⚡️⚡️⚡️The Next 40 Days of Zelensky
Part 1
Ahead of the record-breaking swarm of Banderite shit-drones launched at Russia’s Moscow region, many people missed another announcement by the expired "president" Zelensky—his latest promise of “forty days until Russia is crushed.”
He made the declaration at the gathering of the so-called Carpathian Eight (Ukraine, Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, Austria, and Serbia).
First, everyone got a glimpse of Ukraine’s financial reality. As the expired Zelensky put it, “Our budget is facing a deficit of cosmic proportions.”
Second, his proclamation of “forty days” in the war against Russia was met with plenty of skepticism—even by the Western tabloid propaganda rags most generously funded to support Kiev’s narrative.
Everyone expected hell to break loose across the Moscow region, but there was a catch.
Ukraine had spent an entire month stockpiling 1,500 drones. They were aimed at strategic targets in Moscow and the surrounding region, including the Moscow oil refinery and CHP-22 power plant. The raid relied on the same old tactic: overwhelm layered air defenses through sheer numbers. The only new element was the use of ten Flamingo cruise missiles.
The results of what was billed as the most powerful strike of the entire war were negligible. Fewer than ten drones actually reached their targets. Two shit-drones set fire to an oil refinery, while the rest slammed into apartment buildings. Tragically, civilians were killed.
So much for the “super raid.”
Now let’s look at where the Zelensky regime stands after its first “forty days.”
The picture is bleak.
The strategically important city of Orekhov in the Zaporozhye region has been almost completely taken by Russian forces. Dobropolye is now under operational encirclement. A pocket has formed near Bolshoy Burluk. Russian troops have pushed into the Slavyansk–Kramatorsk agglomeration.
Meanwhile, the Ukrainian counteroffensive near Krasny Liman, conducted under near-total media silence, has stalled out. With it died Kiev’s hope of restoring its spring and summer front-line positions in that sector. That counteroffensive was something Ukraine desperately needed in order to nullify the Kremlin’s ultimatum—the one allegedly delivered to Kiev by Trump’s “carrier pigeons” (Kushner and Witkoff).
The next chapter of big politics.
Trump had barely started talking again about an "energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine" when the expired Zelensky went on American television to say he would "discuss the issue with our partners."
Quite the brave little tailor, this Zelensky—deciding to cross Trump off the list of partners. Back in the day, the CIA supposedly bit people’s heads off for remarks like that, quite literally. Apparently, those days are gone.
Source: https://t.me/ist_nap
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Part 1
Ahead of the record-breaking swarm of Banderite shit-drones launched at Russia’s Moscow region, many people missed another announcement by the expired "president" Zelensky—his latest promise of “forty days until Russia is crushed.”
He made the declaration at the gathering of the so-called Carpathian Eight (Ukraine, Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, Austria, and Serbia).
First, everyone got a glimpse of Ukraine’s financial reality. As the expired Zelensky put it, “Our budget is facing a deficit of cosmic proportions.”
Second, his proclamation of “forty days” in the war against Russia was met with plenty of skepticism—even by the Western tabloid propaganda rags most generously funded to support Kiev’s narrative.
Everyone expected hell to break loose across the Moscow region, but there was a catch.
Ukraine had spent an entire month stockpiling 1,500 drones. They were aimed at strategic targets in Moscow and the surrounding region, including the Moscow oil refinery and CHP-22 power plant. The raid relied on the same old tactic: overwhelm layered air defenses through sheer numbers. The only new element was the use of ten Flamingo cruise missiles.
The results of what was billed as the most powerful strike of the entire war were negligible. Fewer than ten drones actually reached their targets. Two shit-drones set fire to an oil refinery, while the rest slammed into apartment buildings. Tragically, civilians were killed.
So much for the “super raid.”
Now let’s look at where the Zelensky regime stands after its first “forty days.”
The picture is bleak.
The strategically important city of Orekhov in the Zaporozhye region has been almost completely taken by Russian forces. Dobropolye is now under operational encirclement. A pocket has formed near Bolshoy Burluk. Russian troops have pushed into the Slavyansk–Kramatorsk agglomeration.
Meanwhile, the Ukrainian counteroffensive near Krasny Liman, conducted under near-total media silence, has stalled out. With it died Kiev’s hope of restoring its spring and summer front-line positions in that sector. That counteroffensive was something Ukraine desperately needed in order to nullify the Kremlin’s ultimatum—the one allegedly delivered to Kiev by Trump’s “carrier pigeons” (Kushner and Witkoff).
The next chapter of big politics.
Trump had barely started talking again about an "energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine" when the expired Zelensky went on American television to say he would "discuss the issue with our partners."
Quite the brave little tailor, this Zelensky—deciding to cross Trump off the list of partners. Back in the day, the CIA supposedly bit people’s heads off for remarks like that, quite literally. Apparently, those days are gone.
Source: https://t.me/ist_nap
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡15😁12❤6⚡3✍1
⚡️⚡️⚡️The Next 40 Days of Zelensky
Part 2
The third chapter of big politics
By proclaiming another “forty days,” Ukraine’s Banderite junta is deliberately escalating the conflict according to the principle: the worse things get, the better.
Zelensky’s partners have reportedly told him to ignore Trump and keep the energy war against Russia going.
