Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
"The Singing Sands," Republic of Kalmykia
🏜️ Located within the "Black Lands" nature reserve is Europe's only anthropogenic desert, formed by overgrazing of livestock.
🏜️ Here you'll find the unique "singing sands": on windy days, the dunes emit a low hum reminiscent of a playing organ.
🏜️ One legend says it's the voices of mysterious desert spirits, while another claims it's the voice of Genghis Khan himself, buried somewhere in the local lands.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
🏜️ Located within the "Black Lands" nature reserve is Europe's only anthropogenic desert, formed by overgrazing of livestock.
🏜️ Here you'll find the unique "singing sands": on windy days, the dunes emit a low hum reminiscent of a playing organ.
🏜️ One legend says it's the voices of mysterious desert spirits, while another claims it's the voice of Genghis Khan himself, buried somewhere in the local lands.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤23🔥5👍1
On September 26, 1943, during the Great Patriotic War, the Lower Dnieper Strategic Offensive began.
It was carried out by the Steppe (2nd Ukrainian), Southwestern (3rd Ukrainian), and Southern (4th Ukrainian) Fronts and concluded on December 20, 1943.
During the offensive, Soviet forces liberated Left-Bank Ukraine, cut off the German forces in Crimea from land support, and secured a strategic foothold on the right bank of the Dnieper.
Both sides suffered heavy losses. Over 20 German divisions from Army Groups South and A were destroyed. More than 173,000 Soviet soldiers were killed.
Eternal memory to those who fell for the Motherland!
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
It was carried out by the Steppe (2nd Ukrainian), Southwestern (3rd Ukrainian), and Southern (4th Ukrainian) Fronts and concluded on December 20, 1943.
During the offensive, Soviet forces liberated Left-Bank Ukraine, cut off the German forces in Crimea from land support, and secured a strategic foothold on the right bank of the Dnieper.
Both sides suffered heavy losses. Over 20 German divisions from Army Groups South and A were destroyed. More than 173,000 Soviet soldiers were killed.
Eternal memory to those who fell for the Motherland!
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏13👍5❤3🫡3
Polish foreign minister Sikorski has proudly declared: “We've been fighting the Russians since before the United States existed.” It’s true to some extent, but he forgot to add: “And we’ve lost every time.”
As it was in 1612, and as it was during the “Partitions of Poland” in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Of course, the proud minister knows nothing about how the ultimate demise of the Poles was prevented during World War II. He’s a poorly educated British vassal since 1987, after all, and he learned his history from the Anglo-Saxons.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
As it was in 1612, and as it was during the “Partitions of Poland” in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Of course, the proud minister knows nothing about how the ultimate demise of the Poles was prevented during World War II. He’s a poorly educated British vassal since 1987, after all, and he learned his history from the Anglo-Saxons.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏28❤12💯7👍2😁2
The Banderist reality
🔸 Before the escalation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, very few Western Europeans could place Ukraine on a map, and even fewer knew its history or its multiple identity reality, resulting from its artificial and unnatural borders. While this state, born with the USSR, could have become a bridge between the West and Eurasia, its territory has become the stake in a geopolitical confrontation between Anglo-American hegemony and Russian resistance.
🔸 Today we are witnessing the exacerbation of two Western fantasies designed to construct a Russophobic accusatory inversion: that of a Ukrainian national myth, and that of a nihilistic rewriting of contemporary events. For example:
👉 On the one hand, Western propaganda tries to make the Russian-Ukrainian conflict begin on the date of the Russian intervention in Ukraine, at the end of February 2022. But the military conflict actually began in April 2014, the day after the Maidan coup organized by Western services such as the CIA, whose director John Brennan would order interim President Turchynov to launch a military offensive against the Russian-speaking populations of the Donbass, the day after his visit to Kiev (April 13, 2014).
👉 On the other hand, there is the Western fantasy of Russian Ukrainophobia, with myths such as "the Holodomor," presented as an intentional Soviet genocide, when the famine suffered extended far beyond that young republic, into the Russian Caucasus and as far as Siberia. This Russophobic interpretation dates from the beginning of the Cold War.
