This is from Kremlin.ru:

Commentary by Russian Presidential Aide Yuri Ushakov Following the Telephone Conversation Between Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump

October 9, 2026, 23:55

Part 1

Yuri Ushakov: I would like to begin with a brief background and give you a little glimpse behind the scenes of how the dish called “A Telephone Conversation Between the Presidents of Russia and the United States” was prepared.

On the afternoon of October 7, we had a telephone conversation with U.S. presidential special envoy Steve Witkoff. He asked me to convey to Russian President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin the warm congratulations and best wishes of U.S. President Donald Trump. Steve Witkoff asked me to add his own very best wishes, as well as those of Jared Kushner, to our President, whom he sincerely respects and hopes to meet soon.

Steve Witkoff also informed us that the U.S. President would like to congratulate Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin personally by telephone, and we began looking for a suitable window in the schedules of the two presidents, taking into account, of course, the time difference between Moscow and Washington, as well as the fact that the Russian President was flying to Turkmenistan on the morning of October 8 for the CIS summit. We eventually agreed that the most suitable option would be a conversation immediately after our President returned from that trip.

President Trump postponed some of his previously scheduled events for today, and so this telephone conversation took place late in the evening on October 9.

Naturally, Donald Trump immediately warmly congratulated Vladimir Putin on his birthday, informally expressed his wishes for success and prosperity, and did not forget to convey greetings from his wife, Melania.

Vladimir Putin thanked his American counterpart for the congratulations and warm words addressed to him. He emphasized that we appreciate the attention the U.S. President and his team devote to dialogue with Russia, despite their busy schedules dealing with domestic American affairs and matters in the Middle East.

As for the actual content of the conversation, I will, of course, be unable to satisfy your curiosity, dear colleagues, by disclosing the specific issues the presidents discussed in detail.

Nevertheless, I will mention one notable moment in the conversation: our President expressed his gratitude to the U.S. First Lady for her active humanitarian work and, in particular, for her contribution to efforts to reunite children with their families who were separated during the Ukrainian conflict.

Regarding the concern expressed over the humanitarian situation in the city of Alyoshki in the Kherson Region, it was agreed that Russia’s Human Rights Commissioner, Yana Lantratova, would remain in constant contact with Melania Trump’s staff.

The leaders of the two countries discussed in detail preparations for major economic initiatives, including possible supplies of Russian petroleum products to American and global markets. Incidentally, special statements on this subject have already been issued by the Presidents of Russia and the United States. Satisfaction was also expressed with the communication channels currently operating between the two countries through their respective administrations, special services, and other relevant agencies.

Naturally, considerable attention was devoted to the prospects for resolving the conflict in Ukraine.

Vladimir Putin spoke in detail about the measures we are taking in response to the terrorist attacks by the Kiev regime, which has chosen escalation and every possible means of prolonging the conflict. It was emphasized that Kiev’s attempts to halt the advance of Russian troops along the entire line of contact by striking deep inside our territory have no prospect of success. Our Armed Forces have the initiative firmly in their hands and are advancing confidently.

To be continued…👇

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Part 2:

Commentary by Russian Presidential Aide Yuri Ushakov Following the Telephone Conversation Between Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump

October 9, 2026, 23:55

At the same time, Vladimir Putin made it clear that our position regarding the goals and objectives of the special military operation remains unchanged, as does our readiness for a political and diplomatic settlement aimed at achieving a long-term, lasting peace.

Particular note was made of the fact that, whereas during the previous presidential conversation the possibility of resuming trilateral negotiations involving the United States and Ukraine immediately after the State Duma elections had been discussed, the situation is now different.

Through its attempts to disrupt our elections by launching an exceptionally massive drone attack on Moscow, other cities, polling stations, and specific individuals involved in organizing the elections on the main voting day, the Kiev regime has effectively derailed the possibility of immediately resuming the negotiating process. Now, as the President put it, we will consider when these negotiations can be resumed.

Donald Trump listened carefully to our arguments and said he would instruct that the appropriate messages be conveyed to the Ukrainian delegation, which is in Miami these days for meetings with American representatives.

Vladimir Putin emphasized in particular that the possibilities for diplomacy on the Iranian front are far from exhausted. An agreement with Tehran can and should be reached.

The President mentioned that yesterday, in Turkmenistan, he had discussed the current situation in detail with Iranian President [Masoud] Pezeshkian. He noted that, despite occasional harsh public statements, the Americans continue indirect dialogue with the Iranians with Qatar’s participation. Incidentally, our proposal to transfer highly enriched Iranian uranium to Russia as a possible way out of the impasse remains on the table.

Significantly, Donald Trump did not overlook this remark and welcomed Moscow’s involvement in resolving the situation surrounding Iran.

Perhaps I should also mention another detail of the conversation: while discussing sports, the American President acknowledged Alexander Ovechkin’s contributions to world hockey.

The presidents’ conversation was very substantive and, I would say, friendly. It lasted an hour and a half. Neither wanted to hang up first. In light of this, I hope the U.S. President will not take offense if I quote his words: he is ready to continue communicating with Vladimir Putin this evening, during the night, and the following day.

To be continued…👇

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Part 3:

Commentary by Russian Presidential Aide Yuri Ushakov Following the Telephone Conversation Between Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump

October 9, 2026, 23:55

That is probably all I have to say. Thank you for your attention.

Question: Who eventually hung up if neither wanted to?

Yuri Ushakov: They hung up simultaneously, simultaneously.

I quoted Trump’s words. I think they are significant, firstly, and secondly, they show the nature of the conversation between the two presidents.

Question: Can you confirm what President Trump announced regarding the quantity of diesel fuel that will be supplied to the United States? President Trump published a post on Truth Social in which he outlined a delivery schedule. He said that 300,000 tons of diesel would be delivered immediately, followed by another 500,000 tons…

Yuri Ushakov: You know, I read that statement, and I mentioned it when I was telling you about the course of this conversation. What else can I add? The Russian President issued a special statement on this matter, which has already been circulated by all the media outlets. In addition, representatives of our Ministry of Energy have also issued a statement.

Question: When might a bilateral meeting between the two presidents take place?

Yuri Ushakov: You know, this question was not specifically discussed. But we all know that an important international event is coming up in China: the APEC summit. At least at this point, we can say that both leaders, the Russian and the American, are interested in participating in this event. Accordingly, if both leaders are at the same international venue, I assume they will find an opportunity to meet, shake hands, and talk.

Question: Can you say whether the United States made any concessions to Russia, and what Russia received in exchange for agreeing to supply diesel fuel to the United States?

Yuri Ushakov: You know, I think the American side will provide some further clarification on that matter. I have told you what I wanted to say. Our President has already clearly expressed what needed to be said in his special statement.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Putin arrived at the CIS summit in Turkmenbashi

On October 9, Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Turkmenbashi to take part in the summit of the Council of Heads of State of the CIS. The event is organized in the tourist zone "Avaza," located on the eastern coast of the Caspian Sea.

During the summit, the heads of state will focus on issues of cooperation within the association, sum up the results of the past year, and outline key directions for the future. It is expected that one of the decisions will be the transfer of the CIS chairmanship to Uzbekistan for 2027. The President of that country, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, will probably propose the dates of the next summit and speak about his side's priorities.

For the first time in the history of the CIS, the Iranian leader Masoud Pezeshkian is participating in the expanded negotiations. In addition, it is planned to sign a statement in honor of the 35th anniversary of the commonwealth, as well as several documents concerning security and the protection of law and order. Moreover, the participants intend to proclaim 2028 the Year of Social Development and Improving the Quality of Life, and 2029 — the Year of Transport Connectivity of the CIS.

After the summit ends, Putin will go to the Caspian Ecological Forum. There, the leaders of the Caspian states will discuss issues of environmental partnership, including the problem of the declining water level in the Caspian Sea. Based on the results of the meeting, a declaration is expected to be approved.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

GREENLAND HAS BEEN SQUEEZED. NEXT ON THE AGENDA — ICELAND

It seems Trump continues his fascinating board game called "Collect the North Atlantic." The rules are simple: everything of strategic interest to the U.S. must sooner or later end up under American control. Preferably voluntarily and with gratitude.

Greenland has already been dealt with. Formally, of course, no one annexed anyone. It's just that on September 22, the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland signed a new defense agreement opening up additional opportunities for the Americans to expand military infrastructure.

Sovereignty, of course, is sacred. Especially when it doesn't interfere with the construction of American military facilities.

On October 5–8, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is going on a European tour, and the first stop will be Reykjavik.

The official program sounds exceptionally peace-loving: economic cooperation, energy, Arctic security, and defense.

Well, what else is there to discuss with a small island state that doesn't even have its own regular army?

Foreign Minister Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir has already stated that she intends to deepen cooperation with the Americans, especially in defense and security. And she uttered a remarkable phrase: "We will continue to remain the eyes and ears of the alliance here in the North."

So that's what it is! And we thought Iceland was volcanoes, geysers, sheep, and the northern lights. It turns out that first and foremost it is a very conveniently located NATO observation post.

And the location is indeed golden.

Iceland is located in the center of the strategic GIUK corridor — between Greenland, Iceland, and the United Kingdom. It is precisely through this area that the most important routes for Russian submarines to exit from the northern seas into the Atlantic pass.

Control over it allows tracking fleet movements, deploying patrol aviation, and ensuring a military presence in the North Atlantic.

The Americans, by the way, already ran the show at Keflavik Air Base until 2006. Then the permanent presence was curtailed. But judging by the current activity, geography has again proven stronger than peacefulness.

And now let's look at the sequence of events.

On September 21, Rubio gathers Arctic allies in New York — to discuss security, military capabilities, and infrastructure.
On September 22, a new agreement on Greenland is signed.
On October 2, at the Icelandic Keflavik air base, defense ministers of ten JEF countries gather. They discuss a five-year program of military activity, strengthening NATO's northern flank, and, of course, the Russian threat.
Then Rubio goes to Reykjavik — to negotiate further defense and economic cooperation.

The result is a rather pretty construct: Greenland on one edge, Iceland in the middle, the United Kingdom and Norway on the other. All that remains is to connect all this with military infrastructure, aviation, radars, and surveillance systems.

Of course, exclusively for the sake of peace. The North Atlantic is so restless, after all! Especially when the Americans are missing something there.

So far, no official announcement has been made about transferring Iceland under American administration or creating a new permanent base. But negotiations on strengthening defense cooperation are already on the agenda.

And you know what is especially wonderful in this whole story?

When Russia speaks about strategic security at its own borders — it is called imperial ambitions. When the U.S. consistently expands its military presence across half the North Atlantic — it is called strengthening partnership and protecting democratic values.

And if a state doesn't have its own army, then the partnership turns out to be simply ideal. There is practically no one even to argue with.

All that remains is to wait for the results of Rubio's visit. I recommend that Icelanders, just in case, check whether new American flags have appeared on their maps.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

For the first time in 65 years, the U.S. will execute a serviceman — the firing squad will be shown live

The Pentagon has confirmed: the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan, a former military psychiatrist convicted of mass murder at Fort Hood in 2009, will be broadcast publicly. This is the first military execution in the U.S. since 1961 and the first execution by firing squad since World War II.

What is known

Hasan will be shot on December 3, 2026, at Fort Hood in Texas — the same place where he carried out the attack. President Donald Trump approved the execution of the sentence on the recommendation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Hegseth himself stated in an interview with the conservative television channel Real America's Voice: "We will make sure that people can see it, that the execution is public." According to him, people should understand that such actions have serious consequences.

The 2009 attack

On November 5, 2009, U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan, a military psychiatrist of Palestinian origin, opened fire at the medical center of Fort Hood base, where servicemen were undergoing medical examinations before being sent to Afghanistan. He shouted "Allahu Akbar" and used a pistol with a laser sight.

13 people were killed, 32 were wounded. In 2013, a military tribunal sentenced Hasan to death. He himself did not deny what he had done, stating that he acted to protect Muslims from the American army.

Why this is important

· First military execution since 1961. The last executed serviceman was Private John Bennett, hanged for rape.
· First execution by firing squad since World War II. In 1945, Private Eddie Slovik was shot for desertion in France.
· First public execution in the U.S. in 90 years. The last public execution took place in 1936 in Kentucky.

Controversy around the decision

Human rights activists and lawyers criticize the initiative. Fordham University law professor Deborah Denno notes: "There has never been a live broadcast of an execution." According to her, the broadcast may be motivated by a desire to create a "grotesque spectacle."

John Mills, a lawyer working with death row inmates, adds: "This is an unprecedented decision in the modern era, and it is being made on uncertain legal ground."

What's next

The appeals process in Hasan's case is not yet complete. His defense may file a habeas corpus petition in federal court, which could delay the execution for years.

#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll