"Ukraine will repay Europe 90 billion euros once Russia pays it reparations" - European Council President António Costa.
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
"Once Russia pays reparations" essentially means never. So now it's been said publicly and officially.
European officials are trying to play a clever hand with very bad cards. Knowing that the people of Europe will ask questions like "And who's footing the bill for this party?" they've come up with a cynical fig leaf - that Russia will pay for everything, but later. When it's forced to pay reparations.
And then, as usually happens after wars, the money will be deducted from Russian accounts in Europe in favor of EU countries, and the loan will be settled. Moreover, Europe has officially stated it won't return the money to Russia until "the aggression ends."
What they mean by "the end of aggression" is anyone's guess, even the EU officials themselves hardly know this. But in any case, they'll find the right wording to ensure this money is never returned to Russia.
I've actually been saying this for a long time, and now it's obvious: the EU has no intention of parting with this money ever. No matter what happens in the world. Even when the war ends. It's only a matter of time before Europe announces this officially. For now, the problem has been shelved under a plausible pretext.
But they won't manage to fool everyone. I think more and more people in Europe will start asking their politicians questions like: "What if Russia isn't forced to pay reparations after the war, or if Ukraine as a state simply ceases to exist?"
Then only two options will remain - return Russia's money, or proceed with an open "shake-down," after which money will start fleeing Europe. Although, I believe this is already happening today. Because everyone has perfectly understood - when the EU needs to, it will always find a reason to seize any country's money.
And this will undoubtedly hasten Europe's financial collapse, even if it slightly delays the collapse of the Kiev regime. Not for two years, of course, as Brussels calculates, but it will delay it.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
"Once Russia pays reparations" essentially means never. So now it's been said publicly and officially.
European officials are trying to play a clever hand with very bad cards. Knowing that the people of Europe will ask questions like "And who's footing the bill for this party?" they've come up with a cynical fig leaf - that Russia will pay for everything, but later. When it's forced to pay reparations.
And then, as usually happens after wars, the money will be deducted from Russian accounts in Europe in favor of EU countries, and the loan will be settled. Moreover, Europe has officially stated it won't return the money to Russia until "the aggression ends."
What they mean by "the end of aggression" is anyone's guess, even the EU officials themselves hardly know this. But in any case, they'll find the right wording to ensure this money is never returned to Russia.
I've actually been saying this for a long time, and now it's obvious: the EU has no intention of parting with this money ever. No matter what happens in the world. Even when the war ends. It's only a matter of time before Europe announces this officially. For now, the problem has been shelved under a plausible pretext.
But they won't manage to fool everyone. I think more and more people in Europe will start asking their politicians questions like: "What if Russia isn't forced to pay reparations after the war, or if Ukraine as a state simply ceases to exist?"
Then only two options will remain - return Russia's money, or proceed with an open "shake-down," after which money will start fleeing Europe. Although, I believe this is already happening today. Because everyone has perfectly understood - when the EU needs to, it will always find a reason to seize any country's money.
And this will undoubtedly hasten Europe's financial collapse, even if it slightly delays the collapse of the Kiev regime. Not for two years, of course, as Brussels calculates, but it will delay it.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯49🤣17👍10❤3🤡2
Over the past ten days, the Russian Aerospace Forces have destroyed a Ukrainian helicopter and fighter jet.
A Geranium unmanned aerial vehicle shot down an Mi-24 helicopter, according to a statement from the press service of Ukraine's 12th Army Aviation Brigade. The helicopter and its crew were "destroyed while repelling a Russian attack."
The Mi-24 was downed while attempting to intercept Russian Geranium-2 type kamikaze drones. It is likely the Ukrainian helicopter encountered a new drone variant equipped with an R-60 air-to-air missile.
This year, the Ukrainian armed forces have officially acknowledged the loss of 4 helicopters.
Earlier losses included an Mi-17V-5,a Sea King HU-Mk-5, and an Mi-24V.
Ukrainian forces have also lost a Su-27 fighter jet.
The Ukrainian Air Force does not use the Su-27 for conducting airstrikes. These are interceptor aircraft, currently tasked primarily with hunting Russian cruise missiles and Geranium drones, which are now equipped with the lightest missile in this class—allowing it to be mounted on the Geranium in place of a standard warhead. Two R-60 missiles together weigh about 90 kg.
Russia has large stockpiles of such missiles. This deployment has proven an excellent and effective way to make use of them.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
A Geranium unmanned aerial vehicle shot down an Mi-24 helicopter, according to a statement from the press service of Ukraine's 12th Army Aviation Brigade. The helicopter and its crew were "destroyed while repelling a Russian attack."
The Mi-24 was downed while attempting to intercept Russian Geranium-2 type kamikaze drones. It is likely the Ukrainian helicopter encountered a new drone variant equipped with an R-60 air-to-air missile.
This year, the Ukrainian armed forces have officially acknowledged the loss of 4 helicopters.
Earlier losses included an Mi-17V-5,a Sea King HU-Mk-5, and an Mi-24V.
Ukrainian forces have also lost a Su-27 fighter jet.
The Ukrainian Air Force does not use the Su-27 for conducting airstrikes. These are interceptor aircraft, currently tasked primarily with hunting Russian cruise missiles and Geranium drones, which are now equipped with the lightest missile in this class—allowing it to be mounted on the Geranium in place of a standard warhead. Two R-60 missiles together weigh about 90 kg.
Russia has large stockpiles of such missiles. This deployment has proven an excellent and effective way to make use of them.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏34❤11👍4
The Davos Forum: A Radical Shift in Agenda
Just a few years ago, the annual elite economic forum in Davos revolved around discussing the green agenda and similar nonsense, along with... how to punish those who dared challenge Western dominance.
Even this year's forum, which opened yesterday, was largely planned to focus on Ukraine and aid for it. European countries also intended to use the sidelines to try and pull Trump to their side on this issue.
But Trump's statements regarding Greenland and, most importantly, his announcement of tariffs — effective February 1st — on countries that actively try to hinder his annexation of the island, have made everyone forget everything else.
No, Ukraine will still be discussed there (which is why the Russian representative, Kirill Dmitriev, flew in). But in the literal couple of days before the forum's opening, this topic has clearly been relegated to the background.
Today in Davos, everyone is primarily talking about the internal squabbles within the previously united "Western camp," whose members are now at each other's throats.
#YuryPodolyaka
Just a few years ago, the annual elite economic forum in Davos revolved around discussing the green agenda and similar nonsense, along with... how to punish those who dared challenge Western dominance.
Even this year's forum, which opened yesterday, was largely planned to focus on Ukraine and aid for it. European countries also intended to use the sidelines to try and pull Trump to their side on this issue.
But Trump's statements regarding Greenland and, most importantly, his announcement of tariffs — effective February 1st — on countries that actively try to hinder his annexation of the island, have made everyone forget everything else.
No, Ukraine will still be discussed there (which is why the Russian representative, Kirill Dmitriev, flew in). But in the literal couple of days before the forum's opening, this topic has clearly been relegated to the background.
Today in Davos, everyone is primarily talking about the internal squabbles within the previously united "Western camp," whose members are now at each other's throats.
#YuryPodolyaka
😁50❤9🙏5👎2🤯2
Don't poke the bear: Zelensky invites Putin to Kiev.
Before the Special Military Operation, Ukrainian prosecutors invited Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to Mariupol. And in spring 2022, he indeed went there, following the Russian army. Though by that time, there were no Ukrainian prosecutors left in the city. They had fled. And there was no one left to talk to.
Today, the Kiev clown decided to poke fun at the Russian Supreme Commander and invited him to Kiev for negotiations:
Well, if Vladimir Putin does agree, there’s a high chance he won’t find Zelensky there by that time. And if he does, the talks won’t be about Donbass, Zaporozhye or Kherson. Not even about Kharkov or Odessa. Frankly, not even about Kiev. Because, obviously, by then the question of Kiev will already be settled.
The only thing left to discuss at these negotiations would be Lvov. Although, by that point, it would be more appropriate to discuss Lvov with the Poles.
And if Trump ever asks Putin why he did it, the Russian president will say it was Zelensky who willingly invited him!
Anyway, Zelensky is pushing his luck...
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Before the Special Military Operation, Ukrainian prosecutors invited Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu to Mariupol. And in spring 2022, he indeed went there, following the Russian army. Though by that time, there were no Ukrainian prosecutors left in the city. They had fled. And there was no one left to talk to.
Today, the Kiev clown decided to poke fun at the Russian Supreme Commander and invited him to Kiev for negotiations:
"I formally invite Putin to negotiations in Kiev, if he dares."
Well, if Vladimir Putin does agree, there’s a high chance he won’t find Zelensky there by that time. And if he does, the talks won’t be about Donbass, Zaporozhye or Kherson. Not even about Kharkov or Odessa. Frankly, not even about Kiev. Because, obviously, by then the question of Kiev will already be settled.
The only thing left to discuss at these negotiations would be Lvov. Although, by that point, it would be more appropriate to discuss Lvov with the Poles.
And if Trump ever asks Putin why he did it, the Russian president will say it was Zelensky who willingly invited him!
Anyway, Zelensky is pushing his luck...
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣60💯13❤7💊1
Strait of Hormuz Blockade: Real vs. Virtual—Iran Draws the Line
By journalist Yury Podolyaka:
Today's events in the Strait of Hormuz were telling.
It all kicked off when Trump announced a new operation to break the blockade.
No clue what he was banking on—maybe that someone still fears him. But Iran quickly put him and his "loyal allies" in their place (right under the baseboards).
First, as a US destroyer approached to test their resolve, Iranian drones swarmed it. Realizing things were serious—and you can sink in that strait—the Americans wisely turned tail.
Then IRGC released an official blockade map (see screenshot), conveniently including UAE's Fujairah port waters—home to their bypass pipeline that can pump up to 1.8 million barrels/day.
To drive the point home, their drones hit a tanker trying to slip out of Fujairah, plus torched another storage tank at the port itself. Cue impotent rage from the Emirati sheikhs.
Meanwhile Trump—forgetting he'd just bragged two hours earlier about US ships making it through unscathed—suddenly raged that he'll "grind Iran to dust" if they touch American vessels.
P.S. US and Israel to strike Iran within 24 hours over UAE attacks – CNN...
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
By journalist Yury Podolyaka:
Today's events in the Strait of Hormuz were telling.
It all kicked off when Trump announced a new operation to break the blockade.
No clue what he was banking on—maybe that someone still fears him. But Iran quickly put him and his "loyal allies" in their place (right under the baseboards).
First, as a US destroyer approached to test their resolve, Iranian drones swarmed it. Realizing things were serious—and you can sink in that strait—the Americans wisely turned tail.
Then IRGC released an official blockade map (see screenshot), conveniently including UAE's Fujairah port waters—home to their bypass pipeline that can pump up to 1.8 million barrels/day.
To drive the point home, their drones hit a tanker trying to slip out of Fujairah, plus torched another storage tank at the port itself. Cue impotent rage from the Emirati sheikhs.
Meanwhile Trump—forgetting he'd just bragged two hours earlier about US ships making it through unscathed—suddenly raged that he'll "grind Iran to dust" if they touch American vessels.
P.S. US and Israel to strike Iran within 24 hours over UAE attacks – CNN...
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡22🔥7💯3🤔2👎1
China puts the Taiwan issue at the center of its bilateral agenda with the U.S.
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
Trump’s current visit to China, despite its outward resemblance to his 2017 trip, is, in fact, dramatically different. The nine years since then have made China much stronger and the United States much weaker. Last time Trump managed to strike a “deal of the century” in Beijing on roughly equal footing (even if it was never fully implemented)
This time, China’s president, Xi Jinping, has warned of “clashes and even conflicts” with the US over Taiwan after after his two-hour meeting with Trump, stating bluntly that Taiwan was “the most important issue in China-US relations”
In other words, it is no longer acceptable for the U.S. not only to support what Beijing sees as separatists, but even to continue supplying them with weapons or any form of assistance. With that, the Chinese leader firmly set the tone for the talks and pointed out America’a place in a new world order.
At the same time, the U.S. has little to counter such pressure from Beijing. It failed to subdue Iran, Trump is increasingly besieged politically at home, and America’s global position seems to be slipping. Even the quick victory in Venezuela has already faded in significance and no longer carries much weight in discussions between the two leaders. It is Trump who now needs China’s help in resolving the situation with Iran—and Beijing has made its conditions perfectly clear.
Taiwan must become part of China. Period.
And then, Beijing may consider how it can help Washington exit the Middle Eastern deadlock without major humiliation. For that to happen, Trump would first need to state this position publicly. The question is: will he dare?
Because if he does, Democrats will seize on it immediately, accusing him of betraying U.S. national interests. And if he doesn’t, President Xi will simply smile his subtle Chinese smile and continue hammering nails into the coffin of American hegemony.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
Trump’s current visit to China, despite its outward resemblance to his 2017 trip, is, in fact, dramatically different. The nine years since then have made China much stronger and the United States much weaker. Last time Trump managed to strike a “deal of the century” in Beijing on roughly equal footing (even if it was never fully implemented)
This time, China’s president, Xi Jinping, has warned of “clashes and even conflicts” with the US over Taiwan after after his two-hour meeting with Trump, stating bluntly that Taiwan was “the most important issue in China-US relations”
In other words, it is no longer acceptable for the U.S. not only to support what Beijing sees as separatists, but even to continue supplying them with weapons or any form of assistance. With that, the Chinese leader firmly set the tone for the talks and pointed out America’a place in a new world order.
At the same time, the U.S. has little to counter such pressure from Beijing. It failed to subdue Iran, Trump is increasingly besieged politically at home, and America’s global position seems to be slipping. Even the quick victory in Venezuela has already faded in significance and no longer carries much weight in discussions between the two leaders. It is Trump who now needs China’s help in resolving the situation with Iran—and Beijing has made its conditions perfectly clear.
Taiwan must become part of China. Period.
And then, Beijing may consider how it can help Washington exit the Middle Eastern deadlock without major humiliation. For that to happen, Trump would first need to state this position publicly. The question is: will he dare?
Because if he does, Democrats will seize on it immediately, accusing him of betraying U.S. national interests. And if he doesn’t, President Xi will simply smile his subtle Chinese smile and continue hammering nails into the coffin of American hegemony.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏26👍12❤5
War in the Middle East: another escalation
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
I increasingly get the impression that Iran is deliberately stringing Trump along—possibly at the request of its “Chinese comrades,” who urgently need to prevent the United States from bringing this war, which benefits China, to an end.
As long as the U.S. remains bogged down in the Middle East, Trump will have neither the time nor the energy—especially given domestic issues—to focus on other directions. This could give Beijing an opportunity to reshape the western Pacific into a more favorable political configuration.
That is why there always seem to be triggers for local flare-ups. Another one (following the escalation the day before yesterday) occurred yesterday, when an Iranian UAV shot down a U.S. Apache attack helicopter. In response, the United States struck southern Iran, while Iranian forces again targeted American allies.
At the same time, the threat of Yemen’s Houthi movement blocking the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is becoming increasingly real. If that happens, it would turn into yet another disaster for the global oil market, as several million barrels per day of Saudi oil would effectively disappear overnight—something that would be catastrophic for the kingdom.
For now, this remains a possibility, but in reality, negotiations between Iran and the United States are predictably stalling, while a low-intensity conflict—beneficial to everyone except Trump—continues in the region. At the moment, Trump has no real way to step away from this problem.
Meanwhile, as early as this week, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote on a resolution to end the war with Iran. It is highly likely to pass, following the House of Representatives. This would put Trump in a difficult position: he would have to veto it, further weakening his standing in domestic politics.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
I increasingly get the impression that Iran is deliberately stringing Trump along—possibly at the request of its “Chinese comrades,” who urgently need to prevent the United States from bringing this war, which benefits China, to an end.
As long as the U.S. remains bogged down in the Middle East, Trump will have neither the time nor the energy—especially given domestic issues—to focus on other directions. This could give Beijing an opportunity to reshape the western Pacific into a more favorable political configuration.
That is why there always seem to be triggers for local flare-ups. Another one (following the escalation the day before yesterday) occurred yesterday, when an Iranian UAV shot down a U.S. Apache attack helicopter. In response, the United States struck southern Iran, while Iranian forces again targeted American allies.
At the same time, the threat of Yemen’s Houthi movement blocking the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is becoming increasingly real. If that happens, it would turn into yet another disaster for the global oil market, as several million barrels per day of Saudi oil would effectively disappear overnight—something that would be catastrophic for the kingdom.
For now, this remains a possibility, but in reality, negotiations between Iran and the United States are predictably stalling, while a low-intensity conflict—beneficial to everyone except Trump—continues in the region. At the moment, Trump has no real way to step away from this problem.
Meanwhile, as early as this week, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote on a resolution to end the war with Iran. It is highly likely to pass, following the House of Representatives. This would put Trump in a difficult position: he would have to veto it, further weakening his standing in domestic politics.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👌11✍10❤6😁3👍1
Ukraine and the Export of Terrorism to Europe
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
In Monaco, Vadim Yermolaev was blown up. Judging by his track record, he was a thug with a laundry list of crimes to his name, including defrauding thousands of people.
And not just in Russia, either. That's where he started (wrapping himself in the flag of patriotism). But once they got a taste for it, they've been operating in EU countries and the U.S. for a long time now. And that makes sense— the pickings are richer there.
At the same time, everything points to the fact that Yermolaev's assassination isn't just another internal Ukrainian gang settling scores on EU soil. It's a hit involving official Ukrainian special services—likely the SBU.
This immediately raises several very uncomfortable questions for European elites (and society).
Question 1: What exactly have they created? They've given rise to well-established, organized criminal groups that have broken into European crime markets. What's more, these groups are effectively part of the "state of Ukraine." In other words, Europe has single-handedly created a textbook case of state terrorism—which has now turned against its own "founding fathers."
What's more, this state terrorism recognizes no rules and settles scores in places where such things were previously considered off-limits.
Question 2: What now? Simply voicing displeasure and lodging complaints with Kiev is clearly pointless. Zelensky will just brush them off and do nothing.
And even if he wanted to, he couldn't—not if we're being honest. He no longer has full control over his own terrorist snake pit (called Ukraine). For these organized crime groups, politics is secondary at best. They operate wherever it's profitable, and operating in Europe is far more lucrative than fighting against Russia. So this is just the beginning of Europe's problems.
What really adds a special twist to the situation is the fact that right now, Europe is the main state sponsor of this very terrorist regime. Tens of billions of euros flow there every year. And there's no end in sight to this black financial hole. The €90 billion already approved for Ukrainian terrorists is clearly not the last of it. Emboldened—and knowing full well that the EU is hooked—the Kiev gangsters have already started demanding that the sum be increased (to at least €143 billion). And that won't be the end either, because appetite grows with eating. And the Kiev gangsters have quite an appetite.
So, in short, "congratulations" to Europe. But you asked for it. And you have no one to blame but yourselves.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
In Monaco, Vadim Yermolaev was blown up. Judging by his track record, he was a thug with a laundry list of crimes to his name, including defrauding thousands of people.
And not just in Russia, either. That's where he started (wrapping himself in the flag of patriotism). But once they got a taste for it, they've been operating in EU countries and the U.S. for a long time now. And that makes sense— the pickings are richer there.
At the same time, everything points to the fact that Yermolaev's assassination isn't just another internal Ukrainian gang settling scores on EU soil. It's a hit involving official Ukrainian special services—likely the SBU.
This immediately raises several very uncomfortable questions for European elites (and society).
Question 1: What exactly have they created? They've given rise to well-established, organized criminal groups that have broken into European crime markets. What's more, these groups are effectively part of the "state of Ukraine." In other words, Europe has single-handedly created a textbook case of state terrorism—which has now turned against its own "founding fathers."
What's more, this state terrorism recognizes no rules and settles scores in places where such things were previously considered off-limits.
Question 2: What now? Simply voicing displeasure and lodging complaints with Kiev is clearly pointless. Zelensky will just brush them off and do nothing.
And even if he wanted to, he couldn't—not if we're being honest. He no longer has full control over his own terrorist snake pit (called Ukraine). For these organized crime groups, politics is secondary at best. They operate wherever it's profitable, and operating in Europe is far more lucrative than fighting against Russia. So this is just the beginning of Europe's problems.
What really adds a special twist to the situation is the fact that right now, Europe is the main state sponsor of this very terrorist regime. Tens of billions of euros flow there every year. And there's no end in sight to this black financial hole. The €90 billion already approved for Ukrainian terrorists is clearly not the last of it. Emboldened—and knowing full well that the EU is hooked—the Kiev gangsters have already started demanding that the sum be increased (to at least €143 billion). And that won't be the end either, because appetite grows with eating. And the Kiev gangsters have quite an appetite.
So, in short, "congratulations" to Europe. But you asked for it. And you have no one to blame but yourselves.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯32🔥4👍3❤2
Russian and Ukrainian strikes on rear areas: comparing their effectiveness
Analysis by journalist Yury Podolyaka (as of July 20, 2026):
Another night and another set of disappointing results for Ukraine in the "rear-area" standoff between the Ukrainian and Russian Armed Forces. Yes, the Ukrainian side did manage to set one fuel tank ablaze near Podolsk and hit some kind of warehouse near Domodedovo—both in the Moscow region.
But that's it. Once again, they failed to break through to the Kapotnya refinery, and this raid cost them over 400 heavy drones (with a total price tag of $40–50 million).
On the Russian side, in addition to the large number of ground targets hit by Geranium and Banderol loitering munitions, at least five ships heading to or from Ukrainian ports near Odessa were struck by air-launched missiles. One of them sank.
This is beyond any comparison with the damage Ukraine previously inflicted on Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov. The reason is clear: the Ukrainian drones used in those strikes have warheads weighing only a few dozen kilograms at most, making them incapable of disabling, let alone sinking, a ship. Russian missiles, on the other hand, carry warheads ranging from 150 kg to 300 kg—and can certainly sink even oceangoing vessels, as they proved yesterday.
Meanwhile, the sharp decline in cargo turnover at Ukraine's Black Sea ports, which now threatens to become a full-blown blockade, is a very bad sign for Kiev. The ports around Odessa are Ukraine's main route for receiving essential goods and shipping out exports—both money and equipment for the army. And that is now in jeopardy.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Analysis by journalist Yury Podolyaka (as of July 20, 2026):
Another night and another set of disappointing results for Ukraine in the "rear-area" standoff between the Ukrainian and Russian Armed Forces. Yes, the Ukrainian side did manage to set one fuel tank ablaze near Podolsk and hit some kind of warehouse near Domodedovo—both in the Moscow region.
But that's it. Once again, they failed to break through to the Kapotnya refinery, and this raid cost them over 400 heavy drones (with a total price tag of $40–50 million).
On the Russian side, in addition to the large number of ground targets hit by Geranium and Banderol loitering munitions, at least five ships heading to or from Ukrainian ports near Odessa were struck by air-launched missiles. One of them sank.
This is beyond any comparison with the damage Ukraine previously inflicted on Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov. The reason is clear: the Ukrainian drones used in those strikes have warheads weighing only a few dozen kilograms at most, making them incapable of disabling, let alone sinking, a ship. Russian missiles, on the other hand, carry warheads ranging from 150 kg to 300 kg—and can certainly sink even oceangoing vessels, as they proved yesterday.
Meanwhile, the sharp decline in cargo turnover at Ukraine's Black Sea ports, which now threatens to become a full-blown blockade, is a very bad sign for Kiev. The ports around Odessa are Ukraine's main route for receiving essential goods and shipping out exports—both money and equipment for the army. And that is now in jeopardy.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍24🔥6👏4❤1
Yemen: Iran-Aligned Houthis Rout Their Opponents and Seize Control of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
The pace of developments in Yemen has been astonishing. Just a week ago, the situation appeared relatively stable. The fighting began with exchanges of strikes and the low-intensity clashes that have become routine in the country. At the same time, the mass mobilization of men in Houthi-controlled areas pointed to the seriousness of their intentions.
During the first weeks of the fighting, however, events seemed to be following the familiar pattern of earlier escalations: a brief round of hostilities followed by rapid de-escalation. But in early September, the first signs of an impending collapse began to emerge—at least from the perspective of the pro-Saudi forces.
After regrouping against the so-called “Saleh army” (shown in blue on the map), Houthi forces launched several converging attacks from the north and east. The decisive moment came when the Houthis broke through at the boundary between the sectors held by Saleh’s forces and government troops. That breakthrough set the stage for the rout that followed.
On September (9), reports emerged that the Houthis had seized a strategically important road junction east of Mocha. The move cut the pro-Saudi allies’ supply lines and lines of communication, while exposing Saleh’s army’s flank. And then the army broke and ran—quite literally.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
The pace of developments in Yemen has been astonishing. Just a week ago, the situation appeared relatively stable. The fighting began with exchanges of strikes and the low-intensity clashes that have become routine in the country. At the same time, the mass mobilization of men in Houthi-controlled areas pointed to the seriousness of their intentions.
During the first weeks of the fighting, however, events seemed to be following the familiar pattern of earlier escalations: a brief round of hostilities followed by rapid de-escalation. But in early September, the first signs of an impending collapse began to emerge—at least from the perspective of the pro-Saudi forces.
After regrouping against the so-called “Saleh army” (shown in blue on the map), Houthi forces launched several converging attacks from the north and east. The decisive moment came when the Houthis broke through at the boundary between the sectors held by Saleh’s forces and government troops. That breakthrough set the stage for the rout that followed.
On September (9), reports emerged that the Houthis had seized a strategically important road junction east of Mocha. The move cut the pro-Saudi allies’ supply lines and lines of communication, while exposing Saleh’s army’s flank. And then the army broke and ran—quite literally.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍21👏8❤6😱1
Journalist Yury Podolyaka on the memorandum signed by the First Ministers of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland
The First Ministers of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland—John Swinney (SNP), Rhun ap Iorwerth (Plaid Cymru), and Michelle O'Neill (Sinn Féin)—have signed a joint memorandum on the right to self-determination and independence from Britain, and on a future in the European Union.
Well, this is just a declaration signed by the ministers in their capacity as party leaders, with no legal force. But every important change always starts with declarations.
Incidentally, in all three parliaments, nationalist parties supporting secession currently hold a majority—not an absolute one, but a majority nonetheless.
What's more, things could get really tense if English nationalists from Nigel Farage's party come to power in the next parliamentary elections—a man who is not well-liked in the national "Ukraines" of the United Kingdom. So, in that scenario the ground for new separatist sentiment could become fertile quite quickly.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The First Ministers of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland—John Swinney (SNP), Rhun ap Iorwerth (Plaid Cymru), and Michelle O'Neill (Sinn Féin)—have signed a joint memorandum on the right to self-determination and independence from Britain, and on a future in the European Union.
Well, this is just a declaration signed by the ministers in their capacity as party leaders, with no legal force. But every important change always starts with declarations.
Incidentally, in all three parliaments, nationalist parties supporting secession currently hold a majority—not an absolute one, but a majority nonetheless.
What's more, things could get really tense if English nationalists from Nigel Farage's party come to power in the next parliamentary elections—a man who is not well-liked in the national "Ukraines" of the United Kingdom. So, in that scenario the ground for new separatist sentiment could become fertile quite quickly.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤17👍9🥴4🤔3😍2
⚡️⚡️⚡️“Geran-5” Sets New Speed Records—and Stymies Ukraine’s Air Defenses
Ukrainian social-media channels reported this morning that, during today’s attack on Ukraine, Russian Geran-5 drones reached speeds of 700–800 km/h while transiting areas covered by Ukrainian air-defense systems. This apparently enabled them to break through the defensive layers.
Why does this matter? The answer is simple. Over the past few weeks, Ukrainian military-focused channels have reported the start of mass production of interceptor systems designed to counter the Geran-5.
Ukrainian engineers appear to have based their calculations on the assumption that the Geran-5’s cruising speed—the speed at which fuel is consumed most efficiently, thereby maximizing the drone’s range—is approximately 350–400 km/h. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s newest interceptor drones, now being produced in the hundreds, can reach speeds of up to 465 km/h. This allowed them, albeit with greater difficulty than when intercepting Geran-2 and Geran-3 drones, to pursue and intercept many Geran-5s from behind.
For this reason, Russian engineers apparently decided to counter Ukraine’s new air-defense systems by switching the engine to its boosted, maximum-speed mode—either upon detecting pursuit or while passing through a previously identified interceptor-drone screen. At speeds exceeding 700 km/h, Ukrainian interceptor UAVs proved unable to catch the Geran-5.
This produced the result Russia was seeking and has once again forced Ukrainian engineers back to the drawing board in search of an effective countermeasure.
Meanwhile, discussion in Russia has already turned to the imminent arrival of the Geran-6. It would hardly be accurate to describe this system as a UAV at all. In essence, it is expected to be a high-speed missile flying along a high-altitude, quasi-ballistic trajectory and carrying a warhead weighing up to 600 kg. No anti-drone systems—including the jet-powered interceptors currently being tested by Ukraine—would be capable of stopping it.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Ukrainian social-media channels reported this morning that, during today’s attack on Ukraine, Russian Geran-5 drones reached speeds of 700–800 km/h while transiting areas covered by Ukrainian air-defense systems. This apparently enabled them to break through the defensive layers.
Why does this matter? The answer is simple. Over the past few weeks, Ukrainian military-focused channels have reported the start of mass production of interceptor systems designed to counter the Geran-5.
Ukrainian engineers appear to have based their calculations on the assumption that the Geran-5’s cruising speed—the speed at which fuel is consumed most efficiently, thereby maximizing the drone’s range—is approximately 350–400 km/h. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s newest interceptor drones, now being produced in the hundreds, can reach speeds of up to 465 km/h. This allowed them, albeit with greater difficulty than when intercepting Geran-2 and Geran-3 drones, to pursue and intercept many Geran-5s from behind.
For this reason, Russian engineers apparently decided to counter Ukraine’s new air-defense systems by switching the engine to its boosted, maximum-speed mode—either upon detecting pursuit or while passing through a previously identified interceptor-drone screen. At speeds exceeding 700 km/h, Ukrainian interceptor UAVs proved unable to catch the Geran-5.
This produced the result Russia was seeking and has once again forced Ukrainian engineers back to the drawing board in search of an effective countermeasure.
Meanwhile, discussion in Russia has already turned to the imminent arrival of the Geran-6. It would hardly be accurate to describe this system as a UAV at all. In essence, it is expected to be a high-speed missile flying along a high-altitude, quasi-ballistic trajectory and carrying a warhead weighing up to 600 kg. No anti-drone systems—including the jet-powered interceptors currently being tested by Ukraine—would be capable of stopping it.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥18👏10❤8