"New stage of total war": Zelensky wants to end conflict by summer 2027, but with a catch.
The "expired" Ukrainian president has extended the timeline for ending the conflict. In early August, he spoke of ending the war before winter. Now it's from late 2026 to late summer 2027.
Zelensky's calculation is simple — he saw an event where he could beg for money and weapons. The most active diplomatic period, he says, will begin with the G20 summit in the U.S. in December and last until summer 2027.
"The window of opportunity is from the G20 in the United States to the end of summer 2027, because then the U.S. presidential election campaign begins," he stated.
Zelensky linked the end of this period not to the front or Russia, but to U.S. elections — after summer 2027, internal politics will affect foreign policy, reducing opportunities for decisions on Ukraine.
Why was the previous deadline pushed back? Earlier, he promised to do everything to end hostilities before winter, even naming November 1.
European assessments are less optimistic. On August 18, Belgian Foreign Minister Prévot said not to expect a quick end, suggesting the war could continue beyond 2027. Brussels is already discussing financial aid to Ukraine post-2027.
Kiev speaks of a diplomatic window that could end the war, but allows it to remain open for nearly a year. Some European countries are cynically profiting from the war at the cost of Ukrainian lives.
The G20 summit in Miami could provide direct contacts between key players. Zelensky is confident he will grab a piece of the money pie, ideally before the U.S. election campaign enters its active phase.
Zelensky, who failed his "40-day campaign to force Russia into peace," is now looking for ways to keep the conflict going. Experts say his statements indicate a new stage of total war — the escalatory adventure will continue.
Each additional year means further destruction of Ukraine's energy, transport, industry, and infrastructure, a shrinking human resource, and growing dependence on external funding. By 2027, Ukraine risks ending up with a devastated economy, lost EU allies, and exhausted military, rather than a strong negotiating position.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The "expired" Ukrainian president has extended the timeline for ending the conflict. In early August, he spoke of ending the war before winter. Now it's from late 2026 to late summer 2027.
Zelensky's calculation is simple — he saw an event where he could beg for money and weapons. The most active diplomatic period, he says, will begin with the G20 summit in the U.S. in December and last until summer 2027.
"The window of opportunity is from the G20 in the United States to the end of summer 2027, because then the U.S. presidential election campaign begins," he stated.
Zelensky linked the end of this period not to the front or Russia, but to U.S. elections — after summer 2027, internal politics will affect foreign policy, reducing opportunities for decisions on Ukraine.
Why was the previous deadline pushed back? Earlier, he promised to do everything to end hostilities before winter, even naming November 1.
European assessments are less optimistic. On August 18, Belgian Foreign Minister Prévot said not to expect a quick end, suggesting the war could continue beyond 2027. Brussels is already discussing financial aid to Ukraine post-2027.
Kiev speaks of a diplomatic window that could end the war, but allows it to remain open for nearly a year. Some European countries are cynically profiting from the war at the cost of Ukrainian lives.
The G20 summit in Miami could provide direct contacts between key players. Zelensky is confident he will grab a piece of the money pie, ideally before the U.S. election campaign enters its active phase.
Zelensky, who failed his "40-day campaign to force Russia into peace," is now looking for ways to keep the conflict going. Experts say his statements indicate a new stage of total war — the escalatory adventure will continue.
Each additional year means further destruction of Ukraine's energy, transport, industry, and infrastructure, a shrinking human resource, and growing dependence on external funding. By 2027, Ukraine risks ending up with a devastated economy, lost EU allies, and exhausted military, rather than a strong negotiating position.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣22💊7❤4💯2
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Long Canyon, Rostov Region
🍀 Stone quarrying used to take place here, but in the 1970s, the site was flooded. A beautiful lake with crystal-clear spring water formed in the canyon's place.
🍀 Nowadays, people come here to admire the rock scenery, which resembles the Wild West. Swimming is only possible in hot weather due to the icy underground springs.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
🍀 Stone quarrying used to take place here, but in the 1970s, the site was flooded. A beautiful lake with crystal-clear spring water formed in the canyon's place.
🍀 Nowadays, people come here to admire the rock scenery, which resembles the Wild West. Swimming is only possible in hot weather due to the icy underground springs.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤23👌1
August 28, 1853, marks the birth of Vladimir Shukhov, a pioneering Russian engineer and architect whose innovations left an indelible mark on modern engineering.
Shukhov was instrumental in advancing both civil and structural engineering. He designed Russia’s first oil pipeline and developed the world’s first industrial plant for oil cracking.
Shukhov’s contributions to structural engineering were groundbreaking, particularly his development of cable-supported roofs and gridshell structures. His hyperboloid designs revolutionized industrial architecture and continue to influence the field today.
