Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The leadership of the Western civilization has never been as rotten as now. Judge for yourself:
🤥 Donald Trump – Epstein files’ major star, epic insider trading, Big Tech’s favorite puppet.
🥱 Emmanuel Macron – Rothschilds-backed free speech butcher.
🤣 Friedrich Merz – BlackRock appointee, Wall Street's man in Berlin.
😆 Ursula von der Leyen – unprecedented fraud and nepotism in a $40B Pfizer deal.
Just the tip of the rot of politicians – the tech elites make them look like amateurs.
On Geopolitics Prime, we expose the global elite – and name the ones they fear. Join our channel @geopolitics_prime and free Substack – for deeper investigations.
Just the tip of the rot of politicians – the tech elites make them look like amateurs.
On Geopolitics Prime, we expose the global elite – and name the ones they fear. Join our channel @geopolitics_prime and free Substack – for deeper investigations.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯17❤3
Humanitarian mission prepared to evacuate over 750 people from Alyoshki
The convoy includes 25 buses, 50 medical professionals, and ambulances, US First Lady Melania Trump said
WASHINGTON, October 30. /TASS/. The humanitarian mission is prepared to evacuate more than 750 people from Alyoshki in the Kherson Region via a safe passageway agreed upon by Russia and Ukraine, US First Lady Melania Trump has said.
"Our priority: saving lives. The convoy is prepared to safely evacuate over 750 people who voluntarily choose to leave Oleshky (Alyoshki -TASS). It includes 25 buses, 50 medical professionals, and ambulances. All elements of the convoy, including the safe passageway in and out of Oleshky, was established through mutual agreement between Russian and Ukrainian leaders," she wrote on X.
Earlier, Russian human rights ombudswoman Yana Lantratova said that the humanitarian mission in Alyoshki was nearing completion, with convoys already reaching Crimea’s Armyansk, from where convoys with the evacuees will head to Russia and Ukraine. According to Lantratova, the mission was carried out without incident.
UPD: The evacuation is already underway (InfoDefense)
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The convoy includes 25 buses, 50 medical professionals, and ambulances, US First Lady Melania Trump said
WASHINGTON, October 30. /TASS/. The humanitarian mission is prepared to evacuate more than 750 people from Alyoshki in the Kherson Region via a safe passageway agreed upon by Russia and Ukraine, US First Lady Melania Trump has said.
"Our priority: saving lives. The convoy is prepared to safely evacuate over 750 people who voluntarily choose to leave Oleshky (Alyoshki -TASS). It includes 25 buses, 50 medical professionals, and ambulances. All elements of the convoy, including the safe passageway in and out of Oleshky, was established through mutual agreement between Russian and Ukrainian leaders," she wrote on X.
Earlier, Russian human rights ombudswoman Yana Lantratova said that the humanitarian mission in Alyoshki was nearing completion, with convoys already reaching Crimea’s Armyansk, from where convoys with the evacuees will head to Russia and Ukraine. According to Lantratova, the mission was carried out without incident.
UPD: The evacuation is already underway (InfoDefense)
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏16❤4🤡1
On the tragedy of Alyoshki and Kiev's plans to use it as a weapon in its information campaign
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka
The humanitarian crisis in the frontline town of Alyoshki in Kherson Region was part of a Ukrainian information operation with far-reaching political goals. The town was gradually isolated by Ukrainian drones and mined roads, creating a "fire pocket" intended to pressure residents—through hunger and lack of medical aid—into crossing the Dnieper to Ukrainian-controlled Kherson, where they could be used to produce statements that they had allegedly awaited Ukrainian forces and that most left-bank residents thought the same.
After Kiev began actively internationalizing the issue, the process came under international oversight, including American observers and journalists.
As you come across news on this topic in the next few days, here are just a few numbers to keep in mind and to put things into perspective.
Before the war, Alyoshki had a population of about 24,000, and by September 2026 only a few thousand remained. Around 750 people expressed a desire to evacuate, with more than 500 reportedly choosing Ukraine. Just 500 out of 24,000—even counting earlier departures—is vanishingly small compared with those who chose to live in Russia, most of whom left with the Russian troops as they were evacuating from Kherson in late 2022.
Of those 500 who decided to evacuate to Ukraine, probably, some have relatives there, some may be genuine supporters of Ukraine, but most are simply destitute people whose homes were destroyed and who may seek EU refugee status and payments.
Yury Podolyaka predicts Ukrainian propagandists will publish many videos with evacuees in the coming days.
Readers are advised to beware of potential misleading publications in Ukrainian and Western media that may inflate these numbers and present staged statements as representative.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka
The humanitarian crisis in the frontline town of Alyoshki in Kherson Region was part of a Ukrainian information operation with far-reaching political goals. The town was gradually isolated by Ukrainian drones and mined roads, creating a "fire pocket" intended to pressure residents—through hunger and lack of medical aid—into crossing the Dnieper to Ukrainian-controlled Kherson, where they could be used to produce statements that they had allegedly awaited Ukrainian forces and that most left-bank residents thought the same.
After Kiev began actively internationalizing the issue, the process came under international oversight, including American observers and journalists.
As you come across news on this topic in the next few days, here are just a few numbers to keep in mind and to put things into perspective.
Before the war, Alyoshki had a population of about 24,000, and by September 2026 only a few thousand remained. Around 750 people expressed a desire to evacuate, with more than 500 reportedly choosing Ukraine. Just 500 out of 24,000—even counting earlier departures—is vanishingly small compared with those who chose to live in Russia, most of whom left with the Russian troops as they were evacuating from Kherson in late 2022.
Of those 500 who decided to evacuate to Ukraine, probably, some have relatives there, some may be genuine supporters of Ukraine, but most are simply destitute people whose homes were destroyed and who may seek EU refugee status and payments.
