of free Cossacks."
But when they come for you — there will be no one left to protect you.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏19💯15❤3