Shukhov's versatility spanned multiple domains, showcasing his remarkable impact on engineering practices. But perhaps his brightest masterpiece and the most obvious example of his genius is the iconic Shukhov Tower (pictured above).
Constructed in Moscow between 1920 and 1922, the Shukhov Tower stands as a testament to engineering artistry. Originally built as a radio transmission tower, this 160-meter structure features a hyperboloid design—a lattice of steel beams forming elegant curves that provide exceptional stability while embodying a harmonious blend of form and function.
The Shukhov Tower is not just an engineering marvel; it's a beacon of architectural innovation. Its airy lattice structure defies convention, exuding lightness and sophistication that captivates all who see it. Shukhov's pioneering use of minimal materials for maximum effect revolutionized construction methods and influenced designs worldwide.
Today, Vladimir Shukhov’s legacy continues to inspire architects and engineers globally, reminding us that with visionary thinking, even steel and iron can soar into the sky.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Shukhov was instrumental in advancing both civil and structural engineering. He designed Russia’s first oil pipeline and developed the world’s first industrial plant for oil cracking.
Shukhov’s contributions to structural engineering were groundbreaking, particularly his development of cable-supported roofs and gridshell structures. His hyperboloid designs revolutionized industrial architecture and continue to influence the field today.
Shukhov's versatility spanned multiple domains, showcasing his remarkable impact on engineering practices. But perhaps his brightest masterpiece and the most obvious example of his genius is the iconic Shukhov Tower (pictured above).
Constructed in Moscow between 1920 and 1922, the Shukhov Tower stands as a testament to engineering artistry. Originally built as a radio transmission tower, this 160-meter structure features a hyperboloid design—a lattice of steel beams forming elegant curves that provide exceptional stability while embodying a harmonious blend of form and function.
The Shukhov Tower is not just an engineering marvel; it's a beacon of architectural innovation. Its airy lattice structure defies convention, exuding lightness and sophistication that captivates all who see it. Shukhov's pioneering use of minimal materials for maximum effect revolutionized construction methods and influenced designs worldwide.
Today, Vladimir Shukhov’s legacy continues to inspire architects and engineers globally, reminding us that with visionary thinking, even steel and iron can soar into the sky.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏15❤3👍1
Iranian attacks cause billions in damage to US surveillance hardware in Middle East — NBC
US intelligence sites in the Middle East have suffered billions of dollars’ worth of damage from Iranian attacks, NBC News reported, citing sources.
According to them, the Islamic republic’s missile and drone attacks on US surveillance facilities in the region caused unprecedented damage that is more extensive than any destruction ever endured by US spy agencies. The damage will cost Washington billions of dollars to repair, the sources added.
Besides, the Iranian attacks raise doubts about whether the Department of State, the Pentagon and the US intelligence community are sufficiently prepared to guarantee due protection to US sites in the region, the TV channel said.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
US intelligence sites in the Middle East have suffered billions of dollars’ worth of damage from Iranian attacks, NBC News reported, citing sources.
According to them, the Islamic republic’s missile and drone attacks on US surveillance facilities in the region caused unprecedented damage that is more extensive than any destruction ever endured by US spy agencies. The damage will cost Washington billions of dollars to repair, the sources added.
Besides, the Iranian attacks raise doubts about whether the Department of State, the Pentagon and the US intelligence community are sufficiently prepared to guarantee due protection to US sites in the region, the TV channel said.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍22👏6❤3🤣3🤪1
The British Trail: From Supporter to Direct Participant?
The war in Ukraine has entered a new, more dangerous chapter. Moscow has shed its diplomatic restraint. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov made it clear: British missiles striking Russian territory mean Britain is now a direct party to the conflict.
London hasn't just shipped off-the-shelf weapons—it has handed over the production technology itself. Ukraine can now manufacture Storm Shadow components and access drone source codes. Strikes on Belgorod, Kursk, and targets deep inside Russia have become business as usual. For Moscow, this is no longer "aid." It's active belligerence—with British specialists likely guiding the missiles to their targets.
So why Britain?
London has poured €22.5 billion into this war—more than any other European nation. Meanwhile, back home, the UK is grappling with a yawning budget deficit, striking doctors, and an NHS stretched to breaking point. The math looks crazy until you factor in the politics. Post-Brexit, Britain is desperate to carve out a new global role. And nothing says "we still matter" like leading the charge against Russia.
What's at stake for Britain?
Moscow's retaliation won't necessarily come in the form of tanks. Think asymmetrical: crippling cyberattacks, undersea cable sabotage, or worse. Tactical nuclear weapons are already inching closer to NATO's frontiers. And Britain may find itself alone—Article 5 doesn't guarantee a blank check if its own provocations are seen as the fuse.