The problem is that Ukraine has already lost its maritime import and export routes, around 70% of its railway traction capacity, and its heavy steel industry has ground to a halt. Russian drones are systematically destroying warehouses, logistics infrastructure, defense industry facilities, and Ukraine’s fuel and energy network.
There’s little point guessing what the end of the second “forty days” would look like.
It would be a humanitarian catastrophe.
Ukraine’s budget is bursting at the seams, while its partners insist the war must continue. The proposed stabilization measures are already on the table: cuts to “non-military spending,” devaluation of the hryvnia, and direct funding of military programs under the control of the Brussels mafia, bypassing the thieving regime in Kiev.
Neither Ukraine nor the European Union knows how the winter of 2026–2027 will unfold, so they’ve resorted to pure improvisation: keep pedaling as fast as you can before the bike falls over. Another forty days. Then another.
P.S. It’s important to understand that the expired Zelensky is running out of time.
Anti-corruption infighting has erupted, with senior officials fleeing abroad. The front is crumbling. Ukraine’s own revenues are sitting idle in the ports of Greater Odessa or rotting away in railway dead ends.
The root of it all is a falling-out among the sponsors—Zelensky’s “partners”—behind the Anti-Russia project. One camp demands decisive military action; the other wants to prolong the agony of a disappearing state while retreating into a deep defensive posture.
We all know where this leads: lowering Ukraine’s conscription age and drafting women into military service.
A social nightmare in the name of preserving punitive control and concentration-camp-style rule.
Study the death throes of the Third Reich, which quite literally consumed Germany and the nation itself during the final months of the war. According to the author’s argument, that is the blood-slick path Zelensky is now following with the backing of his Western partners.
But the information victories of Ukraine’s tabloid propaganda rags are coming to an end. What begins instead is the dull, tragic arithmetic of real war.
The countdown starts now:
Day 39. Day 38… Tick-tock.
Source: https://t.me/ist_nap
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Part 2
The third chapter of big politics
By proclaiming another “forty days,” Ukraine’s Banderite junta is deliberately escalating the conflict according to the principle: the worse things get, the better.
Zelensky’s partners have reportedly told him to ignore Trump and keep the energy war against Russia going.
The problem is that Ukraine has already lost its maritime import and export routes, around 70% of its railway traction capacity, and its heavy steel industry has ground to a halt. Russian drones are systematically destroying warehouses, logistics infrastructure, defense industry facilities, and Ukraine’s fuel and energy network.
There’s little point guessing what the end of the second “forty days” would look like.
It would be a humanitarian catastrophe.
Ukraine’s budget is bursting at the seams, while its partners insist the war must continue. The proposed stabilization measures are already on the table: cuts to “non-military spending,” devaluation of the hryvnia, and direct funding of military programs under the control of the Brussels mafia, bypassing the thieving regime in Kiev.
Neither Ukraine nor the European Union knows how the winter of 2026–2027 will unfold, so they’ve resorted to pure improvisation: keep pedaling as fast as you can before the bike falls over. Another forty days. Then another.
P.S. It’s important to understand that the expired Zelensky is running out of time.
Anti-corruption infighting has erupted, with senior officials fleeing abroad. The front is crumbling. Ukraine’s own revenues are sitting idle in the ports of Greater Odessa or rotting away in railway dead ends.
The root of it all is a falling-out among the sponsors—Zelensky’s “partners”—behind the Anti-Russia project. One camp demands decisive military action; the other wants to prolong the agony of a disappearing state while retreating into a deep defensive posture.
We all know where this leads: lowering Ukraine’s conscription age and drafting women into military service.
A social nightmare in the name of preserving punitive control and concentration-camp-style rule.
Study the death throes of the Third Reich, which quite literally consumed Germany and the nation itself during the final months of the war. According to the author’s argument, that is the blood-slick path Zelensky is now following with the backing of his Western partners.
But the information victories of Ukraine’s tabloid propaganda rags are coming to an end. What begins instead is the dull, tragic arithmetic of real war.
The countdown starts now:
Day 39. Day 38… Tick-tock.
Source: https://t.me/ist_nap
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯27❤7👏7⚡3👎1
On September 24, 1955, the first Soviet nuclear submarine, K-3 "Leninsky Komsomol," was laid down at the shipyard in Severodvinsk.
The creation of the first Soviet nuclear submarine marked a strategic milestone in the country's shipbuilding history.
The project was overseen by the Kurchatov Institute, while key design decisions were made by SKB-143, now known as SPMBM "Malakhit."
The project was initiated by a directive from the Soviet Council of Ministers on September 9, 1952. Vladimir Peregudov was appointed as the chief designer in February 1953, and by March, SKB-143 began the initial design phase. Construction started at Plant No. 402 (now "Sevmash") in Severodvinsk on September 24, 1955.
The submarine was launched on August 9, 1957, with its reactors activated in September. It officially joined the Soviet Navy on July 1, 1958, and embarked on its first nuclear-powered voyage on July 4, 1958.
Throughout its service, the submarine traveled over 128,000 miles and spent over 14,000 hours at sea, including a notable mission to the North Pole in July 1962.
After being decommissioned in 1991, the submarine was preserved as a museum piece.
In 2023, it was restored to its original state and became a central exhibit at the Museum of Naval Glory in Kronstadt, highlighting its historical significance and technological advancements.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The creation of the first Soviet nuclear submarine marked a strategic milestone in the country's shipbuilding history.