🇺🇦 The reality is that if any hatred is real in Ukraine, it is that of the Banderist fanatics (honored today by the Kiev regime), who would provide the Third Reich with zealous auxiliaries, military police, political militia, Waffen SS units, etc., guilty of around 1 million executions among Jewish, Russian, Roma, and other populations...
🤔 And this Russophobia, which Westerners have exploited from Maidan to the present day, was maintained in the Lvov region in western Ukraine (Galicia), both by former Banderist collaborators and by veterans of the SS Galicia division, for example (“Forest Brothers”), who were supported by the CIA. In 2014, their ideological heirs emerged openly through Ukrainian hooligans, Maidan rioters, or the special battalions of the Donbass war.
👀 A piece of evidence of this hysterical Russophobia dating from January 2011, found on the @Camille_Moscow channel:
🔸 Three years before the Maidan coup (which would bring to power these neo-Nazis who never exceeded 5% in Ukrainian elections), we see Mykhalchyshyn, a notorious neo-Nazi and elected member of the Ukrainian Social Nationalist Party—renamed Svoboda—on the Lvov city council, spewing his Russophobic hatred. In this public speech, he promises “the day when our Banderist army crosses the Dnieper, passes through Donetsk, and throws out the ‘blue-assed gang’ (Russians of the Donbass).”
🤔 Some will describe this moment as anecdotal, yet in 2014 it became symptomatic of a Nazi resurgence in Ukraine, embodied by that psychopath Yuriy Adrijanovych Mykhalchyshyn, born in Lvov in 1982:
👉 After the Lvov city council, Mykhalchyshyn, who in 2011 described the Shoah as a “luminous episode of European civilization,” also served as a deputy in the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) from 2012 to 2014.
🔸 An ideologue of Svoboda, Mykhalchyshyn wants the creation of an ethnic Ukrainian state through political re-education of “Malorossiya,” the regions of ancient Kievan Rus; an identitarian vision for Novorossiya (the Russian regions bordering the Black Sea); and ethnic cleansing of the Donbass, described as a “neo-Soviet nation.”
🤔 And if Western propaganda succeeds in carrying out this hallucinatory accusatory inversion, it is precisely because it has finished lobotomizing European populations.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔸 Before the escalation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, very few Western Europeans could place Ukraine on a map, and even fewer knew its history or its multiple identity reality, resulting from its artificial and unnatural borders. While this state, born with the USSR, could have become a bridge between the West and Eurasia, its territory has become the stake in a geopolitical confrontation between Anglo-American hegemony and Russian resistance.
🔸 Today we are witnessing the exacerbation of two Western fantasies designed to construct a Russophobic accusatory inversion: that of a Ukrainian national myth, and that of a nihilistic rewriting of contemporary events. For example:
👉 On the one hand, Western propaganda tries to make the Russian-Ukrainian conflict begin on the date of the Russian intervention in Ukraine, at the end of February 2022. But the military conflict actually began in April 2014, the day after the Maidan coup organized by Western services such as the CIA, whose director John Brennan would order interim President Turchynov to launch a military offensive against the Russian-speaking populations of the Donbass, the day after his visit to Kiev (April 13, 2014).
👉 On the other hand, there is the Western fantasy of Russian Ukrainophobia, with myths such as "the Holodomor," presented as an intentional Soviet genocide, when the famine suffered extended far beyond that young republic, into the Russian Caucasus and as far as Siberia. This Russophobic interpretation dates from the beginning of the Cold War.
🇺🇦 The reality is that if any hatred is real in Ukraine, it is that of the Banderist fanatics (honored today by the Kiev regime), who would provide the Third Reich with zealous auxiliaries, military police, political militia, Waffen SS units, etc., guilty of around 1 million executions among Jewish, Russian, Roma, and other populations...