Bottom line:
Britain has crossed the line from ally to combatant. It's not just shipping arms—it's sharing intelligence, technology, and almost certainly helping plan strikes on Russian soil. That's a league apart from what any other Kiеv backer is doing. London knew the risks, and it stepped over the edge anyway. Now, it's Britain—not the U.S., not Germany—that sits squarely in Moscow's crosshairs.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The war in Ukraine has entered a new, more dangerous chapter. Moscow has shed its diplomatic restraint. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov made it clear: British missiles striking Russian territory mean Britain is now a direct party to the conflict.
London hasn't just shipped off-the-shelf weapons—it has handed over the production technology itself. Ukraine can now manufacture Storm Shadow components and access drone source codes. Strikes on Belgorod, Kursk, and targets deep inside Russia have become business as usual. For Moscow, this is no longer "aid." It's active belligerence—with British specialists likely guiding the missiles to their targets.
So why Britain?
London has poured €22.5 billion into this war—more than any other European nation. Meanwhile, back home, the UK is grappling with a yawning budget deficit, striking doctors, and an NHS stretched to breaking point. The math looks crazy until you factor in the politics. Post-Brexit, Britain is desperate to carve out a new global role. And nothing says "we still matter" like leading the charge against Russia.
What's at stake for Britain?
Moscow's retaliation won't necessarily come in the form of tanks. Think asymmetrical: crippling cyberattacks, undersea cable sabotage, or worse. Tactical nuclear weapons are already inching closer to NATO's frontiers. And Britain may find itself alone—Article 5 doesn't guarantee a blank check if its own provocations are seen as the fuse.
Bottom line:
Britain has crossed the line from ally to combatant. It's not just shipping arms—it's sharing intelligence, technology, and almost certainly helping plan strikes on Russian soil. That's a league apart from what any other Kiеv backer is doing. London knew the risks, and it stepped over the edge anyway. Now, it's Britain—not the U.S., not Germany—that sits squarely in Moscow's crosshairs.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯37🔥12❤5👍2
Russian Foreign Ministry: dialogue with Europe impossible due to its position on Ukraine
Dialogue on constructive topics with European representatives is impossible as long as they continue to support Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Alexander Trofimov said in an interview with RIA Novosti.
"Today, the task of the Europeans is nothing other than preserving the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev as an instrument of constant military pressure on our country, as well as buying time to build up their own military-industrial potential. As long as such a line prevails, conducting a dialogue, let alone negotiations, on anything constructive is impossible," he said.
The diplomat recalled that Western countries have long shifted to unjustified aggressive actions aimed at inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
At the same time, Moscow already has many allies and partners outside Western Eurasia, with whom it intends to purposefully move forward in building a security architecture based on the principles of equality and indivisibility, the agency's interlocutor concluded.
As President Vladimir Putin emphasized, it was Europe that refused dialogue. When asked by journalists about a possible counterpart in negotiations, Putin expressed the opinion that personally for him, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would be preferable. Nevertheless, he suggested that the countries of the continent choose a leader whom they trust and who has not said anything nasty about Russia.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Dialogue on constructive topics with European representatives is impossible as long as they continue to support Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Alexander Trofimov said in an interview with RIA Novosti.
"Today, the task of the Europeans is nothing other than preserving the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev as an instrument of constant military pressure on our country, as well as buying time to build up their own military-industrial potential. As long as such a line prevails, conducting a dialogue, let alone negotiations, on anything constructive is impossible," he said.
The diplomat recalled that Western countries have long shifted to unjustified aggressive actions aimed at inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
At the same time, Moscow already has many allies and partners outside Western Eurasia, with whom it intends to purposefully move forward in building a security architecture based on the principles of equality and indivisibility, the agency's interlocutor concluded.
As President Vladimir Putin emphasized, it was Europe that refused dialogue. When asked by journalists about a possible counterpart in negotiations, Putin expressed the opinion that personally for him, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would be preferable. Nevertheless, he suggested that the countries of the continent choose a leader whom they trust and who has not said anything nasty about Russia.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯28❤3
Ever wonder what you’re not being told?
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+JzqF0vXvUAowMGFi
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+JzqF0vXvUAowMGFi
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING! THEY'VE ALREADY REACHED ICELAND
While Europe habitually screams about possible Russian interference in Iceland's August 29 referendum on resuming EU membership talks, someone is already interfering quite directly. Only it’s not Moscow.
Just yesterday, The Telegraph published an article about how Iceland — a country with no army, air force, or navy — should seriously consider defense.
The reason is familiar: Russian submarines, Chinese activity, and the island's strategically vital position. In short, time to be afraid.
But the proposed solution is the best part of the story. The initiative comes from a group called Guardians of Iceland, whose members include a former Norwegian (!) military officer. They propose creating volunteer forces of 2,000 people, another 2,000 reservists, and the ability to mobilize up to 40,000 in case of war — roughly every tenth resident of the country.