The project was overseen by the Kurchatov Institute, while key design decisions were made by SKB-143, now known as SPMBM "Malakhit."
The project was initiated by a directive from the Soviet Council of Ministers on September 9, 1952. Vladimir Peregudov was appointed as the chief designer in February 1953, and by March, SKB-143 began the initial design phase. Construction started at Plant No. 402 (now "Sevmash") in Severodvinsk on September 24, 1955.
The submarine was launched on August 9, 1957, with its reactors activated in September. It officially joined the Soviet Navy on July 1, 1958, and embarked on its first nuclear-powered voyage on July 4, 1958.
Throughout its service, the submarine traveled over 128,000 miles and spent over 14,000 hours at sea, including a notable mission to the North Pole in July 1962.
After being decommissioned in 1991, the submarine was preserved as a museum piece.
In 2023, it was restored to its original state and became a central exhibit at the Museum of Naval Glory in Kronstadt, highlighting its historical significance and technological advancements.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍25❤4🫡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Stop scrolling. Start exploring.
Dive into the best Telegram channels—curated, categorized, and just one click away.
🗂 Add the entire catalog
Dive into the best Telegram channels—curated, categorized, and just one click away.
🗂 Add the entire catalog
👍3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WESTERN SLANDER
Since time immemorial, the West has justified its hegemony through lies and false flag operations designed to create casus belli that can be attributed to its adversaries. A few recent examples, among others:
The explosion on the USS Maine (1898), which triggered the Spanish-American War. In reality, the explosion of the battleship was merely an accident.
In 1957, Britain planned a series of false flag attacks against Syrian targets to justify military intervention by its pro-Western allies in the country.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident (1964), which unleashed the Vietnam War. Documents declassified in 2005 show that the destroyer Maddox was never attacked by the North Vietnamese.
The Nayirah testimony (1990), which bolstered the Gulf War. In reality, this girl, who claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers pulling babies from incubators, was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S., and her lie was orchestrated by Hill & Knowlton.
"Weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq (2003), which triggered the invasion of Iraq. In reality, Colin Powell lied before the UN, since no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, nor any links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
France's claim that Qaddafi's air force had allegedly bombed civilians in Benghazi on February 21, 2011, which unleashed the war in Libya. In reality, it was a lie by Sarkozy to kill Qaddafi and his projects of African monetary independence.
Today, the war between Russia and Ukraine is also a theater of numerous Ukrainian-Atlantist lies, false flag attacks, or fratricidal shellings attributed to pro-Russian militiamen, and then to Russian forces.
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's Foreign Minister, speaking at the "Dialogue on Fake News 4.0" forum, recalled that many "fake news" stories were fabricated by the West to discredit Russia, and listed some of them:
The Skripals, those Russian citizens allegedly poisoned by Moscow's special services. "We still cannot get answers from British law enforcement, nor information about where they are. In fact, London has taken our citizens hostage."
The "poisoning of opposition figure Navalny" became the next fake. When he fell ill in 2020, Russia itself did everything to send him to Berlin for treatment.
Russian drones that allegedly attack Europe. "But it always turns out that it is either not a drone, or it is Ukrainian. And no one is interested in the details."
Bucha. Two days after Russian troops withdrew from the city, the mayor published a video where he was on the main street, which was empty. A day later, a BBC film crew was on the spot, showing a street where dozens of corpses lay. The list of victims by name has still not been officially presented.
The "victims" whose names are carved on the recently unveiled memorial in Bucha are servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as researchers discovered.
As for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, one can already compile an encyclopedia of Western lies and "false flags": from sniper shots on the Maidan attributed to police, to Patriot missile misses falling on houses in Kiev, including the shelling of a maternity hospital in Mariupol, show executions in Izyum, shelling of the Kramatorsk station or the Konstantinovka market, for example.
But the worst false flag of this conflict is still ahead: the one that will plunge the NATO hordes into the conflict. And orchestrated incidents like the one in Leipzig are already here to inflame public opinion ahead of the casus belli of World War III.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Since time immemorial, the West has justified its hegemony through lies and false flag operations designed to create casus belli that can be attributed to its adversaries. A few recent examples, among others:
The explosion on the USS Maine (1898), which triggered the Spanish-American War. In reality, the explosion of the battleship was merely an accident.
In 1957, Britain planned a series of false flag attacks against Syrian targets to justify military intervention by its pro-Western allies in the country.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident (1964), which unleashed the Vietnam War. Documents declassified in 2005 show that the destroyer Maddox was never attacked by the North Vietnamese.
The Nayirah testimony (1990), which bolstered the Gulf War. In reality, this girl, who claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers pulling babies from incubators, was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S., and her lie was orchestrated by Hill & Knowlton.
"Weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq (2003), which triggered the invasion of Iraq. In reality, Colin Powell lied before the UN, since no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, nor any links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
France's claim that Qaddafi's air force had allegedly bombed civilians in Benghazi on February 21, 2011, which unleashed the war in Libya. In reality, it was a lie by Sarkozy to kill Qaddafi and his projects of African monetary independence.
Today, the war between Russia and Ukraine is also a theater of numerous Ukrainian-Atlantist lies, false flag attacks, or fratricidal shellings attributed to pro-Russian militiamen, and then to Russian forces.
