https://youtu.be/CoVRqqO6qeI

Those of you from UK will remember David Icke. His premonitions or whatever it was in 1991 led to his not only being humiliated but outcast. Critics called it “crucifixion by media”. A sympathetic person wouldn’t have interviewed him on live TV back then. He did rather walk into trouble & he got plenty. Not only was he saying outlandish things but he was close to what the people I now call the perpetrators were actually doing.
Interviewed again in 2016, you can see the frustration pouring out of him.
I’ve had just a three year introduction. It’s not a burden to wish on anybody.
Unfortunately, he was right. His earliest prognostications were incoherent but they’ve got so crisp over recent years that, when I realised covid was a global crime, long in the planning & connected to other global crimes, I did think of David.
He’s a good person.
Best wishes
Mike

There are many more people with Covid19 illness in our/your country than the total amount of people including the fully healthy vast majority who flies in from China. Variants are home-grown. Makes no difference to endemic disease. So what is the passenger testing really about?

Robin

https://t.me/robinmg/25610

"I disagree with Novak Djokovic completely" Martina Navratilova still not impressed with Serbian star's vaccination stance » FirstSportz
https://firstsportz.com/tennis-news-i-disagree-with-novak-djokovic-completely-on-one-thing-martina-navratilova-still-not-impressed-with-serbian-stars-vaccination-stance/

Wimbledon great Martina Navratilova, 66, is diagnosed with throat and breast cancer | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11592179/Wimbledon-great-Martina-Navratilova-66-diagnosed-throat-breast-cancer.html

I place Hippocrates firmly on the side of early treatment as opposed to vaccination. Were he alive today he would probably be slandered as an "anti-vaxxer" by the Big Pharma aligned establishment..

Robin

Return of the MASKS: Now health chiefs say face coverings should be brought back | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11592439/Return-MASKS-health-chiefs-say-face-coverings-brought-back.html

NEW Covid variant XBB.1.5 that is already behind one in 25 cases in the UK | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11591623/Experts-claim-NEW-Covid-variant-named-XBB-1-5.html

All looks like a big deja-vu.. they are testing our resolve to oppose them and the resolve of the brainwashed to comply and oppose us.

Robin

Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?

The virus appears to be evolving in ways that evade immunity.

"A Cleveland Clinic study that tracked its healthcare workers..

Notably, workers who had received more doses were at higher risk of getting sick.

Those who received three more doses were 3.4 times as likely to get infected as the unvaccinated, while those who received two were only 2.6 times as likely.

“This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19,” the authors noted."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/are-vaccines-fueling-new-covid-variants-xbb-northeast-antibodies-mutation-strain-immune-imprinting-11672483618

The Wall Street Journal arrived in 2023 at what Geert Vanden Bossche said in 2021, as I published on my website:

"Mass vaccination.. will eventually drive the propagation of more infectious variants."

- Geert Vanden Bossche

So we always knew this was going to happen.

The mainstream media is only about two years behind us in understanding what is going on.

Robin

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/09/13/why-mass-vaccinations-prolong-and-make-epidemics-deadlier-real-vaccine-expert-calls-out-flawed-government-pandemic-strategy/

This is a very good quote from Vanden Bossche from 2021:

"Mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the middle of a viral pandemic will, for generations to come, become the most sobering example of the boundaries of human intervention in nature in general and of the boundaries of conventional vaccinology in particular. This irrational experiment will unambiguously highlight the clear-cut limitations of conventional vaccine approaches. It will convincingly illustrate that – unlike natural acute self-limiting infection or disease – ‘modern’ technologies alone do not suffice to develop vaccines that are capable of preventing viral transmission or immune escape. For that matter, even ‘modern’ vaccines will not allow conventional B or T cell-directed antigens to generate herd immunity when massively administered in the heat of a pandemic of a highly mutable virus.

Because of the disastrous consequences the current mass vaccination campaign will entail, I cannot imagine that the word ‘vaccine’ will continue to persist in the medical vade-mecum. In order to highlight the short-comings of all vaccines eliciting conventional B- or T cell-centered immune responses I propose to coin a new term for these vaccines and refer to them as ‘conditionally immune protection-inducing formulations’ (CIPIFs).

While the word ‘vaccine’ may be banned, the word ‘fact checker’ will only gain traction as a general term used for any scientifically illiterate person who uses arrogance to vilify those who speak the truth and promotes – in exchange for dirty money – a narrative and groupthink mentality that are merely inspired by the interests of the stakeholders they blindly support.

For lack of insight, international and public health authorities will continue to blame lack of success on the more infectious variants and propose (impose?) boosters as a never-ending strategy to chasing new emerging variants. This should ring a bell to people and make them understand that the mass vaccination program is nothing else but a big experiment. For how much longer is the public going to believe the treacherous narrative? One can only hope that more and more people will begin to realize that the outcome of this experiment is being evaluated on a purely empirical basis and fully unpredictable, at least in the mind of those who’re overstepping their competence and authority to impose vaccine mandates on never-ending booster shots and thereby trample on human rights while humiliating independent scientists who fight back with rational arguments out of passion for the truth. Only a mind that has lost its grasp on reality can fail to see how pathetic all this has become…."

Geert Vanden Bossche, (DVM, PhD)

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/09/13/why-mass-vaccinations-prolong-and-make-epidemics-deadlier-real-vaccine-expert-calls-out-flawed-government-pandemic-strategy/

ICAN Obtains Disturbing Information About AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 Vaccine from the UK Equivalent of the FDA - ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network

AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.

"One of these studies investigated biodistribution of the AstraZeneca vaccine, meaning where it goes in the body after injection, in mice.  This study revealed that the viral vector DNA did not remain localized in the injection site but instead migrated to other organs.  Disturbingly, the study found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs, and spleens of the mice following vaccination.  

The study documents further revealed that, in early 2021, AstraZeneca was forced to amend its data sheet for the vaccine after concluding that there may have been a causal association between the vaccine and serious hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis.

A final shocking revelation in the documents was the heavily redacted discussion of two individuals who developed serious immune-mediated neurological demyelinating conditions following vaccination.  Although it states there was “no evidence suggesting a causal relationship” between the vaccine and these events, the UK’s clinical overview conceded that “vaccinations could be associated with immune-mediated neurological conditions” and therefore these adverse events were included as an important potential risk in the vaccine’s risk management plan."

https://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-obtains-disturbing-information-about-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-from-the-uk-equivalent-of-the-fda/

The Allegory of Plato's Cave . . .

With his new perception of the world, the man will of course want to return to his friends to share his incredible discoveries, but the prisoners cannot recognise their own friend.

Q&A #25 : Children's hospitals in the USA are experiencing a major surge of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). Parents are worried. Why is this happening and should we be concerned?  | Voice for Science and Solidarity

"In my opinion, the reason for the surge is that vaccinees now serve as an asymptomatic reservoir for RSV and other viral infections.

Of course,  the part of the population that has weakened or untrained innate immunity and is not vaccinated will suffer most from the higher infectious pressure caused by the C-19 vax’ed segments of the population (i.e., young children and elderly people). Furthermore, young children may start out developing asymptomatic infection due to their innate immune protection. However, re-exposure at a time where they’re still sitting on nonneutralizing polyreactive IgM (as a result of previous asymptomatic infection) may increase their susceptibility to RSV infection (due to IgM Ab-mediated enhancement of viral infectiousness) and is therefore likely to cause more serious disease symptoms. The likelihood of re-exposure to RSV shortly after the first asymptomatic infection increases with higher RSV infection rate and the latter increases with higher rates of asymptomatic RSV transmission which, in turn, is high in highly C-19 vaccinated populations.

So, both enhanced asymptomatic transmission and enhanced susceptibility to RSV subsequent to previous asymptomatic infection are linked to mass vaccination."

https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/q-a-25-childrens-hospitals-in-the-usa-are-experiencing-a-major-surge-of-respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv-parents-are-worried-why-is-this-happening-and-should-we-be-concerned

How many lives did the Covid vaccines really save?

"Any claims about the vaccine reducing the number of covid deaths are therefore irrelevant in assessing efficacy without considering the overall impact on all-cause mortality. Even if the vaccines really did save 20 million from covid deaths then it would not be effective if it led to more than 20 million deaths from adverse events.

In fact, not only is there now strong evidence of an increase in all-cause mortality among the vaccinated, but we do not believe there is any objective reliable evidence that the covid vaccines saved any PREVENTABLE deaths from covid.

There are nine reasons for coming to this conclusion:
1. No properly conducted randomized trial has provided evidence of any covid deaths avoided
They were never designed to do so [1]. Even if we accept the flawed Pfizer study results of efficacy based on 162 out of 22,000 placebo recipients getting covid compared to only 8 out of 22,000 vaccine recipients [2] not even one of those 162 placebo recipients in the trial who got covid died of covid.
2. The Pfizer trial actually provides some evidence of increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated
Although the numbers are too small to be statistically significant, in the 6-month Pfizer follow up there were more all-cause deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group (15 vs 14 deaths, later 21 vs 17) with just 3 people in total having covid listed as a cause of death (1 in vaccine group, 2 in placebo group) [3]. Moreover, the Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group [4].
3. Anecdotal evidence: Our own experience shows the vaccines are neither effective nor safe
Since the vaccination programme started, we have observed that it is our vaccinated friends and colleagues who are almost exclusively getting ill from covid. And it is also the vaccinated who we see dying unexpectedly. This anecdotal evidence of increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated is backed up by the only independent survey evidence attempting to determine the difference in all-cause mortality [5].
4. Official government statistics claiming vaccines reduce covid mortality cannot be trusted
The gatekeepers of such data have a major vested interest in claiming success of the vaccine programme. They therefore do not allow access to the raw data and frequently manipulate the data [6]. Moreover, these data are compromised by the flawed definition of what constitutes a covid death (‘anybody dying of any cause within 28 days of a positive PCR test’) and defining a person getting covid within 14 days of vaccination as ‘unvaccinated’ [7], [8]. These various corrupt definition and data integrity problems all create bias in favour of vaccine efficacy and are also evident in all observational studies claiming vaccines reduce covid mortality.
5. Official government statistics claiming vaccines reduce all-cause mortality are demonstrably flawed
In addition to all the definition and data integrity problems, official data (for example from the UK’s office for National Statistics [9] are further compromised in that 1) many deaths shortly after vaccination are misclassified as unvaccinated and 2) grossly underestimate the population proportion of unvaccinated, which inflates the true mortality rate of the unvaccinated [10]. When adjusted for these biases, the data show that since the start of 2022, all-cause mortality in the ever-vaccinated is higher than the never vaccinated in all-age groups [11].
6. Artificially inflated covid death numbers
Many deaths classified as covid deaths were not caused by covid, and many of those that were could have been prevented if demonstrably successful alternative early protocol treatments were provided. Moreover, many covid deaths may ultimately have been caused by denial of antibiotics to treat the resulting bacterial pneumonia that was the ultimate cause of death [12], [13].
7. National comparisons suggest the vaccines do not reduce covid mortality.."

Cont:
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/kirsch-challenge

New data from Israel's HMOs reveals a decline in the number of pregnant women in their first trimester starting in February 2021, immediately after the start of the Covid-19 vaccination rollout

"The new data from Maccabi is particularly concerning in light of a similar and even more dramatic trend, which emerges from data from another HMO – Meuchedet, on the number of women who were in their first trimester each month during the same period, starting in February 2021. This data was also obtained through a FOI request, submitted by attorney Ori Xavi in July 2022. Also According to Muehedat data, the decline began in January 2021 - when the number of women in their first trimester was 8,267 and has since plunged to 6,279 in January 2022 – a 24% decrease during 2021."

“This very alarming signal cannot be explained by Covid-19 infections”, concluded the researchers. "The correlation with the vaccination campaign and the situation at the time suggests that vaccination had physiological influences on the fertility of women or men".

https://rtmag.co.il/english/data-from-israel-s-hmos-reveal-a-decline-in-the-number-of-pregnant-women-in-their-first-trimester-starting-in-february-2021,-immediately-after-the-start-of-the-covid-19-vaccination-rollout

I am doubling down on twitter.

10 million views to the first one. Added the second part to what is becoming a factual thread. No theories, only facts.

Robin

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1609524744830738434