The army is supposed to hold out until NATO's main forces arrive. Apparently, the main thing is that Russian submarines politely wait.
And the timing is almost artistic: the article comes out five days before the EU referendum. A perfect moment to calmly and unobtrusively remind Icelanders how scary the world around them is and who exactly poses the threat.
It seems the famous Brussels slogan "The Russians are coming!" has reached the farthest corners of Europe.
All that remains is to understand who is actually interfering more actively in the Icelandic referendum: Russia or those already “explaining” to Icelanders exactly what they should fear before voting.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
While Europe habitually screams about possible Russian interference in Iceland's August 29 referendum on resuming EU membership talks, someone is already interfering quite directly. Only it’s not Moscow.
Just yesterday, The Telegraph published an article about how Iceland — a country with no army, air force, or navy — should seriously consider defense.
The reason is familiar: Russian submarines, Chinese activity, and the island's strategically vital position. In short, time to be afraid.
But the proposed solution is the best part of the story. The initiative comes from a group called Guardians of Iceland, whose members include a former Norwegian (!) military officer. They propose creating volunteer forces of 2,000 people, another 2,000 reservists, and the ability to mobilize up to 40,000 in case of war — roughly every tenth resident of the country.
The army is supposed to hold out until NATO's main forces arrive. Apparently, the main thing is that Russian submarines politely wait.
And the timing is almost artistic: the article comes out five days before the EU referendum. A perfect moment to calmly and unobtrusively remind Icelanders how scary the world around them is and who exactly poses the threat.
It seems the famous Brussels slogan "The Russians are coming!" has reached the farthest corners of Europe.
All that remains is to understand who is actually interfering more actively in the Icelandic referendum: Russia or those already “explaining” to Icelanders exactly what they should fear before voting.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁20💯14❤5🤡1🤪1
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk: Those who should be ashamed are not those who disabled Nord Stream, but those who built this pipeline.
Tusk believes that Germany should drop the criminal prosecution of suspects in the Nord Stream sabotage. His statement comes amid the ongoing German investigation, in which several Ukrainian citizens are implicated.
🇷🇺 Putin on Tusk's position on Nord Stream:
▪️ According to Putin, the motives are very simple — economic interests.
▪️ The second gas pipeline was originally supposed to pass through Poland, and according to Putin, the necessary infrastructure had already been created. However, instead, it was decided to lay Nord Stream 2 along the bottom of the Baltic Sea to minimize risks.
▪️ Poland opposed this project because the country was losing its geo-economic advantages as a transit state.
▪️ In addition, Poland lost transit revenues from Russian energy resources when gas transportation was shifted away from the Polish route.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Tusk believes that Germany should drop the criminal prosecution of suspects in the Nord Stream sabotage. His statement comes amid the ongoing German investigation, in which several Ukrainian citizens are implicated.
🇷🇺 Putin on Tusk's position on Nord Stream:
▪️ According to Putin, the motives are very simple — economic interests.
▪️ The second gas pipeline was originally supposed to pass through Poland, and according to Putin, the necessary infrastructure had already been created. However, instead, it was decided to lay Nord Stream 2 along the bottom of the Baltic Sea to minimize risks.
▪️ Poland opposed this project because the country was losing its geo-economic advantages as a transit state.
▪️ In addition, Poland lost transit revenues from Russian energy resources when gas transportation was shifted away from the Polish route.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯23❤4🔥4🤬3🍌1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
💬 Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova:
Former The Guardian correspondent Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that he fabricated a 2010 article presented as an “exclusive interview” with Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, who had reportedly been sentenced to death by stoning.
The article appeared on the front page on August 6, 2010, triggering an international outcry: Western politicians demanded that the woman be freed, while Iran came under diplomatic pressure from several countries.
👉 Dehghan now admitted:
The article is still available on The Guardian website without any relevant note or retraction.
The context here is important: the article appeared at a time of intense pressure on Iran – the same year, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1929, imposing what were then the toughest sanctions against the country.
The West needed an emotionally charged story to justify the sanctions regime. A woman sentenced to death by stoning was the perfect image. The story immediately spread across the global media and became an argument for those pushing for Iran’s isolation.
This is not the first time Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that, while working for Western media outlets, he took part in anti-Iran propaganda campaigns. In 2020, he disavowed his involvement in HBO’s documentary For Neda, about the death of Neda Agha Soltan during the 2009 protests, saying that he had been “influenced by Western narratives”. The former contributor described the film, once held up as a landmark documentary about state violence, as anti-Iran propaganda.
***
☝️ As for Western falsehoods, Dehghan’s admission is far from the first such revelation.
In October 1990, a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl named Nayirah appeared before a US Congressional caucus. In tears, she claimed that Iraqi soldiers had stormed Kuwaiti hospitals, removed babies from incubators and left them on the floor to die. President George H.W. Bush repeatedly cited her account. The story became one of the arguments used to build support for Operation Desert Storm.