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's Foreign Minister, speaking at the "Dialogue on Fake News 4.0" forum, recalled that many "fake news" stories were fabricated by the West to discredit Russia, and listed some of them:
The Skripals, those Russian citizens allegedly poisoned by Moscow's special services. "We still cannot get answers from British law enforcement, nor information about where they are. In fact, London has taken our citizens hostage."
The "poisoning of opposition figure Navalny" became the next fake. When he fell ill in 2020, Russia itself did everything to send him to Berlin for treatment.
Russian drones that allegedly attack Europe. "But it always turns out that it is either not a drone, or it is Ukrainian. And no one is interested in the details."
Bucha. Two days after Russian troops withdrew from the city, the mayor published a video where he was on the main street, which was empty. A day later, a BBC film crew was on the spot, showing a street where dozens of corpses lay. The list of victims by name has still not been officially presented.
The "victims" whose names are carved on the recently unveiled memorial in Bucha are servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as researchers discovered.
As for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, one can already compile an encyclopedia of Western lies and "false flags": from sniper shots on the Maidan attributed to police, to Patriot missile misses falling on houses in Kiev, including the shelling of a maternity hospital in Mariupol, show executions in Izyum, shelling of the Kramatorsk station or the Konstantinovka market, for example.
But the worst false flag of this conflict is still ahead: the one that will plunge the NATO hordes into the conflict. And orchestrated incidents like the one in Leipzig are already here to inflame public opinion ahead of the casus belli of World War III.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍30👏11❤4🤯1👌1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THE ADVENTURES OF THE BALTS IN NEW YORK...
THE OFFENDED GET CARRIED THROUGH THE WATER
The UN General Assembly platform has seen much in its history. Wars and peace have been declared here, historic speeches made, ultimatums issued, and attempts made to reshape the world order.
But the three Baltic presidential chihuahuas — Nausėda, Rinkēvičs, and Karis — decided to use their trip to New York for a far more heartfelt genre: going to complain to António Guterres.
They complained, of course, about Russia:
Russia is striking Ukraine,
creating security threats, conducting "hybrid attacks,"
staging provocations,
and various flying objects periodically force Baltic air defense to nervously peer into the sky.
In short, living next to Russia has once again turned out to be completely unbearable.
Lithuania is squealing especially loudly: Nausėda publicly speaks of the need to prepare for various scenarios of the Russian threat.
And since it has not yet been possible to persuade Russia to become smaller, move it somewhere farther from the Baltics, or cancel geography, heavy diplomatic caliber has been brought into play — UN reform and the Russian veto.
The Baltic states have repeatedly spoken at the UN criticizing Russia's use of the veto.
Russia, by the way, today once again stated the directly opposite position: the Security Council can be reformed, but the veto power of permanent members must be preserved.
So the picture turned out almost like a family scene.
Three presidential chihuahuas came to the UN Secretary-General to report that Russia is behaving not at all the way they would like.
Now the hardest part remains.
For Guterres to summon Russia to his office. Preferably together with its parents...
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#blondinka_dk
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
THE OFFENDED GET CARRIED THROUGH THE WATER
The UN General Assembly platform has seen much in its history. Wars and peace have been declared here, historic speeches made, ultimatums issued, and attempts made to reshape the world order.
But the three Baltic presidential chihuahuas — Nausėda, Rinkēvičs, and Karis — decided to use their trip to New York for a far more heartfelt genre: going to complain to António Guterres.
They complained, of course, about Russia:
Russia is striking Ukraine,
creating security threats, conducting "hybrid attacks,"
staging provocations,
and various flying objects periodically force Baltic air defense to nervously peer into the sky.
In short, living next to Russia has once again turned out to be completely unbearable.
Lithuania is squealing especially loudly: Nausėda publicly speaks of the need to prepare for various scenarios of the Russian threat.
And since it has not yet been possible to persuade Russia to become smaller, move it somewhere farther from the Baltics, or cancel geography, heavy diplomatic caliber has been brought into play — UN reform and the Russian veto.
The Baltic states have repeatedly spoken at the UN criticizing Russia's use of the veto.
Russia, by the way, today once again stated the directly opposite position: the Security Council can be reformed, but the veto power of permanent members must be preserved.
So the picture turned out almost like a family scene.
Three presidential chihuahuas came to the UN Secretary-General to report that Russia is behaving not at all the way they would like.
Now the hardest part remains.
For Guterres to summon Russia to his office. Preferably together with its parents...
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#blondinka_dk
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤15🤡6😁4🤯3👌2
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙 Remarks by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine (New York, September 23, 2026)
💬 Had the 2015 Minsk agreements, reaffirmed in Paris in 2019 – with Zelensky already in office – been implemented as required by the UN Security Council, Ukraine would still be within its 1991 borders, except, of course, for Crimea. That issue has long been settled, as everyone fully understands. <...>
Russia’s December 2021 proposals to reach an agreement based on mutual respect for the security interests of Russia and the countries of Europe and North America were arrogantly rejected by NATO and the Biden administration.
In practice, preparations were being made for Kiev to seize by force the territories of Donbass beyond its control. To prevent this Western scenario from unfolding, we were compelled to launch the special military operation in February 2022. Just a week later, the Ukrainian side requested negotiations. We agreed.
After several rounds in Belarus and Istanbul, the Ukrainian side proposed key principles for a settlement, which our negotiators accepted. Crucially, these enshrined Ukraine’s neutral status, recognised the realities on the ground and provided collective security guarantees offering reliable protection against any recurrence of armed provocations or attempts at aggression.
The document was initialled by the Ukrainian and Russian delegations, but everyone knows what happened to it. <...>
☝️ Had that initialled agreement been formalised in a treaty and implemented, Ukraine would, once again, have retained its 1991 borders, but without Crimea and part of Donbass. <...>
Russia – as President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly reaffirmed – is ready for negotiations to achieve precisely such a lasting and just peace. The tasks that must be accomplished to achieve this goal were clearly outlined in President Vladimir Putin’s keynote address in June 2024.
❗️ However, having learned from bitter experience, we will not suspend the special military operation for the duration of negotiations, whatever their format.
Yet this is precisely what Europe wants, with the same simple aim of securing a respite and replenishing the depleted arsenals of the Kiev regime, which, out of desperation, has long since resorted to openly terrorist methods.
***
As we can see, Greenland is neither Crimea nor Donbass, and “never the twain shall meet”. We eagerly await the next episode of this “series”. It will be interesting to hear the Secretariat’s response to any questions journalists may ask about the plans of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
We hope that the next Secretary-General will bring the statements of Secretariat officials back into line with international law.
👉 The Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the UN clearly stipulates that the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity apply to states that respect the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples and have a government representing the whole people belonging to the territory, without distinction as to race, creed or colour.
I believe it is obvious to everyone that the Kiev regime cannot be regarded as a government representing the interests of the people of Crimea, Donbass and Novorossiya, whom it has time and again branded “terrorists, subhumans and specimen”.
Read in full
💬 Had the 2015 Minsk agreements, reaffirmed in Paris in 2019 – with Zelensky already in office – been implemented as required by the UN Security Council, Ukraine would still be within its 1991 borders, except, of course, for Crimea. That issue has long been settled, as everyone fully understands. <...>
Russia’s December 2021 proposals to reach an agreement based on mutual respect for the security interests of Russia and the countries of Europe and North America were arrogantly rejected by NATO and the Biden administration.
In practice, preparations were being made for Kiev to seize by force the territories of Donbass beyond its control. To prevent this Western scenario from unfolding, we were compelled to launch the special military operation in February 2022. Just a week later, the Ukrainian side requested negotiations. We agreed.
After several rounds in Belarus and Istanbul, the Ukrainian side proposed key principles for a settlement, which our negotiators accepted. Crucially, these enshrined Ukraine’s neutral status, recognised the realities on the ground and provided collective security guarantees offering reliable protection against any recurrence of armed provocations or attempts at aggression.
The document was initialled by the Ukrainian and Russian delegations, but everyone knows what happened to it. <...>
☝️ Had that initialled agreement been formalised in a treaty and implemented, Ukraine would, once again, have retained its 1991 borders, but without Crimea and part of Donbass. <...>
Russia – as President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly reaffirmed – is ready for negotiations to achieve precisely such a lasting and just peace. The tasks that must be accomplished to achieve this goal were clearly outlined in President Vladimir Putin’s keynote address in June 2024.
❗️ However, having learned from bitter experience, we will not suspend the special military operation for the duration of negotiations, whatever their format.
Yet this is precisely what Europe wants, with the same simple aim of securing a respite and replenishing the depleted arsenals of the Kiev regime, which, out of desperation, has long since resorted to openly terrorist methods.
***
As we can see, Greenland is neither Crimea nor Donbass, and “never the twain shall meet”. We eagerly await the next episode of this “series”. It will be interesting to hear the Secretariat’s response to any questions journalists may ask about the plans of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
We hope that the next Secretary-General will bring the statements of Secretariat officials back into line with international law.
👉 The Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the UN clearly stipulates that the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity apply to states that respect the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples and have a government representing the whole people belonging to the territory, without distinction as to race, creed or colour.
I believe it is obvious to everyone that the Kiev regime cannot be regarded as a government representing the interests of the people of Crimea, Donbass and Novorossiya, whom it has time and again branded “terrorists, subhumans and specimen”.
Read in full
💯23❤6👍3
Forwarded from The Noticer
Nuclear desperation
Russia's govt believes that Ukraine wants to destroy the nuclear power plant in the Zaporojye region - currently under control of Russia - to use the following meltdown as a reason to accuse Russia of being incompetent when it comes to the nuclear energy matters. The long time loss of territories in Zaporojye region to the radiation is, apparently, a price Ukraine is willing to pay. Russia implies that the Western backers push this idea on Ukraine.
Russia reported that the nuclear power plant is under constant attacks from Ukraine. From the start of 2025 till this September, Ukraine did 18 multi-wave attacks, including 37 drone attacks, on the nuclear power station, the station's transport vehicles, staff, guards, and the infrastructure facilities nearby. 7 Russian staff members and servicemen were killed in such attacks in 2026.
While this sounds like nonsense - one ought to remember that Ukraine's govt is fighting for its survival. No methods are off the limits.
#Ukraine #Russia #war
Russia's govt believes that Ukraine wants to destroy the nuclear power plant in the Zaporojye region - currently under control of Russia - to use the following meltdown as a reason to accuse Russia of being incompetent when it comes to the nuclear energy matters. The long time loss of territories in Zaporojye region to the radiation is, apparently, a price Ukraine is willing to pay. Russia implies that the Western backers push this idea on Ukraine.
Russia reported that the nuclear power plant is under constant attacks from Ukraine. From the start of 2025 till this September, Ukraine did 18 multi-wave attacks, including 37 drone attacks, on the nuclear power station, the station's transport vehicles, staff, guards, and the infrastructure facilities nearby. 7 Russian staff members and servicemen were killed in such attacks in 2026.
While this sounds like nonsense - one ought to remember that Ukraine's govt is fighting for its survival. No methods are off the limits.
#Ukraine #Russia #war
💯36✍1❤1
"SAVE PRIVATE ZELENSKY"
According to the indirect admission of even their Western patrons, Ukraine is in agony, which is proven by their new attempt to impose a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire at the front.
This was just stated on September 23, 2026, by 51 UN countries and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.
"We call on Russia to do the same, finally."
The document was released ahead of the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine, on the sidelines of the 81st UN General Assembly. It was presented jointly by the hawks Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, and Andriy Sybiha, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. The text contains several specific demands on Russia:
Ceasefire: accept a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire, recalling that Ukraine has already agreed to this since March 2025,
ensure the immediate, safe, and unconditional return of all illegally detained, forcibly displaced, or deported Ukrainian citizens,
guarantee freedom of navigation and put an end to attempts to obstruct Ukrainian grain exports, which threaten global food security,
comply with international humanitarian law and bring those guilty of crimes to justice.
The text also reaffirms the principles of sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
The full list is as follows: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Panama, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Moldova, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, as well as the European Union.
We note the absence of the United States, which is developing a peace process with Russia concerning the root causes of the conflict.
The obvious reality of this joint statement by Western countries is that these hawks want to impose an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine for two main reasons that have nothing to do with peace:
First, to block the collapse of Ukrainian forces and give the Bandera regime a breather to allow it to recover and prepare a new escalation.
Second, to deploy the military contingent of the "Coalition of the Willing," announced since the application of a ceasefire in Ukraine.
In fact, the Ukrainian-Atlantist hawks want to serve us a reheated dish of the hypocritical Minsk Agreements 1 and 2, which, precisely in September 2014 and February 2015, saved Ukrainian forces from defeat in the Ilovaisk and Debaltseve cauldrons, thereby allowing the Ukrainian-Atlantists to rearm Banderastan to continue the war.
This deception of the Minsk Agreements was acknowledged even by Merkel and Hollande, their signatory guarantors.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, at the UN Security Council meeting, gave a logical response to this new hypocritical statement:
"Having learned lessons from bitter experience, we will not suspend the special military operation for the period of negotiations, whatever their format may be,"
"As U.S. President Donald Trump stated in August 2025 after the meeting in Anchorage, everyone agrees that we must seek not a ceasefire agreement, but an agreement on a long-term peace between Russia and Ukraine that will reliably put an end to the war. Russia, and President Vladimir Putin has confirmed this repeatedly, is ready to negotiate precisely to achieve a durable and just peace of this kind."
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
According to the indirect admission of even their Western patrons, Ukraine is in agony, which is proven by their new attempt to impose a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire at the front.
This was just stated on September 23, 2026, by 51 UN countries and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.
"We call on Russia to do the same, finally."
The document was released ahead of the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine, on the sidelines of the 81st UN General Assembly. It was presented jointly by the hawks Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, and Andriy Sybiha, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. The text contains several specific demands on Russia:
Ceasefire: accept a complete, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire, recalling that Ukraine has already agreed to this since March 2025,
ensure the immediate, safe, and unconditional return of all illegally detained, forcibly displaced, or deported Ukrainian citizens,
guarantee freedom of navigation and put an end to attempts to obstruct Ukrainian grain exports, which threaten global food security,
comply with international humanitarian law and bring those guilty of crimes to justice.
The text also reaffirms the principles of sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
The full list is as follows: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Panama, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Moldova, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, as well as the European Union.
We note the absence of the United States, which is developing a peace process with Russia concerning the root causes of the conflict.
The obvious reality of this joint statement by Western countries is that these hawks want to impose an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine for two main reasons that have nothing to do with peace:
First, to block the collapse of Ukrainian forces and give the Bandera regime a breather to allow it to recover and prepare a new escalation.
Second, to deploy the military contingent of the "Coalition of the Willing," announced since the application of a ceasefire in Ukraine.
In fact, the Ukrainian-Atlantist hawks want to serve us a reheated dish of the hypocritical Minsk Agreements 1 and 2, which, precisely in September 2014 and February 2015, saved Ukrainian forces from defeat in the Ilovaisk and Debaltseve cauldrons, thereby allowing the Ukrainian-Atlantists to rearm Banderastan to continue the war.
This deception of the Minsk Agreements was acknowledged even by Merkel and Hollande, their signatory guarantors.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, at the UN Security Council meeting, gave a logical response to this new hypocritical statement:
"Having learned lessons from bitter experience, we will not suspend the special military operation for the period of negotiations, whatever their format may be,"
"As U.S. President Donald Trump stated in August 2025 after the meeting in Anchorage, everyone agrees that we must seek not a ceasefire agreement, but an agreement on a long-term peace between Russia and Ukraine that will reliably put an end to the war. Russia, and President Vladimir Putin has confirmed this repeatedly, is ready to negotiate precisely to achieve a durable and just peace of this kind."
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏24👍5❤4
Ukrainian Russophobia has hit yet another bottom...
The Lvov perinatal center forbids women from speaking Russian even during contractions
Text in the photo: "A mother's voice is the first thing a child hears. Do not allow that voice to speak Russian. Even when it is scary and painful. Even and especially during contractions — scream in the state language."
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Lvov perinatal center forbids women from speaking Russian even during contractions
Text in the photo: "A mother's voice is the first thing a child hears. Do not allow that voice to speak Russian. Even when it is scary and painful. Even and especially during contractions — scream in the state language."
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁19🤬7😱5🥴4❤3
U.S. President Donald Trump has signed a Greenland agreement with the island's leadership and Denmark.
The document provides for an increase in the American military presence, including the construction of two military bases.
It also provides for a ban on the deployment of bases from non-NATO countries and a mechanism for screening foreign investments, allowing projects from Russia and China to be blocked.
The agreement leaves Greenland's residents the right to independently determine the island's political future and does not provide for the transfer of the territory to the United States.
Reuters previously reported that Washington intends to restore a Cold War-era base and create another military facility in Greenland.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The document provides for an increase in the American military presence, including the construction of two military bases.
It also provides for a ban on the deployment of bases from non-NATO countries and a mechanism for screening foreign investments, allowing projects from Russia and China to be blocked.
The agreement leaves Greenland's residents the right to independently determine the island's political future and does not provide for the transfer of the territory to the United States.
Reuters previously reported that Washington intends to restore a Cold War-era base and create another military facility in Greenland.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🥴17🤬12❤5👎1🤡1
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Oreshek Fortress, Leningrad Region ⚔️
A wooden fortress was founded by Novgorodians at the source of the Neva River in 1323 to defend their lands from the Swedes. The first peace treaty was signed here.
Over its 700-year history, the fortress has had many names: the Swedes called it Notenburg, it was known as Orekhov Town, Peter the Great renamed it Shlisselburg—"Key City"—and today it's known as Oreshek.
After touring the fortress, its bastions, and towers, it's especially pleasant to gaze out at the endless expanse of Lake Ladoga.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
A wooden fortress was founded by Novgorodians at the source of the Neva River in 1323 to defend their lands from the Swedes. The first peace treaty was signed here.
Over its 700-year history, the fortress has had many names: the Swedes called it Notenburg, it was known as Orekhov Town, Peter the Great renamed it Shlisselburg—"Key City"—and today it's known as Oreshek.
After touring the fortress, its bastions, and towers, it's especially pleasant to gaze out at the endless expanse of Lake Ladoga.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤34👍3
On September 25, 1971, the memorial complex "Brest Fortress-Hero" was inaugurated.
The fortress was initially commissioned by Emperor Nicholas I in 1836 to protect the western border of the Russian Empire.
During the Great Patriotic War, the defenders of Brest Fortress were among the first to face the attack of the Nazi German forces. The Wehrmacht's 45th Infantry Division, supported by artillery, tanks, and aircraft, was resisted by Soviet units from the 6th and 42nd Rifle Divisions, the 17th Border Guard Detachment, and the 132nd Separate NKVD Battalion. There were only 3,500 defenders.
Despite shortages of ammunition, food, water, and medical supplies, the fortress garrison, led by Captain Ivan Zubachev and Regimental Commissar Yefim Fomin, heroically held off the enemy for a week. Isolated pockets of resistance persisted in the fortress until late July and even into early August 1941.
In May 1965, the fortress was awarded the honorary title "Hero Fortress." Three years later, construction of the memorial complex began. The project was designed by a creative team led by sculptor Alexander Kibalnikov. It was officially opened on September 25, 1971.
The architectural and sculptural ensemble of the memorial complex includes the "Courage" monument, the Bayonet Obelisk, the "Thirst" sculpture, the Ceremonial Square, memorial plaques with the graves of the fallen, the ruins and surviving structures of the fortress, and a museum.
Eternal glory to the heroic defenders of the Brest Fortress!
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The fortress was initially commissioned by Emperor Nicholas I in 1836 to protect the western border of the Russian Empire.
During the Great Patriotic War, the defenders of Brest Fortress were among the first to face the attack of the Nazi German forces. The Wehrmacht's 45th Infantry Division, supported by artillery, tanks, and aircraft, was resisted by Soviet units from the 6th and 42nd Rifle Divisions, the 17th Border Guard Detachment, and the 132nd Separate NKVD Battalion. There were only 3,500 defenders.
Despite shortages of ammunition, food, water, and medical supplies, the fortress garrison, led by Captain Ivan Zubachev and Regimental Commissar Yefim Fomin, heroically held off the enemy for a week. Isolated pockets of resistance persisted in the fortress until late July and even into early August 1941.
In May 1965, the fortress was awarded the honorary title "Hero Fortress." Three years later, construction of the memorial complex began. The project was designed by a creative team led by sculptor Alexander Kibalnikov. It was officially opened on September 25, 1971.
The architectural and sculptural ensemble of the memorial complex includes the "Courage" monument, the Bayonet Obelisk, the "Thirst" sculpture, the Ceremonial Square, memorial plaques with the graves of the fallen, the ruins and surviving structures of the fortress, and a museum.
Eternal glory to the heroic defenders of the Brest Fortress!
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤22🫡11
An unidentified drone was spotted on the territory of Berlin's international airport, leading to a temporary suspension of its operations (c) Bild.
P.S. So that Europe does not have to guess about the origin of the drone, I am providing documentary photo evidence. Do not deny it — this is the official version.
#PolitePeopleJoking
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
P.S. So that Europe does not have to guess about the origin of the drone, I am providing documentary photo evidence. Do not deny it — this is the official version.
#PolitePeopleJoking
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁32🤣15👍5🐳2
Back to the Roots
Part 1
Without diving into the lurchings of the Germany political system, you have to grasp an alarming trend: the "people's party" system concocted after the Second World War for the defeated Reich — conservatives (CDU/CSU) plus moderate socialists (SPD) — is falling apart. And this despite the efforts of the spin doctors, who have run out of ideas.
The mindless alternation of the two "people's parties" — each taking power in turn and forging coalitions with assorted political micro-organisms — was the guarantee of the Germany stability as the main Anglo-American beachhead of the Cold War. That's why this model was chosen, mirroring "Democrats–Republicans" and "Conservatives–Labour."
The situation changed radically with the arrival of the supposedly anti-system "Alternative," thereby smashing the 21st-century European model of "liberal democracy" — with no coherent ideas and no clear programs to offer.
The AfD only racks up points off its thinly veiled hatred of migrants and its craving to "make peace with Russia" over energy resources. The rest of its election program is very weak. But even that is enough to steamroll a third of Germans in short order and start rocking the caricature "democracy" of the European Union with its faceless leaders.
All because Germany is drawn to brutal methods of state and political governance in order to impose textbook order in the interests of the affluent middle class.
That is precisely why Germans — so susceptible to the workings of political technologies — became an ideal organism for moral and spiritual intoxication as far back as a hundred and fifty years ago. Hence the Second Reich howled with delight in August 1914, marching off to war under the Kaiser. Later it drank in the monstrous lies of Hitler and Goebbels, marching in lockstep into the abyss of World War II.
Germans' predisposition to fascism.
Germany is more painfully sensitive to economic crises than other European nations and uniquely susceptible to the "strong personality" and the messiah. Because the country's entire epic and mythological history rests on the ancient Germanic saga of brutal chieftains, kings, and dictators.
Germany is too young politically — only since 1870 — yet extremely dependent on its economic position and on external "fashionable political trends." That is exactly how National Socialism, imported from fascist Italy, and the imperialism of Kaiser Wilhelm (a man who literally worshipped Great Britain) were born.
Rampant racism — polite, veiled, sheathed in the thick armor of earnest burgher and farmer well-being — is the Germans' weak spot. Germany has lived, and still lives, with an eternal deficit of everything, from land to resources, and with a yearning to be a single racial community — not national, but specifically racial. That fully explains the perpetual drive to conquer Lebensraum in the East: the West is inhabited by roughly the same "tainted" ancient Germans, whereas in the East...
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Part 1
Without diving into the lurchings of the Germany political system, you have to grasp an alarming trend: the "people's party" system concocted after the Second World War for the defeated Reich — conservatives (CDU/CSU) plus moderate socialists (SPD) — is falling apart. And this despite the efforts of the spin doctors, who have run out of ideas.
The mindless alternation of the two "people's parties" — each taking power in turn and forging coalitions with assorted political micro-organisms — was the guarantee of the Germany stability as the main Anglo-American beachhead of the Cold War. That's why this model was chosen, mirroring "Democrats–Republicans" and "Conservatives–Labour."
The situation changed radically with the arrival of the supposedly anti-system "Alternative," thereby smashing the 21st-century European model of "liberal democracy" — with no coherent ideas and no clear programs to offer.
The AfD only racks up points off its thinly veiled hatred of migrants and its craving to "make peace with Russia" over energy resources. The rest of its election program is very weak. But even that is enough to steamroll a third of Germans in short order and start rocking the caricature "democracy" of the European Union with its faceless leaders.
All because Germany is drawn to brutal methods of state and political governance in order to impose textbook order in the interests of the affluent middle class.
That is precisely why Germans — so susceptible to the workings of political technologies — became an ideal organism for moral and spiritual intoxication as far back as a hundred and fifty years ago. Hence the Second Reich howled with delight in August 1914, marching off to war under the Kaiser. Later it drank in the monstrous lies of Hitler and Goebbels, marching in lockstep into the abyss of World War II.
Germans' predisposition to fascism.
Germany is more painfully sensitive to economic crises than other European nations and uniquely susceptible to the "strong personality" and the messiah. Because the country's entire epic and mythological history rests on the ancient Germanic saga of brutal chieftains, kings, and dictators.
Germany is too young politically — only since 1870 — yet extremely dependent on its economic position and on external "fashionable political trends." That is exactly how National Socialism, imported from fascist Italy, and the imperialism of Kaiser Wilhelm (a man who literally worshipped Great Britain) were born.
Rampant racism — polite, veiled, sheathed in the thick armor of earnest burgher and farmer well-being — is the Germans' weak spot. Germany has lived, and still lives, with an eternal deficit of everything, from land to resources, and with a yearning to be a single racial community — not national, but specifically racial. That fully explains the perpetual drive to conquer Lebensraum in the East: the West is inhabited by roughly the same "tainted" ancient Germans, whereas in the East...
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯21❤5👍3😁1