🤔 And this Russophobia, which Westerners have exploited from Maidan to the present day, was maintained in the Lvov region in western Ukraine (Galicia), both by former Banderist collaborators and by veterans of the SS Galicia division, for example (“Forest Brothers”), who were supported by the CIA. In 2014, their ideological heirs emerged openly through Ukrainian hooligans, Maidan rioters, or the special battalions of the Donbass war.
👀 A piece of evidence of this hysterical Russophobia dating from January 2011, found on the @Camille_Moscow channel:
🔸 Three years before the Maidan coup (which would bring to power these neo-Nazis who never exceeded 5% in Ukrainian elections), we see Mykhalchyshyn, a notorious neo-Nazi and elected member of the Ukrainian Social Nationalist Party—renamed Svoboda—on the Lvov city council, spewing his Russophobic hatred. In this public speech, he promises “the day when our Banderist army crosses the Dnieper, passes through Donetsk, and throws out the ‘blue-assed gang’ (Russians of the Donbass).”
🤔 Some will describe this moment as anecdotal, yet in 2014 it became symptomatic of a Nazi resurgence in Ukraine, embodied by that psychopath Yuriy Adrijanovych Mykhalchyshyn, born in Lvov in 1982:
👉 After the Lvov city council, Mykhalchyshyn, who in 2011 described the Shoah as a “luminous episode of European civilization,” also served as a deputy in the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) from 2012 to 2014.
🔸 An ideologue of Svoboda, Mykhalchyshyn wants the creation of an ethnic Ukrainian state through political re-education of “Malorossiya,” the regions of ancient Kievan Rus; an identitarian vision for Novorossiya (the Russian regions bordering the Black Sea); and ethnic cleansing of the Donbass, described as a “neo-Soviet nation.”
🤔 And if Western propaganda succeeds in carrying out this hallucinatory accusatory inversion, it is precisely because it has finished lobotomizing European populations.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬21💯8❤3🔥1
For the latest news and developments regarding the World, we recommend one channel!
🔴 Join Bellum Acta News: Bellum Acta is a as a Right-Wing Nationalist Crisis-focused NEWS aggregator which usually posts on Current News & World Geopolitics.
It focuses on:
🪖 Conflicts and Warzone frontline updates
🔥 World Geopolitics, specially Asia, Europe and Middle East
🌍 OSINT and IMINT
📰 Breaking News
It also often engages in political commentary with a bit satirical tones
👇 Join Bellum Acta 👇
https://t.me/BellumActaNews
It focuses on:
It also often engages in political commentary with a bit satirical tones
https://t.me/BellumActaNews
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍6❤1
"Heading Down the Same Road as World War II — On the EU's War Fever"
In a new episode of Omvärldsanalys on SwebbTV, hosts Mikael Willgert and Chris Forsne come right out and say it:
the war rhetoric coming from European politicians these days looks more and more like the road to World War II.
What these politicians are doing — stoking the war in Ukraine — is starting to look a lot like World War II. The EU is encouraging a war between Christian Russia and Christian Ukraine. We're killing other Europeans. It's the same road.
NATO was created as a defensive alliance, but it has turned into an aggressive tool for expansion. It was NATO that pushed to extend its borders right up to Russia, Ukraine included. That's not defense — that's an offensive policy that provokes conflict.
More and more people are starting to get it. Public opinion is slowly shifting: citizens are watching Europe push itself into the abyss under the banner of "defense." Instead of the peace and trade that postwar Europe was built on, we now get sanctions, militarization, and a direct push toward war between Slavic peoples.
If the EU keeps on this path of escalation, the consequences will be catastrophic. History is repeating itself — only this time, under the guise of "European values," another fratricidal war is being prepared on the continent. It's time to wake up before it's too late.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In a new episode of Omvärldsanalys on SwebbTV, hosts Mikael Willgert and Chris Forsne come right out and say it:
the war rhetoric coming from European politicians these days looks more and more like the road to World War II.
What these politicians are doing — stoking the war in Ukraine — is starting to look a lot like World War II. The EU is encouraging a war between Christian Russia and Christian Ukraine. We're killing other Europeans. It's the same road.
NATO was created as a defensive alliance, but it has turned into an aggressive tool for expansion. It was NATO that pushed to extend its borders right up to Russia, Ukraine included. That's not defense — that's an offensive policy that provokes conflict.
More and more people are starting to get it. Public opinion is slowly shifting: citizens are watching Europe push itself into the abyss under the banner of "defense." Instead of the peace and trade that postwar Europe was built on, we now get sanctions, militarization, and a direct push toward war between Slavic peoples.
If the EU keeps on this path of escalation, the consequences will be catastrophic. History is repeating itself — only this time, under the guise of "European values," another fratricidal war is being prepared on the continent. It's time to wake up before it's too late.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯30🤬3❤1
WHY DID TRUMP NEED GREENLAND AT ALL?
After the signing of the new treaty, the main question remains: why did the U.S. need to expand its presence in Greenland so significantly?
The answer, it seems, lies primarily on the map.
First — the defense of North America itself.
The shortest trajectories of strategic missiles between Russia and North America pass through the high northern latitudes. That is why the Pituffik base has served for decades as one of the American "eyes in the North": early warning of missile launches and space surveillance.
Now the treaty directly links American access to Greenland with the defense of the "American continent," including the future Golden Dome missile defense system. The Pentagon, even in its Arctic Strategy, envisioned the development of warning systems with better coverage of the polar regions.
Second — Russia and the North Atlantic.
Greenland, Iceland, and the United Kingdom form the famous GIUK gap — a strategic corridor between the Arctic and the North Atlantic.
And there, the discussion turns to Russian submarines, the Northern Fleet, and the routes between the U.S. and Europe.
The new treaty gives American forces free movement between defense zones by land, air, and sea, expands aviation capabilities, and even provides for underwater movement of American state vessels in Greenland's territorial waters.
Third — China. But rather for the future.
There are no Chinese military bases around Greenland today. Washington is solving a different task: to ensure they do not appear there tomorrow.
That is why the treaty prohibits the permanent military presence of non-NATO states without the consent of the parties and restricts their investments in sensitive sectors — infrastructure, resources, and facilities capable of providing access to classified information or strategic influence.
And finally — the Arctic itself.
New routes, resources, the North Atlantic, Russia with its vast Arctic infrastructure, and China with long-term interests in the North.
And now let's look at what the U.S. is assembling:
Pituffik is being modernized.
Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig are being added.
New defense zones are possible in the future.
Unmanned military facilities are possible.
Sea and air access is expanding.
Military bases of non-NATO countries are blocked.
Sensitive foreign investments are restricted.
There is no expiration date for the treaty.
This already looks far less like preparation for one specific war and far more like the creation of a permanent northern defensive belt for the U.S.
Moreover, the White House says this almost openly: Greenland must remain "forever" part of the strategic defense zone of North America.
So perhaps what Trump ultimately needed was not so much Greenland as property, but a guarantee that this giant platform between the Arctic, North America, and the North Atlantic would never find itself outside the American defense system.
And if that was the goal, then buying the island really turned out to be completely unnecessary.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
After the signing of the new treaty, the main question remains: why did the U.S. need to expand its presence in Greenland so significantly?
The answer, it seems, lies primarily on the map.
First — the defense of North America itself.
The shortest trajectories of strategic missiles between Russia and North America pass through the high northern latitudes. That is why the Pituffik base has served for decades as one of the American "eyes in the North": early warning of missile launches and space surveillance.
Now the treaty directly links American access to Greenland with the defense of the "American continent," including the future Golden Dome missile defense system. The Pentagon, even in its Arctic Strategy, envisioned the development of warning systems with better coverage of the polar regions.
Second — Russia and the North Atlantic.
Greenland, Iceland, and the United Kingdom form the famous GIUK gap — a strategic corridor between the Arctic and the North Atlantic.
And there, the discussion turns to Russian submarines, the Northern Fleet, and the routes between the U.S. and Europe.
The new treaty gives American forces free movement between defense zones by land, air, and sea, expands aviation capabilities, and even provides for underwater movement of American state vessels in Greenland's territorial waters.
Third — China. But rather for the future.
There are no Chinese military bases around Greenland today. Washington is solving a different task: to ensure they do not appear there tomorrow.
That is why the treaty prohibits the permanent military presence of non-NATO states without the consent of the parties and restricts their investments in sensitive sectors — infrastructure, resources, and facilities capable of providing access to classified information or strategic influence.
And finally — the Arctic itself.
New routes, resources, the North Atlantic, Russia with its vast Arctic infrastructure, and China with long-term interests in the North.
And now let's look at what the U.S. is assembling:
Pituffik is being modernized.
Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig are being added.
New defense zones are possible in the future.
Unmanned military facilities are possible.
Sea and air access is expanding.
Military bases of non-NATO countries are blocked.
Sensitive foreign investments are restricted.
There is no expiration date for the treaty.
This already looks far less like preparation for one specific war and far more like the creation of a permanent northern defensive belt for the U.S.
Moreover, the White House says this almost openly: Greenland must remain "forever" part of the strategic defense zone of North America.
So perhaps what Trump ultimately needed was not so much Greenland as property, but a guarantee that this giant platform between the Arctic, North America, and the North Atlantic would never find itself outside the American defense system.
And if that was the goal, then buying the island really turned out to be completely unnecessary.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯18🤔8❤6🤬2🔥1
Ukraine is moving abroad, but not completely
Ukraine's Ministry of Infrastructure is negotiating with neighboring states on the possible relocation of Ukrainian border crossing points abroad (according to Ukrainian media). The goal is to avoid Russian air strikes.
Overall, this already looks like a trend. In mid-September 2026, Ukraine's Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food, Taras Vysotsky, reported that due to constant attacks on logistics and warehouse facilities on Ukrainian territory, the possibility of relocating part of warehouse capacity outside Ukraine is being considered.
In addition, projects are already being implemented abroad:
· Build with Ukraine — the opening of joint enterprises producing Ukrainian weapons (drones, missiles, UAVs, ammunition, etc.) in European countries;
· Freyja — the development and production of air defense systems for Ukraine in Europe;
· Unity Hubs — centers for document processing and advisory services (already opened in Berlin, Stockholm, and Prague).
Everything is heading toward the point where, after some time (how long is currently difficult to assess, and much more effort must be applied for this), the territory of the quasi-state entity "Ukraine" will become empty and finally turn into a testing ground for confrontation between West and East, where only a subjugated population, trenches, minefields, fortress cities and towns, field hospitals, and camps of mercenaries from around the world will remain.
The current authorities abroad will indefinitely maintain the pseudo-legitimate status quo of this proxy territory.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Ukraine's Ministry of Infrastructure is negotiating with neighboring states on the possible relocation of Ukrainian border crossing points abroad (according to Ukrainian media). The goal is to avoid Russian air strikes.
Despite the absurdity of the initiative, it likely concerns not a physical relocation of infrastructure, but a procedural one. Thus, 12 jointly managed road and rail checkpoints with Poland and Moldova are already operating — that is, border and customs control is conducted on the territory of one of the parties. In other words, Ukrainian border guards and customs will receive data from the services of neighboring states, or conduct border control procedures alternately with them at adjacent checkpoints.
Overall, this already looks like a trend. In mid-September 2026, Ukraine's Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food, Taras Vysotsky, reported that due to constant attacks on logistics and warehouse facilities on Ukrainian territory, the possibility of relocating part of warehouse capacity outside Ukraine is being considered.
In addition, projects are already being implemented abroad:
· Build with Ukraine — the opening of joint enterprises producing Ukrainian weapons (drones, missiles, UAVs, ammunition, etc.) in European countries;
· Freyja — the development and production of air defense systems for Ukraine in Europe;
· Unity Hubs — centers for document processing and advisory services (already opened in Berlin, Stockholm, and Prague).
Everything is heading toward the point where, after some time (how long is currently difficult to assess, and much more effort must be applied for this), the territory of the quasi-state entity "Ukraine" will become empty and finally turn into a testing ground for confrontation between West and East, where only a subjugated population, trenches, minefields, fortress cities and towns, field hospitals, and camps of mercenaries from around the world will remain.
The current authorities abroad will indefinitely maintain the pseudo-legitimate status quo of this proxy territory.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥12👍8🤣6❤2🤯1
Zelensky's behavior in New York showed that he is a completely dependent figure: whatever his puppeteers order, that is what he will do, said Viktor Medvedchuk, leader of the "Other Ukraine" movement, in an author's column on the Vesti website.
"The puppeteers of the illegitimate one are trying to kill two birds with one stone. The main and most defenseless target, of course, is Trump. Zelensky is destroying his ratings ahead of the November U.S. elections."
According to him, "Trump fell for the hook of wanting a quick effect of a political deal with Zelensky."
"The majority of world analysts are unanimous: after November, Trump will turn into a 'lame duck,' and it will be good if he simply avoids impeachment until the end of his presidential term. [...] After all, in reality, it is impossible to come to an agreement with Zelensky, since he is a completely dependent figure, but a puppet of his political opponents."
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
"The puppeteers of the illegitimate one are trying to kill two birds with one stone. The main and most defenseless target, of course, is Trump. Zelensky is destroying his ratings ahead of the November U.S. elections."
According to him, "Trump fell for the hook of wanting a quick effect of a political deal with Zelensky."
"The majority of world analysts are unanimous: after November, Trump will turn into a 'lame duck,' and it will be good if he simply avoids impeachment until the end of his presidential term. [...] After all, in reality, it is impossible to come to an agreement with Zelensky, since he is a completely dependent figure, but a puppet of his political opponents."
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯27❤4👍4😁3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
👏9❤2
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Russia's First Underwater Eco-Trail, Primorsky Territory
🐠 The underwater trail is located in the Far Eastern Marine Reserve near the Rimsky-Korsakov Islands. In the terms of beauty and diversity, it has no equal in Russia. Divers who venture onto the eco-trail will see caves and grottoes, Kamchatka crabs and giant octopuses, starfish, seals—the list is long and astonishing.
🐠 This underwater journey is only available to those with specialized training. In total, you can spend about five hours on the trail accompanied by an instructor.
#ILoveRussia ❤
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
#ILoveRussia ❤
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤32👍7🥰3
On September 27, 1811, the Kazan Cathedral in St. Petersburg was consecrated.
The cathedral was founded in September 1801 on the site of the Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin, built in 1737. By the end of the 18th century, the church had become dilapidated, and it was decided to erect a new cathedral in its place.
In 1799, Emperor Paul I held a competition for the best design, insisting that the new cathedral resemble St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Many well-known architects of the time participated, but the little-known architect Andrey Voronikhin won.
Construction of the cathedral took 10 years and cost 4.7 million rubles. For comparison, in 1810, an average urban residence in St. Petersburg cost around 1,000 rubles.
On September 27, 1811, the day of Emperor Alexander I’s coronation, the Kazan Cathedral was ceremoniously consecrated by Ambrosius, Metropolitan of Novgorod and St. Petersburg.
After the victory in the Patriotic War of 1812, military trophies were brought here, including French banners and keys from captured cities and fortresses. Field Marshal Mikhail Kutuzov was later buried there.
In 1932, the Kazan Cathedral was closed. A gilded sphere with a spire replaced the cross on the dome, and the Museum of the History of Religion and Atheism was housed inside.
Religious services resumed in the cathedral in May 1991, and in 1994, a cross was restored to the dome. Six years later, the cathedral was fully returned to the Russian Orthodox Church and granted cathedral status.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The cathedral was founded in September 1801 on the site of the Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin, built in 1737. By the end of the 18th century, the church had become dilapidated, and it was decided to erect a new cathedral in its place.
In 1799, Emperor Paul I held a competition for the best design, insisting that the new cathedral resemble St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Many well-known architects of the time participated, but the little-known architect Andrey Voronikhin won.
Construction of the cathedral took 10 years and cost 4.7 million rubles. For comparison, in 1810, an average urban residence in St. Petersburg cost around 1,000 rubles.
On September 27, 1811, the day of Emperor Alexander I’s coronation, the Kazan Cathedral was ceremoniously consecrated by Ambrosius, Metropolitan of Novgorod and St. Petersburg.
After the victory in the Patriotic War of 1812, military trophies were brought here, including French banners and keys from captured cities and fortresses. Field Marshal Mikhail Kutuzov was later buried there.
In 1932, the Kazan Cathedral was closed. A gilded sphere with a spire replaced the cross on the dome, and the Museum of the History of Religion and Atheism was housed inside.
Religious services resumed in the cathedral in May 1991, and in 1994, a cross was restored to the dome. Six years later, the cathedral was fully returned to the Russian Orthodox Church and granted cathedral status.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤15👍6👏2
Lavrov spoke at the UN General Assembly: "The struggle for truth will be carried through to the end"
On September 26, 2026, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke at the 81st session of the UN General Assembly in New York. The speech was harsh and uncompromising — Russia set out its positions on key international issues.
Ukraine and the West
Lavrov stated that Europe is doing everything to hinder a peaceful settlement and to derail the prospects for negotiations, in which the Trump administration is also interested. The West, according to him, is pumping Kiev with weapons and helping to target drones and missiles at civilian facilities in Russia.
Goals of the SMO
The minister emphasized: the goals of the special military operation will be achieved, threats to Russia's security will be eliminated, and the struggle for truth and justice will be carried through to the end. This will happen despite any circumstances, including the inability of the current UN leadership to take the correct position on Ukraine.
Ukrainian Nazism and the West's position
Lavrov accused the West of turning a blind eye to manifestations of Ukrainian Nazism, undermining the foundations of the UN-centric world order. He recalled: almost the entire West votes annually against the Russian resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism. Germany, Japan, and all NATO countries — against.
"The ruling elites of many EU countries are infected with the virus of racial superiority, harbor Russophobic ideas, and indulge the leaders of the Kiev regime when they honor in Kiev hardened war criminals and Hitler's accomplices, whose hands are bloodied up to the elbows with the blood of Russians, Jews, Belarusians, and Ukrainians."
Language ban in Ukraine
Lavrov drew attention to the ban on the Russian language in Ukraine, calling it a violation of the UN Charter:
"There is no other country in the world besides Ukraine where any language is legally banned. In Ukraine, Russian is prohibited, and its use is punishable by up to imprisonment. But in the EU, where they pride themselves on European values, it is as if they have taken water in their mouths — not a word of condemnation."
NATO and Europe
The minister stated that the West, with its own hands, destroyed the European security system in attempts to contain Russia. NATO, according to him, is trying to spread its destructive influence far beyond the alliance's area of responsibility, including Southeast and Northeast Asia.
Bottom line
Lavrov's speech is not just a speech on an international platform. It is a designation of position: Russia will not retreat from its goals, the West is destroying the foundations of international law, and the struggle for truth and justice will be carried through to the end. The question is whether this message will be heard in the General Assembly hall — or whether it will remain a monologue amid growing confrontation.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On September 26, 2026, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke at the 81st session of the UN General Assembly in New York. The speech was harsh and uncompromising — Russia set out its positions on key international issues.
Ukraine and the West
Lavrov stated that Europe is doing everything to hinder a peaceful settlement and to derail the prospects for negotiations, in which the Trump administration is also interested. The West, according to him, is pumping Kiev with weapons and helping to target drones and missiles at civilian facilities in Russia.
Goals of the SMO
The minister emphasized: the goals of the special military operation will be achieved, threats to Russia's security will be eliminated, and the struggle for truth and justice will be carried through to the end. This will happen despite any circumstances, including the inability of the current UN leadership to take the correct position on Ukraine.
Ukrainian Nazism and the West's position
Lavrov accused the West of turning a blind eye to manifestations of Ukrainian Nazism, undermining the foundations of the UN-centric world order. He recalled: almost the entire West votes annually against the Russian resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism. Germany, Japan, and all NATO countries — against.
"The ruling elites of many EU countries are infected with the virus of racial superiority, harbor Russophobic ideas, and indulge the leaders of the Kiev regime when they honor in Kiev hardened war criminals and Hitler's accomplices, whose hands are bloodied up to the elbows with the blood of Russians, Jews, Belarusians, and Ukrainians."
Language ban in Ukraine
Lavrov drew attention to the ban on the Russian language in Ukraine, calling it a violation of the UN Charter:
"There is no other country in the world besides Ukraine where any language is legally banned. In Ukraine, Russian is prohibited, and its use is punishable by up to imprisonment. But in the EU, where they pride themselves on European values, it is as if they have taken water in their mouths — not a word of condemnation."
NATO and Europe
The minister stated that the West, with its own hands, destroyed the European security system in attempts to contain Russia. NATO, according to him, is trying to spread its destructive influence far beyond the alliance's area of responsibility, including Southeast and Northeast Asia.
Bottom line
Lavrov's speech is not just a speech on an international platform. It is a designation of position: Russia will not retreat from its goals, the West is destroying the foundations of international law, and the struggle for truth and justice will be carried through to the end. The question is whether this message will be heard in the General Assembly hall — or whether it will remain a monologue amid growing confrontation.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏30❤16👍5
The head of Rossotrudnichestvo responded to calls to open "Houses of Democracy" instead of "Russian Houses"
Igor Chaika, who heads Rossotrudnichestvo, commented on the initiatives of relocants and the liberal opposition abroad. Activists propose closing "Russian Houses" and opening "Houses of Democracy" in their place. Chaika's reaction was harsh and unambiguous.
What Chaika said
"People who have sold themselves can only open houses of tolerance, where they themselves will work."
"What could a 'House of Democracy' even represent? A joint headquarters of LGBT, terrorism, Russophobia, and methadone distribution?"
Context
Chaika took over Rossotrudnichestvo in 2026. The agency, despite pressure, does not plan to curtail its presence abroad. On the contrary, plans have been announced to open new "Russian Houses" in 11 countries.
The opposition's initiative, according to Chaika, is dictated not by ideology but by the search for new sources of funding after previous sponsors reduced support.
Bottom line
Chaika's statement is not just a response to criticism. It is a designation of position: "Russian Houses" remain an instrument of soft power, and attempts to replace them are regarded as part of the information war against Russia.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Igor Chaika, who heads Rossotrudnichestvo, commented on the initiatives of relocants and the liberal opposition abroad. Activists propose closing "Russian Houses" and opening "Houses of Democracy" in their place. Chaika's reaction was harsh and unambiguous.
What Chaika said
"Traitors are respected nowhere: neither in Russia nor abroad, traitors can only be used. And right now they are carrying out a new order from their employers, because their funding has been practically cut off, and the only way for them to survive is to launch information attacks on their own country on command."
"People who have sold themselves can only open houses of tolerance, where they themselves will work."
"What could a 'House of Democracy' even represent? A joint headquarters of LGBT, terrorism, Russophobia, and methadone distribution?"
Context
Chaika took over Rossotrudnichestvo in 2026. The agency, despite pressure, does not plan to curtail its presence abroad. On the contrary, plans have been announced to open new "Russian Houses" in 11 countries.
The opposition's initiative, according to Chaika, is dictated not by ideology but by the search for new sources of funding after previous sponsors reduced support.
Bottom line
Chaika's statement is not just a response to criticism. It is a designation of position: "Russian Houses" remain an instrument of soft power, and attempts to replace them are regarded as part of the information war against Russia.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯21👍10❤5