Two years later, it emerged that Nayirah was the daughter of Kuwait’s Ambassador to the US and that her appearance had been orchestrated by PR agency Hill & Knowlton, hired by the Kuwaiti government in a multimillion-dollar campaign. The notorious incubator story was never substantiated. A child was made to tell a lie in order to help justify a war.
In 2003, The New York Times fired journalist Jayson Blair after it emerged that he had invented sources, fabricated quotes and entire reports, including stories written without ever leaving his New York apartment. Of 73 articles reviewed by the newspaper, 36 contained evidence of journalistic misconduct.
Stephen Glass of The New Republic fabricated 27 of the 41 articles he published between 1995 and 1998 – inventing characters and companies and even creating fake websites to deceive fact-checkers.
And, of course, there is the infamous “Powell's test tube” – a byword for Western deception used to justify aggression against a sovereign state.
Now the Saeed Kamali Dehghan case joins this inglorious list. 👉 It will certainly not be the last.
Shall we talk about Bucha next – and how the BBC helped spin that fake?
#DebunkingFakes
Former The Guardian correspondent Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that he fabricated a 2010 article presented as an “exclusive interview” with Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, who had reportedly been sentenced to death by stoning.
The article appeared on the front page on August 6, 2010, triggering an international outcry: Western politicians demanded that the woman be freed, while Iran came under diplomatic pressure from several countries.
👉 Dehghan now admitted:
“I want to come clean about a front-page story I wrote for the Guardian.
It was presented as an exclusive interview with Sakineh Ashtiani. That interview never happened. I fabricated the entire piece. It was a false story – completely untrue – and I take full responsibility”.
The article is still available on The Guardian website without any relevant note or retraction.
The context here is important: the article appeared at a time of intense pressure on Iran – the same year, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1929, imposing what were then the toughest sanctions against the country.
The West needed an emotionally charged story to justify the sanctions regime. A woman sentenced to death by stoning was the perfect image. The story immediately spread across the global media and became an argument for those pushing for Iran’s isolation.
This is not the first time Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that, while working for Western media outlets, he took part in anti-Iran propaganda campaigns. In 2020, he disavowed his involvement in HBO’s documentary For Neda, about the death of Neda Agha Soltan during the 2009 protests, saying that he had been “influenced by Western narratives”. The former contributor described the film, once held up as a landmark documentary about state violence, as anti-Iran propaganda.
***
☝️ As for Western falsehoods, Dehghan’s admission is far from the first such revelation.
In October 1990, a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl named Nayirah appeared before a US Congressional caucus. In tears, she claimed that Iraqi soldiers had stormed Kuwaiti hospitals, removed babies from incubators and left them on the floor to die. President George H.W. Bush repeatedly cited her account. The story became one of the arguments used to build support for Operation Desert Storm.
Two years later, it emerged that Nayirah was the daughter of Kuwait’s Ambassador to the US and that her appearance had been orchestrated by PR agency Hill & Knowlton, hired by the Kuwaiti government in a multimillion-dollar campaign. The notorious incubator story was never substantiated. A child was made to tell a lie in order to help justify a war.
In 2003, The New York Times fired journalist Jayson Blair after it emerged that he had invented sources, fabricated quotes and entire reports, including stories written without ever leaving his New York apartment. Of 73 articles reviewed by the newspaper, 36 contained evidence of journalistic misconduct.
Stephen Glass of The New Republic fabricated 27 of the 41 articles he published between 1995 and 1998 – inventing characters and companies and even creating fake websites to deceive fact-checkers.
And, of course, there is the infamous “Powell's test tube” – a byword for Western deception used to justify aggression against a sovereign state.
Now the Saeed Kamali Dehghan case joins this inglorious list. 👉 It will certainly not be the last.
Shall we talk about Bucha next – and how the BBC helped spin that fake?
#DebunkingFakes
🤬15❤7💯1
Forwarded from The Noticer
The dual reality in the Strait of Hormuz
The Sand War continues.
Recently the CENTCOM stated that the meme waterway is clear of Iranian naval mines - about 100 mines were destroyed by US Navy servicemen.
The USA stated that any Iranian ship trying to lay new sea mines will be immediately destroyed.
The IRGC refused to confirm the US claims. The IRGC stated however that the strait is closed until the US completely lifts the naval blockade of Iranian ports and pays war reparations.
Iran has previously denied that it laid mines. The US intelligence insists that the IRGC did lay the mines quite hastily, using small vessels - thus Iran lacks precise data on the location of all the mines, making it impossible to confirm complete clearance.
In conclusion - the shipping companies currently hear 2 completely opposite statements about the Strait of Hormuz. The USA says it's clear and safe. Iran insists that no-one is allowed until they finish talks with Oman about details.