Yury Podolyaka predicts Ukrainian propagandists will publish many videos with evacuees in the coming days.
Readers are advised to beware of potential misleading publications in Ukrainian and Western media that may inflate these numbers and present staged statements as representative.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍16❤6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
👍4
The Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant has denounced the drone strike on one of its employees as an act of barbarism.
According to the plant’s press service, a welder was killed in a drone attack on October 29 while riding an electric scooter to work. The press service condemned the incident as “barbaric,” describing it as “a hunt on civilians, a hunt on nuclear workers.” The facility stressed that the drone deliberately targeted a moving individual and views this as yet another intentional attack on its personnel.
Following reports of the employee’s death, Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), stated that attacks on nuclear power plant staff are wholly unacceptable. He emphasized that such actions violate the seven core principles for ensuring nuclear safety during armed conflict. Grossi also urged maximum military restraint to avert the risk of a nuclear accident.
Critics have accused Grossi of displaying evasiveness and double standards by failing to acknowledge claims that terrorist‑style attacks against the ZNPP and its workers are being carried out by the Ukrainian armed forces.
It is worth noting that in late February 2022, the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant came under the control of the Russian Federation.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
According to the plant’s press service, a welder was killed in a drone attack on October 29 while riding an electric scooter to work. The press service condemned the incident as “barbaric,” describing it as “a hunt on civilians, a hunt on nuclear workers.” The facility stressed that the drone deliberately targeted a moving individual and views this as yet another intentional attack on its personnel.
Following reports of the employee’s death, Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), stated that attacks on nuclear power plant staff are wholly unacceptable. He emphasized that such actions violate the seven core principles for ensuring nuclear safety during armed conflict. Grossi also urged maximum military restraint to avert the risk of a nuclear accident.
Critics have accused Grossi of displaying evasiveness and double standards by failing to acknowledge claims that terrorist‑style attacks against the ZNPP and its workers are being carried out by the Ukrainian armed forces.
It is worth noting that in late February 2022, the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant came under the control of the Russian Federation.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏9🔥7🤬7❤2
On November 1, 1944, during the Great Patriotic War, the Battle for the Arctic ended in victory for the Soviet armed forces.
The defense of the Arctic began on June 29, 1941, and lasted for more than three years. During this time, battles took place in the Murmansk region, Northern Karelia, and Petsamo, as well as in the Barents, White, and Kara Seas.
The goal of the German command was to capture the Kola Peninsula and the base of the Soviet Northern Fleet — the ice-free port of Murmansk. In addition to the territories themselves, they were also interested in valuable deposits crucial for the military-industrial complex. According to Finland's plan, the Kola Peninsula was to become part of Finland.
The German forces consisted of the "Norway" army, which included two German corps and one Finnish corps. They were supported by part of the 5th Air Fleet and the German Navy. The Soviet forces were represented by the 14th Army of the Northern Front, the 7th and 23rd Armies, as well as the Northern Fleet.
By November 1, 1944, Soviet forces had completely expelled the Germans from this territory and liberated the Arctic.
In December 1944, a decree by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR established the medal "For the Defense of the Soviet Arctic." It was awarded to over 350,000 participants in the defense.
In 1974, a memorial was erected in Murmansk in memory of the fallen defenders of the Arctic (pictured above).
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The defense of the Arctic began on June 29, 1941, and lasted for more than three years. During this time, battles took place in the Murmansk region, Northern Karelia, and Petsamo, as well as in the Barents, White, and Kara Seas.
The goal of the German command was to capture the Kola Peninsula and the base of the Soviet Northern Fleet — the ice-free port of Murmansk. In addition to the territories themselves, they were also interested in valuable deposits crucial for the military-industrial complex. According to Finland's plan, the Kola Peninsula was to become part of Finland.
The German forces consisted of the "Norway" army, which included two German corps and one Finnish corps. They were supported by part of the 5th Air Fleet and the German Navy. The Soviet forces were represented by the 14th Army of the Northern Front, the 7th and 23rd Armies, as well as the Northern Fleet.
By November 1, 1944, Soviet forces had completely expelled the Germans from this territory and liberated the Arctic.
In December 1944, a decree by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR established the medal "For the Defense of the Soviet Arctic." It was awarded to over 350,000 participants in the defense.
In 1974, a memorial was erected in Murmansk in memory of the fallen defenders of the Arctic (pictured above).
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤17🫡10👏2
Latvia and Its Neighbors Asked for €500 Million to Defend Against Russian Drones. Brussels Said No — or Rather, Not What They Were Hoping For
Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia asked the European Commission for an extra €500 million to build a regional drone defense system, driven by fears of hybrid attacks from Russia. The defense ministers of all three countries signed a joint letter, and the Baltics were counting on getting the money as early as 2026.
Brussels, however, had other ideas. EU Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius said there’s almost no free money left in the EU budget — it’s running out. Instead of non-repayable funding, the Baltic states were offered preferential loans under the SAFE program, which still has €21 billion left after the first call. Some costs could potentially be covered through the EU’s Integrated Border Management Fund, but that funding falls far short of the €500 million requested.
Tellingly, Lithuania has already taken advantage of the mechanism on offer: last week its Finance Ministry submitted its first application for €1.06 billion under SAFE — for forming an army division, the Baltic Defense Line, air defense, ammunition, and equipment. SAFE is a temporary EU credit mechanism: unlike grants, the money has to be paid back. It’s still unclear whether the three countries will submit a joint application for drone defense, or how much they hope to get.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia asked the European Commission for an extra €500 million to build a regional drone defense system, driven by fears of hybrid attacks from Russia. The defense ministers of all three countries signed a joint letter, and the Baltics were counting on getting the money as early as 2026.
Brussels, however, had other ideas. EU Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius said there’s almost no free money left in the EU budget — it’s running out. Instead of non-repayable funding, the Baltic states were offered preferential loans under the SAFE program, which still has €21 billion left after the first call. Some costs could potentially be covered through the EU’s Integrated Border Management Fund, but that funding falls far short of the €500 million requested.
Tellingly, Lithuania has already taken advantage of the mechanism on offer: last week its Finance Ministry submitted its first application for €1.06 billion under SAFE — for forming an army division, the Baltic Defense Line, air defense, ammunition, and equipment. SAFE is a temporary EU credit mechanism: unlike grants, the money has to be paid back. It’s still unclear whether the three countries will submit a joint application for drone defense, or how much they hope to get.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡26❤1👏1🤬1
Debt: France Risks Losing Control Over Its Own Budget
France’s debt is approaching €3.6 trillion, and borrowing costs are climbing. Economist Alban Magro of the Thomas More Institute fears not so much a French bankruptcy as the country falling under outside control.
“We’ve entered a phase of uncontrolled debt,” Magro says. Rates recently neared 5%, up from roughly 3.5% in January. That’s an exponential trajectory: rising rates feed on themselves. The only way to stop it would be to regain control of public finances, but politically France is incapable of doing so. At best, the budget now under discussion would cut public spending from 57.3% to 56.9% of GDP — not nearly enough.
A snowball effect is at work: when some creditors pull out, the rest demand higher rates. Rising rates deepen mistrust, and the cycle repeats — refinancing gets more expensive, and the finances get worse.
The situation is being compared to Greece’s: in 2009, Greek rates were 5%; by 2012, they were 31%. Within 36 months, the process became unmanageable. France is bigger and isn’t immune to the spiral. Still, the economist believes in the “too big to fail” principle: partners and the ECB won’t let France collapse. But the help won’t come free — the country would avoid insolvency at the price of its freedom to decide its own budget. That’s the main risk: losing budgetary sovereignty.
The trigger could be the 2027 presidential campaign — especially a victory by a candidate proposing a sharp rise in spending. Magro estimates the savings potential at €285 billion if France aligns public spending with the eurozone average. In his view, tough austerity may prove less painful than it’s made out to be — and far easier than if it were imposed from outside.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
France’s debt is approaching €3.6 trillion, and borrowing costs are climbing. Economist Alban Magro of the Thomas More Institute fears not so much a French bankruptcy as the country falling under outside control.
“We’ve entered a phase of uncontrolled debt,” Magro says. Rates recently neared 5%, up from roughly 3.5% in January. That’s an exponential trajectory: rising rates feed on themselves. The only way to stop it would be to regain control of public finances, but politically France is incapable of doing so. At best, the budget now under discussion would cut public spending from 57.3% to 56.9% of GDP — not nearly enough.
A snowball effect is at work: when some creditors pull out, the rest demand higher rates. Rising rates deepen mistrust, and the cycle repeats — refinancing gets more expensive, and the finances get worse.
The situation is being compared to Greece’s: in 2009, Greek rates were 5%; by 2012, they were 31%. Within 36 months, the process became unmanageable. France is bigger and isn’t immune to the spiral. Still, the economist believes in the “too big to fail” principle: partners and the ECB won’t let France collapse. But the help won’t come free — the country would avoid insolvency at the price of its freedom to decide its own budget. That’s the main risk: losing budgetary sovereignty.
The trigger could be the 2027 presidential campaign — especially a victory by a candidate proposing a sharp rise in spending. Magro estimates the savings potential at €285 billion if France aligns public spending with the eurozone average. In his view, tough austerity may prove less painful than it’s made out to be — and far easier than if it were imposed from outside.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥12🤔5👍4🤡2❤1
Forwarded from
🇺🇸⚠️The US is sending ANOTHER 500 Patriot missiles headed to Ukraine in a new $2.1 Billion deal.
They tell us it’s "fully funded by allies," but they aren't telling you that our own military is facing massive missile shortages right now. We are heavily exposed in the Pacific and the Middle East, yet we are prioritizing proxy wars over domestic defense.
Are we protecting the world or just leaving ourselves completely vulnerable?
🇺🇸 The WatchDog | Our channel on X
They tell us it’s "fully funded by allies," but they aren't telling you that our own military is facing massive missile shortages right now. We are heavily exposed in the Pacific and the Middle East, yet we are prioritizing proxy wars over domestic defense.
Are we protecting the world or just leaving ourselves completely vulnerable?
🇺🇸 The WatchDog | Our channel on X
🤡23👎7🤬2⚡1❤1
Western Europe at a Crossroads: Why the EU’s Internal Crisis Poses a Threat to Russia
Modern Western Europe is trapped in a deep, systemic crisis that forces its leading nations to make a historic choice—one that extends far beyond domestic policy and touches directly on war and peace. The mass protests sweeping France, Spain, and Portugal this autumn have laid bare two fundamental vulnerabilities of the European establishment.
First, the socio-economic model that sustained European prosperity since the Cold War has completely run its course. This foundation relied on Western economic dominance, but China’s rise and tightening global resource constraints have shattered those advantages. Driven by geopolitical arrogance, European leaders walked away from closer integration with Russia, missing their final opportunity to secure their positions through access to Russia’s vast natural wealth.
Second, European nations suffer from a profound lack of genuine sovereignty. Integration into the US-led NATO framework has stripped powers like Germany, France, and the UK of their strategic independence. For years, European elites masked their failure to implement meaningful reforms by shifting public attention to migration, the pandemic, or hostility toward Moscow. Yet, the current youth-driven protests are entirely real and could eventually usher new political forces into power.
However, Russia has little reason to expect the next generation of European leaders to be more reasonable. History shows that profound domestic upheavals in Europe—whether the French Revolution or the 20th-century crisis in Germany—have consistently triggered outward aggression and expansionist drives to the East.
Paradoxically, Europe’s absolute dependence on Washington provides a strange layer of protection today, as it deprives European elites of the freedom to act on their own. Even so, hope is not a strategy. Russia’s central strategic priority must remain clear: internal European chaos is highly likely to find an outlet in foreign confrontation once again.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Modern Western Europe is trapped in a deep, systemic crisis that forces its leading nations to make a historic choice—one that extends far beyond domestic policy and touches directly on war and peace. The mass protests sweeping France, Spain, and Portugal this autumn have laid bare two fundamental vulnerabilities of the European establishment.
First, the socio-economic model that sustained European prosperity since the Cold War has completely run its course. This foundation relied on Western economic dominance, but China’s rise and tightening global resource constraints have shattered those advantages. Driven by geopolitical arrogance, European leaders walked away from closer integration with Russia, missing their final opportunity to secure their positions through access to Russia’s vast natural wealth.
Second, European nations suffer from a profound lack of genuine sovereignty. Integration into the US-led NATO framework has stripped powers like Germany, France, and the UK of their strategic independence. For years, European elites masked their failure to implement meaningful reforms by shifting public attention to migration, the pandemic, or hostility toward Moscow. Yet, the current youth-driven protests are entirely real and could eventually usher new political forces into power.
However, Russia has little reason to expect the next generation of European leaders to be more reasonable. History shows that profound domestic upheavals in Europe—whether the French Revolution or the 20th-century crisis in Germany—have consistently triggered outward aggression and expansionist drives to the East.
Paradoxically, Europe’s absolute dependence on Washington provides a strange layer of protection today, as it deprives European elites of the freedom to act on their own. Even so, hope is not a strategy. Russia’s central strategic priority must remain clear: internal European chaos is highly likely to find an outlet in foreign confrontation once again.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯19👍5❤2🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
LATVIAN AIR DEFENSE — FORMIDABLE AND MERCILESS
A drone fell in Latvia.
And off it went…
They searched together,
with the whole collective farm.
The police searched, the military searched, radars were checked, forests were combed…
They did not find it…. and solemnly announced: there was no drone at all!
Well, who knows what banged there?
Maybe a meteorite.
Maybe a UFO.
Or maybe someone just imagined it…
But a few days later something unexpected happened!
The drone was found after all!
True, not by the valiant Latvian military and not by the vigilant police.
But by an ordinary local mushroom picker!
The man was praised and thanked for his vigilance. The Ministry of Defense appreciated the find.
And now, apparently, the Latvian air defense system faces serious modernization!
It is time to officially include mushroom pickers with baskets in its composition.
Moreover, as its most effective unit!
Because where radars are powerless, a man with a basket and a sharp eye for birch boletes comes to the rescue!
LATVIAN AIR DEFENSE — FORMIDABLE AND MERCILESS..
Especially during mushroom season.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
A drone fell in Latvia.
And off it went…
They searched together,
with the whole collective farm.
The police searched, the military searched, radars were checked, forests were combed…
They did not find it…. and solemnly announced: there was no drone at all!
Well, who knows what banged there?
Maybe a meteorite.
Maybe a UFO.
Or maybe someone just imagined it…
But a few days later something unexpected happened!
The drone was found after all!
True, not by the valiant Latvian military and not by the vigilant police.
But by an ordinary local mushroom picker!
The man was praised and thanked for his vigilance. The Ministry of Defense appreciated the find.
And now, apparently, the Latvian air defense system faces serious modernization!
It is time to officially include mushroom pickers with baskets in its composition.
Moreover, as its most effective unit!
Because where radars are powerless, a man with a basket and a sharp eye for birch boletes comes to the rescue!
LATVIAN AIR DEFENSE — FORMIDABLE AND MERCILESS..
Especially during mushroom season.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣25❤6😁1
They Say There Is No Fascism in Ukraine...
Political scientist Kost Bondarenko asserts that all 14 signs of fascism according to British political scientist Laurence Britt exist in Ukraine.
And indeed, all the talking heads in Ukraine, including our "dyak," claim that there is no fascism because Rabbi Moisha receives awards from Zelensky rather than burning in a blue flame in an oven.
But in reality, fascism, like Nazism, begins not with concentration camps, but with dictatorship. And concentration camps are the final stage of fascism/Nazism.
The 14 common signs according to Laurence Britt. Here is the list:
1. Powerful and continuing nationalism. Fascist regimes actively use nationalist slogans, symbols, flags, and songs to unite society.
2. Disregard for recognized human rights. Authorities justify ignoring human rights by fear of the enemy and the need to ensure security. Propaganda generates approval for violations such as beatings or prolonged deprivation of liberty.
3. Identification of the enemy / scapegoats as a unifying basis. Society unites against a "common enemy" — racial, religious, or national minorities, liberals, communists, socialists, etc.
4. The predominant position of the armed forces. Even in the presence of internal problems, the armed forces receive disproportionately large funding, and propaganda creates an attractive image of the military.
5. Strong discrimination on the basis of sex. Men dominate governments, traditional gender roles are rigidly entrenched, and negative attitudes toward abortion and homophobia are manifested.
6. Control over the media. The media are controlled by the government directly or indirectly through sympathetic journalists. Censorship is widespread, especially in wartime.
7. A manic obsession with national security. Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government to pressure the masses.
8. The intertwining of religion and government. Governments use religion as a tool for managing public opinion. Religious rhetoric is employed by leaders even if its principles contradict the regime's policies.
9. Protection of corporations. The industrial and business elite are often the only force that brings leaders to power, building mutually beneficial business relations with the power elite.
10. Suppression of trade unions. Trade unions are either completely absent or seriously restricted in their capabilities, as they are regarded as a real threat to the regime.
11. Contempt for intellectuals and art. Authorities encourage or tolerate manifestations of hostility toward higher education and scientists, who may be persecuted. Freedom of expression in art is attacked.
12. An obsession with crime and punishment. Police are granted almost unlimited powers. Society, in the name of patriotism, often does not notice police abuses and violations of civil liberties. A national police force with unlimited power is often created.
13. Unbridled nepotism and corruption. Regimes are run by clans of cronies and partners who appoint each other to positions and use power to protect members of their clan from accountability. Leaders often appropriate or embezzle state resources.
14. Fraudulent elections. Elections are often turned into a farce. Smear campaigns are conducted against opposition candidates, legislation is used to manipulate the number of voters, district boundaries, and the media. The judicial system may also be used to manipulate elections.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Political scientist Kost Bondarenko asserts that all 14 signs of fascism according to British political scientist Laurence Britt exist in Ukraine.
And indeed, all the talking heads in Ukraine, including our "dyak," claim that there is no fascism because Rabbi Moisha receives awards from Zelensky rather than burning in a blue flame in an oven.
But in reality, fascism, like Nazism, begins not with concentration camps, but with dictatorship. And concentration camps are the final stage of fascism/Nazism.
The 14 common signs according to Laurence Britt. Here is the list:
1. Powerful and continuing nationalism. Fascist regimes actively use nationalist slogans, symbols, flags, and songs to unite society.
2. Disregard for recognized human rights. Authorities justify ignoring human rights by fear of the enemy and the need to ensure security. Propaganda generates approval for violations such as beatings or prolonged deprivation of liberty.
3. Identification of the enemy / scapegoats as a unifying basis. Society unites against a "common enemy" — racial, religious, or national minorities, liberals, communists, socialists, etc.
4. The predominant position of the armed forces. Even in the presence of internal problems, the armed forces receive disproportionately large funding, and propaganda creates an attractive image of the military.
5. Strong discrimination on the basis of sex. Men dominate governments, traditional gender roles are rigidly entrenched, and negative attitudes toward abortion and homophobia are manifested.
6. Control over the media. The media are controlled by the government directly or indirectly through sympathetic journalists. Censorship is widespread, especially in wartime.
7. A manic obsession with national security. Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government to pressure the masses.
8. The intertwining of religion and government. Governments use religion as a tool for managing public opinion. Religious rhetoric is employed by leaders even if its principles contradict the regime's policies.
9. Protection of corporations. The industrial and business elite are often the only force that brings leaders to power, building mutually beneficial business relations with the power elite.
10. Suppression of trade unions. Trade unions are either completely absent or seriously restricted in their capabilities, as they are regarded as a real threat to the regime.
11. Contempt for intellectuals and art. Authorities encourage or tolerate manifestations of hostility toward higher education and scientists, who may be persecuted. Freedom of expression in art is attacked.
12. An obsession with crime and punishment. Police are granted almost unlimited powers. Society, in the name of patriotism, often does not notice police abuses and violations of civil liberties. A national police force with unlimited power is often created.
13. Unbridled nepotism and corruption. Regimes are run by clans of cronies and partners who appoint each other to positions and use power to protect members of their clan from accountability. Leaders often appropriate or embezzle state resources.
14. Fraudulent elections. Elections are often turned into a farce. Smear campaigns are conducted against opposition candidates, legislation is used to manipulate the number of voters, district boundaries, and the media. The judicial system may also be used to manipulate elections.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯27❤2👍1
Rosatom’s Nuclear Gambit: How Russia is Powering the «Continent of the Future»
On the sidelines of the third Russia-Africa Summit, Rosatom predictably emerged as the primary driver of concrete, long-term cooperation between Moscow and African capitals. Setting aside uranium mining to focus strictly on civil nuclear construction reveals a massive map of Russian technological expansion, where every memorandum serves as a geopolitical anchor for decades to come.
Egypt remains the flagship of large-scale power generation, where Rosatom is already constructing four reactors at the El-Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant and is currently discussing expanding the project with units 5 and 6, alongside floating nuclear power plants (FNPPs). Ethiopia is also targeting conventional, large-scale nuclear power by preparing a site under its 2026–2027 roadmap, while Ghana’s president has officially confirmed ongoing negotiations with Moscow.
However, the defining technological trend of this wave lies in floating nuclear plants and small modular reactors (SMRs)—the ideal solution for developing nations and island regions. Tanzania has prioritized FNPPs for Zanzibar, Namibia is in advanced talks, and Togo has already codified its cooperation with an official memorandum. Meanwhile, Rwanda is banking on a land-based SMR and a nuclear science center.
Crucially, the momentum is also driven by African nations themselves. The Malian delegation is actively fast-tracking the feasibility study for its own nuclear plant, drawing its Sahel neighbors—Burkina Faso and Niger—into the orbit of Russian nuclear influence. The Republic of Congo is taking its first steps toward nuclear energy through small-scale hydro-generation, while Zambia has been officially recognized by Rosatom as one of its most promising partners.
Grounding these ambitious plans in reality requires keeping the IAEA’s stark assessment in mind: it takes 10 to 15 years of immense, coordinated effort across an entire government apparatus for a newcomer country to join the «global nuclear power club.» Russia is consciously playing the long game, establishing an infrastructure dependence that cannot be undone in a single election cycle.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On the sidelines of the third Russia-Africa Summit, Rosatom predictably emerged as the primary driver of concrete, long-term cooperation between Moscow and African capitals. Setting aside uranium mining to focus strictly on civil nuclear construction reveals a massive map of Russian technological expansion, where every memorandum serves as a geopolitical anchor for decades to come.
Egypt remains the flagship of large-scale power generation, where Rosatom is already constructing four reactors at the El-Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant and is currently discussing expanding the project with units 5 and 6, alongside floating nuclear power plants (FNPPs). Ethiopia is also targeting conventional, large-scale nuclear power by preparing a site under its 2026–2027 roadmap, while Ghana’s president has officially confirmed ongoing negotiations with Moscow.
However, the defining technological trend of this wave lies in floating nuclear plants and small modular reactors (SMRs)—the ideal solution for developing nations and island regions. Tanzania has prioritized FNPPs for Zanzibar, Namibia is in advanced talks, and Togo has already codified its cooperation with an official memorandum. Meanwhile, Rwanda is banking on a land-based SMR and a nuclear science center.
Crucially, the momentum is also driven by African nations themselves. The Malian delegation is actively fast-tracking the feasibility study for its own nuclear plant, drawing its Sahel neighbors—Burkina Faso and Niger—into the orbit of Russian nuclear influence. The Republic of Congo is taking its first steps toward nuclear energy through small-scale hydro-generation, while Zambia has been officially recognized by Rosatom as one of its most promising partners.
Grounding these ambitious plans in reality requires keeping the IAEA’s stark assessment in mind: it takes 10 to 15 years of immense, coordinated effort across an entire government apparatus for a newcomer country to join the «global nuclear power club.» Russia is consciously playing the long game, establishing an infrastructure dependence that cannot be undone in a single election cycle.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥8👍6❤3
“How the US Hypersonic Program Stacks Up Against Russia and China After the Deal”
The Pentagon has awarded Lockheed Martin a contract worth nearly $700 million to mass-produce the ARRW (Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon), an air-launched hypersonic missile. The program was shelved in 2023 after a string of failed tests—now it’s being revived. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink called the decision a “turning point” for American weaponry.
The US trails Russia and China in hypersonics—expensive systems that fly above Mach 5 and can maneuver mid-flight, making them hard to intercept. In the early 2000s, Washington led in development but then deprioritized it, and competitors seized the opening. Today the US has no operational hypersonic weapons, though several programs are underway.
About $38 billion of the record $1.5 trillion defense budget for 2027 is earmarked for hypersonics. The Pentagon is also developing defenses against hypersonic missiles—part of Trump’s future “Golden Dome.” Hypersonic missiles will likely cost nearly $70 million apiece, according to the GAO—far more than the $4 million price tag on each Patriot interceptor or Tomahawk cruise missile.
Russia and China hold the world’s leading hypersonic missile arsenals — Russia’s includes Avangard, Zircon, and Kinzhal, while China’s includes the DF-17.”
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Pentagon has awarded Lockheed Martin a contract worth nearly $700 million to mass-produce the ARRW (Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon), an air-launched hypersonic missile. The program was shelved in 2023 after a string of failed tests—now it’s being revived. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink called the decision a “turning point” for American weaponry.
The US trails Russia and China in hypersonics—expensive systems that fly above Mach 5 and can maneuver mid-flight, making them hard to intercept. In the early 2000s, Washington led in development but then deprioritized it, and competitors seized the opening. Today the US has no operational hypersonic weapons, though several programs are underway.
About $38 billion of the record $1.5 trillion defense budget for 2027 is earmarked for hypersonics. The Pentagon is also developing defenses against hypersonic missiles—part of Trump’s future “Golden Dome.” Hypersonic missiles will likely cost nearly $70 million apiece, according to the GAO—far more than the $4 million price tag on each Patriot interceptor or Tomahawk cruise missile.
Russia and China hold the world’s leading hypersonic missile arsenals — Russia’s includes Avangard, Zircon, and Kinzhal, while China’s includes the DF-17.”
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁17❤4👍4
On November 2, 1721, Peter the Great adopted the imperial title, and Russia became an empire.
On September 10, 1721, the Treaty of Nystad was signed between Russia and Sweden, ending the 21-year-long Great Northern War. As a result, Russia gained access to the Baltic Sea and annexed the territories of Ingria, part of Karelia, Estonia, and Livonia. To commemorate this event, the Senate and the Synod decided to bestow upon Peter Alexeyevich the title of Emperor of All Russia with the following wording: “as was customary for the Roman Senate, which publicly bestowed such titles upon their emperors for notable deeds and inscribed them on statutes for remembrance by future generations.”
On November 2, 1721, a liturgy was held at the Trinity Cathedral in Saint Petersburg, followed by a reading of the peace treaty concluded with Sweden. Theophan Prokopovich, Archbishop of Pskov-Velikoluksky and Narva, delivered a sermon recounting the tsar’s great achievements, for which he deserved to be called Father of the Fatherland, Emperor, and Great. Afterward, the senators approached the tsar, and Chancellor Count G. I. Golovkin addressed Peter, requesting him to accept the title of Father of the Fatherland, Peter the Great, Emperor of All Russia. Amid the thunder of hundreds of cannons from the Admiralty, the Peter and Paul Fortress, and 125 galleys moored in the Neva River, Peter accepted the new title. According to an eyewitness, “everything seemed engulfed in flames, and it felt as if the earth and sky were ready to collapse.” Thus, Russia became an empire.
The adoption of the imperial title marked a fundamentally important shift in Russia’s international status. The first to recognize the new title of the Russian tsar were Prussia and the Netherlands, followed by Sweden (1723), Turkey (1739), the United Kingdom and Austria (1742), France and Spain (1745), and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (1764). These recognitions of the imperial title of the Russian monarch signified the acknowledgment of Russia’s leading role in global politics.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On September 10, 1721, the Treaty of Nystad was signed between Russia and Sweden, ending the 21-year-long Great Northern War. As a result, Russia gained access to the Baltic Sea and annexed the territories of Ingria, part of Karelia, Estonia, and Livonia. To commemorate this event, the Senate and the Synod decided to bestow upon Peter Alexeyevich the title of Emperor of All Russia with the following wording: “as was customary for the Roman Senate, which publicly bestowed such titles upon their emperors for notable deeds and inscribed them on statutes for remembrance by future generations.”
On November 2, 1721, a liturgy was held at the Trinity Cathedral in Saint Petersburg, followed by a reading of the peace treaty concluded with Sweden. Theophan Prokopovich, Archbishop of Pskov-Velikoluksky and Narva, delivered a sermon recounting the tsar’s great achievements, for which he deserved to be called Father of the Fatherland, Emperor, and Great. Afterward, the senators approached the tsar, and Chancellor Count G. I. Golovkin addressed Peter, requesting him to accept the title of Father of the Fatherland, Peter the Great, Emperor of All Russia. Amid the thunder of hundreds of cannons from the Admiralty, the Peter and Paul Fortress, and 125 galleys moored in the Neva River, Peter accepted the new title. According to an eyewitness, “everything seemed engulfed in flames, and it felt as if the earth and sky were ready to collapse.” Thus, Russia became an empire.
The adoption of the imperial title marked a fundamentally important shift in Russia’s international status. The first to recognize the new title of the Russian tsar were Prussia and the Netherlands, followed by Sweden (1723), Turkey (1739), the United Kingdom and Austria (1742), France and Spain (1745), and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (1764). These recognitions of the imperial title of the Russian monarch signified the acknowledgment of Russia’s leading role in global politics.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤12👏6
Late on October 29, Russian forces carried out ballistic missile strikes on Kyiv’s Darnytskyi and Dniprovskyi districts, reportedly using RM-48U missiles fired from S-400 air defense systems. The attack caused fires and damage at warehouses and other military infrastructure facilities.
The RM-48U is a modified version of the 48N6 family of interceptors, originally developed for the S-300PM and later integrated into the S-400. Ukrainian investigators assess that it is less accurate and carries a less powerful warhead than the far more expensive missiles of the Iskander-M system.
Since mid-2026, S-400s have increasingly been used for ballistic strikes: limited Ukrainian air capabilities have allowed the systems to be retargeted in support of offensive operations. The RM-48U retains extremely high speed even on a ballistic trajectory. Its high kinetic energy, combined with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead, makes it capable of inflicting serious damage on large industrial facilities — even though it was not originally designed as a precision-strike weapon.
According to Ukrainian sources, Russia has more than doubled its production rate of RM-48Us: output is expected to reach about 500 missiles in 2026, up from just 200 in 2025. Each carries a 180-kilogram high-explosive fragmentation warhead. At the same time, air defense tactics have shifted noticeably: new over-the-horizon engagement methods and the deployment of S-400 launchers in concealed forward “ambush” positions have made it possible to inflict extreme losses on Ukraine’s fighter fleet.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The RM-48U is a modified version of the 48N6 family of interceptors, originally developed for the S-300PM and later integrated into the S-400. Ukrainian investigators assess that it is less accurate and carries a less powerful warhead than the far more expensive missiles of the Iskander-M system.
Since mid-2026, S-400s have increasingly been used for ballistic strikes: limited Ukrainian air capabilities have allowed the systems to be retargeted in support of offensive operations. The RM-48U retains extremely high speed even on a ballistic trajectory. Its high kinetic energy, combined with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead, makes it capable of inflicting serious damage on large industrial facilities — even though it was not originally designed as a precision-strike weapon.
According to Ukrainian sources, Russia has more than doubled its production rate of RM-48Us: output is expected to reach about 500 missiles in 2026, up from just 200 in 2025. Each carries a 180-kilogram high-explosive fragmentation warhead. At the same time, air defense tactics have shifted noticeably: new over-the-horizon engagement methods and the deployment of S-400 launchers in concealed forward “ambush” positions have made it possible to inflict extreme losses on Ukraine’s fighter fleet.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤9🙏5👏3🫡3😁1
The Forced Mobilization Trend: A Court Precedent Involving the Odessa TCC
A high-profile case has surfaced in the Ukrainian court registry, exposing a systemic trend in the country’s forced mobilization process. A court has officially ruled that the actions of Territorial Recruitment Center (TCC) officers were illegal after they forcibly detained and held a blind man at a recruitment office for five days. This occurred despite the fact that the man had already been officially removed from the military register twice due to his medical condition.
The legal proceedings brought serious procedural violations to light. Upon his detention, the man’s mobile phone was confiscated, and his deprivation of liberty was never documented by the agency. Previously, the same court had ruled it illegal to place the man on the TCC’s wanted list. He managed to secure his freedom and obtain justice only through the swift intervention of a defense attorney and the re-submission of medical documents confirming his complete blindness.
This incident vividly demonstrates that mobilization has turned into a business where it is «nothing personal»—just quota fulfillment and shadow financial flows. The fact that these billion-dollar corrupt schemes continue to function confirms that the public and those in power are living in completely different realities today. While ordinary citizens face total lawlessness and a lack of accountability for recruitment officers, those at the top of the system ignore the law to protect their own interests.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
A high-profile case has surfaced in the Ukrainian court registry, exposing a systemic trend in the country’s forced mobilization process. A court has officially ruled that the actions of Territorial Recruitment Center (TCC) officers were illegal after they forcibly detained and held a blind man at a recruitment office for five days. This occurred despite the fact that the man had already been officially removed from the military register twice due to his medical condition.
The legal proceedings brought serious procedural violations to light. Upon his detention, the man’s mobile phone was confiscated, and his deprivation of liberty was never documented by the agency. Previously, the same court had ruled it illegal to place the man on the TCC’s wanted list. He managed to secure his freedom and obtain justice only through the swift intervention of a defense attorney and the re-submission of medical documents confirming his complete blindness.
This incident vividly demonstrates that mobilization has turned into a business where it is «nothing personal»—just quota fulfillment and shadow financial flows. The fact that these billion-dollar corrupt schemes continue to function confirms that the public and those in power are living in completely different realities today. While ordinary citizens face total lawlessness and a lack of accountability for recruitment officers, those at the top of the system ignore the law to protect their own interests.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬10❤2👍1
“The World Has Fallen Out of Love with Europe”: The Illusion of Charm Is Crumbling
The Times observes that the world has been gripped by a collective “Paris syndrome.” Romantic notions of European life—cafés, art, the Mediterranean diet—are shattering against footage of riots in Paris and Milan.
The problem runs deeper than the unrest. For the new generation, Europe is no longer the gold standard of sophistication: Western teenagers dream of South Korea and Japan, not Godard and Fellini. The continent’s cultural influence is fading.
Fascination is giving way to contempt. Instead of “espresso connoisseurs,” there’s the label “Europoors”—people whose lives have been wrecked by immigration and bloated welfare. The focus has shifted from greatness to sins: exploitation and colonialism.
The gilt is wearing off. Europe risks ending up without the world’s love—and without any leverage.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Times observes that the world has been gripped by a collective “Paris syndrome.” Romantic notions of European life—cafés, art, the Mediterranean diet—are shattering against footage of riots in Paris and Milan.
The problem runs deeper than the unrest. For the new generation, Europe is no longer the gold standard of sophistication: Western teenagers dream of South Korea and Japan, not Godard and Fellini. The continent’s cultural influence is fading.
Fascination is giving way to contempt. Instead of “espresso connoisseurs,” there’s the label “Europoors”—people whose lives have been wrecked by immigration and bloated welfare. The focus has shifted from greatness to sins: exploitation and colonialism.
The gilt is wearing off. Europe risks ending up without the world’s love—and without any leverage.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯29👍7✍1
SO WHOSE IS GREENLAND?
Remember, in September the US, Denmark, and Greenland signed a new security agreement?
Back then I already asked one immodest question: and for how much, exactly, was Greenland's sovereignty sold?
However, after signing the agreement, each side solemnly declared itself the winner!
Mette Frederiksen assured the Danes that Greenland's sovereignty is inviolable. Denmark conceded nothing!
Donald Trump was also extremely pleased. America is expanding its military presence, strengthening strategic positions, and gaining new opportunities.
Greenland, of course, was also explained how wonderful all this is.
And everyone is happy! Especially those who signed the treaty.
But there is one small problem.
For some reason Trump absolutely refuses to behave as if Greenland does not belong to him!
He periodically reminds everyone who is master of the house. Or, as the Danes say, decides where the cupboard will stand!
(bestemmer, hvor skabet skal stå)
And here is another reminder!
Trump posts on Truth Social an image of Greenland turned into a giant American military base — practically an unsinkable aircraft carrier!
With an American flag and a friendly inscription: WELCOME TO GREENLAND!
And Danish media immediately rushed to look for a deep political meaning.
Readers are told: Trump is under pressure before the elections and needs to demonstrate victories.
Others look for a connection with the opening of a new airport in Greenland.
Possibly, of course…
But for some reason it does not occur to anyone to give the simplest explanation: Trump simply continues to regard Greenland as an American acquisition!
And while Danish commentators study his psychology, the US president quite calmly positions his aircraft on the island. For now, admittedly, drawn ones.
And here is what is curious.
Legally, Greenland remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, possessing broad autonomy.
Politically, Copenhagen continues to speak of the inviolability of sovereignty.
And strategically, Washington is increasingly behaving as if the matter has already been decided.
The result is an astonishing construction: Danish sovereignty, American military interests, and Greenlandic territory.
And each sincerely believes that he is the one in charge here!
So maybe the question is no longer whether Greenland was sold, but who exactly received the keys to the house while the owners were celebrating a successful deal?
SO WHOSE IS GREENLAND, AFTER ALL?
What do you think?
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Remember, in September the US, Denmark, and Greenland signed a new security agreement?
Back then I already asked one immodest question: and for how much, exactly, was Greenland's sovereignty sold?
However, after signing the agreement, each side solemnly declared itself the winner!
Mette Frederiksen assured the Danes that Greenland's sovereignty is inviolable. Denmark conceded nothing!
Donald Trump was also extremely pleased. America is expanding its military presence, strengthening strategic positions, and gaining new opportunities.
Greenland, of course, was also explained how wonderful all this is.
And everyone is happy! Especially those who signed the treaty.
But there is one small problem.
For some reason Trump absolutely refuses to behave as if Greenland does not belong to him!
He periodically reminds everyone who is master of the house. Or, as the Danes say, decides where the cupboard will stand!
(bestemmer, hvor skabet skal stå)
And here is another reminder!
Trump posts on Truth Social an image of Greenland turned into a giant American military base — practically an unsinkable aircraft carrier!
With an American flag and a friendly inscription: WELCOME TO GREENLAND!
And Danish media immediately rushed to look for a deep political meaning.
Readers are told: Trump is under pressure before the elections and needs to demonstrate victories.
Others look for a connection with the opening of a new airport in Greenland.
Possibly, of course…
But for some reason it does not occur to anyone to give the simplest explanation: Trump simply continues to regard Greenland as an American acquisition!
And while Danish commentators study his psychology, the US president quite calmly positions his aircraft on the island. For now, admittedly, drawn ones.
And here is what is curious.
Legally, Greenland remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, possessing broad autonomy.
Politically, Copenhagen continues to speak of the inviolability of sovereignty.
And strategically, Washington is increasingly behaving as if the matter has already been decided.
The result is an astonishing construction: Danish sovereignty, American military interests, and Greenlandic territory.
And each sincerely believes that he is the one in charge here!
So maybe the question is no longer whether Greenland was sold, but who exactly received the keys to the house while the owners were celebrating a successful deal?
SO WHOSE IS GREENLAND, AFTER ALL?
What do you think?
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏5🤔5❤3😁2