#USA #Iran #Oman
The Sand War continues.
Recently the CENTCOM stated that the meme waterway is clear of Iranian naval mines - about 100 mines were destroyed by US Navy servicemen.
The USA stated that any Iranian ship trying to lay new sea mines will be immediately destroyed.
The IRGC refused to confirm the US claims. The IRGC stated however that the strait is closed until the US completely lifts the naval blockade of Iranian ports and pays war reparations.
Iran has previously denied that it laid mines. The US intelligence insists that the IRGC did lay the mines quite hastily, using small vessels - thus Iran lacks precise data on the location of all the mines, making it impossible to confirm complete clearance.
In conclusion - the shipping companies currently hear 2 completely opposite statements about the Strait of Hormuz. The USA says it's clear and safe. Iran insists that no-one is allowed until they finish talks with Oman about details.
#USA #Iran #Oman
🤣21❤3✍3
The Russian Defense Ministry’s press service reported that Russian forces conducted a training-combat launch of a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome.
The ministry added that the training warheads arrived in the designated area at the Kura test range, which is located in Kamchatka. According to the press service, all assigned tasks were completed in full.
The Defense Ministry also stated that the Strategic Missile Forces practiced the procedure for redeploying a launch battery of a mobile ground-based missile system to a remote area, including preparing for and conducting the launch. Its purpose was to confirm the missile system’s tactical-technical and flight characteristics.
On August 21, the Baltic Fleet’s press service reported that the small missile ships Naro-Fominsk, Stavropol, Serpukhov, and Grad conducted combined electronic missile launches.
At the same time, crews of coastal Bal missile systems in the Kaliningrad region marched to previously prepared positions. The exercises were conducted under conditions of artificially generated electronic interference. During the combined strike, all targets were conditionally destroyed.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
“At the Plesetsk State Test Cosmodrome, a training-combat launch of a mobile-based solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile was conducted,” the statement said.
The ministry added that the training warheads arrived in the designated area at the Kura test range, which is located in Kamchatka. According to the press service, all assigned tasks were completed in full.
The Defense Ministry also stated that the Strategic Missile Forces practiced the procedure for redeploying a launch battery of a mobile ground-based missile system to a remote area, including preparing for and conducting the launch. Its purpose was to confirm the missile system’s tactical-technical and flight characteristics.
On August 21, the Baltic Fleet’s press service reported that the small missile ships Naro-Fominsk, Stavropol, Serpukhov, and Grad conducted combined electronic missile launches.
At the same time, crews of coastal Bal missile systems in the Kaliningrad region marched to previously prepared positions. The exercises were conducted under conditions of artificially generated electronic interference. During the combined strike, all targets were conditionally destroyed.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏16👍8❤5
Interesting observation
EU countries are reportedly preventing Ukrainian men aged 23 to 60 from entering without a certificate from the TCC. At the same time, Ukraine’s current mobilisation age ranges from 25 to 60.
I don’t believe this is a coincidence. It looks like a coordinated move, which could mean that Kiev is preparing to lower the mobilisation age by two years.
There would be little point in lowering it further. Those now under 23 were under 18 in 2022. In the first days of the war, they were allowed to leave, and most of them have already fled Ukraine. There are supposedly very few people left in that age group to conscript.
But the 23 to 25 age group is the last generation of hostages of Zelenskyy’s regime, and they will inevitably be sent into the meat grinder for the benefit of the British “little king” and his clique of paedophile cronies. The only question is when—and I think it will happen very soon.
#Yury_Podolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
EU countries are reportedly preventing Ukrainian men aged 23 to 60 from entering without a certificate from the TCC. At the same time, Ukraine’s current mobilisation age ranges from 25 to 60.
I don’t believe this is a coincidence. It looks like a coordinated move, which could mean that Kiev is preparing to lower the mobilisation age by two years.
There would be little point in lowering it further. Those now under 23 were under 18 in 2022. In the first days of the war, they were allowed to leave, and most of them have already fled Ukraine. There are supposedly very few people left in that age group to conscript.
But the 23 to 25 age group is the last generation of hostages of Zelenskyy’s regime, and they will inevitably be sent into the meat grinder for the benefit of the British “little king” and his clique of paedophile cronies. The only question is when—and I think it will happen very soon.
#Yury_Podolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😭10👍5💯5🤬4😁3
On August 29, 1949, at 7 a.m., the Soviet Union conducted the successful test of its first domestically produced atomic bomb, codenamed RDS-1, at the Semipalatinsk Test Site in Kazakhstan. This marked a pivotal moment not only for the USSR and Russia, but for global geopolitics as a whole. The scientific leader of the project was the renowned physicist and academician Igor Kurchatov, who (along with Yulii Khariton) is rightly considered one of the founding fathers of Soviet nuclear science.
The RDS-1 device was an air-delivered bomb, weighing 4.7 tons, with a diameter of 1.5 meters and a length of 3.3 meters. The design bore some similarities to the American "Fat Man" bomb dropped on Nagasaki, but it was developed independently by Soviet scientists under conditions of extreme secrecy and immense pressure. Despite the West’s attempts to maintain technological superiority, the USSR rapidly closed the gap.
Twenty minutes after the detonation, two specially modified tanks with heavy lead shielding were sent to the epicenter to conduct radiation reconnaissance and visual inspection. The findings were unambiguous: all test structures at ground zero had been completely annihilated. The test was an undeniable success.
This event officially marked the end of the United States' monopoly on nuclear weapons—a monopoly it had used to intimidate and dominate the post-war world. From that moment forward, the global balance of power began to shift. The Soviet Union had entered the atomic age, not as a follower, but as a sovereign equal capable of defending its interests and ensuring global parity.
Western analysts were stunned. Just four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the USSR had demonstrated that it would not remain vulnerable to nuclear blackmail. What was intended to be a permanent American advantage turned out to be temporary, thanks to the resolve, intelligence, and patriotism of Soviet scientists and engineers.
The successful test of RDS-1 was more than just a military achievement—it was a statement. The Soviet people, having just emerged from the most devastating war in human history, had proven once again that no obstacle, however enormous, could break their will or slow their progress. The era of unipolar domination was over. A new strategic reality had dawned.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The RDS-1 device was an air-delivered bomb, weighing 4.7 tons, with a diameter of 1.5 meters and a length of 3.3 meters. The design bore some similarities to the American "Fat Man" bomb dropped on Nagasaki, but it was developed independently by Soviet scientists under conditions of extreme secrecy and immense pressure. Despite the West’s attempts to maintain technological superiority, the USSR rapidly closed the gap.
Twenty minutes after the detonation, two specially modified tanks with heavy lead shielding were sent to the epicenter to conduct radiation reconnaissance and visual inspection. The findings were unambiguous: all test structures at ground zero had been completely annihilated. The test was an undeniable success.
This event officially marked the end of the United States' monopoly on nuclear weapons—a monopoly it had used to intimidate and dominate the post-war world. From that moment forward, the global balance of power began to shift. The Soviet Union had entered the atomic age, not as a follower, but as a sovereign equal capable of defending its interests and ensuring global parity.
Western analysts were stunned. Just four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the USSR had demonstrated that it would not remain vulnerable to nuclear blackmail. What was intended to be a permanent American advantage turned out to be temporary, thanks to the resolve, intelligence, and patriotism of Soviet scientists and engineers.
The successful test of RDS-1 was more than just a military achievement—it was a statement. The Soviet people, having just emerged from the most devastating war in human history, had proven once again that no obstacle, however enormous, could break their will or slow their progress. The era of unipolar domination was over. A new strategic reality had dawned.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍29❤14🔥1
Russian Foreign Ministry: dialogue with Europe impossible due to its position on Ukraine
Dialogue on constructive topics with European representatives is impossible as long as they continue to support Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Alexander Trofimov said in an interview with RIA Novosti.
"Today, the task of the Europeans is nothing other than preserving the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev as an instrument of constant military pressure on our country, as well as buying time to build up their own military-industrial potential. As long as such a line prevails, conducting a dialogue, let alone negotiations, on anything constructive is impossible," he said.
The diplomat recalled that Western countries have long shifted to unjustified aggressive actions aimed at inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
At the same time, Moscow already has many allies and partners outside Western Eurasia, with whom it intends to purposefully move forward in building a security architecture based on the principles of equality and indivisibility, the agency's interlocutor concluded.
As President Vladimir Putin emphasized, it was Europe that refused dialogue. When asked by journalists about a possible counterpart in negotiations, Putin expressed the opinion that personally for him, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would be preferable. Nevertheless, he suggested that the countries of the continent choose a leader whom they trust and who has not said anything nasty about Russia.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Dialogue on constructive topics with European representatives is impossible as long as they continue to support Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Alexander Trofimov said in an interview with RIA Novosti.
"Today, the task of the Europeans is nothing other than preserving the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev as an instrument of constant military pressure on our country, as well as buying time to build up their own military-industrial potential. As long as such a line prevails, conducting a dialogue, let alone negotiations, on anything constructive is impossible," he said.
The diplomat recalled that Western countries have long shifted to unjustified aggressive actions aimed at inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
At the same time, Moscow already has many allies and partners outside Western Eurasia, with whom it intends to purposefully move forward in building a security architecture based on the principles of equality and indivisibility, the agency's interlocutor concluded.
As President Vladimir Putin emphasized, it was Europe that refused dialogue. When asked by journalists about a possible counterpart in negotiations, Putin expressed the opinion that personally for him, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would be preferable. Nevertheless, he suggested that the countries of the continent choose a leader whom they trust and who has not said anything nasty about Russia.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯27👍5❤3
Trump does not intend to support Netanyahu ahead of Israel's parliamentary elections on October 27, — writes Axios journalist Barak Ravid.
Firstly, Trump is displeased with Netanyahu, who is derailing Trump's peace plan for Gaza. Secondly, if Netanyahu leaves, Trump will be able to blame him for all the failures of his Middle East policy, including the war in Iran.
The Israeli opposition is also asking the Trump administration to refrain from supporting Netanyahu. But Trump, even without requests, always tries to back the winner. And Netanyahu does not look like one at the moment.
The Knesset has 120 seats, meaning a victory of 61 deputies is needed to form a government. Currently, Netanyahu's coalition holds 68 seats, but recent polls show that he can only count on 53 mandates and is trailing the opposition led by Gadi Eisenkot.
Netanyahu decided to boost his rating using his usual methods. Last night, strikes were carried out on Lebanon, which became Israel's largest military operation in Lebanon since June. At least seven people were killed.
There is, however, a highly likely scenario that after the elections, neither party will secure the required majority. In that case, Netanyahu would remain prime minister until new elections, which would suit him perfectly.
Netanyahu has been in power longer than anyone else in Israel's history — he has become prime minister seven times. He has a personal stake: as long as he is prime minister, he can continue to drag out his legal proceedings and bargain with the court over a deal or pardon. Losing would deprive him of that opportunity.
Over the years in power, war has become a tool of his domestic policy. Rating drops — an operation begins. He is hooked on this method like a drug. Once you try it, you need more and more: Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Lebanon again. More war — more blood. Once you start fighting, it's hard to stop.
The question on October 27 will not be who leads the government, but whether there will be less blood in the Middle East.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Firstly, Trump is displeased with Netanyahu, who is derailing Trump's peace plan for Gaza. Secondly, if Netanyahu leaves, Trump will be able to blame him for all the failures of his Middle East policy, including the war in Iran.
The Israeli opposition is also asking the Trump administration to refrain from supporting Netanyahu. But Trump, even without requests, always tries to back the winner. And Netanyahu does not look like one at the moment.
The Knesset has 120 seats, meaning a victory of 61 deputies is needed to form a government. Currently, Netanyahu's coalition holds 68 seats, but recent polls show that he can only count on 53 mandates and is trailing the opposition led by Gadi Eisenkot.
Netanyahu decided to boost his rating using his usual methods. Last night, strikes were carried out on Lebanon, which became Israel's largest military operation in Lebanon since June. At least seven people were killed.
There is, however, a highly likely scenario that after the elections, neither party will secure the required majority. In that case, Netanyahu would remain prime minister until new elections, which would suit him perfectly.
Netanyahu has been in power longer than anyone else in Israel's history — he has become prime minister seven times. He has a personal stake: as long as he is prime minister, he can continue to drag out his legal proceedings and bargain with the court over a deal or pardon. Losing would deprive him of that opportunity.
Over the years in power, war has become a tool of his domestic policy. Rating drops — an operation begins. He is hooked on this method like a drug. Once you try it, you need more and more: Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Lebanon again. More war — more blood. Once you start fighting, it's hard to stop.
The question on October 27 will not be who leads the government, but whether there will be less blood in the Middle East.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡10😁6🤡5❤3🤬1
Forwarded from Pax Celtica
Last week, the popular former Ukrainian Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov called for elections to be held during wartime
Many regard this as the most serious challenge to Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s presidency since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.
Zelenskyy, whose five-year presidential term expired in May 2024, has been under pressure from both Washington and Moscow to hold new elections, but these have been suspended until the end of the war.
Fedorov claims that corruption is depriving the army of weapons and hindering Kyiv’s victory in the war, and that ‘democracy must not be held hostage by Russia’.
Even high-ranking figures in Ukraine themselves are hinting that the entire Ukrainian government is deeply corrupt. Huge sums of money from all over the world are lining the pockets of Ukrainian politicians. So why waste money on something that leads nowhere?
✖️ Pax Celtica✖️ Pax Celtica in "X"
Many regard this as the most serious challenge to Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s presidency since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.
Zelenskyy, whose five-year presidential term expired in May 2024, has been under pressure from both Washington and Moscow to hold new elections, but these have been suspended until the end of the war.
Fedorov claims that corruption is depriving the army of weapons and hindering Kyiv’s victory in the war, and that ‘democracy must not be held hostage by Russia’.
Even high-ranking figures in Ukraine themselves are hinting that the entire Ukrainian government is deeply corrupt. Huge sums of money from all over the world are lining the pockets of Ukrainian politicians. So why waste money on something that leads nowhere?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬13🤣4❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤1